Improvement for `equatable_if_let`
fixes#9221
This PR makes sure that enums or structs not implementing `PartialEq` trait but still using the `if let` patterns can be linted to be rewritten with `matches!`.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[ ] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: Improve [`equatable_if_let`] with additional `matches!` suggestions.
Fix allow_attributes_without_reason applying to external crate macros
Previously the `clippy::allow_attributes_without_reason` lint would apply to external crate macros. Many macros in the Rust ecosystem include these `allow` attributes without adding a reason, making this lint pretty much unusable in any sizable Rust project.
This commit fixes that by adding a check to the lint if the attribute is from an external crate macro and returning early.
```
changelog: [`allow_attributes_without_reason`]: allow_attributes_without_reason no longer applies to external crate macros
```
fix: support `map_or` for `or_fun_call` lint
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8993
The methods defined in `KNOW_TYPES`, except for `map_or`, accepts only one argument, so the matching `if let [arg] = args` works only for these methods.
This PR adds `rest_arg` argument to `check_general_case` method and handling of cases with two arguments to support `map_or`.
changelog: `or_fun_call` support `map_or`
* add `rest_arg` to pass second argument from `map_or(U, F)`
* extract some procedures into closure
* add `rest_arg` to pass second argument from `map_or(U, F)`
* extract some procedures into closure
refac: rename rest_arg/second_arg
refac: organize function argument order
* put `second_arg` next to `arg` argument
Mark `let_underscore_lock` and `let_underscore_drop` as uplifted
Here I've renamed both the uplifted lints, however rustc's `let_underscore_lock` is slightly less capable than the clippy lint as it doesn't catch `parking_lot` types or `Result<Guard, ..>`, should we still remove it? The `Result` change looks like it was unintentional to me so that could probably be fixed upstream
changelog: Uplift [`let_underscore_drop`] to rustc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97739
changelog: Remove overlap between rustc's `let_underscore_lock` and Clippy's [`let_underscore_lock`]
r? `@flip1995`
[`unwrap_used`], [`expect_used`] do not lint in `test` cfg
changelog: [`unwrap_used`], [`expect_used`] do not lint in `test` cfg
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9612
I've updated the doc and used `cfg` acronym, not sure if `conditional compiler flag` would have been better
fix `box-default` ignoring trait objects' types
This avoids removing the turbofish when the `Box` type is a `dyn` or `impl _`.
This fixes#9621.
---
changelog: none
Move MSRV tests into the lint specific test files
There are currently two ways MSRV tests are done in the ui test suite, adding a case to the `#![clippy::msrv = "1.0"]` `tests/ui/min_rust_version_attr.rs` or adding the two `msrv_1_xx` functions to the test file of the lint in question
This updates the clippy book to suggest the `msrv_1_xx` style, and replaces the tests in `tests/ui/min_rust_version_attr.rs` with ones of that style
Almost the entire diff is just moving stuff around as a result, I made sure to check the line numbers the lints are emitted at correspond with the right `msrv` case, so feel free to only skim that part
changelog: none
Add `lintcheck` to packages linted by `dogfood` test
Currently, `lintcheck` is not checked by the `dogfood` test. I assume that is not intentional. If it is intentional, then this PR can be ignored.
changelog: Add `lintcheck` to packages linted by `dogfood` test
[`collapsible_match`] specify field name when destructuring structs
changelog: [`collapsible_match`] specify field name when destructuring structs
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9647
I wasn't the sure about the best way to convey the message in the lint message since it does not use suggestion. Because I liked the former output highlighting both spans, I've left it as before, only modifying the span label.
Fix bug introduced by #9386#9386 introduced a potential out-of-bounds array access. Specifically, a location returned by `local_assignments` could have [`location.statement_index` equal to `mir.basic_blocks[location.block].statements.len()`](b8a9a507bf/clippy_utils/src/mir/mod.rs (L129)), in which case the location would refer to the block terminator:
b8a9a507bf/clippy_lints/src/dereference.rs (L1204-L1206)
I suspect the bug is not triggerable now, because of checks leading up to where it occurs. But a future code change could make it triggerable. Hence, it should be fixed.
r? `@Jarcho`
changelog: none
Update Applicability of `redundant_allocation` lint from `MachineApplicable` to `MaybeIncorrect`
This changes `redundant_allocation` lint from MachineApplicable to MaybeIncorrect
```
changelog: [`redundant_allocation]: Change Applicability from MachineApplicable to MaybeIncorrect
```
fixes#6243
---
changelog: [`redundant_allocation`]: Change Applicability from MachineApplicable to MaybeIncorrect
Add `unused_format_specs` lint
Currently catches two cases:
An empty precision specifier:
```rust
// the same as {}
println!("{:.}", x);
```
And using formatting specs on `format_args!()`:
```rust
// prints `x.`, not `x .`
println("{:5}.", format_args!("x"));
```
changelog: new lint: [`unused_format_specs`]
[`unnecessary_cast`] Do not lint negative hexadecimal literals when cast as floats
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9603
changelog: [`unnecessary_cast`] Do not lint negative hexadecimal literals when cast as floats
[`zero_prefixed_literal`] Do not advise to use octal form if not possible
fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9651
changelog: [`zero_prefixed_literal`] Do not advise to use octal form if not possible
Add new lint `partial_pub_fields`
Signed-off-by: TennyZhuang <zty0826@gmail.com>
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: `partial_pub_fields`: new lint to disallow partial fields of a struct be pub
Resolve#9604
Expand internal lint `unnecessary_def_path`
This PR does essentially two things:
* Separates the internal lints into modules by pass. (`internal_lints.rs` was over 1400 lines, which is a little unruly IMHO.)
* ~Adds a new~ Expands the `unnecessary_def_path` internal lint to flag hardcoded paths to diagnostic and language items.
My understanding is that the latter is currently done by reviewers. Automating this process should make things easier for both reviewers and contributors.
I could make the first bullet a separate PR, or remove it entirely, if desired.
changelog: Add internal lint `diagnostic_item_path`
fix `box-default` linting `no_std` non-boxes
This fixes#9653 by doing the check against the `Box` type correctly even if `Box` isn't there, as in `no_std` code. Thanks to `@lukas-code` for opening the issue and supplying a reproducer!
---
changelog: none
