# Objective
- Remove `derive_more`'s error derivation and replace it with
`thiserror`
## Solution
- Added `derive_more`'s `error` feature to `deny.toml` to prevent it
sneaking back in.
- Reverted to `thiserror` error derivation
## Notes
Merge conflicts were too numerous to revert the individual changes, so
this reversion was done manually. Please scrutinise carefully during
review.
# Objective
- Fixes#16208
## Solution
- Added an associated type to `Component`, `Mutability`, which flags
whether a component is mutable, or immutable. If `Mutability= Mutable`,
the component is mutable. If `Mutability= Immutable`, the component is
immutable.
- Updated `derive_component` to default to mutable unless an
`#[component(immutable)]` attribute is added.
- Updated `ReflectComponent` to check if a component is mutable and, if
not, panic when attempting to mutate.
## Testing
- CI
- `immutable_components` example.
---
## Showcase
Users can now mark a component as `#[component(immutable)]` to prevent
safe mutation of a component while it is attached to an entity:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[component(immutable)]
struct Foo {
// ...
}
```
This prevents creating an exclusive reference to the component while it
is attached to an entity. This is particularly powerful when combined
with component hooks, as you can now fully track a component's value,
ensuring whatever invariants you desire are upheld. Before this would be
done my making a component private, and manually creating a `QueryData`
implementation which only permitted read access.
<details>
<summary>Using immutable components as an index</summary>
```rust
/// This is an example of a component like [`Name`](bevy::prelude::Name), but immutable.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash, Component)]
#[component(
immutable,
on_insert = on_insert_name,
on_replace = on_replace_name,
)]
pub struct Name(pub &'static str);
/// This index allows for O(1) lookups of an [`Entity`] by its [`Name`].
#[derive(Resource, Default)]
struct NameIndex {
name_to_entity: HashMap<Name, Entity>,
}
impl NameIndex {
fn get_entity(&self, name: &'static str) -> Option<Entity> {
self.name_to_entity.get(&Name(name)).copied()
}
}
fn on_insert_name(mut world: DeferredWorld<'_>, entity: Entity, _component: ComponentId) {
let Some(&name) = world.entity(entity).get::<Name>() else {
unreachable!()
};
let Some(mut index) = world.get_resource_mut::<NameIndex>() else {
return;
};
index.name_to_entity.insert(name, entity);
}
fn on_replace_name(mut world: DeferredWorld<'_>, entity: Entity, _component: ComponentId) {
let Some(&name) = world.entity(entity).get::<Name>() else {
unreachable!()
};
let Some(mut index) = world.get_resource_mut::<NameIndex>() else {
return;
};
index.name_to_entity.remove(&name);
}
// Setup our name index
world.init_resource::<NameIndex>();
// Spawn some entities!
let alyssa = world.spawn(Name("Alyssa")).id();
let javier = world.spawn(Name("Javier")).id();
// Check our index
let index = world.resource::<NameIndex>();
assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Alyssa"), Some(alyssa));
assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Javier"), Some(javier));
// Changing the name of an entity is also fully capture by our index
world.entity_mut(javier).insert(Name("Steven"));
// Javier changed their name to Steven
let steven = javier;
// Check our index
let index = world.resource::<NameIndex>();
assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Javier"), None);
assert_eq!(index.get_entity("Steven"), Some(steven));
```
</details>
Additionally, users can use `Component<Mutability = ...>` in trait
bounds to enforce that a component _is_ mutable or _is_ immutable. When
using `Component` as a trait bound without specifying `Mutability`, any
component is applicable. However, methods which only work on mutable or
immutable components are unavailable, since the compiler must be
pessimistic about the type.
## Migration Guide
- When implementing `Component` manually, you must now provide a type
for `Mutability`. The type `Mutable` provides equivalent behaviour to
earlier versions of `Component`:
```rust
impl Component for Foo {
type Mutability = Mutable;
// ...
}
```
- When working with generic components, you may need to specify that
your generic parameter implements `Component<Mutability = Mutable>`
rather than `Component` if you require mutable access to said component.
- The entity entry API has had to have some changes made to minimise
friction when working with immutable components. Methods which
previously returned a `Mut<T>` will now typically return an
`OccupiedEntry<T>` instead, requiring you to add an `into_mut()` to get
the `Mut<T>` item again.
## Draft Release Notes
Components can now be made immutable while stored within the ECS.
Components are the fundamental unit of data within an ECS, and Bevy
provides a number of ways to work with them that align with Rust's rules
around ownership and borrowing. One part of this is hooks, which allow
for defining custom behavior at key points in a component's lifecycle,
such as addition and removal. However, there is currently no way to
respond to _mutation_ of a component using hooks. The reasons for this
are quite technical, but to summarize, their addition poses a
significant challenge to Bevy's core promises around performance.
Without mutation hooks, it's relatively trivial to modify a component in
such a way that breaks invariants it intends to uphold. For example, you
can use `core::mem::swap` to swap the components of two entities,
bypassing the insertion and removal hooks.
This means the only way to react to this modification is via change
detection in a system, which then begs the question of what happens
_between_ that alteration and the next run of that system?
Alternatively, you could make your component private to prevent
mutation, but now you need to provide commands and a custom `QueryData`
implementation to allow users to interact with your component at all.
Immutable components solve this problem by preventing the creation of an
exclusive reference to the component entirely. Without an exclusive
reference, the only way to modify an immutable component is via removal
or replacement, which is fully captured by component hooks. To make a
component immutable, simply add `#[component(immutable)]`:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[component(immutable)]
struct Foo {
// ...
}
```
When implementing `Component` manually, there is an associated type
`Mutability` which controls this behavior:
```rust
impl Component for Foo {
type Mutability = Mutable;
// ...
}
```
Note that this means when working with generic components, you may need
to specify that a component is mutable to gain access to certain
methods:
```rust
// Before
fn bar<C: Component>() {
// ...
}
// After
fn bar<C: Component<Mutability = Mutable>>() {
// ...
}
```
With this new tool, creating index components, or caching data on an
entity should be more user friendly, allowing libraries to provide APIs
relying on components and hooks to uphold their invariants.
