This also results in a more readable Cargo.toml as the locations of the
things are more obvious now.
Includes rewording of the underline-color feature.
Logs of the errors: https://docs.rs/crate/ratatui/0.26.3/builds/1224962
Also see #989
Simplify the List example by removing lifetimes not strictly necessary
to demonstrate how Ratatui lists work. Instead, the sample strings are
copied into each `TodoItem`. To further simplify, I changed the code to
use a new TodoItem::new function, rather than an implementation of the
`From` trait.
`List::start_corner` was deprecated in v0.25. Use `List::direction` and
`ListDirection` instead.
```diff
- list.start_corner(Corner::TopLeft);
- list.start_corner(Corner::TopRight);
// This is not an error, BottomRight rendered top to bottom previously
- list.start_corner(Corner::BottomRight);
// all becomes
+ list.direction(ListDirection::TopToBottom);
```
```diff
- list.start_corner(Corner::BottomLeft);
// becomes
+ list.direction(ListDirection::BottomToTop);
```
`layout::Corner` is removed entirely.
Co-authored-by: Josh McKinney <joshka@users.noreply.github.com>
Codegen units are optimized on their own. Per default bench / release
have 16 codegen units. What ends up in a codeget unit is rather random
and can influence a benchmark result as a code change can move stuff
into a different codegen unit → prevent / allow LLVM optimizations
unrelated to the actual change.
More details: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/profiles.html
Using reset is clearer to me what actually happens. On the other case a
struct is created to override the old one completely which basically
does the same in a less clear way.
It is sometimes useful to obtain access to the writer if we want to see
what has been written so far. For example, when using &mut [u8] as a
writer.
Co-authored-by: Josh McKinney <joshka@users.noreply.github.com>
We need to make sure to not change existing methods without a notice.
But at the same time this also finds public additions with mistakes
before they are even released which is what I would like to have.
This renames a method and deprecated the old name hinting to a new name.
Should this be mentioned somewhere, so it's added to the release notes?
It's not breaking because the old method is still there.
- Simplify `assert_buffer_eq!` logic.
- Deprecate `assert_buffer_eq!`.
- Introduce `TestBackend::assert_buffer_lines`.
Also simplify many tests involving buffer comparisons.
For the deprecation, just use `assert_eq` instead of `assert_buffer_eq`:
```diff
-assert_buffer_eq!(actual, expected);
+assert_eq!(actual, expected);
```
---
I noticed `assert_buffer_eq!` creating no test coverage reports and
looked into this macro. First I simplified it. Then I noticed a bunch of
`assert_eq!(buffer, …)` and other indirect usages of this macro (like
`TestBackend::assert_buffer`).
The good thing here is that it's mainly used in tests so not many
changes to the library code.
- Rewrote the line / span rendering code to take into account how
multi-byte / wide emoji characters are truncated when rendering into
areas that cannot accommodate them in the available space
- Added comprehensive coverage over the edge cases
- Adds a benchmark to ensure perf
Fixes: https://github.com/ratatui-org/ratatui/issues/1032
Co-authored-by: EdJoPaTo <rfc-conform-git-commit-email@funny-long-domain-label-everyone-hates-as-it-is-too-long.edjopato.de>
Co-authored-by: EdJoPaTo <github@edjopato.de>
`Block::bordered()` is shorter than
`Block::new().borders(Borders::ALL)`, requires one less import
(`Borders`) and in case `Block::default()` was used before can even be
`const`.
