We have an early-out to avoid updating `RenderVisibilityRanges` when a
`VisibilityRange` component is *modified*, but not when one is
*removed*. This means that removing `VisibilityRange` from an entity
might not update the rendering.
This PR fixes the issue by adding a check for removed
`VisibilityRange`s.
# Objective
- Fixes#16472.
## Solution
- Add flags to `SpritePlugin` and `UiPlugin` to disable their picking
backends.
## Testing
- The change is pretty trivial, so not much to test!
---
## Migration Guide
- `UiPlugin` now contains an extra `add_picking` field if
`bevy_ui_picking_backend` is enabled.
- `SpritePlugin` is no longer a unit struct, and has one field if
`bevy_sprite_picking_backend` is enabled (otherwise no fields).
# Objective
- Fixes#16451.
## Solution
- Just allows the new license.
## Notes
According to the [Open Source
Initiative](https://opensource.org/license/unicode-inc-license-agreement-data-files-and-software),
the UNICODE-DFS-**2015** is superseded by UNICODE-3.0. I'm not sure
whether 2015 vs 2016 matters, and whether these are 3.0 and DFS-2016 are
materially different.
# Objective
- Fixes#16469.
## Solution
- Make the picking backend features not enabled by default in each
sub-crate.
- Make features in `bevy_internal` to set the backend features
- Make the root `bevy` crate set the features by default.
## Testing
- The mesh and sprite picking examples still work correctly.
I'm not sure why, but somehow `#[derive(Reflect)]` on a tuple struct
with a boxed trait object can result in linker errors when dynamic
linking is used on Windows using `rust-lld`:
```
= note: rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..reflect..PartialReflect$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::reflect_partial_eq::hc4cce1dc55e42e0b␍
rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..from_reflect..FromReflect$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::from_reflect::hc2b1d575b8491092␍
rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..tuple_struct..TupleStruct$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::clone_dynamic::hab42a4edc8d6b5c2␍
rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..tuple_struct..TupleStruct$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::field::h729a3d6dd6a27a43␍
rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..tuple_struct..TupleStruct$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::field_mut::hde1c34846d77344b␍
rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..type_registry..GetTypeRegistration$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::get_type_registration::hb96eb543e403a132␍
rust-lld: error: <root>: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..type_registry..GetTypeRegistration$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::register_type_dependencies::hcf1a4b69bcfea6ae␍
rust-lld: error: undefined symbol: bevy_animation::_::_$LT$impl$u20$bevy_reflect..reflect..PartialReflect$u20$for$u20$bevy_animation..AnimationEventFn$GT$::reflect_partial_eq::hc4cce1dc55e42e0b␍
```
etc.
Adding `#[reflect(opaque)]` to the `Reflect` derive fixes the problem,
and that's what this patch does. I think that adding
`#[reflect(opaque)]` is harmless, as there's little that reflection
allows with a boxed trait object anyhow.
# Objective
- Fixes#16406 even more. The previous implementation did not take into
account the depth of the requiree when setting the depth relative to the
required_by component.
## Solution
- Add the depth of the requiree!
## Testing
- Added a test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
We switch back and forwards between logical and physical coordinates all
over the place. Systems have to query for cameras and the UiScale when
they shouldn't need to. It's confusing and fragile and new scale factor
bugs get found constantly.
## Solution
* Use physical coordinates whereever possible in `bevy_ui`.
* Store physical coords in `ComputedNode` and tear out all the unneeded
scale factor calculations and queries.
* Add an `inverse_scale_factor` field to `ComputedNode` and set nodes
changed when their scale factor changes.
## Migration Guide
`ComputedNode`'s fields and methods now use physical coordinates.
`ComputedNode` has a new field `inverse_scale_factor`. Multiplying the
physical coordinates by the `inverse_scale_factor` will give the logical
values.
