## Objective
The new Required Components feature (#14791) in Bevy allows spawning a
fixed set of components with a single method with cool require macro.
However, there's currently no corresponding method to remove all those
components together. This makes it challenging to keep insertion and
removal code in sync, especially for simple using cases.
```rust
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(Y)]
struct X;
#[derive(Component, Default)]
struct Y;
world.entity_mut(e).insert(X); // Spawns both X and Y
world.entity_mut(e).remove::<X>();
world.entity_mut(e).remove::<Y>(); // We need to manually remove dependencies without any sync with the `require` macro
```
## Solution
Simplifies component management by providing operations for removal
required components.
This PR introduces simple 'footgun' methods to removes all components of
this bundle and its required components.
Two new methods are introduced:
For Commands:
```rust
commands.entity(e).remove_with_requires::<B>();
```
For World:
```rust
world.entity_mut(e).remove_with_requires::<B>();
```
For performance I created new field in Bundels struct. This new field
"contributed_bundle_ids" contains cached ids for dynamic bundles
constructed from bundle_info.cintributed_components()
## Testing
The PR includes three test cases:
1. Removing a single component with requirements using World.
2. Removing a bundle with requirements using World.
3. Removing a single component with requirements using Commands.
4. Removing a single component with **runtime** requirements using
Commands
These tests ensure the feature works as expected across different
scenarios.
## Showcase
Example:
```rust
use bevy_ecs::prelude::*;
#[derive(Component)]
#[require(Y)]
struct X;
#[derive(Component, Default)]
#[require(Z)]
struct Y;
#[derive(Component, Default)]
struct Z;
#[derive(Component)]
struct W;
let mut world = World::new();
// Spawn an entity with X, Y, Z, and W components
let entity = world.spawn((X, W)).id();
assert!(world.entity(entity).contains::<X>());
assert!(world.entity(entity).contains::<Y>());
assert!(world.entity(entity).contains::<Z>());
assert!(world.entity(entity).contains::<W>());
// Remove X and required components Y, Z
world.entity_mut(entity).remove_with_requires::<X>();
assert!(!world.entity(entity).contains::<X>());
assert!(!world.entity(entity).contains::<Y>());
assert!(!world.entity(entity).contains::<Z>());
assert!(world.entity(entity).contains::<W>());
```
## Motivation for PR
#15580
## Performance
I made simple benchmark
```rust
let mut world = World::default();
let entity = world.spawn_empty().id();
let steps = 100_000_000;
let start = std::time::Instant::now();
for _ in 0..steps {
world.entity_mut(entity).insert(X);
world.entity_mut(entity).remove::<(X, Y, Z, W)>();
}
let end = std::time::Instant::now();
println!("normal remove: {:?} ", (end - start).as_secs_f32());
println!("one remove: {:?} micros", (end - start).as_secs_f64() / steps as f64 * 1_000_000.0);
let start = std::time::Instant::now();
for _ in 0..steps {
world.entity_mut(entity).insert(X);
world.entity_mut(entity).remove_with_requires::<X>();
}
let end = std::time::Instant::now();
println!("remove_with_requires: {:?} ", (end - start).as_secs_f32());
println!("one remove_with_requires: {:?} micros", (end - start).as_secs_f64() / steps as f64 * 1_000_000.0);
```
Output:
CPU: Amd Ryzen 7 2700x
```bash
normal remove: 17.36135
one remove: 0.17361348299999999 micros
remove_with_requires: 17.534006
one remove_with_requires: 0.17534005400000002 micros
```
NOTE: I didn't find any tests or mechanism in the repository to update
BundleInfo after creating new runtime requirements with an existing
BundleInfo. So this PR also does not contain such logic.
## Future work (outside this PR)
Create cache system for fast removing components in "safe" mode, where
"safe" mode is remove only required components that will be no longer
required after removing root component.
---------
Co-authored-by: a.yamaev <a.yamaev@smartengines.com>
Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
# Objective
Support accessing dynamic resources in a dynamic system, including
accessing them by component id. This is similar to how dynamic
components can be queried using `Query<FilteredEntityMut>`.
## Solution
Create `FilteredResources` and `FilteredResourcesMut` types that act
similar to `FilteredEntityRef` and `FilteredEntityMut` and that can be
used as system parameters.
## Example
```rust
// Use `FilteredResourcesParamBuilder` to declare access to resources.
let system = (FilteredResourcesParamBuilder::new(|builder| {
builder.add_read::<B>().add_read::<C>();
}),)
.build_state(&mut world)
.build_system(resource_system);
world.init_resource::<A>();
world.init_resource::<C>();
fn resource_system(res: FilteredResources) {
// The resource exists, but we have no access, so we can't read it.
assert!(res.get::<A>().is_none());
// The resource doesn't exist, so we can't read it.
assert!(res.get::<B>().is_none());
// The resource exists and we have access, so we can read it.
let c = res.get::<C>().unwrap();
// The type parameter can be left out if it can be determined from use.
let c: Res<C> = res.get().unwrap();
}
```
## Future Work
As a follow-up PR, `ReflectResource` can be modified to take `impl
Into<FilteredResources>`, similar to how `ReflectComponent` takes `impl
Into<FilteredEntityRef>`. That will allow dynamic resources to be
accessed using reflection.