## Notes
- ~~I've done my best to implement this feature, but I'm not happy with
how reflection has turned out. If any reflection SMEs know a way to
improve this situation I'd greatly appreciate it.~~ There is an
outstanding issue around the fallibility of mutable methods on
`ReflectComponent`, but the DX is largely unchanged from `main` now.
- I've attempted to prevent all safe mutable access to a component that
does not implement `Component<Mutability = Mutable>`, but there may
still be some methods I have missed. Please indicate so and I will
address them, as they are bugs.
- Unsafe is an escape hatch I am _not_ attempting to prevent. Whatever
you do with unsafe is between you and your compiler.
- I am marking this PR as ready, but I suspect it will undergo fairly
major revisions based on SME feedback.
- I've marked this PR as _Uncontroversial_ based on the feature, not the
implementation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi>
# Objective
Make documentation of a component's required components more visible by
moving it to the type's docs
## Solution
Change `#[require]` from a derive macro helper to an attribute macro.
Disadvantages:
- this silences any unused code warnings on the component, as it is used
by the macro!
- need to import `require` if not using the ecs prelude (I have not
included this in the migration guilde as Rust tooling already suggests
the fix)
---
## Showcase
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JMS55 <47158642+JMS55@users.noreply.github.com>
## Objective
Fixes#1515
This PR implements a flexible entity cloning system. The primary use
case for it is to clone dynamically-generated entities.
Example:
```rs
#[derive(Component, Clone)]
pub struct Projectile;
#[derive(Component, Clone)]
pub struct Damage {
value: f32,
}
fn player_input(
mut commands: Commands,
projectiles: Query<Entity, With<Projectile>>,
input: Res<ButtonInput<KeyCode>>,
) {
// Fire a projectile
if input.just_pressed(KeyCode::KeyF) {
commands.spawn((Projectile, Damage { value: 10.0 }));
}
// Triplicate all active projectiles
if input.just_pressed(KeyCode::KeyT) {
for projectile in projectiles.iter() {
// To triplicate a projectile we need to create 2 more clones
for _ in 0..2{
commands.clone_entity(projectile)
}
}
}
}
```
## Solution
### Commands
Add a `clone_entity` command to create a clone of an entity with all
components that can be cloned. Components that can't be cloned will be
ignored.
```rs
commands.clone_entity(entity)
```
If there is a need to configure the cloning process (like set to clone
recursively), there is a second command:
```rs
commands.clone_entity_with(entity, |builder| {
builder.recursive(true)
});
```
Both of these commands return `EntityCommands` of the cloned entity, so
the copy can be modified afterwards.
### Builder
All these commands use `EntityCloneBuilder` internally. If there is a
need to clone an entity using `World` instead, it is also possible:
```rs
let entity = world.spawn(Component).id();
let entity_clone = world.spawn_empty().id();
EntityCloneBuilder::new(&mut world).clone_entity(entity, entity_clone);
```
Builder has methods to `allow` or `deny` certain components during
cloning if required and can be extended by implementing traits on it.
This PR includes two `EntityCloneBuilder` extensions:
`CloneEntityWithObserversExt` to configure adding cloned entity to
observers of the original entity, and `CloneEntityRecursiveExt` to
configure cloning an entity recursively.
### Clone implementations
By default, all components that implement either `Clone` or `Reflect`
will be cloned (with `Clone`-based implementation preferred in case
component implements both).
This can be overriden on a per-component basis:
```rs
impl Component for SomeComponent {
const STORAGE_TYPE: StorageType = StorageType::Table;
fn get_component_clone_handler() -> ComponentCloneHandler {
// Don't clone this component
ComponentCloneHandler::Ignore
}
}
```
### `ComponentCloneHandlers`
Clone implementation specified in `get_component_clone_handler` will get
registered in `ComponentCloneHandlers` (stored in
`bevy_ecs::component::Components`) at component registration time.
The clone handler implementation provided by a component can be
overriden after registration like so:
```rs
let component_id = world.components().component_id::<Component>().unwrap()
world.get_component_clone_handlers_mut()
.set_component_handler(component_id, ComponentCloneHandler::Custom(component_clone_custom))
```
The default clone handler for all components that do not explicitly
define one (or don't derive `Component`) is
`component_clone_via_reflect` if `bevy_reflect` feature is enabled, and
`component_clone_ignore` (noop) otherwise.
Default handler can be overriden using
`ComponentCloneHandlers::set_default_handler`
### Handlers
Component clone handlers can be used to modify component cloning
behavior. The general signature for a handler that can be used in
`ComponentCloneHandler::Custom` is as follows:
```rs
pub fn component_clone_custom(
world: &mut DeferredWorld,
entity_cloner: &EntityCloner,
) {
// implementation
}
```
The `EntityCloner` implementation (used internally by
`EntityCloneBuilder`) assumes that after calling this custom handler,
the `target` entity has the desired version of the component from the
`source` entity.
### Builder handler overrides
Besides component-defined and world-overriden handlers,
`EntityCloneBuilder` also has a way to override handlers locally. It is
mainly used to allow configuration methods like `recursive` and
`add_observers`.
```rs
// From observer clone handler implementation
impl CloneEntityWithObserversExt for EntityCloneBuilder<'_> {
fn add_observers(&mut self, add_observers: bool) -> &mut Self {
if add_observers {
self.override_component_clone_handler::<ObservedBy>(ComponentCloneHandler::Custom(
component_clone_observed_by,
))
} else {
self.remove_component_clone_handler_override::<ObservedBy>()
}
}
}
```
## Testing
Includes some basic functionality tests and doctests.
Performance-wise this feature is the same as calling `clone` followed by
`insert` for every entity component. There is also some inherent
overhead due to every component clone handler having to access component
data through `World`, but this can be reduced without breaking current
public API in a later PR.
Co-authored by: @BenjaminBrienen
# Objective
Fixes#16494. Closes#16539, which this replaces. Suggestions alone
weren't enough, so now we have a new PR!
---------
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#16406 even more. The previous implementation did not take into
account the depth of the requiree when setting the depth relative to the
required_by component.
## Solution
- Add the depth of the requiree!
