bevy/examples/3d/split_screen.rs

218 lines
7 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
//! Renders two cameras to the same window to accomplish "split screen".
use std::f32::consts::PI;
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
use bevy::{
pbr::CascadeShadowConfigBuilder, prelude::*, render::camera::Viewport, window::WindowResized,
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
};
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.add_systems(Startup, setup)
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
.add_systems(Update, (set_camera_viewports, button_system))
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
.run();
}
/// set up a simple 3D scene
fn setup(
mut commands: Commands,
asset_server: Res<AssetServer>,
mut meshes: ResMut<Assets<Mesh>>,
mut materials: ResMut<Assets<StandardMaterial>>,
) {
// plane
Migrate meshes and materials to required components (#15524) # Objective A big step in the migration to required components: meshes and materials! ## Solution As per the [selected proposal](https://hackmd.io/@bevy/required_components/%2Fj9-PnF-2QKK0on1KQ29UWQ): - Deprecate `MaterialMesh2dBundle`, `MaterialMeshBundle`, and `PbrBundle`. - Add `Mesh2d` and `Mesh3d` components, which wrap a `Handle<Mesh>`. - Add `MeshMaterial2d<M: Material2d>` and `MeshMaterial3d<M: Material>`, which wrap a `Handle<M>`. - Meshes *without* a mesh material should be rendered with a default material. The existence of a material is determined by `HasMaterial2d`/`HasMaterial3d`, which is required by `MeshMaterial2d`/`MeshMaterial3d`. This gets around problems with the generics. Previously: ```rust commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0)).into(), material: materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5)), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); ``` Now: ```rust commands.spawn(( Mesh2d(meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0))), MeshMaterial2d(materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5))), Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), )); ``` If the mesh material is missing, previously nothing was rendered. Now, it renders a white default `ColorMaterial` in 2D and a `StandardMaterial` in 3D (this can be overridden). Below, only every other entity has a material: ![Näyttökuva 2024-09-29 181746](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5c8be029-d2fe-4b8c-ae89-17a72ff82c9a) ![Näyttökuva 2024-09-29 181918](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58adbc55-5a1e-4c7d-a2c7-ed456227b909) Why white? This is still open for discussion, but I think white makes sense for a *default* material, while *invalid* asset handles pointing to nothing should have something like a pink material to indicate that something is broken (I don't handle that in this PR yet). This is kind of a mix of Godot and Unity: Godot just renders a white material for non-existent materials, while Unity renders nothing when no materials exist, but renders pink for invalid materials. I can also change the default material to pink if that is preferable though. ## Testing I ran some 2D and 3D examples to test if anything changed visually. I have not tested all examples or features yet however. If anyone wants to test more extensively, it would be appreciated! ## Implementation Notes - The relationship between `bevy_render` and `bevy_pbr` is weird here. `bevy_render` needs `Mesh3d` for its own systems, but `bevy_pbr` has all of the material logic, and `bevy_render` doesn't depend on it. I feel like the two crates should be refactored in some way, but I think that's out of scope for this PR. - I didn't migrate meshlets to required components yet. That can probably be done in a follow-up, as this is already a huge PR. - It is becoming increasingly clear to me that we really, *really* want to disallow raw asset handles as components. They caused me a *ton* of headache here already, and it took me a long time to find every place that queried for them or inserted them directly on entities, since there were no compiler errors for it. If we don't remove the `Component` derive, I