bevy/crates/bevy_animation/src/lib.rs

1466 lines
51 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]
Forbid unsafe in most crates in the engine (#12684) # Objective Resolves #3824. `unsafe` code should be the exception, not the norm in Rust. It's obviously needed for various use cases as it's interfacing with platforms and essentially running the borrow checker at runtime in the ECS, but the touted benefits of Bevy is that we are able to heavily leverage Rust's safety, and we should be holding ourselves accountable to that by minimizing our unsafe footprint. ## Solution Deny `unsafe_code` workspace wide. Add explicit exceptions for the following crates, and forbid it in almost all of the others. * bevy_ecs - Obvious given how much unsafe is needed to achieve performant results * bevy_ptr - Works with raw pointers, even more low level than bevy_ecs. * bevy_render - due to needing to integrate with wgpu * bevy_window - due to needing to integrate with raw_window_handle * bevy_utils - Several unsafe utilities used by bevy_ecs. Ideally moved into bevy_ecs instead of made publicly usable. * bevy_reflect - Required for the unsafe type casting it's doing. * bevy_transform - for the parallel transform propagation * bevy_gizmos - For the SystemParam impls it has. * bevy_assets - To support reflection. Might not be required, not 100% sure yet. * bevy_mikktspace - due to being a conversion from a C library. Pending safe rewrite. * bevy_dynamic_plugin - Inherently unsafe due to the dynamic loading nature. Several uses of unsafe were rewritten, as they did not need to be using them: * bevy_text - a case of `Option::unchecked` could be rewritten as a normal for loop and match instead of an iterator. * bevy_color - the Pod/Zeroable implementations were replaceable with bytemuck's derive macros.
2024-03-27 03:30:08 +00:00
#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
#![doc(
html_logo_url = "https://bevyengine.org/assets/icon.png",
html_favicon_url = "https://bevyengine.org/assets/icon.png"
)]
//! Animation for the game engine Bevy
Add `core` and `alloc` over `std` Lints (#15281) # Objective - Fixes #6370 - Closes #6581 ## Solution - Added the following lints to the workspace: - `std_instead_of_core` - `std_instead_of_alloc` - `alloc_instead_of_core` - Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A) to split all `use` statements into single items. - Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix --allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically (usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate root). - Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses. - Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A) to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling. - Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use` statements due to conditional compilation attributes. ## Testing - Ran CI locally ## Migration Guide The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher. ## Notes - This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this fails and someone else tries again in the future. - Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std` where possible. - This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std` options for Bevy. --------- Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
2024-09-27 00:59:59 +00:00
extern crate alloc;
pub mod animatable;
pub mod graph;
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
pub mod keyframes;
pub mod transition;
mod util;
Add `core` and `alloc` over `std` Lints (#15281) # Objective - Fixes #6370 - Closes #6581 ## Solution - Added the following lints to the workspace: - `std_instead_of_core` - `std_instead_of_alloc` - `alloc_instead_of_core` - Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A) to split all `use` statements into single items. - Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix --allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically (usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate root). - Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses. - Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A) to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling. - Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use` statements due to conditional compilation attributes. ## Testing - Ran CI locally ## Migration Guide The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher. ## Notes - This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this fails and someone else tries again in the future. - Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std` where possible. - This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std` options for Bevy. --------- Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
2024-09-27 00:59:59 +00:00
use alloc::collections::BTreeMap;
use core::{
any::{Any, TypeId},
cell::RefCell,
fmt::Debug,
hash::{Hash, Hasher},
iter,
};
use bevy_app::{App, Plugin, PostUpdate};
Bevy Asset V2 (#8624) # Bevy Asset V2 Proposal ## Why Does Bevy Need A New Asset System? Asset pipelines are a central part of the gamedev process. Bevy's current asset system is missing a number of features that make it non-viable for many classes of gamedev. After plenty of discussions and [a long community feedback period](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/3972), we've identified a number missing features: * **Asset Preprocessing**: it should be possible to "preprocess" / "compile" / "crunch" assets at "development time" rather than when the game starts up. This enables offloading expensive work from deployed apps, faster asset loading, less runtime memory usage, etc. * **Per-Asset Loader Settings**: Individual assets cannot define their own loaders that override the defaults. Additionally, they cannot provide per-asset settings to their loaders. This is a huge limitation, as many asset types don't provide all information necessary for Bevy _inside_ the asset. For example, a raw PNG image says nothing about how it should be sampled (ex: linear vs nearest). * **Asset `.meta` files**: assets should have configuration files stored adjacent to the asset in question, which allows the user to configure asset-type-specific settings. These settings should be accessible during the pre-processing phase. Modifying a `.meta` file should trigger a re-processing / re-load of the asset. It should be possible to configure asset loaders from the meta file. * **Processed Asset Hot Reloading**: Changes to processed assets (or their dependencies) should result in re-processing them and re-loading the results in live Bevy Apps. * **Asset Dependency Tracking**: The current bevy_asset has no good way to wait for asset dependencies to load. It punts this as an exercise for consumers of the loader apis, which is unreasonable and error prone. There should be easy, ergonomic ways to wait for assets to load and block some logic on an asset's entire dependency tree loading. * **Runtime Asset Loading**: it should be (optionally) possible to load arbitrary assets dynamically at runtime. This necessitates being able to deploy and run the asset server alongside Bevy Apps on _all platforms_. For example, we should be able to invoke the shader compiler at runtime, stream scenes from sources like the internet, etc. To keep deployed binaries (and startup times) small, the runtime asset server configuration should be configurable with different settings compared to the "pre processor asset server". * **Multiple Backends**: It should be possible to load assets from arbitrary sources (filesystems, the internet, remote asset serves, etc). * **Asset Packing**: It should be possible to deploy assets in compressed "packs", which makes it easier and more efficient to distribute assets with Bevy Apps. * **Asset Handoff**: It should be possible to hold a "live" asset handle, which correlates to runtime data, without actually holding the asset in memory. Ex: it must be possible to hold a reference to a GPU mesh generated from a "mesh asset" without keeping the mesh data in CPU memory * **Per-Platform Processed Assets**: Different platforms and app distributions have different capabilities and requirements. Some platforms need lower asset resolutions or different asset formats to operate within the hardware constraints of the platform. It should be possible to define per-platform asset processing profiles. And it should be possible to deploy only the assets required for a given platform. These features have architectural implications that are significant enough to require a full rewrite. The current Bevy Asset implementation got us this far, but it can take us no farther. This PR defines a brand new asset system that implements most of these features, while laying the foundations for the remaining features to be built. ## Bevy Asset V2 Here is a quick overview of the features introduced in this PR. * **Asset Preprocessing**: Preprocess assets at development time into more efficient (and configurable) representations * **Dependency Aware**: Dependencies required to process an asset are tracked. If an asset's processed dependency changes, it will be reprocessed * **Hot Reprocessing/Reloading**: detect changes to asset source files, reprocess them if they have changed, and then hot-reload them in Bevy Apps. * **Only Process Changes**: Assets are only re-processed when their source file (or meta file) has changed. This uses hashing and timestamps to avoid processing assets that haven't changed. * **Transactional and Reliable**: Uses write-ahead logging (a technique commonly used by databases) to recover from crashes / forced-exits. Whenever possible it avoids full-reprocessing / only uncompleted transactions will be reprocessed. When the processor is running in parallel with a Bevy App, processor asset writes block Bevy App asset reads. Reading metadata + asset bytes is guaranteed to be transactional / correctly paired. * **Portable / Run anywhere / Database-free**: The processor does not rely on an in-memory database (although it uses some database techniques for reliability). This is important because pretty much all in-memory databases have unsupported platforms or build complications. * **Configure Processor Defaults Per File Type**: You can say "use this processor for all files of this type". * **Custom Processors**: The `Processor` trait is flexible and unopinionated. It can be implemented by downstream plugins. * **LoadAndSave Processors**: Most asset processing scenarios can be expressed as "run AssetLoader A, save the results using AssetSaver X, and then load the result using AssetLoader B". For example, load this png image using `PngImageLoader`, which produces an `Image` asset and then save it using `CompressedImageSaver` (which also produces an `Image` asset, but in a compressed format), which takes an `Image` asset as input. This means if you have an `AssetLoader` for an asset, you are already half way there! It also means that you can share AssetSavers across multiple loaders. Because `CompressedImageSaver` accepts Bevy's generic Image asset as input, it means you can also use it with some future `JpegImageLoader`. * **Loader and Saver Settings**: Asset Loaders and Savers can now define their own settings types, which are passed in as input when an asset is loaded / saved. Each asset can define its own settings. * **Asset `.meta` files**: configure asset loaders, their settings, enable/disable processing, and configure processor settings * **Runtime Asset Dependency Tracking** Runtime asset dependencies (ex: if an asset contains a `Handle<Image>`) are tracked by the asset server. An event is emitted when an asset and all of its dependencies have been loaded * **Unprocessed Asset Loading**: Assets do not require preprocessing. They can be loaded directly. A processed asset is just a "normal" asset with some extra metadata. Asset Loaders don't need to know or care about whether or not an asset was processed. * **Async Asset IO**: Asset readers/writers use async non-blocking interfaces. Note that because Rust doesn't yet support async traits, there is a bit of manual Boxing / Future boilerplate. This will hopefully be removed in the near future when Rust gets async traits. * **Pluggable Asset Readers and Writers**: Arbitrary asset source readers/writers are supported, both by the processor and the asset server. * **Better Asset Handles** * **Single Arc Tree**: Asset Handles now use a single arc tree that represents the lifetime of the asset. This makes their implementation simpler, more efficient, and allows us to cheaply attach metadata to handles. Ex: the AssetPath of a handle is now directly accessible on the handle itself! * **Const Typed Handles**: typed handles can be constructed in a const context. No more weird "const untyped converted to typed at runtime" patterns! * **Handles and Ids are Smaller / Faster To Hash / Compare**: Typed `Handle<T>` is now much smaller in memory and `AssetId<T>` is even smaller. * **Weak Handle Usage Reduction**: In general Handles are now considered to be "strong". Bevy features that previously used "weak `Handle<T>`" have been ported to `AssetId<T>`, which makes it statically clear that the features do not hold strong handles (while retaining strong type information). Currently Handle::Weak still exists, but it is very possible that we can remove that entirely. * **Efficient / Dense Asset Ids**: Assets now have efficient dense runtime asset ids, which means we can avoid expensive hash lookups. Assets are stored in Vecs instead of HashMaps. There are now typed and untyped ids, which means we no longer need to store dynamic type information in the ID for typed handles. "AssetPathId" (which was a nightmare from a performance and correctness standpoint) has been entirely removed in favor of dense ids (which are retrieved for a path on load) * **Direct Asset Loading, with Dependency Tracking**: Assets that are defined at runtime can still have their dependencies tracked by the Asset Server (ex: if you create a material at runtime, you can still wait for its textures to load). This is accomplished via the (currently optional) "asset dependency visitor" trait. This system can also be used to define a set of assets to load, then wait for those assets to load. * **Async folder loading**: Folder loading also uses this system and immediately returns a handle to the LoadedFolder asset, which means folder loading no longer blocks on directory traversals. * **Improved Loader Interface**: Loaders now have a specific "top level asset type", which makes returning the top-level asset simpler and statically typed. * **Basic Image Settings and Processing**: Image assets can now be processed into the gpu-friendly Basic Universal format. The ImageLoader now has a setting to define what format the image should be loaded as. Note that this is just a minimal MVP ... plenty of additional work to do here. To demo this, enable the `basis-universal` feature and turn on asset processing. * **Simpler Audio Play / AudioSink API**: Asset handle providers are cloneable, which means the Audio resource can mint its own handles. This means you can now do `let sink_handle = audio.play(music)` instead of `let sink_handle = audio_sinks.get_handle(audio.play(music))`. Note that this might still be replaced by https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/8424. **Removed Handle Casting From Engine Features**: Ex: FontAtlases no longer use casting between handle types ## Using The New Asset System ### Normal Unprocessed Asset Loading By default the `AssetPlugin` does not use processing. It behaves pretty much the same way as the old system. If you are defining a custom asset, first derive `Asset`: ```rust #[derive(Asset)] struct Thing { value: String, } ``` Initialize the asset: ```rust app.init_asset:<Thing>() ``` Implement a new `AssetLoader` for it: ```rust #[derive(Default)] struct ThingLoader; #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Default)] pub struct ThingSettings { some_setting: bool, } impl AssetLoader for ThingLoader { type Asset = Thing; type Settings = ThingSettings; fn load<'a>( &'a self, reader: &'a mut Reader, settings: &'a ThingSettings, load_context: &'a mut LoadContext, ) -> BoxedFuture<'a, Result<Thing, anyhow::Error>> { Box::pin(async move { let mut bytes = Vec::new(); reader.read_to_end(&mut bytes).await?; // convert bytes to value somehow Ok(Thing { value }) }) } fn extensions(&self) -> &[&str] { &["thing"] } } ``` Note that this interface will get much cleaner once Rust gets support for async traits. `Reader` is an async futures_io::AsyncRead. You can stream bytes as they come in or read them all into a `Vec<u8>`, depending on the context. You can use `let handle = load_context.load(path)` to kick off a dependency load, retrieve a handle, and register the dependency for the asset. Then just register the loader in your Bevy app: ```rust app.init_asset_loader::<ThingLoader>() ``` Now just add your `Thing` asset files into the `assets` folder and load them like this: ```rust fn system(asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) { let handle = Handle<Thing> = asset_server.load("cool.thing"); } ``` You can check load states directly via the asset server: ```rust if asset_server.load_state(&handle) == LoadState::Loaded { } ``` You can also listen for events: ```rust fn system(mut events: EventReader<AssetEvent<Thing>>, handle: Res<SomeThingHandle>) { for event in events.iter() { if event.is_loaded_with_dependencies(&handle) { } } } ``` Note the new `AssetEvent::LoadedWithDependencies`, which only fires when the asset is loaded _and_ all dependencies (and their dependencies) have loaded. Unlike the old asset system, for a given asset path all `Handle<T>` values point to the same underlying Arc. This means Handles can cheaply hold more asset information, such as the AssetPath: ```rust // prints the AssetPath of the handle info!("{:?}", handle.path()) ``` ### Processed Assets Asset processing can be enabled via the `AssetPlugin`. When developing Bevy Apps with processed assets, do this: ```rust app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin::processed_dev())) ``` This runs the `AssetProcessor` in the background with hot-reloading. It reads assets from the `assets` folder, processes them, and writes them to the `.imported_assets` folder. Asset loads in the Bevy App will wait for a processed version of the asset to become available. If an asset in the `assets` folder changes, it will be reprocessed and hot-reloaded in the Bevy App. When deploying processed Bevy apps, do this: ```rust app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin::processed())) ``` This does not run the `AssetProcessor` in the background. It behaves like `AssetPlugin::unprocessed()`, but reads assets from `.imported_assets`. When the `AssetProcessor` is running, it will populate sibling `.meta` files for assets in the `assets` folder. Meta files for assets that do not have a processor configured look like this: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", asset: Load( loader: "bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader", settings: ( format: FromExtension, ), ), ) ``` This is metadata for an image asset. For example, if you have `assets/my_sprite.png`, this could be the metadata stored at `assets/my_sprite.png.meta`. Meta files are totally optional. If no metadata exists, the default settings will be used. In short, this file says "load this asset with the ImageLoader and use the file extension to determine the image type". This type of meta file is supported in all AssetPlugin modes. If in `Unprocessed` mode, the asset (with the meta settings) will be loaded directly. If in `ProcessedDev` mode, the asset file will be copied directly to the `.imported_assets` folder. The meta will also be copied directly to the `.imported_assets` folder, but with one addition: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", processed_info: Some(( hash: 12415480888597742505, full_hash: 14344495437905856884, process_dependencies: [], )), asset: Load( loader: "bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader", settings: ( format: FromExtension, ), ), ) ``` `processed_info` contains `hash` (a direct hash of the asset and meta bytes), `full_hash` (a hash of `hash` and the hashes of all `process_dependencies`), and `process_dependencies` (the `path` and `full_hash` of every process_dependency). A "process dependency" is an asset dependency that is _directly_ used when processing the asset. Images do not have process dependencies, so this is empty. When the processor is enabled, you can use the `Process` metadata config: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", asset: Process( processor: "bevy_asset::processor::process::LoadAndSave<bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader, bevy_render::texture::compressed_image_saver::CompressedImageSaver>", settings: ( loader_settings: ( format: FromExtension, ), saver_settings: ( generate_mipmaps: true, ), ), ), ) ``` This configures the asset to use the `LoadAndSave` processor, which runs an AssetLoader and feeds the result into an AssetSaver (which saves the given Asset and defines a loader to load it with). (for terseness LoadAndSave will likely get a shorter/friendlier type name when [Stable Type Paths](#7184) lands). `LoadAndSave` is likely to be the most common processor type, but arbitrary processors are supported. `CompressedImageSaver` saves an `Image` in the Basis Universal format and configures the ImageLoader to load it as basis universal. The `AssetProcessor` will read this meta, run it through the LoadAndSave processor, and write the basis-universal version of the image to `.imported_assets`. The final metadata will look like this: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", processed_info: Some(( hash: 905599590923828066, full_hash: 9948823010183819117, process_dependencies: [], )), asset: Load( loader: "bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader", settings: ( format: Format(Basis), ), ), ) ``` To try basis-universal processing out in Bevy examples, (for example `sprite.rs`), change `add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)` to `add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin::processed_dev()))` and run with the `basis-universal` feature enabled: `cargo run --features=basis-universal --example sprite`. To create a custom processor, there are two main paths: 1. Use the `LoadAndSave` processor with an existing `AssetLoader`. Implement the `AssetSaver` trait, register the processor using `asset_processor.register_processor::<LoadAndSave<ImageLoader, CompressedImageSaver>>(image_saver.into())`. 