2022-11-05 20:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
//! This module contains basic node bundles used to build UIs
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-29 00:33:35 +00:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(feature = "bevy_text")]
|
|
|
|
use crate::widget::TextFlags;
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
use crate::{
|
2023-06-29 00:33:35 +00:00
|
|
|
widget::{Button, UiImageSize},
|
2023-06-14 22:43:38 +00:00
|
|
|
BackgroundColor, BorderColor, ContentSize, FocusPolicy, Interaction, Node, Style, UiImage,
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
UiTextureAtlasImage, ZIndex,
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_asset::Handle;
|
2022-11-05 20:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_ecs::bundle::Bundle;
|
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective
Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114
Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.
Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.
## Solution
Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.
Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.
This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.
Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.
Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)
Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale.
## Follow up work
* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---
## Changelog
* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.
## Migration Guide
If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:
```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible() {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_render::{
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
prelude::Color,
|
|
|
|
view::{InheritedVisibility, ViewVisibility, Visibility},
|
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective
Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114
Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.
Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.
## Solution
Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.
Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.
This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.
Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.
Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)
Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale.
## Follow up work
* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---
## Changelog
* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.
## Migration Guide
If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:
```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible() {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_sprite::TextureAtlas;
|
2023-02-24 02:21:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(feature = "bevy_text")]
|
2023-06-26 16:23:00 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_text::{BreakLineOn, Text, TextAlignment, TextLayoutInfo, TextSection, TextStyle};
|
2020-09-14 21:00:32 +00:00
|
|
|
use bevy_transform::prelude::{GlobalTransform, Transform};
|
2020-04-06 21:20:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The basic UI node
|
2022-11-05 20:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Useful as a container for a variety of child nodes.
|
2022-10-09 21:03:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Bundle, Clone, Debug)]
|
2020-11-16 04:32:23 +00:00
|
|
|
pub struct NodeBundle {
|
2023-03-04 19:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the logical size of the node
|
2020-04-06 21:20:53 +00:00
|
|
|
pub node: Node,
|
2023-04-17 16:21:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Styles which control the layout (size and position) of the node and it's children
|
|
|
|
/// In some cases these styles also affect how the node drawn/painted.
|
2020-07-26 19:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
pub style: Style,
|
2022-09-25 00:39:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The background color, which serves as a "fill" for this node
|
|
|
|
pub background_color: BackgroundColor,
|
2023-06-14 22:43:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The color of the Node's border
|
|
|
|
pub border_color: BorderColor,
|
2022-02-15 22:31:51 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Whether this node should block interaction with lower nodes
|
|
|
|
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically managed by the UI layout system.
|
2023-04-23 17:28:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To alter the position of the `NodeBundle`, use the properties of the [`Style`] component.
|
2020-06-25 17:13:00 +00:00
|
|
|
pub transform: Transform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The global transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically updated by the [`TransformPropagate`](`bevy_transform::TransformSystem::TransformPropagate`) systems.
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To alter the position of the `NodeBundle`, use the properties of the [`Style`] component.
|
2020-09-14 21:00:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the visibility properties of the node
|
2021-12-24 07:10:12 +00:00
|
|
|
pub visibility: Visibility,
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Inherited visibility of an entity.
|
|
|
|
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
|
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective
Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114
Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.
Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.
## Solution
Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.
Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.
This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.
Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.
Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)
Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale.
## Follow up work
* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---
## Changelog
* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.
## Migration Guide
If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:
```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible() {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Algorithmically-computed indication of whether an entity is visible and should be extracted for rendering
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
|
Add z-index support with a predictable UI stack (#5877)
# Objective
Add consistent UI rendering and interaction where deep nodes inside two different hierarchies will never render on top of one-another by default and offer an escape hatch (z-index) for nodes to change their depth.
## The problem with current implementation
The current implementation of UI rendering is broken in that regard, mainly because [it sets the Z value of the `Transform` component based on a "global Z" space](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/crates/bevy_ui/src/update.rs#L43) shared by all nodes in the UI. This doesn't account for the fact that each node's final `GlobalTransform` value will be relative to its parent. This effectively makes the depth unpredictable when two deep trees are rendered on top of one-another.
At the moment, it's also up to each part of the UI code to sort all of the UI nodes. The solution that's offered here does the full sorting of UI node entities once and offers the result through a resource so that all systems can use it.
## Solution
### New ZIndex component
This adds a new optional `ZIndex` enum component for nodes which offers two mechanism:
- `ZIndex::Local(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to its siblings.
- `ZIndex::Global(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to the UI root. This basically allows any node in the tree to "escape" the parent and be ordered relative to the entire UI.
Note that in the current implementation, omitting `ZIndex` on a node has the same result as adding `ZIndex::Local(0)`. Additionally, the "global" stacking context is essentially a way to add your node to the root stacking context, so using `ZIndex::Local(n)` on a root node (one without parent) will share that space with all nodes using `Index::Global(n)`.
### New UiStack resource
This adds a new `UiStack` resource which is calculated from both hierarchy and `ZIndex` during UI update and contains a vector of all node entities in the UI, ordered by depth (from farthest from camera to closest). This is exposed publicly by the bevy_ui crate with the hope that it can be used for consistent ordering and to reduce the amount of sorting that needs to be done by UI systems (i.e. instead of sorting everything by `global_transform.z` in every system, this array can be iterated over).
### New z_index example
This also adds a new z_index example that showcases the new `ZIndex` component. It's also a good general demo of the new UI stack system, because making this kind of UI was very broken with the old system (e.g. nodes would render on top of each other, not respecting hierarchy or insert order at all).
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/189015985-8ea8f989-0e9d-4601-a7e0-4a27a43a53f9.png)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `ZIndex` component to bevy_ui.
- Added the `UiStack` resource to bevy_ui, and added implementation in a new `stack.rs` module.
- Removed the previous Z updating system from bevy_ui, because it was replaced with the above.
- Changed bevy_ui rendering to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Changed bevy_ui focus/interaction system to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Added a new z_index example.
