In some communities, it may be necessary to append something after PATCH
in the subject line. For example, the Linux networking subsystem
expects [1] patch subject prefixes like [RFC PATCH net-next 0/99]. This
adds support for such "postfix"s to patman. Although entirely cosmetic,
it is still nice to have.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#how-do-i-indicate-which-tree-net-vs-net-next-my-patch-should-be-in
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This patch adds or modifies functional tests for the Cover-changes,
Commit-changes, and Series-process-log tags in order to account for new
behavior added in the previous few patches. The '(no changes since v1)'
case is not tested for, since that would need an additional commit to test
in addition to testing the existing code paths.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This patch renames the routine fdtdec_setup_memory_size()
to fdtdec_setup_mem_size_base() as it now fills the
mem base as well along with size.
Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <siva.durga.paladugu@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The existing test (patman --test) only covers basic checkpatch output.
We have had some problems with unicode processing and could use test
coverage for the various tags patman supports.
Add a new functional test which runs most of the patman flow on a few
test commits and checks that the results are correct.
See the documentation in the test for a description of what it does.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