expect raw asset handles to be a *huge* footgun for users as we transition to wrapper components, especially as handles as components have been the norm so far. I personally consider this to be a blocker for 0.15: we need to migrate to wrapper components for asset handles everywhere, and remove the `Component` derive. Also see https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14124. --- ## Migration Guide Asset handles for meshes and mesh materials must now be wrapped in the `Mesh2d` and `MeshMaterial2d` or `Mesh3d` and `MeshMaterial3d` components for 2D and 3D respectively. Raw handles as components no longer render meshes. Additionally, `MaterialMesh2dBundle`, `MaterialMeshBundle`, and `PbrBundle` have been deprecated. Instead, use the mesh and material components directly. Previously: ```rust commands.spawn(MaterialMesh2dBundle { mesh: meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0)).into(), material: materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5)), transform: Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), ..default() }); ``` Now: ```rust commands.spawn(( Mesh2d(meshes.add(Circle::new(100.0))), MeshMaterial2d(materials.add(Color::srgb(7.5, 0.0, 7.5))), Transform::from_translation(Vec3::new(-200., 0., 0.)), )); ``` If the mesh material is missing, a white default material is now used. Previously, nothing was rendered if the material was missing. The `WithMesh2d` and `WithMesh3d` query filter type aliases have also been removed. Simply use `With<Mesh2d>` or `With<Mesh3d>`. --------- Co-authored-by: Tim Blackbird <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2024-10-01 21:33:17 +00:00
commands.spawn((
Mesh3d(meshes.add(Plane3d::default().mesh().size(100.0, 100.0))),
MeshMaterial3d(materials.add(Color::srgb(0.3, 0.5, 0.3))),
));
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
commands.spawn(SceneRoot(
asset_server.load(GltfAssetLabel::Scene(0).from_asset("models/animated/Fox.glb")),
));
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
// Light
commands.spawn((
Transform::from_rotation(Quat::from_euler(EulerRot::ZYX, 0.0, 1.0, -PI / 4.)),
DirectionalLight {
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
shadows_enabled: true,
..default()
},
CascadeShadowConfigBuilder {
num_cascades: if cfg!(all(
feature = "webgl2",
target_arch = "wasm32",
not(feature = "webgpu")
)) {
// Limited to 1 cascade in WebGL
1
} else {
2
},
first_cascade_far_bound: 200.0,
maximum_distance: 280.0,
..default()
}
.build(),
));
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
// Cameras and their dedicated UI
for (index, (camera_name, camera_pos)) in [
("Player 1", Vec3::new(0.0, 200.0, -150.0)),
("Player 2", Vec3::new(150.0, 150., 50.0)),
("Player 3", Vec3::new(100.0, 150., -150.0)),
("Player 4", Vec3::new(-100.0, 80., 150.0)),
]
.iter()
.enumerate()
{
let camera = commands
.spawn((
Camera3dBundle {
transform: Transform::from_translation(*camera_pos)
.looking_at(Vec3::ZERO, Vec3::Y),
camera: Camera {
// Renders cameras with different priorities to prevent ambiguities
order: index as isize,
..default()
},
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
..default()
},
CameraPosition {
pos: UVec2::new((index % 2) as u32, (index / 2) as u32),
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
},
))
.id();
// Set up UI
commands
.spawn((
TargetCamera(camera),
NodeBundle {
style: Style {
width: Val::Percent(100.),
height: Val::Percent(100.),
..default()
},
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
..default()
},
))
.with_children(|parent| {
parent.spawn(
TextBundle::from_section(*camera_name, TextStyle::default()).with_style(
Style {
position_type: PositionType::Absolute,
top: Val::Px(12.),
left: Val::Px(12.),
..default()
},
),
);
buttons_panel(parent);
});
}
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
fn buttons_panel(parent: &mut ChildBuilder) {
parent
.spawn(NodeBundle {
style: Style {
position_type: PositionType::Absolute,
width: Val::Percent(100.),
height: Val::Percent(100.),
display: Display::Flex,
flex_direction: FlexDirection::Row,
justify_content: JustifyContent::SpaceBetween,