## ZIndex demo
Here's a demo I wrote to test these features
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/188329295-d7beebd6-9aee-43ab-821e-d437df5dbe8a.mp4
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 22:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Indicates the depth at which the node should appear in the UI
|
|
|
|
pub z_index: ZIndex,
|
2020-04-06 21:20:53 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-05-03 19:35:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-09 21:03:05 +00:00
|
|
|
impl Default for NodeBundle {
|
|
|
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
|
|
|
NodeBundle {
|
|
|
|
// Transparent background
|
|
|
|
background_color: Color::NONE.into(),
|
2023-06-14 22:43:38 +00:00
|
|
|
border_color: Color::NONE.into(),
|
2022-10-09 21:03:05 +00:00
|
|
|
node: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
style: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
focus_policy: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
transform: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
global_transform: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
visibility: Default::default(),
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
inherited_visibility: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
view_visibility: Default::default(),
|
Add z-index support with a predictable UI stack (#5877)
# Objective
Add consistent UI rendering and interaction where deep nodes inside two different hierarchies will never render on top of one-another by default and offer an escape hatch (z-index) for nodes to change their depth.
## The problem with current implementation
The current implementation of UI rendering is broken in that regard, mainly because [it sets the Z value of the `Transform` component based on a "global Z" space](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/crates/bevy_ui/src/update.rs#L43) shared by all nodes in the UI. This doesn't account for the fact that each node's final `GlobalTransform` value will be relative to its parent. This effectively makes the depth unpredictable when two deep trees are rendered on top of one-another.
At the moment, it's also up to each part of the UI code to sort all of the UI nodes. The solution that's offered here does the full sorting of UI node entities once and offers the result through a resource so that all systems can use it.
## Solution
### New ZIndex component
This adds a new optional `ZIndex` enum component for nodes which offers two mechanism:
- `ZIndex::Local(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to its siblings.
- `ZIndex::Global(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to the UI root. This basically allows any node in the tree to "escape" the parent and be ordered relative to the entire UI.
Note that in the current implementation, omitting `ZIndex` on a node has the same result as adding `ZIndex::Local(0)`. Additionally, the "global" stacking context is essentially a way to add your node to the root stacking context, so using `ZIndex::Local(n)` on a root node (one without parent) will share that space with all nodes using `Index::Global(n)`.
### New UiStack resource
This adds a new `UiStack` resource which is calculated from both hierarchy and `ZIndex` during UI update and contains a vector of all node entities in the UI, ordered by depth (from farthest from camera to closest). This is exposed publicly by the bevy_ui crate with the hope that it can be used for consistent ordering and to reduce the amount of sorting that needs to be done by UI systems (i.e. instead of sorting everything by `global_transform.z` in every system, this array can be iterated over).
### New z_index example
This also adds a new z_index example that showcases the new `ZIndex` component. It's also a good general demo of the new UI stack system, because making this kind of UI was very broken with the old system (e.g. nodes would render on top of each other, not respecting hierarchy or insert order at all).
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/189015985-8ea8f989-0e9d-4601-a7e0-4a27a43a53f9.png)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `ZIndex` component to bevy_ui.
- Added the `UiStack` resource to bevy_ui, and added implementation in a new `stack.rs` module.
- Removed the previous Z updating system from bevy_ui, because it was replaced with the above.
- Changed bevy_ui rendering to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Changed bevy_ui focus/interaction system to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Added a new z_index example.
## ZIndex demo
Here's a demo I wrote to test these features
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/188329295-d7beebd6-9aee-43ab-821e-d437df5dbe8a.mp4
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 22:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
z_index: Default::default(),
|
2022-10-09 21:03:05 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// A UI node that is an image
|
2023-05-01 15:40:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Bundle, Debug, Default)]
|
2020-11-16 04:32:23 +00:00
|
|
|
pub struct ImageBundle {
|
2023-03-04 19:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the logical size of the node
|
2020-07-28 07:37:25 +00:00
|
|
|
pub node: Node,
|
2023-04-17 16:21:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Styles which control the layout (size and position) of the node and it's children
|
|
|
|
/// In some cases these styles also affect how the node drawn/painted.
|
2020-07-28 07:37:25 +00:00
|
|
|
pub style: Style,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The calculated size based on the given image
|
2023-05-01 15:40:53 +00:00
|
|
|
pub calculated_size: ContentSize,
|
2022-09-25 00:39:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The background color, which serves as a "fill" for this node
|
|
|
|
///
|
2022-12-20 16:17:14 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Combines with `UiImage` to tint the provided image.
|
2022-09-25 00:39:17 +00:00
|
|
|
pub background_color: BackgroundColor,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The image of the node
|
2021-12-14 03:58:23 +00:00
|
|
|
pub image: UiImage,
|
`text_system` split (#7779)
# Objective
`text_system` runs before the UI layout is calculated and the size of
the text node is determined, so it cannot correctly shape the text to
fit the layout, and has no way of determining if the text needs to be
wrapped.
The function `text_constraint` attempts to determine the size of the
node from the local size constraints in the `Style` component. It can't
be made to work, you have to compute the whole layout to get the correct
size. A simple example of where this fails completely is a text node set
to stretch to fill the empty space adjacent to a node with size
constraints set to `Val::Percent(50.)`. The text node will take up half
the space, even though its size constraints are `Val::Auto`
Also because the `text_system` queries for changes to the `Style`
component, when a style value is changed that doesn't affect the node's
geometry the text is recomputed unnecessarily.
Querying on changes to `Node` is not much better. The UI layout is
changed to fit the `CalculatedSize` of the text, so the size of the node
is changed and so the text and UI layout get recalculated multiple times
from a single change to a `Text`.
Also, the `MeasureFunc` doesn't work at all, it doesn't have enough
information to fit the text correctly and makes no attempt.
Fixes #7663, #6717, #5834, #1490,
## Solution
Split the `text_system` into two functions:
* `measure_text_system` which calculates the size constraints for the
text node and runs before `UiSystem::Flex`
* `text_system` which runs after `UiSystem::Flex` and generates the
actual text.
