This commit adds two new `WorldQuery` types: `EntityRefExcept` and
`EntityMutExcept`. These types work just like `EntityRef` and
`EntityMut`, but they prevent access to a statically-specified list of
components. For example, `EntityMutExcept<(AnimationPlayer,
Handle<AnimationGraph>)>` provides mutable access to all components
except for `AnimationPlayer` and `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. These types
are useful when you need to be able to process arbitrary queries while
iterating over the results of another `EntityMut` query.
The motivating use case is *generalized animation*, which is an upcoming
feature that allows animation of any component property, not just
rotation, translation, scaling, or morph weights. To implement this, we
must change the current `AnyOf<(&mut Transform, &mut MorphWeights)>` to
instead be `EntityMutExcept<(AnimationPlayer, Handle<AnimationGraph>)>`.
It's possible to use `FilteredEntityMut` in conjunction with a
dynamically-generated system instead, but `FilteredEntityMut` isn't
optimized for the use case of a large number of allowed components
coupled with a small set of disallowed components. No amount of
optimization of `FilteredEntityMut` produced acceptable performance on
the `many_foxes` benchmark. `Query<EntityMut, Without<AnimationPlayer>>`
will not suffice either, as it's legal and idiomatic for an
`AnimationTarget` and an `AnimationPlayer` to coexist on the same
entity.
An alternate proposal was to implement a somewhat-more-general
`Except<Q, CL>` feature, where Q is a `WorldQuery` and CL is a
`ComponentList`. I wasn't able to implement that proposal in a
reasonable way, because of the fact that methods like
`EntityMut::get_mut` and `EntityRef::get` are inherent methods instead
of methods on `WorldQuery`, and therefore there was no way to delegate
methods like `get` and `get_mut` to the inner query in a generic way.
Refactoring those methods into a trait would probably be possible.
However, I didn't see a use case for a hypothetical `Except` with
arbitrary queries: `Query<Except<(&Transform, &Visibility),
Visibility>>` would just be a complicated equivalent to
`Query<&Transform>`, for instance. So, out of a desire for simplicity, I
omitted a generic `Except` mechanism.
I've tested the performance of generalized animation on `many_foxes` and
found that, with this patch, `animate_targets` has a 7.4% slowdown over
`main`. With `FilteredEntityMut` optimized to use `Arc<Access>`, the
slowdown is 75.6%, due to contention on the reference count. Without
`Arc<Access>`, the slowdown is even worse, over 2x.
## Testing
New tests have been added that check that `EntityRefExcept` and
`EntityMutExcept` allow and disallow access to components properly and
that the query engine can correctly reject conflicting queries involving
those types.
A Tracy profile of `many_foxes` with 10,000 foxes showing generalized
animation using `FilteredEntityMut` (red) vs. main (yellow) is as
follows:
A Tracy profile of `many_foxes` with 10,000 foxes showing generalized
animation using this `EntityMutExcept` (yellow) vs. main (red) is as
follows:
# Objective
- Fixes#15106
## Solution
- Trivial refactor to rename the method. The duplicate method `push` was
removed as well. This will simpify the API and make the semantics more
clear. `Add` implies that the action happens immediately, whereas in
reality, the command is queued to be run eventually.
- `ChildBuilder::add_command` has similarly been renamed to
`queue_command`.
## Testing
Unit tests should suffice for this simple refactor.
---
## Migration Guide
- `Commands::add` and `Commands::push` have been replaced with
`Commnads::queue`.
- `ChildBuilder::add_command` has been renamed to
`ChildBuilder::queue_command`.
# Objective
Currently the resource doesn't get dropped if thread panics. This is
presumably to prevent !SEND resource from being dropped by wrong thread.
But, this logic is not needed for SEND resources. So we don't need this
check for SEND resource.
Fixes#15144
## Solution
We check if resource is !SEND before, validating that correct thread is
dropping the resource.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
I did run cargo test on bevy.
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
No
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
Nothing special
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
x86_64 desktop
# Objective
- Fixes#15236
## Solution
- Use bevy_math::ops instead of std floating point operations.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
Unit tests and `cargo run -p ci -- test`
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
Execute `cargo run -p ci -- test` on Windows.
