This PR just tidies up some tests by removing unused code:
1. If the filesystem is not touched, don't use the filesystem
playground/sandbox
2. If the filesystem is not touched, don't specify the `cwd`
3. If the command is short, don't bother wrapping it in `pipeline()`
4. If the command doesn't have quotes, don't bother with a `r#"..."#`
raw string
Part of #8670.
# Description
Extends the `extern` syntax to allow commands that accept raw arguments.
This is mainly added to allow wrapper type scripts for external
commands.
This is an example on how this can be used:
```nushell
extern foo [...rest] {
print ($rest | str join ',' )
}
foo --bar baz -- -q -u -x
# => --bar,baz,--,-q,-u,-x
```
(It's only possible to accept a single ...varargs argument in the
signature)
# User-Facing Changes
No breaking changes, just extra possibilities.
# Tests + Formatting
Added a test for this new behaviour and ran the toolkit pr checker
# After Submitting
This is advanced functionality but it should be documented, I will open
a new PR on the book for that
Co-authored-by: Jelle Besseling <jelle@bigbridge.nl>
# Description
Previously, `par-each` acted like a `flatmap`: first mapping the data,
then applying a `flatten`. This is unlike `each`, which just maps the
data. Now `par-each` works like `each` in this regard, leaving nested
data unflattened.
Fixes#8497
# User-Facing Changes
Previously:
`[1 2 3] | par-each {|e| [$e, $e] }` --> `[1,1,2,2,3,3]`
Now:
`[1 2 3] | par-each {|e| [$e, $e] }` --> `[[1,1],[2,2],[3,3]]`
# Tests
This adds one test that verifies the lack of flattening for `par-each`.
close? #8060
Quite a bit of refactoring took place.
I believe a few improvements to collapse/expand were made.
I've tried to track any performance regressions and seems like it is
fine.
I've noticed something different now with default configuration path or
something in this regard?
So I might missed something while testing because of this.
Requires some oversight.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
# Description
this pr condenses `MutBuiltinVar`, `LetBuiltinVar` and `ConstBuiltinVar`
into one error:
```nu
Error: nu::parser::name_is_builtin_var
× `in` used as variable name.
╭─[entry #69:1:1]
1 │ let in = 420
· ─┬
· ╰── already a builtin variable
╰────
help: 'in' is the name of a builtin Nushell variable and cannot be used
as a variable name
```
it also fixes this case which was previously not handled
```nu
let $nu = 420 # this variable would have been 'lost'
```
# Description
This effectively reverts #8635. We shipped this change with 0.78 and
received many comments/issues related to this restriction feeling like a
step backward.
fixes: #8844
(and probably other issues)
# User-Facing Changes
Returns numbers and number-like values to being allowed to be bare
words. Examples: `3*`, `1fb43`, `4,5`, and related.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Verified on discord with maintainer
Change adds regex separators in split rows/column/list. The primary
motivating reason was to make it easier to split on separators with
unbounded whitespace without requiring a lot of trim jiggery. But,
secondary motivation is the same as the set of all motivations for
adding split regex features to most languages.
# User-Facing Changes
Adds -r option to split rows/column/list.
# Tests + Formatting
Ran tests, however tests.nu fails with unrelated errors:
```
~/src/nushell> cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu 04/02/2023 02:07:25 AM
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.24s
Running `target/debug/nu crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu`
INF|2023-04-02T02:07:27.060|Running tests in test_asserts
INF|2023-04-02T02:07:27.141|Running tests in test_dirs
Error:
× list is just pwd after initialization
INF|2023-04-02T02:07:27.167|Running tests in test_logger
INF|2023-04-02T02:07:27.286|Running tests in test_std
Error:
× some tests did not pass (see complete errors above):
│
│ test_asserts test_assert
│ test_asserts test_assert_equal
│ test_asserts test_assert_error
│ test_asserts test_assert_greater
│ test_asserts test_assert_greater_or_equal
│ test_asserts test_assert_length
│ test_asserts test_assert_less
│ test_asserts test_assert_less_or_equal
│ test_asserts test_assert_not_equal
│ ⨯ test_dirs test_dirs_command
│ test_logger test_critical
│ test_logger test_debug
│ test_logger test_error
│ test_logger test_info
│ test_logger test_warning
│ test_std test_path_add
│
```
Upon investigating seeing this difference:
```
╭───┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ 0 │ /var/folders/1f/ltbr1m8s5s1811k6n1rhpc0r0000gn/T/test_dirs_c1ed89d6-19f7-47c7-9e1f-74c39f3623b5 │
│ 1 │ /private/var/folders/1f/ltbr1m8s5s1811k6n1rhpc0r0000gn/T/test_dirs_c1ed89d6-19f7-47c7-9e1f-74c39f3623b5 │
╰───┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
```
This seems unrelated to my changes, but can investigate further if
desired.
