`never_loop`: suggest using an `if let` instead of a `for` loop
changelog: suggest using an `if let` statement instead of a `for` loop that [`never_loop`]s
Fixes#7537, r? `@camsteffen.`
Clean up examples in new lint suggestion template
I'm pretty sure they meant to write `bounds checking` when they wrote `bounce checking` but I could be wrong. After that I thought I could improve it further and ended up with this.
changelog: none
Cleanup usage of `span_to_snippet` and `LintContext::sess`
- avoid using `SourceMap::span_to_snippet` directly and use `clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt` instead
- don't use `LintContext::sess()` on `EarlyContext`s which have a `sess` field directly available, saving the import of `LintContext`
changelog: none
Don't emit `too_many_lines` for closures
changelog: don't emit the [`too_many_lines`] lint inside closures to avoir duplicated diagnostics.
Fixes#7517.
fix bug on mutable ref
fixes: #7524
This PR is related to issue #7524
changelog: [`extend_with_drain`] Improve code suggestion for mutable and immutable references
Updated `define_Conf!` to support multi-line doc comments
Updated the `define_Conf!` macro to support multi-line doc comments for readability. This also enables configuration documentation to have multiple paragraphs.
I've also added the `metadata-collector-lint` feature to the CI build and testing tasks. (I would think that we want this, now that we officially switched over)
---
Now a small informal explanation what this PR changes (just for fun):
* *Once upon a time there was a monster. It was handsome, supportive and happy to dig through the best source code it has ever seen. Spanning over hundreds of lines and reading over complete crates, it was purely marvels!*
*However, there was one region in its territory that wasn't clean and well formatted like the rest. That was the mighty `define_Conf` macro. The monster would have cleaned it up a long time ago but, the previous ruler of this kingdom a powerful Python script was prohibiting it. But now that the old king was slain in the great battle of rust-1.54.0, everything was possible again. Our lovely monster was now able to grab its cleaning equipment and get some nice formatting into the now unprotected area.*
*Said and done! Let this day go down in history!*
(I'll be the first to admit, that I'm a bit lost today. And I'm also procrastinating on some other discussions where I have some catching up to do... Oh, well, this was fun)
---
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995`
Updated config value name in change log for 1.54
Hey, I've noticed that the change log for 1.54 references the avoid_breaking_exported_api configuration with its Rust name, not the name it actually has in the config file. This should fix it for everyone, as the blog post references our change log on the master branch. Just a very small PR xD
changelog: none
(This is the change log xD)
r? `@flip1995`
Updated changelog for 1.55
This has again been a bit of work, but I'm happy to notice that my English is still improving, and I'm getting faster at these things. That's a very nice side effect of contributing and getting feedback on reviews 😊
Moving on, there were a few things that I was unsure about:
* The PR rust-lang/rust#86717 changes an old entry in the change log, is this worth mentioning? I've left it out for now.
* The stabilization of `cargo clippy --fix` is quite awesome and important IMO. It sadly gets a bit lost in the *Other* entry, as it's the last one. Do we maybe want to move it somewhere else or change the headline order for this release?
* I've listed the introduction of the new `suspicious` group under the *Moves and Deprecations* section. Is this alright, or should it be moved to the *Other* section as well?
* Last but definitely not least, some fun! I've used the 🎉 emoji in the `cargo clippy --fix` entry, is this okay?
Sorry for the bombardment of questions xD
---
The PR already includes the entries for the new metadata collection and website updates. These are not merged yet, but should probably be to make this correct. This might also require the commit hashes to be updated (Not sure on this, though). It would actually be super fitting to get this into this release as we also stabilize `--fix`. TODOs:
* [x] Merge metadata collection PRs:
1. #7279
2. #7298
3. #7420 (Hope to not get any merge conflicts)
---
[Rendered 📰](https://github.com/xFrednet/rust-clippy/blob/changelog-1-55/CHANGELOG.md)
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
Rename two lints to comply with our lint naming convention
self_named_constructor -> self_named_constructors
append_instead_of_extend -> extend_with_drain
We don't need to `register_renamed` those lints, since I'll backport them to beta, so the old names won't hit stable.
changelog: none
(I'll adapt the changelog before merging #7498)
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #7279 (Adapting the lint list to Clippy's new metadata format)
- #7298 (Switch CI to new metadata collection)
- #7420 (Update lint documentation to use markdown headlines)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
changelog: rollup
Update lint documentation to use markdown headlines
This PR updates all lint documentation to use markdown headlines. It additionally removed the *Known problems* section for lints without any problems. I've double-checked all automatic replacements, but a second pair of eyes is definitely appreciated!
I wasn't sure when you wanted to switch to the new metadata collection tomorrow, I therefore prepared this PR today. And that's it this is a standalone PR to keep the other related PRs reviewable.
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995`
cc: #7172
Note: This should be merged with the other metadata collection related PRs.