# Objective
The current observers have some unfortunate footguns where you can end
up confused about what is actually being observed. For apps you can
chain observe like `app.observe(..).observe(..)` which works like you
would expect, but if you try the same with world the first `observe()`
will return the `EntityWorldMut` for the created observer, and the
second `observe()` will only observe on the observer entity. It took
several hours for multiple people on discord to figure this out, which
is not a great experience.
## Solution
Rename `observe` on entities to `observe_entity`. It's slightly more
verbose when you know you have an entity, but it feels right to me that
observers for specific things have more specific naming, and it prevents
this issue completely.
Another possible solution would be to unify `observe` on `App` and
`World` to have the same kind of return type, but I'm not sure exactly
what that would look like.
## Testing
Simple name change, so only concern is docs really.
---
## Migration Guide
The `observe()` method on entities has been renamed to
`observe_entity()` to prevent confusion about what is being observed in
some cases.
# Objective
Fixes#14511.
`despawn` allows you to remove entities from the world. However, if the
entity does not exist, it emits a warning. This may not be intended
behavior for many users who have use cases where they need to call
`despawn` regardless of if the entity actually exists (see the issue),
or don't care in general if the entity already doesn't exist.
(Also trying to gauge interest on if this feature makes sense, I'd
personally love to have it, but I could see arguments that this might be
a footgun. Just trying to help here 😄 If there's no contention I could
also implement this for `despawn_recursive` and `despawn_descendants` in
the same PR)
## Solution
Add `try_despawn`, `try_despawn_recursive` and
`try_despawn_descendants`.
Modify `World::despawn_with_caller` to also take in a `warn` boolean
argument, which is then considered when logging the warning. Set
`log_warning` to `true` in the case of `despawn`, and `false` in the
case of `try_despawn`.
## Testing
Ran `cargo run -p ci` on macOS, it seemed fine.
# Objective
System param validation warnings should be configurable and default to
"warn once" (per system).
Fixes: #15391
## Solution
`SystemMeta` is given a new `ParamWarnPolicy` field.
The policy decides whether warnings will be emitted by each system param
when it fails validation.
The policy is updated by the system after param validation fails.
Example warning:
```
2024-09-30T18:10:04.740749Z WARN bevy_ecs::system::function_system: System fallible_params::do_nothing_fail_validation will not run because it requested inaccessible system parameter Single<(), (With<Player>, With<Enemy>)>
```
Currently, only the first invalid parameter is displayed.
Warnings can be disabled on function systems using
`.param_never_warn()`.
(there is also `.with_param_warn_policy(policy)`)
## Testing
Ran `fallible_params` example.
---------
Co-authored-by: SpecificProtagonist <vincentjunge@posteo.net>
# Objective
The `queue()` method is an optional trait method which is necessary for
deferred operations (such as command queues) to work properly in the
context of an observer.
This method was omitted from the proc_macro blanket implementation of
`ParamSet` for tuples; as a result, SystemParams with deferred
application (such as Commands) would not work in observers if they were
part of a ParamSet.
This appears to have been a simple omission, as `queue()` was already
implemented for the separate blanket implementation of `ParamSet` for
`Vec<T>`. In both cases, it is a simple pass-through to the component
SystemParams.
## Solution
Add the `queue()` method implementation to the `impl_param_set` proco
macro.
## Testing
Added a unit test which clearly demonstrates the issue. It fails before
the fix, and passes afterwards.
---
# Objective
- Closes#15577
## Solution
The following functions can now also take multiple component IDs and
return multiple pointers back:
- `EntityRef::get_by_id`
- `EntityMut::get_by_id`
- `EntityMut::into_borrow_by_id`
- `EntityMut::get_mut_by_id`
- `EntityMut::into_mut_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::get_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_borrow_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::get_mut_by_id`
- `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_by_id`
If you pass in X, you receive Y:
- give a single `ComponentId`, receive a single `Ptr`/`MutUntyped`
- give a `[ComponentId; N]` (array), receive a `[Ptr; N]`/`[MutUntyped;
N]`
- give a `&[ComponentId; N]` (array), receive a `[Ptr; N]`/`[MutUntyped;
N]`
- give a `&[ComponentId]` (slice), receive a
`Vec<Ptr>`/`Vec<MutUntyped>`
- give a `&HashSet<ComponentId>`, receive a `HashMap<ComponentId,
Ptr>`/`HashMap<ComponentId, MutUntyped>`
## Testing
- Added 4 new tests.
---
## Migration Guide
- The following functions now return an `Result<_,
EntityComponentError>` instead of a `Option<_>`: `EntityRef::get_by_id`,
`EntityMut::get_by_id`, `EntityMut::into_borrow_by_id`,
`EntityMut::get_mut_by_id`, `EntityMut::into_mut_by_id`,
`EntityWorldMut::get_by_id`, `EntityWorldMut::into_borrow_by_id`,
`EntityWorldMut::get_mut_by_id`, `EntityWorldMut::into_mut_by_id`
# Objective
Relevant: #15208
## Solution
I went ahead and added the variadics documentation in all applicable
locations.