---------
Co-authored-by: atlv <email@atlasdostal.com>
# Objective
Needing to derive `AnimationEvent` for `Event` is unnecessary, and the
trigger logic coupled to it feels like we're coupling "event producer"
logic with the event itself, which feels wrong. It also comes with a
bunch of complexity, which is again unnecessary. We can have the
flexibility of "custom animation event trigger logic" without this
coupling and complexity.
The current `animation_events` example is also needlessly complicated,
due to it needing to work around system ordering issues. The docs
describing it are also slightly wrong. We can make this all a non-issue
by solving the underlying ordering problem.
Related to this, we use the `bevy_animation::Animation` system set to
solve PostUpdate animation order-of-operations issues. If we move this
to bevy_app as part of our "core schedule", we can cut out needless
`bevy_animation` crate dependencies in these instances.
## Solution
- Remove `AnimationEvent`, the derive, and all other infrastructure
associated with it (such as the `bevy_animation/derive` crate)
- Replace all instances of `AnimationEvent` traits with `Event + Clone`
- Store and use functions for custom animation trigger logic (ex:
`clip.add_event_fn()`). For "normal" cases users dont need to think
about this and should use the simpler `clip.add_event()`
- Run the `Animation` system set _before_ updating text
- Move `bevy_animation::Animation` to `bevy_app::Animation`. Remove
unnecessary `bevy_animation` dependency from `bevy_ui`
- Adjust `animation_events` example to use the simpler `clip.add_event`
API, as the workarounds are no longer necessary
This is polishing work that will land in 0.15, and I think it is simple
enough and valuable enough to land in 0.15 with it, in the interest of
making the feature as compelling as possible.
# Objective
A new user is likely to try `Query<Component>` instead of
`Query<&Component>`. The error message should guide them to the right
solution.
## Solution
Add a note to the on_unimplemented message for `QueryData` recommending
`&T` and `&mut T`.
The full error message now looks like:
```
error[E0277]: `A` is not valid to request as data in a `Query`
--> crates\bevy_ecs\src\query\world_query.rs:260:18
|
260 | fn system(query: Query<A>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^ invalid `Query` data
|
= help: the trait `fetch::QueryData` is not implemented for `A`
= note: if `A` is a component type, try using `&A` or `&mut A`
= help: the following other types implement trait `fetch::QueryData`:
&'__w mut T
&Archetype
&T
()
(F,)
(F0, F1)
(F0, F1, F2)
(F0, F1, F2, F3)
and 41 others
note: required by a bound in `system::query::Query`
--> crates\bevy_ecs\src\system\query.rs:362:37
|
362 | pub struct Query<'world, 'state, D: QueryData, F: QueryFilter = ()> {
| ^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Query`
```
Alternative to #16450
# Objective
detailed_trace! in its current form does not work (and breaks CI)
## Solution
Fix detailed_trace by checking for the feature properly, adding it to
the correct crates, and removing it from the incorrect crates
# Objective
- Fixes#16406
- Fixes an issue where registering a "deeper" required component, then a
"shallower" required component, would result in the wrong required
constructor being used for the root component.
## Solution
- Make `register_required_components` add any "parent" of a component as
`required_by` to the new "child".
- Assign the depth of the `requiree` plus 1 as the depth of a new
runtime required component.
## Testing
- Added two new tests.
# Objective
- Add methods to facilitate `TextFont` component creation and insertion.
## Solution
- Added `from_font` and `from_font_size` which return a new `TextFont`
with said attributes provided as parameters.
- Added `with_font` and `with_font_size` which return an existing
`TextFont` modifying said attributes with the values provided as
parameters.
## Testing
- CI Checks.
- Tested methods locally by changing values and running the `text_debug`
example.
# Objective
Run this without this PR:
`cargo build -p bevy_hierarchy --no-default-features`
You'll get:
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `bevy_reflect`
--> crates/bevy_hierarchy/src/events.rs:2:5
|
2 | use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of undeclared crate or module `bevy_reflect`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0432`.
error: could not compile `bevy_hierarchy` (lib) due to 1 previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
```
Because of this line:
```rs
use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
#[derive(Event, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "reflect", derive(Reflect), reflect(Debug, PartialEq))]
pub enum HierarchyEvent { .. }
```
## Solution
use FQN: `derive(bevy_reflect::Reflect)`
## Testing
`cargo build -p bevy_hierarchy --no-default-features`
# Objective
It looks like this file was created based on the `ui_texture_slice`
rendering code and some variable names weren't updated.
