Implement destructuring assignment for structs and slices
This is the second step towards implementing destructuring assignment (RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#2909, tracking issue: #71126). This PR is the second part of #71156, which was split up to allow for easier review.
Note that the first PR (#78748) is not merged yet, so it is included as the first commit in this one. I thought this would allow the review to start earlier because I have some time this weekend to respond to reviews. If ``@petrochenkov`` prefers to wait until the first PR is merged, I totally understand, of course.
This PR implements destructuring assignment for (tuple) structs and slices. In order to do this, the following *parser change* was necessary: struct expressions are not required to have a base expression, i.e. `Struct { a: 1, .. }` becomes legal (in order to act like a struct pattern).
Unfortunately, this PR slightly regresses the diagnostics implemented in #77283. However, it is only a missing help message in `src/test/ui/issues/issue-77218.rs`. Other instances of this diagnostic are not affected. Since I don't exactly understand how this help message works and how to fix it yet, I was hoping it's OK to regress this temporarily and fix it in a follow-up PR.
Thanks to ``@varkor`` who helped with the implementation, particularly around the struct rest changes.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Do not collect tokens for doc comments
Doc comment is a single token and AST has all the information to re-create it precisely.
Doc comments are also responsible for majority of calls to `collect_tokens` (with `num_calls == 1` and `num_calls == 0`, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78736).
(I also moved token collection into `fn parse_attribute` to deduplicate code a bit.)
r? `@Aaron1011`
instead of `find()` follows by `is_some()` on strings
Update clippy_lints/src/find_is_some_on_strs.rs
Co-authored-by: Takayuki Nakata <f.seasons017@gmail.com>
Update clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: Philipp Krones <hello@philkrones.com>
Add `let_underscore_drop`
This line generalizes `let_underscore_lock` (#5101) to warn about any initializer expression that implements `Drop`.
So, for example, the following would generate a warning:
```rust
struct Droppable;
impl Drop for Droppable {
fn drop(&mut self) {}
}
let _ = Droppable;
```
I tried to preserve the original `let_underscore_lock` functionality in the sense that the warning generated for
```rust
let _ = mutex.lock();
```
should be unchanged.
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: Add lint [`let_underscore_drop`]
rustc_ast: Do not panic by default when visiting macro calls
Panicking by default made sense when we didn't have HIR or MIR and everything worked on AST, but now all AST visitors run early and majority of them have to deal with macro calls, often by ignoring them.
The second commit renames `visit_mac` to `visit_mac_call`, the corresponding structures were renamed earlier in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69589.
Fix bad suggestions for `deref_addrof` and `try_err` lints
Fix bad suggestions when in macro expansion for `deref_addrof` and `try_err` lints.
Fixes: #6234Fixes: #6242Fixes: #6237
changelog: none
r? `@llogiq`
Fix example used in cargo_common_metadata
The previous example used in `cargo_common_metadata` included an authors field, even though the comment says it doesn't. And thus doesn't actually demonstrate an example of how the lint fails.
This removes that authors field from the _bad_ example and suggest to fix the _bad_ example by adding the authors field
changelog: Fix example used in `cargo_common_metadata`
We skip the lint if the `loop {}` is in the `#[panic_handler]` as the
main recommendation we give is to panic, which obviously isn't
possible in a panic handler.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Check when `from_utf8` is called from sliced byte array from string
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: Fix#5487: Add linter to check when `from_utf8` is called from sliced byte array from string.
"Respect" enums in `interior_mutable_const`
fixes#3962fixes#3825
Hello,
It might not be a good idea to submit another relatively large PR while I have an opened PR; but, I've finished this anyway. This may be able to wait for months.
Note: the code uses the MIR interpreter, which the author of #3962 thought unlikely to be a solution. This might be over-engineering; but, I think it's important to be able to work with the 'http' crate (#3825). (And, I don't want to write a MIR visitor)
---
changelog: fix a false positive in two `interior_mutable_const` lints where a constant with enums gets linted
even if it uses a clearly unfrozen variant
Provide diagnostic suggestion in ExprUseVisitor Delegate
The [Delegate trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38)) currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
r? `@ghost`
Add lint for 'field_reassign_with_default` #568
changelog: Add lint for field_reassign_with_default that checks if mutable object + field modification is used to edit a binding initialized with Default::default() instead of struct constructor.
Fixes#568
Notes:
- Checks for reassignment of one or more fields of a binding initialized with Default::default().
- Implemented using EarlyLintPass, might be future proofed better with LateLintPass.
- Does not trigger if Default::default() is used via another type implementing Default.
- This is a re-open of [PR#4761](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4761), but I couldn't figure out how to re-open that one so here's a new one with the requested changes :S
Use const sym where possible
I ran a regex search and replace to use const `sym` values where possible. This should give some performance boost by avoiding string interning at runtime.