* Fix the `MeasureFunc` calculations.
---
Text wrapping in main:
<img width="961" alt="Capturemain"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425740-4fe4bf46-24fb-4685-a1cf-bc01e139e72d.PNG">
With this PR:
<img width="961" alt="captured_wrap"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425807-949996b0-f127-4637-9f33-56a6da944fb0.PNG">
## Changelog
* Removed the previous fields from `CalculatedSize`. `CalculatedSize`
now contains a boxed `Measure`.
* Added `measurement` module to `bevy_ui`.
* Added the method `create_text_measure` to `TextPipeline`.
* Added a new system `measure_text_system` that runs before
`UiSystem::Flex` that creates a `MeasureFunc` for the text.
* Rescheduled `text_system` to run after `UiSystem::Flex`.
* Added a trait `Measure`. A `Measure` is used to compute the size of a
UI node when the size of that node is based on its content.
* Added `ImageMeasure` and `TextMeasure` which implement `Measure`.
* Added a new component `UiImageSize` which is used by
`update_image_calculated_size_system` to track image size changes.
* Added a `UiImageSize` component to `ImageBundle`.
## Migration Guide
`ImageBundle` has a new component `UiImageSize` which contains the size
of the image bundle's texture and is updated automatically by
`update_image_calculated_size_system`
---------
Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-04-17 15:23:21 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The size of the image in pixels
|
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is set automatically
|
`text_system` split (#7779)
# Objective
`text_system` runs before the UI layout is calculated and the size of
the text node is determined, so it cannot correctly shape the text to
fit the layout, and has no way of determining if the text needs to be
wrapped.
The function `text_constraint` attempts to determine the size of the
node from the local size constraints in the `Style` component. It can't
be made to work, you have to compute the whole layout to get the correct
size. A simple example of where this fails completely is a text node set
to stretch to fill the empty space adjacent to a node with size
constraints set to `Val::Percent(50.)`. The text node will take up half
the space, even though its size constraints are `Val::Auto`
Also because the `text_system` queries for changes to the `Style`
component, when a style value is changed that doesn't affect the node's
geometry the text is recomputed unnecessarily.
Querying on changes to `Node` is not much better. The UI layout is
changed to fit the `CalculatedSize` of the text, so the size of the node
is changed and so the text and UI layout get recalculated multiple times
from a single change to a `Text`.
Also, the `MeasureFunc` doesn't work at all, it doesn't have enough
information to fit the text correctly and makes no attempt.
Fixes #7663, #6717, #5834, #1490,
## Solution
Split the `text_system` into two functions:
* `measure_text_system` which calculates the size constraints for the
text node and runs before `UiSystem::Flex`
* `text_system` which runs after `UiSystem::Flex` and generates the
actual text.
* Fix the `MeasureFunc` calculations.
---
Text wrapping in main:
<img width="961" alt="Capturemain"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425740-4fe4bf46-24fb-4685-a1cf-bc01e139e72d.PNG">
With this PR:
<img width="961" alt="captured_wrap"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425807-949996b0-f127-4637-9f33-56a6da944fb0.PNG">
## Changelog
* Removed the previous fields from `CalculatedSize`. `CalculatedSize`
now contains a boxed `Measure`.
* Added `measurement` module to `bevy_ui`.
* Added the method `create_text_measure` to `TextPipeline`.
* Added a new system `measure_text_system` that runs before
`UiSystem::Flex` that creates a `MeasureFunc` for the text.
* Rescheduled `text_system` to run after `UiSystem::Flex`.
* Added a trait `Measure`. A `Measure` is used to compute the size of a
UI node when the size of that node is based on its content.
* Added `ImageMeasure` and `TextMeasure` which implement `Measure`.
* Added a new component `UiImageSize` which is used by
`update_image_calculated_size_system` to track image size changes.
* Added a `UiImageSize` component to `ImageBundle`.
## Migration Guide
`ImageBundle` has a new component `UiImageSize` which contains the size
of the image bundle's texture and is updated automatically by
`update_image_calculated_size_system`
---------
Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-04-17 15:23:21 +00:00
|
|
|
pub image_size: UiImageSize,
|
2022-02-15 22:31:51 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Whether this node should block interaction with lower nodes
|
|
|
|
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically managed by the UI layout system.
|
2023-08-21 01:39:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To alter the position of the `ImageBundle`, use the properties of the [`Style`] component.
|
2020-07-28 07:37:25 +00:00
|
|
|
pub transform: Transform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The global transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically updated by the [`TransformPropagate`](`bevy_transform::TransformSystem::TransformPropagate`) systems.
|
2020-09-14 21:00:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the visibility properties of the node
|
2021-12-24 07:10:12 +00:00
|
|
|
pub visibility: Visibility,
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Inherited visibility of an entity.
|
|
|
|
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
|
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective
Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114
Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.
Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.
## Solution
Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.
Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.
This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.
Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.
Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)
Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale.
## Follow up work
* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---
## Changelog
* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.
## Migration Guide
If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:
```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible() {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Algorithmically-computed indication of whether an entity is visible and should be extracted for rendering
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
|
Add z-index support with a predictable UI stack (#5877)
# Objective
Add consistent UI rendering and interaction where deep nodes inside two different hierarchies will never render on top of one-another by default and offer an escape hatch (z-index) for nodes to change their depth.
## The problem with current implementation
The current implementation of UI rendering is broken in that regard, mainly because [it sets the Z value of the `Transform` component based on a "global Z" space](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/crates/bevy_ui/src/update.rs#L43) shared by all nodes in the UI. This doesn't account for the fact that each node's final `GlobalTransform` value will be relative to its parent. This effectively makes the depth unpredictable when two deep trees are rendered on top of one-another.
At the moment, it's also up to each part of the UI code to sort all of the UI nodes. The solution that's offered here does the full sorting of UI node entities once and offers the result through a resource so that all systems can use it.