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
Windows
## Migration Guide
- Not a breaking change
- Projects should use bevy math where applicable
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: IQuick 143 <IQuick143cz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joona Aalto <jondolf.dev@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Adds the missing API commands `insert_if_new_and` and
`try_insert_if_new_and` (resolves#15105)
- Adds some test coverage for existing insert commands
## Testing
- Implemented additional unit tests to add coverage
# Objective
Right now, `DynSystemParam::downcast()` always requires the type
parameter to be specified with a turbofish. Make it so that it can be
inferred from the use of the return value, like:
```rust
fn expects_res_a(mut param: DynSystemParam) {
let res: Res<A> = param.downcast().unwrap();
}
```
## Solution
The reason this doesn't currently work is that the type parameter is a
`'static` version of the `SystemParam` so that it can be used with
`Any::downcast_mut()`. Change the method signature so that the type
parameter matches the return type, and use `T::Item<'static, 'static>`
to get the `'static` version. That means we wind up returning a
`T::Item<'static, 'static>::Item<'w, 's>`, so constrain that to be equal
to `T`. That works with every `SystemParam` implementation, since they
have `T::Item == T` up to lifetimes.
# Objective
- fix#12853
- Make `Table::allocate` faster
## Solution
The PR consists of multiple steps:
1) For the component data: create a new data-structure that's similar to
`BlobVec` but doesn't store `len` & `capacity` inside of it: "BlobArray"
(name suggestions welcome)
2) For the `Tick` data: create a new data-structure that's similar to
`ThinSlicePtr` but supports dynamic reallocation: "ThinArrayPtr" (name
suggestions welcome)
3) Create a new data-structure that's very similar to `Column` that
doesn't store `len` & `capacity` inside of it: "ThinColumn"
4) Adjust the `Table` implementation to use `ThinColumn` instead of
`Column`
The result is that only one set of `len` & `capacity` is stored in
`Table`, in `Table::entities`
### Notes Regarding Performance
Apart from shaving off some excess memory in `Table`, the changes have
also brought noteworthy performance improvements:
The previous implementation relied on `Vec::reserve` &
`BlobVec::reserve`, but that redundantly repeated the same if statement
(`capacity` == `len`). Now that check could be made at the `Table` level
because the capacity and length of all the columns are synchronized;
saving N branches per allocation. The result is a respectable
performance improvement per every `Table::reserve` (and subsequently
`Table::allocate`) call.
I'm hesitant to give exact numbers because I don't have a lot of
experience in profiling and benchmarking, but these are the results I
got so far:
*`add_remove_big/table` benchmark after the implementation:*
*`add_remove_big/table` benchmark in main branch (measured in comparison
to the implementation):*
*`add_remove_very_big/table` benchmark after the implementation:*
*`add_remove_very_big/table` benchmark in main branch (measured in
comparison to the implementation):*
cc @james7132 to verify
---
## Changelog
- New data-structure that's similar to `BlobVec` but doesn't store `len`
& `capacity` inside of it: `BlobArray`
- New data-structure that's similar to `ThinSlicePtr` but supports
dynamic allocation:`ThinArrayPtr`
- New data-structure that's very similar to `Column` that doesn't store
`len` & `capacity` inside of it: `ThinColumn`
- Adjust the `Table` implementation to use `ThinColumn` instead of
`Column`
- New benchmark: `add_remove_very_big` to benchmark the performance of
spawning a lot of entities with a lot of components (15) each
## Migration Guide
`Table` now uses `ThinColumn` instead of `Column`. That means that
methods that previously returned `Column`, will now return `ThinColumn`
instead.
`ThinColumn` has a much more limited and low-level API, but you can
still achieve the same things in `ThinColumn` as you did in `Column`.
For example, instead of calling `Column::get_added_tick`, you'd call
`ThinColumn::get_added_ticks_slice` and index it to get the specific
added tick.
---------
Co-authored-by: James Liu <contact@jamessliu.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#14552
- Make the current note of `before` and `after` understandable.
- > The given set is not implicitly added to the schedule when this
system set is added.
## Solution
- Replace note in docs of [`after` and
`before`](https://docs.rs/bevy/latest/bevy/ecs/prelude/trait.IntoSystemConfigs.html#method.before)
- Note of after was removed completely, and links to `before`, because
they notes would be identical.
- Also encourage to use `.chain`, which is much simpler and safer to use
## Testing
- Checked the docs after running `cargo doc` and `cargo run -p ci --
lints`
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- no need to test, but please review the text. If it is still including
the intended message and especially if its understandable.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#14980
## Solution
Only iterate over archetypes containing the component.
## Alternatives
Additionally, for each archetype, cache how many observers are watching
one of its components & use this to speed up the check for each affected
archetype ([implemented
here](55c89aa033)).
Benchmarking showed this to lead only to a minor speedup.
## Testing
There's both already a test checking that observers don't run after
being despawned as well as a regression test for the bug that
necessitates the check this PR optimizes.
# Objective
- Finish resolving https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15125
- Inserting bundles was implemented in
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15128 but removing bundles still
needed to be implemented.
## Solution
- Modified `bevy_ecs::reflect::entity_commands::remove_reflect` to
handle both components and bundles
- Modified documentation of `ReflectCommandExt` methods to reflect that
one can now use bundles with these commands.
