bevy/crates/bevy_sprite/src/mesh2d/material.rs

604 lines
21 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use bevy_app::{App, Plugin};
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
use bevy_asset::{AddAsset, AssetEvent, AssetServer, Assets, Handle};
use bevy_core_pipeline::{
core_2d::Transparent2d,
tonemapping::{DebandDither, Tonemapping},
};
Make `Resource` trait opt-in, requiring `#[derive(Resource)]` V2 (#5577) *This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.* # Objective Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds. While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks: * it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource * it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource * we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component). * dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways * raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values * we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor ## Notes to reviewers * Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits. *ira: My commits are not as well organized :')* * I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does. * I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981. ## Changelog `Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro. ## Migration Guide Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource. If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics. `ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing. Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead. Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-08-08 21:36:35 +00:00
use bevy_derive::{Deref, DerefMut};
use bevy_ecs::{
Migrate engine to Schedule v3 (#7267) Huge thanks to @maniwani, @devil-ira, @hymm, @cart, @superdump and @jakobhellermann for the help with this PR. # Objective - Followup #6587. - Minimal integration for the Stageless Scheduling RFC: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/45 ## Solution - [x] Remove old scheduling module - [x] Migrate new methods to no longer use extension methods - [x] Fix compiler errors - [x] Fix benchmarks - [x] Fix examples - [x] Fix docs - [x] Fix tests ## Changelog ### Added - a large number of methods on `App` to work with schedules ergonomically - the `CoreSchedule` enum - `App::add_extract_system` via the `RenderingAppExtension` trait extension method - the private `prepare_view_uniforms` system now has a public system set for scheduling purposes, called `ViewSet::PrepareUniforms` ### Removed - stages, and all code that mentions stages - states have been dramatically simplified, and no longer use a stack - `RunCriteriaLabel` - `AsSystemLabel` trait - `on_hierarchy_reports_enabled` run criteria (now just uses an ad hoc resource checking run condition) - systems in `RenderSet/Stage::Extract` no longer warn when they do not read data from the main world - `RunCriteriaLabel` - `transform_propagate_system_set`: this was a nonstandard pattern that didn't actually provide enough control. The systems are already `pub`: the docs have been updated to ensure that the third-party usage is clear. ### Changed - `System::default_labels` is now `System::default_system_sets`. - `App::add_default_labels` is now `App::add_default_sets` - `CoreStage` and `StartupStage` enums are now `CoreSet` and `StartupSet` - `App::add_system_set` was renamed to `App::add_systems` - The `StartupSchedule` label is now defined as part of the `CoreSchedules` enum - `.label(SystemLabel)` is now referred to as `.in_set(SystemSet)` - `SystemLabel` trait was replaced by `SystemSet` - `SystemTypeIdLabel<T>` was replaced by `SystemSetType<T>` - The `ReportHierarchyIssue` resource now has a public constructor (`new`), and implements `PartialEq` - Fixed time steps now use a schedule (`CoreSchedule::FixedTimeStep`) rather than a run criteria. - Adding rendering extraction systems now panics rather than silently failing if no subapp with the `RenderApp` label is found. - the `calculate_bounds` system, with the `CalculateBounds` label, is now in `CoreSet::Update`, rather than in `CoreSet::PostUpdate` before commands are applied. - `SceneSpawnerSystem` now runs under `CoreSet::Update`, rather than `CoreStage::PreUpdate.at_end()`. - `bevy_pbr::add_clusters` is no longer an exclusive system - the top level `bevy_ecs::schedule` module was replaced with `bevy_ecs::scheduling` - `tick_global_task_pools_on_main_thread` is no longer run as an exclusive system. Instead, it has been replaced by `tick_global_task_pools`, which uses a `NonSend` resource to force running on the main thread. ## Migration Guide - Calls to `.label(MyLabel)` should be replaced with `.in_set(MySet)` - Stages have been removed. Replace these with system sets, and then add command flushes using the `apply_system_buffers` exclusive system where needed. - The `CoreStage`, `StartupStage, `RenderStage` and `AssetStage` enums have been replaced with `CoreSet`, `StartupSet, `RenderSet` and `AssetSet`. The same scheduling guarantees have been preserved. - Systems are no longer added to `CoreSet::Update` by default. Add systems manually if this behavior is needed, although you should consider adding your game logic systems to `CoreSchedule::FixedTimestep` instead for more reliable framerate-independent behavior. - Similarly, startup systems are no longer part of `StartupSet::Startup` by default. In most cases, this won't matter to you. - For example, `add_system_to_stage(CoreStage::PostUpdate, my_system)` should be replaced with - `add_system(my_system.in_set(CoreSet::PostUpdate)` - When testing systems or otherwise running them in a headless fashion, simply construct and run a schedule using `Schedule::new()` and `World::run_schedule` rather than constructing stages - Run criteria have been renamed to run conditions. These can now be combined with each other and with states. - Looping run criteria and state stacks have been removed. Use an exclusive system that runs a schedule if you need this level of control over system control flow. - For app-level control flow over which schedules get run when (such as for rollback networking), create your own schedule and insert it under the `CoreSchedule::Outer` label. - Fixed timesteps are now evaluated in a schedule, rather than controlled via run criteria. The `run_fixed_timestep` system runs this schedule between `CoreSet::First` and `CoreSet::PreUpdate` by default. - Command flush points introduced by `AssetStage` have been removed. If you were relying on these, add them back manually. - Adding extract systems is now typically done directly on the main app. Make sure the `RenderingAppExtension` trait is in scope, then call `app.add_extract_system(my_system)`. - the `calculate_bounds` system, with the `CalculateBounds` label, is now in `CoreSet::Update`, rather than in `CoreSet::PostUpdate` before commands are applied. You may need to order your movement systems to occur before this system in order to avoid system order ambiguities in culling behavior. - the `RenderLabel` `AppLabel` was renamed to `RenderApp` for clarity - `App::add_state` now takes 0 arguments: the starting state is set based on the `Default` impl. - Instead of creating `SystemSet` containers for systems that run in stages, simply use `.on_enter::<State::Variant>()` or its `on_exit` or `on_update` siblings. - `SystemLabel` derives should be replaced with `SystemSet`. You will also need to add the `Debug`, `PartialEq`, `Eq`, and `Hash` traits to satisfy the new trait bounds. - `with_run_criteria` has been renamed to `run_if`. Run criteria have been renamed to run conditions for clarity, and should now simply return a bool. - States have been dramatically simplified: there is no longer a "state stack". To queue a transition to the next state, call `NextState::set` ## TODO - [x] remove dead methods on App and World - [x] add `App::add_system_to_schedule` and `App::add_systems_to_schedule` - [x] avoid adding the default system set at inappropriate times - [x] remove any accidental cycles in the default plugins schedule - [x] migrate benchmarks - [x] expose explicit labels for the built-in command flush points - [x] migrate engine code - [x] remove all mentions of stages from the docs - [x] verify docs for States - [x] fix uses of exclusive systems that use .end / .at_start / .before_commands - [x] migrate RenderStage and AssetStage - [x] migrate examples - [x] ensure that transform propagation is exported in a sufficiently public way (the systems are already pub) - [x] ensure that on_enter schedules are run at least once before the main app - [x] re-enable opt-in to execution order ambiguities - [x] revert change to `update_bounds` to ensure it runs in `PostUpdate` - [x] test all examples - [x] unbreak directional lights - [x] unbreak shadows (see 3d_scene, 3d_shape, lighting, transparaency_3d examples) - [x] game menu example shows loading screen and menu simultaneously - [x] display settings menu is a blank screen - [x] `without_winit` example panics - [x] ensure all tests pass - [x] SubApp doc test fails - [x] runs_spawn_local tasks fails - [x] [Fix panic_when_hierachy_cycle test hanging](https://github.com/alice-i-cecile/bevy/pull/120) ## Points of Difficulty and Controversy **Reviewers, please give feedback on these and look closely** 1. Default sets, from the RFC, have been removed. These added a tremendous amount of implicit complexity and result in hard to debug scheduling errors. They're going to be tackled in the form of "base sets" by @cart in a followup. 2. The outer schedule controls which schedule is run when `App::update` is called. 3. I implemented `Label for `Box<dyn Label>` for our label types. This enables us to store schedule labels in concrete form, and then later run them. I ran into the same set of problems when working with one-shot systems. We've previously investigated this pattern in depth, and it does not appear to lead to extra indirection with nested boxes. 4. `SubApp::update` simply runs the default schedule once. This sucks, but this whole API is incomplete and this was the minimal changeset. 5. `time_system` and `tick_global_task_pools_on_main_thread` no longer use exclusive systems to attempt to force scheduling order 6. Implemetnation strategy for fixed timesteps 7. `AssetStage` was migrated to `AssetSet` without reintroducing command flush points. These did not appear to be used, and it's nice to remove these bottlenecks. 8. Migration of `bevy_render/lib.rs` and pipelined rendering. The logic here is unusually tricky, as we have complex scheduling requirements. ## Future Work (ideally before 0.10) - Rename schedule_v3 module to schedule or scheduling - Add a derive macro to states, and likely a `EnumIter` trait of some form - Figure out what exactly to do with the "systems added should basically work by default" problem - Improve ergonomics for working with fixed timesteps and states - Polish FixedTime API to match Time - Rebase and merge #7415 - Resolve all internal ambiguities (blocked on better tools, especially #7442) - Add "base sets" to replace the removed default sets.