## Testing
- Added a test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#16406
- Fixes an issue where registering a "deeper" required component, then a
"shallower" required component, would result in the wrong required
constructor being used for the root component.
## Solution
- Make `register_required_components` add any "parent" of a component as
`required_by` to the new "child".
- Assign the depth of the `requiree` plus 1 as the depth of a new
runtime required component.
## Testing
- Added two new tests.
# Objective
Fixes#16406.
Currently, the `#[require(...)]` attribute internally registers
component requirements using `register_required_components_manual`. This
is done recursively in a way where every requirement in the "inheritance
tree" is added into a flat `RequiredComponents` hash map with component
constructors and inheritance depths stored.
However, this does not consider runtime requirements: if a plugins has
already registered `C` as required by `B`, and a component `A` requires
`B` through the macro attribute, spawning an entity with `A` won't add
`C`. The `required_by` hash set for `C` doesn't have `A`, and the
`RequiredComponents` of `A` don't have `C`.
Intuitively, I would've thought that the macro attribute's requirements
were always added *before* runtime requirements, and in that case I
believe this shouldn't have been an issue. But the macro requirements
are based on `Component::register_required_components`, which in a lot
of cases (I think) is only called *after* the first time a bundle with
the component is inserted. So if a runtime requirement is defined
*before* this (as is often the case, during `Plugin::build`), the macro
may not take it into account.
## Solution
Register requirements inherited from the `required` component in
`register_required_components_manual_unchecked`.
## Testing
I added a test, essentially the same as in #16406, and it now passes. I
also ran some of the tests in #16409, and they seem to work as expected.
All the existing tests for required components pass.
# Objective
After #12929 we no longer have methods to get component or ticks for
previously obtained table column.
It's possible to use a lower level API by indexing the slice, but then
it won't be possible to construct `ComponentTicks`.
## Solution
Make `ComponentTicks` fields public. They don't hold any invariants and
you can't get a mutable reference to the struct in Bevy.
I also removed the getters since they are no longer needed.
## Testing
- I tested the compilation
---
## Migration Guide
- Instead of using `ComponentTicks::last_changed_tick` and
`ComponentTicks::added_tick` methods, access fields directly.
# Objective
Allow required component default values to be provided in-line.
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
FocusPolicy(block_focus_policy)
)]
struct SomeComponent;
fn block_focus_policy() -> FocusPolicy {
FocusPolicy::Block
}
```
May now be expressed as:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
FocusPolicy(|| FocusPolicy::Block)
)]
struct SomeComponent;
```
## Solution
Modified the #[require] proc macro to accept a closure.
## Testing
Tested using my branch as a dependency, and switching between the inline
closure syntax and function syntax for a bunch of different components.
# Objective
Fixes#15367.
Currently, required components can only be defined through the `require`
macro attribute. While this should be used in most cases, there are also
several instances where you may want to define requirements at runtime,
commonly in plugins.
Example use cases:
- Require components only if the relevant optional plugins are enabled.
For example, a `SleepTimer` component (for physics) is only relevant if
the `SleepPlugin` is enabled.
- Third party crates can define their own requirements for first party
types. For example, "each `Handle<Mesh>` should require my custom
rendering data components". This also gets around the orphan rule.
- Generic plugins that add marker components based on the existence of
other components, like a generic `ColliderPlugin<C: AnyCollider>` that
wants to add a `ColliderMarker` component for all types of colliders.
- This is currently relevant for the retained render world in #15320.
The `ExtractComponentPlugin<C>` should add `SyncToRenderWorld` to all
components that should be extracted. This is currently done with
observers, which is more expensive than required components, and causes
archetype moves.
- Replace some built-in components with custom versions. For example, if
`GlobalTransform` required `Transform` through `TransformPlugin`, but we
wanted to use a `CustomTransform` type, we could replace
`TransformPlugin` with our own plugin. (This specific example isn't
good, but there are likely better use cases where this may be useful)
See #15367 for more in-depth reasoning.
## Solution
Add `register_required_components::<T, R>` and
`register_required_components_with::<T, R>` methods for `Default` and
custom constructors respectively. These methods exist on `App` and
`World`.
```rust
struct BirdPlugin;
impl Plugin for BirdPlugin {
fn plugin(app: &mut App) {
// Make `Bird` require `Wings` with a `Default` constructor.
app.register_required_components::<Bird, Wings>();
// Make `Wings` require `FlapSpeed` with a custom constructor.
// Fun fact: Some hummingbirds can flutter their wings 80 times per second!
app.register_required_components_with::<Wings, FlapSpeed>(|| FlapSpeed::from_duration(1.0 / 80.0));
}
}
```
The custom constructor is a function pointer to match the `require` API,
though it could take a raw value too.
Requirement inheritance works similarly as with the `require` attribute.
If `Bird` required `FlapSpeed` directly, it would take precedence over
indirectly requiring it through `Wings`. The same logic applies to all
levels of the inheritance tree.
Note that registering the same component requirement more than once will
panic, similarly to trying to add multiple component hooks of the same
type to the same component. This avoids constructor conflicts and
confusing ordering issues.
### Implementation
Runtime requirements have two additional challenges in comparison to the
`require` attribute.
1. The `require` attribute uses recursion and macros with clever
ordering to populate hash maps of required components for each component
type. The expected semantics are that "more specific" requirements
override ones deeper in the inheritance tree. However, at runtime, there
is no representation of how "specific" each requirement is.
2. If you first register the requirement `X -> Y`, and later register `Y
-> Z`, then `X` should also indirectly require `Z`. However, `Y` itself
doesn't know that it is required by `X`, so it's not aware that it
should update the list of required components for `X`.
My solutions to these problems are:
1. Store the depth in the inheritance tree for each entry of a given
component's `RequiredComponents`. This is used to determine how
"specific" each requirement is. For `require`-based registration, these
depths are computed as part of the recursion.
2. Store and maintain a `required_by` list in each component's
`ComponentInfo`, next to `required_components`. For `require`-based
registration, these are also added after each registration, as part of
the recursion.
When calling `register_required_components`, it works as follows:
1. Get the required components of `Foo`, and check that `Bar` isn't
already a *direct* requirement.
