# Objective
- Fixes#5365
- The `assert!()` when the resource from `World::resource_scope` is inserted into the world is not descriptive.
## Solution
- Add more context to the assert inside of `World::resource_scope` when the `FnOnce` param inserts the resource.
# Objective
`FromReflect` is a commonly used component to the Reflect API. It's required as a bound for reflecting things like `Vec<T>` and `HashMap<K, V>` and is generally useful (if not necessary) to derive on most structs or enums.
Currently, however, it is not exported in `bevy_reflect`'s prelude. This means a module that uses `bevy_reflect` might have the following two lines:
```rust
use bevy_reflect::prelude::*;
use bevy_reflect::FromReflect;
```
Additionally, users of the full engine might need to put:
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
use bevy::reflect::FromReflect;
```
## Solution
Add `FromReflect` to the prelude of `bevy_reflect`.
---
## Changelog
- Added `FromReflect` to the prelude of `bevy_reflect`
# Objective
- Similar to `SystemChangeTick`, probably somewhat useful for debugging messages.
---
## Changelog
- Added `SystemName` which copies the `SystemMeta::name` field so it can be accessed within a system.
Probably a copy-paste error, but `Add<Color>` and `AddAssign<Color>` should use `rhs.as_hlsa_f32()` instead of `rhs.as_linear_rgba_f32()` when the LHS is a `Color::Hsla`. Fixes#5543.
Co-authored-by: Verte <105466627+vertesians@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
The reflection impls on `Option<T>` have the bound `T: Reflect + Clone`. This means that using `FromReflect` requires `Clone` even though we can normally get away with just `FromReflect`.
## Solution
Update the bounds on `Option<T>` to match that of `Vec<T>`, where `T: FromReflect`.
This helps remove a `Clone` implementation that may be undesired but added for the sole purpose of getting the code to compile.
---
## Changelog
* Reflection on `Option<T>` now has `T` bound by `FromReflect` rather than `Reflect + Clone`
* Added a `FromReflect` impl for `Instant`
## Migration Guide
If using `Option<T>` with Bevy's reflection API, `T` now needs to implement `FromReflect` rather than just `Clone`. This can be achieved easily by simply deriving `FromReflect`:
```rust
// OLD
#[derive(Reflect, Clone)]
struct Foo;
let reflected: Box<dyn Reflect> = Box::new(Some(Foo));
// NEW
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
struct Foo;
let reflected: Box<dyn Reflect> = Box::new(Some(Foo));
```
> Note: You can still derive `Clone`, but it's not required in order to compile.
# Objective
Rust 1.63 resolved [an issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83701) that prevents you from combining explicit generic arguments with `impl Trait` arguments.
Now, we no longer need to use dynamic dispatch to work around this.
## Migration Guide
The methods `Schedule::get_stage` and `get_stage_mut` now accept `impl StageLabel` instead of `&dyn StageLabel`.
### Before
```rust
let stage = schedule.get_stage_mut::<SystemStage>(&MyLabel)?;
```
### After
```rust
let stage = schedule.get_stage_mut::<SystemStage>(MyLabel)?;
```
# Objective
- Replace the square with a circle in the breakout example.
- Fixes#4324, adopted from #4682 by @shaderduck.
## Solution
- Uses the Mesh2D APIs to draw a circle. The collision still uses the AABB algorithm, but it seems to be working fine, and I haven't seen any odd looking cases.
# Objective
This PR changes it possible to use vertex colors without a texture using the bevy_sprite ColorMaterial.
Fixes#5679
## Solution
- Made multiplication of the output color independent of the COLOR_MATERIAL_FLAGS_TEXTURE_BIT bit
- Extended mesh2d_vertex_color_texture example to show off both vertex colors and tinting
Not sure if extending the existing example was the right call but it seems to be reasonable to me.
I couldn't find any tests for the shaders and I think adding shader testing would be beyond the scope of this PR. So no tests in this PR. 😬
Co-authored-by: Jonas Wagner <jonas@29a.ch>
# Objective
While poking around the hierarchy code, I wondered why some asserts in tests were duplicated.
Some git blame later, I found out that commit ( 8eb0440f1e ) added already existing asserts while removing others.
## Solution
Remove the duplicated asserts.
# Objective
When an invalid attribute is inserted and the LogPlugin is not enabled the full error is not printed which means makes it hard to diagnose.
## Solution
- Always print the full message in the panic.
## Notes
I originally had a separate error log because I wanted to make it clearer for users, but this is probably causing more issues than necessary.