## Testing
- Three tests were added to match the ones for inserting components.
# Objective
- Remove any ambiguity around how multiple `Observer` components work on
a single `Entity` by completely removing the concept.
- Fixes#15122
## Solution
- Removed type parameters from `Observer`, relying on a function pointer
to provide type information into the relevant aspects of running an
observer.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally.
- Checked `observers.rs` example continued to function as expected.
## Notes
This communicates to users of observers that only a single `Observer`
can be inserted onto an entity at a time within the established type
system. This has been achieved by erasing the type information from the
stored `ObserverSystem` and retrieving it again using a function
pointer. This has the downside of increasing the size of the `Observer`
component and increases the complexity of the observer runner. However,
this complexity was already present, and is in my opinion a worthwhile
tradeoff for the clearer user experience.
The other notable benefit is users no longer need to use the
`ObserverState` component to filter for `Observer` entities, and can
instead use `Observer` directly.
Technically this is a breaking change, since the type signature for
`Observer` has changed. However, it was so cumbersome to use that I
don't believe there are any instances in the wild of users directly
naming `Observer` types, instead relying on `ObserverState`, and the
methods provided by `App` and `World`. As can be seen in the diff, this
change had very little knock-on effects across Bevy.
## Migration Guide
If you filtered for observers using `Observer<A, B>`, instead filter for
an `Observer`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Smaller scoped version of #13375 without the `_mut` variants which
currently have unsoundness issues.
## Solution
Same as #13375, but without the `_mut` variants.
## Testing
- The same test from #13375 is reused.
---
## Migration Guide
- Renamed `FilteredEntityRef::components` to
`FilteredEntityRef::accessed_components` and
`FilteredEntityMut::components` to
`FilteredEntityMut::accessed_components`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Periwink <charlesbour@gmail.com>
# Objective
`EntityHash` and related types were moved from `bevy_utils` to
`bevy_ecs` in #11498, but seemed to have been accidentally reintroduced
a week later in #11707.
## Solution
Remove the old leftover code.
---
## Migration Guide
- Uses of `bevy::utils::{EntityHash, EntityHasher, EntityHashMap,
EntityHashSet}` now have to be imported from `bevy::ecs::entity`.
# Objective
It's possible to create UB using an implementation of `QueryFilter` that
performs mutable access, but that does not violate any documented safety
invariants.
This code:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
struct Foo(usize);
// This derive is a simple way to get a valid WorldQuery impl. The QueryData impl isn't used.
#[derive(QueryData)]
#[query_data(mutable)]
struct BadFilter<'w> {
foo: &'w mut Foo,
}
impl QueryFilter for BadFilter<'_> {
const IS_ARCHETYPAL: bool = false;
unsafe fn filter_fetch(
fetch: &mut Self::Fetch<'_>,
entity: Entity,
table_row: TableRow,
) -> bool {
// SAFETY: fetch and filter_fetch have the same safety requirements
let f: &mut usize = &mut unsafe { Self::fetch(fetch, entity, table_row) }.foo.0;
println!("Got &mut at {f:p}");
true
}
}
let mut world = World::new();
world.spawn(Foo(0));
world.run_system_once(|query: Query<&Foo, BadFilter>| {
let f: &usize = &query.iter().next().unwrap().0;
println!("Got & at {f:p}");
query.iter().next().unwrap();
println!("Still have & at {f:p}");
});
```
prints:
```
Got &mut at 0x1924b92dfb0
Got & at 0x1924b92dfb0
Got &mut at 0x1924b92dfb0
Still have & at 0x1924b92dfb0
```
Which means it had an `&` and `&mut` alive at the same time.
The only `unsafe` there is around `Self::fetch`, but I believe that call
correctly upholds the safety invariant, and matches what `Added` and
`Changed` do.
## Solution
Make `QueryFilter` an unsafe trait and document the requirement that the
`WorldQuery` implementation be read-only.
## Migration Guide
`QueryFilter` is now an `unsafe trait`. If you were manually
implementing it, you will need to verify that the `WorldQuery`
implementation is read-only and then add the `unsafe` keyword to the
`impl`.
# Objective
A previous issue describes the same problem: #14248.
This particular link was seemingly missed by #14276.
## Solution
- Search repo for `bevyengine.org/learn/errors/#`
- Remove `#`
- Verify link goes to right place
# Objective
- Crate-level prelude modules, such as `bevy_ecs::prelude`, are plagued
with inconsistency! Let's fix it!
## Solution
Format all preludes based on the following rules:
1. All preludes should have brief documentation in the format of:
> The _name_ prelude.
>
> This includes the most common types in this crate, re-exported for
your convenience.