## Testing
- I built the documentation and inspected it to see whether the feature
is there.
As discussed in #15521
- Partial revert of #14897, reverting the change to the methods to
consume `self`
- The `insert_if` method is kept
The migration guide of #14897 should be removed
Closes#15521
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Previous PR https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/14549 was closed in
error and couldn't be reopened since I had updated the branch
😿
# Objective
Fixes#14465
## Solution
`ReflectMapEntities` now works similarly to `MapEntities` in that it
works on the reflected value itself rather than the component in the
world after insertion. This makes it so that observers see the remapped
entities on insertion rather than the entity IDs from the scene.
`ReflectMapEntities` now works for both components and resources, so we
only need the one.
## Testing
* New unit test for `Observer`s + `DynamicScene`s
* New unit test for `Observer`s + `Scene`s
* Open to suggestions for other tests!
---
## Migration Guide
- Consumers of `ReflectMapEntities` will need to call `map_entities` on
values prior to inserting them into the world.
- Implementors of `MapEntities` will need to remove the `mappings`
method, which is no longer needed for `ReflectMapEntities` and has been
removed from the trait.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Chernyshchyk <genaloner@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15540
End-users risk using `World::flush_commands` instead of `World::flush`,
which panics if any queued commands are `spawn`. Hiding
`World::flush_commands` would help avoid calling a potentially panicky
function, and helps alleviate end-user API confusion.
## Solution
This PR updates the function visibility to crate-level, like
`World::flush_entities`, hiding it from the end-user while still making
it accessible for the tests that are currently set up.
## Testing
The change was tested by executing the available tests for `bevy_ecs`.
From what I've gathered, `World::flush_commands` is not used in any
other bevy crate. If further testing is recommended, please inform me!
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15367.
Currently, required components can only be defined through the `require`
macro attribute. While this should be used in most cases, there are also
several instances where you may want to define requirements at runtime,
commonly in plugins.
Example use cases:
- Require components only if the relevant optional plugins are enabled.
For example, a `SleepTimer` component (for physics) is only relevant if
the `SleepPlugin` is enabled.
- Third party crates can define their own requirements for first party
types. For example, "each `Handle<Mesh>` should require my custom
rendering data components". This also gets around the orphan rule.
- Generic plugins that add marker components based on the existence of
other components, like a generic `ColliderPlugin<C: AnyCollider>` that
wants to add a `ColliderMarker` component for all types of colliders.
- This is currently relevant for the retained render world in #15320.
The `ExtractComponentPlugin<C>` should add `SyncToRenderWorld` to all
components that should be extracted. This is currently done with
observers, which is more expensive than required components, and causes
archetype moves.
- Replace some built-in components with custom versions. For example, if
`GlobalTransform` required `Transform` through `TransformPlugin`, but we
wanted to use a `CustomTransform` type, we could replace
`TransformPlugin` with our own plugin. (This specific example isn't
good, but there are likely better use cases where this may be useful)
See #15367 for more in-depth reasoning.
## Solution
Add `register_required_components::<T, R>` and
`register_required_components_with::<T, R>` methods for `Default` and
custom constructors respectively. These methods exist on `App` and
`World`.
```rust
struct BirdPlugin;
impl Plugin for BirdPlugin {
fn plugin(app: &mut App) {
// Make `Bird` require `Wings` with a `Default` constructor.
app.register_required_components::<Bird, Wings>();
// Make `Wings` require `FlapSpeed` with a custom constructor.
// Fun fact: Some hummingbirds can flutter their wings 80 times per second!
app.register_required_components_with::<Wings, FlapSpeed>(|| FlapSpeed::from_duration(1.0 / 80.0));
}
}
```
The custom constructor is a function pointer to match the `require` API,
though it could take a raw value too.
Requirement inheritance works similarly as with the `require` attribute.
If `Bird` required `FlapSpeed` directly, it would take precedence over
indirectly requiring it through `Wings`. The same logic applies to all
levels of the inheritance tree.
Note that registering the same component requirement more than once will
panic, similarly to trying to add multiple component hooks of the same
type to the same component. This avoids constructor conflicts and
confusing ordering issues.
### Implementation
Runtime requirements have two additional challenges in comparison to the
`require` attribute.
1. The `require` attribute uses recursion and macros with clever
ordering to populate hash maps of required components for each component
type. The expected semantics are that "more specific" requirements
override ones deeper in the inheritance tree. However, at runtime, there
is no representation of how "specific" each requirement is.
2. If you first register the requirement `X -> Y`, and later register `Y
-> Z`, then `X` should also indirectly require `Z`. However, `Y` itself
doesn't know that it is required by `X`, so it's not aware that it
should update the list of required components for `X`.
My solutions to these problems are:
1. Store the depth in the inheritance tree for each entry of a given
component's `RequiredComponents`. This is used to determine how
"specific" each requirement is. For `require`-based registration, these
depths are computed as part of the recursion.