2. Implement the `Process` trait directly and register it using: `asset_processor.register_processor(thing_processor)`. You can configure default processors for file extensions like this: ```rust asset_processor.set_default_processor::<ThingProcessor>("thing") ``` There is one more metadata type to be aware of: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", asset: Ignore, ) ``` This will ignore the asset during processing / prevent it from being written to `.imported_assets`. The AssetProcessor stores a transaction log at `.imported_assets/log` and uses it to gracefully recover from unexpected stops. This means you can force-quit the processor (and Bevy Apps running the processor in parallel) at arbitrary times! `.imported_assets` is "local state". It should _not_ be checked into source control. It should also be considered "read only". In practice, you _can_ modify processed assets and processed metadata if you really need to test something. But those modifications will not be represented in the hashes of the assets, so the processed state will be "out of sync" with the source assets. The processor _will not_ fix this for you. Either revert the change after you have tested it, or delete the processed files so they can be re-populated. ## Open Questions There are a number of open questions to be discussed. We should decide if they need to be addressed in this PR and if so, how we will address them: ### Implied Dependencies vs Dependency Enumeration There are currently two ways to populate asset dependencies: * **Implied via AssetLoaders**: if an AssetLoader loads an asset (and retrieves a handle), a dependency is added to the list. * **Explicit via the optional Asset::visit_dependencies**: if `server.load_asset(my_asset)` is called, it will call `my_asset.visit_dependencies`, which will grab dependencies that have been manually defined for the asset via the Asset trait impl (which can be derived). This means that defining explicit dependencies is optional for "loaded assets". And the list of dependencies is always accurate because loaders can only produce Handles if they register dependencies. If an asset was loaded with an AssetLoader, it only uses the implied dependencies. If an asset was created at runtime and added with `asset_server.load_asset(MyAsset)`, it will use `Asset::visit_dependencies`. However this can create a behavior mismatch between loaded assets and equivalent "created at runtime" assets if `Assets::visit_dependencies` doesn't exactly match the dependencies produced by the AssetLoader. This behavior mismatch can be resolved by completely removing "implied loader dependencies" and requiring `Asset::visit_dependencies` to supply dependency data. But this creates two problems: * It makes defining loaded assets harder and more error prone: Devs must remember to manually annotate asset dependencies with `#[dependency]` when deriving `Asset`. For more complicated assets (such as scenes), the derive likely wouldn't be sufficient and a manual `visit_dependencies` impl would be required. * Removes the ability to immediately kick off dependency loads: When AssetLoaders retrieve a Handle, they also immediately kick off an asset load for the handle, which means it can start loading in parallel _before_ the asset finishes loading. For large assets, this could be significant. (although this could be mitigated for processed assets if we store dependencies in the processed meta file and load them ahead of time) ### Eager ProcessorDev Asset Loading I made a controversial call in the interest of fast startup times ("time to first pixel") for the "processor dev mode configuration". When initializing the AssetProcessor, current processed versions of unchanged assets are yielded immediately, even if their dependencies haven't been checked yet for reprocessing. This means that non-current-state-of-filesystem-but-previously-valid assets might be returned to the App first, then hot-reloaded if/when their dependencies change and the asset is reprocessed. Is this behavior desirable? There is largely one alternative: do not yield an asset from the processor to the app until all of its dependencies have been checked for changes. In some common cases (load dependency has not changed since last run) this will increase startup time. The main question is "by how much" and is that slower startup time worth it in the interest of only yielding assets that are true to the current state of the filesystem. Should this be configurable? I'm starting to think we should only yield an asset after its (historical) dependencies have been checked for changes + processed as necessary, but I'm curious what you all think. ### Paths Are Currently The Only Canonical ID / Do We Want Asset UUIDs? In this implementation AssetPaths are the only canonical asset identifier (just like the previous Bevy Asset system and Godot). Moving assets will result in re-scans (and currently reprocessing, although reprocessing can easily be avoided with some changes). Asset renames/moves will break code and assets that rely on specific paths, unless those paths are fixed up. Do we want / need "stable asset uuids"? Introducing them is very possible: 1. Generate a UUID and include it in .meta files 2. Support UUID in AssetPath 3. Generate "asset indices" which are loaded on startup and map UUIDs to paths. 4 (maybe). Consider only supporting UUIDs for processed assets so we can generate quick-to-load indices instead of scanning meta files. The main "pro" is that assets referencing UUIDs don't need to be migrated when a path changes. The main "con" is that UUIDs cannot be "lazily resolved" like paths. They need a full view of all assets to answer the question "does this UUID exist". Which means UUIDs require the AssetProcessor to fully finish startup scans before saying an asset doesnt exist. And they essentially require asset pre-processing to use in apps, because scanning all asset metadata files at runtime to resolve a UUID is not viable for medium-to-large apps. It really requires a pre-generated UUID index, which must be loaded before querying for assets. I personally think this should be investigated in a separate PR. Paths aren't going anywhere ... _everyone_ uses filesystems (and filesystem-like apis) to manage their asset source files. I consider them permanent canonical asset information. Additionally, they behave well for both processed and unprocessed asset modes. Given that Bevy is supporting both, this feels like the right canonical ID to start with. UUIDS (and maybe even other indexed-identifier types) can be added later as necessary. ### Folder / File Naming Conventions All asset processing config currently lives in the `.imported_assets` folder. The processor transaction log is in `.imported_assets/log`. Processed assets are added to `.imported_assets/Default`, which will make migrating to processed asset profiles (ex: a `.imported_assets/Mobile` profile) a non-breaking change. It also allows us to create top-level files like `.imported_assets/log` without it being interpreted as an asset. Meta files currently have a `.meta` suffix. Do we like these names and conventions? ### Should the `AssetPlugin::processed_dev` configuration enable `watch_for_changes` automatically? Currently it does (which I think makes sense), but it does make it the only configuration that enables watch_for_changes by default. ### Discuss on_loaded High Level Interface: This PR includes a very rough "proof of concept" `on_loaded` system adapter that uses the `LoadedWithDependencies` event in combination with `asset_server.load_asset` dependency tracking to support this pattern ```rust fn main() { App::new() .init_asset::<MyAssets>() .add_systems(Update, on_loaded(create_array_texture)) .run(); } #[derive(Asset, Clone)] struct MyAssets { #[dependency] picture_of_my_cat: Handle<Image>, #[dependency] picture_of_my_other_cat: Handle<Image>, } impl FromWorld for ArrayTexture { fn from_world(world: &mut World) -> Self { picture_of_my_cat: server.load("meow.png"), picture_of_my_other_cat: server.load("meeeeeeeow.png"), } } fn spawn_cat(In(my_assets): In<MyAssets>, mut commands: Commands) { commands.spawn(SpriteBundle { texture: my_assets.picture_of_my_cat.clone(), ..default() }); commands.spawn(SpriteBundle { texture: my_assets.picture_of_my_other_cat.clone(), ..default() }); } ``` The implementation is _very_ rough. And it is currently unsafe because `bevy_ecs` doesn't expose some internals to do this safely from inside `bevy_asset`. There are plenty of unanswered questions like: * "do we add a Loadable" derive? (effectively automate the FromWorld implementation above) * Should `MyAssets` even be an Asset? (largely implemented this way because it elegantly builds on `server.load_asset(MyAsset { .. })` dependency tracking). We should think hard about what our ideal API looks like (and if this is a pattern we want to support). Not necessarily something we need to solve in this PR. The current `on_loaded` impl should probably be removed from this PR before merging. ## Clarifying Questions ### What about Assets as Entities? This Bevy Asset V2 proposal implementation initially stored Assets as ECS Entities. Instead of `AssetId<T>` + the `Assets<T>` resource it used `Entity` as the asset id and Asset values were just ECS components. There are plenty of compelling reasons to do this: 1. Easier to inline assets in Bevy Scenes (as they are "just" normal entities + components) 2. More flexible queries: use the power of the ECS to filter assets (ex: `Query<Mesh, With<Tree>>`). 3. Extensible. Users can add arbitrary component data to assets. 4. Things like "component visualization tools" work out of the box to visualize asset data. However Assets as Entities has a ton of caveats right now: * We need to be able to allocate entity ids without a direct World reference (aka rework id allocator in Entities ... i worked around this in my prototypes by just pre allocating big chunks of entities) * We want asset change events in addition to ECS change tracking ... how do we populate them when mutations can come from anywhere? Do we use Changed queries? This would require iterating over the change data for all assets every frame. Is this acceptable or should we implement a new "event based" component change detection option? * Reconciling manually created assets with asset-system managed assets has some nuance (ex: are they "loaded" / do they also have that component metadata?) * "how do we handle "static" / default entity handles" (ties in to the Entity Indices discussion: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/8319). This is necessary for things like "built in" assets and default handles in things like SpriteBundle. * Storing asset information as a component makes it easy to "invalidate" asset state by removing the component (or forcing modifications). Ideally we have ways to lock this down (some combination of Rust type privacy and ECS validation) In practice, how we store and identify assets is a reasonably superficial change (porting off of Assets as Entities and implementing dedicated storage + ids took less than a day). So once we sort out the remaining challenges the flip should be straightforward. Additionally, I do still have "Assets as Entities" in my commit history, so we can reuse that work. I personally think "assets as entities" is a good endgame, but it also doesn't provide _significant_ value at the moment and it certainly isn't ready yet with the current state of things. ### Why not Distill? [Distill](https://github.com/amethyst/distill) is a high quality fully featured asset system built in Rust. It is very natural to ask "why not just use Distill?". It is also worth calling out that for awhile, [we planned on adopting Distill / I signed off on it](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/708). However I think Bevy has a number of constraints that make Distill adoption suboptimal: * **Architectural Simplicity:** * Distill's processor requires an in-memory database (lmdb) and RPC networked API (using Cap'n Proto). Each of these introduces API complexity that increases maintenance burden and "code grokability". Ignoring tests, documentation, and examples, Distill has 24,237 lines of Rust code (including generated code for RPC + database interactions). If you ignore generated code, it has 11,499 lines. * Bevy builds the AssetProcessor and AssetServer using pluggable AssetReader/AssetWriter Rust traits with simple io interfaces. They do not necessitate databases or RPC interfaces (although Readers/Writers could use them if that is desired). Bevy Asset V2 (at the time of writing this PR) is 5,384 lines of Rust code (ignoring tests, documentation, and examples). Grain of salt: Distill does have more features currently (ex: Asset Packing, GUIDS, remote-out-of-process asset processor). I do plan to implement these features in Bevy Asset V2 and I personally highly doubt they will meaningfully close the 6115 lines-of-code gap. * This complexity gap (which while illustrated by lines of code, is much bigger than just that) is noteworthy to me. Bevy should be hackable and there are pillars of Distill that are very hard to understand and extend. This is a matter of opinion (and Bevy Asset V2 also has complicated areas), but I think Bevy Asset V2 is much more approachable for the average developer. * Necessary disclaimer: counting lines of code is an extremely rough complexity metric. Read the code and form your own opinions. * **Optional Asset Processing:** Not all Bevy Apps (or Bevy App developers) need / want asset preprocessing. Processing increases the complexity of the development environment by introducing things like meta files, imported asset storage, running processors in the background, waiting for processing to finish, etc. Distill _requires_ preprocessing to work. With Bevy Asset V2 processing is fully opt-in. The AssetServer isn't directly aware of asset processors at all. AssetLoaders only care about converting bytes to runtime Assets ... they don't know or care if the bytes were pre-processed or not. Processing is "elegantly" (forgive my self-congratulatory phrasing) layered on top and builds on the existing Asset system primitives. * **Direct Filesystem Access to Processed Asset State:** Distill stores processed assets in a database. This makes debugging / inspecting the processed outputs harder (either requires special tooling to query the database or they need to be "deployed" to be inspected). Bevy Asset V2, on the other hand, stores processed assets in the filesystem (by default ... this is configurable). This makes interacting with the processed state more natural. Note that both Godot and Unity's new asset system store processed assets in the filesystem. * **Portability**: Because Distill's processor uses lmdb and RPC networking, it cannot be run on certain platforms (ex: lmdb is a non-rust dependency that cannot run on the web, some platforms don't support running network servers). Bevy should be able to process assets everywhere (ex: run the Bevy Editor on the web, compile + process shaders on mobile, etc). Distill does partially mitigate this problem by supporting "streaming" assets via the RPC protocol, but this is not a full solve from my perspective. And Bevy Asset V2 can (in theory) also stream assets (without requiring RPC, although this isn't implemented yet) Note that I _do_ still think Distill would be a solid asset system for Bevy. But I think the approach in this PR is a better solve for Bevy's specific "asset system requirements". ### Doesn't async-fs just shim requests to "sync" `std::fs`? What is the point? "True async file io" has limited / spotty platform support. async-fs (and the rust async ecosystem generally ... ex Tokio) currently use async wrappers over std::fs that offload blocking requests to separate threads. This may feel unsatisfying, but it _does_ still provide value because it prevents our task pools from blocking on file system operations (which would prevent progress when there are many tasks to do, but all threads in a pool are currently blocking on file system ops). Additionally, using async APIs for our AssetReaders and AssetWriters also provides value because we can later add support for "true async file io" for platforms that support it. _And_ we can implement other "true async io" asset backends (such as networked asset io). ## Draft TODO - [x] Fill in missing filesystem event APIs: file removed event (which is expressed as dangling RenameFrom events in some cases), file/folder renamed event - [x] Assets without loaders are not moved to the processed folder. This breaks things like referenced `.bin` files for GLTFs. This should be configurable per-non-asset-type. - [x] Initial implementation of Reflect and FromReflect for Handle. The "deserialization" parity bar is low here as this only worked with static UUIDs in the old impl ... this is a non-trivial problem. Either we add a Handle::AssetPath variant that gets "upgraded" to a strong handle on scene load or we use a separate AssetRef type for Bevy scenes (which is converted to a runtime Handle on load). This deserves its own discussion in a different pr. - [x] Populate read_asset_bytes hash when run by the processor (a bit of a special case .. when run by the processor the processed meta will contain the hash so we don't need to compute it on the spot, but we don't want/need to read the meta when run by the main AssetServer) - [x] Delay hot reloading: currently filesystem events are handled immediately, which creates timing issues in some cases. For example hot reloading images can sometimes break because the image isn't finished writing. We should add a delay, likely similar to the [implementation in this PR](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/8503). - [x] Port old platform-specific AssetIo implementations to the new AssetReader interface (currently missing Android and web) - [x] Resolve on_loaded unsafety (either by removing the API entirely or removing the unsafe) - [x] Runtime loader setting overrides - [x] Remove remaining unwraps that should be error-handled. There are number of TODOs here - [x] Pretty AssetPath Display impl - [x] Document more APIs - [x] Resolve spurious "reloading because it has changed" events (to repro run load_gltf with `processed_dev()`) - [x] load_dependency hot reloading currently only works for processed assets. If processing is disabled, load_dependency changes are not hot reloaded. - [x] Replace AssetInfo dependency load/fail counters with `loading_dependencies: HashSet<UntypedAssetId>` to prevent reloads from (potentially) breaking counters. Storing this will also enable "dependency reloaded" events (see [Next Steps](#next-steps)) - [x] Re-add filesystem watcher cargo feature gate (currently it is not optional) - [ ] Migration Guide - [ ] Changelog ## Followup TODO - [ ] Replace "eager unchanged processed asset loading" behavior with "don't returned unchanged processed asset until dependencies have been checked". - [ ] Add true `Ignore` AssetAction that does not copy the asset to the imported_assets folder. - [ ] Finish "live asset unloading" (ex: free up CPU asset memory after uploading an image to the GPU), rethink RenderAssets, and port renderer features. The `Assets` collection uses `Option<T>` for asset storage to support its removal. (1) the Option might not actually be necessary ... might be able to just remove from the collection entirely (2) need to finalize removal apis - [ ] Try replacing the "channel based" asset id recycling with something a bit more efficient (ex: we might be able to use raw atomic ints with some cleverness) - [ ] Consider adding UUIDs to processed assets (scoped just to helping identify moved assets ... not exposed to load queries ... see [Next Steps](#next-steps)) - [ ] Store "last modified" source asset and meta timestamps in processed meta files to enable skipping expensive hashing when the file wasn't changed - [ ] Fix "slow loop" handle drop fix - [ ] Migrate to TypeName - [x] Handle "loader preregistration". See #9429 ## Next Steps * **Configurable per-type defaults for AssetMeta**: It should be possible to add configuration like "all png image meta should default to using nearest sampling" (currently this hard-coded per-loader/processor Settings::default() impls). Also see the "Folder Meta" bullet point. * **Avoid Reprocessing on Asset Renames / Moves**: See the "canonical asset ids" discussion in [Open Questions](#open-questions) and the relevant bullet point in [Draft TODO](#draft-todo). Even without canonical ids, folder renames could avoid reprocessing in some cases. * **Multiple Asset Sources**: Expand AssetPath to support "asset source names" and support multiple AssetReaders in the asset server (ex: `webserver://some_path/image.png` backed by an Http webserver AssetReader). The "default" asset reader would use normal `some_path/image.png` paths. Ideally this works in combination with multiple AssetWatchers for hot-reloading * **Stable Type Names**: this pr removes the TypeUuid requirement from assets in favor of `std::any::type_name`. This makes defining assets easier (no need to generate a new uuid / use weird proc macro syntax). It also makes reading meta files easier (because things have "friendly names"). We also use type names for components in scene files. If they are good enough for components, they are good enough for assets. And consistency across Bevy pillars is desirable. However, `std::any::type_name` is