Remove leftover plugin conf_file code
changelog: none
Removes dead code that used to support the following syntax:
```rust
#![plugin(clippy(conf_file="path/to/clippy's/configuration"))]
```
RLS (and others?) will need to remove the `&[]` from `clippy_lints::read_conf(&[], sess)`.
r? `@flip1995`
Implement `x.py test src/tools/clippy --bless`
- Add clippy_dev to the rust workspace
Before, it would give an error that it wasn't either included or
excluded from the workspace:
```
error: current package believes it's in a workspace when it's not:
current: /home/joshua/rustc/src/tools/clippy/clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
workspace: /home/joshua/rustc/Cargo.toml
this may be fixable by adding `src/tools/clippy/clippy_dev` to the `workspace.members` array of the manifest located at: /home/joshua/rustc/Cargo.toml
Alternatively, to keep it out of the workspace, add the package to the `workspace.exclude` array, or add an empty `[workspace]` table to the package's manifest.
```
- Change clippy's copy of compiletest not to special-case
rust-lang/rust. Using OUT_DIR confused `clippy_dev` and it couldn't find
the test outputs. This is one of the reasons why `cargo dev bless` used
to silently do nothing (the others were that `CARGO_TARGET_DIR` and
`PROFILE` weren't set appropriately).
- Run clippy_dev on test failure
I tested this by removing a couple lines from a stderr file, and they
were correctly replaced.
- Fix clippy_dev warnings
Don't rebuild rustdoc and clippy after checking bootstrap
This works by unconditionally passing -Z unstable-options to the
compiler. This has no affect in practice since bootstrap doesn't use
`deny(rustc::internal)`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82461.
r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
fix ice when checking rustc libstd
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 0 but the index is 0', src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/matches.rs:1595:53
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
I don't have a minimised testcase because I don't have time to reduce libstd down to a few lines right now.
---
changelog: fix index out of bounds access when checking rustc libstd
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 0 but the index is 0', src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/matches.rs:1595:53
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
I don't have a minimised testcase because I don't have time to reduce libstd down to a few lines right now.
- Add clippy_dev to the rust workspace
Before, it would give an error that it wasn't either included or
excluded from the workspace:
```
error: current package believes it's in a workspace when it's not:
current: /home/joshua/rustc/src/tools/clippy/clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
workspace: /home/joshua/rustc/Cargo.toml
this may be fixable by adding `src/tools/clippy/clippy_dev` to the `workspace.members` array of the manifest located at: /home/joshua/rustc/Cargo.toml
Alternatively, to keep it out of the workspace, add the package to the `workspace.exclude` array, or add an empty `[workspace]` table to the package's manifest.
```
- Change clippy's copy of compiletest not to special-case
rust-lang/rust. Using OUT_DIR confused `clippy_dev` and it couldn't find
the test outputs. This is one of the reasons why `cargo dev bless` used
to silently do nothing (the others were that `CARGO_TARGET_DIR` and
`PROFILE` weren't set appropriately).
- Run clippy_dev on test failure
I tested this by removing a couple lines from a stderr file, and they
were correctly replaced.
- Fix clippy_dev warnings
Fix FN in `iter_cloned_collect` with a large array
fixes#6808
changelog: Fix FN in `iter_cloned_collect` with a large array
I spotted that [is_iterable_array](a362a4d1d0/clippy_lints/src/loops/explicit_iter_loop.rs (L67-L75)) function that `explicit_iter_loop` lint is using only works for array sizes <= 32.
There is this comment:
> IntoIterator is currently only implemented for array sizes <= 32 in rustc
I'm a bit confused, because I read that [IntoIterator for arrays](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/core/array/mod.rs.html#194-201) with const generic `N` is stable since = "1.0.0". Although Const Generics MVP were stabilized in Rust 1.51.
Should I set MSRV for the current change? I will try to test with older compilers soon.
manual_unwrap_or: fix invalid code suggestion, due to macro expansion
fixes#6965
changelog: fix invalid code suggestion in `manual_unwrap_or` lint, due to macro expansion
Refactor MSRV aliases
changelog: Remove MSRV from `needless_question_mark` and change MSRV for `missing_const_for_fn` from 1.37.0 to 1.46.0.
First [mentioned on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Better.20MSRV.20testing.20idea/near/236215074).
* Moves MSRV constants into `clippy_utils::msrvs`. Now they are named to represent a stabilized feature flag or library item that is required for a lint's suggestion.
* `needless_question_mark` no longer has MSRV. Not needed since it does not suggest adding `?`.
* `missing_const_for_fn` MSRV was changed from 1.37.0 to 1.46.0. This seems to be a past mistake.
extend `single_element_loop` to match `.iter()`
This extends `single_element_loop` to also match `[..].iter()` in the loop argument. Related to #7125, but not completely fixing it due to the lint only firing if the array expression contains a local variable.
---
changelog: none
`single_component_path_imports`: ignore `pub(crate) use some_macro;`
Fixes#7106
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Ignore exporting a macro within a crate using `pub(crate) use some_macro;` for [`single_component_path_imports`]
Unused io amount detects `.read().ok()?`
fixes#7096
changelog: unused_io_amount now detect expertion like `.read().ok()?`, `.read().or_else(|err| ...)?` and similar expressions.
Better suggestions when returning macro calls.
Suggest changeing all the break expressions in a loop, not just the final statement.
Don't lint divergent functions.
Don't suggest returning the result of any divergent fuction.
Switch transmute_ptr_to_ptr to "pedantic" class.
Per discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6372, this lint has significant false positives.
changelog: transmute_ptr_to_ptr defaults to "allow".
Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