2. Store and maintain a `required_by` list in each component's
`ComponentInfo`, next to `required_components`. For `require`-based
registration, these are also added after each registration, as part of
the recursion.
When calling `register_required_components`, it works as follows:
1. Get the required components of `Foo`, and check that `Bar` isn't
already a *direct* requirement.
3. Register `Bar` as a required component for `Foo`, and add `Foo` to
the `required_by` list for `Bar`.
4. Find and register all indirect requirements inherited from `Bar`,
adding `Foo` to the `required_by` list for each component.
5. Iterate through components that require `Foo`, registering the new
inherited requires for them as indirect requirements.
The runtime registration is likely slightly more expensive than the
`require` version, but it is a one-time cost, and quite negligible in
practice, unless projects have hundreds or thousands of runtime
requirements. I have not benchmarked this however.
This does also add a small amount of extra cost to the `require`
attribute for updating `required_by` lists, but I expect it to be very
minor.
## Testing
I added some tests that are copies of the `require` versions, as well as
some tests that are more specific to the runtime implementation. I might
add a few more tests though.
## Discussion
- Is `register_required_components` a good name? Originally I went for
`register_component_requirement` to be consistent with
`register_component_hooks`, but the general feature is often referred to
as "required components", which is why I changed it to
`register_required_components`.
- Should we *not* panic for duplicate requirements? If so, should they
just be ignored, or should the latest registration overwrite earlier
ones?
- If we do want to panic for duplicate, conflicting registrations,
should we at least not panic if the registrations are *exactly* the
same, i.e. same component and same constructor? The current
implementation panics for all duplicate direct registrations regardless
of the constructor.
## Next Steps
- Allow `register_required_components` to take a `Bundle` instead of a
single required component.
- I could also try to do it in this PR if that would be preferable.
- Not directly related, but archetype invariants?
# Objective
Add a `Populated` system parameter that acts like `Query`, but prevents
system from running if there are no matching entities.
Fixes: #15302
## Solution
Implement the system param which newtypes the `Query`.
The only change is new validation, which fails if query is empty.
The new system param is used in `fallible_params` example.
## Testing
Ran `fallible_params` example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Provide a generic and _reflectable_ way to iterate over contained
entities
## Solution
Adds two new traits:
* `VisitEntities`: Reflectable iteration, accepts a closure rather than
producing an iterator. Implemented by default for `IntoIterator`
implementing types. A proc macro is also provided.
* A `Mut` variant of the above. Its derive macro uses the same field
attribute to avoid repetition.
## Testing
Added a test for `VisitEntities` that also transitively tests its derive
macro as well as the default `MapEntities` impl.
# Objective
`World::flush_commands` will cause a panic with `error[B0003]: Could not
insert a bundle [...] for entity [...] because it doesn't exist in this
World` if there was a `spawn` command in the queue and you should
instead use `flush` for this but this isn't mentioned in the docs
## Solution
Add a note to the docs suggesting to use `World::flush` in this context.
This error doesn't appear to happen with `spawn_batch` so I didn't add
that to the note although you can cause it with
`commands.spawn_empty().insert(...)` but I wasn't sure that was worth
the documentation complexity as it is pretty unlikely (and equivalent to
`commands.spawn(...)`.
# Objective
Improve the documentation of `SystemParamBuilder`. Not all builder types
have documentation, and the documentation is spread around and not
linked together well.
## Solution
Reorganize `SystemParamBuilder` docs and examples. All builder types now
have their own examples, and the list of builder types is linked from
the `SystemParamBuilder` trait. Add some examples to `FilteredEntityRef`
and `FilteredEntityMut` so that `QueryParamBuilder` can reference them.
# Objective
Fixes#15394
## Solution
Observers now validate params.
System registry has a new error variant for when system running fails
due to invalid parameters.
Run once now returns a `Result<Out, RunOnceError>` instead of `Out`.
This is more inline with system registry, which also returns a result.
I'll address warning messages in #15500.
## Testing
Added one test for each case.
---
## Migration Guide
- `RunSystemOnce::run_system_once` and
`RunSystemOnce::run_system_once_with` now return a `Result<Out>` instead
of just `Out`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zachary Harrold <zac@harrold.com.au>
# Objective
- Resolves#15453
## Solution
- Added new `World::resource_id` and `World::register_resource` methods
to support this feature
- Added new `ReflectResource::register_resource` method, and new pointer
to this new function
- Added new `ReflectComponent::register_component`
## Testing
- Tested this locally, but couldn't test the entire crate locally, just
this new feature, expect that CI will do the rest of the work.
