As part of migrating to DM_GPIO and DM_PINCTRL, eventually we will
remove the asm/arch/gpio.h header. In preparation, clean up the various
files that include it.
Some files did not contain any GPIO code at all, so this header was
completely unused.
A few files contained only legacy platform-specific GPIO code for
setting up pin muxes. They were left unchanged, as that code will be
completely removed by the DM_PINCTRL migration.
The remaining files contain some combination of DM_GPIO and legacy GPIO
code. For those, switch to including asm/gpio.h (if it wasn't included
already). Right now, this header provides both sets of functions,
because ARCH_SUNXI selects GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER. This will still be the
right header to include once the DM_GPIO migration is complete and
GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The current macro is a misnomer since it does not declare a device
directly. Instead, it declares driver_info record which U-Boot uses at
runtime to create a device.
The distinction seems somewhat minor most of the time, but is becomes
quite confusing when we actually want to declare a device, with
of-platdata. We are left trying to distinguish between a device which
isn't actually device, and a device that is (perhaps an 'instance'?)
It seems better to rename this macro to describe what it actually is. The
macros is not widely used, since boards should use devicetree to declare
devices.
Rename it to U_BOOT_DRVINFO(), which indicates clearly that this is
declaring a new driver_info record, not a device.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This construct is quite long-winded. In earlier days it made some sense
since auto-allocation was a strange concept. But with driver model now
used pretty universally, we can shorten this to 'auto'. This reduces
verbosity and makes it easier to read.
Coincidentally it also ensures that every declaration is on one line,
thus making dtoc's job easier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Extend DE2 driver with LCD support. Tested on Pinebook which is based
on A64 and has ANX6345 eDP bridge with eDP panel connected to it.
Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
[agust: rebased v5 on u-boot-video/master]
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>