The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS_NAND
namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely
should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG
namespace and in to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Enable CONFIG_DM_ETH in configs/pm9263_defconfig
Drop legacy initialization in board/ronetix/pm9263.c
Remove network related setting from include/configs/pm9263.h
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <iliev@ronetix.at>
Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Update the configuration files to support the device tree and driver
model. The peripheral clock and pins configuration are handled by
the clock and the pinctrl drivers respectively.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
As part of preparation for nand DM conversion the new API has been
introduced to remove direct access to nand_info array. So, use it here
instead of accessing to nand_info array directly.
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Rather than relying on common.h to provide this include, which is going
away at some point, include it explicitly in each file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
By making dram_init_banksize() return an error code we can drop the
wrapper. Adjust this and clean up all implementations.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
nand_info[] is now an array of pointers, with the actual mtd_info
instance embedded in struct nand_chip.
This is in preparation for syncing the NAND code with Linux 4.6,
which makes the same change to struct nand_chip. It's in a separate
commit due to the large amount of changes required to accommodate the
change to nand_info[].
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Due to introducing the new peripheral clock handle functions,
use these functions to reduce duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
[Rebased on current master, fixup for at91rm9200ek]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Copied from Linux sources "include/linux/sizes.h" commit
413541dd66d51f791a0b169d9b9014e4f56be13c
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Acked-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
[trini: Add bcm Kona platforms to the patch]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Change my old email address which is no longer valid.
Signed-off-by: Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Fix:
pm9263.c: In function 'pm9263_lcd_hw_psram_init':
pm9263.c:167:20: warning: variable 'x' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Checkpatch.pl complains about the volatile qualifier in calls to
get_ram_size(). Remove this qualifier in the prototype and in the
calls where it is useless, and leave it only in the function body
where it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Fix warning:
pm9263.c: In function 'pm9263_macb_hw_init':
pm9263.c:99: warning: unused variable 'pio'
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Ilko Iliev <iliev@ronetix.at>
Configuration defines should be preceeded with CONFIG_SYS_. Renamed
some at91 specific defines to conform to this naming convention:
AT91_CPU_NAME to CONFIG_SYS_AT91_CPU_NAME
AT91_MAIN_CLOCK to CONFIG_SYS_AT91_MAIN_CLOCK
Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich <aehrlich@taskit.de>
move PSRAM init to pm9263.c
this will allow us after to make the nor lowlevel_init generic
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
The PM9263 board is based on the AT91SAM9263-EK board.
Here is the page on Ronetix website:
http://www.ronetix.at/starter_kit_9263.html
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <iliev@ronetix.at>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