3. Register `Bar` as a required component for `Foo`, and add `Foo` to
the `required_by` list for `Bar`.
4. Find and register all indirect requirements inherited from `Bar`,
adding `Foo` to the `required_by` list for each component.
5. Iterate through components that require `Foo`, registering the new
inherited requires for them as indirect requirements.
The runtime registration is likely slightly more expensive than the
`require` version, but it is a one-time cost, and quite negligible in
practice, unless projects have hundreds or thousands of runtime
requirements. I have not benchmarked this however.
This does also add a small amount of extra cost to the `require`
attribute for updating `required_by` lists, but I expect it to be very
minor.
## Testing
I added some tests that are copies of the `require` versions, as well as
some tests that are more specific to the runtime implementation. I might
add a few more tests though.
## Discussion
- Is `register_required_components` a good name? Originally I went for
`register_component_requirement` to be consistent with
`register_component_hooks`, but the general feature is often referred to
as "required components", which is why I changed it to
`register_required_components`.
- Should we *not* panic for duplicate requirements? If so, should they
just be ignored, or should the latest registration overwrite earlier
ones?
- If we do want to panic for duplicate, conflicting registrations,
should we at least not panic if the registrations are *exactly* the
same, i.e. same component and same constructor? The current
implementation panics for all duplicate direct registrations regardless
of the constructor.
## Next Steps
- Allow `register_required_components` to take a `Bundle` instead of a
single required component.
- I could also try to do it in this PR if that would be preferable.
- Not directly related, but archetype invariants?
# Objective
- Fixes#6370
- Closes#6581
## Solution
- Added the following lints to the workspace:
- `std_instead_of_core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
## Migration Guide
The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.
## Notes
- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#15451
## Migration Guide
- `World::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`.
- `World::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to
`register_component_with_descriptor`.
- `World::init_bundle` has been renamed to `register_bundle`.
- `Components::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`.
- `Components::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to
`register_component_with_descriptor`.
- `Components::init_resource` has been renamed to `register_resource`.
- `Components::init_non_send` had been renamed to `register_non_send`.
Enabled `check-private-items` in `clippy.toml` and then fixed the
resulting errors. Most of these were simply misformatted and of the
remaining:
- ~Added `#[allow(clippy::missing_safety_doc)]` to~ Removed unsafe from
a pair of functions in `bevy_utils/futures` which are only unsafe so
that they can be passed to a function which requires `unsafe fn`
- Removed `unsafe` from `UnsafeWorldCell::observers` as from what I can
tell it is always safe like `components`, `bundles` etc. (this should be
checked)
- Added safety docs to:
- `Bundles::get_storage_unchecked`: Based on the function that writes to
`dynamic_component_storages`
- `Bundles::get_storages_unchecked`: Based on the function that writes
to `dynamic_bundle_storages`
- `QueryIterationCursor::init_empty`: Duplicated from `init`
- `QueryIterationCursor::peek_last`: Thanks Giooschi (also added
internal unsafe blocks)
- `tests::drop_ptr`: Moved safety comment out to the doc string
This lint would also apply to `missing_errors_doc`, `missing_panics_doc`
and `unnecessary_safety_doc` if we chose to enable any of those at some
point, although there is an open
[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13074) to
separate these options.
## Introduction
This is the first step in my [Next Generation Scene / UI
Proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437).
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7272#14800.
Bevy's current Bundles as the "unit of construction" hamstring the UI
user experience and have been a pain point in the Bevy ecosystem
generally when composing scenes:
* They are an additional _object defining_ concept, which must be
learned separately from components. Notably, Bundles _are not present at
runtime_, which is confusing and limiting.
* They can completely erase the _defining component_ during Bundle init.
For example, `ButtonBundle { style: Style::default(), ..default() }`
_makes no mention_ of the `Button` component symbol, which is what makes
the Entity a "button"!
* They are not capable of representing "dependency inheritance" without
completely non-viable / ergonomically crushing nested bundles. This
limitation is especially painful in UI scenarios, but it applies to
everything across the board.
* They introduce a bunch of additional nesting when defining scenes,
making them ugly to look at
* They introduce component name "stutter": `SomeBundle { component_name:
ComponentName::new() }`
* They require copious sprinklings of `..default()` when spawning them
in Rust code, due to the additional layer of nesting
**Required Components** solve this by allowing you to define which
components a given component needs, and how to construct those
components when they aren't explicitly provided.
This is what a `ButtonBundle` looks like with Bundles (the current
approach):
```rust
#[derive(Component, Default)]
struct Button;
#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct ButtonBundle {
pub button: Button,
pub node: Node,
pub style: Style,
pub interaction: Interaction,
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
pub border_color: BorderColor,
pub border_radius: BorderRadius,
pub image: UiImage,
pub transform: Transform,
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
pub visibility: Visibility,
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
pub z_index: ZIndex,
}
commands.spawn(ButtonBundle {
style: Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
height: Val::Px(50.0),
..default()
},
focus_policy: FocusPolicy::Block,
..default()
})
```
And this is what it looks like with Required Components:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(Node, UiImage)]
struct Button;
commands.spawn((
Button,
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
height: Val::Px(50.0),
..default()
},
FocusPolicy::Block,
));
```
With Required Components, we mention only the most relevant components.
Every component required by `Node` (ex: `Style`, `FocusPolicy`, etc) is
automatically brought in!
### Efficiency
1. At insertion/spawn time, Required Components (including recursive
required components) are initialized and inserted _as if they were
manually inserted alongside the given components_. This means that this
is maximally efficient: there are no archetype or table moves.
2. Required components are only initialized and inserted if they were
not manually provided by the developer. For the code example in the
previous section, because `Style` and `FocusPolicy` are inserted
manually, they _will not_ be initialized and inserted as part of the
required components system. Efficient!
3. The "missing required components _and_ constructors needed for an
insertion" are cached in the "archetype graph edge", meaning they aren't
computed per-insertion. When a component is inserted, the "missing
required components" list is iterated (and that graph edge (AddBundle)
is actually already looked up for us during insertion, because we need
that for "normal" insert logic too).
### IDE Integration
The `#[require(SomeComponent)]` macro has been written in such a way
that Rust Analyzer can provide type-inspection-on-hover and `F12` /
go-to-definition for required components.