## Solution
Rename "texture slice" variable names to "box shadow".
# Objective
#16222 regressed the user experience of actually using gamepads:
```rust
// Before 16222
gamepad.just_pressed(GamepadButton::South)
// After 16222
gamepad.digital.just_pressed(GamepadButton::South)
// Before 16222
gamepad.get(GamepadButton::RightTrigger2)
// After 16222
gamepad.analog.get(GamepadButton::RighTrigger2)
```
Users shouldn't need to think about "digital vs analog" when checking if
a button is pressed. This abstraction was intentional and I strongly
believe it is in our users' best interest. Buttons and Axes are _both_
digital and analog, and this is largely an implementation detail. I
don't think reverting this will be controversial.
## Solution
- Revert most of #16222
- Add the `Into<T>` from #16222 to the internals
- Expose read/write `digital` and `analog` accessors on gamepad, in the
interest of enabling the mocking scenarios covered in #16222 (and
allowing the minority of users that care about the "digital" vs "analog"
distinction in this context to make that distinction)
---------
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rob Parrett <robparrett@gmail.com>
# Objective
- bevy_render (poorly) implements gcd (which should be in bevy_math but
theres not enough justification to have it there either anyways cus its
just one usage)
## Solution
- hardcoded LUT replacement for the one usage
## Testing
- verified the alternative implementation of 4/gcd(4,x) agreed with
original for 0..200
# Objective
https://github.com/AccessKit/accesskit/pull/475 changed how text content
should be set for AccessKit nodes with a role of `Label`. This was
unfortunately missing from #16234.
## Solution
When building an `accesskit::Node` with `Role::Label`, calls `set_value`
instead of `set_label` on the node to set its content.
## Testing
I can't test this right now on my Windows machine due to a compilation
error with wgpu-hal I have no idea how to resolve.
**NOTE: This is based on, and should be merged alongside,
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15482.** I'll leave this in
draft until that PR is merged.
# Objective
Equivalent of https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/15482 but for
serialization. See that issue for the motivation.
Also part of this tracking issue:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15518
This PR is non-breaking, just like the deserializer PR (because the new
type parameter `P` has a default `P = ()`).
## Solution
Identical solution to the deserializer PR.
## Testing
Added unit tests and a very comprehensive doc test outlining a clear
example and use case.
# Objective
Fixes#16406.
Currently, the `#[require(...)]` attribute internally registers
component requirements using `register_required_components_manual`. This
is done recursively in a way where every requirement in the "inheritance
tree" is added into a flat `RequiredComponents` hash map with component
constructors and inheritance depths stored.
However, this does not consider runtime requirements: if a plugins has
already registered `C` as required by `B`, and a component `A` requires
`B` through the macro attribute, spawning an entity with `A` won't add
`C`. The `required_by` hash set for `C` doesn't have `A`, and the
`RequiredComponents` of `A` don't have `C`.
Intuitively, I would've thought that the macro attribute's requirements
were always added *before* runtime requirements, and in that case I
believe this shouldn't have been an issue. But the macro requirements
are based on `Component::register_required_components`, which in a lot
of cases (I think) is only called *after* the first time a bundle with
the component is inserted. So if a runtime requirement is defined
*before* this (as is often the case, during `Plugin::build`), the macro
may not take it into account.
## Solution
Register requirements inherited from the `required` component in
`register_required_components_manual_unchecked`.
## Testing
I added a test, essentially the same as in #16406, and it now passes. I
also ran some of the tests in #16409, and they seem to work as expected.
All the existing tests for required components pass.
# Objective
Seemed to have missed the export of `DynamicComponentFetch` from #15593.
