The way that we use this file currently means that we have to guard it
in every platform Kconfig. But it is also required in all NXP
platforms, including non-reference platforms. Make all options in it
have appropriate dependencies so that we can include it a single time
under arch/Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This is supposed to be a build-system flag. Move it there so we can
define it before linux/kconfig.h is included.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
- Provide a default Kconfig value of the default script
- Largely continue to define this via the board Kconfig file
- For the boards that select a script based on defconfig rather than
TARGET, keep this within the defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Historically, the reset_cpu() function had an `addr` parameter which was
meant to pass in an address of the reset vector location, where the CPU
should reset to. This feature is no longer used anywhere in U-Boot as
all reset_cpu() implementations now ignore the passed value. Generic
code has been added which always calls reset_cpu() with `0` which means
this feature can no longer be used easily anyway.
Over time, many implementations seem to have "misunderstood" the
existence of this parameter as a way to customize/parameterize the reset
(e.g. COLD vs WARM resets). As this is not properly supported, the
code will almost always not do what it is intended to (because all
call-sites just call reset_cpu() with 0).
To avoid confusion and to clean up the codebase from unused left-overs
of the past, remove the `addr` parameter entirely. Code which intends
to support different kinds of resets should be rewritten as a sysreset
driver instead.
This transformation was done with the following coccinelle patch:
@@
expression argvalue;
@@
- reset_cpu(argvalue)
+ reset_cpu()
@@
identifier argname;
type argtype;
@@
- reset_cpu(argtype argname)
+ reset_cpu(void)
{ ... }
Signed-off-by: Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
add the dts file to the MAINTAINERS entry
Signed-off-by: Oliver Graute <oliver.graute@kococonnector.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Cc: uboot-imx <uboot-imx@nxp.com>
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
We should not use typedefs in U-Boot. They cannot be used as forward
declarations which means that header files must include the full header to
access them.
Drop the typedef and rename the struct to remove the _s suffix which is
now not useful.
This requires quite a few header-file additions.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
detail_board_ddr_info() is not used anywhere, so simply remove it.
This function is only used by Layerscape, not by i.MX.
This was detected by the following sparse warning:
board/advantech/imx8qm_rom7720_a1/imx8qm_rom7720_a1.c:110:6: warning: no previous
prototype for ‘detail_board_ddr_info’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: Alifer Moraes <alifer.wsdm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Graute <oliver.graute@kococonnector.com>
