# Objective
The `queue()` method is an optional trait method which is necessary for
deferred operations (such as command queues) to work properly in the
context of an observer.
This method was omitted from the proc_macro blanket implementation of
`ParamSet` for tuples; as a result, SystemParams with deferred
application (such as Commands) would not work in observers if they were
part of a ParamSet.
This appears to have been a simple omission, as `queue()` was already
implemented for the separate blanket implementation of `ParamSet` for
`Vec<T>`. In both cases, it is a simple pass-through to the component
SystemParams.
## Solution
Add the `queue()` method implementation to the `impl_param_set` proco
macro.
## Testing
Added a unit test which clearly demonstrates the issue. It fails before
the fix, and passes afterwards.
---
# Objective
- Closes#15577
## Solution
The following functions can now also take multiple component IDs and
return multiple pointers back:
- `EntityRef::get_by_id`
- `EntityMut::get_by_id`
- `EntityMut::into_borrow_by_id`
- `EntityMut::get_mut_by_id`
- `EntityMut::into_mut_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::get_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_borrow_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::get_mut_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_by_id`
If you pass in X, you receive Y:
- give a single `ComponentId`, receive a single `Ptr`/`MutUntyped`
- give a `[ComponentId; N]` (array), receive a `[Ptr; N]`/`[MutUntyped;
N]`
- give a `&[ComponentId; N]` (array), receive a `[Ptr; N]`/`[MutUntyped;
N]`
- give a `&[ComponentId]` (slice), receive a
`Vec<Ptr>`/`Vec<MutUntyped>`
- give a `&HashSet<ComponentId>`, receive a `HashMap<ComponentId,
Ptr>`/`HashMap<ComponentId, MutUntyped>`
## Testing
- Added 4 new tests.
---
## Migration Guide
- The following functions now return an `Result<_,
EntityComponentError>` instead of a `Option<_>`: `EntityRef::get_by_id`,
`EntityMut::get_by_id`, `EntityMut::into_borrow_by_id`,
`EntityMut::get_mut_by_id`, `EntityMut::into_mut_by_id`,
`EntityWorldMut::get_by_id`, `EntityWorldMut::into_borrow_by_id`,
`EntityWorldMut::get_mut_by_id`, `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_by_id`
# Objective
Relevant: #15208
## Solution
I went ahead and added the variadics documentation in all applicable
locations.
## Testing
- I built the documentation and inspected it to see whether the feature
is there.
As discussed in #15521
- Partial revert of #14897, reverting the change to the methods to
consume `self`
- The `insert_if` method is kept
The migration guide of #14897 should be removed
Closes#15521
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Previous PR https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/14549 was closed in
error and couldn't be reopened since I had updated the branch
😿
# Objective
Fixes#14465
## Solution
`ReflectMapEntities` now works similarly to `MapEntities` in that it
works on the reflected value itself rather than the component in the
world after insertion. This makes it so that observers see the remapped
entities on insertion rather than the entity IDs from the scene.
`ReflectMapEntities` now works for both components and resources, so we
only need the one.
## Testing
* New unit test for `Observer`s + `DynamicScene`s
* New unit test for `Observer`s + `Scene`s
* Open to suggestions for other tests!
---
## Migration Guide
- Consumers of `ReflectMapEntities` will need to call `map_entities` on
values prior to inserting them into the world.
- Implementors of `MapEntities` will need to remove the `mappings`
method, which is no longer needed for `ReflectMapEntities` and has been
removed from the trait.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15540
End-users risk using `World::flush_commands` instead of `World::flush`,
which panics if any queued commands are `spawn`. Hiding
`World::flush_commands` would help avoid calling a potentially panicky
function, and helps alleviate end-user API confusion.
## Solution
This PR updates the function visibility to crate-level, like
`World::flush_entities`, hiding it from the end-user while still making
it accessible for the tests that are currently set up.
## Testing
The change was tested by executing the available tests for `bevy_ecs`.
From what I've gathered, `World::flush_commands` is not used in any
other bevy crate. If further testing is recommended, please inform me!
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15367.
Currently, required components can only be defined through the `require`
macro attribute. While this should be used in most cases, there are also
several instances where you may want to define requirements at runtime,
commonly in plugins.
Example use cases:
- Require components only if the relevant optional plugins are enabled.
For example, a `SleepTimer` component (for physics) is only relevant if
the `SleepPlugin` is enabled.
- Third party crates can define their own requirements for first party
types. For example, "each `Handle<Mesh>` should require my custom
rendering data components". This also gets around the orphan rule.
- Generic plugins that add marker components based on the existence of
other components, like a generic `ColliderPlugin<C: AnyCollider>` that
wants to add a `ColliderMarker` component for all types of colliders.
- This is currently relevant for the retained render world in #15320.
The `ExtractComponentPlugin<C>` should add `SyncToRenderWorld` to all
components that should be extracted. This is currently done with
observers, which is more expensive than required components, and causes
archetype moves.
- Replace some built-in components with custom versions. For example, if
`GlobalTransform` required `Transform` through `TransformPlugin`, but we
wanted to use a `CustomTransform` type, we could replace
`TransformPlugin` with our own plugin. (This specific example isn't
good, but there are likely better use cases where this may be useful)
See #15367 for more in-depth reasoning.
## Solution
Add `register_required_components::<T, R>` and
`register_required_components_with::<T, R>` methods for `Default` and
custom constructors respectively. These methods exist on `App` and
`World`.
```rust
struct BirdPlugin;
impl Plugin for BirdPlugin {
fn plugin(app: &mut App) {
// Make `Bird` require `Wings` with a `Default` constructor.
app.register_required_components::<Bird, Wings>();
// Make `Wings` require `FlapSpeed` with a custom constructor.
// Fun fact: Some hummingbirds can flutter their wings 80 times per second!
app.register_required_components_with::<Wings, FlapSpeed>(|| FlapSpeed::from_duration(1.0 / 80.0));
}
}
```
The custom constructor is a function pointer to match the `require` API,
though it could take a raw value too.
Requirement inheritance works similarly as with the `require` attribute.
If `Bird` required `FlapSpeed` directly, it would take precedence over
indirectly requiring it through `Wings`. The same logic applies to all
levels of the inheritance tree.
Note that registering the same component requirement more than once will
panic, similarly to trying to add multiple component hooks of the same
type to the same component. This avoids constructor conflicts and
confusing ordering issues.
### Implementation
Runtime requirements have two additional challenges in comparison to the
`require` attribute.
1. The `require` attribute uses recursion and macros with clever
ordering to populate hash maps of required components for each component
type. The expected semantics are that "more specific" requirements
override ones deeper in the inheritance tree. However, at runtime, there
is no representation of how "specific" each requirement is.
2. If you first register the requirement `X -> Y`, and later register `Y
-> Z`, then `X` should also indirectly require `Z`. However, `Y` itself
doesn't know that it is required by `X`, so it's not aware that it
should update the list of required components for `X`.
My solutions to these problems are:
1. Store the depth in the inheritance tree for each entry of a given
component's `RequiredComponents`. This is used to determine how
"specific" each requirement is. For `require`-based registration, these
depths are computed as part of the recursion.
2. Store and maintain a `required_by` list in each component's
`ComponentInfo`, next to `required_components`. For `require`-based
registration, these are also added after each registration, as part of
the recursion.
When calling `register_required_components`, it works as follows:
1. Get the required components of `Foo`, and check that `Bar` isn't
already a *direct* requirement.
3. Register `Bar` as a required component for `Foo`, and add `Foo` to
the `required_by` list for `Bar`.
4. Find and register all indirect requirements inherited from `Bar`,
adding `Foo` to the `required_by` list for each component.
5. Iterate through components that require `Foo`, registering the new
inherited requires for them as indirect requirements.
The runtime registration is likely slightly more expensive than the
`require` version, but it is a one-time cost, and quite negligible in
practice, unless projects have hundreds or thousands of runtime
requirements. I have not benchmarked this however.
This does also add a small amount of extra cost to the `require`
attribute for updating `required_by` lists, but I expect it to be very
minor.
## Testing
I added some tests that are copies of the `require` versions, as well as
some tests that are more specific to the runtime implementation. I might
add a few more tests though.
## Discussion
- Is `register_required_components` a good name? Originally I went for
`register_component_requirement` to be consistent with
`register_component_hooks`, but the general feature is often referred to
as "required components", which is why I changed it to
`register_required_components`.
- Should we *not* panic for duplicate requirements? If so, should they
just be ignored, or should the latest registration overwrite earlier
ones?
- If we do want to panic for duplicate, conflicting registrations,
should we at least not panic if the registrations are *exactly* the
same, i.e. same component and same constructor? The current
implementation panics for all duplicate direct registrations regardless
of the constructor.