`TryFromFilteredError` which is returned by `impl
TryFrom<FiliteredEntityMut/Ref> for EntityRef/Mut` also seemed to have
been missing.
## Solution
Export both of them.
# Objective
MSRV in the standalone crates should be accurate
## Solution
Determine the msrv of each crate and set it
## Testing
Adding better msrv checks to the CI is a next-step.
# Objective
- Fix part of #15920
## Solution
- Keep track of the last written amount of bytes, and bind only that
much of the buffer.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how? No
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
---
## Migration Guide
- Fixed a bug with StorageBuffer and DynamicStorageBuffer binding data
from the previous frame(s) due to caching GPU buffers between frames.
# Objective
When adding custom BRP methods one might need to:
- Run custom systems in the `RemoteLast` schedule.
- Order those systems before/after request processing and cleanup.
For example in `bevy_remote_inspector` we need a way to perform some
preparation _before_ request processing. And to perform cleanup
_between_ request processing and watcher cleanup.
## Solution
- Make `RemoteLast` public
- Add `RemoteSet` with `ProcessRequests` and `Cleanup` variants.
I didn't mean to make this item private, fixing it for the 0.15 release
to be consistent with 0.14.
(maintainers: please make sure this gets merged into the 0.15 release
branch as well as main)
# Objective
- Fixes#16152
## Solution
- Put `bevy_window` and `bevy_a11y` behind the `bevy_window` feature.
they were the only difference
- Add `ScheduleRunnerPlugin` to the `DefaultPlugins` when `bevy_window`
is disabled
- Remove `HeadlessPlugins`
- Update the `headless` example
# Objective
- Fixes#16285
- Inactive camera are keeping the component `ViewUniformOffset` from
when they were active, still matching some queries trying to render to
them
## Solution
- Remove component `ViewUniformOffset` from cameras that are inactive
## Testing
- Ran example `render_primitives` and switched camera
Tweaks picking docs slightly for formatting and to add additional
context about the ordering of `Over` and `Out` events. Also shifts `Out`
to trigger before `Over` in the global event ordering.
Because of how focus is tracked, we must send all `Over` and `Out`
events at the same time, in a block. Originally I had `Over` precede
`Out` in the global event order, because this seemed natural. However,
the effect of this, when a pointer moves between entities, is to have
the new entity receive `Over` before the old entity received `Out`,
which several users found confusing.
The new ordering (out before over globally, over before out locally per
entity) should make it much easier to write hover state cleanup code.
# Objective
To capture the performance impact of removing and adding UI nodes add a
`respawn` commandline argument to the `many_buttons` stress test example
that despawns the existing UI layout and then spawns a new layout to
replace it every frame.
## Testing
To run the example with the new changes use:
```cargo run --example many_buttons --release -- --respawn```
# Objective
- When picking sprites, the pointer is offset from the mouse, causing
you to pick sprites you're not mousing over!
## Solution
- Shift over the cursor by the minimum of the viewport.
## Testing
- I was already using the bevy_mod_picking PR for my project, so it
seems to work!
- I tested this on the sprite_example (making the camera only render to
part of the viewport), and it also works there.
## Notes
- This is just https://github.com/aevyrie/bevy_mod_picking/pull/365 but
in Bevy form.
- We don't need to renormalize the viewport in any way since the
viewport is specified in pixels, so all that matters is that the origin
is correct.
Co-authored-by: johanhelsing <johanhelsing@gmail.com>
# Objective
PCSS still has some fundamental issues (#16155). We should resolve them
before "releasing" the feature.
## Solution
1. Rename the already-optional `pbr_pcss` cargo feature to
`experimental_pbr_pcss` to better communicate its state to developers.
2. Adjust the description of the `experimental_pbr_pcss` cargo feature
to better communicate its state to developers.
3. Gate PCSS-related light component fields behind that cargo feature,
to prevent surfacing them to developers by default.
# Objective
UI Anti-aliasing is incorrectly implemented. It always uses an edge
radius of 0.25 logical pixels, and ignores the physical resolution. For
low dpi screens 0.25 is is too low and on higher dpi screens the
physical edge radius is much too large, resulting in visual artifacts.