---
## Showcase
```rs
#[derive(Component, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Component)]
struct MyComp;
let mut world = World::new();
let mut registry = TypeRegistration::of::<MyComp>();
registry.insert::<ReflectComponent>(FromType::<MyComp>::from_type());
let data = registry.data::<ReflectComponent>().unwrap();
// Its now possible to register the Component in the world this way
let component_id = data.register_component(&mut world);
// They will be the same
assert_eq!(component_id, world.component_id::<MyComp>().unwrap());
```
```rs
#[derive(Resource, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Resource)]
struct MyResource;
let mut world = World::new();
let mut registry = TypeRegistration::of::<MyResource>();
registry.insert::<ReflectResource>(FromType::<MyResource>::from_type());
let data = registry.data::<ReflectResource>().unwrap();
// Same with resources
let component_id = data.register_resource(&mut world);
// They match
assert_eq!(component_id, world.resource_id::<MyResource>().unwrap());
```
# Objective
Add the following system params:
- `QuerySingle<D, F>` - Valid if only one matching entity exists,
- `Option<QuerySingle<D, F>>` - Valid if zero or one matching entity
exists.
As @chescock pointed out, we don't need `Mut` variants.
Fixes: #15264
## Solution
Implement the type and both variants of system params.
Also implement `ReadOnlySystemParam` for readonly queries.
Added a new ECS example `fallible_params` which showcases `SingleQuery`
usage.
In the future we might want to add `NonEmptyQuery`,
`NonEmptyEventReader` and `Res` to it (or maybe just stop at mentioning
it).
## Testing
Tested with the example.
There is a lot of warning spam so we might want to implement #15391.
> [!NOTE]
> This is my first PR, so if something is incorrect
> or missing, please let me know :3
# Objective
- Clarifies `spawn`, `spawn_batch` and `ParallelCommands` docs about
performance and use cases
- Fixes#15472
## Solution
Add comments to `spawn`, `spawn_batch` and `ParallelCommands` to clarify
the
intended use case and link to other/better ways of doing spawning things
for
certain use cases.
## Objective
- Adopted #6396
## Solution
Same as #6396, we use a compile-time checked `StorageSwitch` union type
to select the fetch data based on the component's storage type, saving
>= 8 bytes per component fetch in a given query.
Note: We forego the Query iteration change as it exists in a slightly
different form now on main.
## Testing
- All current tests pass locally.
---------
Co-authored-by: james7132 <contact@jamessliu.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Russell <8494645+chescock@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#6370
- Closes#6581
## Solution
- Added the following lints to the workspace:
- `std_instead_of_core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core`
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [item level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Item%5C%3A)
to split all `use` statements into single items.
- Used `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features --fix
--allow-dirty` to _attempt_ to resolve the new linting issues, and
intervened where the lint was unable to resolve the issue automatically
(usually due to needing an `extern crate alloc;` statement in a crate
root).
- Manually removed certain uses of `std` where negative feature gating
prevented `--all-features` from finding the offending uses.
- Used `cargo +nightly fmt` with [crate level use
formatting](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/?version=v1.6.0&search=#Crate%5C%3A)
to re-merge all `use` statements matching Bevy's previous styling.
- Manually fixed cases where the `fmt` tool could not re-merge `use`
statements due to conditional compilation attributes.
## Testing
- Ran CI locally
## Migration Guide
The MSRV is now 1.81. Please update to this version or higher.
## Notes
- This is a _massive_ change to try and push through, which is why I've
outlined the semi-automatic steps I used to create this PR, in case this
fails and someone else tries again in the future.
- Making this change has no impact on user code, but does mean Bevy
contributors will be warned to use `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
where possible.
- This lint is a critical first step towards investigating `no_std`
options for Bevy.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
- Fixes#15451
## Migration Guide
- `World::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`.
- `World::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to
`register_component_with_descriptor`.
- `World::init_bundle` has been renamed to `register_bundle`.
- `Components::init_component` has been renamed to `register_component`.
- `Components::init_component_with_descriptor` has been renamed to
`register_component_with_descriptor`.
- `Components::init_resource` has been renamed to `register_resource`.
- `Components::init_non_send` had been renamed to `register_non_send`.
# Objective
Make it easier to debug why an entity doesn't match a query.
## Solution
List the entities components in `QueryEntityError::QueryDoesNotMatch`'s
message, e.g. `The query does not match the entity 0v1, which has
components foo::Bar, foo::Baz`.
This covers most cases as expected components are typically known and
filtering for change detection is rare when assessing a query by entity
id.
## Testing
Added a test confirming the new message matches the entity's components.
## Migration Guide
- `QueryEntityError` now has a lifetime. Convert it to a custom error if
you need to store it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: poopy <gonesbird@gmail.com>
# Objective
- #15331
## Solution
-Just changed it to Trigger since the function signature shows it's just
a wrapper trait
## Testing
Will let tests pass
---------
Co-authored-by: Fernan Lukban <fernanlukban@gmail.co>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antony <antony.m.3012@gmail.com>
# Objective
- Add a test case for #14300Fixes#14300
## Solution
`SceneEntityMapper` relies on operations on `Entities` that require
flushing in advance, such as `alloc` and `free`. Previously, it wasn't
calling `world.flush_entities()` itself and relied on its caller having
flushed beforehand. This wasn't an issue before observers and hooks were
released, since entity reservation was happening at expected times. Now
that hooks and observers are a thing, they can introduce a need to
flush.