### Custom Constructors
The `require` syntax expects a `Default` constructor by default, but it
can be overridden with a custom constructor:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
Node,
Style(button_style),
UiImage
)]
struct Button;
fn button_style() -> Style {
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
..default()
}
}
```
### Multiple Inheritance
You may have noticed by now that this behaves a bit like "multiple
inheritance". One of the problems that this presents is that it is
possible to have duplicate requires for a given type at different levels
of the inheritance tree:
```rust
#[derive(Component)
struct X(usize);
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(X(x1))
struct Y;
fn x1() -> X {
X(1)
}
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
Y,
X(x2),
)]
struct Z;
fn x2() -> X {
X(2)
}
// What version of X is inserted for Z?
commands.spawn(Z);
```
This is allowed (and encouraged), although this doesn't appear to occur
much in practice. First: only one version of `X` is initialized and
inserted for `Z`. In the case above, I think we can all probably agree
that it makes the most sense to use the `x2` constructor for `X`,
because `Y`'s `x1` constructor exists "beneath" `Z` in the inheritance
hierarchy; `Z`'s constructor is "more specific".
The algorithm is simple and predictable:
1. Use all of the constructors (including default constructors) directly
defined in the spawned component's require list
2. In the order the requires are defined in `#[require()]`, recursively
visit the require list of each of the components in the list (this is a
depth Depth First Search). When a constructor is found, it will only be
used if one has not already been found.
From a user perspective, just think about this as the following:
1. Specifying a required component constructor for `Foo` directly on a
spawned component `Bar` will result in that constructor being used (and
overriding existing constructors lower in the inheritance tree). This is
the classic "inheritance override" behavior people expect.
2. For cases where "multiple inheritance" results in constructor
clashes, Components should be listed in "importance order". List a
component earlier in the requirement list to initialize its inheritance
tree earlier.
Required Components _does_ generally result in a model where component
values are decoupled from each other at construction time. Notably, some
existing Bundle patterns use bundle constructors to initialize multiple
components with shared state. I think (in general) moving away from this
is necessary:
1. It allows Required Components (and the Scene system more generally)
to operate according to simple rules
2. The "do arbitrary init value sharing in Bundle constructors" approach
_already_ causes data consistency problems, and those problems would be
exacerbated in the context of a Scene/UI system. For cases where shared
state is truly necessary, I think we are better served by observers /
hooks.
3. If a situation _truly_ needs shared state constructors (which should
be rare / generally discouraged), Bundles are still there if they are
needed.
## Next Steps
* **Require Construct-ed Components**: I have already implemented this
(as defined in the [Next Generation Scene / UI
Proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437). However
I've removed `Construct` support from this PR, as that has not landed
yet. Adding this back in requires relatively minimal changes to the
current impl, and can be done as part of a future Construct pr.
* **Port Built-in Bundles to Required Components**: This isn't something
we should do right away. It will require rethinking our public
interfaces, which IMO should be done holistically after the rest of Next
Generation Scene / UI lands. I think we should merge this PR first and
let people experiment _inside their own code with their own Components_
while we wait for the rest of the new scene system to land.
* **_Consider_ Automatic Required Component Removal**: We should
evaluate _if_ automatic Required Component removal should be done. Ex:
if all components that explicitly require a component are removed,
automatically remove that component. This issue has been explicitly
deferred in this PR, as I consider the insertion behavior to be
desirable on its own (and viable on its own). I am also doubtful that we
can find a design that has behavior we actually want. Aka: can we
_really_ distinguish between a component that is "only there because it
was automatically inserted" and "a component that was necessary / should
be kept". See my [discussion response
here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437#discussioncomment-10268668)
for more details.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pascal Hertleif <killercup@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#14202
## Solution
Add `on_replaced` component hook and `OnReplaced` observer trigger
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Updated & added unit tests
---
## Changelog
- Added new `on_replaced` component hook and `OnReplaced` observer
trigger for performing cleanup on component values when they are
overwritten with `.insert()`
# Objective
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/13972
## Solution
Added 3 new attributes to the `Component` macro.
## Testing
Added `component_hook_order_spawn_despawn_with_macro_hooks`, that makes
the same as `component_hook_order_spawn_despawn` but uses a struct, that
defines it's hooks with the `Component` macro.
---
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
…izer (#13442)"
This reverts commit 5cfb063d4a.
- This PR broke bevy-trait-query, which needs to be able to write a
resource in init_state. See #13798 for more details.
- Note this doesn't fix everything as transmutes for bevy-trait-query
will still be broken,. But the current usage in that crate is UB, so we
need to find another solution.
# Objective
In #13343, `WorldQuery::get_state` was constrained from `&World` as the
argument to `&Components`, but `WorldQuery::init_state` hasn't yet been
changed from `&mut World` to match.
Fixes#13358
## Solution
Create a wrapper around `&mut Components` and `&mut Storages` that can
be obtained from `&mut World` with a `component_initializer` method.
This new `ComponentInitializer` re-exposes the API on `&mut Components`
minus the `&mut Storages` parameter where it was present. For the
`&Components` API, it simply derefs to its `components` field.
## Changelog
### Added
The `World::component_initializer` method.
The `ComponentInitializer` struct that re-exposes `Components` API.
### Changed
`WorldQuery::init_state` now takes `&mut ComponentInitializer` instead
of `&mut World`.
## Migration Guide
Instead of passing `&mut World` to `WorldQuery::init_state` directly,
pass in a mutable reference to the struct returned from
`World::component_initializer`.
# Objective
While reviewing the other open hooks-related PRs, I found that the docs
on the `ComponentHooks` struct itself didn't give enough information
about how and why the feature could be used.
## Solution
1. Clean up the docs to add additional context.
2. Add a doc test demonstrating simple usage.
## Testing
The doc test passes locally.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecil@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#12377
## Solution
Added simple `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented(...)]` attributes to some
critical public traits providing a more approachable initial error
message. Where appropriate, a `note` is added indicating that a `derive`
macro is available.