2023-02-06 02:04:50 +00:00
prelude::*,
query::ROQueryItem,
system::{
lifetimeless::{Read, SRes},
Migrate engine to Schedule v3 (#7267) Huge thanks to @maniwani, @devil-ira, @hymm, @cart, @superdump and @jakobhellermann for the help with this PR. # Objective - Followup #6587. - Minimal integration for the Stageless Scheduling RFC: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/45 ## Solution - [x] Remove old scheduling module - [x] Migrate new methods to no longer use extension methods - [x] Fix compiler errors - [x] Fix benchmarks - [x] Fix examples - [x] Fix docs - [x] Fix tests ## Changelog ### Added - a large number of methods on `App` to work with schedules ergonomically - the `CoreSchedule` enum - `App::add_extract_system` via the `RenderingAppExtension` trait extension method - the private `prepare_view_uniforms` system now has a public system set for scheduling purposes, called `ViewSet::PrepareUniforms` ### Removed - stages, and all code that mentions stages - states have been dramatically simplified, and no longer use a stack - `RunCriteriaLabel` - `AsSystemLabel` trait - `on_hierarchy_reports_enabled` run criteria (now just uses an ad hoc resource checking run condition) - systems in `RenderSet/Stage::Extract` no longer warn when they do not read data from the main world - `RunCriteriaLabel` - `transform_propagate_system_set`: this was a nonstandard pattern that didn't actually provide enough control. The systems are already `pub`: the docs have been updated to ensure that the third-party usage is clear. ### Changed - `System::default_labels` is now `System::default_system_sets`. - `App::add_default_labels` is now `App::add_default_sets` - `CoreStage` and `StartupStage` enums are now `CoreSet` and `StartupSet` - `App::add_system_set` was renamed to `App::add_systems` - The `StartupSchedule` label is now defined as part of the `CoreSchedules` enum - `.label(SystemLabel)` is now referred to as `.in_set(SystemSet)` - `SystemLabel` trait was replaced by `SystemSet` - `SystemTypeIdLabel<T>` was replaced by `SystemSetType<T>` - The `ReportHierarchyIssue` resource now has a public constructor (`new`), and implements `PartialEq` - Fixed time steps now use a schedule (`CoreSchedule::FixedTimeStep`) rather than a run criteria. - Adding rendering extraction systems now panics rather than silently failing if no subapp with the `RenderApp` label is found. - the `calculate_bounds` system, with the `CalculateBounds` label, is now in `CoreSet::Update`, rather than in `CoreSet::PostUpdate` before commands are applied. - `SceneSpawnerSystem` now runs under `CoreSet::Update`, rather than `CoreStage::PreUpdate.at_end()`. - `bevy_pbr::add_clusters` is no longer an exclusive system - the top level `bevy_ecs::schedule` module was replaced with `bevy_ecs::scheduling` - `tick_global_task_pools_on_main_thread` is no longer run as an exclusive system. Instead, it has been replaced by `tick_global_task_pools`, which uses a `NonSend` resource to force running on the main thread. ## Migration Guide - Calls to `.label(MyLabel)` should be replaced with `.in_set(MySet)` - Stages have been removed. Replace these with system sets, and then add command flushes using the `apply_system_buffers` exclusive system where needed. - The `CoreStage`, `StartupStage, `RenderStage` and `AssetStage` enums have been replaced with `CoreSet`, `StartupSet, `RenderSet` and `AssetSet`. The same scheduling guarantees have been preserved. - Systems are no longer added to `CoreSet::Update` by default. Add systems manually if this behavior is needed, although you should consider adding your game logic systems to `CoreSchedule::FixedTimestep` instead for more reliable framerate-independent behavior. - Similarly, startup systems are no longer part of `StartupSet::Startup` by default. In most cases, this won't matter to you. - For example, `add_system_to_stage(CoreStage::PostUpdate, my_system)` should be replaced with - `add_system(my_system.in_set(CoreSet::PostUpdate)` - When testing systems or otherwise running them in a headless fashion, simply construct and run a schedule using `Schedule::new()` and `World::run_schedule` rather than constructing stages - Run criteria have been renamed to run conditions. These can now be combined with each other and with states. - Looping run criteria and state stacks have been removed. Use an exclusive system that runs a schedule if you need this level of control over system control flow. - For app-level control flow over which schedules get run when (such as for rollback networking), create your own schedule and insert it under the `CoreSchedule::Outer` label. - Fixed timesteps are now evaluated in a schedule, rather than controlled via run criteria. The `run_fixed_timestep` system runs this schedule between `CoreSet::First` and `CoreSet::PreUpdate` by default. - Command flush points introduced by `AssetStage` have been removed. If you were relying on these, add them back manually. - Adding extract systems is now typically done directly on the main app. Make sure the `RenderingAppExtension` trait is in scope, then call `app.add_extract_system(my_system)`. - the `calculate_bounds` system, with the `CalculateBounds` label, is now in `CoreSet::Update`, rather than in `CoreSet::PostUpdate` before commands are applied. You may need to order your movement systems to occur before this system in order to avoid system order ambiguities in culling behavior. - the `RenderLabel` `AppLabel` was renamed to `RenderApp` for clarity - `App::add_state` now takes 0 arguments: the starting state is set based on the `Default` impl. - Instead of creating `SystemSet` containers for systems that run in stages, simply use `.on_enter::<State::Variant>()` or its `on_exit` or `on_update` siblings. - `SystemLabel` derives should be replaced with `SystemSet`. You will also need to add the `Debug`, `PartialEq`, `Eq`, and `Hash` traits to satisfy the new trait bounds. - `with_run_criteria` has been renamed to `run_if`. Run criteria have been renamed to run conditions for clarity, and should now simply return a bool. - States have been dramatically simplified: there is no longer a "state stack". To queue a transition to the next state, call `NextState::set` ## TODO - [x] remove dead methods on App and World - [x] add `App::add_system_to_schedule` and `App::add_systems_to_schedule` - [x] avoid adding the default system set at inappropriate times - [x] remove any accidental cycles in the default plugins schedule - [x] migrate benchmarks - [x] expose explicit labels for the built-in command flush points - [x] migrate engine code - [x] remove all mentions of stages from the docs - [x] verify docs for States - [x] fix uses of exclusive systems that use .end / .at_start / .before_commands - [x] migrate RenderStage and AssetStage - [x] migrate examples - [x] ensure that transform propagation is exported in a sufficiently public way (the systems are already pub) - [x] ensure that on_enter schedules are run at least once before the main app - [x] re-enable opt-in to execution order ambiguities - [x] revert change to `update_bounds` to ensure it runs in `PostUpdate` - [x] test all examples - [x] unbreak directional lights - [x] unbreak shadows (see 3d_scene, 3d_shape, lighting, transparaency_3d examples) - [x] game menu example shows loading screen and menu simultaneously - [x] display settings menu is a blank screen - [x] `without_winit` example panics - [x] ensure all tests pass - [x] SubApp doc test fails - [x] runs_spawn_local tasks fails - [x] [Fix panic_when_hierachy_cycle test hanging](https://github.com/alice-i-cecile/bevy/pull/120) ## Points of Difficulty and Controversy **Reviewers, please give feedback on these and look closely** 1. Default sets, from the RFC, have been removed. These added a tremendous amount of implicit complexity and result in hard to debug scheduling errors. They're going to be tackled in the form of "base sets" by @cart in a followup. 2. The outer schedule controls which schedule is run when `App::update` is called. 3. I implemented `Label for `Box<dyn Label>` for our label types. This enables us to store schedule labels in concrete form, and then later run them. I ran into the same set of problems when working with one-shot systems. We've previously investigated this pattern in depth, and it does not appear to lead to extra indirection with nested boxes. 4. `SubApp::update` simply runs the default schedule once. This sucks, but this whole API is incomplete and this was the minimal changeset. 5. `time_system` and `tick_global_task_pools_on_main_thread` no longer use exclusive systems to attempt to force scheduling order 6. Implemetnation strategy for fixed timesteps 7. `AssetStage` was migrated to `AssetSet` without reintroducing command flush points. These did not appear to be used, and it's nice to remove these bottlenecks. 8. Migration of `bevy_render/lib.rs` and pipelined rendering. The logic here is unusually tricky, as we have complex scheduling requirements. ## Future Work (ideally before 0.10) - Rename schedule_v3 module to schedule or scheduling - Add a derive macro to states, and likely a `EnumIter` trait of some form - Figure out what exactly to do with the "systems added should basically work by default" problem - Improve ergonomics for working with fixed timesteps and states - Polish FixedTime API to match Time - Rebase and merge #7415 - Resolve all internal ambiguities (blocked on better tools, especially #7442) - Add "base sets" to replace the removed default sets.
