Introduce UnordMap, UnordSet, and UnordBag (MCP 533)
This is the start of implementing [MCP 533](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/533).
I followed `@eddyb's` suggestion of naming the collection types `Unord(Map/Set/Bag)` which is a bit easier to type than `Unordered(Map/Set/Bag)`
r? `@eddyb`
privacy: Rename "accessibility levels" to "effective visibilities"
And a couple of other naming and comment tweaks.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054
For `enum Level` I initially used naming `enum EffectiveVisibilityLevel`, but it was too long and inconvenient because it's used pretty often.
So I shortened it to just `Level`, if it needs to be used from some context where this name would be ambiguous, then it can be imported with renaming like `use rustc_middle::privacy::Level as EffVisLevel` or something.
poll_fn and Unpin: fix pinning
See [IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/surprising-soundness-trouble-around-pollfn/17484) for details: currently `poll_fn` is very subtle to use, since it does not pin the closure, so creating a `Pin::get_unchcked(&mut capture)` inside the closure is unsound. This leads to actual miscompilations with `futures::join!`.
IMO the proper fix is to pin the closure when the future is pinned, which is achieved by changing the `Unpin` implementation. This is a breaking change though. 1.64.0 was *just* released, so maybe this is still okay?
The alternative would be to add some strong comments to the docs saying that closure captures are *not pinned* and doing `Pin::get_unchecked` on them is unsound.
Fix line numbers for MIR inlined code
`should_collapse_debuginfo` detects if the specified span is part of a
macro expansion however it does this by checking if the span is anything
other than a normal (non-expanded) kind, then the span sequence is
walked backwards to the root span.
This doesn't work when the MIR inliner inlines code as it creates spans
with expansion information set to `ExprKind::Inlined` and results in the
line number being attributed to the inline callsite rather than the
normal line number of the inlined code.
Fixes#103068
Remove `commit_if_ok` probe from NLL type relation
It was not really necessary to add the `commit_if_ok` in #100092 -- I added it to protect us against weird inference error messages due to recursive RPIT calls, but we are always on the error path when this happens anyways, and I can't come up with an example that makes this manifest.
Fixes#103599
r? `@oli-obk` since you reviewed #100092, feel free to re-roll.
🅱️📢 beta-nominating this since it's on beta (which forks in ~a week~ two days 😨) -- worst case we could revert the original PR on beta and land this on nightly, to give it some extra soak time...
Add Target Tier Policy notification.
This adds a notification posted to PRs when they add/modify a target spec.
This was hard-coded in highfive. I forgot to include this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103492.
Shorten the `lookup_line` code slightly
The `match` looks like it's exactly the same as `checked_sub(1)`, so we might as well see if perf says we can just do that to save a couple lines.
Use ptr::metadata in <[T]>::len implementation
This avoids duplication of ptr::metadata code.
I believe this is acceptable as the previous approach essentially duplicated `ptr::metadata` because back then `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable` annotation did not exist.
I would like somebody to ping `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` as the documentation says:
> Always ping `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` if you are adding more rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable attributes to any const fn.
Upgrade dist-mips*-linux to ubuntu:22.04 + crosstool-ng
These have no change in compatibility, still Linux 4.4 and glibc 2.23.
The main motivation for upgrading is that LLVM 16 will require at least GCC 7.1. Using crosstool-ng lets us choose our own toolchain versions, and then the Ubuntu version doesn't matter so much, just for the host compilation while we cross-compile.
Eliminate 280-byte memset from ReadDir iterator
This guy:
1536ab1b38/library/std/src/sys/unix/fs.rs (L589)
It turns out `libc::dirent64` is quite big—https://docs.rs/libc/0.2.135/libc/struct.dirent64.html. In #103135 this memset accounted for 0.9% of the runtime of iterating a big directory.
Almost none of the big zeroed value is ever used. We memcpy a tiny prefix (19 bytes) into it, and then read just 9 bytes (`d_ino` and `d_type`) back out. We can read exactly those 9 bytes we need directly from the original entry_ptr instead.
## History
This code got added in #93459 and tweaked in #94272 and #94750.
Prior to #93459, there was no memset but a full 280 bytes were being copied from the entry_ptr.
<table><tr><td>copy 280 bytes</td></tr></table>
This was not legal because not all of those bytes might be initialized, or even allocated, depending on the length of the directory entry's name, leading to a segfault. That PR fixed the segfault by creating a new zeroed dirent64 and copying just the guaranteed initialized prefix into it.