We have a few options:
* Flush after each observer/hook run
* Flush between each paired observer/hook and operation that requires a
flush
* Flush before operations requiring it
The first option for this case seemed trickier to reason about than I
wanted, since it involved the `BundleInserter` and its
`UnsafeWorldCell`, and the second is generally harder to track down. The
third seemed the most straightforward and conventional, since we can see
a flush occurring at the start of a number of `World` methods.
Therefore, we're letting `SceneEntityMapper` be in charge of upholding
its own invariants and calling `flush_entities` when it's created.
## Testing
Added a new test case modeled after #14300
# Objective
- Fixes#15373
- Fixes
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/14920#issuecomment-2370428013
## Solution
- Make `IntoSystem::pipe` and `IntoSystem::map` return two new
(possibly-ZST) types that implement `IntoSystem` and whose `into_system`
method return the systems that were previously being returned by
`IntoSystem::pipe` and `IntoSystem::map`
- Don't eagerly call `IntoSystem::into_system` on the argument given to
`RunSystemCachedWith::new` to avoid losing its ZST-ness
## Testing
- Added a regression test for each issue
## Migration Guide
- `IntoSystem::pipe` and `IntoSystem::map` now return `IntoPipeSystem`
and `IntoAdapterSystem` instead of `PipeSystem` and `AdapterSystem`.
Most notably these types don't implement `System` but rather only
`IntoSystem`.
# Objective
Fixes#14467
Observers and component lifecycle hooks are allowed to perform
operations that subsequently require `Entities` to be flushed, such as
reserving a new entity. If this occurs during an `on_remove` hook or an
`OnRemove` event trigger during an `EntityWorldMut::despawn`, a panic
will occur.
## Solution
Call `world.flush_entities()` after running `on_remove` hooks/observers
during `despawn`
## Testing
Added a new test that fails before the fix and succeeds afterward.
# Objective
Fix "system skipped" warnings when validation fails on systems that
wouldn't run because of run conditions.
## Solution
> I think the error is from a system defined as:
>
> ```rust
> no_gpu_preprocessing::batch_and_prepare_sorted_render_phase::<SPI,
GFBD>
> .run_if(resource_exists::<BatchedInstanceBuffer<GFBD::BufferData>>),
> ```
>
> So the `run_if` was preventing the panics. Maybe we need to skip
validation if `!system_conditions_met`, or at least silence the warning
in that case.
*By @chescock in
https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/692572690833473578/1287865365312831562*
Validation of system is skipped if the system was already skipped by run
conditions.
## Testing
Ran alien addict example, no more warnings.
# Objective
Fixes#14331
## Solution
- Make `Traversal` a subtrait of `ReadOnlyQueryData`
- Update implementations and usages
## Testing
- Updated unit tests
## Migration Guide
Update implementations of `Traversal`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <9044780+ItsDoot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Objective
Currently, the term "value" in the context of reflection is a bit
overloaded.
For one, it can be used synonymously with "data" or "variable". An
example sentence would be "this function takes a reflected value".
However, it is also used to refer to reflected types which are
`ReflectKind::Value`. These types are usually either primitives, opaque
types, or types that don't fall into any other `ReflectKind` (or perhaps
could, but don't due to some limitation/difficulty). An example sentence
would be "this function takes a reflected value type".
This makes it difficult to write good documentation or other learning
material without causing some amount of confusion to readers. Ideally,
we'd be able to move away from the `ReflectKind::Value` usage and come
up with a better term.
## Solution
This PR replaces the terminology of "value" with "opaque" across
`bevy_reflect`. This includes in documentation, type names, variant
names, and macros.
The term "opaque" was chosen because that's essentially how the type is
treated within the reflection API. In other words, its internal
structure is hidden. All we can do is work with the type itself.
### Primitives
While primitives are not technically opaque types, I think it's still
clearer to refer to them as "opaque" rather than keep the confusing
"value" terminology.
We could consider adding another concept for primitives (e.g.
`ReflectKind::Primitive`), but I'm not sure that provides a lot of
benefit right now. In most circumstances, they'll be treated just like
an opaque type. They would also likely use the same macro (or two copies
of the same macro but with different names).
## Testing
You can test locally by running:
```
cargo test --package bevy_reflect --all-features
```
---
## Migration Guide
The reflection concept of "value type" has been replaced with a clearer
"opaque type". The following renames have been made to account for this:
- `ReflectKind::Value` → `ReflectKind::Opaque`
- `ReflectRef::Value` → `ReflectRef::Opaque`
- `ReflectMut::Value` → `ReflectMut::Opaque`
- `ReflectOwned::Value` → `ReflectOwned::Opaque`
- `TypeInfo::Value` → `TypeInfo::Opaque`
- `ValueInfo` → `OpaqueInfo`
- `impl_reflect_value!` → `impl_reflect_opaque!`
- `impl_from_reflect_value!` → `impl_from_reflect_opaque!`
Additionally, declaring your own opaque types no longer uses
`#[reflect_value]`. This attribute has been replaced by
`#[reflect(opaque)]`:
```rust
// BEFORE
#[derive(Reflect)]
#[reflect_value(Default)]
struct MyOpaqueType(u32);
// AFTER
#[derive(Reflect)]
#[reflect(opaque)]
#[reflect(Default)]
struct MyOpaqueType(u32);
```
Note that the order in which `#[reflect(opaque)]` appears does not
matter.