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Robert Waugh <robert@waugh.io>
# Description
This PR aims to cover the tests under nu-command as part of this issue
#8670 to clean up any unnecessary wrapping funcs like `cwd(".")` or
`pipeline()`, etc.
This PR is still WIP and opening as draft to get first impressions and
feedback on a few tests before I go on changing more.
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
None
# After Submitting
None
---------
Signed-off-by: Harshal Chaudhari <harshal.chaudhary@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
# Description
Prevents redefining fields in a record, for example `{a: 1, a: 2}` would
now error.
fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8699
# User-Facing Changes
Is technically a breaking change. If you relied on this behaviour to
give you the last value, your code will now error.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This PR makes `?` work with `reject`. For example:
```bash
> {} | reject foo
Error: nu:🐚:column_not_found
× Cannot find column
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ {} | reject foo
· ───┬── ─┬─
· │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo'
· ╰── value originates here
╰────
> {} | reject foo?
╭──────────────╮
│ empty record │
╰──────────────╯
```
This was prompted by [a user
question](https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/614593951969574961/1091466428546306078).
I would like to get this in for 0.78, I think it's low-risk and I want
the `?` feature to be as polished as possible for its debut.
# Description
Adds two more patterns when working with lists:
```
[1, ..$remainder]
```
and
```
[1, ..]
```
The first one collects the remaining items and assigns them into the
variable. The second one ignores any remaining values.
# User-Facing Changes
Adds more capability to list pattern matching.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Currently, all four of these commands return a (rather-confusing)
spanless error when passed an empty list:
```
> [] | sort
Error:
× no values to work with
help: no values to work with
```
This PR changes these commands to always output `[]` if the input is
`[]`.
```
> [] | sort
╭────────────╮
│ empty list │
╰────────────╯
> [] | uniq-by foo
╭────────────╮
│ empty list │
╰────────────╯
```
I'm not sure what the original logic was here, but in the case of `sort`
and `uniq`, I think the current behavior is straightforwardly wrong.
`sort-by` and `uniq-by` are a bit more complicated, since they currently
try to perform some validation that the specified column name is present
in the input (see #8667 for problems with this validation, where a
possible outcome is removing the validation entirely). When passed `[]`,
it's not possible to do any validation because there are no records.
This opens up the possibility for situations like the following:
```
> [[foo]; [5] [6]] | where foo < 3 | sort-by bar
╭────────────╮
│ empty list │
╰────────────╯
```
I think there's a strong argument that `[]` is the best output for these
commands as well, since it makes pipelines like `$table | filter
$condition | sort-by $column` more predictable. Currently, this pipeline
will throw an error if `filter` evaluates to `[]`, but work fine
otherwise. This makes it difficult to write reliable code, especially
since users are not likely to encounter the `filter -> []` case in
testing (issue #5957). The only workaround is to insert manual checks
for an empty result. IMO, this is significantly worse than the "you can
typo a column name without getting an error" problem shown above.
Other commands that take column arguments (`get`, `select`, `rename`,
etc) already have `[] -> []`, so there's existing precedent for this
behavior.
The core question here is "what columns does `[]` have"? The current
behavior of `sort-by` is "no columns", while the current behavior of
`select` is "all possible columns". Both answers lead to accepting some
likely-buggy code without throwing on error, but in order to do better
here we would need something like `Value::Table` that tracks columns on
empty tables.
If other people disagree with this logic, I'm happy to split out the
`sort-by` and `uniq-by` changes into another PR.
