U-Boot build process for socrates board produces final U-Boot binary in
file u-boot-socrates.bin (by binman) And as a bonus it produces two
unusable broken binaries u-boot-dtb.bin and u-boot.bin (by Makefile).
Clean this up, so final U-Boot binary is in u-boot-dtb.bin
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
The current name is inconsistent with SPL which uses CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
and this makes it imposible to use CONFIG_VAL().
Rename it to resolve this problem.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Building of final u-boot.bin binary for mpc85xx via binman is needed only
when inserting DTB binary in the middle of the u-boot ELF binary (before
.bootpg and .resetvec ELF sections).
These requirements are met when CONFIG_MPC85XX_HAVE_RESET_VECTOR is enabled
(= generating .bootpg/.resetvec sections) and CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is enabled
(= inserting DTB binary).
So in all other cases use standard build procedure instead of custom
mpc85xx u-boot.bin Makefile target via binman.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Currently Makefile produces final mpc85xx image when SPL is not used in
custom file u-boot-with-dtb.bin. It is quite confusing name as build
process produce also intermediate file standard file u-boot-dtb.bin (which
is just intermediate and not bootable). Other platforms use u-boot.bin
(UBOOT_BIN) as standard name for final bootable raw image.
So change Makefile rules and binman to produce final bootable file for
mpc85xx also into file u-boot.bin. There is just need for mpc85xx to not
define default rule for u-boot.bin then instruct binman (via DTS file) to
store final image into u-boot.bin (instead of u-boot-with-dtb.bin) and
finally rename target u-boot-with-dtb.bin to u-boot.bin.
With this change are also removed custom Makefile hacks for mpc85xx that it
produced non-standard output file. And also updated documentation.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Commit e8c0e0064c ("powerpc: mpc85xx: Fix CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE support")
fixed SD card booting on mpc85xx boards but broke NOR booting on these
boards. Reason is that U-Boot build system for NOR images uses binman and
this binman ignores alignment defined in linker script. Instead it has own
config file where is alignment defined.
Fix binman alignment for mpc85xx boards to match what is _now_ defined in
linker script.
This change fixes building of U-Boot for NOR booting on P2020 board.
Fixes: e8c0e0064c ("powerpc: mpc85xx: Fix CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE support")
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Add CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS definition with the default value
in u-boot.dtsi to fix the build error below. In the configuration
header file of some MPC85xx boards, there is not the definition
of CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS, while CONFIG_SYS_MPC85XX_NO_RESETVEC
is also not defined. In this case, it will lack of definition of
CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS in u-boot.dtsi, and the address
0xfffffffc will be used as the boot page by default.
Error log:
DTC arch/powerpc/dts/mpc8548cds.dtb
DTC arch/powerpc/dts/mpc8548cds_36b.dtb
Error: arch/powerpc/dts/u-boot.dtsi:28.15-16 syntax error
FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
Error: arch/powerpc/dts/u-boot.dtsi:28.15-16 syntax error
FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
scripts/Makefile.lib:308: recipe for target
'arch/powerpc/dts/mpc8548cds.dtb' failed
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/dts/mpc8548cds.dtb] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
scripts/Makefile.lib:308: recipe for target
'arch/powerpc/dts/mpc8548cds_36b.dtb' failed
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/dts/mpc8548cds_36b.dtb] Error 1
dts/Makefile:38: recipe for target 'arch-dtbs' failed
make[1]: *** [arch-dtbs] Error 2
Makefile:1038: recipe for target 'dts/dt.dtb' failed
make: *** [dts/dt.dtb] Error 2
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jagdish.gediya@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>