# Objective
Remove unused `enum DepthCalculation` and its usages. This was used to compute visible entities in the [old renderer](db665b96c0/crates/bevy_render/src/camera/visible_entities.rs), but is now unused.
## Solution
`sed 's/DepthCalculation//g'`
---
## Changelog
### Changed
Removed `bevy_render:📷:DepthCalculation`.
## Migration Guide
Remove references to `bevy_render:📷:DepthCalculation`, such as `use bevy_render:📷:DepthCalculation`. Remove `depth_calculation` fields from Projections.
# Objective
The `deny.toml` file defines some crates that are skipped for duplicate dependency detection, because the issues are deeper in the dependency tree and not easily fixable.
However, two of those exceptions are no longer necessary.
## Solution
Remove `hashbrown` and `mio` from the skipped crates, according to `cargo deny check` this is no longer needed.
# Objective
Fixes#5668.
The Rust version used in the CI `build` step previously depended on the default Rust version defined by GitHub in the Ubuntu image: <https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/main/images/linux/Ubuntu2004-Readme.md#rust-tools>
This currently doesn't allow us to use Rust 1.63 features until this version is updated.
## Solution
We now use the `actions-rs/toolchain@v1` action to always use the latest stable Rust version.
This is already used for other CI jobs that we have.
# Objective
Make CI pass on bevy main.
Update to rust-1.63, updated clippy to 1.63 which introduced the following enhancements:
- [undocumented_unsafe_blocks](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#undocumented_unsafe_blocks): Now also lints on unsafe trait implementations
This caught two incorrectly written ( but existing) safety comments for unsafe traits.
## Solution
Fix the comment to use `SAFETY:`
# Objective
While trying out the lint `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` I noticed that `insert_resource_by_id` didn't drop the old value if it already existed, and reimplemented `Column::replace` manually for no apparent reason.
## Solution
- use `Column::replace` and add a test expecting the correct drop count
---
## Changelog
- `World::insert_resource_by_id` will now correctly drop the old resource value, if one already existed
# Objective
- The `Display` impl for `ReflectPathError` is pretty unspecific (e.g. `the current struct doesn't have a field with the given name`
- it has info for better messages available
## Solution
- make the display impl more descriptive by including values from the type
# Objective
- `ReflectMut` served no purpose that wasn't met by `Mut<dyn Reflect>` which is easier to understand since you have to deal with fewer types
- there is another `ReflectMut` type that could be confused with this one
## Solution/Changelog
- relax `T: ?Sized` bound in `Mut<T>`
- replace all instances of `ReflectMut` with `Mut<dyn Reflect>`
# Objective
Provide a safe API to access an `EntityMut`'s `World`.
## Solution
* Add `EntityMut::into_world_mut` for safe access to the entity's world.
---
## Changelog
* Add `EntityMut::into_world_mut` for safe access to the entity's world.
# Objective
`ShaderData` is marked as public, but is an internal type only used by one other
internal type, so it should be made private.
## Solution
`ShaderData` is only used in `ShaderCache`, and the latter is private,
so there is no need to make the former public. This change removes the
`pub` keyword from `ShaderData`, hidding it as the implementation detail
it is.
Split from #5600
# Objective
- I often have UI nodes that are completely transparent and just for organisation
- Don't render them
- I doesn't bring a lot of improvements, but it doesn't add a lot of complexity either
*This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.*
# Objective
Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds.
While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks:
* it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource
* it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource
* we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component).
* dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways
* raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values
* we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor
## Notes to reviewers
* Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits.
*ira: My commits are not as well organized :')*
* I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does.
* I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981.
## Changelog
`Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro.
## Migration Guide
Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource.
If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics.
`ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing.
Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead.
Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
The `LICENSE` file in the root directory was removed in #4966. This breaks the license shield link in the README.
## Solution
I changed the link to instead point at the license section of the readme on the main repo page. I think this is better than a 404, but I am unsure as to if it's the best solution. As such feedback is appreciated.
# Objective
`bevy::render::texture::ImageSettings` was added to prelude in #5566, so these `use` statements are unnecessary and the examples can be made a bit more concise.
## Solution
Remove `use bevy::render::texture::ImageSettings`
# Objective
- I wanted to have controls independent from keyboard layout and found that bevy doesn't have a proper implementation for that
## Solution
- I created a `ScanCode` enum with two hundreds scan codes and updated `keyboard_input_system` to include and update `ResMut<Input<ScanCode>>`
- closes both https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/2052 and https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/862
Co-authored-by: Bleb1k <91003089+Bleb1k@users.noreply.github.com>
#4197 intended to remove all `pub` constructors of `Children` and `Parent` and it seems like this one was missed.
Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#5544
- Part of the splitting process of #3692.
## Solution
- Document everything in the `gamepad.rs` file.
- Add a doc example for mocking gamepad input.
---
## Changelog
- Added and updated the documentation inside of the `gamepad.rs` file.
# Objective
- Similar to #5512 , the `View` struct definition in the shaders in `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` were out of sync with the rust-side `ViewUniform`. Only `view_proj` was being used and is the first member and as those shaders are not customisable it makes little difference in practice, unlike for `Mesh2d`.
## Solution
- Sync shader `View` struct definition in `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` with the correct definition that matches `ViewUniform`
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Change frametimediagnostic from seconds to milliseconds because this will always be less than one seconds and is the common diagnostic display unit for game engines.
## Solution
- multiplied the existing value by 1000
---
## Changelog
Frametimes are now reported in milliseconds
Co-authored-by: Syama Mishra <38512086+SyamaMishra@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: McSpidey <mcspidey@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
In Bevy 0.8, the default filter mode was changed to linear (#4465). I believe this is a sensible default, but it's also very common to want to use point filtering (e.g. for pixel art games).
## Solution
I am proposing including `bevy_render::texture::ImageSettings` in the Bevy prelude so it is more ergonomic to change the filtering in such cases.
---
## Changelog
### Added
- Added `bevy_render::texture::ImageSettings` to prelude.
# Objective
Add reflect/from reflect impls for NonZero integer types. I'm guessing these haven't been added yet because no one has needed them as of yet.
# Objective
Simplify the worldquery trait hierarchy as much as possible by putting it all in one trait. If/when gats are stabilised this can be trivially migrated over to use them, although that's not why I made this PR, those reasons are:
- Moves all of the conceptually related unsafe code for a worldquery next to eachother
- Removes now unnecessary traits simplifying the "type system magic" in bevy_ecs
---
## Changelog
All methods/functions/types/consts on `FetchState` and `Fetch` traits have been moved to the `WorldQuery` trait and the other traits removed. `WorldQueryGats` now only contains an `Item` and `Fetch` assoc type.
## Migration Guide
Implementors should move items in impls to the `WorldQuery/Gats` traits and remove any `Fetch`/`FetchState` impls
Any use sites of items in the `Fetch`/`FetchState` traits should be updated to use the `WorldQuery` trait items instead
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#5384 and maybe other issues around window closing/app not exiting
## Solution
There are three systems involved in exiting when closing a window:
- `close_when_requested` asking Winit to close the window in stage `Update`
- `exit_on_all_closed` exiting when no window remains opened in stage `Update`
- `change_window` removing windows that are closed in stage `PostUpdate`
This ordering meant that when closing a window, we had to run one more frame to actually exit. As there was no window, panics could occur in systems assuming there was a window. In case of Bevy app using a low power options, that means waiting for the timeout before actually exiting the app (60 seconds by default)
This PR changes the ordering so that `exit_on_all_closed` happens after `change_window` in the same frame, so there isn't an extra frame without window
> In draft until #4761 is merged. See the relevant commits [here](a85fe94a18).
---
# Objective
Update enums across Bevy to use the new enum reflection and get rid of `#[reflect_value(...)]` usages.
## Solution
Find and replace all[^1] instances of `#[reflect_value(...)]` on enum types.
---
## Changelog
- Updated all[^1] reflected enums to implement `Enum` (i.e. they are no longer `ReflectRef::Value`)
## Migration Guide
Bevy-defined enums have been updated to implement `Enum` and are not considered value types (`ReflectRef::Value`) anymore. This means that their serialized representations will need to be updated. For example, given the Bevy enum:
```rust
pub enum ScalingMode {
None,
WindowSize,
Auto { min_width: f32, min_height: f32 },
FixedVertical(f32),
FixedHorizontal(f32),
}
```
You will need to update the serialized versions accordingly.
```js
// OLD FORMAT
{
"type": "bevy_render:📷:projection::ScalingMode",
"value": FixedHorizontal(720),
},
// NEW FORMAT
{
"type": "bevy_render:📷:projection::ScalingMode",
"enum": {
"variant": "FixedHorizontal",
"tuple": [
{
"type": "f32",
"value": 720,
},
],
},
},
```
This may also have other smaller implications (such as `Debug` representation), but serialization is probably the most prominent.