## Solution
Multiply the distance by the scale factor in the `antialias` function so
that the edge radius stays constant in physical pixels.
## Testing
To see the problem really clearly run the button example with `UiScale`
set really high. With `UiScale(25.)` on main if you examine the button's
border you can see a thick gradient fading away from the edges:
<img width="127" alt="edgg"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7c852030-c0e8-4aef-8d3e-768cb2464cab">
With this PR the edges are sharp and smooth at all scale factors:
<img width="127" alt="edge"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3231140-1bbc-4a4f-a1d3-dde21f287988">
# Objective
Text2d doesn't respond to changes to the window scalefactor.
Fixes#16223
## Solution
In `update_text2d_layout` store the previous scale factor in a `Local`
instead and check against the current scale factor to detect changes.
It seems like previously the text wasn't updated because of a bug with
the `WindowScaleFactorChanged` event and it isn't emitted after changes
to the scale factor. That needs to be looked into, but this will work
for now.
## Testing
Really simple app that draws a big message in the middle of the window:
```
use bevy::prelude::*;
fn main() {
App::new()
.add_plugins(DefaultPlugins)
.add_systems(Startup, setup)
.run();
}
fn setup(mut commands: Commands) {
commands.spawn(Camera2d);
commands.spawn((
Text2d::new("Hello"),
TextFont {
font_size: 400.,
..Default::default()
},
));
}
```
Looks fine:
<img width="500" alt="hello1"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5320746b-687e-4682-9e4c-bc43ab7ff9d3">
On main, after changing the monitor's scale factor:
<img width="500" alt="hello2"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/486cea16-fc44-4d66-9468-6f68905d4196">
With this PR the text maintains the same size and position after the
scale factor is changed.
# Objective
- Describe the objective or issue this PR addresses.
Use the fully qualified name for `Component` in the `require` attribute
- If you're fixing a specific issue, say "Fixes #X".
Fixes#16377
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
Use the fully qualified name for `Component` in the `require` attribute,
i.e.,`<#ident as #bevy_ecs_path::component::Component>`
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
`cargo run -p ci -- lints`
`cargo run -p ci -- compile`
`cargo run -p ci -- test`
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
no
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
try to compile
```rust
#[derive(::bevy::ecs::component::Component, Default)]
pub struct A;
#[derive(::bevy::ecs::component::Component)]
#[require(A)]
pub struct B;
```
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
Mac only
---
</details>
## Migration Guide
> This section is optional. If there are no breaking changes, you can
delete this section.
- If this PR is a breaking change (relative to the last release of
Bevy), describe how a user might need to migrate their code to support
these changes
- Simply adding new functionality is not a breaking change.
- Fixing behavior that was definitely a bug, rather than a questionable
design choice is not a breaking change.
Co-authored-by: Volodymyr Enhelhardt <volodymyr.enhelhardt@ambr.net>
# Objective
We currently use special "floating" constructors for `EasingCurve`,
`FunctionCurve`, and `ConstantCurve` (ex: `easing_curve`). This erases
the type being created (and in general "what is happening"
structurally), for very minimal ergonomics improvements. With rare
exceptions, we prefer normal `X::new()` constructors over floating `x()`
constructors in Bevy. I don't think this use case merits special casing
here.
## Solution
Add `EasingCurve::new()`, use normal constructors everywhere, and remove
the floating constructors.
I think this should land in 0.15 in the interest of not breaking people
later.
# Objective
Fixes#16266
## Solution
Added an `UnregisterSystem` command struct and
`Commands::unregister_system`. Also renamed `World::remove_system` and
`World::remove_system_cached` to `World::unregister_*`
## Testing
It's a fairly simple change, but I tested locally to ensure it actually
works.
---------
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Brienen <benjamin.brienen@outlook.com>
# Objective
Fixes#16316
## Solution
Tweaked a few crates cargo files until I was able to build and test
`bevy_ui` via `cargo test --package bevy_ui`
## Testing
- ran `cargo test --package bevy_ui` successfully
- CI should catch anything amiss (Hopefully?)