not guaranteed to be stable (although in practice it is). We've developed a [stable type path](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7184) to resolve this, which should be adopted when it is ready. * **Command Line Interface**: It should be possible to run the asset processor in a separate process from the command line. This will also require building a network-server-backed AssetReader to communicate between the app and the processor. We've been planning to build a "bevy cli" for awhile. This seems like a good excuse to build it. * **Asset Packing**: This is largely an additive feature, so it made sense to me to punt this until we've laid the foundations in this PR. * **Per-Platform Processed Assets**: It should be possible to generate assets for multiple platforms by supporting multiple "processor profiles" per asset (ex: compress with format X on PC and Y on iOS). I think there should probably be arbitrary "profiles" (which can be separate from actual platforms), which are then assigned to a given platform when generating the final asset distribution for that platform. Ex: maybe devs want a "Mobile" profile that is shared between iOS and Android. Or a "LowEnd" profile shared between web and mobile. * **Versioning and Migrations**: Assets, Loaders, Savers, and Processors need to have versions to determine if their schema is valid. If an asset / loader version is incompatible with the current version expected at runtime, the processor should be able to migrate them. I think we should try using Bevy Reflect for this, as it would allow us to load the old version as a dynamic Reflect type without actually having the old Rust type. It would also allow us to define "patches" to migrate between versions (Bevy Reflect devs are currently working on patching). The `.meta` file already has its own format version. Migrating that to new versions should also be possible. * **Real Copy-on-write AssetPaths**: Rust's actual Cow (clone-on-write type) currently used by AssetPath can still result in String clones that aren't actually necessary (cloning an Owned Cow clones the contents). Bevy's asset system requires cloning AssetPaths in a number of places, which result in actual clones of the internal Strings. This is not efficient. AssetPath internals should be reworked to exhibit truer cow-like-behavior that reduces String clones to the absolute minimum. * **Consider processor-less processing**: In theory the AssetServer could run processors "inline" even if the background AssetProcessor is disabled. If we decide this is actually desirable, we could add this. But I don't think its a priority in the short or medium term. * **Pre-emptive dependency loading**: We could encode dependencies in processed meta files, which could then be used by the Asset Server to kick of dependency loads as early as possible (prior to starting the actual asset load). Is this desirable? How much time would this save in practice? * **Optimize Processor With UntypedAssetIds**: The processor exclusively uses AssetPath to identify assets currently. It might be possible to swap these out for UntypedAssetIds in some places, which are smaller / cheaper to hash and compare. * **One to Many Asset Processing**: An asset source file that produces many assets currently must be processed into a single "processed" asset source. If labeled assets can be written separately they can each have their own configured savers _and_ they could be loaded more granularly. Definitely worth exploring! * **Automatically Track "Runtime-only" Asset Dependencies**: Right now, tracking "created at runtime" asset dependencies requires adding them via `asset_server.load_asset(StandardMaterial::default())`. I think with some cleverness we could also do this for `materials.add(StandardMaterial::default())`, making tracking work "everywhere". There are challenges here relating to change detection / ensuring the server is made aware of dependency changes. This could be expensive in some cases. * **"Dependency Changed" events**: Some assets have runtime artifacts that need to be re-generated when one of their dependencies change (ex: regenerate a material's bind group when a Texture needs to change). We are generating the dependency graph so we can definitely produce these events. Buuuuut generating these events will have a cost / they could be high frequency for some assets, so we might want this to be opt-in for specific cases. * **Investigate Storing More Information In Handles**: Handles can now store arbitrary information, which makes it cheaper and easier to access. How much should we move into them? Canonical asset load states (via atomics)? (`handle.is_loaded()` would be very cool). Should we store the entire asset and remove the `Assets<T>` collection? (`Arc<RwLock<Option<Image>>>`?) * **Support processing and loading files without extensions**: This is a pretty arbitrary restriction and could be supported with very minimal changes. * **Folder Meta**: It would be nice if we could define per folder processor configuration defaults (likely in a `.meta` or `.folder_meta` file). Things like "default to linear filtering for all Images in this folder". * **Replace async_broadcast with event-listener?** This might be approximately drop-in for some uses and it feels more light weight * **Support Running the AssetProcessor on the Web**: Most of the hard work is done here, but there are some easy straggling TODOs (make the transaction log an interface instead of a direct file writer so we can write a web storage backend, implement an AssetReader/AssetWriter that reads/writes to something like LocalStorage). * **Consider identifying and preventing circular dependencies**: This is especially important for "processor dependencies", as processing will silently never finish in these cases. * **Built-in/Inlined Asset Hot Reloading**: This PR regresses "built-in/inlined" asset hot reloading (previously provided by the DebugAssetServer). I'm intentionally punting this because I think it can be cleanly implemented with "multiple asset sources" by registering a "debug asset source" (ex: `debug://bevy_pbr/src/render/pbr.wgsl` asset paths) in combination with an AssetWatcher for that asset source and support for "manually loading pats with asset bytes instead of AssetReaders". The old DebugAssetServer was quite nasty and I'd love to avoid that hackery going forward. * **Investigate ways to remove double-parsing meta files**: Parsing meta files currently involves parsing once with "minimal" versions of the meta file to extract the type name of the loader/processor config, then parsing again to parse the "full" meta. This is suboptimal. We should be able to define custom deserializers that (1) assume the loader/processor type name comes first (2) dynamically looks up the loader/processor registrations to deserialize settings in-line (similar to components in the bevy scene format). Another alternative: deserialize as dynamic Reflect objects and then convert. * **More runtime loading configuration**: Support using the Handle type as a hint to select an asset loader (instead of relying on AssetPath extensions) * **More high level Processor trait implementations**: For example, it might be worth adding support for arbitrary chains of "asset transforms" that modify an in-memory asset representation between loading and saving. (ex: load a Mesh, run a `subdivide_mesh` transform, followed by a `flip_normals` transform, then save the mesh to an efficient compressed format). * **Bevy Scene Handle Deserialization**: (see the relevant [Draft TODO item](#draft-todo) for context) * **Explore High Level Load Interfaces**: See [this discussion](#discuss-on_loaded-high-level-interface) for one prototype. * **Asset Streaming**: It would be great if we could stream Assets (ex: stream a long video file piece by piece) * **ID Exchanging**: In this PR Asset Handles/AssetIds are bigger than they need to be because they have a Uuid enum variant. If we implement an "id exchanging" system that trades Uuids for "efficient runtime ids", we can cut down on the size of AssetIds, making them more efficient. This has some open design questions, such as how to spawn entities with "default" handle values (as these wouldn't have access to the exchange api in the current system). * **Asset Path Fixup Tooling**: Assets that inline asset paths inside them will break when an asset moves. The asset system provides the functionality to detect when paths break. We should build a framework that enables formats to define "path migrations". This is especially important for scene files. For editor-generated files, we should also consider using UUIDs (see other bullet point) to avoid the need to migrate in these cases. --------- Co-authored-by: BeastLe9enD <beastle9end@outlook.de> Co-authored-by: Mike <mike.hsu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-07 02:07:27 +00:00
use bevy_asset::{Asset, AssetApp, Assets, Handle};
use bevy_core::Name;
use bevy_ecs::{
entity::MapEntities, prelude::*, reflect::ReflectMapEntities, world::EntityMutExcept,
};
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
use bevy_math::FloatExt;
use bevy_reflect::{
prelude::ReflectDefault, utility::NonGenericTypeInfoCell, ApplyError, DynamicStruct, FieldIter,
FromReflect, FromType, GetTypeRegistration, NamedField, PartialReflect, Reflect,
ReflectFromPtr, ReflectKind, ReflectMut, ReflectOwned, ReflectRef, Struct, StructInfo,
TypeInfo, TypePath, TypeRegistration, Typed,
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
};
use bevy_time::Time;
use bevy_transform::{prelude::Transform, TransformSystem};
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
use bevy_ui::UiSystem;
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
use bevy_utils::{
hashbrown::HashMap,
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
tracing::{trace, warn},
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
NoOpHash,
};
use fixedbitset::FixedBitSet;
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
use graph::AnimationMask;
use petgraph::{graph::NodeIndex, Direction};
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
use thread_local::ThreadLocal;
use uuid::Uuid;
/// The animation prelude.
///
/// This includes the most common types in this crate, re-exported for your convenience.
pub mod prelude {
#[doc(hidden)]
pub use crate::{
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
animatable::*, graph::*, keyframes::*, transition::*, AnimationClip, AnimationPlayer,
AnimationPlugin, Interpolation, VariableCurve,
};
}
use crate::{
graph::{AnimationGraph, AnimationGraphAssetLoader, AnimationNodeIndex},
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
keyframes::Keyframes,
transition::{advance_transitions, expire_completed_transitions, AnimationTransitions},
};
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// The [UUID namespace] of animation targets (e.g. bones).
///
/// [UUID namespace]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier#Versions_3_and_5_(namespace_name-based)
pub static ANIMATION_TARGET_NAMESPACE: Uuid = Uuid::from_u128(0x3179f519d9274ff2b5966fd077023911);
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
/// Describes how an attribute of a [`Transform`] or
/// [`bevy_render::mesh::morph::MorphWeights`] should be animated.
///
/// `keyframe_timestamps` and `keyframes` should have the same length.
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
#[derive(Debug, TypePath)]
pub struct VariableCurve {
/// Timestamp for each of the keyframes.
pub keyframe_timestamps: Vec<f32>,
/// List of the keyframes.
///
/// The representation will depend on the interpolation type of this curve:
///
/// - for `Interpolation::Step` and `Interpolation::Linear`, each keyframe is a single value
/// - for `Interpolation::CubicSpline`, each keyframe is made of three values for `tangent_in`,
/// `keyframe_value` and `tangent_out`
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
pub keyframes: Box<dyn Keyframes>,
/// Interpolation method to use between keyframes.
pub interpolation: Interpolation,
}
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
impl Clone for VariableCurve {
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
VariableCurve {
keyframe_timestamps: self.keyframe_timestamps.clone(),
keyframes: Keyframes::clone_value(&*self.keyframes),
interpolation: self.interpolation,
}
}
}
impl VariableCurve {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
/// Creates a new curve from timestamps, keyframes, and interpolation type.
///
/// The two arrays must have the same length.
pub fn new<K>(
keyframe_timestamps: Vec<f32>,
keyframes: impl Into<K>,
interpolation: Interpolation,
) -> VariableCurve
where
K: Keyframes,
{
VariableCurve {
keyframe_timestamps,
keyframes: Box::new(keyframes.into()),
interpolation,
}
}
/// Creates a new curve from timestamps and keyframes with no interpolation.
///
/// The two arrays must have the same length.
pub fn step<K>(
keyframe_timestamps: impl Into<Vec<f32>>,
keyframes: impl Into<K>,
) -> VariableCurve
where
K: Keyframes,
{
VariableCurve::new(keyframe_timestamps.into(), keyframes, Interpolation::Step)
}
/// Creates a new curve from timestamps and keyframes with linear
/// interpolation.
///
/// The two arrays must have the same length.
pub fn linear<K>(
keyframe_timestamps: impl Into<Vec<f32>>,
keyframes: impl Into<K>,
) -> VariableCurve
where
K: Keyframes,
{
VariableCurve::new(keyframe_timestamps.into(), keyframes, Interpolation::Linear)
}
/// Creates a new curve from timestamps and keyframes with no interpolation.
///
/// The two arrays must have the same length.
pub fn cubic_spline<K>(
keyframe_timestamps: impl Into<Vec<f32>>,
keyframes: impl Into<K>,
) -> VariableCurve
where
K: Keyframes,
{
VariableCurve::new(
keyframe_timestamps.into(),
keyframes,
Interpolation::CubicSpline,
)
}
/// Find the index of the keyframe at or before the current time.
///
/// Returns [`None`] if the curve is finished or not yet started.
/// To be more precise, this returns [`None`] if the frame is at or past the last keyframe:
/// we cannot get the *next* keyframe to interpolate to in that case.
pub fn find_current_keyframe(&self, seek_time: f32) -> Option<usize> {
// An Ok(keyframe_index) result means an exact result was found by binary search
// An Err result means the keyframe was not found, and the index is the keyframe
// PERF: finding the current keyframe can be optimised
let search_result = self
.keyframe_timestamps
.binary_search_by(|probe| probe.partial_cmp(&seek_time).unwrap());
// Subtract one for zero indexing!
let last_keyframe = self.keyframe_timestamps.len() - 1;
// We want to find the index of the keyframe before the current time
// If the keyframe is past the second-to-last keyframe, the animation cannot be interpolated.
let step_start = match search_result {
// An exact match was found, and it is the last keyframe (or something has gone terribly wrong).
// This means that the curve is finished.
Ok(n) if n >= last_keyframe => return None,
// An exact match was found, and it is not the last keyframe.
Ok(i) => i,
// No exact match was found, and the seek_time is before the start of the animation.
// This occurs because the binary search returns the index of where we could insert a value
// without disrupting the order of the vector.
// If the value is less than the first element, the index will be 0.
Err(0) => return None,
// No exact match was found, and it was after the last keyframe.
// The curve is finished.
Err(n) if n > last_keyframe => return None,
// No exact match was found, so return the previous keyframe to interpolate from.
Err(i) => i - 1,
};
// Consumers need to be able to interpolate between the return keyframe and the next
assert!(step_start < self.keyframe_timestamps.len());
Some(step_start)
}
/// Find the index of the keyframe at or before the current time.
///
/// Returns the first keyframe if the `seek_time` is before the first keyframe, and
/// the second-to-last keyframe if the `seek_time` is after the last keyframe.
/// Panics if there are less than 2 keyframes.
pub fn find_interpolation_start_keyframe(&self, seek_time: f32) -> usize {
// An Ok(keyframe_index) result means an exact result was found by binary search
// An Err result means the keyframe was not found, and the index is the keyframe
// PERF: finding the current keyframe can be optimised
let search_result = self
.keyframe_timestamps
.binary_search_by(|probe| probe.partial_cmp(&seek_time).unwrap());
// We want to find the index of the keyframe before the current time
// If the keyframe is past the second-to-last keyframe, the animation cannot be interpolated.
match search_result {
// An exact match was found
Ok(i) => i.clamp(0, self.keyframe_timestamps.len() - 2),
// No exact match was found, so return the previous keyframe to interpolate from.
Err(i) => (i.saturating_sub(1)).clamp(0, self.keyframe_timestamps.len() - 2),
}
}
}
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
// We have to implement `PartialReflect` manually because of the embedded
// `Box<dyn Keyframes>`, which can't be automatically derived yet.
impl PartialReflect for VariableCurve {
#[inline]
fn get_represented_type_info(&self) -> Option<&'static TypeInfo> {
Some(<Self as Typed>::type_info())
}
#[inline]
fn into_partial_reflect(self: Box<Self>) -> Box<dyn PartialReflect> {
self
}
#[inline]
fn as_partial_reflect(&self) -> &dyn PartialReflect {
self
}
#[inline]
fn as_partial_reflect_mut(&mut self) -> &mut dyn PartialReflect {
self
}
fn try_into_reflect(self: Box<Self>) -> Result<Box<dyn Reflect>, Box<dyn PartialReflect>> {
Ok(self)
}
#[inline]
fn try_as_reflect(&self) -> Option<&dyn Reflect> {
Some(self)
}
#[inline]
fn try_as_reflect_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut dyn Reflect> {
Some(self)
}
fn try_apply(&mut self, value: &dyn PartialReflect) -> Result<(), ApplyError> {
if let ReflectRef::Struct(struct_value) = value.reflect_ref() {
for (i, value) in struct_value.iter_fields().enumerate() {
let name = struct_value.name_at(i).unwrap();
if let Some(v) = self.field_mut(name) {
v.try_apply(value)?;
}
}
} else {
return Err(ApplyError::MismatchedKinds {
from_kind: value.reflect_kind(),
to_kind: ReflectKind::Struct,
});
}
Ok(())
}
fn reflect_ref(&self) -> ReflectRef {
ReflectRef::Struct(self)
}
fn reflect_mut(&mut self) -> ReflectMut {
ReflectMut::Struct(self)
}
fn reflect_owned(self: Box<Self>) -> ReflectOwned {
ReflectOwned::Struct(self)
}
fn clone_value(&self) -> Box<dyn PartialReflect> {
Box::new((*self).clone())
}
}
// We have to implement `Reflect` manually because of the embedded `Box<dyn
// Keyframes>`, which can't be automatically derived yet.
impl Reflect for VariableCurve {
#[inline]
fn into_any(self: Box<Self>) -> Box<dyn Any> {
self
}
#[inline]
fn as_any(&self) -> &dyn Any {
self
}
#[inline]
fn as_any_mut(&mut self) -> &mut dyn Any {
self
}
#[inline]
fn into_reflect(self: Box<Self>) -> Box<dyn Reflect> {
self
}
#[inline]
fn as_reflect(&self) -> &dyn Reflect {
self
}
#[inline]
fn as_reflect_mut(&mut self) -> &mut dyn Reflect {
self
}
#[inline]
fn set(&mut self, value: Box<dyn Reflect>) -> Result<(), Box<dyn Reflect>> {
*self = value.take()?;
Ok(())
}
}
// We have to implement `Struct` manually because of the embedded `Box<dyn
// Keyframes>`, which can't be automatically derived yet.
impl Struct for VariableCurve {
fn field(&self, name: &str) -> Option<&dyn PartialReflect> {
match name {
"keyframe_timestamps" => Some(&self.keyframe_timestamps),
"keyframes" => Some(self.keyframes.as_partial_reflect()),
"interpolation" => Some(&self.interpolation),
_ => None,
}
}
fn field_mut(&mut self, name: &str) -> Option<&mut dyn PartialReflect> {
match name {
"keyframe_timestamps" => Some(&mut self.keyframe_timestamps),
"keyframes" => Some(self.keyframes.as_partial_reflect_mut()),
"interpolation" => Some(&mut self.interpolation),
_ => None,
}
}
fn field_at(&self, index: usize) -> Option<&dyn PartialReflect> {
match index {
0 => Some(&self.keyframe_timestamps),
1 => Some(self.keyframes.as_partial_reflect()),
2 => Some(&self.interpolation),
_ => None,
}
}
fn field_at_mut(&mut self, index: usize) -> Option<&mut dyn PartialReflect> {
match index {
0 => Some(&mut self.keyframe_timestamps),
1 => Some(self.keyframes.as_partial_reflect_mut()),
2 => Some(&mut self.interpolation),
_ => None,
}
}
fn name_at(&self, index: usize) -> Option<&str> {
match index {
0 => Some("keyframe_timestamps"),
1 => Some("keyframes"),
2 => Some("interpolation"),
_ => None,
}
}
fn field_len(&self) -> usize {
3
}
fn iter_fields(&self) -> FieldIter {
FieldIter::new(self)
}
fn clone_dynamic(&self) -> DynamicStruct {
DynamicStruct::from_iter([
(
"keyframe_timestamps",
Box::new(self.keyframe_timestamps.clone()) as Box<dyn PartialReflect>,
),
("keyframes", PartialReflect::clone_value(&*self.keyframes)),
(
"interpolation",
Box::new(self.interpolation) as Box<dyn PartialReflect>,
),
])
}
}
// We have to implement `FromReflect` manually because of the embedded `Box<dyn
// Keyframes>`, which can't be automatically derived yet.
impl FromReflect for VariableCurve {
fn from_reflect(reflect: &dyn PartialReflect) -> Option<Self> {
Some(reflect.try_downcast_ref::<VariableCurve>()?.clone())
}
}
// We have to implement `GetTypeRegistration` manually because of the embedded
// `Box<dyn Keyframes>`, which can't be automatically derived yet.
impl GetTypeRegistration for VariableCurve {
fn get_type_registration() -> TypeRegistration {
let mut registration = TypeRegistration::of::<Self>();
registration.insert::<ReflectFromPtr>(FromType::<Self>::from_type());
registration
}
}
// We have to implement `Typed` manually because of the embedded `Box<dyn
// Keyframes>`, which can't be automatically derived yet.
impl Typed for VariableCurve {
fn type_info() -> &'static TypeInfo {
static CELL: NonGenericTypeInfoCell = NonGenericTypeInfoCell::new();
CELL.get_or_set(|| {
TypeInfo::Struct(StructInfo::new::<Self>(&[
NamedField::new::<Vec<f32>>("keyframe_timestamps"),
NamedField::new::<()>("keyframes"),
NamedField::new::<Interpolation>("interpolation"),
]))
})
}
}
/// Interpolation method to use between keyframes.