## Solution
### New ZIndex component
This adds a new optional `ZIndex` enum component for nodes which offers two mechanism:
- `ZIndex::Local(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to its siblings.
- `ZIndex::Global(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to the UI root. This basically allows any node in the tree to "escape" the parent and be ordered relative to the entire UI.
Note that in the current implementation, omitting `ZIndex` on a node has the same result as adding `ZIndex::Local(0)`. Additionally, the "global" stacking context is essentially a way to add your node to the root stacking context, so using `ZIndex::Local(n)` on a root node (one without parent) will share that space with all nodes using `Index::Global(n)`.
### New UiStack resource
This adds a new `UiStack` resource which is calculated from both hierarchy and `ZIndex` during UI update and contains a vector of all node entities in the UI, ordered by depth (from farthest from camera to closest). This is exposed publicly by the bevy_ui crate with the hope that it can be used for consistent ordering and to reduce the amount of sorting that needs to be done by UI systems (i.e. instead of sorting everything by `global_transform.z` in every system, this array can be iterated over).
### New z_index example
This also adds a new z_index example that showcases the new `ZIndex` component. It's also a good general demo of the new UI stack system, because making this kind of UI was very broken with the old system (e.g. nodes would render on top of each other, not respecting hierarchy or insert order at all).
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/189015985-8ea8f989-0e9d-4601-a7e0-4a27a43a53f9.png)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `ZIndex` component to bevy_ui.
- Added the `UiStack` resource to bevy_ui, and added implementation in a new `stack.rs` module.
- Removed the previous Z updating system from bevy_ui, because it was replaced with the above.
- Changed bevy_ui rendering to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Changed bevy_ui focus/interaction system to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Added a new z_index example.
## ZIndex demo
Here's a demo I wrote to test these features
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/188329295-d7beebd6-9aee-43ab-821e-d437df5dbe8a.mp4
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 22:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Indicates the depth at which the node should appear in the UI
|
|
|
|
pub z_index: ZIndex,
|
2020-07-28 07:37:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// A UI node that is a texture atlas sprite
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Bundle, Debug, Default)]
|
|
|
|
pub struct AtlasImageBundle {
|
|
|
|
/// Describes the logical size of the node
|
|
|
|
pub node: Node,
|
|
|
|
/// Styles which control the layout (size and position) of the node and it's children
|
|
|
|
/// In some cases these styles also affect how the node drawn/painted.
|
|
|
|
pub style: Style,
|
|
|
|
/// The calculated size based on the given image
|
|
|
|
pub calculated_size: ContentSize,
|
|
|
|
/// The background color, which serves as a "fill" for this node
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Combines with `UiImage` to tint the provided image.
|
|
|
|
pub background_color: BackgroundColor,
|
|
|
|
/// A handle to the texture atlas to use for this Ui Node
|
|
|
|
pub texture_atlas: Handle<TextureAtlas>,
|
|
|
|
/// The descriptor for which sprite to use from the given texture atlas
|
|
|
|
pub texture_atlas_image: UiTextureAtlasImage,
|
|
|
|
/// Whether this node should block interaction with lower nodes
|
|
|
|
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
|
|
|
|
/// The size of the image in pixels
|
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is set automatically
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
pub image_size: UiImageSize,
|
|
|
|
/// The transform of the node
|
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically managed by the UI layout system.
|
2023-08-21 01:39:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To alter the position of the `AtlasImageBundle`, use the properties of the [`Style`] component.
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
pub transform: Transform,
|
|
|
|
/// The global transform of the node
|
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically updated by the [`TransformPropagate`](`bevy_transform::TransformSystem::TransformPropagate`) systems.
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
|
|
|
|
/// Describes the visibility properties of the node
|
|
|
|
pub visibility: Visibility,
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Inherited visibility of an entity.
|
|
|
|
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Algorithmically-computed indication of whether an entity is visible and should be extracted for rendering
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
|
2023-06-19 21:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Indicates the depth at which the node should appear in the UI
|
|
|
|
pub z_index: ZIndex,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-24 02:21:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(feature = "bevy_text")]
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// A UI node that is text
|
2023-05-01 15:40:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Bundle, Debug)]
|
2020-11-16 04:32:23 +00:00
|
|
|
pub struct TextBundle {
|
2023-03-04 19:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the logical size of the node
|
2020-05-18 01:09:29 +00:00
|
|
|
pub node: Node,
|
2023-04-17 16:21:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Styles which control the layout (size and position) of the node and it's children
|
|
|
|
/// In some cases these styles also affect how the node drawn/painted.
|
2020-07-26 19:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
pub style: Style,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Contains the text of the node
|
2020-07-20 03:33:55 +00:00
|
|
|
pub text: Text,
|
`text_system` split (#7779)
# Objective
`text_system` runs before the UI layout is calculated and the size of
the text node is determined, so it cannot correctly shape the text to
fit the layout, and has no way of determining if the text needs to be
wrapped.
The function `text_constraint` attempts to determine the size of the
node from the local size constraints in the `Style` component. It can't
be made to work, you have to compute the whole layout to get the correct
size. A simple example of where this fails completely is a text node set
to stretch to fill the empty space adjacent to a node with size
constraints set to `Val::Percent(50.)`. The text node will take up half
the space, even though its size constraints are `Val::Auto`
Also because the `text_system` queries for changes to the `Style`
component, when a style value is changed that doesn't affect the node's
geometry the text is recomputed unnecessarily.
Querying on changes to `Node` is not much better. The UI layout is
changed to fit the `CalculatedSize` of the text, so the size of the node
is changed and so the text and UI layout get recalculated multiple times
from a single change to a `Text`.
Also, the `MeasureFunc` doesn't work at all, it doesn't have enough
information to fit the text correctly and makes no attempt.
Fixes #7663, #6717, #5834, #1490,
## Solution
Split the `text_system` into two functions:
* `measure_text_system` which calculates the size constraints for the
text node and runs before `UiSystem::Flex`
* `text_system` which runs after `UiSystem::Flex` and generates the
actual text.