## Next Steps
- Allow `register_required_components` to take a `Bundle` instead of a
single required component.
- I could also try to do it in this PR if that would be preferable.
- Not directly related, but archetype invariants?
# Objective
Add a `Populated` system parameter that acts like `Query`, but prevents
system from running if there are no matching entities.
Fixes: #15302
## Solution
Implement the system param which newtypes the `Query`.
The only change is new validation, which fails if query is empty.
The new system param is used in `fallible_params` example.
## Testing
Ran `fallible_params` example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Provide a generic and _reflectable_ way to iterate over contained
entities
## Solution
Adds two new traits:
* `VisitEntities`: Reflectable iteration, accepts a closure rather than
producing an iterator. Implemented by default for `IntoIterator`
implementing types. A proc macro is also provided.
* A `Mut` variant of the above. Its derive macro uses the same field
attribute to avoid repetition.
## Testing
Added a test for `VisitEntities` that also transitively tests its derive
macro as well as the default `MapEntities` impl.
# Objective
`World::flush_commands` will cause a panic with `error[B0003]: Could not
insert a bundle [...] for entity [...] because it doesn't exist in this
World` if there was a `spawn` command in the queue and you should
instead use `flush` for this but this isn't mentioned in the docs
## Solution
Add a note to the docs suggesting to use `World::flush` in this context.
This error doesn't appear to happen with `spawn_batch` so I didn't add
that to the note although you can cause it with
`commands.spawn_empty().insert(...)` but I wasn't sure that was worth
the documentation complexity as it is pretty unlikely (and equivalent to
`commands.spawn(...)`.
# Objective
Improve the documentation of `SystemParamBuilder`. Not all builder types
have documentation, and the documentation is spread around and not
linked together well.
## Solution
Reorganize `SystemParamBuilder` docs and examples. All builder types now
have their own examples, and the list of builder types is linked from
the `SystemParamBuilder` trait. Add some examples to `FilteredEntityRef`
and `FilteredEntityMut` so that `QueryParamBuilder` can reference them.
# Objective
Fixes#15394
## Solution
Observers now validate params.
System registry has a new error variant for when system running fails
due to invalid parameters.
Run once now returns a `Result<Out, RunOnceError>` instead of `Out`.
This is more inline with system registry, which also returns a result.
I'll address warning messages in #15500.
## Testing
Added one test for each case.
---
## Migration Guide
- `RunSystemOnce::run_system_once` and
`RunSystemOnce::run_system_once_with` now return a `Result<Out>` instead
of just `Out`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
# Objective
- Resolves#15453
## Solution
- Added new `World::resource_id` and `World::register_resource` methods
to support this feature
- Added new `ReflectResource::register_resource` method, and new pointer
to this new function
- Added new `ReflectComponent::register_component`
## Testing
- Tested this locally, but couldn't test the entire crate locally, just
this new feature, expect that CI will do the rest of the work.
---
## Showcase
```rs
#[derive(Component, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct MyComp;
let mut world = World::new();
let mut registry = TypeRegistration::of::<MyComp>();
registry.insert::<ReflectComponent>(FromType::<MyComp>::from_type());
let data = registry.data::<ReflectComponent>().unwrap();
// Its now possible to register the Component in the world this way
let component_id = data.register_component(&mut world);
// They will be the same
assert_eq!(component_id, world.component_id::<MyComp>().unwrap());
```
```rs
#[derive(Resource, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Resource)]
struct MyResource;
let mut world = World::new();
let mut registry = TypeRegistration::of::<MyResource>();
registry.insert::<ReflectResource>(FromType::<MyResource>::from_type());
let data = registry.data::<ReflectResource>().unwrap();
// Same with resources
let component_id = data.register_resource(&mut world);
// They match
assert_eq!(component_id, world.resource_id::<MyResource>().unwrap());
```
# Objective
Add the following system params:
- `QuerySingle<D, F>` - Valid if only one matching entity exists,
- `Option<QuerySingle<D, F>>` - Valid if zero or one matching entity
exists.
As @chescock pointed out, we don't need `Mut` variants.
Fixes: #15264
## Solution
Implement the type and both variants of system params.
Also implement `ReadOnlySystemParam` for readonly queries.
Added a new ECS example `fallible_params` which showcases `SingleQuery`
usage.
In the future we might want to add `NonEmptyQuery`,
`NonEmptyEventReader` and `Res` to it (or maybe just stop at mentioning
it).
## Testing
Tested with the example.
There is a lot of warning spam so we might want to implement #15391.
> [!NOTE]
> This is my first PR, so if something is incorrect
> or missing, please let me know :3
# Objective
- Clarifies `spawn`, `spawn_batch` and `ParallelCommands` docs about
performance and use cases
- Fixes#15472
## Solution
Add comments to `spawn`, `spawn_batch` and `ParallelCommands` to clarify
the
intended use case and link to other/better ways of doing spawning things
for
certain use cases.
## Objective
- Adopted #6396
## Solution
Same as #6396, we use a compile-time checked `StorageSwitch` union type
to select the fetch data based on the component's storage type, saving
>= 8 bytes per component fetch in a given query.
Note: We forego the Query iteration change as it exists in a slightly
different form now on main.
## Testing
- All current tests pass locally.
---------
Co-authored-by: james7132 <contact@jamessliu.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#6370
- Closes#6581
## Solution
- Added the following lints to the workspace:
- `std_instead_of_core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
## Migration Guide
The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.
## Notes
- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#15451
## Migration Guide
- `World::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`.
- `World::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to
`register_component_with_descriptor`.
- `World::init_bundle` has been renamed to `register_bundle`.
- `Components::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`.
- `Components::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to
`register_component_with_descriptor`.
- `Components::init_resource` has been renamed to `register_resource`.
- `Components::init_non_send` had been renamed to `register_non_send`.
# Objective
Make it easier to debug why an entity doesn't match a query.
## Solution
List the entities components in `QueryEntityError::QueryDoesNotMatch`'s
message, e.g. `The query does not match the entity 0v1, which has
components foo::Bar, foo::Baz`.
This covers most cases as expected components are typically known and
filtering for change detection is rare when assessing a query by entity
id.
## Testing
Added a test confirming the new message matches the entity's components.
## Migration Guide
- `QueryEntityError` now has a lifetime. Convert it to a custom error if
you need to store it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: poopy <gonesbird@gmail.com>
# Objective
- #15331
## Solution
-Just changed it to Trigger since the function signature shows it's just
a wrapper trait
## Testing
Will let tests pass
---------
Co-authored-by: Fernan Lukban <fernanlukban@gmail.co>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antony <antony.m.3012@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Add a test case for #14300Fixes#14300
## Solution
`SceneEntityMapper` relies on operations on `Entities` that require
flushing in advance, such as `alloc` and `free`. Previously, it wasn't
calling `world.flush_entities()` itself and relied on its caller having
flushed beforehand. This wasn't an issue before observers and hooks were
released, since entity reservation was happening at expected times. Now
that hooks and observers are a thing, they can introduce a need to
flush.
We have a few options:
* Flush after each observer/hook run
* Flush between each paired observer/hook and operation that requires a
flush
* Flush before operations requiring it
The first option for this case seemed trickier to reason about than I
wanted, since it involved the `BundleInserter` and its
`UnsafeWorldCell`, and the second is generally harder to track down. The
third seemed the most straightforward and conventional, since we can see
a flush occurring at the start of a number of `World` methods.
Therefore, we're letting `SceneEntityMapper` be in charge of upholding
its own invariants and calling `flush_entities` when it's created.
## Testing
Added a new test case modeled after #14300
# Objective
- Fixes#15373
- Fixes
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/14920#issuecomment-2370428013
## Solution
- Make `IntoSystem::pipe` and `IntoSystem::map` return two new
(possibly-ZST) types that implement `IntoSystem` and whose `into_system`
method return the systems that were previously being returned by
`IntoSystem::pipe` and `IntoSystem::map`
- Don't eagerly call `IntoSystem::into_system` on the argument given to
`RunSystemCachedWith::new` to avoid losing its ZST-ness
## Testing
- Added a regression test for each issue
## Migration Guide
- `IntoSystem::pipe` and `IntoSystem::map` now return `IntoPipeSystem`
and `IntoAdapterSystem` instead of `PipeSystem` and `AdapterSystem`.
Most notably these types don't implement `System` but rather only
`IntoSystem`.
# Objective
Fixes#14467
Observers and component lifecycle hooks are allowed to perform
operations that subsequently require `Entities` to be flushed, such as
reserving a new entity. If this occurs during an `on_remove` hook or an
`OnRemove` event trigger during an `EntityWorldMut::despawn`, a panic
will occur.