2023-02-06 02:04:50 +00:00
SystemParamItem,
},
};
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
use bevy_log::error;
reflect: stable type path v2 (#7184) # Objective - Introduce a stable alternative to [`std::any::type_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/fn.type_name.html). - Rewrite of #5805 with heavy inspiration in design. - On the path to #5830. - Part of solving #3327. ## Solution - Add a `TypePath` trait for static stable type path/name information. - Add a `TypePath` derive macro. - Add a `impl_type_path` macro for implementing internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. --- ## Changelog - Added `TypePath` trait. - Added `DynamicTypePath` trait and `get_type_path` method to `Reflect`. - Added a `TypePath` derive macro. - Added a `bevy_reflect::impl_type_path` for implementing `TypePath` on internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. - Changed `bevy_reflect::utility::(Non)GenericTypeInfoCell` to `(Non)GenericTypedCell<T>` which allows us to be generic over both `TypeInfo` and `TypePath`. - `TypePath` is now a supertrait of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d`. - `impl_reflect_struct` needs a `#[type_path = "..."]` attribute to be specified. - `impl_reflect_value` needs to either specify path starting with a double colon (`::core::option::Option`) or an `in my_crate::foo` declaration. - Added `bevy_reflect_derive::ReflectTypePath`. - Most uses of `Ident` in `bevy_reflect_derive` changed to use `ReflectTypePath`. ## Migration Guide - Implementors of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d` now also need to derive `TypePath`. - Manual implementors of `Reflect` will need to implement the new `get_type_path` method. ## Open Questions - [x] ~This PR currently does not migrate any usages of `std::any::type_name` to use `bevy_reflect::TypePath` to ease the review process. Should it?~ Migration will be left to a follow-up PR. - [ ] This PR adds a lot of `#[derive(TypePath)]` and `T: TypePath` to satisfy new bounds, mostly when deriving `TypeUuid`. Should we make `TypePath` a supertrait of `TypeUuid`? [Should we remove `TypeUuid` in favour of `TypePath`?](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5805/files/2afbd855327c4b68e0a6b6f03118f289988441a4#r961067892)
2023-06-05 20:31:20 +00:00
use bevy_reflect::{TypePath, TypeUuid};
use bevy_render::{
extract_component::ExtractComponentPlugin,
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
mesh::{Mesh, MeshVertexBufferLayout},
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
prelude::Image,
Reorder render sets, refactor bevy_sprite to take advantage (#9236) This is a continuation of this PR: #8062 # Objective - Reorder render schedule sets to allow data preparation when phase item order is known to support improved batching - Part of the batching/instancing etc plan from here: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/89#issuecomment-1379249074 - The original idea came from @inodentry and proved to be a good one. Thanks! - Refactor `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` to take advantage of the new ordering ## Solution - Move `Prepare` and `PrepareFlush` after `PhaseSortFlush` - Add a `PrepareAssets` set that runs in parallel with other systems and sets in the render schedule. - Put prepare_assets systems in the `PrepareAssets` set - If explicit dependencies are needed on Mesh or Material RenderAssets then depend on the appropriate system. - Add `ManageViews` and `ManageViewsFlush` sets between `ExtractCommands` and Queue - Move `queue_mesh*_bind_group` to the Prepare stage - Rename them to `prepare_` - Put systems that prepare resources (buffers, textures, etc.) into a `PrepareResources` set inside `Prepare` - Put the `prepare_..._bind_group` systems into a `PrepareBindGroup` set after `PrepareResources` - Move `prepare_lights` to the `ManageViews` set - `prepare_lights` creates views and this must happen before `Queue` - This system needs refactoring to stop handling all responsibilities - Gather lights, sort, and create shadow map views. Store sorted light entities in a resource - Remove `BatchedPhaseItem` - Replace `batch_range` with `batch_size` representing how many items to skip after rendering the item or to skip the item entirely if `batch_size` is 0. - `queue_sprites` has been split into `queue_sprites` for queueing phase items and `prepare_sprites` for batching after the `PhaseSort` - `PhaseItem`s are still inserted in `queue_sprites` - After sorting adjacent compatible sprite phase items are accumulated into `SpriteBatch` components on the first entity of each batch, containing a range of vertex indices. The associated `PhaseItem`'s `batch_size` is updated appropriately. - `SpriteBatch` items are then drawn skipping over the other items in the batch based on the value in `batch_size` - A very similar refactor was performed on `bevy_ui` --- ## Changelog Changed: - Reordered and reworked render app schedule sets. The main change is that data is extracted, queued, sorted, and then prepared when the order of data is known. - Refactor `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` to take advantage of the reordering. ## Migration Guide - Assets such as materials and meshes should now be created in `PrepareAssets` e.g. `prepare_assets<Mesh>` - Queueing entities to `RenderPhase`s continues to be done in `Queue` e.g. `queue_sprites` - Preparing resources (textures, buffers, etc.) should now be done in `PrepareResources`, e.g. `prepare_prepass_textures`, `prepare_mesh_uniforms` - Prepare bind groups should now be done in `PrepareBindGroups` e.g. `prepare_mesh_bind_group` - Any batching or instancing can now be done in `Prepare` where the order of the phase items is known e.g. `prepare_sprites` ## Next Steps - Introduce some generic mechanism to ensure items that can be batched are grouped in the phase item order, currently you could easily have `[sprite at z 0, mesh at z 0, sprite at z 0]` preventing batching. - Investigate improved orderings for building the MeshUniform buffer - Implementing batching across the rest of bevy --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: robtfm <50659922+robtfm@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-08-27 14:33:49 +00:00
render_asset::{prepare_assets, RenderAssets},
render_phase::{
AddRenderCommand, DrawFunctions, PhaseItem, RenderCommand, RenderCommandResult,
RenderPhase, SetItemPipeline, TrackedRenderPass,
},
render_resource::{
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
AsBindGroup, AsBindGroupError, BindGroup, BindGroupLayout, OwnedBindingResource,
PipelineCache, RenderPipelineDescriptor, Shader, ShaderRef, SpecializedMeshPipeline,
SpecializedMeshPipelineError, SpecializedMeshPipelines,
},
renderer::RenderDevice,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
texture::FallbackImage,
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
view::{ComputedVisibility, ExtractedView, Msaa, Visibility, VisibleEntities},
Extract, ExtractSchedule, Render, RenderApp, RenderSet,
};
use bevy_transform::components::{GlobalTransform, Transform};
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
use bevy_utils::{FloatOrd, HashMap, HashSet};
use std::hash::Hash;
use std::marker::PhantomData;
use crate::{
DrawMesh2d, Mesh2dHandle, Mesh2dPipeline, Mesh2dPipelineKey, Mesh2dUniform, SetMesh2dBindGroup,
SetMesh2dViewBindGroup,
};
/// Materials are used alongside [`Material2dPlugin`] and [`MaterialMesh2dBundle`]
/// to spawn entities that are rendered with a specific [`Material2d`] type. They serve as an easy to use high level
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// way to render [`Mesh2dHandle`] entities with custom shader logic.
///
/// Material2ds must implement [`AsBindGroup`] to define how data will be transferred to the GPU and bound in shaders.
/// [`AsBindGroup`] can be derived, which makes generating bindings straightforward. See the [`AsBindGroup`] docs for details.
///
/// Materials must also implement [`TypeUuid`] so they can be treated as an [`Asset`](bevy_asset::Asset).
///
/// # Example
///
/// Here is a simple Material2d implementation. The [`AsBindGroup`] derive has many features. To see what else is available,
/// check out the [`AsBindGroup`] documentation.
/// ```
/// # use bevy_sprite::{Material2d, MaterialMesh2dBundle};
/// # use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
reflect: stable type path v2 (#7184) # Objective - Introduce a stable alternative to [`std::any::type_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/fn.type_name.html). - Rewrite of #5805 with heavy inspiration in design. - On the path to #5830. - Part of solving #3327. ## Solution - Add a `TypePath` trait for static stable type path/name information. - Add a `TypePath` derive macro. - Add a `impl_type_path` macro for implementing internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. --- ## Changelog - Added `TypePath` trait. - Added `DynamicTypePath` trait and `get_type_path` method to `Reflect`. - Added a `TypePath` derive macro. - Added a `bevy_reflect::impl_type_path` for implementing `TypePath` on internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. - Changed `bevy_reflect::utility::(Non)GenericTypeInfoCell` to `(Non)GenericTypedCell<T>` which allows us to be generic over both `TypeInfo` and `TypePath`. - `TypePath` is now a supertrait of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d`. - `impl_reflect_struct` needs a `#[type_path = "..."]` attribute to be specified. - `impl_reflect_value` needs to either specify path starting with a double colon (`::core::option::Option`) or an `in my_crate::foo` declaration. - Added `bevy_reflect_derive::ReflectTypePath`. - Most uses of `Ident` in `bevy_reflect_derive` changed to use `ReflectTypePath`. ## Migration Guide - Implementors of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d` now also need to derive `TypePath`. - Manual implementors of `Reflect` will need to implement the new `get_type_path` method. ## Open Questions - [x] ~This PR currently does not migrate any usages of `std::any::type_name` to use `bevy_reflect::TypePath` to ease the review process. Should it?~ Migration will be left to a follow-up PR. - [ ] This PR adds a lot of `#[derive(TypePath)]` and `T: TypePath` to satisfy new bounds, mostly when deriving `TypeUuid`. Should we make `TypePath` a supertrait of `TypeUuid`? [Should we remove `TypeUuid` in favour of `TypePath`?](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5805/files/2afbd855327c4b68e0a6b6f03118f289988441a4#r961067892)
2023-06-05 20:31:20 +00:00
/// # use bevy_reflect::{TypeUuid, TypePath};
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// # use bevy_render::{render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, texture::Image, color::Color};
/// # use bevy_asset::{Handle, AssetServer, Assets};
///
reflect: stable type path v2 (#7184) # Objective - Introduce a stable alternative to [`std::any::type_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/fn.type_name.html). - Rewrite of #5805 with heavy inspiration in design. - On the path to #5830. - Part of solving #3327. ## Solution - Add a `TypePath` trait for static stable type path/name information. - Add a `TypePath` derive macro. - Add a `impl_type_path` macro for implementing internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. --- ## Changelog - Added `TypePath` trait. - Added `DynamicTypePath` trait and `get_type_path` method to `Reflect`. - Added a `TypePath` derive macro. - Added a `bevy_reflect::impl_type_path` for implementing `TypePath` on internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. - Changed `bevy_reflect::utility::(Non)GenericTypeInfoCell` to `(Non)GenericTypedCell<T>` which allows us to be generic over both `TypeInfo` and `TypePath`. - `TypePath` is now a supertrait of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d`. - `impl_reflect_struct` needs a `#[type_path = "..."]` attribute to be specified. - `impl_reflect_value` needs to either specify path starting with a double colon (`::core::option::Option`) or an `in my_crate::foo` declaration. - Added `bevy_reflect_derive::ReflectTypePath`. - Most uses of `Ident` in `bevy_reflect_derive` changed to use `ReflectTypePath`. ## Migration Guide - Implementors of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d` now also need to derive `TypePath`. - Manual implementors of `Reflect` will need to implement the new `get_type_path` method. ## Open Questions - [x] ~This PR currently does not migrate any usages of `std::any::type_name` to use `bevy_reflect::TypePath` to ease the review process. Should it?~ Migration will be left to a follow-up PR. - [ ] This PR adds a lot of `#[derive(TypePath)]` and `T: TypePath` to satisfy new bounds, mostly when deriving `TypeUuid`. Should we make `TypePath` a supertrait of `TypeUuid`? [Should we remove `TypeUuid` in favour of `TypePath`?](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5805/files/2afbd855327c4b68e0a6b6f03118f289988441a4#r961067892)
2023-06-05 20:31:20 +00:00
/// #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, TypePath, Debug, Clone)]
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"]
/// pub struct CustomMaterial {
/// // Uniform bindings must implement `ShaderType`, which will be used to convert the value to
/// // its shader-compatible equivalent. Most core math types already implement `ShaderType`.
/// #[uniform(0)]
/// color: Color,
/// // Images can be bound as textures in shaders. If the Image's sampler is also needed, just
/// // add the sampler attribute with a different binding index.
/// #[texture(1)]
/// #[sampler(2)]
/// color_texture: Handle<Image>,
/// }
///
/// // All functions on `Material2d` have default impls. You only need to implement the
/// // functions that are relevant for your material.
