The Arm EBBR (Embedded Base Boot Requirements) require that the time
and basic networking EFI interfaces are available and working, so long
as the hardware has an RTC and network interface.
Arm FVPs typically have a memory-mapped PL031 RTC and a VIRTIO_NET
device defined in the device tree, so "imply" these in the Kconfig for
the FVP base model to simplify creating EBBR-compliant firmware.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hoyes <Peter.Hoyes@arm.com>
BASE_FVP now typically uses a devicetree provided by a prior boot stage
(typically Arm TF-A), so imply this option by default when
TARGET_VEXPRESS64_BASE_FVP is selected.
OF_HAS_PRIOR_STAGE selects OF_BOARD so this change is minor, but aligns
TARGET_VEXPRESS64_BASE_FVP with TARGET_VEXPRESS64_BASER_FVP.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hoyes <Peter.Hoyes@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
We only need to enable DM_ETH if we have a networking driver. All
networking drivers depend on DM_ETH being enabled, and their selection
ensures DM_ETH will be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The current name is inconsistent with SPL which uses CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
and this makes it imposible to use CONFIG_VAL().
Rename it to resolve this problem.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The ARMv8-R64 architecture introduces optional VMSA (paging based MMU)
support in the EL1/0 translation regime, which makes that part mostly
compatible to ARMv8-A.
Add a new board variant to describe the "BASE-R64" FVP model, which
inherits a lot from the existing v8-A FVP support. One major difference
is that the memory map in "inverted": DRAM starts at 0x0, MMIO is at
2GB [1].
* Create new TARGET_VEXPRESS64_BASER_FVP target, sharing most of the
exising configuration.
* Implement inverted memory map in vexpress_aemv8.h
* Create vexpress_aemv8r defconfig
* Provide an MMU memory map for the BASER_FVP
* Update vexpress64 documentation
At the moment the boot-wrapper is the only supported secure firmware. As
there is no official DT for the board yet, we rely on it being supplied
by the boot-wrapper into U-Boot, so use OF_HAS_PRIOR_STAGE, and go with
a dummy DT for now.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100964/1114/Base-Platform/Base---memory/BaseR-Platform-memory-map
Signed-off-by: Peter Hoyes <Peter.Hoyes@arm.com>
[Andre: rebase and add Linux kernel header]
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
[trini: Add MAINTAINERS entry for Peter]
The defconfigs for the Arm Juno board and the FVP model are quite large,
setting a lot of platform-fixed variables like SYS_TEXT_BASE.
As those values are not really a user choice, let's provide default
values for them in our Kconfig file, so a lot of cruft can be removed
from the defconfig files.
This also moves the driver selection out of there, since this is again
not something a user should really decide on. Instead we allow users to
enable or disable subsystems, and select the appropriate drivers based
on that in the Kconfig file.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
The FVP base model is relying on a DT for Linux operation, so there is
no reason we would need to rely on hardcoded information for U-Boot.
Letting U-Boot use a DT will open up the usage of actual peripherals,
beyond the support for semihosting only.
Enable OF_CONTROL in the Kconfig, and use the latest dts files from
Linux. Depending on whether we use the boot-wrapper or TF-A, there is
already a DTB provided or not, respectively.
To cover the boot-wrapper, we add an arm64 Linux kernel header, which
allows the boot-wrapper to treat U-Boot like a Linux kernel. U-Boot will
find the pointer to the DTB in x0, and will use it.
Even though TF-A carries a DT, at the moment this is not made available
to non-secure world, so to not break users, we use the U-Boot provided
DTB copy in that case. For some reason TF-A puts some DT like structure
at the address x0 is pointing at, but that is very small and doesn't
carry any hardware information. Make the code to ignore those small DTBs.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
At the moment we define three "VExpress64" boards in arch/arm/Kconfig,
plus have a second Kconfig file in board/armltd/Kconfig.
One of those three boards is actually bogus (TARGET_VEXPRESS64_AEMV8A),
that stanza looks like being forgotten in a previous cleanup.
To remove the clutter from the generic Kconfig file, just define some
ARCH_VEXPRESS64 symbol there, enable some common options, and do the
board/model specific configuration in the board/armltd Kconfig file.
That allows to streamline and fine tune the configuration later, and
to also pull a lot of "non user choices" out of the defconfigs.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Rename from vexpress_aemv8a.h -> vepxress_aemv8.h as new FVPs may not be
v8-A. No change in behavior.