2. All documentation should be outer, not inner. (`///` instead of
`//!`.)
3. No prelude modules should be annotated with `#[doc(hidden)]`. (Items
within them may, though I'm not sure why this was done.)
## Testing
- I manually searched for the term `mod prelude` and updated all
occurrences by hand. 🫠
---------
Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- follow of #14049 ,we could use it on our Parallel Iterator,this pr
also unified the used function in both regular iter and parallel
iterations.
## Performance
no performance regression for regular itertaion
3.5X faster in hybrid parallel iteraion,this number is far greater than
the benefits obtained in regular iteration(~1.81) because mutable
iterations on continuous memory can effectively reduce the cost of
mataining core cache coherence
# Objective
Make the documentation for `SystemParamBuilder` nicer by combining the
tuple implementations into a single line of documentation.
## Solution
Use `#[doc(fake_variadic)]` for `SystemParamBuilder` tuple impls.
(This got missed originally because #14050 and #14703 were open at the
same time.)
# Objective
- Fixes#14974
## Solution
- Replace all* instances of `NonZero*` with `NonZero<*>`
## Testing
- CI passed locally.
---
## Notes
Within the `bevy_reflect` implementations for `std` types,
`impl_reflect_value!()` will continue to use the type aliases instead,
as it inappropriately parses the concrete type parameter as a generic
argument. If the `ZeroablePrimitive` trait was stable, or the macro
could be modified to accept a finite list of types, then we could fully
migrate.
# Objective
- Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/14961
## Solution
- Check that the archetypes don't contain any other observed components
before unsetting their flags
## Testing
- I added a regression test: `observer_despawn_archetype_flags`
# Objective
Allow `SystemParamBuilder` implementations for custom system parameters
created using `#[derive(SystemParam)]`.
## Solution
Extend the derive macro to accept a `#[system_param(builder)]`
attribute. When present, emit a builder type with a field corresponding
to each field of the param.
## Example
```rust
#[derive(SystemParam)]
#[system_param(builder)]
struct CustomParam<'w, 's> {
query: Query<'w, 's, ()>,
local: Local<'s, usize>,
}
let system = (CustomParamBuilder {
local: LocalBuilder(100),
query: QueryParamBuilder::new(|builder| {
builder.with::<A>();
}),
},)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(|param: CustomParam| *param.local + param.query.iter().count());
```
# Objective
- Fixes#14860
## Solution
- Added a line of documentation to `FromWorld`'s trait definition
mention the `Default` blanket implementation.
- Added custom documentation to the `from_world` method for the
`Default` blanket implementation. This ensures when inspecting the
`from_world` function within an IDE, the tooltip will explicitly state
the `default()` method will be used for any `Default` types.
## Testing
- CI passes.
# Objective
When building a system from `SystemParamBuilder`s and defining the
system as a closure, the compiler should be able to infer the parameter
types from the builder types.
## Solution
Create methods for each arity that take an argument that implements both
`SystemParamFunction` as well as `FnMut(SystemParamItem<P>,...)`. The
explicit `FnMut` constraint will allow the compiler to infer the
necessary higher-ranked lifetimes along with the parameter types.
I wanted to show that this was possible, but I can't tell whether it's
worth the complexity. It requires a separate method for each arity,
which pollutes the docs a bit:
## Example
```rust
let system = (LocalBuilder(0u64), ParamBuilder::local::<u64>())
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(|a, b| *a + *b + 1);
```
# Objective
sending events tends to be low-frequency so ergonomics can be
prioritized over efficiency.
add `Commands::send_event` to send any type of event without needing a
writer in hand.
i don't know how we feel about these kind of ergonomic things, i add
this to all my projects and find it useful. adding `mut
this_particular_event_writer: EventWriter<ThisParticularEvent>` every
time i want to send something is unnecessarily cumbersome.
it also simplifies the "send and receive in the same system" pattern
significantly.
basic example before:
```rs
fn my_func(
q: Query<(Entity, &State)>,
mut damage_event_writer: EventWriter<DamageEvent>,
mut heal_event_writer: EventWriter<HealEvent>,
) {
for (entity, state) in q.iter() {
if let Some(damage) = state.get_damage() {
damage_event_writer.send(DamageEvent { entity, damage });
}
if let Some(heal) = state.get_heal() {
heal_event_writer.send(HealEvent { entity, heal });
}
}
}
```
basic example after:
```rs
import bevy::ecs::event::SendEventEx;
fn my_func(
mut commands: Commands,
q: Query<(Entity, &State)>,
) {
for (entity, state) in q.iter() {
if let Some(damage) = state.get_damage() {
commands.send_event(DamageEvent { entity, damage });
}
if let Some(heal) = state.get_heal() {
commands.send_event(HealEvent { entity, heal });
}
}
}
```
send/receive in the same system before:
```rs
fn send_and_receive_param_set(
mut param_set: ParamSet<(EventReader<DebugEvent>, EventWriter<DebugEvent>)>,
) {
// We must collect the events to resend, because we can't access the writer while we're iterating over the reader.
