Early MMU improves performance especially on emulators. However, the
early MMU is left enabled after the first stage of SPL boot. Instead
of flushing D-cache and dealing with re-enabling MMU for the second
stage U-Boot, disabling it for SPL build simplifies the process. The
performance penalty is unnoticeable on the real hardware. As of now,
SPL boot is not supported by existing emulators. So this should have
no impact on emulators.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
As per the top level U-Boot README "Board Initialisation Flow"
section, board_init_f() should return without calling board_init_r()
directly. Clearing BSS and calling board_init_r() will be done in
crt0_64.S.
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Move forward the basic non-secure access enable operation, so the
subsequent individual device access permission can override it.
And collect the dispersed callers in board level, and then move
them to SoC level.
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
The SPL code already knows which boot device it calls the spl_boot_mode()
on, so pass that information into the function. This allows the code of
spl_boot_mode() avoid invoking spl_boot_device() again, but it also lets
board_boot_order() correctly alter the behavior of the boot process.
The later one is important, since in certain cases, it is desired that
spl_boot_device() return value be overriden using board_boot_order().
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas@biessmann.org>
[add newly introduced zynq variant]
Signed-aff-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas@biessmann.org>
MMCSD_MODE_FAT has be renmaed to MMCSD_MODE_FS by commit 205b4f33.
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
init_early_memctl_regs() is also be called in board_early_init_f().
So remove the duplicated call in spl code.
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
LS2080A is the primary SoC, and LS2085A is a personality with AIOP
and DPAA DDR. The RDB and QDS boards support both personality. By
detecting the SVR at runtime, a single image per board can support
both SoCs. It gives users flexibility to swtich SoC without the need
to reprogram the board.
Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
CC: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
The global_data pointer (gd) has been set earlier in crt0_64.S.
So there's no need to assign it again. Remove gdata since it is going
away in U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Freescale's LS2085A is a another personality of LS2080A SoC with
support of AIOP and DP-DDR.
This Patch adds support of LS2085A Personality.
Signed-off-by: Pratiyush Mohan Srivastava <pratiyush.srivastava@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
[York Sun: Updated MAINTAINERS files
Dropped #ifdef in cpu.h
Add CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y in defconfig]
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
LS2080A is a prime personality of Freescale’s LS2085A. It is a non-AIOP
personality without support of DP-DDR, L2 switch, 1588, PCIe endpoint etc.
So renaming existing LS2085A code base to reflect LS2080A (Prime personality)
Signed-off-by: Pratiyush Mohan Srivastava <pratiyush.srivastava@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
[York Sun: Dropped #ifdef in cpu.c for cpu_type_list]
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
There are two LS series processors are built on ARMv8 Layersacpe
architecture currently, LS2085A and LS1043A. They are based on
ARMv8 core although use different chassis, so create fsl-layerscape
to refactor the common code for the LS series processors which also
paves the way for adding LS1043A platform.
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