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
#[derive(Reflect, Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub enum Interpolation {
/// Linear interpolation between the two closest keyframes.
Linear,
/// Step interpolation, the value of the start keyframe is used.
Step,
/// Cubic spline interpolation. The value of the two closest keyframes is used, with the out
/// tangent of the start keyframe and the in tangent of the end keyframe.
CubicSpline,
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// A list of [`VariableCurve`]s and the [`AnimationTargetId`]s to which they
/// apply.
///
/// Because animation clips refer to targets by UUID, they can target any
/// [`AnimationTarget`] with that ID.
Bevy Asset V2 (#8624) # Bevy Asset V2 Proposal ## Why Does Bevy Need A New Asset System? Asset pipelines are a central part of the gamedev process. Bevy's current asset system is missing a number of features that make it non-viable for many classes of gamedev. After plenty of discussions and [a long community feedback period](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/3972), we've identified a number missing features: * **Asset Preprocessing**: it should be possible to "preprocess" / "compile" / "crunch" assets at "development time" rather than when the game starts up. This enables offloading expensive work from deployed apps, faster asset loading, less runtime memory usage, etc. * **Per-Asset Loader Settings**: Individual assets cannot define their own loaders that override the defaults. Additionally, they cannot provide per-asset settings to their loaders. This is a huge limitation, as many asset types don't provide all information necessary for Bevy _inside_ the asset. For example, a raw PNG image says nothing about how it should be sampled (ex: linear vs nearest). * **Asset `.meta` files**: assets should have configuration files stored adjacent to the asset in question, which allows the user to configure asset-type-specific settings. These settings should be accessible during the pre-processing phase. Modifying a `.meta` file should trigger a re-processing / re-load of the asset. It should be possible to configure asset loaders from the meta file. * **Processed Asset Hot Reloading**: Changes to processed assets (or their dependencies) should result in re-processing them and re-loading the results in live Bevy Apps. * **Asset Dependency Tracking**: The current bevy_asset has no good way to wait for asset dependencies to load. It punts this as an exercise for consumers of the loader apis, which is unreasonable and error prone. There should be easy, ergonomic ways to wait for assets to load and block some logic on an asset's entire dependency tree loading. * **Runtime Asset Loading**: it should be (optionally) possible to load arbitrary assets dynamically at runtime. This necessitates being able to deploy and run the asset server alongside Bevy Apps on _all platforms_. For example, we should be able to invoke the shader compiler at runtime, stream scenes from sources like the internet, etc. To keep deployed binaries (and startup times) small, the runtime asset server configuration should be configurable with different settings compared to the "pre processor asset server". * **Multiple Backends**: It should be possible to load assets from arbitrary sources (filesystems, the internet, remote asset serves, etc). * **Asset Packing**: It should be possible to deploy assets in compressed "packs", which makes it easier and more efficient to distribute assets with Bevy Apps. * **Asset Handoff**: It should be possible to hold a "live" asset handle, which correlates to runtime data, without actually holding the asset in memory. Ex: it must be possible to hold a reference to a GPU mesh generated from a "mesh asset" without keeping the mesh data in CPU memory * **Per-Platform Processed Assets**: Different platforms and app distributions have different capabilities and requirements. Some platforms need lower asset resolutions or different asset formats to operate within the hardware constraints of the platform. It should be possible to define per-platform asset processing profiles. And it should be possible to deploy only the assets required for a given platform. These features have architectural implications that are significant enough to require a full rewrite. The current Bevy Asset implementation got us this far, but it can take us no farther. This PR defines a brand new asset system that implements most of these features, while laying the foundations for the remaining features to be built. ## Bevy Asset V2 Here is a quick overview of the features introduced in this PR. * **Asset Preprocessing**: Preprocess assets at development time into more efficient (and configurable) representations * **Dependency Aware**: Dependencies required to process an asset are tracked. If an asset's processed dependency changes, it will be reprocessed * **Hot Reprocessing/Reloading**: detect changes to asset source files, reprocess them if they have changed, and then hot-reload them in Bevy Apps. * **Only Process Changes**: Assets are only re-processed when their source file (or meta file) has changed. This uses hashing and timestamps to avoid processing assets that haven't changed. * **Transactional and Reliable**: Uses write-ahead logging (a technique commonly used by databases) to recover from crashes / forced-exits. Whenever possible it avoids full-reprocessing / only uncompleted transactions will be reprocessed. When the processor is running in parallel with a Bevy App, processor asset writes block Bevy App asset reads. Reading metadata + asset bytes is guaranteed to be transactional / correctly paired. * **Portable / Run anywhere / Database-free**: The processor does not rely on an in-memory database (although it uses some database techniques for reliability). This is important because pretty much all in-memory databases have unsupported platforms or build complications. * **Configure Processor Defaults Per File Type**: You can say "use this processor for all files of this type". * **Custom Processors**: The `Processor` trait is flexible and unopinionated. It can be implemented by downstream plugins. * **LoadAndSave Processors**: Most asset processing scenarios can be expressed as "run AssetLoader A, save the results using AssetSaver X, and then load the result using AssetLoader B". For example, load this png image using `PngImageLoader`, which produces an `Image` asset and then save it using `CompressedImageSaver` (which also produces an `Image` asset, but in a compressed format), which takes an `Image` asset as input. This means if you have an `AssetLoader` for an asset, you are already half way there! It also means that you can share AssetSavers across multiple loaders. Because `CompressedImageSaver` accepts Bevy's generic Image asset as input, it means you can also use it with some future `JpegImageLoader`. * **Loader and Saver Settings**: Asset Loaders and Savers can now define their own settings types, which are passed in as input when an asset is loaded / saved. Each asset can define its own settings. * **Asset `.meta` files**: configure asset loaders, their settings, enable/disable processing, and configure processor settings * **Runtime Asset Dependency Tracking** Runtime asset dependencies (ex: if an asset contains a `Handle<Image>`) are tracked by the asset server. An event is emitted when an asset and all of its dependencies have been loaded * **Unprocessed Asset Loading**: Assets do not require preprocessing. They can be loaded directly. A processed asset is just a "normal" asset with some extra metadata. Asset Loaders don't need to know or care about whether or not an asset was processed. * **Async Asset IO**: Asset readers/writers use async non-blocking interfaces. Note that because Rust doesn't yet support async traits, there is a bit of manual Boxing / Future boilerplate. This will hopefully be removed in the near future when Rust gets async traits. * **Pluggable Asset Readers and Writers**: Arbitrary asset source readers/writers are supported, both by the processor and the asset server. * **Better Asset Handles** * **Single Arc Tree**: Asset Handles now use a single arc tree that represents the lifetime of the asset. This makes their implementation simpler, more efficient, and allows us to cheaply attach metadata to handles. Ex: the AssetPath of a handle is now directly accessible on the handle itself! * **Const Typed Handles**: typed handles can be constructed in a const context. No more weird "const untyped converted to typed at runtime" patterns! * **Handles and Ids are Smaller / Faster To Hash / Compare**: Typed `Handle<T>` is now much smaller in memory and `AssetId<T>` is even smaller. * **Weak Handle Usage Reduction**: In general Handles are now considered to be "strong". Bevy features that previously used "weak `Handle<T>`" have been ported to `AssetId<T>`, which makes it statically clear that the features do not hold strong handles (while retaining strong type information). Currently Handle::Weak still exists, but it is very possible that we can remove that entirely. * **Efficient / Dense Asset Ids**: Assets now have efficient dense runtime asset ids, which means we can avoid expensive hash lookups. Assets are stored in Vecs instead of HashMaps. There are now typed and untyped ids, which means we no longer need to store dynamic type information in the ID for typed handles. "AssetPathId" (which was a nightmare from a performance and correctness standpoint) has been entirely removed in favor of dense ids (which are retrieved for a path on load) * **Direct Asset Loading, with Dependency Tracking**: Assets that are defined at runtime can still have their dependencies tracked by the Asset Server (ex: if you create a material at runtime, you can still wait for its textures to load). This is accomplished via the (currently optional) "asset dependency visitor" trait. This system can also be used to define a set of assets to load, then wait for those assets to load. * **Async folder loading**: Folder loading also uses this system and immediately returns a handle to the LoadedFolder asset, which means folder loading no longer blocks on directory traversals. * **Improved Loader Interface**: Loaders now have a specific "top level asset type", which makes returning the top-level asset simpler and statically typed. * **Basic Image Settings and Processing**: Image assets can now be processed into the gpu-friendly Basic Universal format. The ImageLoader now has a setting to define what format the image should be loaded as. Note that this is just a minimal MVP ... plenty of additional work to do here. To demo this, enable the `basis-universal` feature and turn on asset processing. * **Simpler Audio Play / AudioSink API**: Asset handle providers are cloneable, which means the Audio resource can mint its own handles. This means you can now do `let sink_handle = audio.play(music)` instead of `let sink_handle = audio_sinks.get_handle(audio.play(music))`. Note that this might still be replaced by https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/8424. **Removed Handle Casting From Engine Features**: Ex: FontAtlases no longer use casting between handle types ## Using The New Asset System ### Normal Unprocessed Asset Loading By default the `AssetPlugin` does not use processing. It behaves pretty much the same way as the old system. If you are defining a custom asset, first derive `Asset`: ```rust #[derive(Asset)] struct Thing { value: String, } ``` Initialize the asset: ```rust app.init_asset:<Thing>() ``` Implement a new `AssetLoader` for it: ```rust #[derive(Default)] struct ThingLoader; #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Default)] pub struct ThingSettings { some_setting: bool, } impl AssetLoader for ThingLoader { type Asset = Thing; type Settings = ThingSettings; fn load<'a>( &'a self, reader: &'a mut Reader, settings: &'a ThingSettings, load_context: &'a mut LoadContext, ) -> BoxedFuture<'a, Result<Thing, anyhow::Error>> { Box::pin(async move { let mut bytes = Vec::new(); reader.read_to_end(&mut bytes).await?; // convert bytes to value somehow Ok(Thing { value }) }) } fn extensions(&self) -> &[&str] { &["thing"] } } ``` Note that this interface will get much cleaner once Rust gets support for async traits. `Reader` is an async futures_io::AsyncRead. You can stream bytes as they come in or read them all into a `Vec<u8>`, depending on the context. You can use `let handle = load_context.load(path)` to kick off a dependency load, retrieve a handle, and register the dependency for the asset. Then just register the loader in your Bevy app: ```rust app.init_asset_loader::<ThingLoader>() ``` Now just add your `Thing` asset files into the `assets` folder and load them like this: ```rust fn system(asset_server: Res<AssetServer>) { let handle = Handle<Thing> = asset_server.load("cool.thing"); } ``` You can check load states directly via the asset server: ```rust if asset_server.load_state(&handle) == LoadState::Loaded { } ``` You can also listen for events: ```rust fn system(mut events: EventReader<AssetEvent<Thing>>, handle: Res<SomeThingHandle>) { for event in events.iter() { if event.is_loaded_with_dependencies(&handle) { } } } ``` Note the new `AssetEvent::LoadedWithDependencies`, which only fires when the asset is loaded _and_ all dependencies (and their dependencies) have loaded. Unlike the old asset system, for a given asset path all `Handle<T>` values point to the same underlying Arc. This means Handles can cheaply hold more asset information, such as the AssetPath: ```rust // prints the AssetPath of the handle info!("{:?}", handle.path()) ``` ### Processed Assets Asset processing can be enabled via the `AssetPlugin`. When developing Bevy Apps with processed assets, do this: ```rust app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin::processed_dev())) ``` This runs the `AssetProcessor` in the background with hot-reloading. It reads assets from the `assets` folder, processes them, and writes them to the `.imported_assets` folder. Asset loads in the Bevy App will wait for a processed version of the asset to become available. If an asset in the `assets` folder changes, it will be reprocessed and hot-reloaded in the Bevy App. When deploying processed Bevy apps, do this: ```rust app.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin::processed())) ``` This does not run the `AssetProcessor` in the background. It behaves like `AssetPlugin::unprocessed()`, but reads assets from `.imported_assets`. When the `AssetProcessor` is running, it will populate sibling `.meta` files for assets in the `assets` folder. Meta files for assets that do not have a processor configured look like this: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", asset: Load( loader: "bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader", settings: ( format: FromExtension, ), ), ) ``` This is metadata for an image asset. For example, if you have `assets/my_sprite.png`, this could be the metadata stored at `assets/my_sprite.png.meta`. Meta files are totally optional. If no metadata exists, the default settings will be used. In short, this file says "load this asset with the ImageLoader and use the file extension to determine the image type". This type of meta file is supported in all AssetPlugin modes. If in `Unprocessed` mode, the asset (with the meta settings) will be loaded directly. If in `ProcessedDev` mode, the asset file will be copied directly to the `.imported_assets` folder. The meta will also be copied directly to the `.imported_assets` folder, but with one addition: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", processed_info: Some(( hash: 12415480888597742505, full_hash: 14344495437905856884, process_dependencies: [], )), asset: Load( loader: "bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader", settings: ( format: FromExtension, ), ), ) ``` `processed_info` contains `hash` (a direct hash of the asset and meta bytes), `full_hash` (a hash of `hash` and the hashes of all `process_dependencies`), and `process_dependencies` (the `path` and `full_hash` of every process_dependency). A "process dependency" is an asset dependency that is _directly_ used when processing the asset. Images do not have process dependencies, so this is empty. When the processor is enabled, you can use the `Process` metadata config: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", asset: Process( processor: "bevy_asset::processor::process::LoadAndSave<bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader, bevy_render::texture::compressed_image_saver::CompressedImageSaver>", settings: ( loader_settings: ( format: FromExtension, ), saver_settings: ( generate_mipmaps: true, ), ), ), ) ``` This configures the asset to use the `LoadAndSave` processor, which runs an AssetLoader and feeds the result into an AssetSaver (which saves the given Asset and defines a loader to load it with). (for terseness LoadAndSave will likely get a shorter/friendlier type name when [Stable Type Paths](#7184) lands). `LoadAndSave` is likely to be the most common processor type, but arbitrary processors are supported. `CompressedImageSaver` saves an `Image` in the Basis Universal format and configures the ImageLoader to load it as basis universal. The `AssetProcessor` will read this meta, run it through the LoadAndSave processor, and write the basis-universal version of the image to `.imported_assets`. The final metadata will look like this: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", processed_info: Some(( hash: 905599590923828066, full_hash: 9948823010183819117, process_dependencies: [], )), asset: Load( loader: "bevy_render::texture::image_loader::ImageLoader", settings: ( format: Format(Basis), ), ), ) ``` To try basis-universal processing out in Bevy examples, (for example `sprite.rs`), change `add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)` to `add_plugins(DefaultPlugins.set(AssetPlugin::processed_dev()))` and run with the `basis-universal` feature enabled: `cargo run --features=basis-universal --example sprite`. To create a custom processor, there are two main paths: 1. Use the `LoadAndSave` processor with an existing `AssetLoader`. Implement the `AssetSaver` trait, register the processor using `asset_processor.register_processor::<LoadAndSave<ImageLoader, CompressedImageSaver>>(image_saver.into())`. 2. Implement the `Process` trait directly and register it using: `asset_processor.register_processor(thing_processor)`. You can configure default processors for file extensions like this: ```rust asset_processor.set_default_processor::<ThingProcessor>("thing") ``` There is one more metadata type to be aware of: ```rust ( meta_format_version: "1.0", asset: Ignore, ) ``` This will ignore the asset during processing / prevent it from being written to `.imported_assets`. The AssetProcessor stores a transaction log at `.imported_assets/log` and uses it to gracefully recover from unexpected stops. This means you can force-quit the processor (and Bevy Apps running the processor in parallel) at arbitrary times! `.imported_assets` is "local state". It should _not_ be checked into source control. It should also be considered "read only". In practice, you _can_ modify processed assets and processed metadata if you really need to test something. But those modifications will not be represented in the hashes of the assets, so the processed state will be "out of sync" with the source assets. The processor _will not_ fix this for you. Either revert the change after you have tested it, or delete the processed files so they can be re-populated. ## Open Questions There are a number of open questions to be discussed. We should decide if they need to be addressed in this PR and if so, how we will address them: ### Implied Dependencies vs Dependency Enumeration There are currently two ways to populate asset dependencies: * **Implied via AssetLoaders**: if an AssetLoader loads an asset (and retrieves a handle), a dependency is added to the list. * **Explicit via the optional Asset::visit_dependencies**: if `server.load_asset(my_asset)` is called, it will call `my_asset.visit_dependencies`, which will grab dependencies that have been manually defined for the asset via the Asset trait impl (which can be derived). This means that defining explicit dependencies is optional for "loaded assets". And the list of dependencies is always accurate because loaders can only produce Handles if they register dependencies. If an asset was loaded with an AssetLoader, it only uses the implied dependencies. If an asset was created at runtime and added with `asset_server.load_asset(MyAsset)`, it will use `Asset::visit_dependencies`. However this can create a behavior mismatch between loaded assets and equivalent "created at runtime" assets if `Assets::visit_dependencies` doesn't exactly match the dependencies produced by the AssetLoader. This behavior mismatch can be resolved by completely removing "implied loader dependencies" and requiring `Asset::visit_dependencies` to supply dependency data. But this creates two problems: * It makes defining loaded assets harder and more error prone: Devs must remember to manually annotate asset dependencies with `#[dependency]` when deriving `Asset`. For more complicated assets (such as scenes), the derive likely wouldn't be sufficient and a manual `visit_dependencies` impl would be required. * Removes the ability to immediately kick off dependency loads: When AssetLoaders retrieve a Handle, they also immediately kick off an asset load for the handle, which means it can start loading in parallel _before_ the asset finishes loading. For large assets, this could be significant. (although this could be mitigated for processed assets if we store dependencies in the processed meta file and load them ahead of time) ### Eager ProcessorDev Asset Loading I made a controversial call in the interest of fast startup times ("time to first pixel") for the "processor dev mode configuration". When initializing the AssetProcessor, current processed versions of unchanged assets are yielded immediately, even if their dependencies haven't been checked yet for reprocessing. This means that non-current-state-of-filesystem-but-previously-valid assets might be returned to the App first, then hot-reloaded if/when their dependencies change and the asset is reprocessed. Is this behavior desirable? There is largely one alternative: do not yield an asset from the processor to the app until all of its dependencies have been checked for changes. In some common cases (load dependency has not changed since last run) this will increase startup time. The main question is "by how much" and is that slower startup time worth it in the interest of only yielding assets that are true to the current state of the filesystem. Should this be configurable? I'm starting to think we should only yield an asset after its (historical) dependencies have been checked for changes + processed as necessary, but I'm curious what you all think. ### Paths Are Currently The Only Canonical ID / Do We Want Asset UUIDs? In this implementation AssetPaths are the only canonical asset identifier (just like the previous Bevy Asset system and Godot). Moving assets will result in re-scans (and currently reprocessing, although reprocessing can easily be avoided with some changes). Asset renames/moves will break code and assets that rely on specific paths, unless those paths are fixed up. Do we want / need "stable asset uuids"? Introducing them is very possible: 1. Generate a UUID and include it in .meta files 2. Support UUID in AssetPath 3. Generate "asset indices" which are loaded on startup and map UUIDs to paths. 