bevy/crates/bevy_math/Cargo.toml

53 lines
1.8 KiB
TOML
Raw Normal View History

[package]
name = "bevy_math"
version = "0.14.0-dev"
edition = "2021"
description = "Provides math functionality for Bevy Engine"
homepage = "https://bevyengine.org"
repository = "https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy"
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
keywords = ["bevy"]
rust-version = "1.68.2"
[dependencies]
glam = { version = "0.27", features = ["bytemuck"] }
thiserror = "1.0"
serde = { version = "1", features = ["derive"], optional = true }
Add `Rotation2d` (#11658) # Objective Rotating vectors is a very common task. It is required for a variety of things both within Bevy itself and in many third party plugins, for example all over physics and collision detection, and for things like Bevy's bounding volumes and several gizmo implementations. For 3D, we can do this using a `Quat`, but for 2D, we do not have a clear and efficient option. `Mat2` can be used for rotating vectors if created using `Mat2::from_angle`, but this is not obvious to many users, it doesn't have many rotation helpers, and the type does not give any guarantees that it represents a valid rotation. We should have a proper type for 2D rotations. In addition to allowing for potential optimization, it would allow us to have a consistent and explicitly documented representation used throughout the engine, i.e. counterclockwise and in radians. ## Representation The mathematical formula for rotating a 2D vector is the following: ``` new_x = x * cos - y * sin new_y = x * sin + y * cos ``` Here, `sin` and `cos` are the sine and cosine of the rotation angle. Computing these every time when a vector needs to be rotated can be expensive, so the rotation shouldn't be just an `f32` angle. Instead, it is often more efficient to represent the rotation using the sine and cosine of the angle instead of storing the angle itself. This can be freely passed around and reused without unnecessary computations. The two options are either a 2x2 rotation matrix or a unit complex number where the cosine is the real part and the sine is the imaginary part. These are equivalent for the most part, but the unit complex representation is a bit more memory efficient (two `f32`s instead of four), so I chose that. This is like Nalgebra's [`UnitComplex`](https://docs.rs/nalgebra/latest/nalgebra/geometry/type.UnitComplex.html) type, which can be used for the [`Rotation2`](https://docs.rs/nalgebra/latest/nalgebra/geometry/type.Rotation2.html) type. ## Implementation Add a `Rotation2d` type represented as a unit complex number: ```rust /// A counterclockwise 2D rotation in radians. /// /// The rotation angle is wrapped to be within the `]-pi, pi]` range. pub struct Rotation2d { /// The cosine of the rotation angle in radians. /// /// This is the real part of the unit complex number representing the rotation. pub cos: f32, /// The sine of the rotation angle in radians. /// /// This is the imaginary part of the unit complex number representing the rotation. pub sin: f32, } ``` Using it is similar to using `Quat`, but in 2D: ```rust let rotation = Rotation2d::radians(PI / 2.0); // Rotate vector (also works on Direction2d!) assert_eq!(rotation * Vec2::X, Vec2::Y); // Get angle as degrees assert_eq!(rotation.as_degrees(), 90.0); // Getting sin and cos is free let (sin, cos) = rotation.sin_cos(); // "Subtract" rotations let rotation2 = Rotation2d::FRAC_PI_4; // there are constants! let diff = rotation * rotation2.inverse(); assert_eq!(diff.as_radians(), PI / 4.0); // This is equivalent to the above assert_eq!(rotation2.angle_between(rotation), PI / 4.0); // Lerp let rotation1 = Rotation2d::IDENTITY; let rotation2 = Rotation2d::FRAC_PI_2; let result = rotation1.lerp(rotation2, 0.5); assert_eq!(result.as_radians(), std::f32::consts::FRAC_PI_4); // Slerp let rotation1 = Rotation2d::FRAC_PI_4); let rotation2 = Rotation2d::degrees(-180.0); // we can use degrees too! let result = rotation1.slerp(rotation2, 1.0 / 3.0); assert_eq!(result.as_radians(), std::f32::consts::FRAC_PI_2); ``` There's also a `From<f32>` implementation for `Rotation2d`, which means that methods can still accept radians as floats if the argument uses `impl Into<Rotation2d>`. This means that adding `Rotation2d` shouldn't even be a breaking change. --- ## Changelog - Added `Rotation2d` - Bounding volume methods now take an `impl Into<Rotation2d>` - Gizmo methods with rotation now take an `impl Into<Rotation2d>` ## Future use cases - Collision detection (a type like this is quite essential considering how common vector rotations are) - `Transform` helpers (e.g. return a 2D rotation about the Z axis from a `Transform`) - The rotation used for `Transform2d` (#8268) - More gizmos, maybe meshes... everything in 2D that uses rotation --------- Co-authored-by: Tristan Guichaoua <33934311+tguichaoua@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Robert Walter <robwalter96@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: IQuick 143 <IQuick143cz@gmail.com>
2024-03-11 19:11:57 +00:00
libm = { version = "0.2", optional = true }
approx = { version = "0.5", optional = true }
rand = { version = "0.8", features = [
"alloc",
], default-features = false, optional = true }
[dev-dependencies]
approx = "0.5"
# Supply rngs for examples and tests
rand = "0.8"
rand_chacha = "0.3"