* Fix the `MeasureFunc` calculations.
---
Text wrapping in main:
<img width="961" alt="Capturemain"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425740-4fe4bf46-24fb-4685-a1cf-bc01e139e72d.PNG">
With this PR:
<img width="961" alt="captured_wrap"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425807-949996b0-f127-4637-9f33-56a6da944fb0.PNG">
## Changelog
* Removed the previous fields from `CalculatedSize`. `CalculatedSize`
now contains a boxed `Measure`.
* Added `measurement` module to `bevy_ui`.
* Added the method `create_text_measure` to `TextPipeline`.
* Added a new system `measure_text_system` that runs before
`UiSystem::Flex` that creates a `MeasureFunc` for the text.
* Rescheduled `text_system` to run after `UiSystem::Flex`.
* Added a trait `Measure`. A `Measure` is used to compute the size of a
UI node when the size of that node is based on its content.
* Added `ImageMeasure` and `TextMeasure` which implement `Measure`.
* Added a new component `UiImageSize` which is used by
`update_image_calculated_size_system` to track image size changes.
* Added a `UiImageSize` component to `ImageBundle`.
## Migration Guide
`ImageBundle` has a new component `UiImageSize` which contains the size
of the image bundle's texture and is updated automatically by
`update_image_calculated_size_system`
---------
Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-04-17 15:23:21 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Text layout information
|
|
|
|
pub text_layout_info: TextLayoutInfo,
|
2023-05-08 13:57:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Text system flags
|
|
|
|
pub text_flags: TextFlags,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The calculated size based on the given image
|
2023-05-01 15:40:53 +00:00
|
|
|
pub calculated_size: ContentSize,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Whether this node should block interaction with lower nodes
|
2020-07-19 00:03:37 +00:00
|
|
|
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically managed by the UI layout system.
|
2023-08-21 01:39:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To alter the position of the `TextBundle`, use the properties of the [`Style`] component.
|
2020-06-25 17:13:00 +00:00
|
|
|
pub transform: Transform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The global transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically updated by the [`TransformPropagate`](`bevy_transform::TransformSystem::TransformPropagate`) systems.
|
2020-09-14 21:00:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the visibility properties of the node
|
2021-12-24 07:10:12 +00:00
|
|
|
pub visibility: Visibility,
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Inherited visibility of an entity.
|
|
|
|
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
|
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective
Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114
Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.
Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.
## Solution
Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.
Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.
This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.
Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.
Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)
Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale.
## Follow up work
* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---
## Changelog
* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.
## Migration Guide
If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:
```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible() {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Algorithmically-computed indication of whether an entity is visible and should be extracted for rendering
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
|
Add z-index support with a predictable UI stack (#5877)
# Objective
Add consistent UI rendering and interaction where deep nodes inside two different hierarchies will never render on top of one-another by default and offer an escape hatch (z-index) for nodes to change their depth.
## The problem with current implementation
The current implementation of UI rendering is broken in that regard, mainly because [it sets the Z value of the `Transform` component based on a "global Z" space](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/crates/bevy_ui/src/update.rs#L43) shared by all nodes in the UI. This doesn't account for the fact that each node's final `GlobalTransform` value will be relative to its parent. This effectively makes the depth unpredictable when two deep trees are rendered on top of one-another.
At the moment, it's also up to each part of the UI code to sort all of the UI nodes. The solution that's offered here does the full sorting of UI node entities once and offers the result through a resource so that all systems can use it.
## Solution
### New ZIndex component
This adds a new optional `ZIndex` enum component for nodes which offers two mechanism:
- `ZIndex::Local(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to its siblings.
- `ZIndex::Global(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to the UI root. This basically allows any node in the tree to "escape" the parent and be ordered relative to the entire UI.
Note that in the current implementation, omitting `ZIndex` on a node has the same result as adding `ZIndex::Local(0)`. Additionally, the "global" stacking context is essentially a way to add your node to the root stacking context, so using `ZIndex::Local(n)` on a root node (one without parent) will share that space with all nodes using `Index::Global(n)`.
### New UiStack resource
This adds a new `UiStack` resource which is calculated from both hierarchy and `ZIndex` during UI update and contains a vector of all node entities in the UI, ordered by depth (from farthest from camera to closest). This is exposed publicly by the bevy_ui crate with the hope that it can be used for consistent ordering and to reduce the amount of sorting that needs to be done by UI systems (i.e. instead of sorting everything by `global_transform.z` in every system, this array can be iterated over).
### New z_index example
This also adds a new z_index example that showcases the new `ZIndex` component. It's also a good general demo of the new UI stack system, because making this kind of UI was very broken with the old system (e.g. nodes would render on top of each other, not respecting hierarchy or insert order at all).
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/189015985-8ea8f989-0e9d-4601-a7e0-4a27a43a53f9.png)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `ZIndex` component to bevy_ui.
- Added the `UiStack` resource to bevy_ui, and added implementation in a new `stack.rs` module.
- Removed the previous Z updating system from bevy_ui, because it was replaced with the above.
- Changed bevy_ui rendering to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Changed bevy_ui focus/interaction system to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Added a new z_index example.
## ZIndex demo
Here's a demo I wrote to test these features
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/188329295-d7beebd6-9aee-43ab-821e-d437df5dbe8a.mp4
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 22:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Indicates the depth at which the node should appear in the UI
|
|
|
|
pub z_index: ZIndex,
|
2023-02-20 22:42:46 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The background color that will fill the containing node
|
|
|
|
pub background_color: BackgroundColor,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-24 02:21:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(feature = "bevy_text")]
|
2023-02-20 22:42:46 +00:00
|
|
|
impl Default for TextBundle {
|
|
|
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
text: Default::default(),
|
`text_system` split (#7779)
# Objective
`text_system` runs before the UI layout is calculated and the size of
the text node is determined, so it cannot correctly shape the text to
fit the layout, and has no way of determining if the text needs to be
wrapped.