4 (maybe). Consider only supporting UUIDs for processed assets so we can generate quick-to-load indices instead of scanning meta files. The main "pro" is that assets referencing UUIDs don't need to be migrated when a path changes. The main "con" is that UUIDs cannot be "lazily resolved" like paths. They need a full view of all assets to answer the question "does this UUID exist". Which means UUIDs require the AssetProcessor to fully finish startup scans before saying an asset doesnt exist. And they essentially require asset pre-processing to use in apps, because scanning all asset metadata files at runtime to resolve a UUID is not viable for medium-to-large apps. It really requires a pre-generated UUID index, which must be loaded before querying for assets. I personally think this should be investigated in a separate PR. Paths aren't going anywhere ... _everyone_ uses filesystems (and filesystem-like apis) to manage their asset source files. I consider them permanent canonical asset information. Additionally, they behave well for both processed and unprocessed asset modes. Given that Bevy is supporting both, this feels like the right canonical ID to start with. UUIDS (and maybe even other indexed-identifier types) can be added later as necessary. ### Folder / File Naming Conventions All asset processing config currently lives in the `.imported_assets` folder. The processor transaction log is in `.imported_assets/log`. Processed assets are added to `.imported_assets/Default`, which will make migrating to processed asset profiles (ex: a `.imported_assets/Mobile` profile) a non-breaking change. It also allows us to create top-level files like `.imported_assets/log` without it being interpreted as an asset. Meta files currently have a `.meta` suffix. Do we like these names and conventions? ### Should the `AssetPlugin::processed_dev` configuration enable `watch_for_changes` automatically? Currently it does (which I think makes sense), but it does make it the only configuration that enables watch_for_changes by default. ### Discuss on_loaded High Level Interface: This PR includes a very rough "proof of concept" `on_loaded` system adapter that uses the `LoadedWithDependencies` event in combination with `asset_server.load_asset` dependency tracking to support this pattern ```rust fn main() { App::new() .init_asset::<MyAssets>() .add_systems(Update, on_loaded(create_array_texture)) .run(); } #[derive(Asset, Clone)] struct MyAssets { #[dependency] picture_of_my_cat: Handle<Image>, #[dependency] picture_of_my_other_cat: Handle<Image>, } impl FromWorld for ArrayTexture { fn from_world(world: &mut World) -> Self { picture_of_my_cat: server.load("meow.png"), picture_of_my_other_cat: server.load("meeeeeeeow.png"), } } fn spawn_cat(In(my_assets): In<MyAssets>, mut commands: Commands) { commands.spawn(SpriteBundle { texture: my_assets.picture_of_my_cat.clone(), ..default() }); commands.spawn(SpriteBundle { texture: my_assets.picture_of_my_other_cat.clone(), ..default() }); } ``` The implementation is _very_ rough. And it is currently unsafe because `bevy_ecs` doesn't expose some internals to do this safely from inside `bevy_asset`. There are plenty of unanswered questions like: * "do we add a Loadable" derive? (effectively automate the FromWorld implementation above) * Should `MyAssets` even be an Asset? (largely implemented this way because it elegantly builds on `server.load_asset(MyAsset { .. })` dependency tracking). We should think hard about what our ideal API looks like (and if this is a pattern we want to support). Not necessarily something we need to solve in this PR. The current `on_loaded` impl should probably be removed from this PR before merging. ## Clarifying Questions ### What about Assets as Entities? This Bevy Asset V2 proposal implementation initially stored Assets as ECS Entities. Instead of `AssetId<T>` + the `Assets<T>` resource it used `Entity` as the asset id and Asset values were just ECS components. There are plenty of compelling reasons to do this: 1. Easier to inline assets in Bevy Scenes (as they are "just" normal entities + components) 2. More flexible queries: use the power of the ECS to filter assets (ex: `Query<Mesh, With<Tree>>`). 3. Extensible. Users can add arbitrary component data to assets. 4. Things like "component visualization tools" work out of the box to visualize asset data. However Assets as Entities has a ton of caveats right now: * We need to be able to allocate entity ids without a direct World reference (aka rework id allocator in Entities ... i worked around this in my prototypes by just pre allocating big chunks of entities) * We want asset change events in addition to ECS change tracking ... how do we populate them when mutations can come from anywhere? Do we use Changed queries? This would require iterating over the change data for all assets every frame. Is this acceptable or should we implement a new "event based" component change detection option? * Reconciling manually created assets with asset-system managed assets has some nuance (ex: are they "loaded" / do they also have that component metadata?) * "how do we handle "static" / default entity handles" (ties in to the Entity Indices discussion: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/discussions/8319). This is necessary for things like "built in" assets and default handles in things like SpriteBundle. * Storing asset information as a component makes it easy to "invalidate" asset state by removing the component (or forcing modifications). Ideally we have ways to lock this down (some combination of Rust type privacy and ECS validation) In practice, how we store and identify assets is a reasonably superficial change (porting off of Assets as Entities and implementing dedicated storage + ids took less than a day). So once we sort out the remaining challenges the flip should be straightforward. Additionally, I do still have "Assets as Entities" in my commit history, so we can reuse that work. I personally think "assets as entities" is a good endgame, but it also doesn't provide _significant_ value at the moment and it certainly isn't ready yet with the current state of things. ### Why not Distill? [Distill](https://github.com/amethyst/distill) is a high quality fully featured asset system built in Rust. It is very natural to ask "why not just use Distill?". It is also worth calling out that for awhile, [we planned on adopting Distill / I signed off on it](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/708). However I think Bevy has a number of constraints that make Distill adoption suboptimal: * **Architectural Simplicity:** * Distill's processor requires an in-memory database (lmdb) and RPC networked API (using Cap'n Proto). Each of these introduces API complexity that increases maintenance burden and "code grokability". Ignoring tests, documentation, and examples, Distill has 24,237 lines of Rust code (including generated code for RPC + database interactions). If you ignore generated code, it has 11,499 lines. * Bevy builds the AssetProcessor and AssetServer using pluggable AssetReader/AssetWriter Rust traits with simple io interfaces. They do not necessitate databases or RPC interfaces (although Readers/Writers could use them if that is desired). Bevy Asset V2 (at the time of writing this PR) is 5,384 lines of Rust code (ignoring tests, documentation, and examples). Grain of salt: Distill does have more features currently (ex: Asset Packing, GUIDS, remote-out-of-process asset processor). I do plan to implement these features in Bevy Asset V2 and I personally highly doubt they will meaningfully close the 6115 lines-of-code gap. * This complexity gap (which while illustrated by lines of code, is much bigger than just that) is noteworthy to me. Bevy should be hackable and there are pillars of Distill that are very hard to understand and extend. This is a matter of opinion (and Bevy Asset V2 also has complicated areas), but I think Bevy Asset V2 is much more approachable for the average developer. * Necessary disclaimer: counting lines of code is an extremely rough complexity metric. Read the code and form your own opinions. * **Optional Asset Processing:** Not all Bevy Apps (or Bevy App developers) need / want asset preprocessing. Processing increases the complexity of the development environment by introducing things like meta files, imported asset storage, running processors in the background, waiting for processing to finish, etc. Distill _requires_ preprocessing to work. With Bevy Asset V2 processing is fully opt-in. The AssetServer isn't directly aware of asset processors at all. AssetLoaders only care about converting bytes to runtime Assets ... they don't know or care if the bytes were pre-processed or not. Processing is "elegantly" (forgive my self-congratulatory phrasing) layered on top and builds on the existing Asset system primitives. * **Direct Filesystem Access to Processed Asset State:** Distill stores processed assets in a database. This makes debugging / inspecting the processed outputs harder (either requires special tooling to query the database or they need to be "deployed" to be inspected). Bevy Asset V2, on the other hand, stores processed assets in the filesystem (by default ... this is configurable). This makes interacting with the processed state more natural. Note that both Godot and Unity's new asset system store processed assets in the filesystem. * **Portability**: Because Distill's processor uses lmdb and RPC networking, it cannot be run on certain platforms (ex: lmdb is a non-rust dependency that cannot run on the web, some platforms don't support running network servers). Bevy should be able to process assets everywhere (ex: run the Bevy Editor on the web, compile + process shaders on mobile, etc). Distill does partially mitigate this problem by supporting "streaming" assets via the RPC protocol, but this is not a full solve from my perspective. And Bevy Asset V2 can (in theory) also stream assets (without requiring RPC, although this isn't implemented yet) Note that I _do_ still think Distill would be a solid asset system for Bevy. But I think the approach in this PR is a better solve for Bevy's specific "asset system requirements". ### Doesn't async-fs just shim requests to "sync" `std::fs`? What is the point? "True async file io" has limited / spotty platform support. async-fs (and the rust async ecosystem generally ... ex Tokio) currently use async wrappers over std::fs that offload blocking requests to separate threads. This may feel unsatisfying, but it _does_ still provide value because it prevents our task pools from blocking on file system operations (which would prevent progress when there are many tasks to do, but all threads in a pool are currently blocking on file system ops). Additionally, using async APIs for our AssetReaders and AssetWriters also provides value because we can later add support for "true async file io" for platforms that support it. _And_ we can implement other "true async io" asset backends (such as networked asset io). ## Draft TODO - [x] Fill in missing filesystem event APIs: file removed event (which is expressed as dangling RenameFrom events in some cases), file/folder renamed event - [x] Assets without loaders are not moved to the processed folder. This breaks things like referenced `.bin` files for GLTFs. This should be configurable per-non-asset-type. - [x] Initial implementation of Reflect and FromReflect for Handle. The "deserialization" parity bar is low here as this only worked with static UUIDs in the old impl ... this is a non-trivial problem. Either we add a Handle::AssetPath variant that gets "upgraded" to a strong handle on scene load or we use a separate AssetRef type for Bevy scenes (which is converted to a runtime Handle on load). This deserves its own discussion in a different pr. - [x] Populate read_asset_bytes hash when run by the processor (a bit of a special case .. when run by the processor the processed meta will contain the hash so we don't need to compute it on the spot, but we don't want/need to read the meta when run by the main AssetServer) - [x] Delay hot reloading: currently filesystem events are handled immediately, which creates timing issues in some cases. For example hot reloading images can sometimes break because the image isn't finished writing. We should add a delay, likely similar to the [implementation in this PR](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/8503). - [x] Port old platform-specific AssetIo implementations to the new AssetReader interface (currently missing Android and web) - [x] Resolve on_loaded unsafety (either by removing the API entirely or removing the unsafe) - [x] Runtime loader setting overrides - [x] Remove remaining unwraps that should be error-handled. There are number of TODOs here - [x] Pretty AssetPath Display impl - [x] Document more APIs - [x] Resolve spurious "reloading because it has changed" events (to repro run load_gltf with `processed_dev()`) - [x] load_dependency hot reloading currently only works for processed assets. If processing is disabled, load_dependency changes are not hot reloaded. - [x] Replace AssetInfo dependency load/fail counters with `loading_dependencies: HashSet<UntypedAssetId>` to prevent reloads from (potentially) breaking counters. Storing this will also enable "dependency reloaded" events (see [Next Steps](#next-steps)) - [x] Re-add filesystem watcher cargo feature gate (currently it is not optional) - [ ] Migration Guide - [ ] Changelog ## Followup TODO - [ ] Replace "eager unchanged processed asset loading" behavior with "don't returned unchanged processed asset until dependencies have been checked". - [ ] Add true `Ignore` AssetAction that does not copy the asset to the imported_assets folder. - [ ] Finish "live asset unloading" (ex: free up CPU asset memory after uploading an image to the GPU), rethink RenderAssets, and port renderer features. The `Assets` collection uses `Option<T>` for asset storage to support its removal. (1) the Option might not actually be necessary ... might be able to just remove from the collection entirely (2) need to finalize removal apis - [ ] Try replacing the "channel based" asset id recycling with something a bit more efficient (ex: we might be able to use raw atomic ints with some cleverness) - [ ] Consider adding UUIDs to processed assets (scoped just to helping identify moved assets ... not exposed to load queries ... see [Next Steps](#next-steps)) - [ ] Store "last modified" source asset and meta timestamps in processed meta files to enable skipping expensive hashing when the file wasn't changed - [ ] Fix "slow loop" handle drop fix - [ ] Migrate to TypeName - [x] Handle "loader preregistration". See #9429 ## Next Steps * **Configurable per-type defaults for AssetMeta**: It should be possible to add configuration like "all png image meta should default to using nearest sampling" (currently this hard-coded per-loader/processor Settings::default() impls). Also see the "Folder Meta" bullet point. * **Avoid Reprocessing on Asset Renames / Moves**: See the "canonical asset ids" discussion in [Open Questions](#open-questions) and the relevant bullet point in [Draft TODO](#draft-todo). Even without canonical ids, folder renames could avoid reprocessing in some cases. * **Multiple Asset Sources**: Expand AssetPath to support "asset source names" and support multiple AssetReaders in the asset server (ex: `webserver://some_path/image.png` backed by an Http webserver AssetReader). The "default" asset reader would use normal `some_path/image.png` paths. Ideally this works in combination with multiple AssetWatchers for hot-reloading * **Stable Type Names**: this pr removes the TypeUuid requirement from assets in favor of `std::any::type_name`. This makes defining assets easier (no need to generate a new uuid / use weird proc macro syntax). It also makes reading meta files easier (because things have "friendly names"). We also use type names for components in scene files. If they are good enough for components, they are good enough for assets. And consistency across Bevy pillars is desirable. However, `std::any::type_name` is not guaranteed to be stable (although in practice it is). We've developed a [stable type path](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7184) to resolve this, which should be adopted when it is ready. * **Command Line Interface**: It should be possible to run the asset processor in a separate process from the command line. This will also require building a network-server-backed AssetReader to communicate between the app and the processor. We've been planning to build a "bevy cli" for awhile. This seems like a good excuse to build it. * **Asset Packing**: This is largely an additive feature, so it made sense to me to punt this until we've laid the foundations in this PR. * **Per-Platform Processed Assets**: It should be possible to generate assets for multiple platforms by supporting multiple "processor profiles" per asset (ex: compress with format X on PC and Y on iOS). I think there should probably be arbitrary "profiles" (which can be separate from actual platforms), which are then assigned to a given platform when generating the final asset distribution for that platform. Ex: maybe devs want a "Mobile" profile that is shared between iOS and Android. Or a "LowEnd" profile shared between web and mobile. * **Versioning and Migrations**: Assets, Loaders, Savers, and Processors need to have versions to determine if their schema is valid. If an asset / loader version is incompatible with the current version expected at runtime, the processor should be able to migrate them. I think we should try using Bevy Reflect for this, as it would allow us to load the old version as a dynamic Reflect type without actually having the old Rust type. It would also allow us to define "patches" to migrate between versions (Bevy Reflect devs are currently working on patching). The `.meta` file already has its own format version. Migrating that to new versions should also be possible. * **Real Copy-on-write AssetPaths**: Rust's actual Cow (clone-on-write type) currently used by AssetPath can still result in String clones that aren't actually necessary (cloning an Owned Cow clones the contents). Bevy's asset system requires cloning AssetPaths in a number of places, which result in actual clones of the internal Strings. This is not efficient. AssetPath internals should be reworked to exhibit truer cow-like-behavior that reduces String clones to the absolute minimum. * **Consider processor-less processing**: In theory the AssetServer could run processors "inline" even if the background AssetProcessor is disabled. If we decide this is actually desirable, we could add this. But I don't think its a priority in the short or medium term. * **Pre-emptive dependency loading**: We could encode dependencies in processed meta files, which could then be used by the Asset Server to kick of dependency loads as early as possible (prior to starting the actual asset load). Is this desirable? How much time would this save in practice? * **Optimize Processor With UntypedAssetIds**: The processor exclusively uses AssetPath to identify assets currently. It might be possible to swap these out for UntypedAssetIds in some places, which are smaller / cheaper to hash and compare. * **One to Many Asset Processing**: An asset source file that produces many assets currently must be processed into a single "processed" asset source. If labeled assets can be written separately they can each have their own configured savers _and_ they could be loaded more granularly. Definitely worth exploring! * **Automatically Track "Runtime-only" Asset Dependencies**: Right now, tracking "created at runtime" asset dependencies requires adding them via `asset_server.load_asset(StandardMaterial::default())`. I think with some cleverness we could also do this for `materials.add(StandardMaterial::default())`, making tracking work "everywhere". There are challenges here relating to change detection / ensuring the server is made aware of dependency changes. This could be expensive in some cases. * **"Dependency Changed" events**: Some assets have runtime artifacts that need to be re-generated when one of their dependencies change (ex: regenerate a material's bind group when a Texture needs to change). We are generating the dependency graph so we can definitely produce these events. Buuuuut generating these events will have a cost / they could be high frequency for some assets, so we might want this to be opt-in for specific cases. * **Investigate Storing More Information In Handles**: Handles can now store arbitrary information, which makes it cheaper and easier to access. How much should we move into them? Canonical asset load states (via atomics)? (`handle.is_loaded()` would be very cool). Should we store the entire asset and remove the `Assets<T>` collection? (`Arc<RwLock<Option<Image>>>`?) * **Support processing and loading files without extensions**: This is a pretty arbitrary restriction and could be supported with very minimal changes. * **Folder Meta**: It would be nice if we could define per folder processor configuration defaults (likely in a `.meta` or `.folder_meta` file). Things like "default to linear filtering for all Images in this folder". * **Replace async_broadcast with event-listener?** This might be approximately drop-in for some uses and it feels more light weight * **Support Running the AssetProcessor on the Web**: Most of the hard work is done here, but there are some easy straggling TODOs (make the transaction log an interface instead of a direct file writer so we can write a web storage backend, implement an AssetReader/AssetWriter that reads/writes to something like LocalStorage). * **Consider identifying and preventing circular dependencies**: This is especially important for "processor dependencies", as processing will silently never finish in these cases. * **Built-in/Inlined Asset Hot Reloading**: This PR regresses "built-in/inlined" asset hot reloading (previously provided by the DebugAssetServer). I'm intentionally punting this because I think it can be cleanly implemented with "multiple asset sources" by registering a "debug asset source" (ex: `debug://bevy_pbr/src/render/pbr.wgsl` asset paths) in combination with an AssetWatcher for that asset source and support for "manually loading pats with asset bytes instead of AssetReaders". The old DebugAssetServer was quite nasty and I'd love to avoid that hackery going forward. * **Investigate ways to remove double-parsing meta files**: Parsing meta files currently involves parsing once with "minimal" versions of the meta file to extract the type name of the loader/processor config, then parsing again to parse the "full" meta. This is suboptimal. We should be able to define custom deserializers that (1) assume the loader/processor type name comes first (2) dynamically looks up the loader/processor registrations to deserialize settings in-line (similar to components in the bevy scene format). Another alternative: deserialize as dynamic Reflect objects and then convert. * **More runtime loading configuration**: Support using the Handle type as a hint to select an asset loader (instead of relying on AssetPath extensions) * **More high level Processor trait implementations**: For example, it might be worth adding support for arbitrary chains of "asset transforms" that modify an in-memory asset representation between loading and saving. (ex: load a Mesh, run a `subdivide_mesh` transform, followed by a `flip_normals` transform, then save the mesh to an efficient compressed format). * **Bevy Scene Handle Deserialization**: (see the relevant [Draft TODO item](#draft-todo) for context) * **Explore High Level Load Interfaces**: See [this discussion](#discuss-on_loaded-high-level-interface) for one prototype. * **Asset Streaming**: It would be great if we could stream Assets (ex: stream a long video file piece by piece) * **ID Exchanging**: In this PR Asset Handles/AssetIds are bigger than they need to be because they have a Uuid enum variant. If we implement an "id exchanging" system that trades Uuids for "efficient runtime ids", we can cut down on the size of AssetIds, making them more efficient. This has some open design questions, such as how to spawn entities with "default" handle values (as these wouldn't have access to the exchange api in the current system). * **Asset Path Fixup Tooling**: Assets that inline asset paths inside them will break when an asset moves. The asset system provides the functionality to detect when paths break. We should build a framework that enables formats to define "path migrations". This is especially important for scene files. For editor-generated files, we should also consider using UUIDs (see other bullet point) to avoid the need to migrate in these cases. --------- Co-authored-by: BeastLe9enD <beastle9end@outlook.de> Co-authored-by: Mike <mike.hsu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nicola Papale <nicopap@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-07 02:07:27 +00:00
#[derive(Asset, Reflect, Clone, Debug, Default)]
pub struct AnimationClip {
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
curves: AnimationCurves,
duration: f32,
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// A mapping from [`AnimationTargetId`] (e.g. bone in a skinned mesh) to the
/// animation curves.