# Objective
- Fixes#14924
- Closes#9584
## Solution
- We introduce a new trait, `SystemInput`, that serves as a type
function from the `'static` form of the input, to its lifetime'd
version, similarly to `SystemParam` or `WorldQuery`.
- System functions now take the lifetime'd wrapped version,
`SystemInput::Param<'_>`, which prevents the issue presented in #14924
(i.e. `InRef<T>`).
- Functions for running systems now take the lifetime'd unwrapped
version, `SystemInput::Inner<'_>` (i.e. `&T`).
- Due to the above change, system piping had to be re-implemented as a
standalone type, rather than `CombinatorSystem` as it was previously.
- Removes the `Trigger<'static, E, B>` transmute in observer runner
code.
## Testing
- All current tests pass.
- Added additional tests and doc-tests.
---
## Showcase
```rust
let mut world = World::new();
let mut value = 2;
// Currently possible:
fn square(In(input): In<usize>) -> usize {
input * input
}
value = world.run_system_once_with(value, square);
// Now possible:
fn square_mut(InMut(input): InMut<usize>) {
*input *= *input;
}
world.run_system_once_with(&mut value, square_mut);
// Or:
fn square_ref(InRef(input): InRef<usize>) -> usize {
*input * *input
}
value = world.run_system_once_with(&value, square_ref);
```
## Migration Guide
- All current explicit usages of the following types must be changed in
the way specified:
- `SystemId<I, O>` to `SystemId<In<I>, O>`
- `System<In = T>` to `System<In = In<T>>`
- `IntoSystem<I, O, M>` to `IntoSystem<In<I>, O, M>`
- `Condition<M, T>` to `Condition<M, In<T>>`
- `In<Trigger<E, B>>` is no longer a valid input parameter type. Use
`Trigger<E, B>` directly, instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giacomo Stevanato <giaco.stevanato@gmail.com>
# Objective
Fixes#15351
## Solution
- Created new external crate and ported over the code
## Testing
- CI
## Migration guide
Replace references to `bevy_utils::ShortName` with
`disqualified::ShortName`.
Currently, Bevy restricts animation clips to animating
`Transform::translation`, `Transform::rotation`, `Transform::scale`, or
`MorphWeights`, which correspond to the properties that glTF can
animate. This is insufficient for many use cases such as animating UI,
as the UI layout systems expect to have exclusive control over UI
elements' `Transform`s and therefore the `Style` properties must be
animated instead.
This commit fixes this, allowing for `AnimationClip`s to animate
arbitrary properties. The `Keyframes` structure has been turned into a
low-level trait that can be implemented to achieve arbitrary animation
behavior. Along with `Keyframes`, this patch adds a higher-level trait,
`AnimatableProperty`, that simplifies the task of animating single
interpolable properties. Built-in `Keyframes` implementations exist for
translation, rotation, scale, and morph weights. For the most part, you
can migrate by simply changing your code from
`Keyframes::Translation(...)` to `TranslationKeyframes(...)`, and
likewise for rotation, scale, and morph weights.
An example `AnimatableProperty` implementation for the font size of a
text section follows:
#[derive(Reflect)]
struct FontSizeProperty;
impl AnimatableProperty for FontSizeProperty {
type Component = Text;
type Property = f32;
fn get_mut(component: &mut Self::Component) -> Option<&mut
Self::Property> {
Some(&mut component.sections.get_mut(0)?.style.font_size)
}
}
In order to keep this patch relatively small, this patch doesn't include
an implementation of `AnimatableProperty` on top of the reflection
system. That can be a follow-up.
This patch builds on top of the new `EntityMutExcept<>` type in order to
widen the `AnimationTarget` query to include write access to all
components. Because `EntityMutExcept<>` has some performance overhead
over an explicit query, we continue to explicitly query `Transform` in
order to avoid regressing the performance of skeletal animation, such as
the `many_foxes` benchmark. I've measured the performance of that
benchmark and have found no significant regressions.
A new example, `animated_ui`, has been added. This example shows how to
use Bevy's built-in animation infrastructure to animate font size and
color, which wasn't possible before this patch.
## Showcase
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fa73492-a9ce-405a-a8f2-4aacd7f6dc97
## Migration Guide
* Animation keyframes are now an extensible trait, not an enum. Replace
`Keyframes::Translation(...)`, `Keyframes::Scale(...)`,
`Keyframes::Rotation(...)`, and `Keyframes::Weights(...)` with
`Box::new(TranslationKeyframes(...))`, `Box::new(ScaleKeyframes(...))`,
`Box::new(RotationKeyframes(...))`, and
`Box::new(MorphWeightsKeyframes(...))` respectively.
# Objective
The goal of this PR is to introduce `SystemParam` validation in order to
reduce runtime panics.
