Allow giving reasons for `disallowed_types`
Similar to #7609 but for the `disallowed_type` lint. The permitted form of configuration is the same as for `disallowed_methods`.
changelog: Allow giving reasons for [`disallowed_type`]
Fix FP in external macros for `mut_mut` lint
Fix FP in `mut_mut` lint when type is defined in external macros.
fixes: #6922
changelog: [`mut_mut`] Fix FP when type is defined in external macros
Refactor `clippy::match_ref_pats` to check for multiple reference patterns
fixes#7740
When there is only one pattern, to begin with, i.e. a single deref(`&`), then in such cases we suppress `clippy::match_ref_pats`.
This is done by checking the count of the reference pattern and emitting `clippy::match_ref_pats` when more than one pattern is present.
Removed certain errors in the `stderr` tests as they would not be triggered.
changelog: Refactor `clippy::match_ref_pats` to check for multiple reference patterns
Fix false positive when `Drop` and `Copy` involved in `field_reassign_with_default` lint
Fix FP in `field_reassign_with_default` lint when type implements `Drop` but not all fields are `Copy`.
fixes: #6312
changelog: [`field_reassign_with_default`] Fix FP when `Drop` and `Copy` are involved
Don't trigger semicolon_if_nothing_returned in expanded code
Fixes#7768
Before, this lint didn't trigger on macros. With rust-lang/rust#88175
this isn't enough anymore. In this PR a `WhileLoop` desugaring kind was
introduced. This overrides the span of expanded expressions when
lowering the while loop. So if a while loop is in a macro, the
expressions that it expands to are no longer marked with
`ExpnKind::Macro`, but with `ExpnKind::Desugaring`. In general, this is
the correct behavior and the same that is done for `ForLoop`s. It just
tripped up this lint.
r? `@camsteffen`
changelog: [`semicolon_if_nothing_returned`]: Fix regression on macros containing while loops
Before this lint didn't trigger on macros. With rust-lang/rust#88175
this isn't enough anymore. In this PR a `WhileLoop` desugaring kind was
introduced. This overrides the span of expanded expressions when
lowering the while loop. So if a while loop is in a macro, the
expressions that it expands to are no longer marked with
`ExpnKind::Macro`, but with `ExpnKind::Desugaring`. In general, this is
the correct behavior and the same that is done for `ForLoop`s. It just
tripped up this lint.
Restriction lint for function pointer casts
The existing lints for function pointer casts cover the cases where a cast is non-portable or would result in truncation, however there's currently no way to forbid numeric function pointer casts entirely.
I've added a new lint `fn_to_numeric_cast_any`, which allows one to ban _all_ numeric function pointer casts, including to `usize`. This is useful if you're writing high-level Rust and want to opt-out of potentially surprising behaviour, avoiding silent bugs from forgotten parentheses, e.g.
```rust
fn foo() -> u32 {
10
}
fn main() {
let _ = foo as usize; // oops, forgot to call foo and got a random address instead!
}
```
~~I'm open to suggestions for the naming of the lint, because `fn_to_numeric_cast_any` is a bit clunky. Ideally I'd call this lint `fn_to_numeric_cast`, but that name is already taken for the more specific lint~~. We've stuck with `fn_to_numeric_cast_any` to avoid renaming the existing lint, or choosing a different name that's too generic (like `fn_cast`).
I'm also open to changing the suggestion behaviour, as adding parentheses is only one of many possible ways to fix the lint.
changelog: add ``[`fn_to_numeric_cast_any`]`` restriction lint
Make `shadow_reuse` suggestion less verbose
Closes#7764
Make `shadow_reuse` suggestion less verbose.
changelog: [`shadow_reuse`] does not warn shadowing statement
make test module detection more strict
I started with some small improvements to clippy_utils/src/lib.rs, but then found that our "test" module detection would also catch words containing "test" like e.g. "attestation". So I made this a bit more strict (splitting by `'_'` and checking for `test` or `tests`), adding a test case as I went.
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: none
Revert `update_lints` module list generating code
This commit reverts the module list generation code to what it was
before the change to `include!` it and generates better output.
changelog: none
Useless exponent
Closes#7745
I'm open to some thoughts on dropping the exponents on suggestions when it's zero. I personally don't see any problem on this.
changelog: [`useless_exponent`] suggestion drops exponent when exponent value is zero
Move module declarations back into lib.rs
With #7673 we moved a lot of things from lib.rs to lib.foo.rs. Unfortunately, rustfmt doesn't seem to work when module declarations are included via `include!` (and trying the `mod foo; use foo::*;` trick doesn't seem to work much either in our specific case).
With this PR we continue generating everything in subfiles except for module declarations, which are now generated within lib.rs.
changelog: none
improved help message for `suspicious_map`
`suspicious_map`'s help message assumes that the literal behavior is never the intended one, although it's sometimes. This PR adds a mention of `inspect`, offering a idiomatic alternative.
fixes#7767
---
changelog: Improved help message of [`suspicious_map`].
Add lint `equatable_if_let`
This is my attempt for #1716. There is a major false positive, which is people may implement `PartialEq` in a different way. It is unactionable at the moment so I put it into `nursery`.
There is a trait `StructuralPartialEq` for solving this problem which is promising but it has several problems currently:
* Integers and tuples doesn't implement it.
* Some types wrongly implement it, like `Option<T>` when `T` doesn't implement it.
I consider them bugs and against the propose of `StructuralPartialEq`. When they become fixed, this lint can become a useful lint with a single line change.
changelog: New lint: [`equatable_if_let`]
Add expansion to while desugar spans
In the same vein as #88163, this reverts a change in Clippy behavior as a result of #80357 (and reverts some `#[allow]`s): This changes `clippy::blocks_in_if_conditions` to not fire on `while` loops. Though we might actually want Clippy to lint those cases, we should introduce the change purposefully, with tests, and possibly under a different lint name.
The actual change here is to add a desugaring expansion to the spans when lowering a `while` loop.
r? `@Manishearth`