pub type AnimationCurves = HashMap<AnimationTargetId, Vec<VariableCurve>, NoOpHash>;
/// A unique [UUID] for an animation target (e.g. bone in a skinned mesh).
///
/// The [`AnimationClip`] asset and the [`AnimationTarget`] component both use
/// this to refer to targets (e.g. bones in a skinned mesh) to be animated.
///
/// When importing an armature or an animation clip, asset loaders typically use
/// the full path name from the armature to the bone to generate these UUIDs.
/// The ID is unique to the full path name and based only on the names. So, for
/// example, any imported armature with a bone at the root named `Hips` will
/// assign the same [`AnimationTargetId`] to its root bone. Likewise, any
/// imported animation clip that animates a root bone named `Hips` will
/// reference the same [`AnimationTargetId`]. Any animation is playable on any
/// armature as long as the bone names match, which allows for easy animation
/// retargeting.
///
/// Note that asset loaders generally use the *full* path name to generate the
/// [`AnimationTargetId`]. Thus a bone named `Chest` directly connected to a
/// bone named `Hips` will have a different ID from a bone named `Chest` that's
/// connected to a bone named `Stomach`.
///
/// [UUID]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Reflect, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)]
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
pub struct AnimationTargetId(pub Uuid);
impl Hash for AnimationTargetId {
fn hash<H: Hasher>(&self, state: &mut H) {
let (hi, lo) = self.0.as_u64_pair();
state.write_u64(hi ^ lo);
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// An entity that can be animated by an [`AnimationPlayer`].
///
/// These are frequently referred to as *bones* or *joints*, because they often
/// refer to individually-animatable parts of an armature.
///
/// Asset loaders for armatures are responsible for adding these as necessary.
/// Typically, they're generated from hashed versions of the entire name path
/// from the root of the armature to the bone. See the [`AnimationTargetId`]
/// documentation for more details.
///
/// By convention, asset loaders add [`AnimationTarget`] components to the
/// descendants of an [`AnimationPlayer`], as well as to the [`AnimationPlayer`]
/// entity itself, but Bevy doesn't require this in any way. So, for example,
/// it's entirely possible for an [`AnimationPlayer`] to animate a target that
/// it isn't an ancestor of. If you add a new bone to or delete a bone from an
/// armature at runtime, you may want to update the [`AnimationTarget`]
/// component as appropriate, as Bevy won't do this automatically.
///
/// Note that each entity can only be animated by one animation player at a
/// time. However, you can change [`AnimationTarget`]'s `player` property at
/// runtime to change which player is responsible for animating the entity.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Component, Reflect)]
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
#[reflect(Component, MapEntities)]
pub struct AnimationTarget {
/// The ID of this animation target.
///
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// Typically, this is derived from the path.
pub id: AnimationTargetId,
/// The entity containing the [`AnimationPlayer`].
pub player: Entity,
}
impl AnimationClip {
#[inline]
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// [`VariableCurve`]s for each animation target. Indexed by the [`AnimationTargetId`].
pub fn curves(&self) -> &AnimationCurves {
&self.curves
}
#[inline]
/// Get mutable references of [`VariableCurve`]s for each animation target. Indexed by the [`AnimationTargetId`].
pub fn curves_mut(&mut self) -> &mut AnimationCurves {
&mut self.curves
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// Gets the curves for a single animation target.
///
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// Returns `None` if this clip doesn't animate the target.
#[inline]
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
pub fn curves_for_target(
&self,
target_id: AnimationTargetId,
) -> Option<&'_ Vec<VariableCurve>> {
self.curves.get(&target_id)
}
/// Gets mutable references of the curves for a single animation target.
///
/// Returns `None` if this clip doesn't animate the target.
#[inline]
pub fn curves_for_target_mut(
&mut self,
target_id: AnimationTargetId,
) -> Option<&'_ mut Vec<VariableCurve>> {
self.curves.get_mut(&target_id)
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// Duration of the clip, represented in seconds.
#[inline]
pub fn duration(&self) -> f32 {
self.duration
}
/// Set the duration of the clip in seconds.
#[inline]
pub fn set_duration(&mut self, duration_sec: f32) {
self.duration = duration_sec;
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// Adds a [`VariableCurve`] to an [`AnimationTarget`] named by an
/// [`AnimationTargetId`].
///
/// If the curve extends beyond the current duration of this clip, this
/// method lengthens this clip to include the entire time span that the
/// curve covers.
pub fn add_curve_to_target(&mut self, target_id: AnimationTargetId, curve: VariableCurve) {
// Update the duration of the animation by this curve duration if it's longer
self.duration = self
.duration
.max(*curve.keyframe_timestamps.last().unwrap_or(&0.0));
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
self.curves.entry(target_id).or_default().push(curve);
Add morph targets (#8158) # Objective - Add morph targets to `bevy_pbr` (closes #5756) & load them from glTF - Supersedes #3722 - Fixes #6814 [Morph targets][1] (also known as shape interpolation, shape keys, or blend shapes) allow animating individual vertices with fine grained controls. This is typically used for facial expressions. By specifying multiple poses as vertex offset, and providing a set of weight of each pose, it is possible to define surprisingly realistic transitions between poses. Blending between multiple poses also allow composition. Morph targets are part of the [gltf standard][2] and are a feature of Unity and Unreal, and babylone.js, it is only natural to implement them in bevy. ## Solution This implementation of morph targets uses a 3d texture where each pixel is a component of an animated attribute. Each layer is a different target. We use a 2d texture for each target, because the number of attribute×components×animated vertices is expected to always exceed the maximum pixel row size limit of webGL2. It copies fairly closely the way skinning is implemented on the CPU side, while on the GPU side, the shader morph target implementation is a relatively trivial detail. We add an optional `morph_texture` to the `Mesh` struct. The `morph_texture` is built through a method that accepts an iterator over attribute buffers. The `MorphWeights` component, user-accessible, controls the blend of poses used by mesh instances (so that multiple copy of the same mesh may have different weights), all the weights are uploaded to a uniform buffer of 256 `f32`. We limit to 16 poses per mesh, and a total of 256 poses. More literature: * Old babylone.js implementation (vertex attribute-based): https://www.eternalcoding.com/dev-log-1-morph-targets/ * Babylone.js implementation (similar to ours): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBPRmGgU0PE * GPU gems 3: https://developer.nvidia.com/gpugems/gpugems3/part-i-geometry/chapter-3-directx-10-blend-shapes-breaking-limits * Development discord thread https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1083325980615114772 https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26321040/231181046-3bca2ab2-d4d9-472e-8098-639f1871ce2e.mp4 https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/26321040/d2a0c544-0ef8-45cf-9f99-8c3792f5a258 ## Acknowledgements * Thanks to `storytold` for sponsoring the feature * Thanks to `superdump` and `james7132` for guidance and help figuring out stuff ## Future work - Handling of less and more attributes (eg: animated uv, animated arbitrary attributes) - Dynamic pose allocation (so that zero-weighted poses aren't uploaded to GPU for example, enables much more total poses) - Better animation API, see #8357 ---- ## Changelog - Add morph targets to bevy meshes - Support up to 64 poses per mesh of individually up to 116508 vertices, animation currently strictly limited to the position, normal and tangent attributes. - Load a morph target using `Mesh::set_morph_targets` - Add `VisitMorphTargets` and `VisitMorphAttributes` traits to `bevy_render`, this allows defining morph targets (a fairly complex and nested data structure) through iterators (ie: single copy instead of passing around buffers), see documentation of those traits for details - Add `MorphWeights` component exported by `bevy_render` - `MorphWeights` control mesh's morph target weights, blending between various poses defined as morph targets. - `MorphWeights` are directly inherited by direct children (single level of hierarchy) of an entity. This allows controlling several mesh primitives through a unique entity _as per GLTF spec_. - Add `MorphTargetNames` component, naming each indices of loaded morph targets. - Load morph targets weights and buffers in `bevy_gltf` - handle morph targets animations in `bevy_animation` (previously, it was a `warn!` log) - Add the `MorphStressTest.gltf` asset for morph targets testing, taken from the glTF samples repo, CC0. - Add morph target manipulation to `scene_viewer` - Separate the animation code in `scene_viewer` from the rest of the code, reducing `#[cfg(feature)]` noise - Add the `morph_targets.rs` example to show off how to manipulate morph targets, loading `MorpStressTest.gltf` ## Migration Guide - (very specialized, unlikely to be touched by 3rd parties) - `MeshPipeline` now has a single `mesh_layouts` field rather than separate `mesh_layout` and `skinned_mesh_layout` fields. You should handle all possible mesh bind group layouts in your implementation - You should also handle properly the new `MORPH_TARGETS` shader def and mesh pipeline key. A new function is exposed to make this easier: `setup_moprh_and_skinning_defs` - The `MeshBindGroup` is now `MeshBindGroups`, cached bind groups are now accessed through the `get` method. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morph_target_animation [2]: https://registry.khronos.org/glTF/specs/2.0/glTF-2.0.html#morph-targets --------- Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-22 20:00:01 +00:00
}
}
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
/// Repetition behavior of an animation.
#[derive(Reflect, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone, Default)]
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
pub enum RepeatAnimation {
/// The animation will finish after running once.
#[default]
Never,
/// The animation will finish after running "n" times.
Count(u32),
/// The animation will never finish.
Forever,
}
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
/// Why Bevy failed to evaluate an animation.
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub enum AnimationEvaluationError {
/// The `keyframes` array is too small.
///
/// For curves with `Interpolation::Step` or `Interpolation::Linear`, the
/// `keyframes` array must have at least as many elements as keyframe
/// timestamps. For curves with `Interpolation::CubicBezier`, the
/// `keyframes` array must have at least 3× the number of elements as
/// keyframe timestamps, in order to account for the tangents.
KeyframeNotPresent(usize),
/// The component to be animated isn't present on the animation target.
///
/// To fix this error, make sure the entity to be animated contains all
/// components that have animation curves.
ComponentNotPresent(TypeId),
/// The component to be animated was present, but the property on the
/// component wasn't present.
PropertyNotPresent(TypeId),
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// An animation that an [`AnimationPlayer`] is currently either playing or was
/// playing, but is presently paused.
///
/// An stopped animation is considered no longer active.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Reflect)]
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
pub struct ActiveAnimation {
/// The factor by which the weight from the [`AnimationGraph`] is multiplied.
weight: f32,
/// The actual weight of this animation this frame, taking the
/// [`AnimationGraph`] into account.
computed_weight: f32,
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
/// The mask groups that are masked out (i.e. won't be animated) this frame,
/// taking the `AnimationGraph` into account.
computed_mask: AnimationMask,
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
repeat: RepeatAnimation,
speed: f32,
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
/// Total time the animation has been played.
///
/// Note: Time does not increase when the animation is paused or after it has completed.
elapsed: f32,
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
/// The timestamp inside of the animation clip.
///
/// Note: This will always be in the range [0.0, animation clip duration]
seek_time: f32,
/// Number of times the animation has completed.
/// If the animation is playing in reverse, this increments when the animation passes the start.
completions: u32,
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
paused: bool,
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
impl Default for ActiveAnimation {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
weight: 1.0,
computed_weight: 1.0,
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
computed_mask: 0,
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
repeat: RepeatAnimation::default(),
speed: 1.0,
elapsed: 0.0,
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
seek_time: 0.0,
completions: 0,
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
paused: false,
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
}
}
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
impl ActiveAnimation {
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
/// Check if the animation has finished, based on its repetition behavior and the number of times it has repeated.
///
/// Note: An animation with `RepeatAnimation::Forever` will never finish.
#[inline]
pub fn is_finished(&self) -> bool {
match self.repeat {
RepeatAnimation::Forever => false,
RepeatAnimation::Never => self.completions >= 1,
RepeatAnimation::Count(n) => self.completions >= n,
}
}
/// Update the animation given the delta time and the duration of the clip being played.
#[inline]
fn update(&mut self, delta: f32, clip_duration: f32) {
if self.is_finished() {
return;
}
self.elapsed += delta;
self.seek_time += delta * self.speed;
let over_time = self.speed > 0.0 && self.seek_time >= clip_duration;
let under_time = self.speed < 0.0 && self.seek_time < 0.0;
if over_time || under_time {
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
self.completions += 1;
if self.is_finished() {
return;
}
}
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
if self.seek_time >= clip_duration {
self.seek_time %= clip_duration;
}
// Note: assumes delta is never lower than -clip_duration
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
if self.seek_time < 0.0 {
self.seek_time += clip_duration;
}
}
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
/// Reset back to the initial state as if no time has elapsed.
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
pub fn replay(&mut self) {
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
self.completions = 0;
self.elapsed = 0.0;
self.seek_time = 0.0;
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Returns the current weight of this animation.
pub fn weight(&self) -> f32 {
self.weight
}
/// Sets the weight of this animation.
pub fn set_weight(&mut self, weight: f32) -> &mut Self {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
self.weight = weight;
self
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
}
/// Pause the animation.
pub fn pause(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.paused = true;
self
}
/// Unpause the animation.
pub fn resume(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.paused = false;
self
}
/// Returns true if this animation is currently paused.
///
/// Note that paused animations are still [`ActiveAnimation`]s.
#[inline]
pub fn is_paused(&self) -> bool {
self.paused
}
/// Sets the repeat mode for this playing animation.
pub fn set_repeat(&mut self, repeat: RepeatAnimation) -> &mut Self {
self.repeat = repeat;
self
}
/// Marks this animation as repeating forever.
pub fn repeat(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Forever)
}
/// Returns the repeat mode assigned to this active animation.
pub fn repeat_mode(&self) -> RepeatAnimation {
self.repeat
}
/// Returns the number of times this animation has completed.
pub fn completions(&self) -> u32 {
self.completions
}
/// Returns true if the animation is playing in reverse.
pub fn is_playback_reversed(&self) -> bool {
self.speed < 0.0
}
/// Returns the speed of the animation playback.
pub fn speed(&self) -> f32 {
self.speed
}
/// Sets the speed of the animation playback.
pub fn set_speed(&mut self, speed: f32) -> &mut Self {
self.speed = speed;
self
}
/// Returns the amount of time the animation has been playing.
pub fn elapsed(&self) -> f32 {
self.elapsed
}
/// Returns the seek time of the animation.