The function `text_constraint` attempts to determine the size of the
node from the local size constraints in the `Style` component. It can't
be made to work, you have to compute the whole layout to get the correct
size. A simple example of where this fails completely is a text node set
to stretch to fill the empty space adjacent to a node with size
constraints set to `Val::Percent(50.)`. The text node will take up half
the space, even though its size constraints are `Val::Auto`
Also because the `text_system` queries for changes to the `Style`
component, when a style value is changed that doesn't affect the node's
geometry the text is recomputed unnecessarily.
Querying on changes to `Node` is not much better. The UI layout is
changed to fit the `CalculatedSize` of the text, so the size of the node
is changed and so the text and UI layout get recalculated multiple times
from a single change to a `Text`.
Also, the `MeasureFunc` doesn't work at all, it doesn't have enough
information to fit the text correctly and makes no attempt.
Fixes #7663, #6717, #5834, #1490,
## Solution
Split the `text_system` into two functions:
* `measure_text_system` which calculates the size constraints for the
text node and runs before `UiSystem::Flex`
* `text_system` which runs after `UiSystem::Flex` and generates the
actual text.
* Fix the `MeasureFunc` calculations.
---
Text wrapping in main:
<img width="961" alt="Capturemain"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425740-4fe4bf46-24fb-4685-a1cf-bc01e139e72d.PNG">
With this PR:
<img width="961" alt="captured_wrap"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27962798/220425807-949996b0-f127-4637-9f33-56a6da944fb0.PNG">
## Changelog
* Removed the previous fields from `CalculatedSize`. `CalculatedSize`
now contains a boxed `Measure`.
* Added `measurement` module to `bevy_ui`.
* Added the method `create_text_measure` to `TextPipeline`.
* Added a new system `measure_text_system` that runs before
`UiSystem::Flex` that creates a `MeasureFunc` for the text.
* Rescheduled `text_system` to run after `UiSystem::Flex`.
* Added a trait `Measure`. A `Measure` is used to compute the size of a
UI node when the size of that node is based on its content.
* Added `ImageMeasure` and `TextMeasure` which implement `Measure`.
* Added a new component `UiImageSize` which is used by
`update_image_calculated_size_system` to track image size changes.
* Added a `UiImageSize` component to `ImageBundle`.
## Migration Guide
`ImageBundle` has a new component `UiImageSize` which contains the size
of the image bundle's texture and is updated automatically by
`update_image_calculated_size_system`
---------
Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-04-17 15:23:21 +00:00
|
|
|
text_layout_info: Default::default(),
|
2023-05-08 13:57:52 +00:00
|
|
|
text_flags: Default::default(),
|
2023-02-20 22:42:46 +00:00
|
|
|
calculated_size: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
node: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
style: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
focus_policy: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
transform: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
global_transform: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
visibility: Default::default(),
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
inherited_visibility: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
view_visibility: Default::default(),
|
2023-02-20 22:42:46 +00:00
|
|
|
z_index: Default::default(),
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
// Transparent background
|
|
|
|
background_color: BackgroundColor(Color::NONE),
|
2023-02-20 22:42:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-05-18 01:09:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-02-24 02:21:07 +00:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(feature = "bevy_text")]
|
2022-07-20 14:14:29 +00:00
|
|
|
impl TextBundle {
|
|
|
|
/// Create a [`TextBundle`] from a single section.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// See [`Text::from_section`] for usage.
|
|
|
|
pub fn from_section(value: impl Into<String>, style: TextStyle) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
text: Text::from_section(value, style),
|
|
|
|
..Default::default()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Create a [`TextBundle`] from a list of sections.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// See [`Text::from_sections`] for usage.
|
|
|
|
pub fn from_sections(sections: impl IntoIterator<Item = TextSection>) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
text: Text::from_sections(sections),
|
|
|
|
..Default::default()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns this [`TextBundle`] with a new [`TextAlignment`] on [`Text`].
|
|
|
|
pub const fn with_text_alignment(mut self, alignment: TextAlignment) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.text.alignment = alignment;
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns this [`TextBundle`] with a new [`Style`].
|
2023-04-17 16:21:38 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn with_style(mut self, style: Style) -> Self {
|
2022-07-20 14:14:29 +00:00
|
|
|
self.style = style;
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-02-20 22:42:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns this [`TextBundle`] with a new [`BackgroundColor`].
|
|
|
|
pub const fn with_background_color(mut self, color: Color) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.background_color = BackgroundColor(color);
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-26 16:23:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns this [`TextBundle`] with soft wrapping disabled.
|
|
|
|
/// Hard wrapping, where text contains an explicit linebreak such as the escape sequence `\n`, will still occur.
|
|
|
|
pub const fn with_no_wrap(mut self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
self.text.linebreak_behavior = BreakLineOn::NoWrap;
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-07-20 14:14:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
`impl From<String>` and `From<&str>` for `TextSection` (#8856)
# Objective
Implement `From<String>` and `From<&str>` for `TextSection`
Example from something I was working on earlier:
```rust
parent.spawn(TextBundle::from_sections([
TextSection::new("press ".to_string(), TextStyle::default()),
TextSection::new("space".to_string(), TextStyle { color: Color::YELLOW, ..default() }),
TextSection::new(" to advance frames".to_string(), TextStyle::default()),
]));
```
After an `impl From<&str> for TextSection` :
```rust
parent.spawn(TextBundle::from_sections([
"press ".into(),
TextSection::new("space".to_string(), TextStyle { color: Color::YELLOW, ..default() }),
" to advance frames".into(),
]));
```
* Potentially unhelpful without a default font, so behind the
`default_font` feature.