/// impl Material2d for CustomMaterial {
/// fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
/// "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into()
/// }
/// }
///
/// // Spawn an entity using `CustomMaterial`.
/// fn setup(mut commands: Commands, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) {
Spawn now takes a Bundle (#6054) # Objective Now that we can consolidate Bundles and Components under a single insert (thanks to #2975 and #6039), almost 100% of world spawns now look like `world.spawn().insert((Some, Tuple, Here))`. Spawning an entity without any components is an extremely uncommon pattern, so it makes sense to give spawn the "first class" ergonomic api. This consolidated api should be made consistent across all spawn apis (such as World and Commands). ## Solution All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input: ```rust // before: commands .spawn() .insert((A, B, C)); world .spawn() .insert((A, B, C); // after commands.spawn((A, B, C)); world.spawn((A, B, C)); ``` All existing instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api. A new `spawn_empty` has been added, replacing the old `spawn` api. By allowing `world.spawn(some_bundle)` to replace `world.spawn().insert(some_bundle)`, this opened the door to removing the initial entity allocation in the "empty" archetype / table done in `spawn()` (and subsequent move to the actual archetype in `.insert(some_bundle)`). This improves spawn performance by over 10%: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/191627587-4ab2f949-4ccd-4231-80eb-80dd4d9ad6b9.png) To take this measurement, I added a new `world_spawn` benchmark. Unfortunately, optimizing `Commands::spawn` is slightly less trivial, as Commands expose the Entity id of spawned entities prior to actually spawning. Doing the optimization would (naively) require assurances that the `spawn(some_bundle)` command is applied before all other commands involving the entity (which would not necessarily be true, if memory serves). Optimizing `Commands::spawn` this way does feel possible, but it will require careful thought (and maybe some additional checks), which deserves its own PR. For now, it has the same performance characteristics of the current `Commands::spawn_bundle` on main. **Note that 99% of this PR is simple renames and refactors. The only code that needs careful scrutiny is the new `World::spawn()` impl, which is relatively straightforward, but it has some new unsafe code (which re-uses battle tested BundlerSpawner code path).** --- ## Changelog - All `spawn` apis (`World::spawn`, `Commands:;spawn`, `ChildBuilder::spawn`, and `WorldChildBuilder::spawn`) now accept a bundle as input - All instances of `spawn_bundle` have been deprecated in favor of the new `spawn` api - World and Commands now have `spawn_empty()`, which is equivalent to the old `spawn()` behavior. ## Migration Guide ```rust // Old (0.8): commands .spawn() .insert_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): commands.spawn_bundle((A, B, C)); // New (0.9) commands.spawn((A, B, C)); // Old (0.8): let entity = commands.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = commands.spawn_empty().id(); // Old (0.8) let entity = world.spawn().id(); // New (0.9) let entity = world.spawn_empty(); ```
2022-09-23 19:55:54 +00:00
/// commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle {
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// material: materials.add(CustomMaterial {
/// color: Color::RED,
/// color_texture: asset_server.load("some_image.png"),
/// }),
/// ..Default::default()
/// });
/// }
/// ```
/// In WGSL shaders, the material's binding would look like this:
///
/// ```wgsl
/// struct CustomMaterial {
2022-08-08 19:59:59 +00:00
/// color: vec4<f32>,
/// }
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
///
2022-08-08 19:59:59 +00:00
/// @group(1) @binding(0)
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// var<uniform> material: CustomMaterial;
2022-08-08 19:59:59 +00:00
/// @group(1) @binding(1)
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// var color_texture: texture_2d<f32>;
2022-08-08 19:59:59 +00:00
/// @group(1) @binding(2)
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// var color_sampler: sampler;
/// ```
reflect: stable type path v2 (#7184) # Objective - Introduce a stable alternative to [`std::any::type_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/any/fn.type_name.html). - Rewrite of #5805 with heavy inspiration in design. - On the path to #5830. - Part of solving #3327. ## Solution - Add a `TypePath` trait for static stable type path/name information. - Add a `TypePath` derive macro. - Add a `impl_type_path` macro for implementing internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. --- ## Changelog - Added `TypePath` trait. - Added `DynamicTypePath` trait and `get_type_path` method to `Reflect`. - Added a `TypePath` derive macro. - Added a `bevy_reflect::impl_type_path` for implementing `TypePath` on internal and foreign types in `bevy_reflect`. - Changed `bevy_reflect::utility::(Non)GenericTypeInfoCell` to `(Non)GenericTypedCell<T>` which allows us to be generic over both `TypeInfo` and `TypePath`. - `TypePath` is now a supertrait of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d`. - `impl_reflect_struct` needs a `#[type_path = "..."]` attribute to be specified. - `impl_reflect_value` needs to either specify path starting with a double colon (`::core::option::Option`) or an `in my_crate::foo` declaration. - Added `bevy_reflect_derive::ReflectTypePath`. - Most uses of `Ident` in `bevy_reflect_derive` changed to use `ReflectTypePath`. ## Migration Guide - Implementors of `Asset`, `Material` and `Material2d` now also need to derive `TypePath`. - Manual implementors of `Reflect` will need to implement the new `get_type_path` method. ## Open Questions - [x] ~This PR currently does not migrate any usages of `std::any::type_name` to use `bevy_reflect::TypePath` to ease the review process. Should it?~ Migration will be left to a follow-up PR. - [ ] This PR adds a lot of `#[derive(TypePath)]` and `T: TypePath` to satisfy new bounds, mostly when deriving `TypeUuid`. Should we make `TypePath` a supertrait of `TypeUuid`? [Should we remove `TypeUuid` in favour of `TypePath`?](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5805/files/2afbd855327c4b68e0a6b6f03118f289988441a4#r961067892)
2023-06-05 20:31:20 +00:00
pub trait Material2d: AsBindGroup + Send + Sync + Clone + TypeUuid + TypePath + Sized {
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// Returns this material's vertex shader. If [`ShaderRef::Default`] is returned, the default mesh vertex shader
/// will be used.
fn vertex_shader() -> ShaderRef {
ShaderRef::Default
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// Returns this material's fragment shader. If [`ShaderRef::Default`] is returned, the default mesh fragment shader
/// will be used.
fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef {
ShaderRef::Default
}
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
/// Customizes the default [`RenderPipelineDescriptor`].
#[allow(unused_variables)]
#[inline]
fn specialize(
descriptor: &mut RenderPipelineDescriptor,
layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
key: Material2dKey<Self>,
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
) -> Result<(), SpecializedMeshPipelineError> {
Ok(())
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// Adds the necessary ECS resources and render logic to enable rendering entities using the given [`Material2d`]
/// asset type (which includes [`Material2d`] types).
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub struct Material2dPlugin<M: Material2d>(PhantomData<M>);
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
impl<M: Material2d> Default for Material2dPlugin<M> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self(Default::default())
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
impl<M: Material2d> Plugin for Material2dPlugin<M>
where
M::Data: PartialEq + Eq + Hash + Clone,
{
fn build(&self, app: &mut App) {
app.add_asset::<M>()
.add_plugins(ExtractComponentPlugin::<Handle<M>>::extract_visible());
Migrate engine to Schedule v3 (#7267) Huge thanks to @maniwani, @devil-ira, @hymm, @cart, @superdump and @jakobhellermann for the help with this PR. # Objective - Followup #6587. - Minimal integration for the Stageless Scheduling RFC: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/45 ## Solution - [x] Remove old scheduling module - [x] Migrate new methods to no longer use extension methods - [x] Fix compiler errors - [x] Fix benchmarks - [x] Fix examples - [x] Fix docs - [x] Fix tests ## Changelog ### Added - a large number of methods on `App` to work with schedules ergonomically - the `CoreSchedule` enum - `App::add_extract_system` via the `RenderingAppExtension` trait extension method - the private `prepare_view_uniforms` system now has a public system set for scheduling purposes, called `ViewSet::PrepareUniforms` ### Removed - stages, and all code that mentions stages - states have been dramatically simplified, and no longer use a stack - `RunCriteriaLabel` - `AsSystemLabel` trait - `on_hierarchy_reports_enabled` run criteria (now just uses an ad hoc resource checking run condition) - systems in `RenderSet/Stage::Extract` no longer warn when they do not read data from the main world - `RunCriteriaLabel` - `transform_propagate_system_set`: this was a nonstandard pattern that didn't actually provide enough control. The systems are already `pub`: the docs have been updated to ensure that the third-party usage is clear. ### Changed - `System::default_labels` is now `System::default_system_sets`. - `App::add_default_labels` is now `App::add_default_sets` - `CoreStage` and `StartupStage` enums are now `CoreSet` and `StartupSet` - `App::add_system_set` was renamed to `App::add_systems` - The `StartupSchedule` label is now defined as part of the `CoreSchedules` enum - `.label(SystemLabel)` is now referred to as `.in_set(SystemSet)` - `SystemLabel` trait was replaced by `SystemSet` - `SystemTypeIdLabel<T>` was replaced by `SystemSetType<T>` - The `ReportHierarchyIssue` resource now has a public constructor (`new`), and implements `PartialEq` - Fixed time steps now use a schedule (`CoreSchedule::FixedTimeStep`) rather than a run criteria. - Adding rendering extraction systems now panics rather than silently failing if no subapp with the `RenderApp` label is found. - the `calculate_bounds` system, with the `CalculateBounds` label, is now in `CoreSet::Update`, rather than in `CoreSet::PostUpdate` before commands are applied. - `SceneSpawnerSystem` now runs under `CoreSet::Update`, rather than `CoreStage::PreUpdate.at_end()`. - `bevy_pbr::add_clusters` is no longer an exclusive system - the top level `bevy_ecs::schedule` module was replaced with `bevy_ecs::scheduling` - `tick_global_task_pools_on_main_thread` is no longer run as an exclusive system. Instead, it has been replaced by `tick_global_task_pools`, which uses a `NonSend` resource to force running on the main thread. ## Migration Guide - Calls to `.label(MyLabel)` should be replaced with `.in_set(MySet)` - Stages have been removed. Replace these with system sets, and then add command flushes using the `apply_system_buffers` exclusive system where needed. - The `CoreStage`, `StartupStage, `RenderStage` and `AssetStage` enums have been replaced with `CoreSet`, `StartupSet, `RenderSet` and `AssetSet`. The same scheduling guarantees have been preserved. - Systems are no longer added to `CoreSet::Update` by default. Add systems manually if this behavior is needed, although you should consider adding your game logic systems to `CoreSchedule::FixedTimestep` instead for more reliable framerate-independent behavior. - Similarly, startup systems are no longer part of `StartupSet::Startup` by default. In most cases, this won't matter to you. - For example, `add_system_to_stage(CoreStage::PostUpdate, my_system)` should be replaced with - `add_system(my_system.in_set(CoreSet::PostUpdate)` - When