The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Converted to use fsl_esdhc_imx for i.MX platforms.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Jason Liu <Jason.hui.liu@nxp.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
By making dram_init_banksize() return an error code we can drop the
wrapper. Adjust this and clean up all implementations.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Now, arch/${ARCH}/include/asm/errno.h and include/linux/errno.h have
the same content. (both just wrap <asm-generic/errno.h>)
Replace all include directives for <asm/errno.h> with <linux/errno.h>.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
[trini: Fixup include/clk.]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When an invalid USDHC port is passed we should return -EINVAL instead of 0.
Also, return the error immediately on fsl_esdhc_initialize() failure.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
On mxc, each SDHC instance has a dedicated clock, so gd->sdhc_clk is not
suitable for the multi-instance use case (initialization made directly with
fsl_esdhc_initialize()).
This patch fixes this issue by adding a configuration field for the SDHC input
clock frequency.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Cc: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Cc: Jason Liu <r64343@freescale.com>
Cc: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@gmail.com>
The cache snooping feature of Freescale's eSDHC IP is not available on i.MX, so
disable it globally for this architecture. This avoids setting no_snoop for all
i.MX boards, and it prevents setting a reserved bit of a reserved register if
fsl_esdhc_mmc_init() is used on i.MX, like in
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/imx-common/cpu.c/cpu_mmc_init().
Since no_snoop was only used on i.MX, get rid of it BTW.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
The new API no longer uses the extra cd parameter that was used to store
the card presence state. Instead, this information is returned via the
function's return value. board_mmc_getcd() returns -1 to indicate that
no card-detection mechanism is implemented; 0 indicates that no card is
present and 1 is returned if it was detected that a card is present.
The rationale for this change can be found in the following email
thread:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-November/110180.html
In summary, the old API was not consistent with the rest of the MMC API
which always passes a struct mmc as the first parameter. Furthermore the
cd parameter was used to mean "card absence" in some implementations and
"card presence" in others.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Tested-by: Jason Liu <jason.hui@linaro.org>
Checkpatch.pl complains about the volatile qualifier in calls to
get_ram_size(). Remove this qualifier in the prototype and in the
calls where it is useless, and leave it only in the function body
where it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