[^1]: All enums except `HandleId` as neither `Uuid` nor `AssetPathId` implement the reflection traits
# Objective
> This is a revival of #1347. Credit for the original PR should go to @Davier.
Currently, enums are treated as `ReflectRef::Value` types by `bevy_reflect`. Obviously, there needs to be better a better representation for enums using the reflection API.
## Solution
Based on prior work from @Davier, an `Enum` trait has been added as well as the ability to automatically implement it via the `Reflect` derive macro. This allows enums to be expressed dynamically:
```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
enum Foo {
A,
B(usize),
C { value: f32 },
}
let mut foo = Foo::B(123);
assert_eq!("B", foo.variant_name());
assert_eq!(1, foo.field_len());
let new_value = DynamicEnum::from(Foo::C { value: 1.23 });
foo.apply(&new_value);
assert_eq!(Foo::C{value: 1.23}, foo);
```
### Features
#### Derive Macro
Use the `#[derive(Reflect)]` macro to automatically implement the `Enum` trait for enum definitions. Optionally, you can use `#[reflect(ignore)]` with both variants and variant fields, just like you can with structs. These ignored items will not be considered as part of the reflection and cannot be accessed via reflection.
```rust
#[derive(Reflect)]
enum TestEnum {
A,
// Uncomment to ignore all of `B`
// #[reflect(ignore)]
B(usize),
C {
// Uncomment to ignore only field `foo` of `C`
// #[reflect(ignore)]
foo: f32,
bar: bool,
},
}
```
#### Dynamic Enums
Enums may be created/represented dynamically via the `DynamicEnum` struct. The main purpose of this struct is to allow enums to be deserialized into a partial state and to allow dynamic patching. In order to ensure conversion from a `DynamicEnum` to a concrete enum type goes smoothly, be sure to add `FromReflect` to your derive macro.
```rust
let mut value = TestEnum::A;
// Create from a concrete instance
let dyn_enum = DynamicEnum::from(TestEnum::B(123));
value.apply(&dyn_enum);
assert_eq!(TestEnum::B(123), value);
// Create a purely dynamic instance
let dyn_enum = DynamicEnum::new("TestEnum", "A", ());
value.apply(&dyn_enum);
assert_eq!(TestEnum::A, value);
```
#### Variants
An enum value is always represented as one of its variants— never the enum in its entirety.
```rust
let value = TestEnum::A;
assert_eq!("A", value.variant_name());
// Since we are using the `A` variant, we cannot also be the `B` variant
assert_ne!("B", value.variant_name());
```
All variant types are representable within the `Enum` trait: unit, struct, and tuple.
You can get the current type like:
```rust
match value.variant_type() {
VariantType::Unit => println!("A unit variant!"),
VariantType::Struct => println!("A struct variant!"),
VariantType::Tuple => println!("A tuple variant!"),
}
```
> Notice that they don't contain any values representing the fields. These are purely tags.
If a variant has them, you can access the fields as well:
```rust
let mut value = TestEnum::C {
foo: 1.23,
bar: false
};
// Read/write specific fields
*value.field_mut("bar").unwrap() = true;
// Iterate over the entire collection of fields
for field in value.iter_fields() {
println!("{} = {:?}", field.name(), field.value());
}
```
#### Variant Swapping
It might seem odd to group all variant types under a single trait (why allow `iter_fields` on a unit variant?), but the reason this was done ~~is to easily allow *variant swapping*.~~ As I was recently drafting up the **Design Decisions** section, I discovered that other solutions could have been made to work with variant swapping. So while there are reasons to keep the all-in-one approach, variant swapping is _not_ one of them.
```rust
let mut value: Box<dyn Enum> = Box::new(TestEnum::A);
value.set(Box::new(TestEnum::B(123))).unwrap();
```
#### Serialization
Enums can be serialized and deserialized via reflection without needing to implement `Serialize` or `Deserialize` themselves (which can save thousands of lines of generated code). Below are the ways an enum can be serialized.
> Note, like the rest of reflection-based serialization, the order of the keys in these representations is important!
