Set `CFG_OMIT_GIT_HASH=1` during builds when `omit-git-hash` is enabled
This environment variable will allow tools like Cargo to disable their own detection when `omit-git-hash` is set to `true`.
I created this PR because of https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/12968. There is not a dependency between the two PRs, they can land in any order. They just won't do anything until both of them are merged into the repo.
deprecate `if-available` value of `download-ci-llvm`
This PR deprecates the use of the `if-available` value for `download-ci-llvm` since `if-unchanged` serves the same purpose when no changes are detected. In cases where changes are present, it is assumed that compiling LLVM is acceptable (otherwise, why make changes there?).
This was probably missing in the #110087 issue before.
cc `@RalfJung`
Remove option_payload_ptr; redundant to offset_of
The `option_payload_ptr` intrinsic is no longer required as `offset_of` supports traversing enums (#114208). This PR removes it in order to dogfood offset_of (as suggested at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106655#issuecomment-1790907626). However, it will not build until those changes reach beta (which I think is within the next 8 days?) so I've opened it as a draft.
Expose tests for {f32,f64}.total_cmp in docs
Expose tests for {f32,f64}.total_cmp in docs
Uncomment the helpful `assert_eq!` line, which is stripped out completely in docs, and leaves the reader to mentally play through the algorithm, or go to the playground and add a println!, to see what the result will be.
(If these tests are known to fail on some platforms, is there some mechanism to conditionalize this or escape the test so the `assert_eq!` source will be visible on the web? I am a newbie, which is why I was reading docs ;)
Reenable effects in libcore
With #116670, #117531, and #117171, I think we would be comfortable with re-enabling the effects feature for more testing in libcore.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@fmease`
cc #110395
Add some additional warnings for duplicated diagnostic items
This commit adds warnings if a user supplies several diagnostic options where we can only apply one of them. We explicitly warn about ignored options here. In addition a small test for these warnings is added.
r? `@compiler-errors`
For now that's the last PR to improve the warnings generated by misused `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attributes. I'm not sure what needs to be done next to move this closer to stabilization.
Add T: ?Sized to `RwLockReadGuard` and `RwLockWriteGuard`'s Debug impls.
For context, `MutexGuard` has `+ ?Sized` on its `Debug` impl, and all three have `+ ?Sized` on their `Display` impls.
It looks like the `?Sized` was just missed when the impls were added (the impl for `MutexGuard` was added in the same PR (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/38006) with support for `T: Debug + ?Sized`, and `RwLock*Guard`s did allow `T: ?Sized` types already); the `Display` impls were added later (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/42822) with support for `T: Debug + ?Sized` types.
I think this needs a T-libs-api FCP? I'm not sure if this also needs an ACP. If so I can make one.
These are changes to (stable) trait impls on stable types so will be insta-stable.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api
More detail when expecting expression but encountering bad macro argument
On nested macro invocations where the same macro fragment changes fragment type from one to the next, point at the chain of invocations and at the macro fragment definition place, explaining that the change has occurred.
Fix#71039.
```
error: expected expression, found pattern `1 + 1`
--> $DIR/trace_faulty_macros.rs:49:37
|
LL | (let $p:pat = $e:expr) => {test!(($p,$e))};
| ------- -- this is interpreted as expression, but it is expected to be pattern
| |
| this macro fragment matcher is expression
...
LL | (($p:pat, $e:pat)) => {let $p = $e;};
| ------ ^^ expected expression
| |
| this macro fragment matcher is pattern
...
LL | test!(let x = 1+1);
| ------------------
| | |
| | this is expected to be expression
| in this macro invocation
|
= note: when forwarding a matched fragment to another macro-by-example, matchers in the second macro will see an opaque AST of the fragment type, not the underlying tokens
= note: this error originates in the macro `test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
feat: implement `DoubleEndedSearcher` for `CharArray[Ref]Searcher`
This PR implements `DoubleEndedSearcher` for both `CharArraySearcher` and `CharArrayRefSearcher`. I'm not sure whether this was just overlooked or if there is a reason for it, but since it behaves exactly like `CharSliceSearcher`, I think the implementations should be appropriate.
ignore implied bounds with placeholders
given the following code:
```rust
trait Trait {
type Ty<'a> where Self: 'a;
}
impl<T> Trait for T {
type Ty<'a> = () where Self: 'a;
}
struct Foo<T: Trait>(T)
where
for<'x> T::Ty<'x>: Sized;
```
when computing the implied bounds from `Foo<X>` we incorrectly get the bound `X: !x` from the normalization of ` for<'x> <X as Trait>::Ty::<'x>: Sized`. This is a a known bug! we shouldn't use the constraints that arise from normalization as implied bounds. See #109628.
Ignore these bounds for now. This should prevent later ICEs.
