Right now in multiple places there are only checks for the full
CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY option, not split into main,spl,tpl variants.
This breaks when the rsa functions get enabled for SPL, for example to
verify u-boot proper from spl.
So fix this by using the existing helpers to distinguis between
build-steps.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
While the SPL may want to do signature checking this won't be
the case for TPL in all cases, as TPL is mostly used when the
amount of initial memory is not enough for a full SPL.
So on a system where SPL uses DM but TPL does not we currently
end up with a TPL compile error of:
lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:48:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct checksum_algo’
To prevent that change the $(SPL_) to $(SPL_TPL_) to distinguish
between both. If someone really needs FIT signature checking in
TPL as well, a new TPL_RSA_VERIFY config symbol needs to be added.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
In the current implementation of FIT_SIGNATURE, five parameters for
a RSA public key are required while only two of them are essential.
(See rsa-mod-exp.h and uImage.FIT/signature.txt)
This is a result of considering relatively limited computer power
and resources on embedded systems, while such a assumption may not
be quite practical for other use cases.
In this patch, added is a function, rsa_gen_key_prop(), which will
generate additional parameters for other uses, in particular
UEFI secure boot, on the fly.
Note: the current code uses some "big number" routines from BearSSL
for the calculation.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Introduce new configuration, CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY which will decouple building
RSA functions from FIT verification and allow for adding a RSA-based
signature verification for other file formats, in particular PE file
for UEFI secure boot.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
This allows a board to configure verified boot within the SPL using
a FIT or FIT with external data. It also allows the SPL to perform
signature verification without needing relocation.
The board configuration will need to add the following feature defines:
CONFIG_SPL_CRYPTO_SUPPORT
CONFIG_SPL_HASH_SUPPORT
CONFIG_SPL_SHA256
In this example, SHA256 is the only selected hashing algorithm.
And the following booleans:
CONFIG_SPL=y
CONFIG_SPL_DM=y
CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT=y
CONFIG_SPL_FIT=y
CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT=y
CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE=y
Signed-off-by: Teddy Reed <teddy.reed@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com>
Remove dependency of rsa_mod_exp from CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE.
As rsa modular exponentiation is an independent module
and can be invoked independently.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana <gaurav.rana@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Public exponentiation which is required in rsa verify functionality is
tightly integrated with verification code in rsa_verify.c. The patch
splits the file into twp separating the modular exponentiation.
1. rsa-verify.c
- The file parses device tree keys node to fill a keyprop structure.
The keyprop structure can then be converted to implementation specific
format.
(struct rsa_pub_key for sw implementation)
- The parsed device tree node is then passed to a generic rsa_mod_exp
function.
2. rsa-mod-exp.c
Move the software specific functions related to modular exponentiation
from rsa-verify.c to this file.
Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com>
CC: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
based on patch from andreas@oetken.name:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/294318/
commit message:
I currently need support for rsa-sha256 signatures in u-boot and found out that
the code for signatures is not very generic. Thus adding of different
hash-algorithms for rsa-signatures is not easy to do without copy-pasting the
rsa-code. I attached a patch for how I think it could be better and included
support for rsa-sha256. This is a fast first shot.
aditionally work:
- removed checkpatch warnings
- removed compiler warnings
- rebased against current head
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: andreas@oetken.name
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
RSA provides a public key encryption facility which is ideal for image
signing and verification.
Images are signed using a private key by mkimage. Then at run-time, the
images are verified using a private key.
This implementation uses openssl for the host part (mkimage). To avoid
bringing large libraries into the U-Boot binary, the RSA public key
is encoded using a simple numeric representation in the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