##### Unit
```json
{
"type": "my_crate::TestEnum",
"enum": {
"variant": "A"
}
}
```
##### Tuple
```json
{
"type": "my_crate::TestEnum",
"enum": {
"variant": "B",
"tuple": [
{
"type": "usize",
"value": 123
}
]
}
}
```
<details>
<summary>Effects on Option</summary>
This ends up making `Option` look a little ugly:
```json
{
"type": "core::option::Option<usize>",
"enum": {
"variant": "Some",
"tuple": [
{
"type": "usize",
"value": 123
}
]
}
}
```
</details>
##### Struct
```json
{
"type": "my_crate::TestEnum",
"enum": {
"variant": "C",
"struct": {
"foo": {
"type": "f32",
"value": 1.23
},
"bar": {
"type": "bool",
"value": false
}
}
}
}
```
## Design Decisions
<details>
<summary><strong>View Section</strong></summary>
This section is here to provide some context for why certain decisions were made for this PR, alternatives that could have been used instead, and what could be improved upon in the future.
### Variant Representation
One of the biggest decisions was to decide on how to represent variants. The current design uses a "all-in-one" design where unit, tuple, and struct variants are all simultaneously represented by the `Enum` trait. This is not the only way it could have been done, though.
#### Alternatives
##### 1. Variant Traits
One way of representing variants would be to define traits for each variant, implementing them whenever an enum featured at least one instance of them. This would allow us to define variants like:
```rust
pub trait Enum: Reflect {
fn variant(&self) -> Variant;
}
pub enum Variant<'a> {
Unit,
Tuple(&'a dyn TupleVariant),
Struct(&'a dyn StructVariant),
}
pub trait TupleVariant {
fn field_len(&self) -> usize;
// ...
}
```
And then do things like:
```rust
fn get_tuple_len(foo: &dyn Enum) -> usize {
match foo.variant() {
Variant::Tuple(tuple) => tuple.field_len(),
_ => panic!("not a tuple variant!")
}
}
```
The reason this PR does not go with this approach is because of the fact that variants are not separate types. In other words, we cannot implement traits on specific variants— these cover the *entire* enum. This means we offer an easy footgun:
```rust
let foo: Option<i32> = None;
let my_enum = Box::new(foo) as Box<dyn TupleVariant>;
```
Here, `my_enum` contains `foo`, which is a unit variant. However, since we need to implement `TupleVariant` for `Option` as a whole, it's possible to perform such a cast. This is obviously wrong, but could easily go unnoticed. So unfortunately, this makes it not a good candidate for representing variants.
##### 2. Variant Structs
To get around the issue of traits necessarily needing to apply to both the enum and its variants, we could instead use structs that are created on a per-variant basis. This was also considered but was ultimately [[removed](71d27ab3c6) due to concerns about allocations.
Each variant struct would probably look something like:
```rust
pub trait Enum: Reflect {
fn variant_mut(&self) -> VariantMut;
}
pub enum VariantMut<'a> {
Unit,
Tuple(TupleVariantMut),
Struct(StructVariantMut),
}
struct StructVariantMut<'a> {
fields: Vec<&'a mut dyn Reflect>,
field_indices: HashMap<Cow<'static, str>, usize>
}
```
This allows us to isolate struct variants into their own defined struct and define methods specifically for their use. It also prevents users from casting to it since it's not a trait. However, this is not an optimal solution. Both `field_indices` and `fields` will require an allocation (remember, a `Box<[T]>` still requires a `Vec<T>` in order to be constructed). This *might* be a problem if called frequently enough.
##### 3. Generated Structs
The original design, implemented by @Davier, instead generates structs specific for each variant. So if we had a variant path like `Foo::Bar`, we'd generate a struct named `FooBarWrapper`. This would be newtyped around the original enum and forward tuple or struct methods to the enum with the chosen variant.
Because it involved using the `Tuple` and `Struct` traits (which are also both bound on `Reflect`), this meant a bit more code had to be generated. For a single struct variant with one field, the generated code amounted to ~110LoC. However, each new field added to that variant only added ~6 more LoC.
In order to work properly, the enum had to be transmuted to the generated struct:
```rust
fn variant(&self) -> crate::EnumVariant<'_> {
match self {
Foo::Bar {value: i32} => {
let wrapper_ref = unsafe {
std::mem::transmute::<&Self, &FooBarWrapper>(self)
};
crate::EnumVariant::Struct(wrapper_ref as &dyn crate::Struct)
}
}
}
```
This works because `FooBarWrapper` is defined as `repr(transparent)`.