align_items: AlignItems::Center,
padding: UiRect::all(Val::Px(20.)),
..default()
},
..default()
})
.with_children(|parent| {
rotate_button(parent, "<", Direction::Left);
rotate_button(parent, ">", Direction::Right);
});
}
fn rotate_button(parent: &mut ChildBuilder, caption: &str, direction: Direction) {
parent
.spawn((
RotateCamera(direction),
ButtonBundle {
style: Style {
width: Val::Px(40.),
height: Val::Px(40.),
border: UiRect::all(Val::Px(2.)),
justify_content: JustifyContent::Center,
align_items: AlignItems::Center,
..default()
},
Migrate from `LegacyColor` to `bevy_color::Color` (#12163) # Objective - As part of the migration process we need to a) see the end effect of the migration on user ergonomics b) check for serious perf regressions c) actually migrate the code - To accomplish this, I'm going to attempt to migrate all of the remaining user-facing usages of `LegacyColor` in one PR, being careful to keep a clean commit history. - Fixes #12056. ## Solution I've chosen to use the polymorphic `Color` type as our standard user-facing API. - [x] Migrate `bevy_gizmos`. - [x] Take `impl Into<Color>` in all `bevy_gizmos` APIs - [x] Migrate sprites - [x] Migrate UI - [x] Migrate `ColorMaterial` - [x] Migrate `MaterialMesh2D` - [x] Migrate fog - [x] Migrate lights - [x] Migrate StandardMaterial - [x] Migrate wireframes - [x] Migrate clear color - [x] Migrate text - [x] Migrate gltf loader - [x] Register color types for reflection - [x] Remove `LegacyColor` - [x] Make sure CI passes Incidental improvements to ease migration: - added `Color::srgba_u8`, `Color::srgba_from_array` and friends - added `set_alpha`, `is_fully_transparent` and `is_fully_opaque` to the `Alpha` trait - add and immediately deprecate (lol) `Color::rgb` and friends in favor of more explicit and consistent `Color::srgb` - standardized on white and black for most example text colors - added vector field traits to `LinearRgba`: ~~`Add`, `Sub`, `AddAssign`, `SubAssign`,~~ `Mul<f32>` and `Div<f32>`. Multiplications and divisions do not scale alpha. `Add` and `Sub` have been cut from this PR. - added `LinearRgba` and `Srgba` `RED/GREEN/BLUE` - added `LinearRgba_to_f32_array` and `LinearRgba::to_u32` ## Migration Guide Bevy's color types have changed! Wherever you used a `bevy::render::Color`, a `bevy::color::Color` is used instead. These are quite similar! Both are enums storing a color in a specific color space (or to be more precise, using a specific color model). However, each of the different color models now has its own type. TODO... - `Color::rgba`, `Color::rgb`, `Color::rbga_u8`, `Color::rgb_u8`, `Color::rgb_from_array` are now `Color::srgba`, `Color::srgb`, `Color::srgba_u8`, `Color::srgb_u8` and `Color::srgb_from_array`. - `Color::set_a` and `Color::a` is now `Color::set_alpha` and `Color::alpha`. These are part of the `Alpha` trait in `bevy_color`. - `Color::is_fully_transparent` is now part of the `Alpha` trait in `bevy_color` - `Color::r`, `Color::set_r`, `Color::with_r` and the equivalents for `g`, `b` `h`, `s` and `l` have been removed due to causing silent relatively expensive conversions. Convert your `Color` into the desired color space, perform your operations there, and then convert it back into a polymorphic `Color` enum. - `Color::hex` is now `Srgba::hex`. Call `.into` or construct a `Color::Srgba` variant manually to convert it. - `WireframeMaterial`, `ExtractedUiNode`, `ExtractedDirectionalLight`, `ExtractedPointLight`, `ExtractedSpotLight` and `ExtractedSprite` now store a `LinearRgba`, rather than a polymorphic `Color` - `Color::rgb_linear` and `Color::rgba_linear` are now `Color::linear_rgb` and `Color::linear_rgba` - The various CSS color constants are no longer stored directly on `Color`. Instead, they're defined in the `Srgba` color space, and accessed via `bevy::color::palettes::css`. Call `.into()` on them to convert them into a `Color` for quick debugging use, and consider using the much prettier `tailwind` palette for prototyping. - The `LIME_GREEN` color has been renamed to `LIMEGREEN` to comply with the standard naming. - Vector field arithmetic operations on `Color` (add, subtract, multiply and divide by a f32) have been removed. Instead, convert your colors into `LinearRgba` space, and perform your operations explicitly there. This is particularly relevant when working with emissive or HDR colors, whose color channel values are routinely outside of the ordinary 0 to 1 range. - `Color::as_linear_rgba_f32` has been removed. Call `LinearRgba::to_f32_array` instead, converting if needed. - `Color::as_linear_rgba_u32` has been removed. Call `LinearRgba::to_u32` instead, converting if needed. - Several other color conversion methods to transform LCH or HSL colors into float arrays or `Vec` types have been removed. Please reimplement these externally or open a PR to re-add them if you found them particularly useful. - Various methods on `Color` such as `rgb` or `hsl` to convert the color into a specific color space have been removed. Convert into `LinearRgba`, then to the color space of your choice. - Various implicitly-converting color value methods on `Color` such as `r`, `g`, `b` or `h` have been removed. Please convert it into the color space of your choice, then check these properties. - `Color` no longer implements `AsBindGroup`. Store a `LinearRgba` internally instead to avoid conversion costs. --------- Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Afonso Lage <lage.afonso@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
2024-02-29 19:35:12 +00:00
border_color: Color::WHITE.into(),
Make default behavior for `BackgroundColor` and `BorderColor` more intuitive (#14017) # Objective In Bevy 0.13, `BackgroundColor` simply tinted the image of any `UiImage`. This was confusing: in every other case (e.g. Text), this added a solid square behind the element. #11165 changed this, but removed `BackgroundColor` from `ImageBundle` to avoid confusion, since the semantic meaning had changed. However, this resulted in a serious UX downgrade / inconsistency, as this behavior was no longer part of the bundle (unlike for `TextBundle` or `NodeBundle`), leaving users with a relatively frustrating upgrade path. Additionally, adding both `BackgroundColor` and `UiImage` resulted in a bizarre effect, where the background color was seemingly ignored as it was covered by a solid white placeholder image. Fixes #13969. ## Solution Per @viridia's design: > - if you don't specify a background color, it's transparent. > - if you don't specify an image color, it's white (because it's a multiplier). > - if you don't specify an image, no image is drawn. > - if you specify both a background color and an image color, they are independent. > - the background color is drawn behind the image (in whatever pixels are transparent) As laid out by @benfrankel, this involves: 1. Changing the default `UiImage` to use a transparent texture but a pure white tint. 2. Adding `UiImage::solid_color` to quickly set placeholder images. 3. Changing the default `BorderColor` and `BackgroundColor` to transparent. 4. Removing the default overrides for these values in the other assorted UI bundles. 5. Adding `BackgroundColor` back to `ImageBundle` and `ButtonBundle`. 6. Adding a 1x1 `Image::transparent`, which can be accessed from `Assets<Image>` via the `TRANSPARENT_IMAGE_HANDLE` constant. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out with the design in the linked issue and [the Discord thread](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1255209923890118697/1255209999278280844): this was very much a joint design. @cart helped me figure out how to set the UiImage's default texture to a transparent 1x1 image, which is a much nicer fix. ## Testing I've checked the examples modified by this PR, and the `ui` example as well just to be sure. ## Migration Guide - `BackgroundColor` no longer tints the color of images in `ImageBundle` or `ButtonBundle`. Set `UiImage::color` to tint images instead. - The default texture for `UiImage` is now a transparent white square. Use `UiImage::solid_color` to quickly draw debug images. - The default value for `BackgroundColor` and `BorderColor` is now transparent. Set the color to white manually to return to previous behavior.