let mut events_to_resend = Vec::new();
// This is p0, as the first parameter in the `ParamSet` is the reader.
for event in param_set.p0().read() {
if event.resend_from_param_set {
events_to_resend.push(event.clone());
}
}
// This is p1, as the second parameter in the `ParamSet` is the writer.
for mut event in events_to_resend {
event.times_sent += 1;
param_set.p1().send(event);
}
}
```
after:
```rs
use bevy::ecs::event::SendEventEx;
fn send_via_commands_and_receive(
mut reader: EventReader<DebugEvent>,
mut commands: Commands,
) {
for event in reader.read() {
if event.resend_via_commands {
commands.send_event(DebugEvent {
times_sent: event.times_sent + 1,
..event.clone()
});
}
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
## Introduction
This is the first step in my [Next Generation Scene / UI
Proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437).
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/7272#14800.
Bevy's current Bundles as the "unit of construction" hamstring the UI
user experience and have been a pain point in the Bevy ecosystem
generally when composing scenes:
* They are an additional _object defining_ concept, which must be
learned separately from components. Notably, Bundles _are not present at
runtime_, which is confusing and limiting.
* They can completely erase the _defining component_ during Bundle init.
For example, `ButtonBundle { style: Style::default(), ..default() }`
_makes no mention_ of the `Button` component symbol, which is what makes
the Entity a "button"!
* They are not capable of representing "dependency inheritance" without
completely non-viable / ergonomically crushing nested bundles. This
limitation is especially painful in UI scenarios, but it applies to
everything across the board.
* They introduce a bunch of additional nesting when defining scenes,
making them ugly to look at
* They introduce component name "stutter": `SomeBundle { component_name:
ComponentName::new() }`
* They require copious sprinklings of `..default()` when spawning them
in Rust code, due to the additional layer of nesting
**Required Components** solve this by allowing you to define which
components a given component needs, and how to construct those
components when they aren't explicitly provided.
This is what a `ButtonBundle` looks like with Bundles (the current
approach):
```rust
#[derive(Component, Default)]
struct Button;
#[derive(Bundle, Default)]
struct ButtonBundle {
pub button: Button,
pub node: Node,
pub style: Style,
pub interaction: Interaction,
pub focus_policy: FocusPolicy,
pub border_color: BorderColor,
pub border_radius: BorderRadius,
pub image: UiImage,
pub transform: Transform,
pub global_transform: GlobalTransform,
pub visibility: Visibility,
pub inherited_visibility: InheritedVisibility,
pub view_visibility: ViewVisibility,
pub z_index: ZIndex,
}
commands.spawn(ButtonBundle {
style: Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
height: Val::Px(50.0),
..default()
},
focus_policy: FocusPolicy::Block,
..default()
})
```
And this is what it looks like with Required Components:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(Node, UiImage)]
struct Button;
commands.spawn((
Button,
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
height: Val::Px(50.0),
..default()
},
FocusPolicy::Block,
));
```
With Required Components, we mention only the most relevant components.
Every component required by `Node` (ex: `Style`, `FocusPolicy`, etc) is
automatically brought in!
### Efficiency
1. At insertion/spawn time, Required Components (including recursive
required components) are initialized and inserted _as if they were
manually inserted alongside the given components_. This means that this
is maximally efficient: there are no archetype or table moves.
2. Required components are only initialized and inserted if they were
not manually provided by the developer. For the code example in the
previous section, because `Style` and `FocusPolicy` are inserted
manually, they _will not_ be initialized and inserted as part of the
required components system. Efficient!
3. The "missing required components _and_ constructors needed for an
insertion" are cached in the "archetype graph edge", meaning they aren't
computed per-insertion. When a component is inserted, the "missing
required components" list is iterated (and that graph edge (AddBundle)
is actually already looked up for us during insertion, because we need
that for "normal" insert logic too).
### IDE Integration
The `#[require(SomeComponent)]` macro has been written in such a way
that Rust Analyzer can provide type-inspection-on-hover and `F12` /
go-to-definition for required components.