# Enable the approx feature when testing.
bevy_math = { path = ".", version = "0.14.0-dev", features = ["approx"] }
[features]
default = ["rand"]
serialize = ["dep:serde", "glam/serde"]
# Enable approx for glam types to approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions
approx = ["dep:approx", "glam/approx"]
# Enable interoperation of glam types with mint-compatible libraries
mint = ["glam/mint"]
# Enable libm mathematical functions for glam types to ensure consistent outputs
# across platforms at the cost of losing hardware-level optimization using intrinsics
Add `Rotation2d` (#11658) # Objective Rotating vectors is a very common task. It is required for a variety of things both within Bevy itself and in many third party plugins, for example all over physics and collision detection, and for things like Bevy's bounding volumes and several gizmo implementations. For 3D, we can do this using a `Quat`, but for 2D, we do not have a clear and efficient option. `Mat2` can be used for rotating vectors if created using `Mat2::from_angle`, but this is not obvious to many users, it doesn't have many rotation helpers, and the type does not give any guarantees that it represents a valid rotation. We should have a proper type for 2D rotations. In addition to allowing for potential optimization, it would allow us to have a consistent and explicitly documented representation used throughout the engine, i.e. counterclockwise and in radians. ## Representation The mathematical formula for rotating a 2D vector is the following: ``` new_x = x * cos - y * sin new_y = x * sin + y * cos ``` Here, `sin` and `cos` are the sine and cosine of the rotation angle. Computing these every time when a vector needs to be rotated can be expensive, so the rotation shouldn't be just an `f32` angle. Instead, it is often more efficient to represent the rotation using the sine and cosine of the angle instead of storing the angle itself. This can be freely passed around and reused without unnecessary computations. The two options are either a 2x2 rotation matrix or a unit complex number where the cosine is the real part and the sine is the imaginary part. These are equivalent for the most part, but the unit complex representation is a bit more memory efficient (two `f32`s instead of four), so I chose that. This is like Nalgebra's [`UnitComplex`](https://docs.rs/nalgebra/latest/nalgebra/geometry/type.UnitComplex.html) type, which can be used for the [`Rotation2`](https://docs.rs/nalgebra/latest/nalgebra/geometry/type.Rotation2.html) type. ## Implementation Add a `Rotation2d` type represented as a unit complex number: ```rust /// A counterclockwise 2D rotation in radians. /// /// The rotation angle is wrapped to be within the `]-pi, pi]` range. pub struct Rotation2d { /// The cosine of the rotation angle in radians. /// /// This is the real part of the unit complex number representing the rotation. pub cos: f32, /// The sine of the rotation angle in radians. /// /// This is the imaginary part of the unit complex number representing the rotation. pub sin: f32, } ``` Using it is similar to using `Quat`, but in 2D: ```rust let rotation = Rotation2d::radians(PI / 2.0); // Rotate vector (also works on Direction2d!) assert_eq!(rotation * Vec2::X, Vec2::Y); // Get angle as degrees assert_eq!(rotation.as_degrees(), 90.0); // Getting sin and cos is free let (sin, cos) = rotation.sin_cos(); // "Subtract" rotations let rotation2 = Rotation2d::FRAC_PI_4; // there are constants! let diff = rotation * rotation2.inverse(); assert_eq!(diff.as_radians(), PI / 4.0); // This is equivalent to the above assert_eq!(rotation2.angle_between(rotation), PI / 4.0); // Lerp let rotation1 = Rotation2d::IDENTITY; let rotation2 = Rotation2d::FRAC_PI_2; let result = rotation1.lerp(rotation2, 0.5); assert_eq!(result.as_radians(), std::f32::consts::FRAC_PI_4); // Slerp let rotation1 = Rotation2d::FRAC_PI_4); let rotation2 = Rotation2d::degrees(-180.0); // we can use degrees too! let result = rotation1.slerp(rotation2, 1.0 / 3.0); assert_eq!