nushell/crates/nu-command/src/math/avg.rs

75 lines
2 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use crate::math::reducers::{reducer_for, Reduce};
use crate::math::utils::run_with_function;
use nu_protocol::ast::Call;
use nu_protocol::engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack};
use nu_protocol::{Category, Example, PipelineData, ShellError, Signature, Span, Type, Value};
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct SubCommand;
impl Command for SubCommand {
fn name(&self) -> &str {
"math avg"
}
fn signature(&self) -> Signature {
Signature::build("math avg")
.input_output_types(vec![(Type::List(Box::new(Type::Number)), Type::Number)])
.category(Category::Math)
}
fn usage(&self) -> &str {
"Returns the average of a list of numbers"
}
fn search_terms(&self) -> Vec<&str> {
vec!["average", "mean", "statistics"]
}
fn run(
&self,
_engine_state: &EngineState,
_stack: &mut Stack,
call: &Call,
input: PipelineData,
) -> Result<nu_protocol::PipelineData, nu_protocol::ShellError> {
run_with_function(call, input, average)
}
fn examples(&self) -> Vec<Example> {
vec![Example {
description: "Compute the average of a list of numbers",
example: "[-50 100.0 25] | math avg",
Reduced LOC by replacing several instances of `Value::Int {}`, `Value::Float{}`, `Value::Bool {}`, and `Value::String {}` with `Value::int()`, `Value::float()`, `Value::boolean()` and `Value::string()` (#7412) # Description While perusing Value.rs, I noticed the `Value::int()`, `Value::float()`, `Value::boolean()` and `Value::string()` constructors, which seem designed to make it easier to construct various Values, but which aren't used often at all in the codebase. So, using a few find-replaces regexes, I increased their usage. This reduces overall LOC because structures like this: ``` Value::Int { val: a, span: head } ``` are changed into ``` Value::int(a, head) ``` and are respected as such by the project's formatter. There are little readability concerns because the second argument to all of these is `span`, and it's almost always extremely obvious which is the span at every callsite. # User-Facing Changes None. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2022-12-09 16:37:51 +00:00
result: Some(Value::float(25.0, Span::test_data())),
}]
}
}
pub fn average(values: &[Value], head: &Span) -> Result<Value, ShellError> {
let sum = reducer_for(Reduce::Summation);
Reduced LOC by replacing several instances of `Value::Int {}`, `Value::Float{}`, `Value::Bool {}`, and `Value::String {}` with `Value::int()`, `Value::float()`, `Value::boolean()` and `Value::string()` (#7412) # Description While perusing Value.rs, I noticed the `Value::int()`, `Value::float()`, `Value::boolean()` and `Value::string()` constructors, which seem designed to make it easier to construct various Values, but which aren't used often at all in the codebase. So, using a few find-replaces regexes, I increased their usage. This reduces overall LOC because structures like this: ``` Value::Int { val: a, span: head } ``` are changed into ``` Value::int(a, head) ``` and are respected as such by the project's formatter. There are little readability concerns because the second argument to all of these is `span`, and it's almost always extremely obvious which is the span at every callsite. # User-Facing Changes None. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2022-12-09 16:37:51 +00:00
let total = &sum(Value::int(0, *head), values.to_vec(), *head)?;
match total {
Value::Filesize { val, span } => Ok(Value::Filesize {
val: val / values.len() as i64,
span: *span,
}),
Value::Duration { val, span } => Ok(Value::Duration {
val: val / values.len() as i64,
span: *span,
}),
Reduced LOC by replacing several instances of `Value::Int {}`, `Value::Float{}`, `Value::Bool {}`, and `Value::String {}` with `Value::int()`, `Value::float()`, `Value::boolean()` and `Value::string()` (#7412) # Description While perusing Value.rs, I noticed the `Value::int()`, `Value::float()`, `Value::boolean()` and `Value::string()` constructors, which seem designed to make it easier to construct various Values, but which aren't used often at all in the codebase. So, using a few find-replaces regexes, I increased their usage. This reduces overall LOC because structures like this: ``` Value::Int { val: a, span: head } ``` are changed into ``` Value::int(a, head) ``` and are respected as such by the project's formatter. There are little readability concerns because the second argument to all of these is `span`, and it's almost always extremely obvious which is the span at every callsite. # User-Facing Changes None. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2022-12-09 16:37:51 +00:00
_ => total.div(*head, &Value::int(values.len() as i64, *head), *head),
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_examples() {
use crate::test_examples;
test_examples(SubCommand {})
}
}