testing systems or otherwise running them in a headless fashion, simply construct and run a schedule using `Schedule::new()` and `World::run_schedule` rather than constructing stages - Run criteria have been renamed to run conditions. These can now be combined with each other and with states. - Looping run criteria and state stacks have been removed. Use an exclusive system that runs a schedule if you need this level of control over system control flow. - For app-level control flow over which schedules get run when (such as for rollback networking), create your own schedule and insert it under the `CoreSchedule::Outer` label. - Fixed timesteps are now evaluated in a schedule, rather than controlled via run criteria. The `run_fixed_timestep` system runs this schedule between `CoreSet::First` and `CoreSet::PreUpdate` by default. - Command flush points introduced by `AssetStage` have been removed. If you were relying on these, add them back manually. - Adding extract systems is now typically done directly on the main app. Make sure the `RenderingAppExtension` trait is in scope, then call `app.add_extract_system(my_system)`. - the `calculate_bounds` system, with the `CalculateBounds` label, is now in `CoreSet::Update`, rather than in `CoreSet::PostUpdate` before commands are applied. You may need to order your movement systems to occur before this system in order to avoid system order ambiguities in culling behavior. - the `RenderLabel` `AppLabel` was renamed to `RenderApp` for clarity - `App::add_state` now takes 0 arguments: the starting state is set based on the `Default` impl. - Instead of creating `SystemSet` containers for systems that run in stages, simply use `.on_enter::<State::Variant>()` or its `on_exit` or `on_update` siblings. - `SystemLabel` derives should be replaced with `SystemSet`. You will also need to add the `Debug`, `PartialEq`, `Eq`, and `Hash` traits to satisfy the new trait bounds. - `with_run_criteria` has been renamed to `run_if`. Run criteria have been renamed to run conditions for clarity, and should now simply return a bool. - States have been dramatically simplified: there is no longer a "state stack". To queue a transition to the next state, call `NextState::set` ## TODO - [x] remove dead methods on App and World - [x] add `App::add_system_to_schedule` and `App::add_systems_to_schedule` - [x] avoid adding the default system set at inappropriate times - [x] remove any accidental cycles in the default plugins schedule - [x] migrate benchmarks - [x] expose explicit labels for the built-in command flush points - [x] migrate engine code - [x] remove all mentions of stages from the docs - [x] verify docs for States - [x] fix uses of exclusive systems that use .end / .at_start / .before_commands - [x] migrate RenderStage and AssetStage - [x] migrate examples - [x] ensure that transform propagation is exported in a sufficiently public way (the systems are already pub) - [x] ensure that on_enter schedules are run at least once before the main app - [x] re-enable opt-in to execution order ambiguities - [x] revert change to `update_bounds` to ensure it runs in `PostUpdate` - [x] test all examples - [x] unbreak directional lights - [x] unbreak shadows (see 3d_scene, 3d_shape, lighting, transparaency_3d examples) - [x] game menu example shows loading screen and menu simultaneously - [x] display settings menu is a blank screen - [x] `without_winit` example panics - [x] ensure all tests pass - [x] SubApp doc test fails - [x] runs_spawn_local tasks fails - [x] [Fix panic_when_hierachy_cycle test hanging](https://github.com/alice-i-cecile/bevy/pull/120) ## Points of Difficulty and Controversy **Reviewers, please give feedback on these and look closely** 1. Default sets, from the RFC, have been removed. These added a tremendous amount of implicit complexity and result in hard to debug scheduling errors. They're going to be tackled in the form of "base sets" by @cart in a followup. 2. The outer schedule controls which schedule is run when `App::update` is called. 3. I implemented `Label for `Box<dyn Label>` for our label types. This enables us to store schedule labels in concrete form, and then later run them. I ran into the same set of problems when working with one-shot systems. We've previously investigated this pattern in depth, and it does not appear to lead to extra indirection with nested boxes. 4. `SubApp::update` simply runs the default schedule once. This sucks, but this whole API is incomplete and this was the minimal changeset. 5. `time_system` and `tick_global_task_pools_on_main_thread` no longer use exclusive systems to attempt to force scheduling order 6. Implemetnation strategy for fixed timesteps 7. `AssetStage` was migrated to `AssetSet` without reintroducing command flush points. These did not appear to be used, and it's nice to remove these bottlenecks. 8. Migration of `bevy_render/lib.rs` and pipelined rendering. The logic here is unusually tricky, as we have complex scheduling requirements. ## Future Work (ideally before 0.10) - Rename schedule_v3 module to schedule or scheduling - Add a derive macro to states, and likely a `EnumIter` trait of some form - Figure out what exactly to do with the "systems added should basically work by default" problem - Improve ergonomics for working with fixed timesteps and states - Polish FixedTime API to match Time - Rebase and merge #7415 - Resolve all internal ambiguities (blocked on better tools, especially #7442) - Add "base sets" to replace the removed default sets.
2023-02-06 02:04:50 +00:00
if let Ok(render_app) = app.get_sub_app_mut(RenderApp) {
render_app
.add_render_command::<Transparent2d, DrawMaterial2d<M>>()
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
.init_resource::<ExtractedMaterials2d<M>>()
.init_resource::<RenderMaterials2d<M>>()
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
.init_resource::<SpecializedMeshPipelines<Material2dPipeline<M>>>()
.add_systems(ExtractSchedule, extract_materials_2d::<M>)
.add_systems(
Render,
(
prepare_materials_2d::<M>
Reorder render sets, refactor bevy_sprite to take advantage (#9236) This is a continuation of this PR: #8062 # Objective - Reorder render schedule sets to allow data preparation when phase item order is known to support improved batching - Part of the batching/instancing etc plan from here: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/89#issuecomment-1379249074 - The original idea came from @inodentry and proved to be a good one. Thanks! - Refactor `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` to take advantage of the new ordering ## Solution - Move `Prepare` and `PrepareFlush` after `PhaseSortFlush` - Add a `PrepareAssets` set that runs in parallel with other systems and sets in the render schedule. - Put prepare_assets systems in the `PrepareAssets` set - If explicit dependencies are needed on Mesh or Material RenderAssets then depend on the appropriate system. - Add `ManageViews` and `ManageViewsFlush` sets between `ExtractCommands` and Queue - Move `queue_mesh*_bind_group` to the Prepare stage - Rename them to `prepare_` - Put systems that prepare resources (buffers, textures, etc.) into a `PrepareResources` set inside `Prepare` - Put the `prepare_..._bind_group` systems into a `PrepareBindGroup` set after `PrepareResources` - Move `prepare_lights` to the `ManageViews` set - `prepare_lights` creates views and this must happen before `Queue` - This system needs refactoring to stop handling all responsibilities - Gather lights, sort, and create shadow map views. Store sorted light entities in a resource - Remove `BatchedPhaseItem` - Replace `batch_range` with `batch_size` representing how many items to skip after rendering the item or to skip the item entirely if `batch_size` is 0. - `queue_sprites` has been split into `queue_sprites` for queueing phase items and `prepare_sprites` for batching after the `PhaseSort` - `PhaseItem`s are still inserted in `queue_sprites` - After sorting adjacent compatible sprite phase items are accumulated into `SpriteBatch` components on the first entity of each batch, containing a range of vertex indices. The associated `PhaseItem`'s `batch_size` is updated appropriately. - `SpriteBatch` items are then drawn skipping over the other items in the batch based on the value in `batch_size` - A very similar refactor was performed on `bevy_ui` --- ## Changelog Changed: - Reordered and reworked render app schedule sets. The main change is that data is extracted, queued, sorted, and then prepared when the order of data is known. - Refactor `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` to take advantage of the reordering. ## Migration Guide - Assets such as materials and meshes should now be created in `PrepareAssets` e.g. `prepare_assets<Mesh>` - Queueing entities to `RenderPhase`s continues to be done in `Queue` e.g. `queue_sprites` - Preparing resources (textures, buffers, etc.) should now be done in `PrepareResources`, e.g. `prepare_prepass_textures`, `prepare_mesh_uniforms` - Prepare bind groups should now be done in `PrepareBindGroups` e.g. `prepare_mesh_bind_group` - Any batching or instancing can now be done in `Prepare` where the order of the phase items is known e.g. `prepare_sprites` ## Next Steps - Introduce some generic mechanism to ensure items that can be batched are grouped in the phase item order, currently you could easily have `[sprite at z 0, mesh at z 0, sprite at z 0]` preventing batching. - Investigate improved orderings for building the MeshUniform buffer - Implementing batching across the rest of bevy --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: robtfm <50659922+robtfm@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-08-27 14:33:49 +00:00
.in_set(RenderSet::PrepareAssets)
.after(prepare_assets::<Image>),
queue_material2d_meshes::<M>
.in_set(RenderSet::QueueMeshes)
.after(prepare_materials_2d::<M>),
),
);
}
}
Webgpu support (#8336) # Objective - Support WebGPU - alternative to #5027 that doesn't need any async / await - fixes #8315 - Surprise fix #7318 ## Solution ### For async renderer initialisation - Update the plugin lifecycle: - app builds the plugin - calls `plugin.build` - registers the plugin - app starts the event loop - event loop waits for `ready` of all registered plugins in the same order - returns `true` by default - then call all `finish` then all `cleanup` in the same order as registered - then execute the schedule In the case of the renderer, to avoid anything async: - building the renderer plugin creates a detached task that will send back the initialised renderer through a mutex in a resource - `ready` will wait for the renderer to be present in the resource - `finish` will take that renderer and place it in the expected resources by other plugins - other plugins (that expect the renderer to be available) `finish` are called and they are able to set up their pipelines - `cleanup` is called, only custom one is still for pipeline rendering ### For WebGPU support - update the `build-wasm-example` script to support passing `--api webgpu` that will build the example with WebGPU support - feature for webgl2 was always enabled when building for wasm. it's now in the default feature list and enabled on all platforms, so check for this feature must also check that the target_arch is `wasm32` --- ## Migration Guide - `Plugin::setup` has been renamed `Plugin::cleanup` - `Plugin::finish` has been added, and plugins adding pipelines should do it in this function instead of `Plugin::build` ```rust // Before impl Plugin for MyPlugin { fn build(&self, app: &mut App) { app.insert_resource::<MyResource> .add_systems(Update, my_system); let render_app = match app.get_sub_app_mut(RenderApp) { Ok(render_app) => render_app, Err(_) => return, }; render_app .init_resource::<RenderResourceNeedingDevice>() .init_resource::<OtherRenderResource>(); } } // After impl Plugin for MyPlugin { fn build(&self, app: &mut App) { app.insert_resource::<MyResource> .add_systems(Update, my_system); let render_app = match app.get_sub_app_mut(RenderApp) { Ok(render_app) => render_app, Err(_) => return, }; render_app .init_resource::<OtherRenderResource>(); } fn finish(&self, app: &mut App) { let render_app = match app.get_sub_app_mut(RenderApp) { Ok(render_app) => render_app, Err(_) => return, }; render_app .init_resource::<RenderResourceNeedingDevice>(); } } ```