Con: It is not as consistent as always using `sym!`.
I also changed an internal lint to suggest using `sym::{}`, making an assumption that this will always work for diagnostic items.
changelog: none
Add lint 'ref_option_ref' #1377
This lint checks for usage of `&Option<&T>` which can be simplified as `Option<&T>` as suggested in #1377.
This WIP PR is here to get feedback on the lint as there's more cases to be handled:
* statics/consts,
* associated types,
* type alias,
* function/method parameter/return,
* ADT definitions (struct/tuple struct fields, enum variants)
changelog: Add 'ref_option_ref' lint
Add lint: from_iter_instead_of_collect
Fixes#5679
This implements lint for `::from_iter()` from #5679 not the general issue (`std::ops::Add::add`, etc.).
This lint checks if expression is function call with `from_iter` name and if it's implementation of the `std::iter::FromIterator` trait.
changelog: Introduce from_iter_instead_of_collect lint
single_char_insert_str: lint using insert_str() on single-char literals and suggest insert()
Fixes#6026
changelog: add single_char_insert_str lint which lints using string.insert_str() with single char literals and suggests string.insert() with a char
The [Delegate
trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38))
currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
Implement rustc side of report-future-incompat
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71249
This is an alternative to `@pnkfelix's` initial implementation in https://github.com/pnkfelix/rust/commits/prototype-rustc-side-of-report-future-incompat (mainly because I started working before seeing that branch 😄 ).
My approach outputs the entire original `Diagnostic`, in a way that is compatible with incremental compilation. This is not yet integrated with compiletest, but can be used manually by passing `-Z emit-future-incompat-report` to `rustc`.
Several changes are made to support this feature:
* The `librustc_session/lint` module is moved to a new crate `librustc_lint_defs` (name bikesheddable). This allows accessing lint definitions from `librustc_errors`.
* The `Lint` struct is extended with an `Option<FutureBreakage>`. When present, it indicates that we should display a lint in the future-compat report. `FutureBreakage` contains additional information that we may want to display in the report (currently, a `date` field indicating when the crate will stop compiling).
* A new variant `rustc_error::Level::Allow` is added. This is used when constructing a diagnostic for a future-breakage lint that is marked as allowed (via `#[allow]` or `--cap-lints`). This allows us to capture any future-breakage diagnostics in one place, while still discarding them before they are passed to the `Emitter`.
* `DiagnosticId::Lint` is extended with a `has_future_breakage` field, indicating whether or not the `Lint` has future breakage information (and should therefore show up in the report).
* `Session` is given access to the `LintStore` via a new `SessionLintStore` trait (since `librustc_session` cannot directly reference `LintStore` without a cyclic dependency). We use this to turn a string `DiagnosticId::Lint` back into a `Lint`, to retrieve the `FutureBreakage` data.
Currently, `FutureBreakage.date` is always set to `None`. However, this could potentially be interpreted by Cargo in the future.
I've enabled the future-breakage report for the `ARRAY_INTO_ITER` lint, which can be used to test out this PR. The intent is to use the field to allow Cargo to determine the date of future breakage (as described in [RFC 2834](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2834-cargo-report-future-incompat.md)) without needing to parse the diagnostic itself.
cc `@pnkfelix`
- Implement `field_reassign_with_default` as a `LateLintPass`
- Avoid triggering `default_trait_access` on a span already linted by
`field_reassigned_with_default`
- Merge `default_trait_access` and `field_reassign_with_default` into
`Default`
- Co-authored-by: Eduardo Broto <ebroto@tutanota.com>
- Fixes#568
Update the existing arithmetic lint
re: #6209
Updates the lint to not the error message if RHS of binary operation `/` of `%` is a literal/constant that is not `0` or `-1`, as suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6209#issuecomment-715624354)
changelog: Expand [`integer_arithmetic`] to work with RHS literals and constants
fix the error-causing suggestion of 'borrowed_box'
Fixes#3128
Fix the suggestion of 'borrowed_box', which causes a syntax error because it misses necessary parentheses.
---
changelog: Fix the error-causing suggestion of 'borrowed_box'
Add lint for comparing to empty slices instead of using .is_empty()
Hey first time making a clippy lint
I added the implementation of the lint the `len_zero` since it shared a lot of the code, I would otherwise have to rewrite. Just tell me if the lint should use it's own file instead
changelog: Add lint for comparing to empty slices
Fixes#6217
Lint items after statements in local macro expansions
The items_after_statements lint was skipping all expansions. Instead
we should still lint local macros.
Fixes#578
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: The items_after_statements now applies to local macro expansions
No lint in macro for `toplevel_ref_arg`
Do not lint when the span is from a macro.
Question: shouldn't we extend this for external macros also ?