## Solution
Call `world.flush_entities()` after running `on_remove` hooks/observers
during `despawn`
## Testing
Added a new test that fails before the fix and succeeds afterward.
# Objective
Fix "system skipped" warnings when validation fails on systems that
wouldn't run because of run conditions.
## Solution
> I think the error is from a system defined as:
>
> ```rust
> no_gpu_preprocessing::batch_and_prepare_sorted_render_phase::<SPI,
GFBD>
> .run_if(resource_exists::<BatchedInstanceBuffer<GFBD::BufferData>>),
> ```
>
> So the `run_if` was preventing the panics. Maybe we need to skip
validation if `!system_conditions_met`, or at least silence the warning
in that case.
*By @chescock in
https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1287865365312831562*
Validation of system is skipped if the system was already skipped by run
conditions.
## Testing
Ran alien addict example, no more warnings.
# Objective
Fixes#14331
## Solution
- Make `Traversal` a subtrait of `ReadOnlyQueryData`
- Update implementations and usages
## Testing
- Updated unit tests
## Migration Guide
Update implementations of `Traversal`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Currently, the term "value" in the context of reflection is a bit
overloaded.
For one, it can be used synonymously with "data" or "variable". An
example sentence would be "this function takes a reflected value".
However, it is also used to refer to reflected types which are
`ReflectKind::Value`. These types are usually either primitives, opaque
types, or types that don't fall into any other `ReflectKind` (or perhaps
could, but don't due to some limitation/difficulty). An example sentence
would be "this function takes a reflected value type".
This makes it difficult to write good documentation or other learning
material without causing some amount of confusion to readers. Ideally,
we'd be able to move away from the `ReflectKind::Value` usage and come
up with a better term.
## Solution
This PR replaces the terminology of "value" with "opaque" across
`bevy_reflect`. This includes in documentation, type names, variant
names, and macros.
The term "opaque" was chosen because that's essentially how the type is
treated within the reflection API. In other words, its internal
structure is hidden. All we can do is work with the type itself.
### Primitives
While primitives are not technically opaque types, I think it's still
clearer to refer to them as "opaque" rather than keep the confusing
"value" terminology.
We could consider adding another concept for primitives (e.g.
`ReflectKind::Primitive`), but I'm not sure that provides a lot of
benefit right now. In most circumstances, they'll be treated just like
an opaque type. They would also likely use the same macro (or two copies
of the same macro but with different names).
## Testing
You can test locally by running:
```
cargo test --package bevy_reflect --all-features
```
---
## Migration Guide
The reflection concept of "value type" has been replaced with a clearer
"opaque type". The following renames have been made to account for this:
- `ReflectKind::Value` → `ReflectKind::Opaque`
- `ReflectRef::Value` → `ReflectRef::Opaque`
- `ReflectMut::Value` → `ReflectMut::Opaque`
- `ReflectOwned::Value` → `ReflectOwned::Opaque`
- `TypeInfo::Value` → `TypeInfo::Opaque`
- `ValueInfo` → `OpaqueInfo`
- `impl_reflect_value!` → `impl_reflect_opaque!`
- `impl_from_reflect_value!` → `impl_from_reflect_opaque!`
Additionally, declaring your own opaque types no longer uses
`#[reflect_value]`. This attribute has been replaced by
`#[reflect(opaque)]`:
```rust
// BEFORE
#[derive(Reflect)]
#[reflect_value(Default)]
struct MyOpaqueType(u32);
// AFTER
#[derive(Reflect)]
#[reflect(opaque)]
#[reflect(Default)]
struct MyOpaqueType(u32);
```
Note that the order in which `#[reflect(opaque)]` appears does not
matter.
# Objective
- Fixes#14924
- Closes#9584
## Solution
- We introduce a new trait, `SystemInput`, that serves as a type
function from the `'static` form of the input, to its lifetime'd
version, similarly to `SystemParam` or `WorldQuery`.
- System functions now take the lifetime'd wrapped version,
`SystemInput::Param<'_>`, which prevents the issue presented in #14924
(i.e. `InRef<T>`).
- Functions for running systems now take the lifetime'd unwrapped
version, `SystemInput::Inner<'_>` (i.e. `&T`).
- Due to the above change, system piping had to be re-implemented as a
standalone type, rather than `CombinatorSystem` as it was previously.
- Removes the `Trigger<'static, E, B>` transmute in observer runner
code.
## Testing
- All current tests pass.
- Added additional tests and doc-tests.
---
## Showcase
```rust
let mut world = World::new();
let mut value = 2;
// Currently possible:
fn square(In(input): In<usize>) -> usize {
input * input
}
value = world.run_system_once_with(value, square);
// Now possible:
fn square_mut(InMut(input): InMut<usize>) {
*input *= *input;
}
world.run_system_once_with(&mut value, square_mut);
// Or:
fn square_ref(InRef(input): InRef<usize>) -> usize {
*input * *input
}
value = world.run_system_once_with(&value, square_ref);
```
## Migration Guide
- All current explicit usages of the following types must be changed in
the way specified:
- `SystemId<I, O>` to `SystemId<In<I>, O>`
- `System<In = T>` to `System<In = In<T>>`
- `IntoSystem<I, O, M>` to `IntoSystem<In<I>, O, M>`
- `Condition<M, T>` to `Condition<M, In<T>>`
- `In<Trigger<E, B>>` is no longer a valid input parameter type. Use
`Trigger<E, B>` directly, instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giacomo Stevanato <giaco.stevanato@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15351
## Solution
- Created new external crate and ported over the code
## Testing
- CI
## Migration guide
Replace references to `bevy_utils::ShortName` with
`disqualified::ShortName`.
Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating
`Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or
`MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can
animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI,
as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI
elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be
animated instead.
This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate
arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a
low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation
behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait,
`AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single
interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for
translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you
can migrate by simply changing your code from
`Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and
likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights.
An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a
text section follows:
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct FontSizeProperty;
impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty {
type Component = Text;
type Property = f32;
fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut
Self::Property> {
Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size)
}
}
In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include
an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection
system. That can be a follow-up.
This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to
widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all
components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead
over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in
order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as
the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that
benchmark and have found no significant regressions.
A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to
use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and
color, which wasn't possible before this patch.
## Showcase
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97
## Migration Guide
* Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace
`Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`,
`Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with
`Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`,
`Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and
`Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
# Objective
The goal of this PR is to introduce `SystemParam` validation in order to
reduce runtime panics.
Fixes#15265
## Solution
`SystemParam` now has a new method `validate_param(...) -> bool`, which
takes immutable variants of `get_param` arguments. The returned value
indicates whether the parameter can be acquired from the world. If
parameters cannot be acquired for a system, it won't be executed,
similarly to run conditions. This reduces panics when using params like
`Res`, `ResMut`, etc. as well as allows for new, ergonomic params like
#15264 or #15302.
Param validation happens at the level of executors. All validation
happens directly before executing a system, in case of normal systems
they are skipped, in case of conditions they return false.
Warning about system skipping is primitive and subject to change in
subsequent PRs.
## Testing
Two executor tests check that all executors:
- skip systems which have invalid parameters:
- piped systems get skipped together,
- dependent systems still run correctly,
- skip systems with invalid run conditions:
- system conditions have invalid parameters,
- system set conditions have invalid parameters.
# Objective
Working with `World` is painful due to lifetime issues and a lack of
ergonomics, so you may want to delegate to the system API. Your current
options are:
- `world.run_system_once`, which initializes the system each time it's
called (performance cost) and doesn't support `Local`. The docs
recommend users not use this method outside of diagnostic use cases like
unit tests.
- `world.run_system`, which requires you to register the system and
store the `SystemId` somewhere (made easier by implementing `FromWorld`
for a newtyped `Local`, unless you're in e.g. a custom `Command` impl).
These options work, but you're choosing between a performance cost and
an ergonomic challenge.
## Solution
Provide a cached `run_system` API that accepts an `S: IntoSystem` and
checks for a `CachedSystemId<S::System>(SystemId)` resource. If it
doesn't exist, it will register the system and save its `SystemId` in
that resource.
In other words, it hides the "save the `SystemId` in a `Local` or
`Resource`" pattern as an implementation detail.
Prior work: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/10469.
## Testing
This approach worked in a proof-of-concept:
b34ee29531/src/util/patch/run_system_cached.rs (L35).
A new unit test was added and it passes in CI.
# Objective
- Goal is to minimize bevy_utils #11478
## Solution
- Move the file short_name wholesale into bevy_reflect
## Testing
- Unit tests
- CI
## Migration Guide
- References to `bevy_utils::ShortName` should instead now be
`bevy_reflect::ShortName`.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
Closes#11825
## Solution
Change return type of `get_resource_ref` and `resource_ref` from `Res`
to `Ref` and implement `From Res<T> for Ref<T>`.