2023-05-04 22:07:57 +00:00
fn finish(&self, app: &mut App) {
if let Ok(render_app) = app.get_sub_app_mut(RenderApp) {
render_app.init_resource::<Material2dPipeline<M>>();
}
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// Render pipeline data for a given [`Material2d`]
Make `Resource` trait opt-in, requiring `#[derive(Resource)]` V2 (#5577) *This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.* # Objective Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds. While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks: * it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource * it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource * we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component). * dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways * raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values * we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor ## Notes to reviewers * Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits. *ira: My commits are not as well organized :')* * I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does. * I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981. ## Changelog `Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro. ## Migration Guide Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource. If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics. `ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing. Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead. Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-08-08 21:36:35 +00:00
#[derive(Resource)]
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub struct Material2dPipeline<M: Material2d> {
pub mesh2d_pipeline: Mesh2dPipeline,
pub material2d_layout: BindGroupLayout,
pub vertex_shader: Option<Handle<Shader>>,
pub fragment_shader: Option<Handle<Shader>>,
marker: PhantomData<M>,
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub struct Material2dKey<M: Material2d> {
pub mesh_key: Mesh2dPipelineKey,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub bind_group_data: M::Data,
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
impl<M: Material2d> Eq for Material2dKey<M> where M::Data: PartialEq {}
impl<M: Material2d> PartialEq for Material2dKey<M>
where
M::Data: PartialEq,
{
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
self.mesh_key == other.mesh_key && self.bind_group_data == other.bind_group_data
}
}
impl<M: Material2d> Clone for Material2dKey<M>
where
M::Data: Clone,
{
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
Self {
mesh_key: self.mesh_key,
bind_group_data: self.bind_group_data.clone(),
}
}
}
impl<M: Material2d> Hash for Material2dKey<M>
where
M::Data: Hash,
{
fn hash<H: std::hash::Hasher>(&self, state: &mut H) {
self.mesh_key.hash(state);
self.bind_group_data.hash(state);
}
}
impl<M: Material2d> Clone for Material2dPipeline<M> {
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
Self {
mesh2d_pipeline: self.mesh2d_pipeline.clone(),
material2d_layout: self.material2d_layout.clone(),
vertex_shader: self.vertex_shader.clone(),
fragment_shader: self.fragment_shader.clone(),
marker: PhantomData,
}
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
impl<M: Material2d> SpecializedMeshPipeline for Material2dPipeline<M>
where
M::Data: PartialEq + Eq + Hash + Clone,
{
type Key = Material2dKey<M>;
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
fn specialize(
&self,
key: Self::Key,
layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout,
) -> Result<RenderPipelineDescriptor, SpecializedMeshPipelineError> {
let mut descriptor = self.mesh2d_pipeline.specialize(key.mesh_key, layout)?;
if let Some(vertex_shader) = &self.vertex_shader {
descriptor.vertex.shader = vertex_shader.clone();
}
if let Some(fragment_shader) = &self.fragment_shader {
descriptor.fragment.as_mut().unwrap().shader = fragment_shader.clone();
}
Add push contant config to layout (#7681) # Objective Allow for creating pipelines that use push constants. To be able to use push constants. Fixes #4825 As of right now, trying to call `RenderPass::set_push_constants` will trigger the following error: ``` thread 'main' panicked at 'wgpu error: Validation Error Caused by: In a RenderPass note: encoder = `<CommandBuffer-(0, 59, Vulkan)>` In a set_push_constant command provided push constant is for stage(s) VERTEX | FRAGMENT | VERTEX_FRAGMENT, however the pipeline layout has no push constant range for the stage(s) VERTEX | FRAGMENT | VERTEX_FRAGMENT ``` ## Solution Add a field push_constant_ranges to` RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor`. This PR supersedes #4908 which now contains merge conflicts due to significant changes to `bevy_render`. Meanwhile, this PR also made the `layout` field of `RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor` non-optional. If the user do not need to specify the bind group layouts, they can simply supply an empty vector here. No need for it to be optional. --- ## Changelog - Add a field push_constant_ranges to RenderPipelineDescriptor and ComputePipelineDescriptor - Made the `layout` field of RenderPipelineDescriptor and ComputePipelineDescriptor non-optional. ## Migration Guide - Add push_constant_ranges: Vec::new() to every `RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor` - Unwrap the optional values on the `layout` field of `RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor`. If the descriptor has no layout, supply an empty vector. Co-authored-by: Zhixing Zhang <me@neoto.xin>
2023-02-17 06:20:16 +00:00
descriptor.layout = vec![
self.mesh2d_pipeline.view_layout.clone(),
self.material2d_layout.clone(),
self.mesh2d_pipeline.mesh_layout.clone(),
Add push contant config to layout (#7681) # Objective Allow for creating pipelines that use push constants. To be able to use push constants. Fixes #4825 As of right now, trying to call `RenderPass::set_push_constants` will trigger the following error: ``` thread 'main' panicked at 'wgpu error: Validation Error Caused by: In a RenderPass note: encoder = `<CommandBuffer-(0, 59, Vulkan)>` In a set_push_constant command provided push constant is for stage(s) VERTEX | FRAGMENT | VERTEX_FRAGMENT, however the pipeline layout has no push constant range for the stage(s) VERTEX | FRAGMENT | VERTEX_FRAGMENT ``` ## Solution Add a field push_constant_ranges to` RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor`. This PR supersedes #4908 which now contains merge conflicts due to significant changes to `bevy_render`. Meanwhile, this PR also made the `layout` field of `RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor` non-optional. If the user do not need to specify the bind group layouts, they can simply supply an empty vector here. No need for it to be optional. --- ## Changelog - Add a field push_constant_ranges to RenderPipelineDescriptor and ComputePipelineDescriptor - Made the `layout` field of RenderPipelineDescriptor and ComputePipelineDescriptor non-optional. ## Migration Guide - Add push_constant_ranges: Vec::new() to every `RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor` - Unwrap the optional values on the `layout` field of `RenderPipelineDescriptor` and `ComputePipelineDescriptor`. If the descriptor has no layout, supply an empty vector. Co-authored-by: Zhixing Zhang <me@neoto.xin>
2023-02-17 06:20:16 +00:00
];
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
M::specialize(&mut descriptor, layout, key)?;
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
Ok(descriptor)
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
impl<M: Material2d> FromWorld for Material2dPipeline<M> {
fn from_world(world: &mut World) -> Self {
let asset_server = world.resource::<AssetServer>();
let render_device = world.resource::<RenderDevice>();
let material2d_layout = M::bind_group_layout(render_device);
Material2dPipeline {
mesh2d_pipeline: world.resource::<Mesh2dPipeline>().clone(),
material2d_layout,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
vertex_shader: match M::vertex_shader() {
ShaderRef::Default => None,
ShaderRef::Handle(handle) => Some(handle),
ShaderRef::Path(path) => Some(asset_server.load(path)),
},
fragment_shader: match M::fragment_shader() {
ShaderRef::Default => None,
ShaderRef::Handle(handle) => Some(handle),
ShaderRef::Path(path) => Some(asset_server.load(path)),
},
marker: PhantomData,
}
}
}
type DrawMaterial2d<M> = (
SetItemPipeline,
SetMesh2dViewBindGroup<0>,
SetMaterial2dBindGroup<M, 1>,
SetMesh2dBindGroup<2>,
DrawMesh2d,
);
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub struct SetMaterial2dBindGroup<M: Material2d, const I: usize>(PhantomData<M>);
impl<P: PhaseItem, M: Material2d, const I: usize> RenderCommand<P>
for SetMaterial2dBindGroup<M, I>
{
type Param = SRes<RenderMaterials2d<M>>;
type ViewWorldQuery = ();
type ItemWorldQuery = Read<Handle<M>>;
#[inline]
fn render<'w>(
_item: &P,
_view: (),
material2d_handle: ROQueryItem<'_, Self::ItemWorldQuery>,
materials: SystemParamItem<'w, '_, Self::Param>,
pass: &mut TrackedRenderPass<'w>,
) -> RenderCommandResult {
let material2d = materials.into_inner().get(material2d_handle).unwrap();
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pass.set_bind_group(I, &material2d.bind_group, &[]);
RenderCommandResult::Success
}
}
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub fn queue_material2d_meshes<M: Material2d>(
transparent_draw_functions: Res<DrawFunctions<Transparent2d>>,
material2d_pipeline: Res<Material2dPipeline<M>>,
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
mut pipelines: ResMut<SpecializedMeshPipelines<Material2dPipeline<M>>>,
pipeline_cache: Res<PipelineCache>,
msaa: Res<Msaa>,
render_meshes: Res<RenderAssets<Mesh>>,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
render_materials: Res<RenderMaterials2d<M>>,
material2d_meshes: Query<(&Handle<M>, &Mesh2dHandle, &Mesh2dUniform)>,
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
mut views: Query<(
&ExtractedView,
&VisibleEntities,
Option<&Tonemapping>,
Option<&DebandDither>,
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
&mut RenderPhase<Transparent2d>,
)>,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
) where
M::Data: PartialEq + Eq + Hash + Clone,
{
if material2d_meshes.is_empty() {
return;
}
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
for (view, visible_entities, tonemapping, dither, mut transparent_phase) in &mut views {
let draw_transparent_pbr = transparent_draw_functions.read().id::<DrawMaterial2d<M>>();
let mut view_key = Mesh2dPipelineKey::from_msaa_samples(msaa.samples())
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
| Mesh2dPipelineKey::from_hdr(view.hdr);
if !view.hdr {
if let Some(tonemapping) = tonemapping {
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
view_key |= Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_IN_SHADER;
view_key |= match tonemapping {
Tonemapping::None => Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_NONE,
Tonemapping::Reinhard => Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_REINHARD,
Tonemapping::ReinhardLuminance => {
Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_REINHARD_LUMINANCE
}
Tonemapping::AcesFitted => Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_ACES_FITTED,
Tonemapping::AgX => Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_AGX,
Tonemapping::SomewhatBoringDisplayTransform => {
Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_SOMEWHAT_BORING_DISPLAY_TRANSFORM
}
Tonemapping::TonyMcMapface => Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_TONY_MC_MAPFACE,
Tonemapping::BlenderFilmic => Mesh2dPipelineKey::TONEMAP_METHOD_BLENDER_FILMIC,
};
}
if let Some(DebandDither::Enabled) = dither {
view_key |= Mesh2dPipelineKey::DEBAND_DITHER;
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
}
}