# Objective
`ButtonBundle` has an `ImageNode` component (renamed from `UiImage`)
which wasn't a problem in 0.14 but in 0.15 `requires` pulls in the
`ContentSize` and `NodeImageSize` which means that by default
`ButtonBundle` nodes are given a measure func based on the size of the
image belonging to `TRANSPARENT_IMAGE_HANDLE`, which is 1x1.
This doesn't make sense and the behaviour for default image nodes should
either be to go to zero size or not add a measure func.
## Solution
Check if an image has a `TRANSPARENT_IMAGE_HANDLE` and if it does remove
its measure func.
Possibly a zero-sized measure would make more sense, but that would
break existing code.
## Testing
Used `ButtonBundle` in the 0.15 `button` example and the border doesn't
render, after this change it does.
# Objective
- Fix bug where `UiSurface::set_camera_children` (and
`UiSurface::update_children` sometimes) will panic if you remove and add
a `Node` component in a single tick. This is more likely to happen now
because of `remove_with_requires`.
## Solution
- Filter out entities with `Node` when cleaning up entities from
`RemovedComponents<Node>`.
## Testing
- Not tested (rust compiler refused to cooperate when I tried to patch
this into my project), correct by inspection.
# Objective
- Allow to configure `on_thread_spawn` and `on_thread_destroy` when
using `TaskPoolPlugin` of bevy.
## Solution
- In `TaskPoolThreadAssignmentPolicy`, two options `on_thread_spawn` and
`on_thread_destroy` are added, which will be passed to two new methods
motioned above when creating corresponding task pool using builder.
- Due to lack of debug derive for these two options, manually implement
the debug for `TaskPoolThreadAssignmentPolicy`.
---
## Changelog
### Added
- `on_thread_spawn` option and `on_thread_destroy` option to the
`TaskPoolPlugin`, allow user to customize them as needed.
## Migration Guide
- `TaskPooolThreadAssignmentPolicy` now has two additional fields:
`on_thread_spawn` and `on_thread_destroy`. Please consider defaulting
them to `None`.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <mockersf@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
_If I understand it correctly_, we were checking mesh visibility, as
well as re-rendering point and spot light shadow maps for each view.
This makes it so that M views and N lights produce M x N complexity.
This PR aims to fix that, as well as introduce a stress test for this
specific scenario.
## Solution
- Keep track of what lights have already had mesh visibility calculated
and do not calculate it again;
- Reuse shadow depth textures and attachments across all views, and only
render shadow maps for the _first_ time a light is encountered on a
view;
- Directional lights remain unaltered, since their shadow map cascades
are view-dependent;
- Add a new `many_cameras_lights` stress test example to verify the
solution
## Showcase
110% speed up on the stress test
83% reduction of memory usage in stress test
### Before (5.35 FPS on stress test)
<img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-11 at 12 25 57"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/136b0785-e9a4-44df-9a22-f99cc465e126">
### After (11.34 FPS on stress test)
<img width="1392" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-11 at 12 24 35"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b8dd858f-5e19-467f-8344-2b46ca039630">
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- On my game project where I have two cameras, and many shadow casting
lights I managed to get pretty much double the FPS.
- Also included a stress test, see the comparison above
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- Yes, I would like help verifying that this fix is indeed correct, and
that we were really re-rendering the shadow maps by mistake and it's
indeed okay to not do that
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- Run the `many_cameras_lights` example
- On the `main` branch, cherry pick the commit with the example (`git
cherry-pick --no-commit 1ed4ace01`) and run it
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
- macOS
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
Should compile successfully with any combination of features
## Solution
Add the missing import on the right cfg.
## Testing
Tested building locally.
Fixes https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/16352
# Objective
Some target folders (such as
`crates\bevy_color\crates\gen_tests\target`) are not in the
`.gitignore`.
## Solution
Use a better pattern.
## Testing
Tested locally