# User-Facing Changes
`sort`, `uniq`, `sort-by`, and `uniq-by` now return `[]` instead of
throwing an error when input is `[]`.
# After Submitting
> If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
The existing behavior was not documented, and the new behavior is what
you would expect by default, so I don't think we need to update
documentation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
This PR fixes a bug introduced in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8571.
We were accidentally converting a `Result<Value, ShellError>` to JSON
instead of converting a `Value`. The upshot was that we were sending
JSON like `{"Ok":{"foo":"bar"}}` instead of `{"foo":"bar"}`.
This was an easy bug to miss, because `ureq::send_json()` accepts any
`impl serde::Serialize`. I've added a test to prevent regression.
# Description
This removes all the old style of quasi-ranges before we had full range
support from `str substring`. Functionality should otherwise work, but
only with the official range syntax.
# User-Facing Changes
Removes the array and string forms of ranges from `str substring`.
Leaves only the official range support for range values.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This PR fixes `select` when given an empty list; it used to return
`null` when given an empty list. I also cleaned up other `select` tests
while I was in the area.
### Before:
```
> [] | select a | to nuon
null
```
### After:
```
> [] | select a | to nuon
[]
```
It looks like the previous behaviour was accidentally introduced by
[this PR](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7639).
# Description
Require that any value that looks like it might be a number (starts with
a digit, or a '-' + digit, or a '+' + digits, or a special form float
like `-inf`, `inf`, or `NaN`) must now be treated as a number-like
value. Number-like syntax can only parse into number-like values.
Number-like values include: durations, ints, floats, ranges, filesizes,
binary data, etc.
# User-Facing Changes
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
Just making sure we see this for release notes 😅
This breaks any and all numberlike values that were treated as strings
before. Example, we used to allow `3,` as a bare word. Anything like
this would now require quotes or backticks to be treated as a string or
bare word, respectively.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Adds `|` patterns to `match`, allowing you to try multiple patterns for
the same case.
Example:
```
match {b: 1} { {a: $b} | {b: $b} => { print $b } }
```
Variables that don't bind are set to `$nothing` so that they can be
later checked.
This PR also:
fixes#8631
Creates a set of integration tests for pattern matching also
# User-Facing Changes
Adds `|` to `match`. Fixes variable binding scope.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #8542
# User-Facing Changes
## Previous
```
❯ cat `~/TE ST/bug`
cat: ~/TE ST/bug: No such file or directory
```
## After
```
❯ cat `~/TE ST/bug`
a
```
This should be ok because We treat back-quoted strings as bare words
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This removes autoprinting the final value of a loop, much in the same
spirit as not autoprinting values at the end of statements. As we fix
these corner cases, it becomes more consistent that to print to the
screen in a script, you use the `print` command.
This gives a noticeable performance improvement as a bonus.
Before:
```
C:\Source\nushell〉 for x in 1..10 { $x }
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
```
Now:
```
C:\Source\nushell〉 for x in 1..10 { $x }
C:\Source\nushell〉
```
# User-Facing Changes
**BREAKING CHANGE**
Loops like `for`, `loop`, and `while` will no longer automatically print
loop values to the screen.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Prior to this PR, the less/greater than operators (`<`, `>`, `<=`, `>=`)
would throw an error if either side was null. After this PR, these
operators return null if either side (or both) is null.
### Examples
```bash
1 < 3 # true
1 < null # null
null < 3 # null
null < null # null
```
### Motivation
JT [asked the C#
folks](https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/615329862395101194/1086137515053957140)
and this is apparently the approach they would choose for comparison
operators if they could start from scratch.
