Fix fallout from rust-lang/rust PR 60861
Fixes incoming breakage for unlanded https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60861.
Tests are passing locally; the Rust PR now needs to land first.
@Manishearth also says we'll want to split out to a `collapsible_if_let` once we have let-chains working in Rust nightly or something.
make needless_return work with void functions
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4181.
changelog: make needless_return work with void functions.
I don't think the failure is related to my changes, but I'm not sure 🤔
readme: update
Remove the crates.io badge from the readme.
Installing clippy via crates.io is deprecated and rustup should be used instead, thus we should not promote crates.io here.
Don't have clippy::correctness" lint category in bold letters, I think it looks a little off.
Fix breakage due to rust-lang/rust#61968
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only updates to the latest nightly, you can leave the
`changelog` entry as `none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- [ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- [ ] Executed `util/dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [ ] Run `cargo fmt`
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR -->
changelog: none
Remove the crates.io badge from the readme.
Installing clippy via crates.io is deprecated and rustup should be used instead, thus we should not promote crates.io here.
Don't have the entire clippy::correctness line in bold letters, I think it looks a little off.
Downgrade integer_division to restriction
I believe that this lint falls outside of the scope of opinionated pedantism of the other pedantic lints.
changelog: Downgrade integer_division lint from pedantic to restriction
fix suggestion for floating point inequality
It should be of the form `(a - b).abs() > error` whereas it was `(a - b).abs() < error` that is instead what should be used for equality.
fixes#4204.
changelog: fix suggestion for floating point inequality