<table><tr><td>memset 280 bytes</td><td>copy 19 bytes</td></tr></table>
However this was still buggy because it used `addr_of!((*entry_ptr).d_name)`, which is considered UB by Miri in the case that the full extent of entry_ptr is not in bounds of the same allocation. (Arguably this shouldn't be a requirement, but here we are.)
The UB got fixed by #94272 by replacing `addr_of` with some pointer manipulation based on `offset_from`, but still fundamentally the same operation.
<table><tr><td>memset 280 bytes</td><td>copy 19 bytes</td></tr></table>
Then #94750 noticed that only 9 of those 19 bytes were even being used, so we could pick out only those 9 to put in the ReadDir value.
<table><tr><td>memset 280 bytes</td><td>copy 19 bytes</td><td>copy 9 bytes</td></tr></table>
After my PR we just grab the 9 needed bytes directly from entry_ptr.
<table><tr><td>copy 9 bytes</td></tr></table>
The resulting code is more complex but I believe still worthwhile to land for the following reason. This is an extremely straightforward thing to accomplish in C and clearly libc assumes that; literally just `entry_ptr->d_name`. The extra work in comparison to accomplish it in Rust is not an example of any actual safety being provided by Rust. I believe it's useful to have uncovered that and think about what could be done in the standard library or language to support this obvious operation better.
## References
- https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/readdir.3.html
Implement invocation location config
This allows setting the working directory for build-scripts on flycheck
Complements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/13128
This will be followed up by one more PR that adds a few simple interpolation vars for `overrideCommand`, with that we should cover the needs for most build systems I believe.
Support const generics for builtin derive macro
Fixes#13121
We have been treating every generic parameter as type parameter during builtin derive macro expansion. This patch adds support for const generics in such expansions.
stop using `ty::UnevaluatedConst` directly
best reviewed commit by commit.
simplifies #99798 because we now don't have to expand `ty::UnevaluatedConst` to `ty::Const`.
I also remember some other places where using `ty::UnevaluatedConst` directly was annoying and caused issues, though I don't quite remember what they were rn '^^
r? `@oli-obk` cc `@JulianKnodt`
Workaround the python vscode extension's polyfill
Fixes#13442
`String.replaceAll` and `String.replace` behave the same when given a (/g-flagged) Regex, so fix is very simple.
linker: Fix weak lang item linking with combination windows-gnu + LLD + LTO
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100404 this logic was originally disabled for MSVC due to issues with LTO, but the same issues appear on windows-gnu with LLD because that LLD uses the same underlying logic as MSVC LLD, just with re-syntaxed command line options.
So this PR just disables it for LTO builds in general.
feat: add multiple getters mode in `generate_getter`
This commit adds two modes to generate_getter action.
First, the plain old working on single fields.
Second, working on a selected range of fields.
Should partially solve #13246
If this gets approved will create a separate PR for setters version of the same
### Points to help in review:
- `generate_getter_from_record_info` contains code which is mostly taken from assist before refactor
- Same goes for `parse_record_fields`
- There are changes in other assists, as one of the methods in utils named `find_struct_impl` is changed, before it used to accept a single `fn_name`, now it takes a list of function names to check against. All old impls are updated to create a small list to pass their single element.
### Assumptions:
- If any of the fields have an implementation, the action will quit.
Fix the bug of next_point in source_map
There is a bug in `next_point`, the new span won't move to next position when be called in the first time.
For this reason, our current code is working like this:
1. When we really want to move to the next position, we called two times of `next_point`
2. Some code which use `next_point` actually done the same thing with `shrink_to_hi`
This fix make sure when `next_point` is called, span will move with the width at least 1, and also work correctly in the scenario of multiple bytes.
Ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103140#discussion_r997710998
r? `@davidtwco`
fix: Don't catch the server activation error
We are are rethrowing and showing errors higher up in the call stack already. This just ate the error hiding the stacktrace unnecessarily.
Implement invocation strategy config
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/10793
This allows to change how we run build scripts (and `checkOnSave`), exposing two configs:
- `once`: run the specified command once in the project root (the working dir of the server)
- `per_workspace`: run the specified command per workspace in the corresponding workspace
This also applies to `checkOnSave` likewise, though `once_in_root` is useless there currently, due to https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/11007