Mirrors/hacktricks
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks synced 2024-11-16 09:48:14 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
hacktricks/pentesting/pentesting-web/README.md
CPol a0ae1cefcb
GitBook: [master] 6 pages modified
2021-06-26 13:01:09 +00:00

24 KiB
Raw Blame History

80,443 - Pentesting Web Methodology

If you want to know about my latest modifications/additions or you have any suggestion for HackTricks or PEASS, join the 💬 PEASS & HackTricks telegram group here, or follow me on Twitter ****🐦****@carlospolopm.
If you want to share some tricks with the community you can also submit pull requests to https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks that will be reflected in this book.
Don't forget to give ⭐ on the github to motivate me to continue developing this book.

Basic Info

The web service is the most common and extensive service and a lot of different types of vulnerabilities exists.

Default port: 80 HTTP, 443(HTTPS)

PORT    STATE SERVICE
80/tcp  open  http
443/tcp open  ssl/https

nc -v domain.com 80 # GET / HTTP/1.0
openssl s_client -connect domain.com:443 # GET / HTTP/1.0

Methodology summary

In this methodology we are going to suppose that you are going to a attack a domain or subdomain and only that. So, you should apply this methodology to each discovered domain, subdomain or IP with undetermined web server inside the scope.

  • Start by identifying the technologies used by the web server. Look for tricks to keep in mind during the rest of the test if you can successfully identify the tech.
    • Any known vulnerability of the version of the technology?
    • Using any well known tech? Any useful trick to extract more information?
    • Any specialised scanner to run like wpscan?
  • Launch general purposes scanners. You never know if they are going to find something or if the are going to find some interesting information.
  • Start with the initial checks: robots, sitemap, 404 error and SSL/TLS scan if HTTPS.
  • Start spidering the web page: It's time to find all the possible files, folders and parameters being used. Also, check for special findings.
    • Note that anytime a new directory is discovered during brute-forcing or spidering, it should be spidered.
  • Directory Brute-Forcing: Try to brute force all the discovered folders searching for new files and directories.
    • Note that anytime a new directory is discovered during brute-forcing or spidering, it should be Brute-Forced.
  • Backups checking: Test if you can find backups of discovered files appending common backup extensions.
  • Brute-Force parameters: Try to find hidden parameters.
  • Once you have identified all the possible endpoints accepting user input, check for all kind of vulnerabilities related to it.

Server Version Vulnerable?

Identify

Check if there are known vulnerabilities for the server version that is running.
The HTTP headers and cookies of the response could be very useful to identify the technologies and/or version being used. Nmap scan can identify the server version, but it could also be useful the tools whatweb, webtech or https://builtwith.com/:

whatweb -a 1 <URL> #Stealthy
whatweb -a 3 <URL> #Aggresive
webtech -u <URL>

Search for vulnerabilities of the web application version

Check if any WAF

Web tech tricks

Some tricks for finding vulnerabilities in different well known technologies being used:

Take into account that the same domain can be using different technologies in different ports, folders and subdomains.
If the web application is using any well known tech/platform listed before or any other, don't forget to search on the Internet new tricks and let me know!.

Source Code Review

If the source code of the application is available in github, apart of performing by your own a White box test of the application there is some information that could be useful for the current Black-Box testing:

  • Is there a Changelog or Readme or Version file or anything with version info accesible via web?
  • How and where are saved the credentials? Is there any accesible? file with credentials usernames or passwords?
  • Are passwords in plain text, encrypted or which hashing algorithm is used?
  • Is it using any master key for encrypting something? Which algorithm is used?
  • Can you access any of these files exploiting some vulnerability?
  • Is there any interesting information in the github solved and not solved issues? Or in commit history maybe some **password introduced inside an old commit**?

