Fix some `#[expect]` lint interaction
Fixing the first few lints that aren't caught by `#[expect]`. The root cause of these examples was, that the lint was emitted at the wrong location.
---
changelog: none
r? `@Jarcho`
cc: rust-lang/rust#97660
Improve lint doc consistency
changelog: none
This is a continuation of #8908.
Notable changes:
- Removed empty `Known Problems` sections
- Removed "Good"/"Bad" language (replaced with "Use instead")
- Removed (and added some 😄) duplication
- Ignored the [`create_dir`] example so it doesn't create `clippy_lints/foo` 😄
fix(lint): check const context
close: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8898
This PR fixes a bug in checked_conversions.
Thank you in advance.
changelog: check const context in checked_conversions.
This commit makes type folding more like the way chalk does it.
Currently, `TypeFoldable` has `fold_with` and `super_fold_with` methods.
- `fold_with` is the standard entry point, and defaults to calling
`super_fold_with`.
- `super_fold_with` does the actual work of traversing a type.
- For a few types of interest (`Ty`, `Region`, etc.) `fold_with` instead
calls into a `TypeFolder`, which can then call back into
`super_fold_with`.
With the new approach, `TypeFoldable` has `fold_with` and
`TypeSuperFoldable` has `super_fold_with`.
- `fold_with` is still the standard entry point, *and* it does the
actual work of traversing a type, for all types except types of
interest.
- `super_fold_with` is only implemented for the types of interest.
Benefits of the new model.
- I find it easier to understand. The distinction between types of
interest and other types is clearer, and `super_fold_with` doesn't
exist for most types.
- With the current model is easy to get confused and implement a
`super_fold_with` method that should be left defaulted. (Some of the
precursor commits fixed such cases.)
- With the current model it's easy to call `super_fold_with` within
`TypeFolder` impls where `fold_with` should be called. The new
approach makes this mistake impossible, and this commit fixes a number
of such cases.
- It's potentially faster, because it avoids the `fold_with` ->
`super_fold_with` call in all cases except types of interest. A lot of
the time the compile would inline those away, but not necessarily
always.
* Don't lint on `.cloned().flatten()` when `T::Item` doesn't implement `IntoIterator`
* Reduce verbosity of lint message
* Narrow down the scope of the replacement range
List configuration values can now be extended instead of replaced
I've seen some `clippy.toml` files, that have a few additions to the default list of a configuration and then a copy of our default. The list will therefore not be updated, when we add new names. This change should make it simple for new users to append values instead of replacing them.
I'm uncertain if the documentation of the `".."` is apparent. Any suggestions are welcome. I've also check that the lint list displays the examples correctly.
<details>
<summary>Lint list screenshots</summary>
</details>
---
changelog: enhancement: [`doc_markdown`]: Users can now indicate, that the `doc-valid-idents` should extend the default and not replace it
changelog: enhancement: [`blacklisted-name`]: Users can now indicate, that the `blacklisted-names` should extend the default and not replace it
Closes: #8877
That's it. Have a fantastic weekend to everyone reading this. Here is a cookie 🍪
Add new lint [`needless_parens_on_range_literals`]
changelog: Adds a new lint [`needless_parens_on_range_literals`] to warn on needless braces on literals in a range statement
For example, the lint would catch
```log
error: needless parenthesis on range literals can be removed
--> $DIR/needless_parens_on_range_literals.rs:8:13
|
LL | let _ = ('a')..=('z');
| ^^^^^ help: try: `'a'`
|
= note: `-D clippy::needless-parens-on-range-literals` implied by `-D warnings`
```
improve [`for_loops_over_fallibles`] to detect the usage of iter, iter_mut and into_iterator
fix#6762
detects code like
```rust
for _ in option.iter() {
//..
}
```
changelog: Improve [`for_loops_over_fallibles`] to detect `for _ in option.iter() {}` or using `iter_mut()` or `into_iterator()`.
Remove the unneeded wrapping and unwrapping in suggestion creation.
Collecting to Option<Vec<_>> only returns None if one of the elements is
None and that is never the case here.
fix(manual_find_map and manual_filter_map): check clone method
close#8920
Added conditional branching when the clone method is used.
Thank you in advance.
---
changelog: check `clone()` and other variant preserving methods in [`manual_find_map`] and [`manual_filter_map`]
When setting suggestion for significant_drop_in_scrutinee, add suggestion for MoveAndClone for non-ref
When trying to set the current suggestion, if the type of the expression
is not a reference and it is not trivially pure clone copy, we should still
trigger and emit a lint message. Since this fix may require cloning an
expensive-to-clone type, do not attempt to offer a suggested fix.