///
/// This is nonnegative and no more than the clip duration.
pub fn seek_time(&self) -> f32 {
self.seek_time
}
/// Seeks to a specific time in the animation.
pub fn seek_to(&mut self, seek_time: f32) -> &mut Self {
self.seek_time = seek_time;
self
}
/// Seeks to the beginning of the animation.
pub fn rewind(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.seek_time = 0.0;
self
}
}
/// Animation controls.
///
/// Automatically added to any root animations of a `SceneBundle` when it is
/// spawned.
#[derive(Component, Default, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Component, Default)]
pub struct AnimationPlayer {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// We use a `BTreeMap` instead of a `HashMap` here to ensure a consistent
/// ordering when applying the animations.
active_animations: BTreeMap<AnimationNodeIndex, ActiveAnimation>,
blend_weights: HashMap<AnimationNodeIndex, f32>,
}
// This is needed since `#[derive(Clone)]` does not generate optimized `clone_from`.
impl Clone for AnimationPlayer {
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
Self {
active_animations: self.active_animations.clone(),
blend_weights: self.blend_weights.clone(),
}
}
fn clone_from(&mut self, source: &Self) {
self.active_animations.clone_from(&source.active_animations);
self.blend_weights.clone_from(&source.blend_weights);
}
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Information needed during the traversal of the animation graph in
/// [`advance_animations`].
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct AnimationGraphEvaluator {
/// The stack used for the depth-first search of the graph.
dfs_stack: Vec<NodeIndex>,
/// The list of visited nodes during the depth-first traversal.
dfs_visited: FixedBitSet,
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
/// Accumulated weights and masks for each node.
nodes: Vec<EvaluatedAnimationGraphNode>,
}
/// The accumulated weight and computed mask for a single node.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Default, Debug)]
struct EvaluatedAnimationGraphNode {
/// The weight that has been accumulated for this node, taking its
/// ancestors' weights into account.
weight: f32,
/// The mask that has been computed for this node, taking its ancestors'
/// masks into account.
mask: AnimationMask,
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
impl AnimationPlayer {
/// Start playing an animation, restarting it if necessary.
pub fn start(&mut self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> &mut ActiveAnimation {
let playing_animation = self.active_animations.entry(animation).or_default();
playing_animation.replay();
playing_animation
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Start playing an animation, unless the requested animation is already playing.
pub fn play(&mut self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> &mut ActiveAnimation {
self.active_animations.entry(animation).or_default()
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Stops playing the given animation, removing it from the list of playing
/// animations.
pub fn stop(&mut self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> &mut Self {
self.active_animations.remove(&animation);
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Stops all currently-playing animations.
pub fn stop_all(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
self.active_animations.clear();
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Iterates through all animations that this [`AnimationPlayer`] is
/// currently playing.
pub fn playing_animations(
&self,
) -> impl Iterator<Item = (&AnimationNodeIndex, &ActiveAnimation)> {
self.active_animations.iter()
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Iterates through all animations that this [`AnimationPlayer`] is
/// currently playing, mutably.
pub fn playing_animations_mut(
&mut self,
) -> impl Iterator<Item = (&AnimationNodeIndex, &mut ActiveAnimation)> {
self.active_animations.iter_mut()
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
}
#[deprecated = "Use `animation_is_playing` instead"]
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Check if the given animation node is being played.
pub fn is_playing_animation(&self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> bool {
self.active_animations.contains_key(&animation)
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Check if all playing animations have finished, according to the repetition behavior.
pub fn all_finished(&self) -> bool {
self.active_animations
.values()
.all(ActiveAnimation::is_finished)
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Check if all playing animations are paused.
#[doc(alias = "is_paused")]
pub fn all_paused(&self) -> bool {
self.active_animations
.values()
.all(ActiveAnimation::is_paused)
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Resume all playing animations.
#[doc(alias = "pause")]
pub fn pause_all(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
for (_, playing_animation) in self.playing_animations_mut() {
playing_animation.pause();
}
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Resume all active animations.
#[doc(alias = "resume")]
pub fn resume_all(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
for (_, playing_animation) in self.playing_animations_mut() {
playing_animation.resume();
}
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Rewinds all active animations.
#[doc(alias = "rewind")]
pub fn rewind_all(&mut self) -> &mut Self {
for (_, playing_animation) in self.playing_animations_mut() {
playing_animation.rewind();
}
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Multiplies the speed of all active animations by the given factor.
#[doc(alias = "set_speed")]
pub fn adjust_speeds(&mut self, factor: f32) -> &mut Self {
for (_, playing_animation) in self.playing_animations_mut() {
let new_speed = playing_animation.speed() * factor;
playing_animation.set_speed(new_speed);
}
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Seeks all active animations forward or backward by the same amount.
///
/// To seek forward, pass a positive value; to seek negative, pass a
/// negative value. Values below 0.0 or beyond the end of the animation clip
/// are clamped appropriately.
#[doc(alias = "seek_to")]
pub fn seek_all_by(&mut self, amount: f32) -> &mut Self {
for (_, playing_animation) in self.playing_animations_mut() {
let new_time = playing_animation.seek_time();
playing_animation.seek_to(new_time + amount);
}
self
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Returns the [`ActiveAnimation`] associated with the given animation
/// node if it's currently playing.
///
/// If the animation isn't currently active, returns `None`.
pub fn animation(&self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> Option<&ActiveAnimation> {
self.active_animations.get(&animation)
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Returns a mutable reference to the [`ActiveAnimation`] associated with
/// the given animation node if it's currently active.
///
/// If the animation isn't currently active, returns `None`.
pub fn animation_mut(&mut self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> Option<&mut ActiveAnimation> {
self.active_animations.get_mut(&animation)
}
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
/// Returns true if the animation is currently playing or paused, or false
/// if the animation is stopped.
pub fn animation_is_playing(&self, animation: AnimationNodeIndex) -> bool {
self.active_animations.contains_key(&animation)
API updates to the AnimationPlayer (#9002) # Objective Added `AnimationPlayer` API UX improvements. - Succestor to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/5912 - Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/5848 _(Credits to @asafigan for filing #5848, creating the initial pull request, and the discussion in #5912)_ ## Solution - Created `RepeatAnimation` enum to describe an animation repetition behavior. - Added `is_finished()`, `set_repeat()`, and `is_playback_reversed()` methods to the animation player. - ~~Made the animation clip optional as per the comment from #5912~~ > ~~My problem is that the default handle [used the initialize a `PlayingAnimation`] could actually refer to an actual animation if an AnimationClip is set for the default handle, which leads me to ask, "Should animation_clip should be an Option?"~~ - Added an accessor for the animation clip `animation_clip()` to the animation player. To determine if an animation is finished, we use the number of times the animation has completed and the repetition behavior. If the animation is playing in reverse then `elapsed < 0.0` counts as a completion. Otherwise, `elapsed > animation.duration` counts as a completion. This is what I would expect, personally. If there's any ambiguity, perhaps we could add some `AnimationCompletionBehavior`, to specify that kind of completion behavior to use. Update: Previously `PlayingAnimation::elapsed` was being used as the seek time into the animation clip. This was misleading because if you increased the speed of the animation it would also increase (or decrease) the elapsed time. In other words, the elapsed time was not actually the elapsed time. To solve this, we introduce `PlayingAnimation::seek_time` to serve as the value we manipulate the move between keyframes. Consequently, `elapsed()` now returns the actual elapsed time, and is not effected by the animation speed. Because `set_elapsed` was being used to manipulate the displayed keyframe, we introduce `AnimationPlayer::seek_to` and `AnimationPlayer::replay` to provide this functionality. ## Migration Guide - Removed `set_elapsed`. - Removed `stop_repeating` in favour of `AnimationPlayer::set_repeat(RepeatAnimation::Never)`. - Introduced `seek_to` to seek to a given timestamp inside of the animation. - Introduced `seek_time` accessor for the `PlayingAnimation::seek_to`. - Introduced `AnimationPlayer::replay` to reset the `PlayingAnimation` to a state where no time has elapsed. --------- Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 16:43:04 +00:00
}
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// A system that advances the time for all playing animations.
pub fn advance_animations(
time: Res<Time>,
animation_clips: Res<Assets<AnimationClip>>,
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
animation_graphs: Res<Assets<AnimationGraph>>,
mut players: Query<(&mut AnimationPlayer, &Handle<AnimationGraph>)>,
animation_graph_evaluator: Local<ThreadLocal<RefCell<AnimationGraphEvaluator>>>,
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
) {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
let delta_seconds = time.delta_seconds();
players
.par_iter_mut()
.for_each(|(mut player, graph_handle)| {
let Some(animation_graph) = animation_graphs.get(graph_handle) else {
return;
};
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
// Tick animations, and schedule them.
//
// We use a thread-local here so we can reuse allocations across
// frames.
let mut evaluator = animation_graph_evaluator.get_or_default().borrow_mut();
let AnimationPlayer {
ref mut active_animations,
ref blend_weights,
..
} = *player;
// Reset our state.
evaluator.reset(animation_graph.root, animation_graph.graph.node_count());
while let Some(node_index) = evaluator.dfs_stack.pop() {
// Skip if we've already visited this node.
if evaluator.dfs_visited.put(node_index.index()) {
continue;
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
let node = &animation_graph[node_index];
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
// Calculate weight and mask from the graph.
let (mut weight, mut mask) = (node.weight, node.mask);
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
for parent_index in animation_graph
.graph
.neighbors_directed(node_index, Direction::Incoming)
{
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
let evaluated_parent = &evaluator.nodes[parent_index.index()];
weight *= evaluated_parent.weight;
mask |= evaluated_parent.mask;
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
}
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
evaluator.nodes[node_index.index()] = EvaluatedAnimationGraphNode { weight, mask };
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
if let Some(active_animation) = active_animations.get_mut(&node_index) {
// Tick the animation if necessary.
if !active_animation.paused {
if let Some(ref clip_handle) = node.clip {
if let Some(clip) = animation_clips.get(clip_handle) {
active_animation.update(delta_seconds, clip.duration);
}
}
}
weight *= active_animation.weight;
} else if let Some(&blend_weight) = blend_weights.get(&node_index) {
weight *= blend_weight;
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
// Write in the computed weight and mask for this node.
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
if let Some(active_animation) = active_animations.get_mut(&node_index) {
active_animation.computed_weight = weight;
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
active_animation.computed_mask = mask;
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
}
// Push children.
evaluator.dfs_stack.extend(
animation_graph
.graph
.neighbors_directed(node_index, Direction::Outgoing),
);
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
});
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
/// A system that modifies animation targets (e.g. bones in a skinned mesh)
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
/// according to the currently-playing animations.
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
pub fn animate_targets(
clips: Res<Assets<AnimationClip>>,
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
graphs: Res<Assets<AnimationGraph>>,
players: Query<(&AnimationPlayer, &Handle<AnimationGraph>)>,
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
mut targets: Query<(
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
Option<&mut Transform>,
EntityMutExcept<(Transform, AnimationPlayer, Handle<AnimationGraph>)>,
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
)>,
) {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
// Evaluate all animation targets in parallel.
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
targets
Basic adaptive batching for parallel query iteration (#4777) # Objective Fixes #3184. Fixes #6640. Fixes #4798. Using `Query::par_for_each(_mut)` currently requires a `batch_size` parameter, which affects how it chunks up large archetypes and tables into smaller chunks to run in parallel. Tuning this value is difficult, as the performance characteristics entirely depends on the state of the `World` it's being run on. Typically, users will just use a flat constant and just tune it by hand until it performs well in some benchmarks. However, this is both error prone and risks overfitting the tuning on that benchmark. This PR proposes a naive automatic batch-size computation based on the current state of the `World`. ## Background `Query::par_for_each(_mut)` schedules a new Task for every archetype or table that it matches. Archetypes/tables larger than the batch size are chunked into smaller tasks. Assuming every entity matched by the query has an identical workload, this makes the worst case scenario involve using a batch size equal to the size of the largest matched archetype or table. Conversely, a batch size of `max {archetype, table} size / thread count * COUNT_PER_THREAD` is likely the sweetspot where the overhead of scheduling tasks is minimized, at least not without grouping small archetypes/tables together. There is also likely a strict minimum batch size below which the overhead of scheduling these tasks is heavier than running the entire thing single-threaded. ## Solution - [x] Remove the `batch_size` from `Query(State)::par_for_each` and friends. - [x] Add a check to compute `batch_size = max {archeytpe/table} size / thread count * COUNT_PER_THREAD` - [x] ~~Panic if thread count is 0.~~ Defer to `for_each` if the thread count is 1 or less. - [x] Early return if there is no matched table/archetype. - [x] Add override option for users have queries that strongly violate the initial assumption that all iterated entities have an equal workload. --- ## Changelog Changed: `Query::par_for_each(_mut)` has been changed to `Query::par_iter(_mut)` and will now automatically try to produce a batch size for callers based on the current `World` state. ## Migration Guide The `batch_size` parameter for `Query(State)::par_for_each(_mut)` has been removed. These calls will automatically compute a batch size for you. Remove these parameters from all calls to these functions. Before: ```rust fn parallel_system(query: Query<&MyComponent>) { query.par_for_each(32, |comp| { ... }); } ``` After: ```rust fn parallel_system(query: Query<&MyComponent>) { query.par_iter().for_each(|comp| { ... }); } ``` Co-authored-by: Arnav Choubey <56453634+x-52@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Robert Swain <robert.swain@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Corey Farwell <coreyf@rwell.org> Co-authored-by: Aevyrie <aevyrie@gmail.com>
2023-01-20 08:47:20 +00:00
.par_iter_mut()
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
.for_each(|(mut transform, mut entity_mut)| {
let Some(&AnimationTarget {
id: target_id,
player: player_id,
}) = entity_mut.get::<AnimationTarget>()
else {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
return;
};
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let (animation_player, animation_graph_id) =
if let Ok((player, graph_handle)) = players.get(player_id) {
(player, graph_handle.id())
} else {
trace!(
"Either an animation player {:?} or a graph was missing for the target \
entity {:?} ({:?}); no animations will play this frame",
player_id,
entity_mut.id(),
entity_mut.get::<Name>(),
);
return;
};
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
// The graph might not have loaded yet. Safely bail.
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let Some(animation_graph) = graphs.get(animation_graph_id) else {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
return;
};
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
// Determine which mask groups this animation target belongs to.
let target_mask = animation_graph
.mask_groups
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
.get(&target_id)
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
.cloned()
.unwrap_or_default();
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
// Apply the animations one after another. The way we accumulate
// weights ensures that the order we apply them in doesn't matter.
//
// Proof: Consider three animations A₀, A₁, A₂, … with weights w₀,
// w₁, w₂, … respectively. We seek the value:
//
// A₀w₀ + A₁w₁ + A₂w₂ + ⋯
//
// Defining lerp(a, b, t) = a + t(b - a), we have:
//
// ⎛ ⎛ w₁ ⎞ w₂ ⎞
// A₀w₀ + A₁w₁ + A₂w₂ + ⋯ = ⋯ lerp⎜lerp⎜A₀, A₁, ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎟, A₂, ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎟ ⋯
// ⎝ ⎝ w₀ + w₁⎠ w₀ + w₁ + w₂⎠
//
// Each step of the following loop corresponds to one of the lerp
// operations above.
let mut total_weight = 0.0;
for (&animation_graph_node_index, active_animation) in
animation_player.active_animations.iter()
{
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
// If the weight is zero or the current animation target is
// masked out, stop here.
