P2010 is a single-core version of P2020. There is no P2010 target
configured. Drop related macros. P2010 SoC is still supported.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
P1017 is a single-core version of P1023. There is no P1017 target
configured. Drop related macros. P1017 SoC is still supported.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
P1014 is a variant of P1010. There is no P1014 target configured.
Drop related macros. P1014 SoC is still supported.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
P1013 is a single-core version of P1022. There is no P1022 target
configured. Drop related macros. P1022 SoC is still supported.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
P1012 is a single-core version of P1021. There is no P1012 target
configured. Drop related macros. P1012 SoC is still supported.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Replace CONFIG_BSC9131, CONFIG_BSC9132 with ARCH_BSC9131, ARCH_BSC9132
Kconfig options.
Also drop #ifdef in BSC9131RDB.h since it is redundant.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB1_PHY_ENABLE is set and the USB Phy
offset are set to enable the initial setting of Usb Phy for P1010.
Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Unlike Linux, nothing about errno.h is arch-specific in U-Boot.
As you see, all of arch/${ARCH}/include/asm/errno.h is just a
wrapper of <asm-generic/errno.h>. Actually, U-Boot does not
export headers to user-space, so we just have to care about the
consistency in the U-Boot tree.
Now all of include directives for <asm/errno.h> are gone.
Deprecate <asm/errno.h>.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
A few boards define this in a header file which is incorrect. It means that
Kconfig options that rely on this cannot be used. Move it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
A few boards define this in a header file which is incorrect. It means that
Kconfig options that rely on this cannot be used. Move it.
Note that quite a few boards defined this options but do not appear to
actually use SPL:
BSC9132QDS_NOR_DDRCLK100_SECURE
BSC9132QDS_NOR_DDRCLK133_SECURE
BSC9132QDS_SDCARD_DDRCLK100_SECURE
BSC9132QDS_SDCARD_DDRCLK133_SECURE
BSC9132QDS_SPIFLASH_DDRCLK100_SECURE
BSC9132QDS_SPIFLASH_DDRCLK133_SECURE
C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PA_NAND_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PA_NOR_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NOR_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PB_NAND_SECBOOT
P1010RDB-PB_NOR_SECBOOT
P3041DS_SECURE_BOOT
P4080DS_SECURE_BOOT
P5020DS_NAND_SECURE_BOOT
P5040DS_SECURE_BOOT
T1023RDB_SECURE_BOOT
T1024QDS_DDR4_SECURE_BOOT
T1024QDS_SECURE_BOOT
T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT
T1040RDB_SECURE_BOOT
T1042D4RDB_SECURE_BOOT
T1042RDB_SECURE_BOOT
T2080QDS_SECURE_BOOT
T2080RDB_SECURE_BOOT
T4160QDS_SECURE_BOOT
T4240QDS_SECURE_BOOT
ls1021aqds_nor_SECURE_BOOT
ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT
ls1043ardb_SECURE_BOOT
For these boards CONFIG_SPL_DM will no-longer be defined in SPL. But since
they apparently don't have an SPL, this should not matter.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The secure boot header files incorrectly define SPL options only if
CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is defined. This means that the options are only enabled
in an SPL build, and not with a normal 'make xxx_defconfig'. This means
that moveconfig.py cannot work, since it sees the options as disabled even
when they may be manually enabled in an SPL build.
Fix this by changing the order.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Up to now, the function is_serdes_configed() doesn't check if the map
of serdes protocol is initialized before accessing it. The function
is_serdes_configed() will get wrong result when it was called before
the serdes protocol maps initialized. As the first element of the map
isn't used for any device, so use it as the flag to indicate if the
map has been initialized.
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Update erratum workaround for A006379 to set register CPCHDBCR0
with value 0x001e0000, replacing the old value 0x003c0000.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Reported-by: Dave Liu <dave.liu@nxp.com>
Add support for reading bootscript and bootscript header from SD. Also
renamed macros *_FLASH to *_DEVICE to represent SD alongwith NAND and
NOR flash.
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
For mpc85xx SoCs, the core begins execution from address 0xFFFFFFFC.
In non-secure boot scenario from NAND, this address will map to CPC
configured as SRAM. But in case of secure boot, this default address
always maps to IBR (Internal Boot ROM).
The IBR code requires that the bootloader(U-boot) must lie in 0 to 3.5G
address space i.e. 0x0 - 0xDFFFFFFF.
For secure boot target from NAND, the text base for SPL is kept same as
non-secure boot target i.e. 0xFFFx_xxxx but the SPL U-boot binary will
be copied to CPC configured as SRAM with address in 0-3.5G(0xBFFC_0000)
As a the virtual and physical address of CPC would be different. The
virtual address 0xFFFx_xxxx needs to be mapped to physical address
0xBFFx_xxxx.
Create a new PBI file to configure CPC as SRAM with address 0xBFFC0000
and update DCFG SCRTACH1 register with location of Header required for
secure boot.
The changes are similar to
commit 467a40dfe3
powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND secure boot target for P3041
While P3041 has a 1MB CPC and does not require SPL. On T104x, CPC
is only 256K and thus SPL framework is used.
The changes are only applicable for SPL U-Boot running out of CPC SRAM
and not the next level U-Boot loaded on DDR.
Reviewed-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
As part of Chain of Trust for Secure boot, the SPL U-Boot will validate
the next level U-boot image. Add a new function spl_validate_uboot to
perform the validation.
Enable hardware crypto operations in SPL using SEC block.
In case of Secure Boot, PAMU is not bypassed. For allowing SEC block
access to CPC configured as SRAM, configure PAMU.
Reviewed-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Define a platform data structure for the MPC85XX GPIO driver to allow
use of the driver without device tree. Users should define the GPIO
blocks for their platform like this:
struct mpc85xx_gpio_plat gpio_blocks[] = {
{
.addr = 0x130000,
.ngpios = 32,
},
{
.addr = 0x131000,
.ngpios = 32,
},
};
U_BOOT_DEVICES(my_platform_gpios) = {
{ "gpio_mpc85xx", &gpio_blocks[0] },
{ "gpio_mpc85xx", &gpio_blocks[1] },
};
This is intended to build upon the recent submission of the base
MPC85XX driver from Mario Six. We need to use that new driver
without dts support and this patch gives us that flexibility.
This has been tested on a Freescale T2080 CPU, although only the first
GPIO block.
Signed-off-by: Hamish Martin <hamish.martin@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc>
Tested-by: Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This patch adds a driver for the built-in GPIO controller of the MPC85XX
SoC (probably supporting other PowerQUICC III SoCs as well).
Each GPIO bank is identified by its own entry in the device tree, i.e.
gpio-controller@fc00 {
#gpio-cells = <2>;
compatible = "fsl,pq3-gpio";
reg = <0xfc00 0x100>
}
By default, each bank is assumed to have 32 GPIOs, but the ngpios
setting is honored, so the number of GPIOs for each bank in configurable
to match the actual GPIO count of the SoC (e.g. the 32/32/23 banks of
the P1022 SoC).
The usual functions of GPIO drivers (setting input/output mode and output
value setting) are supported.
The driver has been tested on MPC85XX, but it is likely that other
PowerQUICC III devices will work as well.
Signed-off-by: Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