{% page-ref page="code-review-tools.md" %}

Automatic scanners

General purpose automatic scanners

nikto -h <URL>
whatweb -a 4 <URL>
wapiti -u <URL>
W3af
zarpxy #You can use an API
nuclei -t nuclei-templates

CMS scanners

If a CMS is used don't forget to run a scanner, maybe something juicy is found:

Clusterd: JBoss, ColdFusion, WebLogic, Tomcat, Railo, Axis2, Glassfish
CMSScan: WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, vBulletin websites for Security issues. GUI
VulnX: Joomla, Wordpress, Drupal, PrestaShop, Opencart
CMSMap: (W)ordpress, (J)oomla, (D)rupal or (M)oodle
droopscan: Drupal, Joomla, Moodle, Silverstripe, Wordpress

cmsmap [-f W] -F -d <URL>
wpscan --force update -e --url <URL>
joomscan --ec -u <URL>
joomlavs.rb #https://github.com/rastating/joomlavs

At this point you should already have some information of the web server being used by the client if any data is given and some tricks to keep in mind during the test. If you are lucky you have even found a CMS and run some scanner.

Step-by-step Web Application testing

From this point we are going to start interacting with the web application.

Initial checks

Default pages with interesting info:

  • /robots.txt
  • /sitemap.xml
  • Some 404 error - Some interesting data could be presented here.

Check if you can upload files [PUT verb, WebDav](put-method-webdav.md)

If you find that WebDav is enabled but you don't have enough permissions for uploading files in the root folder try to:

  • Brute Force credentials
  • Upload files via WebDav to the rest of found folders inside the web page. You may have permissions to upload files in other folders.

SSL/TLS vulnerabilites

Use testssl.sh to checks for vulnerabilities In Bug Bounty programs probably these kind of vulnerabilities won't be accepted and use a2sv to recheck the vulnerabilities:

./testssl.sh [--htmlfile] 10.10.10.10:443
#Use the --htmlfile to save the output inside an htmlfile also

## You can also use other tools, by testssl.sh at this momment is the best one (I think)
sslscan <host:port>
sslyze --regular <ip:port>

Information about SSL/TLS vulnerabilities:

Spidering

Launch some kind of spider inside the web. The goal of the spider is to find as much paths as possible from the tested application. Therefore, web crawling and external sources should be used to find as much valid paths as possible.

  • gospider go: HTML spider, LinkFinder in JS files and external sources Archive.org, CommonCrawl.org, VirusTotal.com, AlienVault.com.
  • hakrawler go: HML spider, with LinkFider for JS files and Archive.org as external source.
  • dirhunt python: HTML spider, also indicates "juicy files".
  • evine go: Interactive CLI HTML spider. It also searches in Archive.org
  • meg go: This tool isn't a spider but it can be useful. You can just indicate a file with hosts and a file with paths and meg will fetch each path on each host and save the response.
  • urlgrab go: HTML spider with JS rendering capabilities. However, it looks like it's unmaintained, the precompiled version is old and the current code doesn't compile
  • gau go): HTML spider that uses external providers wayback, otx, commoncrawl
  • ParamSpider: This script will find URLs with parameter and will list them.
  • galer go: HTML spider with JS rendering capabilities.
  • LinkFinder python: HTML spider, with JS beautify capabilities capable of search new paths in JS files. It could be worth it also take a look to ****JSScanner, which is a wrapper of LinkFinder.
  • JSParser python2.7: A python 2.7 script using Tornado and JSBeautifier to parse relative URLs from JavaScript files. Useful for easily discovering AJAX requests. Looks like unmaintaned.
  • relative-url-extractor ruby: Given a file HTML it will extract URLs from it using nifty regular expression to find and extract the relative URLs from ugly minify files.

Brute Force directories and files

Start brute-forcing from the root folder and be sure to brute-force all the directories found using this method and all the directories discovered by the Spidering you can do this brute-forcing **recursively** and appending at the beginning of the used wordlist the names of the found directories.
Tools:

  • Dirb / Dirbuster - Included in Kali, old and **slow** but functional. Allow auto-signed certificates and recursive search. Too slow compared with th other options.
  • Dirsearch (python): It doesn't allow auto-signed certificates but allows recursive search.
  • Gobuster go: It allows auto-signed certificates, it doesn't have recursive search.
  • Feroxbuster - Fast, supports recursive search.
  • wfuzz wfuzz -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-directories.txt https://domain.com/api/FUZZ
  • ffuf - Fast: ffuf -c -w /usr/share/wordlists/dirb/big.txt -u http://10.10.10.10/FUZZ

Recommended dictionaries:

Note that anytime a new directory is discovered during brute-forcing or spidering, it should be Brute-Forced.