if active_animation.weight == 0.0
|| (target_mask & active_animation.computed_mask) != 0
{
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
continue;
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
let Some(clip) = animation_graph
.get(animation_graph_node_index)
.and_then(|animation_graph_node| animation_graph_node.clip.as_ref())
.and_then(|animation_clip_handle| clips.get(animation_clip_handle))
else {
continue;
};
Add morph targets (#8158) # Objective - Add morph targets to `bevy_pbr` (closes #5756) & load them from glTF - Supersedes #3722 - Fixes #6814 [Morph targets][1] (also known as shape interpolation, shape keys, or blend shapes) allow animating individual vertices with fine grained controls. This is typically used for facial expressions. By specifying multiple poses as vertex offset, and providing a set of weight of each pose, it is possible to define surprisingly realistic transitions between poses. Blending between multiple poses also allow composition. Morph targets are part of the [gltf standard][2] and are a feature of Unity and Unreal, and babylone.js, it is only natural to implement them in bevy. ## Solution This implementation of morph targets uses a 3d texture where each pixel is a component of an animated attribute. Each layer is a different target. We use a 2d texture for each target, because the number of attribute×components×animated vertices is expected to always exceed the maximum pixel row size limit of webGL2. It copies fairly closely the way skinning is implemented on the CPU side, while on the GPU side, the shader morph target implementation is a relatively trivial detail. We add an optional `morph_texture` to the `Mesh` struct. The `morph_texture` is built through a method that accepts an iterator over attribute buffers. The `MorphWeights` component, user-accessible, controls the blend of poses used by mesh instances (so that multiple copy of the same mesh may have different weights), all the weights are uploaded to a uniform buffer of 256 `f32`. We limit to 16 poses per mesh, and a total of 256 poses. More literature: * Old babylone.js implementation (vertex attribute-based): https://www.eternalcoding.com/dev-log-1-morph-targets/ * Babylone.js implementation (similar to ours): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBPRmGgU0PE * GPU gems 3: https://developer.nvidia.com/gpugems/gpugems3/part-i-geometry/chapter-3-directx-10-blend-shapes-breaking-limits * Development discord thread https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1083325980615114772 https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26321040/231181046-3bca2ab2-d4d9-472e-8098-639f1871ce2e.mp4 https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/assets/26321040/d2a0c544-0ef8-45cf-9f99-8c3792f5a258 ## Acknowledgements * Thanks to `storytold` for sponsoring the feature * Thanks to `superdump` and `james7132` for guidance and help figuring out stuff ## Future work - Handling of less and more attributes (eg: animated uv, animated arbitrary attributes) - Dynamic pose allocation (so that zero-weighted poses aren't uploaded to GPU for example, enables much more total poses) - Better animation API, see #8357 ---- ## Changelog - Add morph targets to bevy meshes - Support up to 64 poses per mesh of individually up to 116508 vertices, animation currently strictly limited to the position, normal and tangent attributes. - Load a morph target using `Mesh::set_morph_targets` - Add `VisitMorphTargets` and `VisitMorphAttributes` traits to `bevy_render`, this allows defining morph targets (a fairly complex and nested data structure) through iterators (ie: single copy instead of passing around buffers), see documentation of those traits for details - Add `MorphWeights` component exported by `bevy_render` - `MorphWeights` control mesh's morph target weights, blending between various poses defined as morph targets. - `MorphWeights` are directly inherited by direct children (single level of hierarchy) of an entity. This allows controlling several mesh primitives through a unique entity _as per GLTF spec_. - Add `MorphTargetNames` component, naming each indices of loaded morph targets. - Load morph targets weights and buffers in `bevy_gltf` - handle morph targets animations in `bevy_animation` (previously, it was a `warn!` log) - Add the `MorphStressTest.gltf` asset for morph targets testing, taken from the glTF samples repo, CC0. - Add morph target manipulation to `scene_viewer` - Separate the animation code in `scene_viewer` from the rest of the code, reducing `#[cfg(feature)]` noise - Add the `morph_targets.rs` example to show off how to manipulate morph targets, loading `MorpStressTest.gltf` ## Migration Guide - (very specialized, unlikely to be touched by 3rd parties) - `MeshPipeline` now has a single `mesh_layouts` field rather than separate `mesh_layout` and `skinned_mesh_layout` fields. You should handle all possible mesh bind group layouts in your implementation - You should also handle properly the new `MORPH_TARGETS` shader def and mesh pipeline key. A new function is exposed to make this easier: `setup_moprh_and_skinning_defs` - The `MeshBindGroup` is now `MeshBindGroups`, cached bind groups are now accessed through the `get` method. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morph_target_animation [2]: https://registry.khronos.org/glTF/specs/2.0/glTF-2.0.html#morph-targets --------- Co-authored-by: François <mockersf@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-22 20:00:01 +00:00
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let Some(curves) = clip.curves_for_target(target_id) else {
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
continue;
};
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
let weight = active_animation.computed_weight;
total_weight += weight;
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let weight = weight / total_weight;
let seek_time = active_animation.seek_time;
for curve in curves {
// Some curves have only one keyframe used to set a transform
if curve.keyframe_timestamps.len() == 1 {
if let Err(err) = curve.keyframes.apply_single_keyframe(
transform.as_mut().map(|transform| transform.reborrow()),
entity_mut.reborrow(),
weight,
) {
warn!("Animation application failed: {:?}", err);
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
continue;
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
// Find the best keyframe to interpolate from
let step_start = curve.find_interpolation_start_keyframe(seek_time);
let timestamp_start = curve.keyframe_timestamps[step_start];
let timestamp_end = curve.keyframe_timestamps[step_start + 1];
// Compute how far we are through the keyframe, normalized to [0, 1]
let lerp = f32::inverse_lerp(timestamp_start, timestamp_end, seek_time)
.clamp(0.0, 1.0);
if let Err(err) = curve.keyframes.apply_tweened_keyframes(
transform.as_mut().map(|transform| transform.reborrow()),
entity_mut.reborrow(),
curve.interpolation,
step_start,
lerp,
weight,
timestamp_end - timestamp_start,
) {
warn!("Animation application failed: {:?}", err);
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
}
}
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
});
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
}
/// Adds animation support to an app
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct AnimationPlugin;
impl Plugin for AnimationPlugin {
fn build(&self, app: &mut App) {
app.init_asset::<AnimationClip>()
.init_asset::<AnimationGraph>()
.init_asset_loader::<AnimationGraphAssetLoader>()
.register_asset_reflect::<AnimationClip>()
.register_asset_reflect::<AnimationGraph>()
.register_type::<AnimationPlayer>()
.register_type::<AnimationTarget>()
.register_type::<AnimationTransitions>()
.register_type::<NodeIndex>()
.add_systems(
PostUpdate,
(
advance_transitions,
advance_animations,
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
// TODO: `animate_targets` can animate anything, so
// ambiguity testing currently considers it ambiguous with
// every other system in `PostUpdate`. We may want to move
// it to its own system set after `Update` but before
// `PostUpdate`. For now, we just disable ambiguity testing
// for this system.
animate_targets
.after(bevy_render::mesh::morph::inherit_weights)
.ambiguous_with_all(),
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
expire_completed_transitions,
)
.chain()
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
.before(TransformSystem::TransformPropagate)
.before(UiSystem::Prepare),
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
);
}
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
impl AnimationTargetId {
/// Creates a new [`AnimationTargetId`] by hashing a list of names.
///
/// Typically, this will be the path from the animation root to the
/// animation target (e.g. bone) that is to be animated.
pub fn from_names<'a>(names: impl Iterator<Item = &'a Name>) -> Self {
let mut blake3 = blake3::Hasher::new();
blake3.update(ANIMATION_TARGET_NAMESPACE.as_bytes());
for name in names {
blake3.update(name.as_bytes());
}
let hash = blake3.finalize().as_bytes()[0..16].try_into().unwrap();
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
Self(*uuid::Builder::from_sha1_bytes(hash).as_uuid())
}
/// Creates a new [`AnimationTargetId`] by hashing a single name.
pub fn from_name(name: &Name) -> Self {
Self::from_names(iter::once(name))
}
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
impl From<&Name> for AnimationTargetId {
fn from(name: &Name) -> Self {
AnimationTargetId::from_name(name)
}
}
Rework animation to be done in two phases. (#11707) # Objective Bevy's animation system currently does tree traversals based on `Name` that aren't necessary. Not only do they require in unsafe code because tree traversals are awkward with parallelism, but they are also somewhat slow, brittle, and complex, which manifested itself as way too many queries in #11670. # Solution Divide animation into two phases: animation *advancement* and animation *evaluation*, which run after one another. *Advancement* operates on the `AnimationPlayer` and sets the current animation time to match the game time. *Evaluation* operates on all animation bones in the scene in parallel and sets the transforms and/or morph weights based on the time and the clip. To do this, we introduce a new component, `AnimationTarget`, which the asset loader places on every bone. It contains the ID of the entity containing the `AnimationPlayer`, as well as a UUID that identifies which bone in the animation the target corresponds to. In the case of glTF, the UUID is derived from the full path name to the bone. The rule that `AnimationTarget`s are descendants of the entity containing `AnimationPlayer` is now just a convention, not a requirement; this allows us to eliminate the unsafe code. # Migration guide * `AnimationClip` now uses UUIDs instead of hierarchical paths based on the `Name` component to refer to bones. This has several consequences: - A new component, `AnimationTarget`, should be placed on each bone that you wish to animate, in order to specify its UUID and the associated `AnimationPlayer`. The glTF loader automatically creates these components as necessary, so most uses of glTF rigs shouldn't need to change. - Moving a bone around the tree, or renaming it, no longer prevents an `AnimationPlayer` from affecting it. - Dynamically changing the `AnimationPlayer` component will likely require manual updating of the `AnimationTarget` components. * Entities with `AnimationPlayer` components may now possess descendants that also have `AnimationPlayer` components. They may not, however, animate the same bones. * As they aren't specific to `TypeId`s, `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpTypeIdHasher` have been renamed to `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHash` and `bevy_reflect::utility::NoOpHasher` respectively.
2024-02-19 14:59:54 +00:00
impl MapEntities for AnimationTarget {
fn map_entities<M: EntityMapper>(&mut self, entity_mapper: &mut M) {
self.player = entity_mapper.map_entity(self.player);
}
}
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
impl AnimationGraphEvaluator {
// Starts a new depth-first search.
fn reset(&mut self, root: AnimationNodeIndex, node_count: usize) {
self.dfs_stack.clear();
self.dfs_stack.push(root);
self.dfs_visited.grow(node_count);
self.dfs_visited.clear();
Implement animation masks, allowing fine control of the targets that animations affect. (#15013) This commit adds support for *masks* to the animation graph. A mask is a set of animation targets (bones) that neither a node nor its descendants are allowed to animate. Animation targets can be assigned one or more *mask group*s, which are specific to a single graph. If a node masks out any mask group that an animation target belongs to, animation curves for that target will be ignored during evaluation. The canonical use case for masks is to support characters holding objects. Typically, character animations will contain hand animations in the case that the character's hand is empty. (For example, running animations may close a character's fingers into a fist.) However, when the character is holding an object, the animation must be altered so that the hand grips the object. Bevy currently has no convenient way to handle this. The only workaround that I can see is to have entirely separate animation clips for characters' hands and bodies and keep them in sync, which is burdensome and doesn't match artists' expectations from other engines, which all effectively have support for masks. However, with mask group support, this task is simple. We assign each hand to a mask group and parent all character animations to a node. When a character grasps an object in hand, we position the fingers as appropriate and then enable the mask group for that hand in that node. This allows the character's animations to run normally, while the object remains correctly attached to the hand. Note that even with this PR, we won't have support for running separate animations for a character's hand and the rest of the character. This is because we're missing additive blending: there's no way to combine the two masked animations together properly. I intend that to be a follow-up PR. The major engines all have support for masks, though the workflow varies from engine to engine: * Unity has support for masks [essentially as implemented here], though with layers instead of a tree. However, when using the Mecanim ("Humanoid") feature, precise control over bones is lost in favor of predefined muscle groups. * Unreal has a feature named [*layered blend per bone*]. This allows for separate blend weights for different bones, effectively achieving masks. I believe that the combination of blend nodes and masks make Bevy's animation graph as expressible as that of Unreal, once we have support for additive blending, though you may have to use more nodes than you would in Unreal. Moreover, separating out the concepts of "blend weight" and "which bones this node applies to" seems like a cleaner design than what Unreal has. * Godot's `AnimationTree` has the notion of [*blend filters*], which are essentially the same as masks as implemented in this PR. Additionally, this patch fixes a bug with weight evaluation whereby weights weren't properly propagated down to grandchildren, because the weight evaluation for a node only checked its parent's weight, not its evaluated weight. I considered submitting this as a separate PR, but given that this PR refactors that code entirely to support masks and weights under a unified "evaluated node" concept, I simply included the fix here. A new example, `animation_masks`, has been added. It demonstrates how to toggle masks on and off for specific portions of a skin. This is part of #14395, but I'm going to defer closing that issue until we have additive blending. [essentially as implemented here]: https://docs.unity3d.com/560/Documentation/Manual/class-AvatarMask.html [*layered blend per bone*]: https://dev.epicgames.com/documentation/en-us/unreal-engine/using-layered-animations-in-unreal-engine [*blend filters*]: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/animation/animation_tree.html ## Migration Guide * The serialized format of animation graphs has changed with the addition of animation masks. To upgrade animation graph RON files, add `mask` and `mask_groups` fields as appropriate. (They can be safely set to zero.)
2024-09-02 17:10:34 +00:00
self.nodes.clear();
self.nodes
.extend(iter::repeat(EvaluatedAnimationGraphNode::default()).take(node_count));
Implement the `AnimationGraph`, allowing for multiple animations to be blended together. (#11989) This is an implementation of RFC #51: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined in that RFC, because two-phase animation has now landed. # Objective Bevy needs animation blending. The RFC for this is [RFC 51]. ## Solution This is an implementation of the RFC. Note that the implementation strategy is different from the one outlined there, because two-phase animation has now landed. This is just a draft to get the conversation started. Currently we're missing a few things: - [x] A fully-fleshed-out mechanism for transitions - [x] A serialization format for `AnimationGraph`s - [x] Examples are broken, other than `animated_fox` - [x] Documentation --- ## Changelog ### Added * The `AnimationPlayer` has been reworked to support blending multiple animations together through an `AnimationGraph`, and as such will no longer function unless a `Handle<AnimationGraph>` has been added to the entity containing the player. See [RFC 51] for more details. * Transition functionality has moved from the `AnimationPlayer` to a new component, `AnimationTransitions`, which works in tandem with the `AnimationGraph`. ## Migration Guide * `AnimationPlayer`s can no longer play animations by themselves and need to be paired with a `Handle<AnimationGraph>`. Code that was using `AnimationPlayer` to play animations will need to create an `AnimationGraph` asset first, add a node for the clip (or clips) you want to play, and then supply the index of that node to the `AnimationPlayer`'s `play` method. * The `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()` method has been removed and replaced with the `AnimationTransitions` component. If you were previously using `AnimationPlayer::play_with_transition()`, add all animations that you were playing to the `AnimationGraph`, and create an `AnimationTransitions` component to manage the blending between them. [RFC 51]: https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/51-animation-composition.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
2024-03-07 20:22:42 +00:00
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
use crate::{prelude::TranslationKeyframes, VariableCurve};
use bevy_math::Vec3;
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
// Returns the curve and the keyframe count.
fn test_variable_curve() -> (VariableCurve, usize) {
let keyframe_timestamps = vec![1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0];
let keyframes = vec![
Vec3::ONE * 0.0,
Vec3::ONE * 3.0,
Vec3::ONE * 6.0,
Vec3::ONE * 9.0,
];
let interpolation = crate::Interpolation::Linear;
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
assert_eq!(keyframe_timestamps.len(), keyframes.len());
let keyframe_count = keyframes.len();
let variable_curve = VariableCurve::new::<TranslationKeyframes>(
keyframe_timestamps,
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
keyframes,
interpolation,
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
);
// f32 doesn't impl Ord so we can't easily sort it
let mut maybe_last_timestamp = None;
for current_timestamp in &variable_curve.keyframe_timestamps {
assert!(current_timestamp.is_finite());
if let Some(last_timestamp) = maybe_last_timestamp {
assert!(current_timestamp > last_timestamp);
}
maybe_last_timestamp = Some(current_timestamp);
}
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
(variable_curve, keyframe_count)
}
#[test]
fn find_current_keyframe_is_in_bounds() {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let curve = test_variable_curve().0;
let min_time = *curve.keyframe_timestamps.first().unwrap();
// We will always get none at times at or past the second last keyframe
let second_last_keyframe = curve.keyframe_timestamps.len() - 2;
let max_time = curve.keyframe_timestamps[second_last_keyframe];
let elapsed_time = max_time - min_time;
let n_keyframes = curve.keyframe_timestamps.len();
let n_test_points = 5;
for i in 0..=n_test_points {
// Get a value between 0 and 1
let normalized_time = i as f32 / n_test_points as f32;
let seek_time = min_time + normalized_time * elapsed_time;
assert!(seek_time >= min_time);
assert!(seek_time <= max_time);
let maybe_current_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(seek_time);
assert!(
maybe_current_keyframe.is_some(),
"Seek time: {seek_time}, Min time: {min_time}, Max time: {max_time}"
);
// We cannot return the last keyframe,
// because we want to interpolate between the current and next keyframe
assert!(maybe_current_keyframe.unwrap() < n_keyframes);
}
}
#[test]
fn find_current_keyframe_returns_none_on_unstarted_animations() {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let curve = test_variable_curve().0;
let min_time = *curve.keyframe_timestamps.first().unwrap();
let seek_time = 0.0;
assert!(seek_time < min_time);
let maybe_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(seek_time);
assert!(
maybe_keyframe.is_none(),
"Seek time: {seek_time}, Minimum time: {min_time}"
);
}
#[test]
fn find_current_keyframe_returns_none_on_finished_animation() {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let curve = test_variable_curve().0;
let max_time = *curve.keyframe_timestamps.last().unwrap();
assert!(max_time < f32::INFINITY);
let maybe_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(f32::INFINITY);
assert!(maybe_keyframe.is_none());
let maybe_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(max_time);
assert!(maybe_keyframe.is_none());
}
#[test]
fn second_last_keyframe_is_found_correctly() {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let curve = test_variable_curve().0;
// Exact time match
let second_last_keyframe = curve.keyframe_timestamps.len() - 2;
let second_last_time = curve.keyframe_timestamps[second_last_keyframe];
let maybe_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(second_last_time);
assert!(maybe_keyframe.unwrap() == second_last_keyframe);
// Inexact match, between the last and second last frames
let seek_time = second_last_time + 0.001;
let last_time = curve.keyframe_timestamps[second_last_keyframe + 1];
assert!(seek_time < last_time);
let maybe_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(seek_time);
assert!(maybe_keyframe.unwrap() == second_last_keyframe);
}
#[test]
fn exact_keyframe_matches_are_found_correctly() {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let (curve, keyframe_count) = test_variable_curve();
let second_last_keyframe = keyframe_count - 2;
for i in 0..=second_last_keyframe {
let seek_time = curve.keyframe_timestamps[i];
let keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(seek_time).unwrap();
assert!(keyframe == i);
}
}
#[test]
fn exact_and_inexact_keyframes_correspond() {
Allow animation clips to animate arbitrary properties. (#15282) Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating `Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or `MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI, as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be animated instead. This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait, `AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you can migrate by simply changing your code from `Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights. An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a text section follows: #[derive(Reflect)] struct FontSizeProperty; impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty { type Component = Text; type Property = f32; fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut Self::Property> { Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size) } } In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection system. That can be a follow-up. This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that benchmark and have found no significant regressions. A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and color, which wasn't possible before this patch. ## Showcase https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97 ## Migration Guide * Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace `Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`, `Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with `Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and `Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
2024-09-23 17:14:12 +00:00
let (curve, keyframe_count) = test_variable_curve();
let second_last_keyframe = keyframe_count - 2;
for i in 0..=second_last_keyframe {
let seek_time = curve.keyframe_timestamps[i];
let exact_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(seek_time).unwrap();
let inexact_seek_time = seek_time + 0.0001;
let final_time = *curve.keyframe_timestamps.last().unwrap();
assert!(inexact_seek_time < final_time);
let inexact_keyframe = curve.find_current_keyframe(inexact_seek_time).unwrap();
assert!(exact_keyframe == inexact_keyframe);
}
}
}