This PR makes `where` more convenient to use on jagged/missing data. For
example, we can now filter on columns that may not be present in every
row:
```
> [{foo: 123} {}] | where foo? > 10
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ foo │
├───┼─────┤
│ 0 │ 123 │
╰───┴─────╯
```
this pr refines #8270 and closes#8109
# description
examples:
the original syntax is okay
```nu
def okay [nums: list] {} # the type of list will be list<any>
```
empty annotations are allowed in any variation
the last two may be caught by a future formatter,
but do not affect `nu` code currently
```nu
def okay [nums: list<>] {} # okay
def okay [nums: list< >] {} # weird but also okay
def okay [nums: list<
>] {} # also weird but okay
```
types are allowed (See [notes](#notes) below)
```nu
def okay [nums: list<int>] {} # `test [a b c]` will throw an error
def okay [nums: list< int > {} # any amount of space within the angle brackets is okay
def err [nums: list <int>] {} # this is not okay, `nums` and `<int>` will be parsed as
# two separate params,
```
nested annotations are allowed in many variations
```nu
def okay [items: list<list<int>>] {}
def okay [items: list<list>] {}
```
any unterminated annotation is caught
```nu
Error: nu::parser::unexpected_eof
× Unexpected end of code.
╭─[source:1:1]
1 │ def err [nums: list<int] {}
· ▲
· ╰── expected closing >
╰────
```
unknown types are flagged
```nu
Error: nu::parser::unknown_type
× Unknown type.
╭─[source:1:1]
1 │ def err [nums: list<str>] {}
· ─┬─
· ╰── unknown type
╰────
Error: nu::parser::unknown_type
× Unknown type.
╭─[source:1:1]
1 │ def err [nums: list<int, string>] {}
· ─────┬─────
· ╰── unknown type
╰────
```
# notes
the error message for mismatched types in not as intuitive
```nu
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch
× Parse mismatch during operation.
╭─[source:1:1]
1 │ def err [nums: list<int>] {}; err [a b c]
· ┬
· ╰── expected int
╰────
```
it should be something like this
```nu
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch
× Parse mismatch during operation.
╭─[source:1:1]
1 │ def err [nums: list<int>] {}; err [a b c]
· ──┬──
· ╰── expected list<int>
╰────
```
this is currently not implemented
# Description
This is an experiment to see what switching the `let/let-env` family to
math expressions for initialisers would be like.
# User-Facing Changes
This would require any commands you call from `let x = <command here>`
(and similar family) to call the command in parentheses. `let x = (foo)`
to call `foo`.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This adds two different features to `open`:
* The ability to pass more than one file to `open`.
* Support for using globs in the filenames
`open` will create a list stream and stream the output if there is more
than one file opened
Examples:
```
open file1.csv file2.csv file3.csv
```
```
open *.nu | where $it =~ "echo"
```
# User-Facing Changes
Multi-file and glob support in `open`. Original `open` functionality
should continue as before.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
As title, closes: #7921closes: #8273
# User-Facing Changes
when define a closure without pipe, nushell will raise error for now:
```
❯ let x = {ss ss}
Error: nu::parser::closure_missing_pipe
× Missing || inside closure
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ let x = {ss ss}
· ───┬───
· ╰── Parsing as a closure, but || is missing
╰────
help: Try add || to the beginning of closure
```
`any`, `each`, `all`, `where` command accepts closure, it forces user
input closure like `{||`, or parse error will returned.
```
❯ {major:2, minor:1, patch:4} | values | each { into string }
Error: nu::parser::closure_missing_pipe
× Missing || inside closure
╭─[entry #4:1:1]
1 │ {major:2, minor:1, patch:4} | values | each { into string }
· ───────┬───────
· ╰── Parsing as a closure, but || is missing
╰────
help: Try add || to the beginning of closure
```
`with-env`, `do`, `def`, `try` are special, they still remain the same,
although it says that it accepts a closure, but they don't need to be
written like `{||`, it's more likely a block but can capture variable
outside of scope:
```
❯ def test [input] { echo [0 1 2] | do { do { echo $input } } }; test aaa
aaa
```
Just realize that It's a big breaking change, we need to update config
and scripts...
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This PR adds a command `join` for performing SQL-style joins on Nushell
tables:
```
〉join -h
Join two tables
Usage:
> join {flags} <right-table> <left-on> (right-on)
Flags:
-h, --help - Display the help message for this command
-i, --inner - Inner join (default)
-l, --left - Left-outer join
-r, --right - Right-outer join
-o, --outer - Outer join
Signatures:
<table> | join list<any>, <string>, <string?> -> <table>
Parameters:
right-table <list<any>>: The right table in the join
left-on <string>: Name of column in input (left) table to join on
(optional) right-on <string>: Name of column in right table to join on. Defaults to same column as left table.