Fixes: #5849
changelog: none
Hex bin digit grouping
This revives and updates an old pr (#3391) for the current API.
Closes#2538.
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: Add [`unusual_byte_groupings`] lint.
Remove redundant `expect_local()` call
The field `owner` of `HirId` is `LocalDefId` and `hir_id.owner.to_def_id().expect_local()` is redundant. I wonder they were introduced in some rustups.
changelog: none
No lint with `cfg!` and fix sugg for macro in `needless_bool` lint
Don't lint if `cfg!` macro is one of the operand.
Fix suggestion when the span originated from a macro, using `hir_with_macro_callsite`.
Fixes: #3973
changelog: none
New lint: manual-range-contains
This fixes#1110, at least for the contains-suggesting part.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: new lint: manual-range-contains
Add lint for `&mut Mutex::lock`
Fixes#1765
changelog: Add lint [`mut_mutex_lock`] for `&mut Mutex::lock` and suggests using `&mut Mutex::get_mut` instead.
Update empty_loop documentation/message.
Originally part of #6161, but now this PR only deals with `std` crates
This change:
- Updates the `std` message .
- Updates the docs to mention how the busy loops should be fixed
- Gives examples of how to do this for `no_std` targets
- Updates the tests/stderr files to test this change.
changelog: Update `empty_loop` lint documentation
Split out statement attributes changes from #78306
This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).
This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.
---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
Add new lint for undropped ManuallyDrop values
Adds a new lint for the following code:
```rust
struct S;
impl Drop for S {
fn drop(&mut self) {
println!("drip drop");
}
}
fn main() {
// This will not drop the `S`!!!
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
unsafe {
// This will.
std::mem::ManuallyDrop::drop(&mut std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
}
}
```
The inner value of a `ManuallyDrop` will not be dropped unless the proper, unsafe drop function is called on it. This lint makes sure that a user does not accidently use the wrong function and forget to drop a `ManuallyDrop` value.
Fixes#5581.
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: none
Add lint for holding RefCell Ref across an await
Fixes#6008
This introduces the lint await_holding_refcell_ref. For async functions, we iterate
over all types in generator_interior_types and look for `core::cell::Ref` or `core::cell::RefMut`. If we find one then we emit a lint.
Heavily cribs from: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/5439
changelog: introduce the await_holding_refcell_ref lint
Lint unnecessary int-to-int and float-to-float casts
This is an implementation of a lint that detects unnecessary casts of number literals, as discussed here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6116
---
changelog: lint unnecessary as-casts of literals when they could be written using literal syntax.
Refactor trivially_copy_pass_by_ref and the new lint into pass_by_ref_or_value module
Update stderr of conf_unknown_key test
Rename lint to large_types_passed_by_value
Increase `pass_by_value_size_limit` default value to 256
Improve rules for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Improve tests for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Improve documentation for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Make minor corrections to pass_by_ref_or_value.rs suggested by clippy itself
Fix `large_types_passed_by_value` example and improve docs
pass_by_ref_or_value: Tweak check for mut annotation in params
large_types_passed_by_value: add tests for pub trait, trait impl and inline attributes
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
We also update the documentation to note that the remediations are
different for `std` and `no_std` crates.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Identical arguments on assert macro family
Lint when identical args are used on `assert_eq!`, `debug_assert_eq!`, `assert_ne!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros.
Added to the lint `eq_op`.
Common functions added to `utils/higher.rs`
Fixes: #3574Fixes: #4694
changelog: Lint on identical args when calling `assert_eq!`, `debug_assert_eq!`, `assert_ne!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros
BTreeMap: refactor Entry out of map.rs into its own file
btree/map.rs is approaching the 3000 line mark, splitting out the entry
code buys about 500 lines of headroom.
I've created this PR because the changes I've made in #77438 will push `map.rs` over the 3000 line limit and cause tidy to complain.
I picked `Entry` to factor out because it feels less tightly coupled to the rest of `BTreeMap` than the various iterator implementations.
Related: #60302
Sync from rust
Fix rustc breakage by running:
```rust
git subtree push -P src/tools/clippy git@github.com:josephlr/rust-clippy sync-from-rust
```
and then adding a commit that runs `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: none
The wrapper type led to tons of target.target
across the compiler. Its ptr_width field isn't
required any more, as target_pointer_width
is already present in parsed form.
Fix two ICEs caused by ty.is_{sized,freeze}
Fixes#6153
Properly fixes#6139
The test case in #6153 is kind of weird. Even removing one of the arguments of the `foo` function prevented the ICE. I think this test case is actually minimal.
changelog: none
Ref style link false positive
This PR does not fix#5834, but it records the problematic link text as a **known problem** inside `doc_markdown` lint.
r? `@flip1995`
- [ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [x] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: Document problematic link text style as known problem for `doc_markdown`
Expands `manual_memcpy` to lint ones with loop counters
Closes#1670
This PR expands `manual_memcpy` to lint ones with loop counters as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/1670#issuecomment-293280204
Although the current code is working, I have a couple of questions and concerns.