# Objective
> Rust 1.81 released the #[expect(...)] attribute, which works like
#[allow(...)] but throws a warning if the lint isn't raised. This is
preferred to #[allow(...)] because it tells us when it can be removed.
- Adopts the parts of #15118 that are complete, and updates the branch
so it can be merged.
- There were a few conflicts, let me know if I misjudged any of 'em.
Alice's
[recommendation](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15059#issuecomment-2349263900)
seems well-taken, let's do this crate by crate now that @BD103 has done
the lion's share of this!
(Relates to, but doesn't yet completely finish #15059.)
Crates this _doesn't_ cover:
- bevy_input
- bevy_gilrs
- bevy_window
- bevy_winit
- bevy_state
- bevy_render
- bevy_picking
- bevy_core_pipeline
- bevy_sprite
- bevy_text
- bevy_pbr
- bevy_ui
- bevy_gltf
- bevy_gizmos
- bevy_dev_tools
- bevy_internal
- bevy_dylib
---------
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Frankel <ben.frankel7@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antony <antony.m.3012@gmail.com>
No hard feelings if you don't want to make this change. This is just
something I stumbled over in my very first read of the `bevy_ecs` crate.
# Objective
- the general goal here is to improve DX slightly
- make the code easier to read in general. The previous names make the
code harder to read, especially since they are so similar.
## Solution
- choose more specific names for the fields
- `index_iter` -> `freelist_indices` : "freelist" is a well established
term in the rest of the docs in this module, so we might want to reuse
it
- `index_range` -> `new_indices` : Nothing besides the doc comment
stated that these indices were actually new/fresh
## Testing
Note that the fields are private so that this is no breaking change.
They are also only used in this one module.
# Objective
- The multithreaded executor has some weird UB related to stacked
borrows and async blocks
- See my explanation on discord
https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1286359267921887232
- Closes#15296 (can this be used to close PRs?)
## Solution
- Don't create a `&mut World` reference outside `async` blocks and then
capture it, but instead directly create it inside the `async` blocks.
This avoids it being captured, which has some weird requirement on its
validity.
## Testing
- Added a regression test
# Objective
- I was running miri locally to check the UB in #15276 and it detected
an unrelated memory leak, due to the `RawCommandQueue` changes. (I
probably should have turned the leak detection off because we do
purposely leak interned string labels and I assume that's why CI didn't
detect it.)
## Solution
- The memory allocated to `RawCommandQueue` needs to be manually
dropped. This was being done for `bytes` and `cursor`, but was missed
for `panic_recovery`.
## Testing
- Ran miri locally and the related memory leaks errors when away.
`ShortName` is lazily evaluated and does not allocate, instead providing
`Display` and `Debug` implementations which write directly to a
formatter using the original algorithm. When using `ShortName` in format
strings (`panic`, `dbg`, `format`, etc.) you can directly use the
`ShortName` type. If you require a `String`, simply call
`ShortName(...).to_string()`.
# Objective
- Remove the requirement for allocation when using `get_short_name`
## Solution
- Added new type `ShortName` which wraps a name and provides its own
`Debug` and `Display` implementations, using the original
`get_short_name` algorithm without the need for allocating.
- Removed `get_short_name`, as `ShortName(...)` is more performant and
ergonomic.
- Added `ShortName::of::<T>` method to streamline the common use-case
for name shortening.
## Testing
- CI
## Migration Guide
### For `format!`, `dbg!`, `panic!`, etc.
```rust
// Before
panic!("{} is too short!", get_short_name(name));
// After
panic!("{} is too short!", ShortName(name));
```
### Need a `String` Value
```rust
// Before
let short: String = get_short_name(name);
// After
let short: String = ShortName(name).to_string();
```
## Notes
`ShortName` lazily evaluates, and directly writes to a formatter via
`Debug` and `Display`, which removes the need to allocate a `String`
when printing a shortened type name. Because the implementation has been
moved into the `fmt` method, repeated printing of the `ShortName` type
may be less performant than converting it into a `String`. However, no
instances of this are present in Bevy, and the user can get the original
behaviour by calling `.to_string()` at no extra cost.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
It's convenient to be able to modify a component if it exist, and insert
a default value if it doesn't. You can already do most of this with
`EntityCommands::insert_if_new`, and all of this using a custom command.
However, that does not spark joy in my opinion.
Closes#10669
## Solution
Introduce a new commands type `EntityEntryCommands`, along with a method
to access it, `EntityCommands::entry`.
`EntityEntryCommands` exposes a subset of the entry API (`and_modify`,
`or_insert`, etc), however it's not an enum so it doesn't allow pattern
matching. Also, `or_insert` won't return the component because it's all
based on commands.
## Testing
Added a new test `entity_commands_entry`.
---
## Showcase
```rust
commands
.entity(player)
.entry::<Level>()
.and_modify(|mut lvl| lvl.0 += 1)
.or_default();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
Enabled `check-private-items` in `clippy.toml` and then fixed the
resulting errors. Most of these were simply misformatted and of the
remaining:
- ~Added `#[allow(clippy::missing_safety_doc)]` to~ Removed unsafe from
a pair of functions in `bevy_utils/futures` which are only unsafe so
that they can be passed to a function which requires `unsafe fn`
- Removed `unsafe` from `UnsafeWorldCell::observers` as from what I can
tell it is always safe like `components`, `bundles` etc. (this should be
checked)
- Added safety docs to:
- `Bundles::get_storage_unchecked`: Based on the function that writes to
`dynamic_component_storages`
- `Bundles::get_storages_unchecked`: Based on the function that writes
to `dynamic_bundle_storages`
- `QueryIterationCursor::init_empty`: Duplicated from `init`
- `QueryIterationCursor::peek_last`: Thanks Giooschi (also added
internal unsafe blocks)
- `tests::drop_ptr`: Moved safety comment out to the doc string
This lint would also apply to `missing_errors_doc`, `missing_panics_doc`
and `unnecessary_safety_doc` if we chose to enable any of those at some
point, although there is an open
[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13074) to
separate these options.
# Objective
Two of the `IntoSystemConfigs` `impl`s are out of place near the top of
the file.
## Solution
Put them below the `IntoSystemConfigs` trait definition, alongside the
other `impl`.
This commit adds two new `WorldQuery` types: `EntityRefExcept` and
`EntityMutExcept`. These types work just like `EntityRef` and
`EntityMut`, but they prevent access to a statically-specified list of
components. For example, `EntityMutExcept<(AnimationPlayer,
Handle<AnimationGraph>)>` provides mutable access to all components
except for `AnimationPlayer` and `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. These types
are useful when you need to be able to process arbitrary queries while
iterating over the results of another `EntityMut` query.
The motivating use case is *generalized animation*, which is an upcoming
feature that allows animation of any component property, not just
rotation, translation, scaling, or morph weights. To implement this, we
must change the current `AnyOf<(&mut Transform, &mut MorphWeights)>` to
instead be `EntityMutExcept<(AnimationPlayer, Handle<AnimationGraph>)>`.
It's possible to use `FilteredEntityMut` in conjunction with a
dynamically-generated system instead, but `FilteredEntityMut` isn't
optimized for the use case of a large number of allowed components
coupled with a small set of disallowed components. No amount of
optimization of `FilteredEntityMut` produced acceptable performance on
the `many_foxes` benchmark. `Query<EntityMut, Without<AnimationPlayer>>`
will not suffice either, as it's legal and idiomatic for an
`AnimationTarget` and an `AnimationPlayer` to coexist on the same
entity.
An alternate proposal was to implement a somewhat-more-general
`Except<Q, CL>` feature, where Q is a `WorldQuery` and CL is a
`ComponentList`. I wasn't able to implement that proposal in a
reasonable way, because of the fact that methods like
`EntityMut::get_mut` and `EntityRef::get` are inherent methods instead
of methods on `WorldQuery`, and therefore there was no way to delegate
methods like `get` and `get_mut` to the inner query in a generic way.
Refactoring those methods into a trait would probably be possible.
However, I didn't see a use case for a hypothetical `Except` with
arbitrary queries: `Query<Except<(&Transform, &Visibility),
Visibility>>` would just be a complicated equivalent to
`Query<&Transform>`, for instance. So, out of a desire for simplicity, I
omitted a generic `Except` mechanism.
I've tested the performance of generalized animation on `many_foxes` and
found that, with this patch, `animate_targets` has a 7.4% slowdown over
`main`. With `FilteredEntityMut` optimized to use `Arc<Access>`, the
slowdown is 75.6%, due to contention on the reference count. Without
`Arc<Access>`, the slowdown is even worse, over 2x.