## Examples
<details>
<summary>Examples hidden for brevity</summary>
Below is a collection of examples showing the new error messages
produced by this change. In general, messages will start with a more
Bevy-centric error message (e.g., _`MyComponent` is not a `Component`_),
and a note directing the user to an available derive macro where
appropriate.
### Missing `#[derive(Resource)]`
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
struct MyResource;
fn main() {
App::new()
.insert_resource(MyResource)
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `MyResource` is not a `Resource`
--> examples/app/empty.rs:7:26
|
7 | .insert_resource(MyResource)
| --------------- ^^^^^^^^^^ invalid `Resource`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= help: the trait `Resource` is not implemented for `MyResource`
= note: consider annotating `MyResource` with `#[derive(Resource)]`
= help: the following other types implement trait `Resource`:
AccessibilityRequested
ManageAccessibilityUpdates
bevy::bevy_a11y::Focus
DiagnosticsStore
FrameCount
bevy::prelude::State<S>
SystemInfo
bevy::prelude::Axis<T>
and 141 others
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::insert_resource`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:419:31
|
419 | pub fn insert_resource<R: Resource>(&mut self, resource: R) -> &mut Self {
| ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::insert_resource`
```
</details>
### Putting A `QueryData` in a `QueryFilter` Slot
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct A;
#[derive(Component)]
struct B;
fn my_system(_query: Query<&A, &B>) {}
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_systems(Update, my_system)
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `&B` is not a valid `Query` filter
--> examples/app/empty.rs:9:22
|
9 | fn my_system(_query: Query<&A, &B>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid `Query` filter
|
= help: the trait `QueryFilter` is not implemented for `&B`
= help: the following other types implement trait `QueryFilter`:
With<T>
Without<T>
bevy::prelude::Or<()>
bevy::prelude::Or<(F0,)>
bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1)>
bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1, F2)>
bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1, F2, F3)>
bevy::prelude::Or<(F0, F1, F2, F3, F4)>
and 28 others
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::Query`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\query.rs:349:51
|
349 | pub struct Query<'world, 'state, D: QueryData, F: QueryFilter = ()> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Query`
```
</details>
### Missing `#[derive(Component)]`
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
struct A;
fn my_system(mut commands: Commands) {
commands.spawn(A);
}
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_systems(Startup, my_system)
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `A` is not a `Bundle`
--> examples/app/empty.rs:6:20
|
6 | commands.spawn(A);
| ----- ^ invalid `Bundle`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= help: the trait `bevy::prelude::Component` is not implemented for `A`, which is required by `A: Bundle`
= note: consider annotating `A` with `#[derive(Component)]` or `#[derive(Bundle)]`
= help: the following other types implement trait `Bundle`:
TransformBundle
SceneBundle
DynamicSceneBundle
AudioSourceBundle<Source>
SpriteBundle
SpriteSheetBundle
Text2dBundle
MaterialMesh2dBundle<M>
and 34 others
= note: required for `A` to implement `Bundle`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::Commands::<'w, 's>::spawn`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\commands\mod.rs:243:21
|
243 | pub fn spawn<T: Bundle>(&mut self, bundle: T) -> EntityCommands {
| ^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Commands::<'w, 's>::spawn`
```
</details>
### Missing `#[derive(Asset)]`
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
struct A;
fn main() {
App::new()
.init_asset::<A>()
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `A` is not an `Asset`
--> examples/app/empty.rs:7:23
|
7 | .init_asset::<A>()
| ---------- ^ invalid `Asset`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= help: the trait `Asset` is not implemented for `A`
= note: consider annotating `A` with `#[derive(Asset)]`
= help: the following other types implement trait `Asset`:
Font
AnimationGraph
DynamicScene
Scene
AudioSource
Pitch
bevy::bevy_gltf::Gltf
GltfNode
and 17 others
note: required by a bound in `init_asset`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_asset\src\lib.rs:307:22
|
307 | fn init_asset<A: Asset>(&mut self) -> &mut Self;
| ^^^^^ required by this bound in `AssetApp::init_asset`
```
</details>
### Mismatched Input and Output on System Piping
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
fn producer() -> u32 {
123
}
fn consumer(_: In<u16>) {}
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_systems(Update, producer.pipe(consumer))
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `fn(bevy::prelude::In<u16>) {consumer}` is not a valid system with input `u32` and output `_`
--> examples/app/empty.rs:11:44
|
11 | .add_systems(Update, producer.pipe(consumer))
| ---- ^^^^^^^^ invalid system
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= help: the trait `bevy::prelude::IntoSystem<u32, _, _>` is not implemented for fn item `fn(bevy::prelude::In<u16>) {consumer}`
= note: expecting a system which consumes `u32` and produces `_`
note: required by a bound in `pipe`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\mod.rs:168:12
|
166 | fn pipe<B, Final, MarkerB>(self, system: B) -> PipeSystem<Self::System, B::System>
| ---- required by a bound in this associated function
167 | where
168 | B: IntoSystem<Out, Final, MarkerB>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `IntoSystem::pipe`
```
</details>
### Missing Reflection
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
struct MyComponent;
fn main() {
App::new()
.register_type::<MyComponent>()
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `MyComponent` does not provide type registration information
--> examples/app/empty.rs:8:26
|
8 | .register_type::<MyComponent>()
| ------------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `GetTypeRegistration` is not implemented for `MyComponent`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: consider annotating `MyComponent` with `#[derive(Reflect)]`
= help: the following other types implement trait `GetTypeRegistration`:
bool
char
isize
i8
i16
i32
i64
i128
and 443 others
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::register_type`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:619:29
|
619 | pub fn register_type<T: bevy_reflect::GetTypeRegistration>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::register_type`
```
</details>
### Missing `#[derive(States)]` Implementation
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Default, Eq, PartialEq, Hash)]
enum AppState {
#[default]
Menu,
InGame {
paused: bool,
turbo: bool,
},
}
fn main() {
App::new()
.init_state::<AppState>()
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: the trait bound `AppState: FreelyMutableState` is not satisfied
--> examples/app/empty.rs:15:23
|
15 | .init_state::<AppState>()
| ---------- ^^^^^^^^ the trait `FreelyMutableState` is not implemented for `AppState`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: consider annotating `AppState` with `#[derive(States)]`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::init_state`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:282:26
|
282 | pub fn init_state<S: FreelyMutableState + FromWorld>(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::init_state`
```
</details>
### Adding a `System` with Unhandled Output
<details>
<summary>Example Code</summary>
```rust
use bevy::prelude::*;
fn producer() -> u32 {
123
}
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_systems(Update, consumer)
.run();
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error Generated</summary>
```error
error[E0277]: `fn() -> u32 {producer}` does not describe a valid system configuration
--> examples/app/empty.rs:9:30
|
9 | .add_systems(Update, producer)
| ----------- ^^^^^^^^ invalid system configuration
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= help: the trait `IntoSystem<(), (), _>` is not implemented for fn item `fn() -> u32 {producer}`, which is required by `fn() -> u32 {producer}: IntoSystemConfigs<_>`
= help: the following other types implement trait `IntoSystemConfigs<Marker>`:
<Box<(dyn bevy::prelude::System<In = (), Out = ()> + 'static)> as IntoSystemConfigs<()>>
<NodeConfigs<Box<(dyn bevy::prelude::System<In = (), Out = ()> + 'static)>> as IntoSystemConfigs<()>>
<(S0,) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0)>>
<(S0, S1) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1)>>
<(S0, S1, S2) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2)>>
<(S0, S1, S2, S3) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2, P3)>>
<(S0, S1, S2, S3, S4) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2, P3, P4)>>
<(S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5) as IntoSystemConfigs<(SystemConfigTupleMarker, P0, P1, P2, P3, P4, P5)>>
and 14 others
= note: required for `fn() -> u32 {producer}` to implement `IntoSystemConfigs<_>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::add_systems`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:342:23
|
339 | pub fn add_systems<M>(
| ----------- required by a bound in this associated function
...