### Custom Constructors
The `require` syntax expects a `Default` constructor by default, but it
can be overridden with a custom constructor:
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
Node,
Style(button_style),
UiImage
)]
struct Button;
fn button_style() -> Style {
Style {
width: Val::Px(100.0),
..default()
}
}
```
### Multiple Inheritance
You may have noticed by now that this behaves a bit like "multiple
inheritance". One of the problems that this presents is that it is
possible to have duplicate requires for a given type at different levels
of the inheritance tree:
```rust
#[derive(Component)
struct X(usize);
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(X(x1))
struct Y;
fn x1() -> X {
X(1)
}
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(
Y,
X(x2),
)]
struct Z;
fn x2() -> X {
X(2)
}
// What version of X is inserted for Z?
commands.spawn(Z);
```
This is allowed (and encouraged), although this doesn't appear to occur
much in practice. First: only one version of `X` is initialized and
inserted for `Z`. In the case above, I think we can all probably agree
that it makes the most sense to use the `x2` constructor for `X`,
because `Y`'s `x1` constructor exists "beneath" `Z` in the inheritance
hierarchy; `Z`'s constructor is "more specific".
The algorithm is simple and predictable:
1. Use all of the constructors (including default constructors) directly
defined in the spawned component's require list
2. In the order the requires are defined in `#[require()]`, recursively
visit the require list of each of the components in the list (this is a
depth Depth First Search). When a constructor is found, it will only be
used if one has not already been found.
From a user perspective, just think about this as the following:
1. Specifying a required component constructor for `Foo` directly on a
spawned component `Bar` will result in that constructor being used (and
overriding existing constructors lower in the inheritance tree). This is
the classic "inheritance override" behavior people expect.
2. For cases where "multiple inheritance" results in constructor
clashes, Components should be listed in "importance order". List a
component earlier in the requirement list to initialize its inheritance
tree earlier.
Required Components _does_ generally result in a model where component
values are decoupled from each other at construction time. Notably, some
existing Bundle patterns use bundle constructors to initialize multiple
components with shared state. I think (in general) moving away from this
is necessary:
1. It allows Required Components (and the Scene system more generally)
to operate according to simple rules
2. The "do arbitrary init value sharing in Bundle constructors" approach
_already_ causes data consistency problems, and those problems would be
exacerbated in the context of a Scene/UI system. For cases where shared
state is truly necessary, I think we are better served by observers /
hooks.
3. If a situation _truly_ needs shared state constructors (which should
be rare / generally discouraged), Bundles are still there if they are
needed.
## Next Steps
* **Require Construct-ed Components**: I have already implemented this
(as defined in the [Next Generation Scene / UI
Proposal](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437). However
I've removed `Construct` support from this PR, as that has not landed
yet. Adding this back in requires relatively minimal changes to the
current impl, and can be done as part of a future Construct pr.
* **Port Built-in Bundles to Required Components**: This isn't something
we should do right away. It will require rethinking our public
interfaces, which IMO should be done holistically after the rest of Next
Generation Scene / UI lands. I think we should merge this PR first and
let people experiment _inside their own code with their own Components_
while we wait for the rest of the new scene system to land.
* **_Consider_ Automatic Required Component Removal**: We should
evaluate _if_ automatic Required Component removal should be done. Ex:
if all components that explicitly require a component are removed,
automatically remove that component. This issue has been explicitly
deferred in this PR, as I consider the insertion behavior to be
desirable on its own (and viable on its own). I am also doubtful that we
can find a design that has behavior we actually want. Aka: can we
_really_ distinguish between a component that is "only there because it
was automatically inserted" and "a component that was necessary / should
be kept". See my [discussion response
here](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/14437#discussioncomment-10268668)
for more details.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pascal Hertleif <killercup@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#14348
- Fixes#14528
- Less complex (but also likely less performant) alternative to #14611
## Solution
- Add a `is_dense` field flag to `QueryIter` indicating whether it is
dense or not, that is whether it can perform dense iteration or not;
- Check this flag any time iteration over a query is performed.
---
It would be nice if someone could try benching this change to see if it
actually matters.
~Note that this not 100% ready for mergin, since there are a bunch of
safety comments on the use of the various `IS_DENSE` for checks that
still need to be updated.~ This is ready modulo benchmarks
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Allow dynamic systems to take lists of system parameters whose length is
not known at compile time.
This can be used for building a system that runs a script defined at
runtime, where the script needs a variable number of query parameters.
It can also be used for building a system that collects a list of
plugins at runtime, and provides a parameter to each one.
This is most useful today with `Vec<Query<FilteredEntityMut>>`. It will
be even more useful with `Vec<DynSystemParam>` if #14817 is merged,
since the parameters in the list can then be of different types.
## Solution
Implement `SystemParam` and `SystemParamBuilder` for `Vec` and
`ParamSet<Vec>`.