(result.as_radians(), std::f32::consts::FRAC_PI_2); ``` There's also a `From<f32>` implementation for `Rotation2d`, which means that methods can still accept radians as floats if the argument uses `impl Into<Rotation2d>`. This means that adding `Rotation2d` shouldn't even be a breaking change. --- ## Changelog - Added `Rotation2d` - Bounding volume methods now take an `impl Into<Rotation2d>` - Gizmo methods with rotation now take an `impl Into<Rotation2d>` ## Future use cases - Collision detection (a type like this is quite essential considering how common vector rotations are) - `Transform` helpers (e.g. return a 2D rotation about the Z axis from a `Transform`) - The rotation used for `Transform2d` (#8268) - More gizmos, maybe meshes... everything in 2D that uses rotation --------- Co-authored-by: Tristan Guichaoua <33934311+tguichaoua@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Robert Walter <robwalter96@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: IQuick 143 <IQuick143cz@gmail.com>
2024-03-11 19:11:57 +00:00
libm = ["dep:libm", "glam/libm"]
# Enable assertions to check the validity of parameters passed to glam
glam_assert = ["glam/glam-assert"]
# Enable assertions in debug builds to check the validity of parameters passed to glam
debug_glam_assert = ["glam/debug-glam-assert"]
# Enable the rand dependency for shape_sampling
Random sampling of directions and quaternions (#12857) # Objective Augment Bevy's random sampling capabilities by providing good tools for producing random directions and rotations. ## Solution The `rand` crate has a natural tool for providing `Distribution`s whose output is a type that doesn't require any additional data to sample values — namely, [`Standard`](https://docs.rs/rand/latest/rand/distributions/struct.Standard.html). Here, our existing `ShapeSample` implementations have been put to good use in providing these, resulting in patterns like the following: ```rust // Using thread-local rng let random_direction1: Dir3 = random(); // Using an explicit rng let random_direction2: Dir3 = rng.gen(); // Using an explicit rng coupled explicitly with Standard let random_directions: Vec<Dir3> = rng.sample_iter(Standard).take(5).collect(); ``` Furthermore, we have introduced a trait `FromRng` which provides sugar for `rng.gen()` that is more namespace-friendly (in this author's opinion): ```rust let random_direction = Dir3::from_rng(rng); ``` The types this has been implemented for are `Dir2`, `Dir3`, `Dir3A`, and `Quat`. Notably, `Quat` uses `glam`'s implementation rather than an in-house one, and as a result, `bevy_math`'s "rand" feature now enables that of `glam`. --- ## Changelog - Created `standard` submodule in `sampling` to hold implementations and other items related to the `Standard` distribution. - "rand" feature of `bevy_math` now enables that of `glam`. --- ## Discussion From a quick glance at `Quat`'s distribution implementation in `glam`, I am a bit suspicious, since it is simple and doesn't match any algorithm that I came across in my research. I will do a little more digging as a follow-up to this and see if it's actually uniform (maybe even using those tools I wrote — what a thrill). As an aside, I'd also like to say that I think [`Distribution`](https://docs.rs/rand/latest/rand/distributions/trait.Distribution.html) is really, really good. It integrates with distributions provided externally (e.g. in `rand` itself and its extensions) along with doing a good job of isolating the source of randomness, so that output can be reliably reproduced if need be. Finally, `Distribution::sample_iter` is quite good for ergonomically acquiring lots of random values. At one point I found myself writing traits to describe random sampling and essentially reinvented this one. I just think it's good, and I think it's worth centralizing around to a significant extent.
2024-04-04 23:13:00 +00:00
rand = ["dep:rand", "glam/rand"]
[lints]
workspace = true
[package.metadata.docs.rs]
rustdoc-args = ["-Zunstable-options", "--cfg", "docsrs"]
all-features = true