Add basic support for running U-Boot on the Embedded Artists LPC3250
Developer's Kit v2 board by launching U-Boot from the board's s1l loader
(which comes pre-installed on the board).
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
There's nothing special or unique to the lpc32xx that requires its own config
parameter for specifying the console uart index. Therefore instead of using
the lpc32xx-specific CONFIG_SYS_LPC32XX_UART include parameter, use the
already-available CONFIG_CONS_INDEX from Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Historically, the reset_cpu() function had an `addr` parameter which was
meant to pass in an address of the reset vector location, where the CPU
should reset to. This feature is no longer used anywhere in U-Boot as
all reset_cpu() implementations now ignore the passed value. Generic
code has been added which always calls reset_cpu() with `0` which means
this feature can no longer be used easily anyway.
Over time, many implementations seem to have "misunderstood" the
existence of this parameter as a way to customize/parameterize the reset
(e.g. COLD vs WARM resets). As this is not properly supported, the
code will almost always not do what it is intended to (because all
call-sites just call reset_cpu() with 0).
To avoid confusion and to clean up the codebase from unused left-overs
of the past, remove the `addr` parameter entirely. Code which intends
to support different kinds of resets should be rewritten as a sysreset
driver instead.
This transformation was done with the following coccinelle patch:
@@
expression argvalue;
@@
- reset_cpu(argvalue)
+ reset_cpu()
@@
identifier argname;
type argtype;
@@
- reset_cpu(argtype argname)
+ reset_cpu(void)
{ ... }
Signed-off-by: Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This reverts commit 576007aec9.
The parameter passed to reset_cpu() no longer holds a meaning as all
call-sites now pass the value 0. Thus, branching on it is essentially
dead code and will just confuse future readers.
Revert soft-reset support and just always perform a hard-reset for now.
This is a preparation for removal of the reset_cpu() parameter across
the entire tree in a later patch.
Fixes: 576007aec9 ("lpc32xx: cpu: add support for soft reset")
Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
Signed-off-by: Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
The current macro is a misnomer since it does not declare a device
directly. Instead, it declares driver_info record which U-Boot uses at
runtime to create a device.
The distinction seems somewhat minor most of the time, but is becomes
quite confusing when we actually want to declare a device, with
of-platdata. We are left trying to distinguish between a device which
isn't actually device, and a device that is (perhaps an 'instance'?)
It seems better to rename this macro to describe what it actually is. The
macros is not widely used, since boards should use devicetree to declare
devices.
Rename it to U_BOOT_DRVINFO(), which indicates clearly that this is
declaring a new driver_info record, not a device.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Move this header out of the common header. Network support is used in
quite a few places but it still does not warrant blanket inclusion.
Note that this net.h header itself has quite a lot in it. It could be
split into the driver-mode support, functions, structures, checksumming,
etc.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Following the example of most other SoCs in arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)
move the lpc32xx code from arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx to
arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx.
Following the checklist from
commit 01f1445630 ("ARM: prepare for moving SoC sources into mach-*"):
[1] move files from arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx to arch/arm/mach-lpx32xx
[2] add machine entry to arch/arm/Makefile
[3] remove "obj-y += ..." from arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile
[4] fix the Kconfig file path in arch/arm/Kconfig
[5] (no MAINTAINERS update)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