2024-06-25 21:50:41 +00:00
background_color: Color::srgb(0.25, 0.25, 0.25).into(),
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
..default()
},
))
.with_children(|parent| {
parent.spawn(TextBundle::from_section(caption, TextStyle::default()));
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
});
}
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
}
#[derive(Component)]
struct CameraPosition {
pos: UVec2,
}
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
#[derive(Component)]
struct RotateCamera(Direction);
enum Direction {
Left,
Right,
}
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
fn set_camera_viewports(
Windows as Entities (#5589) # Objective Fix https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4530 - Make it easier to open/close/modify windows by setting them up as `Entity`s with a `Window` component. - Make multiple windows very simple to set up. (just add a `Window` component to an entity and it should open) ## Solution - Move all properties of window descriptor to ~components~ a component. - Replace `WindowId` with `Entity`. - ~Use change detection for components to update backend rather than events/commands. (The `CursorMoved`/`WindowResized`/... events are kept for user convenience.~ Check each field individually to see what we need to update, events are still kept for user convenience. --- ## Changelog - `WindowDescriptor` renamed to `Window`. - Width/height consolidated into a `WindowResolution` component. - Requesting maximization/minimization is done on the [`Window::state`] field. - `WindowId` is now `Entity`. ## Migration Guide - Replace `WindowDescriptor` with `Window`. - Change `width` and `height` fields in a `WindowResolution`, either by doing ```rust WindowResolution::new(width, height) // Explicitly // or using From<_> for tuples for convenience (1920., 1080.).into() ``` - Replace any `WindowCommand` code to just modify the `Window`'s fields directly and creating/closing windows is now by spawning/despawning an entity with a `Window` component like so: ```rust let window = commands.spawn(Window { ... }).id(); // open window commands.entity(window).despawn(); // close window ``` ## Unresolved - ~How do we tell when a window is minimized by a user?~ ~Currently using the `Resize(0, 0)` as an indicator of minimization.~ No longer attempting to tell given how finnicky this was across platforms, now the user can only request that a window be maximized/minimized. ## Future work - Move `exit_on_close` functionality out from windowing and into app(?) - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5621 - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7099 - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7098 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-01-19 00:38:28 +00:00
windows: Query<&Window>,
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
mut resize_events: EventReader<WindowResized>,
mut query: Query<(&CameraPosition, &mut Camera)>,
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
) {
// We need to dynamically resize the camera's viewports whenever the window size changes
// so then each camera always takes up half the screen.
// A resize_event is sent when the window is first created, allowing us to reuse this system for initial setup.
for resize_event in resize_events.read() {
Windows as Entities (#5589) # Objective Fix https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4530 - Make it easier to open/close/modify windows by setting them up as `Entity`s with a `Window` component. - Make multiple windows very simple to set up. (just add a `Window` component to an entity and it should open) ## Solution - Move all properties of window descriptor to ~components~ a component. - Replace `WindowId` with `Entity`. - ~Use change detection for components to update backend rather than events/commands. (The `CursorMoved`/`WindowResized`/... events are kept for user convenience.~ Check each field individually to see what we need to update, events are still kept for user convenience. --- ## Changelog - `WindowDescriptor` renamed to `Window`. - Width/height consolidated into a `WindowResolution` component. - Requesting maximization/minimization is done on the [`Window::state`] field. - `WindowId` is now `Entity`. ## Migration Guide - Replace `WindowDescriptor` with `Window`. - Change `width` and `height` fields in a `WindowResolution`, either by doing ```rust WindowResolution::new(width, height) // Explicitly // or using From<_> for tuples for convenience (1920., 1080.).into() ``` - Replace any `WindowCommand` code to just modify the `Window`'s fields directly and creating/closing windows is now by spawning/despawning an entity with a `Window` component like so: ```rust let window = commands.spawn(Window { ... }).id(); // open window commands.entity(window).despawn(); // close window ``` ## Unresolved - ~How do we tell when a window is minimized by a user?~ ~Currently using the `Resize(0, 0)` as an indicator of minimization.~ No longer attempting to tell given how finnicky this was across platforms, now the user can only request that a window be maximized/minimized. ## Future work - Move `exit_on_close` functionality out from windowing and into app(?) - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5621 - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7099 - https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7098 Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-01-19 00:38:28 +00:00