## Testing
New tests have been added that check that `EntityRefExcept` and
`EntityMutExcept` allow and disallow access to components properly and
that the query engine can correctly reject conflicting queries involving
those types.
A Tracy profile of `many_foxes` with 10,000 foxes showing generalized
animation using `FilteredEntityMut` (red) vs. main (yellow) is as
follows:
A Tracy profile of `many_foxes` with 10,000 foxes showing generalized
animation using this `EntityMutExcept` (yellow) vs. main (red) is as
follows:
# Objective
- Fixes#15106
## Solution
- Trivial refactor to rename the method. The duplicate method `push` was
removed as well. This will simpify the API and make the semantics more
clear. `Add` implies that the action happens immediately, whereas in
reality, the command is queued to be run eventually.
- `ChildBuilder::add_command` has similarly been renamed to
`queue_command`.
## Testing
Unit tests should suffice for this simple refactor.
---
## Migration Guide
- `Commands::add` and `Commands::push` have been replaced with
`Commnads::queue`.
- `ChildBuilder::add_command` has been renamed to
`ChildBuilder::queue_command`.
# Objective
Currently the resource doesn't get dropped if thread panics. This is
presumably to prevent !SEND resource from being dropped by wrong thread.
But, this logic is not needed for SEND resources. So we don't need this
check for SEND resource.
Fixes#15144
## Solution
We check if resource is !SEND before, validating that correct thread is
dropping the resource.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
I did run cargo test on bevy.
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
No
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
Nothing special
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
x86_64 desktop
# Objective
- Fixes#15236
## Solution
- Use bevy_math::ops instead of std floating point operations.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
Unit tests and `cargo run -p ci -- test`
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
Execute `cargo run -p ci -- test` on Windows.
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
Windows
## Migration Guide
- Not a breaking change
- Projects should use bevy math where applicable
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: IQuick 143 <IQuick143cz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Adds the missing API commands `insert_if_new_and` and
`try_insert_if_new_and` (resolves#15105)
- Adds some test coverage for existing insert commands
## Testing
- Implemented additional unit tests to add coverage
# Objective
Right now, `DynSystemParam::downcast()` always requires the type
parameter to be specified with a turbofish. Make it so that it can be
inferred from the use of the return value, like:
```rust
fn expects_res_a(mut param: DynSystemParam) {
let res: Res<A> = param.downcast().unwrap();
}
```
## Solution
The reason this doesn't currently work is that the type parameter is a
`'static` version of the `SystemParam` so that it can be used with
`Any::downcast_mut()`. Change the method signature so that the type
parameter matches the return type, and use `T::Item<'static, 'static>`
to get the `'static` version. That means we wind up returning a
`T::Item<'static, 'static>::Item<'w, 's>`, so constrain that to be equal
to `T`. That works with every `SystemParam` implementation, since they
have `T::Item == T` up to lifetimes.
# Objective
- fix#12853
- Make `Table::allocate` faster
## Solution
The PR consists of multiple steps:
1) For the component data: create a new data-structure that's similar to
`BlobVec` but doesn't store `len` & `capacity` inside of it: "BlobArray"
(name suggestions welcome)
2) For the `Tick` data: create a new data-structure that's similar to
`ThinSlicePtr` but supports dynamic reallocation: "ThinArrayPtr" (name
suggestions welcome)
3) Create a new data-structure that's very similar to `Column` that
doesn't store `len` & `capacity` inside of it: "ThinColumn"
4) Adjust the `Table` implementation to use `ThinColumn` instead of
`Column`
The result is that only one set of `len` & `capacity` is stored in
`Table`, in `Table::entities`
### Notes Regarding Performance
Apart from shaving off some excess memory in `Table`, the changes have
also brought noteworthy performance improvements:
The previous implementation relied on `Vec::reserve` &
`BlobVec::reserve`, but that redundantly repeated the same if statement
(`capacity` == `len`). Now that check could be made at the `Table` level
because the capacity and length of all the columns are synchronized;
saving N branches per allocation. The result is a respectable
performance improvement per every `Table::reserve` (and subsequently
`Table::allocate`) call.
I'm hesitant to give exact numbers because I don't have a lot of
experience in profiling and benchmarking, but these are the results I
got so far:
*`add_remove_big/table` benchmark after the implementation:*
*`add_remove_big/table` benchmark in main branch (measured in comparison
to the implementation):*
*`add_remove_very_big/table` benchmark after the implementation:*
*`add_remove_very_big/table` benchmark in main branch (measured in
comparison to the implementation):*
cc @james7132 to verify
---
## Changelog
- New data-structure that's similar to `BlobVec` but doesn't store `len`
& `capacity` inside of it: `BlobArray`
- New data-structure that's similar to `ThinSlicePtr` but supports
dynamic allocation:`ThinArrayPtr`
- New data-structure that's very similar to `Column` that doesn't store
`len` & `capacity` inside of it: `ThinColumn`
- Adjust the `Table` implementation to use `ThinColumn` instead of
`Column`
- New benchmark: `add_remove_very_big` to benchmark the performance of
spawning a lot of entities with a lot of components (15) each
## Migration Guide
`Table` now uses `ThinColumn` instead of `Column`. That means that
methods that previously returned `Column`, will now return `ThinColumn`
instead.
`ThinColumn` has a much more limited and low-level API, but you can
still achieve the same things in `ThinColumn` as you did in `Column`.
For example, instead of calling `Column::get_added_tick`, you'd call
`ThinColumn::get_added_ticks_slice` and index it to get the specific
added tick.
---------
Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#14552
- Make the current note of `before` and `after` understandable.
- > The given set is not implicitly added to the schedule when this
system set is added.
## Solution
- Replace note in docs of [`after` and
`before`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/ecs/prelude/trait.IntoSystemConfigs.html#method.before)
- Note of after was removed completely, and links to `before`, because
they notes would be identical.
- Also encourage to use `.chain`, which is much simpler and safer to use
## Testing
- Checked the docs after running `cargo doc` and `cargo run -p ci --
lints`
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- no need to test, but please review the text. If it is still including
the intended message and especially if its understandable.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#14980
## Solution
Only iterate over archetypes containing the component.
## Alternatives
Additionally, for each archetype, cache how many observers are watching
one of its components & use this to speed up the check for each affected
archetype ([implemented
here](55c89aa033)).
Benchmarking showed this to lead only to a minor speedup.
## Testing
There's both already a test checking that observers don't run after
being despawned as well as a regression test for the bug that
necessitates the check this PR optimizes.
# Objective
- Finish resolving https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15125
- Inserting bundles was implemented in
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15128 but removing bundles still
needed to be implemented.
## Solution
- Modified `bevy_ecs::reflect::entity_commands::remove_reflect` to
handle both components and bundles
- Modified documentation of `ReflectCommandExt` methods to reflect that
one can now use bundles with these commands.
## Testing
- Three tests were added to match the ones for inserting components.
# Objective
- Remove any ambiguity around how multiple `Observer` components work on
a single `Entity` by completely removing the concept.
- Fixes#15122
## Solution
- Removed type parameters from `Observer`, relying on a function pointer
to provide type information into the relevant aspects of running an
observer.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally.
- Checked `observers.rs` example continued to function as expected.
## Notes
This communicates to users of observers that only a single `Observer`
can be inserted onto an entity at a time within the established type
system. This has been achieved by erasing the type information from the
stored `ObserverSystem` and retrieving it again using a function
pointer. This has the downside of increasing the size of the `Observer`
component and increases the complexity of the observer runner. However,
this complexity was already present, and is in my opinion a worthwhile
tradeoff for the clearer user experience.
The other notable benefit is users no longer need to use the
`ObserverState` component to filter for `Observer` entities, and can
instead use `Observer` directly.
Technically this is a breaking change, since the type signature for
`Observer` has changed. However, it was so cumbersome to use that I
don't believe there are any instances in the wild of users directly
naming `Observer` types, instead relying on `ObserverState`, and the
methods provided by `App` and `World`. As can be seen in the diff, this
change had very little knock-on effects across Bevy.
## Migration Guide
If you filtered for observers using `Observer<A, B>`, instead filter for
an `Observer`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Smaller scoped version of #13375 without the `_mut` variants which
currently have unsoundness issues.
## Solution
Same as #13375, but without the `_mut` variants.
## Testing
- The same test from #13375 is reused.
---
## Migration Guide
- Renamed `FilteredEntityRef::components` to
`FilteredEntityRef::accessed_components` and
`FilteredEntityMut::components` to
`FilteredEntityMut::accessed_components`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Periwink <charlesbour@gmail.com>
# Objective
`EntityHash` and related types were moved from `bevy_utils` to
`bevy_ecs` in #11498, but seemed to have been accidentally reintroduced
a week later in #11707.
## Solution
Remove the old leftover code.