Co-authored-by: [hate](https://github.com/hate)
---------
Co-authored-by: hate <15314665+hate@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-11 19:00:50 +00:00
|
|
|
impl<I> From<I> for TextBundle
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
I: Into<TextSection>,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
fn from(value: I) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self::from_sections(vec![value.into()])
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// A UI node that is a button
|
2023-01-12 17:15:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Bundle, Clone, Debug)]
|
2020-11-16 04:32:23 +00:00
|
|
|
pub struct ButtonBundle {
|
2023-03-04 19:24:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the logical size of the node
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
pub node: Node,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Marker component that signals this node is a button
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
pub button: Button,
|
2023-04-17 16:21:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Styles which control the layout (size and position) of the node and it's children
|
|
|
|
/// In some cases these styles also affect how the node drawn/painted.
|
2020-07-26 19:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
pub style: Style,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes whether and how the button has been interacted with by the input
|
2020-07-28 08:20:19 +00:00
|
|
|
pub interaction: Interaction,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Whether this node should block interaction with lower nodes
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
|
2022-09-25 00:39:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The background color, which serves as a "fill" for this node
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// When combined with `UiImage`, tints the provided image.
|
|
|
|
pub background_color: BackgroundColor,
|
2023-06-14 22:43:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The color of the Node's border
|
|
|
|
pub border_color: BorderColor,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The image of the node
|
2021-12-14 03:58:23 +00:00
|
|
|
pub image: UiImage,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically managed by the UI layout system.
|
2023-08-21 01:39:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/// To alter the position of the `ButtonBundle`, use the properties of the [`Style`] component.
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
pub transform: Transform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// The global transform of the node
|
2022-09-26 01:31:22 +00:00
|
|
|
///
|
2023-08-28 18:55:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/// This component is automatically updated by the [`TransformPropagate`](`bevy_transform::TransformSystem::TransformPropagate`) systems.
|
2020-09-14 21:00:32 +00:00
|
|
|
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
|
2022-01-07 22:20:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Describes the visibility properties of the node
|
2021-12-24 07:10:12 +00:00
|
|
|
pub visibility: Visibility,
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Inherited visibility of an entity.
|
|
|
|
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
|
Visibilty Inheritance, universal ComputedVisibility and RenderLayers support (#5310)
# Objective
Fixes #4907. Fixes #838. Fixes #5089.
Supersedes #5146. Supersedes #2087. Supersedes #865. Supersedes #5114
Visibility is currently entirely local. Set a parent entity to be invisible, and the children are still visible. This makes it hard for users to hide entire hierarchies of entities.
Additionally, the semantics of `Visibility` vs `ComputedVisibility` are inconsistent across entity types. 3D meshes use `ComputedVisibility` as the "definitive" visibility component, with `Visibility` being just one data source. Sprites just use `Visibility`, which means they can't feed off of `ComputedVisibility` data, such as culling information, RenderLayers, and (added in this pr) visibility inheritance information.
## Solution
Splits `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible` into `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_view` and `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible_in_hierarchy`. For each visible entity, `is_visible_in_hierarchy` is computed by propagating visibility down the hierarchy. The `ComputedVisibility::is_visible()` function combines these two booleans for the canonical "is this entity visible" function.
Additionally, all entities that have `Visibility` now also have `ComputedVisibility`. Sprites, Lights, and UI entities now use `ComputedVisibility` when appropriate.
This means that in addition to visibility inheritance, everything using Visibility now also supports RenderLayers. Notably, Sprites (and other 2d objects) now support `RenderLayers` and work properly across multiple views.
Also note that this does increase the amount of work done per sprite. Bevymark with 100,000 sprites on `main` runs in `0.017612` seconds and this runs in `0.01902`. That is certainly a gap, but I believe the api consistency and extra functionality this buys us is worth it. See [this thread](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for more info. Note that #5146 in combination with #5114 _are_ a viable alternative to this PR and _would_ perform better, but that comes at the cost of api inconsistencies and doing visibility calculations in the "wrong" place. The current visibility system does have potential for performance improvements. I would prefer to evolve that one system as a whole rather than doing custom hacks / different behaviors for each feature slice.
Here is a "split screen" example where the left camera uses RenderLayers to filter out the blue sprite.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2694663/178814868-2e9a2173-bf8c-4c79-8815-633899d492c3.png)
Note that this builds directly on #5146 and that @james7132 deserves the credit for the baseline visibility inheritance work. This pr moves the inherited visibility field into `ComputedVisibility`, then does the additional work of porting everything to `ComputedVisibility`. See my [comments here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5146#issuecomment-1182783452) for rationale.
## Follow up work
* Now that lights use ComputedVisibility, VisibleEntities now includes "visible lights" in the entity list. Functionally not a problem as we use queries to filter the list down in the desired context. But we should consider splitting this out into a separate`VisibleLights` collection for both clarity and performance reasons. And _maybe_ even consider scoping `VisibleEntities` down to `VisibleMeshes`?.
* Investigate alternative sprite rendering impls (in combination with visibility system tweaks) that avoid re-generating a per-view fixedbitset of visible entities every frame, then checking each ExtractedEntity. This is where most of the performance overhead lives. Ex: we could generate ExtractedEntities per-view using the VisibleEntities list, avoiding the need for the bitset.
* Should ComputedVisibility use bitflags under the hood? This would cut down on the size of the component, potentially speed up the `is_visible()` function, and allow us to cheaply expand ComputedVisibility with more data (ex: split out local visibility and parent visibility, add more culling classes, etc).
---
## Changelog
* ComputedVisibility now takes hierarchy visibility into account.
* 2D, UI and Light entities now use the ComputedVisibility component.
## Migration Guide
If you were previously reading `Visibility::is_visible` as the "actual visibility" for sprites or lights, use `ComputedVisibilty::is_visible()` instead:
```rust
// before (0.7)
fn system(query: Query<&Visibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
// after (0.8)
fn system(query: Query<&ComputedVisibility>) {
for visibility in query.iter() {
if visibility.is_visible() {
log!("found visible entity");
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-07-15 23:24:42 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Algorithmically-computed indication of whether an entity is visible and should be extracted for rendering
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
|
Add z-index support with a predictable UI stack (#5877)
# Objective
Add consistent UI rendering and interaction where deep nodes inside two different hierarchies will never render on top of one-another by default and offer an escape hatch (z-index) for nodes to change their depth.