What to check on each file found

  • Broken link checker: Find broken links inside HTMLs that may be prone to takeovers
  • File Backups: Once you have found all the files, look for backups of all the executable files "_.php_", "_.aspx_".... Common variations for naming a backup are: file.ext~, #file.ext#, ~file.ext, file.ext.bak, file.ext.tmp, file.ext.old, file.bak, file.tmp and file.old
  • Discover new parameters: You can use tools like Arjun and parameth to discover hidden parameters. If you can, you could try to search hidden parameters on each executable web file.
  • Comments: Check the comments of all the files, you can find credentials or hidden functionality.
    • If you are playing CTF, a "common" trick is to hide information inside comments at the right of the page using **hundreds** of **spaces** so you don't see the data if you open the source code with the browser. Other possibility is to use several new lines and hide information in a comment at the bottom of the web page.
  • API keys: If you find any API key there is guide that indicates how to use API keys of different platforms: keyhacks, zile, truffleHog, SecretFinder, [RegHex](https://github.com/l4yton/RegHex%29).
    • Google API keys: If you find any API key looking like AIzaSyA-qLheq6xjDiEIRisP_ujUseYLQCHUjik you can use the project gmapapiscanner ****to check which apis the key can access.
  • S3 Buckets: While spidering look if any subdomain or any link is related with some S3 bucket. In that case, check the permissions of the bucket.

Special findings

While performing the spidering and brute-forcing you could find interesting things that you have to notice.

Interesting files

  • Look for links to other files inside the CSS files.
  • If you find a .git file some information can be extracted
  • If you find a .env information such as api keys, dbs passwords and other information can be found.
  • If you find API endpoints you should also test them. These aren't files, but will probably "look like" them.
  • JS files: In the spidering section several tools that can extract path from JS files were mentioned. Also, It would be interesting to monitor each JS file found, as in some ocations, a change may indicate that a potential vulnerability was introduced in the code. You could use for example JSMon.
    • You should also check discovered JS files with RetireJS _**_to find if it's vulnerable.
    • Javascript Deobfuscator and Unpacker [https://lelinhtinh.github.io/de4js/](https://lelinhtinh.github.io/de4js/)
    • Javascript Beautifier [http://jsbeautifier.org/](https://beautifier.io/)
    • BrainFuck deobfuscation javascript with chars:"\[\]!+" [https://ooze.ninja/javascript/poisonjs/](https://ooze.ninja/javascript/poisonjs/)
    • In several occasions you will need to understand regular expressions used, this will be useful: https://regex101.com/
  • You could also monitor the files were forms were detected, as a change in the parameter or the apearance f a new form may indicate a potential new vulnerable functionality.

403 Forbidden/Basic Authentication/401 Unauthorized bypass

  • Try using different verbs to access the file: GET, POST, INVENTED

  • If /path is blocked, try using /%2e/path if the access is blocked by a proxy, this could bypass the protection. Try also /%252e/path double URL encode

  • Try Unicode bypass: /%ef%bc%8fpath The URL encoded chars are like "/" so when encoded back it will be //path and maybe you will have already bypassed the /path name check

  • Try to stress the server sending common GET requests [It worked for this guy wit Facebook](https://medium.com/@amineaboud/story-of-a-weird-vulnerability-i-found-on-facebook-fc0875eb5125).