~~Firstly, I manually implemented `Clone` for `Sugg` because `AssocOp` lacks `Clone`. As `AssocOp` only holds an enum, which is `Copy`, as a value, it seems `AssocOp` can be `Clone`; but, I was not sure where to ask it. Should I make a PR to `rustc`?~~ The [PR]( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73629) was made.
Secondly, manual copying with loop counters are likely to trigger `needless_range_loop` and `explicit_counter_loop` along with `manual_memcpy`; in fact, I explicitly allowed them in the tests. Is there any way to disable these two lints when a code triggers `manual_memcpy`?
And, another thing I'd like to note is that `Sugg` adds unnecessary parentheses when expressions with parentheses passed to its `hir` function, as seen here:
```
error: it looks like you're manually copying between slices
--> $DIR/manual_memcpy.rs:145:14
|
LL | for i in 3..(3 + src.len()) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try replacing the loop by: `dst[3..((3 + src.len()))].clone_from_slice(&src[..((3 + src.len()) - 3)])
```
However, using the `hir` function is needed to prevent the suggestion causing errors when users use bitwise operations; and also this have already existed, for example: `verbose_bit_mask`. Thus, I think this is fine.
changelog: Expands `manual_memcpy` to lint ones with loop counters
Preserve raw strs for: format!(s) to s.to_string() lint
fixes#6142
clippy::useless_format will keep the source's string (after converting {{ and }} to { and }) when suggesting a change from format!() to .to_string() usage. Ie:
| let s = format!(r#""hello {{}}""#);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using `.to_string()`: `r#""hello {}""#.to_string()`
changelog: [`useless_format`]: preserve raw string literals when no arguments to `format!()` are provided.
New lint: Recommend using `ptr::eq` when possible
This is based almost entirely on the code available in the previous PR #4596. I merely updated the code to make it compile.
Fixes#3661.
- [ ] I'm not sure about the lint name, but it was the one used in the original PR.
- [X] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [X] `cargo test` passes locally
- [X] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- [X] Added lint documentation
- [X] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: none
clippy_lints: Do not warn against Box parameter in C FFI
changelog: [`boxed_local`]: don't lint in `extern fn` arguments
Fixes#5542.
When using C FFI, to handle pointers in parameters it is needed to
declare them as `Box` in its Rust-side signature. However, the current
linter warns against the usage of Box stating that "local variable
doesn't need to be boxed here".
This commit fixes it by ignoring functions whose Abi is C.
Downgrade string_lit_as_bytes to nursery
Between #1402 (regarding `to_owned`) and #4494 (regarding `impl Read`), as well as other confusion I've seen hit in my work codebase involving string_lit_as_bytes (`"...".as_bytes().into()`), I don't think this lint is at a quality to be enabled by default.
I would consider re-enabling this lint after it is updated to understand when the surrounding type information is sufficient to unsize `b"..."` to &\[u8\] without causing a type error.
As currently implemented, this lint is pushing people to write `&b"_"[..]` which is not an improvement over `"_".as_bytes()` as far as I am concerned.
---
changelog: Remove string_lit_as_bytes from default set of enabled lints
Fix unicode regexen with bytes::Regex
fixes#6005
The rationale for this is that since we wrote that lint, `bytes::Regex` was extended to be able to use unicode character classes.
---
changelog: [`invalid_regex`]: allow unicode character classes in bytes regex.
Fixes#5542.
When using C FFI, to handle pointers in parameters it is needed to
declare them as `Box` in its Rust-side signature. However, the current
linter warns against the usage of Box stating that "local variable
doesn't need to be boxed here".
This commit fixes it by ignoring functions whose Abi is Cdecl.
Downgrade rc_buffer to restriction
I think Arc\<Vec\<T\>\> and Arc\<String\> and similar are a totally reasonable data structure, as observed by others in the comments on [#6044](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/6044#event-3799579830) as well. Doing `Arc::make_mut(&mut self.vec).push(...)` or `Arc::make_mut(&mut self.string).push_str("...")` is a terrific and well performing copy-on-write pattern. Linting this with an enabled-by-default <kbd>performance</kbd> lint strikes me as an unacceptable false positive balance.
As of #6090 the documentation of this lint now contains:
> **Known problems:** This pattern can be desirable ...
which should indicate that we shouldn't be linting against correct, reasonable, well-performing patterns with an enabled-by-default lint.
Mentioning #6044, #6090.
r? `@yaahc,` who reviewed the lint.
---
changelog: Remove rc_buffer from default set of enabled lints