This change means that matches generated from TryDesugar and AwaitDesugar
would normally trigger a lint, but they are out of scope for this lint,
so we will explicitly ignore matches with sources of TryDesugar or
AwaitDesugar.
changelog: Update for ``[`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]`` to correctly
emit lint messages for cases where the type is not a reference *and*
not trivially pure clone copy.
changelog: [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]: No longer lint on Try `?`
and `await` desugared expressions.
remove `large_enum_variant` suggestion for `Copy` types
Replaces the (erroneous) suggestion on `large_enum_variant` for `Copy` types by a note. This fixes#8894.
---
changelog: none
[1/N] Implement Arithmetic lint
Assuming that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8903 is OK, this PR starts the creation of the `Arithmetic` lint with configurable types.
My current struggle to get a rustc review inspired me to create smaller PRs in order to easy review and make merges as fast as possible. So the first step here only moves the `arithmetic.rs` file to `numeric_arithmetic.rs` to make room for the new lint.
--
changelog: none
Make docs more consistent
changelog: none
This just fixes some docs to make them more consistent. I mostly just changed `// Good`, `// Bad`, etc to `Use instead:`.
Set correct `ParamEnv` for `derive_partial_eq_without_eq`
fixes#8867
changelog: Handle differing predicates applied by `#[derive(PartialEq)]` and `#[derive(Eq)]` in `derive_partial_eq_without_eq`
new lint: `borrow_deref_ref`
changelog: ``[`borrow_deref_ref`]``
Related pr: #6837#7577
`@Jarcho` Could you please give a review?
`cargo lintcheck` gives no false negative (but tested crates are out-of-date).
TODO:
1. Not sure the name. `deref_on_immutable_ref` or some others?
`SourceFile::lines` is a big part of metadata. It's stored in a compressed form
(a difference list) to save disk space. Decoding it is a big fraction of
compile time for very small crates/programs.
This commit introduces a new type `SourceFileLines` which has a `Lines`
form and a `Diffs` form. The latter is used when the metadata is first
read, and it is only decoded into the `Lines` form when line data is
actually needed. This avoids the decoding cost for many files,
especially in `std`. It's a performance win of up to 15% for tiny
crates/programs where metadata decoding is a high part of compilation
costs.
A `Lock` is needed because the methods that access lines data (which can
trigger decoding) take `&self` rather than `&mut self`. To allow for this,
`SourceFile::lines` now takes a `FnMut` that operates on the lines slice rather
than returning the lines slice.
Fix `manual_range_contains` false negative with chains of `&&` and `||`
Fixes#8745
Since the precedence for `&&` is the same as itself the HIR for a chain of `&&` ends up with a right skewed tree like:
```
&&
/ \
&& c2
/ \
... c1
```
So only the leftmost `&&` was actually "fully" checked, the top level was just `c2` and `&&` so the `manual_range_contains` lint won't apply. This change makes it also check `c2` with `c1`.
There's a bit of a hacky solution in the [second commit](257f09776a) to check if the number of open/closing parens in the snippet match. This is to prevent a case like `((x % 2 == 0) || (x < 0)) || (x >= 10)` from offering a suggestion like `((x % 2 == 0) || !(0..10).contains(&x)` which now won't compile.
Any suggestions for that paren hack welcome, kinda new to working on this so not too sure about possible solutions :) it's weird because I don't know how else to check for parens in HIR considering they're removed when lowering AST.
changelog: Fix [`manual_range_contains`] false negative with chains of `&&` and `||`
Don't lint `useless_transmute` on types with erased regions
fixes#6356fixes#3340fixes#2906
This should get a proper fix at some point, but this at least gets the lint running on some types.
cc #5343
changelog: Don't lint `useless_transmute` on types with erased regions
`cast_abs_to_unsigned`: do not remove cast if it's required
Fixes#8873
If `iX` is not cast to `uX` then keep the cast rather than removing it
changelog: [`cast_abs_to_unsigned`]: do not remove cast if it's required
needless_late_init: fix ICE when all branches return the never type
Fixes#8911
When the assignment is done in a match guard or the if condition and all of the branches return the never type `assignment_suggestions` would return an empty `Vec` which caused the ICE. It now returns `None` in that scenario
Also moves some tests to the top of the file
changelog: ICE Fixes: [`needless_late_init`] #8911
Fix `[use_self]` false negative with on struct and tuple struct patterns
fixes#8845
changelog: Triggered the warning for ``[`use_self`]`` on `TupleStruct` and `Struct` patterns, whereas currently it's only triggered for `Path` patterns