---
## Migration Guide
- Uses of `bevy::utils::{EntityHash, EntityHasher, EntityHashMap,
EntityHashSet}` now have to be imported from `bevy::ecs::entity`.
# Objective
It's possible to create UB using an implementation of `QueryFilter` that
performs mutable access, but that does not violate any documented safety
invariants.
This code:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
struct Foo(usize);
// This derive is a simple way to get a valid WorldQuery impl. The QueryData impl isn't used.
#[derive(QueryData)]
#[query_data(mutable)]
struct BadFilter<'w> {
foo: &'w mut Foo,
}
impl QueryFilter for BadFilter<'_> {
const IS_ARCHETYPAL: bool = false;
unsafe fn filter_fetch(
fetch: &mut Self::Fetch<'_>,
entity: Entity,
table_row: TableRow,
) -> bool {
// SAFETY: fetch and filter_fetch have the same safety requirements
let f: &mut usize = &mut unsafe { Self::fetch(fetch, entity, table_row) }.foo.0;
println!("Got &mut at {f:p}");
true
}
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.spawn(Foo(0));
world.run_system_once(|query: Query<&Foo, BadFilter>| {
let f: &usize = &query.iter().next().unwrap().0;
println!("Got & at {f:p}");
query.iter().next().unwrap();
println!("Still have & at {f:p}");
});
```
prints:
```
Got &mut at 0x1924b92dfb0
Got & at 0x1924b92dfb0
Got &mut at 0x1924b92dfb0
Still have & at 0x1924b92dfb0
```
Which means it had an `&` and `&mut` alive at the same time.
The only `unsafe` there is around `Self::fetch`, but I believe that call
correctly upholds the safety invariant, and matches what `Added` and
`Changed` do.
## Solution
Make `QueryFilter` an unsafe trait and document the requirement that the
`WorldQuery` implementation be read-only.
## Migration Guide
`QueryFilter` is now an `unsafe trait`. If you were manually
implementing it, you will need to verify that the `WorldQuery`
implementation is read-only and then add the `unsafe` keyword to the
`impl`.
# Objective
A previous issue describes the same problem: #14248.
This particular link was seemingly missed by #14276.
## Solution
- Search repo for `bevyengine.org/learn/errors/#`
- Remove `#`
- Verify link goes to right place
# Objective
- Crate-level prelude modules, such as `bevy_ecs::prelude`, are plagued
with inconsistency! Let's fix it!
## Solution
Format all preludes based on the following rules:
1. All preludes should have brief documentation in the format of:
> The _name_ prelude.
>
> This includes the most common types in this crate, re-exported for
your convenience.
2. All documentation should be outer, not inner. (`///` instead of
`//!`.)
3. No prelude modules should be annotated with `#[doc(hidden)]`. (Items
within them may, though I'm not sure why this was done.)
## Testing
- I manually searched for the term `mod prelude` and updated all
occurrences by hand. 🫠
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- follow of #14049 ,we could use it on our Parallel Iterator,this pr
also unified the used function in both regular iter and parallel
iterations.
## Performance
no performance regression for regular itertaion
3.5X faster in hybrid parallel iteraion,this number is far greater than
the benefits obtained in regular iteration(~1.81) because mutable
iterations on continuous memory can effectively reduce the cost of
mataining core cache coherence
# Objective
Make the documentation for `SystemParamBuilder` nicer by combining the
tuple implementations into a single line of documentation.
## Solution
Use `#[doc(fake_variadic)]` for `SystemParamBuilder` tuple impls.
(This got missed originally because #14050 and #14703 were open at the
same time.)
# Objective
- Fixes#14974
## Solution
- Replace all* instances of `NonZero*` with `NonZero<*>`
## Testing
- CI passed locally.
---
## Notes
Within the `bevy_reflect` implementations for `std` types,
`impl_reflect_value!()` will continue to use the type aliases instead,
as it inappropriately parses the concrete type parameter as a generic
argument. If the `ZeroablePrimitive` trait was stable, or the macro
could be modified to accept a finite list of types, then we could fully
migrate.
# Objective
- Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14961
## Solution
- Check that the archetypes don't contain any other observed components
before unsetting their flags
## Testing
- I added a regression test: `observer_despawn_archetype_flags`
# Objective
Allow `SystemParamBuilder` implementations for custom system parameters
created using `#[derive(SystemParam)]`.
## Solution
Extend the derive macro to accept a `#[system_param(builder)]`
attribute. When present, emit a builder type with a field corresponding
to each field of the param.
## Example
```rust
#[derive(SystemParam)]
#[system_param(builder)]
struct CustomParam<'w, 's> {
query: Query<'w, 's, ()>,
local: Local<'s, usize>,
}
let system = (CustomParamBuilder {
local: LocalBuilder(100),
query: QueryParamBuilder::new(|builder| {
builder.with::<A>();
}),
},)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(|param: CustomParam| *param.local + param.query.iter().count());
```
# Objective
- Fixes#14860
## Solution
- Added a line of documentation to `FromWorld`'s trait definition
mention the `Default` blanket implementation.
- Added custom documentation to the `from_world` method for the
`Default` blanket implementation. This ensures when inspecting the
`from_world` function within an IDE, the tooltip will explicitly state
the `default()` method will be used for any `Default` types.
## Testing
- CI passes.
# Objective
When building a system from `SystemParamBuilder`s and defining the
system as a closure, the compiler should be able to infer the parameter
types from the builder types.
## Solution
Create methods for each arity that take an argument that implements both
`SystemParamFunction` as well as `FnMut(SystemParamItem<P>,...)`. The
explicit `FnMut` constraint will allow the compiler to infer the
necessary higher-ranked lifetimes along with the parameter types.
I wanted to show that this was possible, but I can't tell whether it's
worth the complexity. It requires a separate method for each arity,
which pollutes the docs a bit:
## Example
```rust
let system = (LocalBuilder(0u64), ParamBuilder::local::<u64>())
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(|a, b| *a + *b + 1);
```
# Objective
sending events tends to be low-frequency so ergonomics can be
prioritized over efficiency.
add `Commands::send_event` to send any type of event without needing a
writer in hand.
i don't know how we feel about these kind of ergonomic things, i add
this to all my projects and find it useful. adding `mut
this_particular_event_writer: EventWriter<ThisParticularEvent>` every
time i want to send something is unnecessarily cumbersome.
it also simplifies the "send and receive in the same system" pattern
significantly.
basic example before:
```rs
fn my_func(
q: Query<(Entity, &State)>,
mut damage_event_writer: EventWriter<DamageEvent>,
mut heal_event_writer: EventWriter<HealEvent>,
) {
for (entity, state) in q.iter() {
if let Some(damage) = state.get_damage() {
damage_event_writer.send(DamageEvent { entity, damage });
}
if let Some(heal) = state.get_heal() {
heal_event_writer.send(HealEvent { entity, heal });
}
}
}
```
basic example after:
```rs
import bevy::ecs::event::SendEventEx;
fn my_func(
mut commands: Commands,
q: Query<(Entity, &State)>,
) {
for (entity, state) in q.iter() {
if let Some(damage) = state.get_damage() {
commands.send_event(DamageEvent { entity, damage });
}
if let Some(heal) = state.get_heal() {
commands.send_event(HealEvent { entity, heal });
}
}
}
```
send/receive in the same system before:
```rs
fn send_and_receive_param_set(
mut param_set: ParamSet<(EventReader<DebugEvent>, EventWriter<DebugEvent>)>,
) {
// We must collect the events to resend, because we can't access the writer while we're iterating over the reader.
let mut events_to_resend = Vec::new();
// This is p0, as the first parameter in the `ParamSet` is the reader.
for event in param_set.p0().read() {
if event.resend_from_param_set {
events_to_resend.push(event.clone());
}
}
// This is p1, as the second parameter in the `ParamSet` is the writer.
for mut event in events_to_resend {
event.times_sent += 1;
param_set.p1().send(event);
}
}
```
after:
```rs
use bevy::ecs::event::SendEventEx;
fn send_via_commands_and_receive(
mut reader: EventReader<DebugEvent>,
mut commands: Commands,
) {
for event in reader.read() {
if event.resend_via_commands {
commands.send_event(DebugEvent {
times_sent: event.times_sent + 1,
..event.clone()
});
}
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
## Introduction
This is the first step in my [Next Generation Scene / UI
Proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437).
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7272#14800.
Bevy's current Bundles as the "unit of construction" hamstring the UI
user experience and have been a pain point in the Bevy ecosystem
generally when composing scenes:
* They are an additional _object defining_ concept, which must be
learned separately from components. Notably, Bundles _are not present at
runtime_, which is confusing and limiting.
* They can completely erase the _defining component_ during Bundle init.
