Move imx8 sci header file to include/firmware/imx, then we could
use build macro to reuse some i.MX8 drivers for i.MX9, such as
drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
This function is empty, drop it.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Cc: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Cc: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Steven Lawrance <steven.lawrance@softathome.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Historically, the reset_cpu() function had an `addr` parameter which was
meant to pass in an address of the reset vector location, where the CPU
should reset to. This feature is no longer used anywhere in U-Boot as
all reset_cpu() implementations now ignore the passed value. Generic
code has been added which always calls reset_cpu() with `0` which means
this feature can no longer be used easily anyway.
Over time, many implementations seem to have "misunderstood" the
existence of this parameter as a way to customize/parameterize the reset
(e.g. COLD vs WARM resets). As this is not properly supported, the
code will almost always not do what it is intended to (because all
call-sites just call reset_cpu() with 0).
To avoid confusion and to clean up the codebase from unused left-overs
of the past, remove the `addr` parameter entirely. Code which intends
to support different kinds of resets should be rewritten as a sysreset
driver instead.
This transformation was done with the following coccinelle patch:
@@
expression argvalue;
@@
- reset_cpu(argvalue)
+ reset_cpu()
@@
identifier argname;
type argtype;
@@
- reset_cpu(argtype argname)
+ reset_cpu(void)
{ ... }
Signed-off-by: Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
We should not use typedefs in U-Boot. They cannot be used as forward
declarations which means that header files must include the full header to
access them.
Drop the typedef and rename the struct to remove the _s suffix which is
now not useful.
This requires quite a few header-file additions.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
