We have flipped CONFIG_SPL_DISABLE_OF_CONTROL. We have cleansing
devices, $(SPL_) and CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(), so we are ready to clear
away the ugly logic in include/fdtdec.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL
# if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(SPL_OF_CONTROL)
# define OF_CONTROL 0
# else
# define OF_CONTROL 1
# endif
#else
# define OF_CONTROL 0
#endif
Now CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL) is the substitute. It refers to
CONFIG_OF_CONTROL for U-boot proper and CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL for
SPL.
Also, we no longer have to cancel CONFIG_OF_CONTROL in
include/config_uncmd_spl.h and scripts/Makefile.spl.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The logic for simple PLLs on T124 was broken by this commit:
722e000c Tegra: PLL: use per-SoC pllinfo table instead of PLL_DIVM/N/P, etc.
Correct it by reading from the same pll_misc register that it writes to and
adding an entry for the DP PLL in the pllinfo table.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Added PLL variables (dividers mask/shift, lock enable/detect, etc.)
to new pllinfo struct for each Soc/PLL. PLLA/C/D/E/M/P/U/X.
Used pllinfo struct in all clock functions, validated on T210.
Should be equivalent to prior code on T124/114/30/20. Thanks
to Marcel Ziswiler for corrections to the T20/T30 values.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Added 38.4MHz/48MHz entries to pll_x_table for CPU PLL. Needs
to be measured - should be close to 700MHz (1.4G/2).
Note that some freqs aren't in the PLLU table in T210 TRM
(13, 26MHz), so I used the 12MHz table entry for them. They
shouldn't be selected since they're not viable T210 OSC freqs.
Since there are now 2 new OSC defines, all tables (pll_x_table,
PLLU) had to increase by two entries, but since 38.4/48MHz are
not viable osc freqs on T20/30/114, etc, they're just set to 0.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Derived from Tegra124, modified as appropriate during T210
board bringup. Cleaned up debug statements to conserve
string space, too. This also adds misc 64-bit changes
from Thierry Reding/Stephen Warren.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
A subsequent patch will enable the use of the architected timer on
ARMv8. Doing so implies that udelay() will be backed by this timer
implementation, and hence the architected timer must be ready when
udelay() is first called. The first time udelay() is used is while
resetting the debug UART, which happens very early. Make sure that
arch_timer_init() is called before that.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
A harmless but confusing warning is displayed when looking up the
DisplayPort PLL. Correct this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Add functions to provide access to the display clocks on Tegra124 including
setting the clock rate for an EDP display.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Create a function which sets the source clock for a peripheral, given
the number of mux bits to adjust. This can then be used more generally.
For now, don't export it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
The get_pll() function can do the wrong thing if passed values that are
out of range. Add checks for this and add a function which can return
a 'simple' PLL. This can be defined by SoCs with their own clocks.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
When the CPU is in non-secure (NS) mode (when running U-Boot under a
secure monitor), certain actions cannot be taken, since they would need
to write to secure-only registers. One example is configuring the ARM
architectural timer's CNTFRQ register.
We could support this in one of two ways:
1) Compile twice, once for secure mode (in which case anything goes) and
once for non-secure mode (in which case certain actions are disabled).
This complicates things, since everyone needs to keep track of
different U-Boot binaries for different situations.
2) Detect NS mode at run-time, and optionally skip any impossible actions.
This has the advantage of a single U-Boot binary working in all cases.
(2) is not possible on ARM in general, since there's no architectural way
to detect secure-vs-non-secure. However, there is a Tegra-specific way to
detect this.
This patches uses that feature to detect secure vs. NS mode on Tegra, and
uses that to:
* Skip the ARM arch timer initialization.
* Set/clear an environment variable so that boot scripts can take
different action depending on which mode the CPU is in. This might be
something like:
if CPU is secure:
load secure monitor code into RAM.
boot secure monitor.
secure monitor will restart (a new copy of) U-Boot in NS mode.
else:
execute normal boot process
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