For example, `ButtonBundle { style: Style::default(), ..default() }`
_makes no mention_ of the `Button` component symbol, which is what makes
the Entity a "button"!
* They are not capable of representing "dependency inheritance" without
completely non-viable / ergonomically crushing nested bundles. This
limitation is especially painful in UI scenarios, but it applies to
everything across the board.
* They introduce a bunch of additional nesting when defining scenes,
making them ugly to look at
* They introduce component name "stutter": `SomeBundle { component_name:
ComponentName::new() }`
* They require copious sprinklings of `..default()` when spawning them
in Rust code, due to the additional layer of nesting
**Required Components** solve this by allowing you to define which
components a given component needs, and how to construct those
components when they aren't explicitly provided.
This is what a `ButtonBundle` looks like with Bundles (the current
approach):
```rust
#[derive(Component, Default)]
struct Button;
#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct ButtonBundle {
pub button: Button,
pub node: Node,
pub style: Style,
pub interaction: Interaction,
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
pub border_color: BorderColor,
pub border_radius: BorderRadius,
pub image: UiImage,
pub transform: Transform,
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
pub visibility: Visibility,
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
pub z_index: ZIndex,
}
commands.spawn(ButtonBundle {
style: Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
height: Val::Px(50.0),
..default()
},
focus_policy: FocusPolicy::Block,
..default()
})
```
And this is what it looks like with Required Components:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(Node, UiImage)]
struct Button;
commands.spawn((
Button,
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
height: Val::Px(50.0),
..default()
},
FocusPolicy::Block,
));
```
With Required Components, we mention only the most relevant components.
Every component required by `Node` (ex: `Style`, `FocusPolicy`, etc) is
automatically brought in!
### Efficiency
1. At insertion/spawn time, Required Components (including recursive
required components) are initialized and inserted _as if they were
manually inserted alongside the given components_. This means that this
is maximally efficient: there are no archetype or table moves.
2. Required components are only initialized and inserted if they were
not manually provided by the developer. For the code example in the
previous section, because `Style` and `FocusPolicy` are inserted
manually, they _will not_ be initialized and inserted as part of the
required components system. Efficient!
3. The "missing required components _and_ constructors needed for an
insertion" are cached in the "archetype graph edge", meaning they aren't
computed per-insertion. When a component is inserted, the "missing
required components" list is iterated (and that graph edge (AddBundle)
is actually already looked up for us during insertion, because we need
that for "normal" insert logic too).
### IDE Integration
The `#[require(SomeComponent)]` macro has been written in such a way
that Rust Analyzer can provide type-inspection-on-hover and `F12` /
go-to-definition for required components.
### Custom Constructors
The `require` syntax expects a `Default` constructor by default, but it
can be overridden with a custom constructor:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
Node,
Style(button_style),
UiImage
)]
struct Button;
fn button_style() -> Style {
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
..default()
}
}
```
### Multiple Inheritance
You may have noticed by now that this behaves a bit like "multiple
inheritance". One of the problems that this presents is that it is
possible to have duplicate requires for a given type at different levels
of the inheritance tree:
```rust
#[derive(Component)
struct X(usize);
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(X(x1))
struct Y;
fn x1() -> X {
X(1)
}
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
Y,
X(x2),
)]
struct Z;
fn x2() -> X {
X(2)
}
// What version of X is inserted for Z?
commands.spawn(Z);
```
This is allowed (and encouraged), although this doesn't appear to occur
much in practice. First: only one version of `X` is initialized and
inserted for `Z`. In the case above, I think we can all probably agree
that it makes the most sense to use the `x2` constructor for `X`,
because `Y`'s `x1` constructor exists "beneath" `Z` in the inheritance
hierarchy; `Z`'s constructor is "more specific".
The algorithm is simple and predictable:
1. Use all of the constructors (including default constructors) directly
defined in the spawned component's require list
2. In the order the requires are defined in `#[require()]`, recursively
visit the require list of each of the components in the list (this is a
depth Depth First Search). When a constructor is found, it will only be
used if one has not already been found.
From a user perspective, just think about this as the following:
1. Specifying a required component constructor for `Foo` directly on a
spawned component `Bar` will result in that constructor being used (and
overriding existing constructors lower in the inheritance tree). This is
the classic "inheritance override" behavior people expect.
2. For cases where "multiple inheritance" results in constructor
clashes, Components should be listed in "importance order". List a
component earlier in the requirement list to initialize its inheritance
tree earlier.
Required Components _does_ generally result in a model where component
values are decoupled from each other at construction time. Notably, some
existing Bundle patterns use bundle constructors to initialize multiple
components with shared state. I think (in general) moving away from this
is necessary:
1. It allows Required Components (and the Scene system more generally)
to operate according to simple rules
2. The "do arbitrary init value sharing in Bundle constructors" approach
_already_ causes data consistency problems, and those problems would be
exacerbated in the context of a Scene/UI system. For cases where shared
state is truly necessary, I think we are better served by observers /
hooks.
3. If a situation _truly_ needs shared state constructors (which should
be rare / generally discouraged), Bundles are still there if they are
needed.
## Next Steps
* **Require Construct-ed Components**: I have already implemented this
(as defined in the [Next Generation Scene / UI
Proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437). However
I've removed `Construct` support from this PR, as that has not landed
yet. Adding this back in requires relatively minimal changes to the
current impl, and can be done as part of a future Construct pr.
* **Port Built-in Bundles to Required Components**: This isn't something
we should do right away. It will require rethinking our public
interfaces, which IMO should be done holistically after the rest of Next
Generation Scene / UI lands. I think we should merge this PR first and
let people experiment _inside their own code with their own Components_
while we wait for the rest of the new scene system to land.
* **_Consider_ Automatic Required Component Removal**: We should
evaluate _if_ automatic Required Component removal should be done. Ex:
if all components that explicitly require a component are removed,
automatically remove that component. This issue has been explicitly
deferred in this PR, as I consider the insertion behavior to be
desirable on its own (and viable on its own). I am also doubtful that we
can find a design that has behavior we actually want. Aka: can we
_really_ distinguish between a component that is "only there because it
was automatically inserted" and "a component that was necessary / should
be kept". See my [discussion response
here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437#discussioncomment-10268668)
for more details.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pascal Hertleif <killercup@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#14348
- Fixes#14528
- Less complex (but also likely less performant) alternative to #14611
## Solution
- Add a `is_dense` field flag to `QueryIter` indicating whether it is
dense or not, that is whether it can perform dense iteration or not;
- Check this flag any time iteration over a query is performed.
---
It would be nice if someone could try benching this change to see if it
actually matters.
~Note that this not 100% ready for mergin, since there are a bunch of
safety comments on the use of the various `IS_DENSE` for checks that
still need to be updated.~ This is ready modulo benchmarks
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Allow dynamic systems to take lists of system parameters whose length is
not known at compile time.
This can be used for building a system that runs a script defined at
runtime, where the script needs a variable number of query parameters.
It can also be used for building a system that collects a list of
plugins at runtime, and provides a parameter to each one.
This is most useful today with `Vec<Query<FilteredEntityMut>>`. It will
be even more useful with `Vec<DynSystemParam>` if #14817 is merged,
since the parameters in the list can then be of different types.
## Solution
Implement `SystemParam` and `SystemParamBuilder` for `Vec` and
`ParamSet<Vec>`.
## Example
```rust
let system = (vec![
QueryParamBuilder::new_box(|builder| {
builder.with::<B>().without::<C>();
}),
QueryParamBuilder::new_box(|builder| {
builder.with::<C>().without::<B>();
}),
],)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(|params: Vec<Query<&mut A>>| {
let mut count: usize = 0;
params
.into_iter()
.for_each(|mut query| count += query.iter_mut().count());
count
});
```
# Objective
- I needed to run a system whenever a specific condition became true
after being previously false.
- Other users might also need to run a system when a condition changes,
regardless of if it became true or false.
## Solution
- This adds two systems to common_conditions:
- `condition_changed` that changes whenever the inner condition changes
- `condition_became_true` that returns true whenever the inner condition
becomes true after previously being false
## Testing
- I added a doctest for each function
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
# Objective
Fixes#14883
## Solution
Pretty simple update to `EntityCommands` methods to consume `self` and
return it rather than taking `&mut self`. The things probably worth
noting:
* I added `#[allow(clippy::should_implement_trait)]` to the `add` method
because it causes a linting conflict with `std::ops::Add`.
* `despawn` and `log_components` now return `Self`. I'm not sure if
that's exactly the desired behavior so I'm happy to adjust if that seems
wrong.
## Testing
Tested with `cargo run -p ci`. I think that should be sufficient to call
things good.
