This would highlight how active the community really is at just a glance, which is nice. It will however require an admin of the discord server to activate this under Server Settings->Widget-> enable server widget
- added some missing examples
- changed the order of a few examples (app/empty came after app/empty_default for example)
- added a table with the examples for Android and iOS, like it was done for wasm
see [`issue 1326`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/1326)
* Simplify syntax & lint. Combine apt installations into a single step. Future-proof OS selections.
* Remove caching
* Run clippy within the linux stable build. Parallelize all the builds. Cargo check is unneeded.
* build and run tests on windows and macos
* Remove AHashExt
There is little benefit of Hash*::new() over Hash*::default(), but it
does require more code that needs to be duplicated for every Hash* in
bevy_utils. It may also slightly increase compile times.
* Add StableHash* to bevy_utils
* Use StableHashMap instead of HashMap + BTreeSet for diagnostics
This is a significant reduction in the release mode compile times of
bevy_diagnostics
```
Benchmark #1: touch crates/bevy_diagnostic/src/lib.rs && cargo build --release -p bevy_diagnostic -j1
Time (mean ± σ): 3.645 s ± 0.009 s [User: 3.551 s, System: 0.094 s]
Range (min … max): 3.632 s … 3.658 s 20 runs
```
```
Benchmark #1: touch crates/bevy_diagnostic/src/lib.rs && cargo build --release -p bevy_diagnostic -j1
Time (mean ± σ): 2.938 s ± 0.012 s [User: 2.850 s, System: 0.090 s]
Range (min … max): 2.919 s … 2.969 s 20 runs
```
Relying on TypeId being some hash internally isn't future-proof because there is no guarantee about internal layout or structure of TypeId. I benchmarked TypeId noop hasher vs fxhash and found that there is very little difference.
Also fxhash is likely to be better supported because it is widely used in rustc itself.
[Benchmarks of hashers](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/1097)
[Engine wide benchmarks](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/1119#issuecomment-751361215)
Previously, if the actual value of LeftStickX was e.g. 0.034 and fluctuated a little
bit (less than the threshold) it would repeatedly send out events,
because it compared the value to the *filtered* old one - 0.0 - which is
more then `0.01` (the threshold) away.
The is fixed by first doing the deadzone and then comparing to the old
value.
Another possible solution would be to store both the actual old value
and the filtered one, but that would add complexity.