Examples:
Join two tables
> [{a: 1 b: 2}] | join [{a: 1 c: 3}] a
╭───┬───┬───╮
│ a │ b │ c │
├───┼───┼───┤
│ 1 │ 2 │ 3 │
╰───┴───┴───╯
```
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img width="400" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52205/224578744-eb9d133e-2510-4a3d-bd0a-d615f07a06b7.png"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
# User-Facing Changes
Adds a new command `join`
# Tests + Formatting
```
cargo test -p nu-command commands::join
```
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
- [ ] If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
# Description
This adds back support for parens around params, eg `def foo (x: int) {
... }`
# User-Facing Changes
returns to the original support before the recent parser refactor
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8379 removed the `-i` flag from
`get` and `select` because the new `?` functionality covers most of the
same use cases. However, https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8480
made me realize that `-i` is still useful when dealing with cell paths
in variables.
This PR re-adds the `-i` flag to `get` and `select`. It works by just
marking every member in the cell path as optional, which will behave
_slightly_ differently than `-i` used to (previously it would suppress
any errors, even type errors) but IMO that's OK.
This reverts commit dec0a2517f.
It breaks programs like `fzf`
# Description
Fixes: #8472
Fixes: #8313Reopen: #7690
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #8402#8391
The cause of these issue if when we want to evaluate a expression with
`Value::Error`, nushell show error immediately. To fix the issue, we can
wrap the `Value::Error` into a `Value::Record`. So user can see the
message he want.
# User-Facing Changes
Before
```
❯ try { 1 / 0 } catch {|e| echo $"error is ($e)"}
Error: nu:🐚:division_by_zero
× Division by zero.
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ try { 1 / 0 } catch {|e| echo $"error is ($e)"}
· ┬
· ╰── division by zero
╰────
```
After
```
❯ try { 1 / 0 } catch {|e| echo $"error is ($e)"}
error is {msg: Division by zero., debug: DivisionByZero { span: Span { start: 43104, end: 43105 } }, raw: DivisionByZero { sp
an: Span { start: 43104, end: 43105 } }}
```
As we can see, error becomes a record with `msg`, `debug`, `raw`
columns.
1. msg column is a user friendly message.
2. debug column is more about `Value::Error` information as a string.
3. raw column is a `Value::Error` itself, if user want to re-raise the
error, just use `$e | get raw`
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540.
Please provide feedback if you have the time!
## Summary
This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is
optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be
accessed.
Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path
members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and
`bar` is not.
`?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations
where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is
missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a
date) will still fail.
### Record Examples
```bash
{ foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123
{ foo: 123 }.bar # errors
{ foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null
{ foo: 123 } | get bar # errors
{ foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null
{ foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors
{ foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?`
{ foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors
{ foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null
```
### List Examples
```
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo
Error: nu:🐚:column_not_found
× Cannot find column
╭─[entry #30:1:1]
1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo
· ─┬ ─┬─
· │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo'
· ╰── value originates here
╰────
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?
╭───┬───╮
│ 0 │ 1 │
│ 1 │ 2 │
│ 2 │ │
╰───┴───╯
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe
nothing
〉[a b c].4? | describe
nothing
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ foo │
├───┼─────┤
│ 0 │ 1 │
╰───┴─────╯
```
# Breaking changes
1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted.
2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and
`select`
1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or
`try`/`catch`.
4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`:
```bash
〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0
2
```
We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only
want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed
that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be
written like:
```bash
〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0
2
```
I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in
the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that
happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
# Description
This fixes up some clippy warnings and removes some old names/info from
our unit tests
# User-Facing Changes
Internal changes only
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
The correction made here concerns the issue #8431. Indeed, the algorithm
initially proposed to remove elements of a `vector` performed a loop
with `remove` and an incident therefore appeared when several values
were equal because the deletion was done outside the length of the
vector:
```rust
let mut found = false;
for (i, col) in cols.clone().iter().enumerate() {
if col == col_name {
cols.remove(i);
vals.remove(i);
found = true;
}
}
```
Then, `[[a, a]; [1, 2]] | reject a: ` gave `thread 'main' panicked at
'removal index (is 1) should be < len (is 1)',
crates/nu-protocol/src/value/mod.rs:1213:54`.