## Migration Guide
The most likely migration needed is changing code from this:
```
let mut entity = commands.get_or_spawn(entity);
if depth_prepass {
entity.insert(DepthPrepass);
}
if normal_prepass {
entity.insert(NormalPrepass);
}
if motion_vector_prepass {
entity.insert(MotionVectorPrepass);
}
if deferred_prepass {
entity.insert(DeferredPrepass);
}
```
to this:
```
let mut entity = commands.get_or_spawn(entity);
if depth_prepass {
entity = entity.insert(DepthPrepass);
}
if normal_prepass {
entity = entity.insert(NormalPrepass);
}
if motion_vector_prepass {
entity = entity.insert(MotionVectorPrepass);
}
if deferred_prepass {
entity.insert(DeferredPrepass);
}
```
as can be seen in several of the example code updates here. There will
probably also be instances where mutable `EntityCommands` vars no longer
need to be mutable.
# Objective
I tried writing something like this in my project
```rust
.observe(|e: Trigger<OnAdd, Skeleton>| {
panic!("Skeletoned! {e:?}");
});
```
and it didn't compile.
Having `Debug` trait defined on `Trigger` event will ease debugging the
observers a little bit.
## Solution
Add a bespoke `Debug` implementation when both the bundle and the event
have `Debug` implemented for them.
## Testing
I've added `println!("{trigger:#?}");` to the [observers
example](938d810766/examples/ecs/observers.rs (L124))
and it compiled!
Caveats with this PR are:
- removing this implementation if for any reason we will need it, will
be a breaking change
- the implementation is manually generated, which adds potential toil
when changing the `Trigger` structure
## Showcase
Log output:
```rust
on_add_mine: Trigger {
event: OnAdd,
propagate: false,
trigger: ObserverTrigger {
observer: 2v1#4294967298,
event_type: ComponentId(
0,
),
entity: 454v1#4294967750,
},
_marker: PhantomData<observers::Mine>,
}
```
Thank you for maintaining this engine! 🧡
# Objective
Support building systems with parameters whose types can be determined
at runtime.
## Solution
Create a `DynSystemParam` type that can be built using a
`SystemParamBuilder` of any type and then downcast to the appropriate
type dynamically.
## Example
```rust
let system = (
DynParamBuilder::new(LocalBuilder(3_usize)),
DynParamBuilder:🆕:<Query<()>>(QueryParamBuilder::new(|builder| {
builder.with::<A>();
})),
DynParamBuilder:🆕:<&Entities>(ParamBuilder),
)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(
|mut p0: DynSystemParam, mut p1: DynSystemParam, mut p2: DynSystemParam| {
let local = p0.downcast_mut::<Local<usize>>().unwrap();
let query_count = p1.downcast_mut::<Query<()>>().unwrap();
let entities = p2.downcast_mut::<&Entities>().unwrap();
},
);
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Periwink <charlesbour@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#14658.
## Solution
- Added `on_unimplemented` Diagnostic for `IntoObserverSystem` calling
out argument ordering in a `note`
- Added an example to the documentation on `App::observe` to provide
some explanation to users.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
- Deliberately introduced a parameter order error in the
`ecs/observers.rs` example as a test.
---
## Showcase
<details>
<summary>Error Before</summary>
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}: IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>` is not satisfied
--> examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13
|
18 | .observe(
| ------- required by a bound introduced by this call
19 | / |mines: Query<&Mine>,
20 | | trigger: Trigger<ExplodeMines>,
21 | | index: Res<SpatialIndex>,
22 | | mut commands: Commands| {
... |
34 | | }
35 | | },
| |_____________^ the trait `bevy::prelude::IntoSystem<bevy::prelude::Trigger<'static, _, _>, (), _>` is not implemented for closure `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}`, which is required by `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}: IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
|
= note: required for `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}` to implement `IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::observe`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:995:24
|
993 | pub fn observe<E: Event, B: Bundle, M>(
| ------- required by a bound in this associated function
994 | &mut self,
995 | observer: impl IntoObserverSystem<E, B, M>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::observe`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `bevy` (example "observers") due to 1 previous error
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error After</summary>
```
error[E0277]: `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}` cannot become an `ObserverSystem`
--> examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13
|
18 | .observe(
| ------- required by a bound introduced by this call
19 | / |mines: Query<&Mine>,
20 | | trigger: Trigger<ExplodeMines>,
21 | | index: Res<SpatialIndex>,
22 | | mut commands: Commands| {
... |
34 | | }
35 | | },
| |_____________^ the trait `IntoObserverSystem` is not implemented
|
= help: the trait `bevy::prelude::IntoSystem<bevy::prelude::Trigger<'static, _, _>, (), _>` is not implemented for closure `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}`, which is required by `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}: IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
= note: for function `ObserverSystem`s, ensure the first argument is a `Trigger<T>` and any subsequent ones are `SystemParam`
= note: required for `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}` to implement `IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::observe`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:1025:24
|
1023 | pub fn observe<E: Event, B: Bundle, M>(
| ------- required by a bound in this associated function
1024 | &mut self,
1025 | observer: impl IntoObserverSystem<E, B, M>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::observe`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `bevy` (example "observers") due to 1 previous error
```
</details>
# Objective
`ParamSetBuilder` is supposed to be used as a tuple constructor, but the
field was not marked `pub` so it's not actually usable outside of its
module.
## Solution
Mark the field `pub`.
Realize one advantage of doc tests over unit tests is that they test the
public API.
Add a doc test example that uses the field so that this would have been
caught.
Closes#14836.
`filter_map_unchanged` optionally maps to an inner value by applying a
function to the contained reference. This is useful in a situation where
you need to convert a `Mut<T>` to a `Mut<U>`, but only if `T` contains
`U`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Fixes#14782
## Solution
Enable the lint and fix all upcoming hints (`--fix`). Also tried to
figure out the false-positive (see review comment). Maybe split this PR
up into multiple parts where only the last one enables the lint, so some
can already be merged resulting in less many files touched / less
potential for merge conflicts?
Currently, there are some cases where it might be easier to read the
code with the qualifier, so perhaps remove the import of it and adapt
its cases? In the current stage it's just a plain adoption of the
suggestions in order to have a base to discuss.
## Testing
`cargo clippy` and `cargo run -p ci` are happy.
# Objective
When reading the ECS code it is sometimes confusing to understand why we
have 2 accesses, one of ComponentId and one of ArchetypeComponentId
## Solution
Make the usage of these 2 accesses more explicit
---------
Co-authored-by: Pascal Hertleif <killercup@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes Commands not being `Send` or `Sync` anymore in 0.14 by
implementing `Send` and `Sync` for `RawCommandQueue`.
## Solution
Reference discussion in
[discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/691052431974465548/1259464518539411570).
It seems that in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/13249, when
adding a `RawCommandQueue` variant to the `InternalQueue`, the `Send /
Sync` traits were not implemented for it, which bubbled up all the way
to `Commands` not being `Send / Sync` anymore.
I am not very familiar with the ECS internals so I can't say whether the
`RawCommandQueue` is safe to be shared between threads, but I know for
sure that before the linked PR `Commands` were indeed `Send` and `Sync`
so that PR broke "some workflows" (mandatory
[xkcd](https://xkcd.com/1172/)).
## Testing
This PR itself includes a compile test to make sure `Commands` will
implement `Send` and `Sync`. The test itself fails without the
implementation and succeeds with it.
Furthermore, if I cherry pick the test to a previous release (i.e. 0.13)
it indeed succeeds, showing that this is a regression specific to 0.14.
---------
Signed-off-by: Luca Della Vedova <lucadv@intrinsic.ai>
# Objective
Fix#14771 by adding a `try_insert_if_new` method to the
`EntityCommands`
## Solution
This simply calls the `try_insert` function with `InsertMode::Keep`
## Testing
I did not add any test because `EntityCommands::try_insert` does not
seem to be tested either. I can add some if needed.
# Objective
Often there are reasons to insert some components (e.g. Transform)
separately from the rest of a bundle (e.g. PbrBundle). However `insert`
overwrites existing components, making this difficult.
See also issue #14397Fixes#2054.
## Solution
This PR adds the method `insert_if_new` to EntityMut and Commands, which
is the same as `insert` except that the old component is kept in case of
conflicts.
It also renames some internal enums (from `ComponentStatus::Mutated` to
`Existing`), to reflect the possible change in meaning.
## Testing
*Did you test these changes? If so, how?*
Added basic unit tests; used the new behavior in my project.
*Are there any parts that need more testing?*
There should be a test that the change time isn't set if a component is
not overwritten; I wasn't sure how to write a test for that case.
*How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?*
`cargo test` in the bevy_ecs project.
*If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?*
Only tested on Windows, but it doesn't touch anything platform-specific.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giacomo Stevanato <giaco.stevanato@gmail.com>