  • Change the protocol: from http to https, or for https to http

  • Change Host header to some arbitrary value [that worked here](https://medium.com/@sechunter/exploiting-admin-panel-like-a-boss-fc2dd2499d31)

  • Other path bypasses:

    • site.com/secret –> HTTP 403 Forbidden
    • site.com/SECRET –> HTTP 200 OK
    • site.com/secret/ –> HTTP 200 OK
    • site.com/secret/. –> HTTP 200 OK
    • site.com//secret// –> HTTP 200 OK
    • site.com/./secret/.. –> HTTP 200 OK
    • site.com/secret.json –> HTTP 200 OK ruby

  • Other bypasses:

    • /v3/users_data/1234 --> 403 Forbidden
    • /v1/users_data/1234 --> 200 OK
    • {“id”:111} --> 401 Unauthriozied
    • {“id”:[111]} --> 200 OK
    • {“id”:111} --> 401 Unauthriozied
    • {“id”:{“id”:111}} --> 200 OK
    • {"user_id":"<legit_id>","user_id":"<victims_id>"} JSON Parameter Pollution
    • user_id=ATTACKER_ID&user_id=VICTIM_ID Parameter Pollution

  • Go to https://archive.org/web/ and check if in the past that file was worldwide accessible.

  • Fuzz the page: Try using HTTP Proxy Headers, HTTP Authentication Basic and NTLM brute-force with a few combinations only and other techniques. To do all of this I have created the tool fuzzhttpbypass.

    • X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1
    • X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
    • X-Remote-IP: 127.0.0.1
    • X-Remote-Addr: 127.0.0.1
    • X-ProxyUser-Ip: 127.0.0.1
    • X-Original-URL: 127.0.0.1
    • If the path is protected you can try to bypass the path protection using these other headers:
      • X-Original-URL: /admin/console
      • X-Rewrite-URL: /admin/console

  • Guess the password: Test the following common credentials. Do you know something about the victim? Or the CTF challenge name?

  • Brute force: Try basic, digest and NTLM auth.

    {% code title="Common creds" %}

    admin    admin
admin    password
admin    1234
admin    admin1234
admin    123456
root     toor
test     test
guest    guest

    {% endcode %}

502 Proxy Error

If any page responds with that code, it's probably a bad configured proxy. If you send a HTTP request like: GET https://google.com HTTP/1.1 with the host header and other common headers, the proxy will try to access google.com **and you will have found a SSRF**.

NTLM Authentication - Info disclosure

If the running server asking for authentication is Windows or you find a login asking for your credentials and asking for **domain** **name**, you can provoke an information disclosure.
Send the header: “Authorization: NTLM TlRMTVNTUAABAAAAB4IIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=” and due to how the NTLM authentication works, the server will respond with internal info IIS version, Windows version... inside the header "WWW-Authenticate".
You can automate this using the nmap plugin "http-ntlm-info.nse".

HTTP Redirect CTF

It is possible to put content inside a Redirection. This content won't be shown to the user as the browser will execute the redirection but something could be hidden in there.

Web Vulnerabilities

Now that a comprehensive enumeration of the web application has been performed it's time to check for a lot of possible vulnerabilities. You can find the checklist here:

{% page-ref page="../../pentesting-web/web-vulnerabilities-methodology.md" %}

TODO: Complete the list of vulnerabilities and techniques with https://six2dez.gitbook.io/pentest-book/others/web-checklist and https://kennel209.gitbooks.io/owasp-testing-guide-v4/content/en/web_application_security_testing/configuration_and_deployment_management_testing.html

User input related vulnerabilities special mention

Bypass regular login (POST or GET method)

If you find a login page, here you can find some techniques to try to bypass it:

  • Check for comments inside the page scroll down and to the right?
  • Check if you can directly access the restricted pages
  • Check to not send the parameters do not send any or only 1
  • Test manually very common passwords.
  • Check for default credentials
  • Check for common combinations root, admin, password, name of the tech, default user with one of these passwords
  • Check the PHP comparisons error: user[]=a&pwd=b , user=a&pwd[]=b , user[]=a&pwd[]=b
  • Create a dictionary using Cewl, add the default username and password if there is and try to brute-force it using all the words as usernames and password
  • Try to brute-force using a bigger dictionary (Brute force)

You should also check for:

Insert into/Create Object

Check for SQL INSERT INTO Injections

****