## Example
```rust
let system = (vec![
QueryParamBuilder::new_box(|builder| {
builder.with::<B>().without::<C>();
}),
QueryParamBuilder::new_box(|builder| {
builder.with::<C>().without::<B>();
}),
],)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(|params: Vec<Query<&mut A>>| {
let mut count: usize = 0;
params
.into_iter()
.for_each(|mut query| count += query.iter_mut().count());
count
});
```
# Objective
- I needed to run a system whenever a specific condition became true
after being previously false.
- Other users might also need to run a system when a condition changes,
regardless of if it became true or false.
## Solution
- This adds two systems to common_conditions:
- `condition_changed` that changes whenever the inner condition changes
- `condition_became_true` that returns true whenever the inner condition
becomes true after previously being false
## Testing
- I added a doctest for each function
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Hohenheim <jan@hohenheim.ch>
# Objective
Fixes#14883
## Solution
Pretty simple update to `EntityCommands` methods to consume `self` and
return it rather than taking `&mut self`. The things probably worth
noting:
* I added `#[allow(clippy::should_implement_trait)]` to the `add` method
because it causes a linting conflict with `std::ops::Add`.
* `despawn` and `log_components` now return `Self`. I'm not sure if
that's exactly the desired behavior so I'm happy to adjust if that seems
wrong.
## Testing
Tested with `cargo run -p ci`. I think that should be sufficient to call
things good.
## Migration Guide
The most likely migration needed is changing code from this:
```
let mut entity = commands.get_or_spawn(entity);
if depth_prepass {
entity.insert(DepthPrepass);
}
if normal_prepass {
entity.insert(NormalPrepass);
}
if motion_vector_prepass {
entity.insert(MotionVectorPrepass);
}
if deferred_prepass {
entity.insert(DeferredPrepass);
}
```
to this:
```
let mut entity = commands.get_or_spawn(entity);
if depth_prepass {
entity = entity.insert(DepthPrepass);
}
if normal_prepass {
entity = entity.insert(NormalPrepass);
}
if motion_vector_prepass {
entity = entity.insert(MotionVectorPrepass);
}
if deferred_prepass {
entity.insert(DeferredPrepass);
}
```
as can be seen in several of the example code updates here. There will
probably also be instances where mutable `EntityCommands` vars no longer
need to be mutable.
# Objective
I tried writing something like this in my project
```rust
.observe(|e: Trigger<OnAdd, Skeleton>| {
panic!("Skeletoned! {e:?}");
});
```
and it didn't compile.
Having `Debug` trait defined on `Trigger` event will ease debugging the
observers a little bit.
## Solution
Add a bespoke `Debug` implementation when both the bundle and the event
have `Debug` implemented for them.
## Testing
I've added `println!("{trigger:#?}");` to the [observers
example](938d810766/examples/ecs/observers.rs (L124))
and it compiled!
Caveats with this PR are:
- removing this implementation if for any reason we will need it, will
be a breaking change
- the implementation is manually generated, which adds potential toil
when changing the `Trigger` structure
## Showcase
Log output:
```rust
on_add_mine: Trigger {
event: OnAdd,
propagate: false,
trigger: ObserverTrigger {
observer: 2v1#4294967298,
event_type: ComponentId(
0,
),
entity: 454v1#4294967750,
},
_marker: PhantomData<observers::Mine>,
}
```
Thank you for maintaining this engine! 🧡
# Objective
Support building systems with parameters whose types can be determined
at runtime.
## Solution
Create a `DynSystemParam` type that can be built using a
`SystemParamBuilder` of any type and then downcast to the appropriate
type dynamically.
## Example
```rust
let system = (
DynParamBuilder::new(LocalBuilder(3_usize)),
DynParamBuilder:🆕:<Query<()>>(QueryParamBuilder::new(|builder| {
builder.with::<A>();
})),
DynParamBuilder:🆕:<&Entities>(ParamBuilder),
)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(
|mut p0: DynSystemParam, mut p1: DynSystemParam, mut p2: DynSystemParam| {
let local = p0.downcast_mut::<Local<usize>>().unwrap();
let query_count = p1.downcast_mut::<Query<()>>().unwrap();
let entities = p2.downcast_mut::<&Entities>().unwrap();
},
);
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Periwink <charlesbour@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#14658.
## Solution
- Added `on_unimplemented` Diagnostic for `IntoObserverSystem` calling
out argument ordering in a `note`
- Added an example to the documentation on `App::observe` to provide
some explanation to users.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
- Deliberately introduced a parameter order error in the
`ecs/observers.rs` example as a test.