Out of all the alternatives, this would probably be the one most likely to be used again in the future. The reasons for why this PR did not continue to use it was because:
* To reduce generated code (which would hopefully speed up compile times)
* To avoid cluttering the code with generated structs not visible to the user
* To keep bevy_reflect simple and extensible (these generated structs act as proxies and might not play well with current or future systems)
* To avoid additional unsafe blocks
* My own misunderstanding of @Davier's code
That last point is obviously on me. I misjudged the code to be too unsafe and unable to handle variant swapping (which it probably could) when I was rebasing it. Looking over it again when writing up this whole section, I see that it was actually a pretty clever way of handling variant representation.
#### Benefits of All-in-One
As stated before, the current implementation uses an all-in-one approach. All variants are capable of containing fields as far as `Enum` is concerned. This provides a few benefits that the alternatives do not (reduced indirection, safer code, etc.).
The biggest benefit, though, is direct field access. Rather than forcing users to have to go through pattern matching, we grant direct access to the fields contained by the current variant. The reason we can do this is because all of the pattern matching happens internally. Getting the field at index `2` will automatically return `Some(...)` for the current variant if it has a field at that index or `None` if it doesn't (or can't).
This could be useful for scenarios where the variant has already been verified or just set/swapped (or even where the type of variant doesn't matter):
```rust
let dyn_enum: &mut dyn Enum = &mut Foo::Bar {value: 123};
// We know it's the `Bar` variant
let field = dyn_enum.field("value").unwrap();
```
Reflection is not a type-safe abstraction— almost every return value is wrapped in `Option<...>`. There are plenty of places to check and recheck that a value is what Reflect says it is. Forcing users to have to go through `match` each time they want to access a field might just be an extra step among dozens of other verification processes.
Some might disagree, but ultimately, my view is that the benefit here is an improvement to the ergonomics and usability of reflected enums.
</details>
---
## Changelog
### Added
* Added `Enum` trait
* Added `Enum` impl to `Reflect` derive macro
* Added `DynamicEnum` struct
* Added `DynamicVariant`
* Added `EnumInfo`
* Added `VariantInfo`
* Added `StructVariantInfo`
* Added `TupleVariantInfo`
* Added `UnitVariantInfo`
* Added serializtion/deserialization support for enums
* Added `EnumSerializer`
* Added `VariantType`
* Added `VariantFieldIter`
* Added `VariantField`
* Added `enum_partial_eq(...)`
* Added `enum_hash(...)`
### Changed
* `Option<T>` now implements `Enum`
* `bevy_window` now depends on `bevy_reflect`
* Implemented `Reflect` and `FromReflect` for `WindowId`
* Derive `FromReflect` on `PerspectiveProjection`
* Derive `FromReflect` on `OrthographicProjection`
* Derive `FromReflect` on `WindowOrigin`
* Derive `FromReflect` on `ScalingMode`
* Derive `FromReflect` on `DepthCalculation`
## Migration Guide
* Enums no longer need to be treated as values and usages of `#[reflect_value(...)]` can be removed or replaced by `#[reflect(...)]`
* Enums (including `Option<T>`) now take a different format when serializing. The format is described above, but this may cause issues for existing scenes that make use of enums.
---
Also shout out to @nicopap for helping clean up some of the code here! It's a big feature so help like this is really appreciated!
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <gino.valente.code@gmail.com>
# Objective
Currently, actually using a `Local` on a system requires that it be `T: FromWorld`, but that requirement is only expressed on the `SystemParam` machinery, which leads to the confusing error message for when the user attempts to add an invalid system. By adding these bounds to `Local` directly, it improves clarity on usage and semantics.
## Solution
- Add `T: FromWorld` bound to `Local`'s definition
## Migration Guide
- It might be possible for references to `Local`s without `T: FromWorld` to exist, but these should be exceedingly rare and probably dead code. In the event that one of these is encountered, the easiest solutions are to delete the code or wrap the inner `T` in an `Option` to allow it to be default constructed to `None`.
# Objective
- Migrate changes from #3503.
## Solution
- Change `Size<T>` and `UiRect<T>` to `Size` and `UiRect` using `Val`.
- Implement `Sub`, `SubAssign`, `Mul`, `MulAssign`, `Div` and `DivAssign` for `Val`.
- Update tests for `Size`.
---
## Changelog
### Changed
- The generic `T` of `Size` and `UiRect` got removed and instead they both now always use `Val`.
## Migration Guide
- The generic `T` of `Size` and `UiRect` got removed and instead they both now always use `Val`. If you used a `Size<f32>` consider replacing it with a `Vec2` which is way more powerful.
Co-authored-by: KDecay <KDecayMusic@protonmail.com>