Fixes#112250Fixes#107409
new solver normalization improvements
cool beans
At the core of this PR is a `try_normalize_ty` which stops for rigid aliases by using `commit_if_ok`.
Reworks alias-relate to fully normalize both the lhs and rhs and then equate the resulting rigid (or inference) types. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/68 by avoiding the exponential blowup. Also supersedes #116369 by only defining opaque types if the hidden type is rigid.
I removed the stability check in `EvalCtxt::evaluate_goal` due to https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/75. While I personally have opinions on how to fix it, that still requires further t-types/`@nikomatsakis` buy-in, so I removed that for now. Once we've decided on our approach there, we can revert this commit.
r? `@compiler-errors`
document ABI compatibility
I don't think we have any central place where we document our ABI compatibility rules, so let's create one. The `fn()` pointer type seems like a good place since ABI questions can only become relevant when invoking a function through a function pointer.
This will likely need T-lang FCP.
code: expose workspaces to other extensions; remove `addProject` command
This (mostly red) PR does three things:
- Exposes two methods to companion extensions (`setWorkspaces` and `notifyRustAnalyzer`).
- `setWorkspaces` is needed to update `linkedProjects` _without_ writing workspace/global configuration.
- `notifyRustAnalyzer` to get the server to pull the new configuration.
- Makes `Ctx` implement `RustAnalyzerExtensionApi` to prevent accidental regressions.
- Remove `rust-analyzer.addProject`, as that will live in a buck2 companion extension. No need for that to be in rust-analyzer!
I can see the utility of combining `notifyRustAnalyzer` and `setWorkspaces` into a single method (`updateWorkspacesAndNotify()`?), but I don't feel strongly about this. My feeling is that this API could be easily changed in the future.
Ensure strings created with `const_str` get the `unnamed_addr` attribute
This function (`const_str`) is only used when we need to invent a string during codegen -- for example, for a panic message to pass when codegening some of the assert/panic/etc terminators (for stuff like divide by zero).
AFAICT all other consts, such as the user-defined ones from const eval, should already be getting this attribute (things that come from a ConstAllocation do, for example). Which means that the "unnamed" part is even more true than usual here, these aren't strings that even exist as far as the user can tell.
~~Setting this attribute allows LLVM to merge these constants, leading to significant binary size savings (much more than I would expect). On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, t takes a build of ripgrep (release without debug info) from 9.7MiB to 6.0MiB (a savings of over 30%!?), and a build of rustc_driver's shared object from 123MiB to 112MiB (less drastic, but still over 10% reduced).~~
~~The effect on ripgrep is substantially reduced on macOS for reasons beyond me (I may have fucked up the test), only saving around 0.2MiB, although rustc_driver is still around 10MB or smaller than it had been previously.~~
~~This raises some questions, such as "does that mean 1/3 of ripgrep was made of division by zero complaints?" I'm not sure, that may be the case. The output of `strings path/to/rg` is \~2MB smaller, so it seems like a lot of it was. Allowing these to be merged presumably also allow functions that contain them to be merged (if the addresses had semantic meaning, then it stands).~~
~~I intend to do some more analysis here, but I got this up as soon as I realized that this attribute was only missing for internal const strings, and all other ones already get it.~~
Edit: The wins are much more marginal, but there's some argument to do this for the sake of consistency.
Fix depth check in ProofTreeVisitor.
The hack to cutoff overflows and cycles in the new trait solver was incorrect. We want to inspect everything with depth [0..10].
This fix exposed a previously unseen bug, which caused the compiler to ICE when invoking `trait_ref` on a non-assoc type projection. I simply added the guard in the `AmbiguityCausesVisitor`, and updated the expected output for the `auto-trait-coherence` test which now includes the extra note:
```text
|
= note: upstream crates may add a new impl of trait `std::marker::Send` for type `OpaqueType` in future versions
```
r? `@lcnr`
Add -Z llvm_module_flag
Allow adding values to the `!llvm.module.flags` metadata for a generated module. The syntax is
`-Z llvm_module_flag=<name>:<type>:<value>:<behavior>`
Currently only u32 values are supported but the type is required to be specified for forward compatibility. The `behavior` element must match one of the named LLVM metadata behaviors.viors.
This flag is expected to be perma-unstable.
finish `RegionKind` renaming
second step of https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/95
continues the work from #117876. While working on this and I encountered a bunch of further cleanup which I'll either open a tracking issue for or will do in a separate PR:
- rewrite the `RegionKind` docs, they still talk about `ReEmpty` and are generally out of date
- rename `DescriptionCtx` to `DescriptionCtxt`
- what is `CheckRegions::Bound`?
- `collect_late_bound_regions` et al
- `erase_late_bound_regions` -> `instantiate_bound_regions_with_erased`?
- `EraseEarlyRegions` visitor should be removed, feels duplicate
r? `@BoxyUwU`