Fixes#15265
## Solution
`SystemParam` now has a new method `validate_param(...) -> bool`, which
takes immutable variants of `get_param` arguments. The returned value
indicates whether the parameter can be acquired from the world. If
parameters cannot be acquired for a system, it won't be executed,
similarly to run conditions. This reduces panics when using params like
`Res`, `ResMut`, etc. as well as allows for new, ergonomic params like
#15264 or #15302.
Param validation happens at the level of executors. All validation
happens directly before executing a system, in case of normal systems
they are skipped, in case of conditions they return false.
Warning about system skipping is primitive and subject to change in
subsequent PRs.
## Testing
Two executor tests check that all executors:
- skip systems which have invalid parameters:
- piped systems get skipped together,
- dependent systems still run correctly,
- skip systems with invalid run conditions:
- system conditions have invalid parameters,
- system set conditions have invalid parameters.
# Objective
Working with `World` is painful due to lifetime issues and a lack of
ergonomics, so you may want to delegate to the system API. Your current
options are:
- `world.run_system_once`, which initializes the system each time it's
called (performance cost) and doesn't support `Local`. The docs
recommend users not use this method outside of diagnostic use cases like
unit tests.
- `world.run_system`, which requires you to register the system and
store the `SystemId` somewhere (made easier by implementing `FromWorld`
for a newtyped `Local`, unless you're in e.g. a custom `Command` impl).
These options work, but you're choosing between a performance cost and
an ergonomic challenge.
## Solution
Provide a cached `run_system` API that accepts an `S: IntoSystem` and
checks for a `CachedSystemId<S::System>(SystemId)` resource. If it
doesn't exist, it will register the system and save its `SystemId` in
that resource.
In other words, it hides the "save the `SystemId` in a `Local` or
`Resource`" pattern as an implementation detail.
Prior work: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/10469.
## Testing
This approach worked in a proof-of-concept:
b34ee29531/src/util/patch/run_system_cached.rs (L35).
A new unit test was added and it passes in CI.
# Objective
- Goal is to minimize bevy_utils #11478
## Solution
- Move the file short_name wholesale into bevy_reflect
## Testing
- Unit tests
- CI
## Migration Guide
- References to `bevy_utils::ShortName` should instead now be
`bevy_reflect::ShortName`.
---------
Co-authored-by: François Mockers <francois.mockers@vleue.com>
# Objective
Closes#11825
## Solution
Change return type of `get_resource_ref` and `resource_ref` from `Res`
to `Ref` and implement `From Res<T> for Ref<T>`.
# Objective
> Rust 1.81 released the #[expect(...)] attribute, which works like
#[allow(...)] but throws a warning if the lint isn't raised. This is
preferred to #[allow(...)] because it tells us when it can be removed.
- Adopts the parts of #15118 that are complete, and updates the branch
so it can be merged.
- There were a few conflicts, let me know if I misjudged any of 'em.
Alice's
[recommendation](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/15059#issuecomment-2349263900)
seems well-taken, let's do this crate by crate now that @BD103 has done
the lion's share of this!
(Relates to, but doesn't yet completely finish #15059.)
Crates this _doesn't_ cover:
- bevy_input
- bevy_gilrs
- bevy_window
- bevy_winit
- bevy_state
- bevy_render
- bevy_picking
- bevy_core_pipeline
- bevy_sprite
- bevy_text
- bevy_pbr
- bevy_ui
- bevy_gltf
- bevy_gizmos
- bevy_dev_tools
- bevy_internal
- bevy_dylib
---------
Co-authored-by: BD103 <59022059+BD103@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Frankel <ben.frankel7@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antony <antony.m.3012@gmail.com>
No hard feelings if you don't want to make this change. This is just
something I stumbled over in my very first read of the `bevy_ecs` crate.
# Objective
- the general goal here is to improve DX slightly
- make the code easier to read in general. The previous names make the
code harder to read, especially since they are so similar.
## Solution
- choose more specific names for the fields
- `index_iter` -> `freelist_indices` : "freelist" is a well established
term in the rest of the docs in this module, so we might want to reuse
it
- `index_range` -> `new_indices` : Nothing besides the doc comment
stated that these indices were actually new/fresh
## Testing
Note that the fields are private so that this is no breaking change.
They are also only used in this one module.
# Objective
- The multithreaded executor has some weird UB related to stacked
borrows and async blocks
- See my explanation on discord
https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/749335865876021248/1286359267921887232
- Closes#15296 (can this be used to close PRs?)
## Solution
- Don't create a `&mut World` reference outside `async` blocks and then
capture it, but instead directly create it inside the `async` blocks.
This avoids it being captured, which has some weird requirement on its
validity.
## Testing
- Added a regression test
# Objective
- I was running miri locally to check the UB in #15276 and it detected
an unrelated memory leak, due to the `RawCommandQueue` changes. (I
probably should have turned the leak detection off because we do
purposely leak interned string labels and I assume that's why CI didn't
detect it.)
## Solution
- The memory allocated to `RawCommandQueue` needs to be manually
dropped. This was being done for `bytes` and `cursor`, but was missed
for `panic_recovery`.
## Testing
- Ran miri locally and the related memory leaks errors when away.