---
## Showcase
<details>
<summary>Error Before</summary>
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}: IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>` is not satisfied
--> examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13
|
18 | .observe(
| ------- required by a bound introduced by this call
19 | / |mines: Query<&Mine>,
20 | | trigger: Trigger<ExplodeMines>,
21 | | index: Res<SpatialIndex>,
22 | | mut commands: Commands| {
... |
34 | | }
35 | | },
| |_____________^ the trait `bevy::prelude::IntoSystem<bevy::prelude::Trigger<'static, _, _>, (), _>` is not implemented for closure `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}`, which is required by `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}: IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
|
= note: required for `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}` to implement `IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::observe`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:995:24
|
993 | pub fn observe<E: Event, B: Bundle, M>(
| ------- required by a bound in this associated function
994 | &mut self,
995 | observer: impl IntoObserverSystem<E, B, M>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::observe`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `bevy` (example "observers") due to 1 previous error
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error After</summary>
```
error[E0277]: `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}` cannot become an `ObserverSystem`
--> examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13
|
18 | .observe(
| ------- required by a bound introduced by this call
19 | / |mines: Query<&Mine>,
20 | | trigger: Trigger<ExplodeMines>,
21 | | index: Res<SpatialIndex>,
22 | | mut commands: Commands| {
... |
34 | | }
35 | | },
| |_____________^ the trait `IntoObserverSystem` is not implemented
|
= help: the trait `bevy::prelude::IntoSystem<bevy::prelude::Trigger<'static, _, _>, (), _>` is not implemented for closure `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}`, which is required by `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}: IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
= note: for function `ObserverSystem`s, ensure the first argument is a `Trigger<T>` and any subsequent ones are `SystemParam`
= note: required for `{closure@examples/ecs/observers.rs:19:13: 22:37}` to implement `IntoObserverSystem<_, _, _>`
note: required by a bound in `bevy::prelude::App::observe`
--> C:\Users\Zac\Documents\GitHub\bevy\crates\bevy_app\src\app.rs:1025:24
|
1023 | pub fn observe<E: Event, B: Bundle, M>(
| ------- required by a bound in this associated function
1024 | &mut self,
1025 | observer: impl IntoObserverSystem<E, B, M>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `App::observe`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `bevy` (example "observers") due to 1 previous error
```
</details>
# Objective
`ParamSetBuilder` is supposed to be used as a tuple constructor, but the
field was not marked `pub` so it's not actually usable outside of its
module.
## Solution
Mark the field `pub`.
Realize one advantage of doc tests over unit tests is that they test the
public API.
Add a doc test example that uses the field so that this would have been
caught.
Closes#14836.
`filter_map_unchanged` optionally maps to an inner value by applying a
function to the contained reference. This is useful in a situation where
you need to convert a `Mut<T>` to a `Mut<U>`, but only if `T` contains
`U`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Fixes#14782
## Solution
Enable the lint and fix all upcoming hints (`--fix`). Also tried to
figure out the false-positive (see review comment). Maybe split this PR
up into multiple parts where only the last one enables the lint, so some
can already be merged resulting in less many files touched / less
potential for merge conflicts?
Currently, there are some cases where it might be easier to read the
code with the qualifier, so perhaps remove the import of it and adapt
its cases? In the current stage it's just a plain adoption of the
suggestions in order to have a base to discuss.
## Testing
`cargo clippy` and `cargo run -p ci` are happy.
# Objective
When reading the ECS code it is sometimes confusing to understand why we
have 2 accesses, one of ComponentId and one of ArchetypeComponentId
## Solution
Make the usage of these 2 accesses more explicit
---------
Co-authored-by: Pascal Hertleif <killercup@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes Commands not being `Send` or `Sync` anymore in 0.14 by
implementing `Send` and `Sync` for `RawCommandQueue`.
## Solution
Reference discussion in
[discord](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/691052431974465548/1259464518539411570).
It seems that in https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/13249, when
adding a `RawCommandQueue` variant to the `InternalQueue`, the `Send /
Sync` traits were not implemented for it, which bubbled up all the way
to `Commands` not being `Send / Sync` anymore.
I am not very familiar with the ECS internals so I can't say whether the
`RawCommandQueue` is safe to be shared between threads, but I know for
sure that before the linked PR `Commands` were indeed `Send` and `Sync`
so that PR broke "some workflows" (mandatory
[xkcd](https://xkcd.com/1172/)).
## Testing
This PR itself includes a compile test to make sure `Commands` will
implement `Send` and `Sync`. The test itself fails without the
implementation and succeeds with it.
Furthermore, if I cherry pick the test to a previous release (i.e. 0.13)
it indeed succeeds, showing that this is a regression specific to 0.14.
---------
Signed-off-by: Luca Della Vedova <lucadv@intrinsic.ai>
# Objective
Fix#14771 by adding a `try_insert_if_new` method to the
`EntityCommands`
## Solution
This simply calls the `try_insert` function with `InsertMode::Keep`
## Testing
I did not add any test because `EntityCommands::try_insert` does not
seem to be tested either. I can add some if needed.