let window = windows.get(resize_event.window).unwrap();
let size = window.physical_size() / 2;
for (camera_position, mut camera) in &mut query {
camera.viewport = Some(Viewport {
physical_position: camera_position.pos * size,
physical_size: size,
..default()
});
}
Camera Driven Viewports (#4898) # Objective Users should be able to render cameras to specific areas of a render target, which enables scenarios like split screen, minimaps, etc. Builds on the new Camera Driven Rendering added here: #4745 Fixes: #202 Alternative to #1389 and #3626 (which are incompatible with the new Camera Driven Rendering) ## Solution ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/171560044-f0694f67-0cd9-4598-83e2-a9658c4fed57.png) Cameras can now configure an optional "viewport", which defines a rectangle within their render target to draw to. If a `Viewport` is defined, the camera's `CameraProjection`, `View`, and visibility calculations will use the viewport configuration instead of the full render target. ```rust // This camera will render to the first half of the primary window (on the left side). commands.spawn_bundle(Camera3dBundle { camera: Camera { viewport: Some(Viewport { physical_position: UVec2::new(0, 0), physical_size: UVec2::new(window.physical_width() / 2, window.physical_height()), depth: 0.0..1.0, }), ..default() }, ..default() }); ``` To account for this, the `Camera` component has received a few adjustments: * `Camera` now has some new getter functions: * `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, `projection_matrix` * All computed camera values are now private and live on the `ComputedCameraValues` field (logical/physical width/height, the projection matrix). They are now exposed on `Camera` via getters/setters This wasn't _needed_ for viewports, but it was long overdue. --- ## Changelog ### Added * `Camera` components now have a `viewport` field, which can be set to draw to a portion of a render target instead of the full target. * `Camera` component has some new functions: `logical_viewport_size`, `physical_viewport_size`, `logical_target_size`, `physical_target_size`, and `projection_matrix` * Added a new split_screen example illustrating how to render two cameras to the same scene ## Migration Guide `Camera::projection_matrix` is no longer a public field. Use the new `Camera::projection_matrix()` method instead: ```rust // Bevy 0.7 let projection = camera.projection_matrix; // Bevy 0.8 let projection = camera.projection_matrix(); ```
2022-06-05 00:27:49 +00:00
}
}
Camera-driven UI (#10559) # Objective Add support for presenting each UI tree on a specific window and viewport, while making as few breaking changes as possible. This PR is meant to resolve the following issues at once, since they're all related. - Fixes #5622 - Fixes #5570 - Fixes #5621 Adopted #5892 , but started over since the current codebase diverged significantly from the original PR branch. Also, I made a decision to propagate component to children instead of recursively iterating over nodes in search for the root. ## Solution Add a new optional component that can be inserted to UI root nodes and propagate to children to specify which camera it should render onto. This is then used to get the render target and the viewport for that UI tree. Since this component is optional, the default behavior should be to render onto the single camera (if only one exist) and warn of ambiguity if multiple cameras exist. This reduces the complexity for users with just one camera, while giving control in contexts where it matters. ## Changelog - Adds `TargetCamera(Entity)` component to specify which camera should a node tree be rendered into. If only one camera exists, this component is optional. - Adds an example of rendering UI to a texture and using it as a material in a 3D world. - Fixes recalculation of physical viewport size when target scale factor changes. This can happen when the window is moved between displays with different DPI. - Changes examples to demonstrate assigning UI to different viewports and windows and make interactions in an offset viewport testable. - Removes `UiCameraConfig`. UI visibility now can be controlled via combination of explicit `TargetCamera` and `Visibility` on the root nodes. --------- Co-authored-by: davier <bricedavier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
2024-01-16 00:39:10 +00:00
#[allow(clippy::type_complexity)]
fn button_system(
interaction_query: Query<
(&Interaction, &TargetCamera, &RotateCamera),
(Changed<Interaction>, With<Button>),
>,
mut camera_query: Query<&mut Transform, With<Camera>>,
) {
for (interaction, target_camera, RotateCamera(direction)) in &interaction_query {
if let Interaction::Pressed = *interaction {
// Since TargetCamera propagates to the children, we can use it to find
// which side of the screen the button is on.
if let Ok(mut camera_transform) = camera_query.get_mut(target_camera.entity()) {
let angle = match direction {
Direction::Left => -0.1,
Direction::Right => 0.1,
};
camera_transform.rotate_around(Vec3::ZERO, Quat::from_axis_angle(Vec3::Y, angle));
}
}
}
}