## The problem with current implementation
The current implementation of UI rendering is broken in that regard, mainly because [it sets the Z value of the `Transform` component based on a "global Z" space](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/crates/bevy_ui/src/update.rs#L43) shared by all nodes in the UI. This doesn't account for the fact that each node's final `GlobalTransform` value will be relative to its parent. This effectively makes the depth unpredictable when two deep trees are rendered on top of one-another.
At the moment, it's also up to each part of the UI code to sort all of the UI nodes. The solution that's offered here does the full sorting of UI node entities once and offers the result through a resource so that all systems can use it.
## Solution
### New ZIndex component
This adds a new optional `ZIndex` enum component for nodes which offers two mechanism:
- `ZIndex::Local(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to its siblings.
- `ZIndex::Global(i32)`: Overrides the depth of the node relative to the UI root. This basically allows any node in the tree to "escape" the parent and be ordered relative to the entire UI.
Note that in the current implementation, omitting `ZIndex` on a node has the same result as adding `ZIndex::Local(0)`. Additionally, the "global" stacking context is essentially a way to add your node to the root stacking context, so using `ZIndex::Local(n)` on a root node (one without parent) will share that space with all nodes using `Index::Global(n)`.
### New UiStack resource
This adds a new `UiStack` resource which is calculated from both hierarchy and `ZIndex` during UI update and contains a vector of all node entities in the UI, ordered by depth (from farthest from camera to closest). This is exposed publicly by the bevy_ui crate with the hope that it can be used for consistent ordering and to reduce the amount of sorting that needs to be done by UI systems (i.e. instead of sorting everything by `global_transform.z` in every system, this array can be iterated over).
### New z_index example
This also adds a new z_index example that showcases the new `ZIndex` component. It's also a good general demo of the new UI stack system, because making this kind of UI was very broken with the old system (e.g. nodes would render on top of each other, not respecting hierarchy or insert order at all).
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/189015985-8ea8f989-0e9d-4601-a7e0-4a27a43a53f9.png)
---
## Changelog
- Added the `ZIndex` component to bevy_ui.
- Added the `UiStack` resource to bevy_ui, and added implementation in a new `stack.rs` module.
- Removed the previous Z updating system from bevy_ui, because it was replaced with the above.
- Changed bevy_ui rendering to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Changed bevy_ui focus/interaction system to use UiStack instead of z ordering.
- Added a new z_index example.
## ZIndex demo
Here's a demo I wrote to test these features
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1060971/188329295-d7beebd6-9aee-43ab-821e-d437df5dbe8a.mp4
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 22:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
/// Indicates the depth at which the node should appear in the UI
|
|
|
|
pub z_index: ZIndex,
|
2020-07-18 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-01-12 17:15:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl Default for ButtonBundle {
|
|
|
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
focus_policy: FocusPolicy::Block,
|
|
|
|
node: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
button: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
style: Default::default(),
|
2023-06-14 22:43:38 +00:00
|
|
|
border_color: BorderColor(Color::NONE),
|
2023-01-12 17:15:20 +00:00
|
|
|
interaction: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
background_color: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
image: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
transform: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
global_transform: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
visibility: Default::default(),
|
Split `ComputedVisibility` into two components to allow for accurate change detection and speed up visibility propagation (#9497)
# Objective
Fix #8267.
Fixes half of #7840.
The `ComputedVisibility` component contains two flags: hierarchy
visibility, and view visibility (whether its visible to any cameras).
Due to the modular and open-ended way that view visibility is computed,
it triggers change detection every single frame, even when the value
does not change. Since hierarchy visibility is stored in the same
component as view visibility, this means that change detection for
inherited visibility is completely broken.
At the company I work for, this has become a real issue. We are using
change detection to only re-render scenes when necessary. The broken
state of change detection for computed visibility means that we have to
to rely on the non-inherited `Visibility` component for now. This is
workable in the early stages of our project, but since we will
inevitably want to use the hierarchy, we will have to either:
1. Roll our own solution for computed visibility.
2. Fix the issue for everyone.
## Solution
Split the `ComputedVisibility` component into two: `InheritedVisibilty`
and `ViewVisibility`.
This allows change detection to behave properly for
`InheritedVisibility`.
View visiblity is still erratic, although it is less useful to be able
to detect changes
for this flavor of visibility.
Overall, this actually simplifies the API. Since the visibility system
consists of
self-explaining components, it is much easier to document the behavior
and usage.
This approach is more modular and "ECS-like" -- one could
strip out the `ViewVisibility` component entirely if it's not needed,
and rely only on inherited visibility.
---
## Changelog
- `ComputedVisibility` has been removed in favor of:
`InheritedVisibility` and `ViewVisiblity`.
## Migration Guide
The `ComputedVisibilty` component has been split into
`InheritedVisiblity` and
`ViewVisibility`. Replace any usages of
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_hierarchy`
with `InheritedVisibility::get`, and replace
`ComputedVisibility::is_visible_in_view`
with `ViewVisibility::get`.
```rust
// Before:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
computed_visibility: ComputedVisibility::default(),
});
// After:
commands.spawn(VisibilityBundle {
visibility: Visibility::Inherited,
inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility::default(),
view_visibility: ViewVisibility::default(),
});
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_hierarchy() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&InheritedVisibility>) {
for inherited_visibility in &q {
if inherited_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &q {
if vis.is_visible_in_view() {
// After:
fn my_system(q: Query<&ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &q {
if view_visibility.get() {
```
```rust
// Before:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ComputedVisibilty>) {
for vis in &mut q {
vis.set_visible_in_view();
// After:
fn my_system(mut q: Query<&mut ViewVisibility>) {
for view_visibility in &mut q {
view_visibility.set();
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:00:18 +00:00
|
|
|
inherited_visibility: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
view_visibility: Default::default(),
|
2023-01-12 17:15:20 +00:00
|
|
|
z_index: Default::default(),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|