for visible_entity in &visible_entities.entities {
if let Ok((material2d_handle, mesh2d_handle, mesh2d_uniform)) =
material2d_meshes.get(*visible_entity)
{
if let Some(material2d) = render_materials.get(material2d_handle) {
if let Some(mesh) = render_meshes.get(&mesh2d_handle.0) {
separate tonemapping and upscaling passes (#3425) Attempt to make features like bloom https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2876 easier to implement. **This PR:** - Moves the tonemapping from `pbr.wgsl` into a separate pass - also add a separate upscaling pass after the tonemapping which writes to the swap chain (enables resolution-independant rendering and post-processing after tonemapping) - adds a `hdr` bool to the camera which controls whether the pbr and sprite shaders render into a `Rgba16Float` texture **Open questions:** - ~should the 2d graph work the same as the 3d one?~ it is the same now - ~The current solution is a bit inflexible because while you can add a post processing pass that writes to e.g. the `hdr_texture`, you can't write to a separate `user_postprocess_texture` while reading the `hdr_texture` and tell the tone mapping pass to read from the `user_postprocess_texture` instead. If the tonemapping and upscaling render graph nodes were to take in a `TextureView` instead of the view entity this would almost work, but the bind groups for their respective input textures are already created in the `Queue` render stage in the hardcoded order.~ solved by creating bind groups in render node **New render graph:** ![render_graph](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147767249-57dd4229-cfab-4ec5-9bf3-dc76dccf8e8b.png) <details> <summary>Before</summary> ![render_graph_old](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22177966/147284579-c895fdbd-4028-41cf-914c-e1ffef60e44e.png) </details> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-10-26 20:13:59 +00:00
let mesh_key = view_key
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
| Mesh2dPipelineKey::from_primitive_topology(mesh.primitive_topology);
let pipeline_id = pipelines.specialize(
&pipeline_cache,
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
&material2d_pipeline,
Material2dKey {
mesh_key,
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
bind_group_data: material2d.key.clone(),
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
},
&mesh.layout,
);
let pipeline_id = match pipeline_id {
Ok(id) => id,
Err(err) => {
error!("{}", err);
continue;
}
};
let mesh_z = mesh2d_uniform.transform.w_axis.z;
transparent_phase.add(Transparent2d {
entity: *visible_entity,
draw_function: draw_transparent_pbr,
pipeline: pipeline_id,
// NOTE: Back-to-front ordering for transparent with ascending sort means far should have the
// lowest sort key and getting closer should increase. As we have
// -z in front of the camera, the largest distance is -far with values increasing toward the
// camera. As such we can just use mesh_z as the distance
sort_key: FloatOrd(mesh_z),
// This material is not batched
Reorder render sets, refactor bevy_sprite to take advantage (#9236) This is a continuation of this PR: #8062 # Objective - Reorder render schedule sets to allow data preparation when phase item order is known to support improved batching - Part of the batching/instancing etc plan from here: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/89#issuecomment-1379249074 - The original idea came from @inodentry and proved to be a good one. Thanks! - Refactor `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` to take advantage of the new ordering ## Solution - Move `Prepare` and `PrepareFlush` after `PhaseSortFlush` - Add a `PrepareAssets` set that runs in parallel with other systems and sets in the render schedule. - Put prepare_assets systems in the `PrepareAssets` set - If explicit dependencies are needed on Mesh or Material RenderAssets then depend on the appropriate system. - Add `ManageViews` and `ManageViewsFlush` sets between `ExtractCommands` and Queue - Move `queue_mesh*_bind_group` to the Prepare stage - Rename them to `prepare_` - Put systems that prepare resources (buffers, textures, etc.) into a `PrepareResources` set inside `Prepare` - Put the `prepare_..._bind_group` systems into a `PrepareBindGroup` set after `PrepareResources` - Move `prepare_lights` to the `ManageViews` set - `prepare_lights` creates views and this must happen before `Queue` - This system needs refactoring to stop handling all responsibilities - Gather lights, sort, and create shadow map views. Store sorted light entities in a resource - Remove `BatchedPhaseItem` - Replace `batch_range` with `batch_size` representing how many items to skip after rendering the item or to skip the item entirely if `batch_size` is 0. - `queue_sprites` has been split into `queue_sprites` for queueing phase items and `prepare_sprites` for batching after the `PhaseSort` - `PhaseItem`s are still inserted in `queue_sprites` - After sorting adjacent compatible sprite phase items are accumulated into `SpriteBatch` components on the first entity of each batch, containing a range of vertex indices. The associated `PhaseItem`'s `batch_size` is updated appropriately. - `SpriteBatch` items are then drawn skipping over the other items in the batch based on the value in `batch_size` - A very similar refactor was performed on `bevy_ui` --- ## Changelog Changed: - Reordered and reworked render app schedule sets. The main change is that data is extracted, queued, sorted, and then prepared when the order of data is known. - Refactor `bevy_sprite` and `bevy_ui` to take advantage of the reordering. ## Migration Guide - Assets such as materials and meshes should now be created in `PrepareAssets` e.g. `prepare_assets<Mesh>` - Queueing entities to `RenderPhase`s continues to be done in `Queue` e.g. `queue_sprites` - Preparing resources (textures, buffers, etc.) should now be done in `PrepareResources`, e.g. `prepare_prepass_textures`, `prepare_mesh_uniforms` - Prepare bind groups should now be done in `PrepareBindGroups` e.g. `prepare_mesh_bind_group` - Any batching or instancing can now be done in `Prepare` where the order of the phase items is known e.g. `prepare_sprites` ## Next Steps - Introduce some generic mechanism to ensure items that can be batched are grouped in the phase item order, currently you could easily have `[sprite at z 0, mesh at z 0, sprite at z 0]` preventing batching. - Investigate improved orderings for building the MeshUniform buffer - Implementing batching across the rest of bevy --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: robtfm <50659922+robtfm@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-08-27 14:33:49 +00:00
batch_size: 1,
Mesh vertex buffer layouts (#3959) This PR makes a number of changes to how meshes and vertex attributes are handled, which the goal of enabling easy and flexible custom vertex attributes: * Reworks the `Mesh` type to use the newly added `VertexAttribute` internally * `VertexAttribute` defines the name, a unique `VertexAttributeId`, and a `VertexFormat` * `VertexAttributeId` is used to produce consistent sort orders for vertex buffer generation, replacing the more expensive and often surprising "name based sorting" * Meshes can be used to generate a `MeshVertexBufferLayout`, which defines the layout of the gpu buffer produced by the mesh. `MeshVertexBufferLayouts` can then be used to generate actual `VertexBufferLayouts` according to the requirements of a specific pipeline. This decoupling of "mesh layout" vs "pipeline vertex buffer layout" is what enables custom attributes. We don't need to standardize _mesh layouts_ or contort meshes to meet the needs of a specific pipeline. As long as the mesh has what the pipeline needs, it will work transparently. * Mesh-based pipelines now specialize on `&MeshVertexBufferLayout` via the new `SpecializedMeshPipeline` trait (which behaves like `SpecializedPipeline`, but adds `&MeshVertexBufferLayout`). The integrity of the pipeline cache is maintained because the `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is treated as part of the key (which is fully abstracted from implementers of the trait ... no need to add any additional info to the specialization key). * Hashing `MeshVertexBufferLayout` is too expensive to do for every entity, every frame. To make this scalable, I added a generalized "pre-hashing" solution to `bevy_utils`: `Hashed<T>` keys and `PreHashMap<K, V>` (which uses `Hashed<T>` internally) . Why didn't I just do the quick and dirty in-place "pre-compute hash and use that u64 as a key in a hashmap" that we've done in the past? Because its wrong! Hashes by themselves aren't enough because two different values can produce the same hash. Re-hashing a hash is even worse! I decided to build a generalized solution because this pattern has come up in the past and we've chosen to do the wrong thing. Now we can do the right thing! This did unfortunately require pulling in `hashbrown` and using that in `bevy_utils`, because avoiding re-hashes requires the `raw_entry_mut` api, which isn't stabilized yet (and may never be ... `entry_ref` has favor now, but also isn't available yet). If std's HashMap ever provides the tools we need, we can move back to that. Note that adding `hashbrown` doesn't increase our dependency count because it was already in our tree. I will probably break these changes out into their own PR. * Specializing on `MeshVertexBufferLayout` has one non-obvious behavior: it can produce identical pipelines for two different MeshVertexBufferLayouts. To optimize the number of active pipelines / reduce re-binds while drawing, I de-duplicate pipelines post-specialization using the final `VertexBufferLayout` as the key. For example, consider a pipeline that needs the layout `(position, normal)` and is specialized using two meshes: `(position, normal, uv)` and `(position, normal, other_vec2)`. If both of these meshes result in `(position, normal)` specializations, we can use the same pipeline! Now we do. Cool! To briefly illustrate, this is what the relevant section of `MeshPipeline`'s specialization code looks like now: ```rust impl SpecializedMeshPipeline for MeshPipeline { type Key = MeshPipelineKey; fn specialize( &self, key: Self::Key, layout: &MeshVertexBufferLayout, ) -> RenderPipelineDescriptor { let mut vertex_attributes = vec![ Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_POSITION.at_shader_location(0), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL.at_shader_location(1), Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_UV_0.at_shader_location(2), ]; let mut shader_defs = Vec::new(); if layout.contains(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT) { shader_defs.push(String::from("VERTEX_TANGENTS")); vertex_attributes.push(Mesh::ATTRIBUTE_TANGENT.at_shader_location(3)); } let vertex_buffer_layout = layout .get_layout(&vertex_attributes) .expect("Mesh is missing a vertex attribute"); ``` Notice that this is _much_ simpler than it was before. And now any mesh with any layout can be used with this pipeline, provided it has vertex postions, normals, and uvs. We even got to remove `HAS_TANGENTS` from MeshPipelineKey and `has_tangents` from `GpuMesh`, because that information is redundant with `MeshVertexBufferLayout`. This is still a draft because I still need to: * Add more docs * Experiment with adding error handling to mesh pipeline specialization (which would print errors at runtime when a mesh is missing a vertex attribute required by a pipeline). If it doesn't tank perf, we'll keep it. * Consider breaking out the PreHash / hashbrown changes into a separate PR. * Add an example illustrating this change * Verify that the "mesh-specialized pipeline de-duplication code" works properly Please dont yell at me for not doing these things yet :) Just trying to get this in peoples' hands asap. Alternative to #3120 Fixes #3030 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 23:21:13 +00:00
});
}
}
}
}
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// Data prepared for a [`Material2d`] instance.
