The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM
namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely
should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG
namespace and in to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS_NAND
namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely
should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG
namespace and in to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This code is only used on the corvus platform, so migrate the LED on/off
code to this platform and remove it from the CONFIG namespace. In
theory, this should likely be moved to the modern GPIO LED driver as a
further cleanup.
Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The current macro is a misnomer since it does not declare a device
directly. Instead, it declares driver_info record which U-Boot uses at
runtime to create a device.
The distinction seems somewhat minor most of the time, but is becomes
quite confusing when we actually want to declare a device, with
of-platdata. We are left trying to distinguish between a device which
isn't actually device, and a device that is (perhaps an 'instance'?)
It seems better to rename this macro to describe what it actually is. The
macros is not widely used, since boards should use devicetree to declare
devices.
Rename it to U_BOOT_DRVINFO(), which indicates clearly that this is
declaring a new driver_info record, not a device.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We use 'priv' for private data but often use 'platdata' for platform data.
We can't really use 'pdata' since that is ambiguous (it could mean private
or platform data).
Rename some of the latter variables to end with 'plat' for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Last user of this option went away in commit:
fdc7718999 ("board: usb_a9263: Update to support DT and DM")
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@iki.fi>
Due to introducing the new UTMI PLL clock handle functions,
use the functions to reduce the duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Due to introducing the new peripheral clock handle functions,
use these functions to reduce duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
[Rebased on current master, fixup for at91rm9200ek]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Add struct atmel_mpddrc_config to accommodate the mpddrc register
configurations, not using the mpddrc register map structure,
struct atmel_mpddrc, in order to increase readability and reduce
run-time memory use.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
To enable the clocks on the at91 boards a constant (0x4) is used.
This is replaced with a define in at91_pmc.h (1 << 2).
Signed-off-by: Erik van Luijk <evanluijk@interact.nl>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
On these boards the DDR is connected to a dedicated controller and not
to chip select 1 of the EBI.
Signed-off-by: Erik van Luijk <evanluijk@interact.nl>
Tested-by: Erik van Luijk <evanluijk@interact.nl>
The mpddr.c depends on ATMEL_BASE_MPDDRC for the base address to configure the controller.
This cannot be used when there is more than one controller (i.e. AT91SAM9G45, AT91SAM9M10).
Signed-off-by: Erik van Luijk <evanluijk@interact.nl>
[remove 'new blank line at EOF']
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
- corvus board fix problems with toshiba nand chips
on the corvus board problems with toshiba chips
Manufacturer ID: 0x98 Chip ID: 0xdc encounterd.
Solve this in the following way:
- set other nand timings
- enable CONFIG_SYS_NAND_READY_PIN
- correct the MACH_TYPE setting
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
replaces the at91bootstrap code with SPL code.
make the spl image with:
./tools/mkimage -T atmelimage -d spl/u-boot-spl.bin spl/boot.bin
this writes the length of the spl image into the 6th
execption vector. This is needed from the ROM bootloader.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
enable support for the siemens AT91SAM9G20 based board corvus.
Signed-off-by: Boris Schmidt <boris.schmidt@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Cc: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