342 | systems: impl IntoSystemConfigs<M>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::add_systems`
```
</details>
</details>
## Testing
CI passed locally.
## Migration Guide
Upgrade to version 1.78 (or higher) of Rust.
## Future Work
- Currently, hints are not supported in this diagnostic. Ideally,
suggestions like _"consider using ..."_ would be in a hint rather than a
note, but that is the best option for now.
- System chaining and other `all_tuples!(...)`-based traits have bad
error messages due to the slightly different error message format.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jamie Ridding <Themayu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Improve performance scalability when adding new event types to a Bevy
app. Currently, just using Bevy in the default configuration, all apps
spend upwards of 100+us in the `First` schedule, every app tick,
evaluating if it should update events or not, even if events are not
being used for that particular frame, and this scales with the number of
Events registered in the app.
## Solution
As `Events::update` is guaranteed `O(1)` by just checking if a
resource's value, swapping two Vecs, and then clearing one of them, the
actual cost of running `event_update_system` is *very* cheap. The
overhead of doing system dependency injection, task scheduling ,and the
multithreaded executor outweighs the cost of running the system by a
large margin.
Create an `EventRegistry` resource that keeps a number of function
pointers that update each event. Replace the per-event type
`event_update_system` with a singular exclusive system uses the
`EventRegistry` to update all events instead. Update `SubApp::add_event`
to use `EventRegistry` instead.
## Performance
This speeds reduces the cost of the `First` schedule in both many_foxes
and many_cubes by over 80%. Note this is with system spans on. The
majority of this is now context-switching costs from launching
`time_system`, which should be mostly eliminated with #12869.
The actual `event_update_system` is usually *very* short, using only a
few microseconds on average.
---
## Changelog
TODO
## Migration Guide
TODO
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
When doing a final pass for #3362, it appeared that `ComponentStorage`
as a trait, the two types implementing it, and the associated type on
`Component` aren't really necessary anymore. This likely was due to an
earlier constraint on the use of consts in traits, but that definitely
doesn't seem to be a problem in Rust 1.76.
## Solution
Remove them.
---
## Changelog
Changed: `Component::Storage` has been replaced with
`Component::STORAGE_TYPE` as a const.
Removed: `bevy::ecs::component::ComponentStorage` trait
Removed: `bevy::ecs::component::TableStorage` struct
Removed: `bevy::ecs::component::SparseSetStorage` struct
## Migration Guide
If you were manually implementing `Component` instead of using the
derive macro, replace the associated `Storage` associated type with the
`STORAGE_TYPE` const:
```rust
// in Bevy 0.13
impl Component for MyComponent {
type Storage = TableStorage;
}
// in Bevy 0.14
impl Component for MyComponent {
const STORAGE_TYPE: StorageType = StorageType::Table;
}
```
Component is no longer object safe. If you were relying on `&dyn
Component`, `Box<dyn Component>`, etc. please [file an issue
](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues) to get [this
change](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/12311) reverted.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fix mismatch between the `Component` trait method and the `World`
method.
## Solution
- Replace init_component_info with register_component_hooks.
# Objective
- Provide a reliable and performant mechanism to allows users to keep
components synchronized with external sources: closing/opening sockets,
updating indexes, debugging etc.
- Implement a generic mechanism to provide mutable access to the world
without allowing structural changes; this will not only be used here but
is a foundational piece for observers, which are key for a performant
implementation of relations.
## Solution
- Implement a new type `DeferredWorld` (naming is not important,
`StaticWorld` is also suitable) that wraps a world pointer and prevents
user code from making any structural changes to the ECS; spawning
entities, creating components, initializing resources etc.
- Add component lifecycle hooks `on_add`, `on_insert` and `on_remove`
that can be assigned callbacks in user code.
---
## Changelog
- Add new `DeferredWorld` type.
- Add new world methods: `register_component::<T>` and
`register_component_with_descriptor`. These differ from `init_component`
in that they provide mutable access to the created `ComponentInfo` but
will panic if the component is already in any archetypes. These
restrictions serve two purposes:
1. Prevent users from defining hooks for components that may already
have associated hooks provided in another plugin. (a use case better
served by observers)
2. Ensure that when an `Archetype` is created it gets the appropriate
flags to early-out when triggering hooks.
- Add methods to `ComponentInfo`: `on_add`, `on_insert` and `on_remove`
to be used to register hooks of the form `fn(DeferredWorld, Entity,
ComponentId)`
- Modify `BundleInserter`, `BundleSpawner` and `EntityWorldMut` to
trigger component hooks when appropriate.
