Rename `integer_arithmetic`
The lack of official feedback in #10200 made me give up on pursuing the matter but after yet another use-case that is not handled by `integer_arithmetic` (#10615), I think it is worth trying again.
---
changelog: Move/Deprecation: Rename `integer_arithmetic` to `arithmetic_side_effects`
[#10674](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10674)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
don't remove `dbg!` in arbitrary expressions
Fixes#9914
The `dbg_macro` lint replaces empty `dbg!` invocations with the empty string in its suggestion, which is not always valid code in certain contexts (e.g. `let _ = dbg!();` becomes `let _ = ;`). This PR changes it to `()`, which should always be valid where `dbg!()` is valid (`dbg!()` with no arguments evaluates to `()`).
It also special-cases "standalone" `dbg!();` expression statements, where it will suggest removing the whole statement entirely like it did before.
changelog: [`dbg_macro`]: don't remove `dbg!()` in arbitrary expressions as it sometimes results in syntax errors
Remove unnecessary `clone` from `needless_collect` example
The example for [clippy::needless_collect](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#needless_collect) is written as follows:
```rust
let len = iterator.clone().collect::<Vec<_>>().len();
// should be
let len = iterator.count();
```
With this change, the unnecessary `clone()` is removed and the the standard
### Example
```rust
// original
```
Use instead:
```rust
// improved
```
structure is followed.
Discussion: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/discussions/10784#discussion-5198885
changelog: [`needless_collect`]: Cleaned up the example in the lint documentation.
fix [`invalid_regex`] not recognizing new syntax introduced after regex-1.8.0
fixes: #10680
---
changelog: fix [`invalid_regex`] not recognizing new syntax introduced after regex-1.8.0
bump up `regex-syntax` dependency version to 0.7.0
Fix: Some suggestions generated by the option_if_let_else lint did not compile
This addresses a bug in Clippy where the fix suggestend by the `option_if_let_else` lint would not compile for `Result`s which have an impure expression in the `else` branch.
---
changelog: [`option_if_let_else`]: Fixed incorrect suggestion for `Result`s
[#10337](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10337)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Fixes#10335.
[arithmetic_side_effects] Consider referenced allowed or hard-coded types
Fix#10767
```
changelog: [`arithmetic_side_effects`]: Do not fire when dealing with allowed or hard-coded types that are referenced.
```
fix: warn on empty line outer AttrKind::DocComment
changelog: [`empty_line_after_doc_comments`]: add lint for checking empty lines after rustdoc comments.
Fixes: #10395
add lint `manual_next_back`
changelog: [`manual_next_back`]: checks for manual reverse iteration (`.rev().next()`) of a `DoubleEndedIterator`
fixes#10274
Add configuration options to `--explain`
This PR rearranges some modules, taking `metadata_collector` out of `internal_lints` and making public just the necessary functions for `explain()` to use.
The output looks something like this:
```sh
$ cargo run --bin cargo-clippy --manifest-path ../rust-clippy/Cargo.toml -- --explain cognitive_complexity
### What it does
Checks for methods with high cognitive complexity.
### Why is this bad?
Methods of high cognitive complexity tend to be hard to
both read and maintain. Also LLVM will tend to optimize small methods better.
### Known problems
Sometimes it's hard to find a way to reduce the
complexity.
### Example
You'll see it when you get the warning.
========================================
Configuration for clippy::cognitive_complexity:
- cognitive-complexity-threshold: The maximum cognitive complexity a function can have (default: 25)
```
Fixes#9990
r? `@xFrednet`
---
changelog: Docs: `cargo clippy --explain LINT` now shows possible configuration options for the explained lint
[#10751](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10751)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Extend `trait_duplication_in_bounds` to cover trait objects
This PR extends `trait_duplication_in_bounds` to cover trait objects.
Currently,
```rs
fn foo(_a: &(dyn Any + Send + Send)) {}
```
generates no warnings. With this PR, it will complain about a duplicate trait and can remove it
Moved from rust-lang/rust#110991
changelog: [`trait_duplication_in_bounds`]: warn on duplicate trait object constraints
fix: `wildcard_imports` ignore `test.rs` files
Adds a check to see if the building crate is a test one, if so, ignore it
---
Closes#10580
changelog:[`wildcard_imports`]: Add a check to ignore files named `test.rs` and `tests.rs`
Ignore `borrow_deref_ref` warnings in code from procedural macros.
Don't linting `borrow_deref_ref` if code was generated by procedural macro.
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8971
changelog: [`borrow_deref_ref`] avoiding warnings in macro-generated code
initial clippy::ref_pattern implementation
This implements a new lint that discourages the use of the `ref` keyword as outlined in #9010. I think there are still some things to improve about this lint, but I need some feedback before I can implement those.
- [x] ~~Maybe it's desirable that a quick fix is listed too, instead of a generic `avoid using the ref keyword` lint.~~
- [x] `let ref x = y` already has a lint (`clippy::toplevel_ref_arg`). This implementation will report this too, so you get two lints for the same issue, which is not great. I don't really know a way around this though.
- [X] The dogfood test is currently failing locally, though I ran `cargo clippy -- -D clippy::all -D clippy::pedantic` and got no output, so I'm not sure why this is.
Any help with these would be greatly appreciated.
fixes#9010
changelog: [`ref_pattern`]: newly added lint