The proposed correction is therefore the implementation of the
`retain_mut` utility dedicated to this functionality.
```rust
let mut found = false;
let mut index = 0;
cols.retain_mut(|col| {
if col == col_name {
found = true;
vals.remove(index);
false
} else {
index += 1;
true
}
});
```
# Description
Prevents alias from aliasing itself. It allows a commonly requested
pattern similar to `alias ls = ls -l`.
One small issue is that the syntax highlighting is a bit off:
Fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8246
# User-Facing Changes
Shouldn't be a breaking change.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Changes old `from xml` `to xml` data formats. See #7682 for reasoning
behind this change.
Output is now a series of records with `tag`, `attributes` and `content`
fields.
Old:
New:
# User-Facing Changes
New output/input format, better error handling for `from xml` and `to
xml` commands.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fix for data ambiguity noted in #8244.
Basic change is to use nanosecond resolution for unix timestamps (stored
in type Int). Previously, a timestamp might have seconds, milliseconds
or nanoseconds, but it turned out there were overlaps in data ranges
between different resolutions, so there wasn't always a unique mapping
back to date/time.
Due to higher precision, the *range* of dates that timestamps can map to
is restricted. Unix timestamps with seconds resolution and 64 bit
storage can cover all dates from the Big Bang to eternity. Timestamps
with seconds resolution and 32 bit storage can only represent dates from
1901-12-13 through 2038-01-19. The nanoseconds resolution and 64 bit
storage used with this fix can represent dates from 1677-09-21T00:12:44
to 2262-04-11T23:47:16, something of a compromise.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
## `<datetime> | into int`
Converts to nanosecond resolution
```rust
〉date now | into int
1678084730502126846
```
This is the number of non-leap nanoseconds after the unix epoch date:
1970-01-01T00:00:00+00:00.
Conversion fails for dates outside the supported range:
```rust
〉1492-10-12 | into int
Error: nu:🐚:incorrect_value
× Incorrect value.
╭─[entry #51:1:1]
1 │ 1492-10-12 | into int
· ────┬───
· ╰── DateTime out of timestamp range 1677-09-21T00:12:43 and 2262-04-11T23:47:16
╰────
```
## `<int> | into datetime`
Can no longer fail or produce incorrect results for any 64-bit input:
```rust
〉0 | into datetime
Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 (53 years ago)
〉"7fffffffffffffff" | into int -r 16 | into datetime
Fri, 11 Apr 2262 23:47:16 +0000 (in 239 years)
〉("7fffffffffffffff" | into int -r 16) * -1 | into datetime
Tue, 21 Sep 1677 00:12:43 +0000 (345 years ago)
```
## `<date> | date to-record` and `<date> | date to-table`
Now both have a `nanosecond` field.
```rust
〉"7fffffffffffffff" | into int -r 16 | into datetime | date to-record
╭────────────┬───────────╮
│ year │ 2262 │
│ month │ 4 │
│ day │ 11 │
│ hour │ 23 │
│ minute │ 47 │
│ second │ 16 │
│ nanosecond │ 854775807 │
│ timezone │ +00:00 │
╰────────────┴───────────╯
〉"7fffffffffffffff" | into int -r 16 | into datetime | date to-table
╭───┬──────┬───────┬─────┬──────┬────────┬────────┬────────────┬──────────╮
│ # │ year │ month │ day │ hour │ minute │ second │ nanosecond │ timezone │
├───┼──────┼───────┼─────┼──────┼────────┼────────┼────────────┼──────────┤
│ 0 │ 2262 │ 4 │ 11 │ 23 │ 47 │ 16 │ 854775807 │ +00:00 │
╰───┴──────┴───────┴─────┴──────┴────────┴────────┴────────────┴──────────╯
```
This change was not mandated by the OP problem, but it is nice to be
able to see the nanosecond bits that were present in Nushell `date` type
all along.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