- Add bit flags to `Archetype` indicating whether or not any contained
components have each type of hook, this can be expanded for other flags
as needed.
- Add `component_hooks` example to illustrate usage. Try it out! It's
fun to mash keys.
## Safety
The changes to component insertion, removal and deletion involve a large
amount of unsafe code and it's fair for that to raise some concern. I
have attempted to document it as clearly as possible and have confirmed
that all the hooks examples are accepted by `cargo miri` as not causing
any undefined behavior. The largest issue is in ensuring there are no
outstanding references when passing a `DeferredWorld` to the hooks which
requires some use of raw pointers (as was already happening to some
degree in those places) and I have taken some time to ensure that is the
case but feel free to let me know if I've missed anything.
## Performance
These changes come with a small but measurable performance cost of
between 1-5% on `add_remove` benchmarks and between 1-3% on `insert`
benchmarks. One consideration to be made is the existence of the current
`RemovedComponents` which is on average more costly than the addition of
`on_remove` hooks due to the early-out, however hooks doesn't completely
remove the need for `RemovedComponents` as there is a chance you want to
respond to the removal of a component that already has an `on_remove`
hook defined in another plugin, so I have not removed it here. I do
intend to deprecate it with the introduction of observers in a follow up
PR.
## Discussion Questions
- Currently `DeferredWorld` implements `Deref` to `&World` which makes
sense conceptually, however it does cause some issues with rust-analyzer
providing autocomplete for `&mut World` references which is annoying.
There are alternative implementations that may address this but involve
more code churn so I have attempted them here. The other alternative is
to not implement `Deref` at all but that leads to a large amount of API
duplication.
- `DeferredWorld`, `StaticWorld`, something else?
- In adding support for hooks to `EntityWorldMut` I encountered some
unfortunate difficulties with my desired API. If commands are flushed
after each call i.e. `world.spawn() // flush commands .insert(A) //
flush commands` the entity may be despawned while `EntityWorldMut` still
exists which is invalid. An alternative was then to add
`self.world.flush_commands()` to the drop implementation for
`EntityWorldMut` but that runs into other problems for implementing
functions like `into_unsafe_entity_cell`. For now I have implemented a
`.flush()` which will flush the commands and consume `EntityWorldMut` or
users can manually run `world.flush_commands()` after using
`EntityWorldMut`.
- In order to allowing querying on a deferred world we need
implementations of `WorldQuery` to not break our guarantees of no
structural changes through their `UnsafeWorldCell`. All our
implementations do this, but there isn't currently any safety
documentation specifying what is or isn't allowed for an implementation,
just for the caller, (they also shouldn't be aliasing components they
didn't specify access for etc.) is that something we should start doing?
(see 10752)
Please check out the example `component_hooks` or the tests in
`bundle.rs` for usage examples. I will continue to expand this
description as I go.
See #10839 for a more ergonomic API built on top of this one that isn't
subject to the same restrictions and supports `SystemParam` dependency
injection.
# Objective
- Part of #11590
- Fix `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` for trivial cases in bevy_ecs
## Solution
Fix `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` in bevy_ecs for trivial cases, i.e., add an
`unsafe` block when the safety comment already exists or add a comment
like "The invariants are uphold by the caller".
---------
Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com>
Use `TypeIdMap<T>` instead of `HashMap<TypeId, T>`
- ~~`TypeIdMap` was in `bevy_ecs`. I've kept it there because of
#11478~~
- ~~I haven't swapped `bevy_reflect` over because it doesn't depend on
`bevy_ecs`, but I'd also be happy with moving `TypeIdMap` to
`bevy_utils` and then adding a dependency to that~~
- ~~this is a slight change in the public API of
`DrawFunctionsInternal`, does this need to go in the changelog?~~
## Changelog
- moved `TypeIdMap` to `bevy_utils`
- changed `DrawFunctionsInternal::indices` to `TypeIdMap`
## Migration Guide
- `TypeIdMap` now lives in `bevy_utils`
- `DrawFunctionsInternal::indices` now uses a `TypeIdMap`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Deriving `Reflect` for some public ChangeDetection/Tick structs in
bevy_ecs
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bournhonesque <cbournhonesque@snapchat.com>
# Objective
There are a lot of doctests that are `ignore`d for no documented reason.
And that should be fixed.
## Solution
I searched the bevy repo with the regex ` ```[a-z,]*ignore ` in order to
find all `ignore`d doctests. For each one of the `ignore`d doctests, I
did the following steps:
1. Attempt to remove the `ignored` attribute while still passing the
test. I did this by adding hidden dummy structs and imports.
2. If step 1 doesn't work, attempt to replace the `ignored` attribute
with the `no_run` attribute while still passing the test.
3. If step 2 doesn't work, keep the `ignored` attribute but add
documentation for why the `ignored` attribute was added.
---------
Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Shorten paths by removing unnecessary prefixes
## Solution
- Remove the prefixes from many paths which do not need them. Finding
the paths was done automatically using built-in refactoring tools in
Jetbrains RustRover.
# Objective
- Updates for rust 1.73
## Solution
- new doc check for `redundant_explicit_links`
- updated to text for compile fail tests
---
## Changelog
- updates for rust 1.73
# Objective
Occasionally, it is useful to pull `ComponentInfo` or
`ComponentDescriptor` out of the `Components` collection so that they
can be inspected without borrowing the whole `World`.
## Solution
Make `ComponentInfo` and `ComponentDescriptor` `Clone`, so that
reflection-heavy code can store them in a side table.
---
## Changelog
- Implement `Clone` for `ComponentInfo` and `ComponentDescriptor`
# Objective
- When reading API docs and seeing a reference to `ComponentId`, it
isn't immediately clear how to get one from your `Component`. It could
be made to be more clear.
## Solution
- Improve cross-linking of docs about `ComponentId`
# Objective
- Remove need to call `.get()` on two ticks to compare them for
equality.
## Solution
- Derive `Eq` and `PartialEq`.
---
## Changelog
> `Tick` now implements `Eq` and `PartialEq`