pub struct PreparedMaterial2d<T: Material2d> {
pub bindings: Vec<OwnedBindingResource>,
pub bind_group: BindGroup,
pub key: T::Data,
}
Make `Resource` trait opt-in, requiring `#[derive(Resource)]` V2 (#5577) *This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.* # Objective Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds. While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks: * it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource * it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource * we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component). * dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways * raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values * we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor ## Notes to reviewers * Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits. *ira: My commits are not as well organized :')* * I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does. * I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981. ## Changelog `Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro. ## Migration Guide Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource. If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics. `ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing. Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead. Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-08-08 21:36:35 +00:00
#[derive(Resource)]
pub struct ExtractedMaterials2d<M: Material2d> {
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
extracted: Vec<(Handle<M>, M)>,
removed: Vec<Handle<M>>,
}
impl<M: Material2d> Default for ExtractedMaterials2d<M> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
extracted: Default::default(),
removed: Default::default(),
}
}
}
/// Stores all prepared representations of [`Material2d`] assets for as long as they exist.
Make `Resource` trait opt-in, requiring `#[derive(Resource)]` V2 (#5577) *This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.* # Objective Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds. While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks: * it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource * it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource * we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component). * dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways * raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values * we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor ## Notes to reviewers * Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits. *ira: My commits are not as well organized :')* * I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does. * I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981. ## Changelog `Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro. ## Migration Guide Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource. If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics. `ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing. Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead. Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-08-08 21:36:35 +00:00
#[derive(Resource, Deref, DerefMut)]
pub struct RenderMaterials2d<T: Material2d>(HashMap<Handle<T>, PreparedMaterial2d<T>>);
impl<T: Material2d> Default for RenderMaterials2d<T> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self(Default::default())
}
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
/// This system extracts all created or modified assets of the corresponding [`Material2d`] type
/// into the "render world".
pub fn extract_materials_2d<M: Material2d>(
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
mut commands: Commands,
mut events: Extract<EventReader<AssetEvent<M>>>,
assets: Extract<Res<Assets<M>>>,
) {
let mut changed_assets = HashSet::default();
let mut removed = Vec::new();
for event in events.read() {
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
match event {
AssetEvent::Created { handle } | AssetEvent::Modified { handle } => {
changed_assets.insert(handle.clone_weak());
}
AssetEvent::Removed { handle } => {
changed_assets.remove(handle);
removed.push(handle.clone_weak());
}
}
}
let mut extracted_assets = Vec::new();
for handle in changed_assets.drain() {
if let Some(asset) = assets.get(&handle) {
extracted_assets.push((handle, asset.clone()));
}
}
commands.insert_resource(ExtractedMaterials2d {
extracted: extracted_assets,
removed,
});
}
/// All [`Material2d`] values of a given type that should be prepared next frame.
pub struct PrepareNextFrameMaterials<M: Material2d> {
assets: Vec<(Handle<M>, M)>,
}
impl<M: Material2d> Default for PrepareNextFrameMaterials<M> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
assets: Default::default(),
}
}
}
/// This system prepares all assets of the corresponding [`Material2d`] type
/// which where extracted this frame for the GPU.
pub fn prepare_materials_2d<M: Material2d>(
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
mut prepare_next_frame: Local<PrepareNextFrameMaterials<M>>,
mut extracted_assets: ResMut<ExtractedMaterials2d<M>>,
mut render_materials: ResMut<RenderMaterials2d<M>>,
render_device: Res<RenderDevice>,
images: Res<RenderAssets<Image>>,
fallback_image: Res<FallbackImage>,
pipeline: Res<Material2dPipeline<M>>,
) {
let queued_assets = std::mem::take(&mut prepare_next_frame.assets);
for (handle, material) in queued_assets {
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
match prepare_material2d(
&material,
&render_device,
&images,
&fallback_image,
&pipeline,
) {
Ok(prepared_asset) => {
render_materials.insert(handle, prepared_asset);
}
Err(AsBindGroupError::RetryNextUpdate) => {
prepare_next_frame.assets.push((handle, material));
}
}
}
for removed in std::mem::take(&mut extracted_assets.removed) {
render_materials.remove(&removed);
}
for (handle, material) in std::mem::take(&mut extracted_assets.extracted) {
match prepare_material2d(
&material,
&render_device,
&images,
&fallback_image,
&pipeline,
) {
Ok(prepared_asset) => {
render_materials.insert(handle, prepared_asset);
}
Err(AsBindGroupError::RetryNextUpdate) => {
prepare_next_frame.assets.push((handle, material));
}
}
}
}
fn prepare_material2d<M: Material2d>(
material: &M,
render_device: &RenderDevice,
images: &RenderAssets<Image>,
fallback_image: &FallbackImage,
pipeline: &Material2dPipeline<M>,
) -> Result<PreparedMaterial2d<M>, AsBindGroupError> {
let prepared = material.as_bind_group(
&pipeline.material2d_layout,
render_device,
images,
fallback_image,
)?;
Ok(PreparedMaterial2d {
bindings: prepared.bindings,
bind_group: prepared.bind_group,
key: prepared.data,
})
}
/// A component bundle for entities with a [`Mesh2dHandle`] and a [`Material2d`].
#[derive(Bundle, Clone)]
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
pub struct MaterialMesh2dBundle<M: Material2d> {
pub mesh: Mesh2dHandle,
pub material: Handle<M>,
pub transform: Transform,
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
/// User indication of whether an entity is visible
pub visibility: Visibility,
/// Algorithmically-computed indication of whether an entity is visible and should be extracted for rendering
pub computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility,
}
Support AsBindGroup for 2d materials as well (#5312) Port changes made to Material in #5053 to Material2d as well. This is more or less an exact copy of the implementation in bevy_pbr; I simply pretended the API existed, then copied stuff over until it started building and the shapes example was working again. # Objective The changes in #5053 makes it possible to add custom materials with a lot less boiler plate. However, the implementation isn't shared with Material 2d as it's a kind of fork of the bevy_pbr version. It should be possible to use AsBindGroup on the 2d version as well. ## Solution This makes the same kind of changes in Material2d in bevy_sprite. This makes the following work: ```rust //! Draws a circular purple bevy in the middle of the screen using a custom shader use bevy::{ prelude::*, reflect::TypeUuid, render::render_resource::{AsBindGroup, ShaderRef}, sprite::{Material2d, Material2dPlugin, MaterialMesh2dBundle}, }; fn main() { App::new() .add_plugins(DefaultPlugins) .add_plugin(Material2dPlugin::<CustomMaterial>::default()) .add_startup_system(setup) .run(); } /// set up a simple 2D scene fn setup( mut commands: Commands, mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>, mut materials: ResMut<Assets<CustomMaterial>>, asset_server: Res<AssetServer>, ) { commands.spawn_bundle(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(shape::Circle::new(50.).into()).into(), material: materials.add(CustomMaterial { color: Color::PURPLE, color_texture: Some(asset_server.load("branding/icon.png")), }), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-100., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); commands.spawn_bundle(Camera2dBundle::default()); } /// The Material2d trait is very configurable, but comes with sensible defaults for all methods. /// You only need to implement functions for features that need non-default behavior. See the Material api docs for details! impl Material2d for CustomMaterial { fn fragment_shader() -> ShaderRef { "shaders/custom_material.wgsl".into() } } // This is the struct that will be passed to your shader #[derive(AsBindGroup, TypeUuid, Debug, Clone)] #[uuid = "f690fdae-d598-45ab-8225-97e2a3f056e0"] pub struct CustomMaterial { #[uniform(0)] color: Color, #[texture(1)] #[sampler(2)] color_texture: Option<Handle<Image>>, } ```
2022-07-16 00:20:04 +00:00
impl<M: Material2d> Default for MaterialMesh2dBundle<M> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
mesh: Default::default(),
material: Default::default(),
transform: Default::default(),
global_transform: Default::default(),
visibility: Default::default(),
computed_visibility: Default::default(),
}
}
}