This is towards future work to enable support for the FVP_BaseR.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hoyes <Peter.Hoyes@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
The Arm Juno board was still somewhat stuck in "hardcoded land", even
though there are stable DTs around, and one happens to actually be on
the memory mapped NOR flash.
Enable the configuration options to let the board use OF_CONTROL, and
add a routine to find the address of the DTB partition in NOR
flash, to use that for U-Boot's own purposes.
This can also passed on via $fdtcontroladdr to any kernel or EFI
application, removing the need to actually load a device tree.
Since the existing "afs" command and its flash routines require
flash_init() to be called before being usable, and this is done much
later in the boot process, we introduce a stripped-down partition finder
routine in vexpress64.c, to scan the NOR flash partitions for the
DT partition. This location is then used for U-Boot to find and probe
devices.
The name of the partition can be configured, if needed, but defaults
to "board.dtb", which is used by Linaro's firmware image provided.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This reverts commit fc04b92354 where the
FVP DRAM configuration was added.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Create an additional FVP configuration to boot images pre-loaded into
DRAM.
Sometimes it's preferential to boot the model by loading the files
directly into DRAM via model parameters, rather than using
SemiHosting.
An example of model parmaters that are used to pre-load the files
into DRAM:
--data cluster0.cpu0=Image@0x80080000 \
--data cluster0.cpu0=fvp-base-gicv2-psci.dtb@0x83000000 \
--data cluster0.cpu0=uInitrd@0x84000000
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
[trini: Update board/armltd/vexpress64/Kconfig logic]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
The FVP and Juno settings were identical, but duplicated, so I removed
the duplication with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
[trini: Adjust logic to keep if/endif in the file]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This variant that is neither FVP / Base Model or Juno Versatile
Express 64bit is confusing. Get rid of it unless someone can
point out what machine that really is. Seems to be an evolutional
artifact in the config base.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The Juno Development Platform is a physical Versatile Express
device with some differences from the emulated semihosting
models. The main difference is that the system is split in
a SoC and an FPGA where the SoC hosts the serial ports at
totally different adresses.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The Versatile Express ARMv8 semihosted FVP platform is still
using the legacy CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS method to configure
some compile-time flags. Get rid of this and create a Kconfig
entry for the FVP model, and a selectable bool for the
semihosting library.
The FVP subboard is now modeled as a target choice so we can
eventually choose between different ARMv8 versatile express
boards (FVP, base model, Juno...) this way. All dependent
symbols are updated to reflect this.
The 64bit Versatile Express board symbols are renamed
VEXPRESS64 so we have some chance to see what is actually
going on. Tested on the FVP fast model.
Acked-by: Steve Rae <srae@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
We do not have to distinguish CONFIG_TARGET_VEXPRESS_AEMV8A_SEMI
from CONFIG_TARGET_VEXPRESS_AEMV8A. Rename the former to the latter.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Rae <srae@broadcom.com>
Cc: David Feng <fenghua@phytium.com.cn>
Now the types of CONFIG_SYS_{ARCH, CPU, SOC, VENDOR, BOARD, CONFIG_NAME}
are specified in arch/Kconfig.
We can delete the ones in arch and board Kconfig files.
This commit can be easily reproduced by the following command:
find . -name Kconfig -a ! -path ./arch/Kconfig | xargs sed -i -e '
/config[[:space:]]SYS_\(ARCH\|CPU\|SOC\|\VENDOR\|BOARD\|CONFIG_NAME\)/ {
N
s/\n[[:space:]]*string//
}
'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
This commit adds:
- arch/${ARCH}/Kconfig
provide a menu to select target boards
- board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/Kconfig or board/${BOARD}/Kconfig
set CONFIG macros to the appropriate values for each board
- configs/${TARGET_BOARD}_defconfig
default setting of each board
(This commit was automatically generated by a conversion script
based on boards.cfg)
In Linux Kernel, defconfig files are located under
arch/${ARCH}/configs/ directory.
It works in Linux Kernel since ARCH is always given from the
command line for cross compile.
But in U-Boot, ARCH is not given from the command line.
Which means we cannot know ARCH until the board configuration is done.
That is why all the "*_defconfig" files should be gathered into a
single directory ./configs/.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
