bevy/crates/bevy_input/src/touch.rs

552 lines
18 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

//! The touch input functionality.
use bevy_ecs::event::{Event, EventReader};
Make `Resource` trait opt-in, requiring `#[derive(Resource)]` V2 (#5577) *This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.* # Objective Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds. While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks: * it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource * it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource * we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component). * dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways * raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values * we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor ## Notes to reviewers * Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits. *ira: My commits are not as well organized :')* * I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does. * I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981. ## Changelog `Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro. ## Migration Guide Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource. If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics. `ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing. Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead. Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-08-08 21:36:35 +00:00
use bevy_ecs::system::{ResMut, Resource};
use bevy_math::Vec2;
bevy_reflect: `FromReflect` Ergonomics Implementation (#6056) # Objective **This implementation is based on https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59.** --- Resolves #4597 Full details and motivation can be found in the RFC, but here's a brief summary. `FromReflect` is a very powerful and important trait within the reflection API. It allows Dynamic types (e.g., `DynamicList`, etc.) to be formed into Real ones (e.g., `Vec<i32>`, etc.). This mainly comes into play concerning deserialization, where the reflection deserializers both return a `Box<dyn Reflect>` that almost always contain one of these Dynamic representations of a Real type. To convert this to our Real type, we need to use `FromReflect`. It also sneaks up in other ways. For example, it's a required bound for `T` in `Vec<T>` so that `Vec<T>` as a whole can be made `FromReflect`. It's also required by all fields of an enum as it's used as part of the `Reflect::apply` implementation. So in other words, much like `GetTypeRegistration` and `Typed`, it is very much a core reflection trait. The problem is that it is not currently treated like a core trait and is not automatically derived alongside `Reflect`. This makes using it a bit cumbersome and easy to forget. ## Solution Automatically derive `FromReflect` when deriving `Reflect`. Users can then choose to opt-out if needed using the `#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]` attribute. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Bar; fn test<T: FromReflect>(value: T) {} test(Foo); // <-- OK test(Bar); // <-- Panic! Bar does not implement trait `FromReflect` ``` #### `ReflectFromReflect` This PR also automatically adds the `ReflectFromReflect` (introduced in #6245) registration to the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl— if the type hasn't opted out of `FromReflect` of course. <details> <summary><h4>Improved Deserialization</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. And since we can do all the above, we might as well improve deserialization. We can now choose to deserialize into a Dynamic type or automatically convert it using `FromReflect` under the hood. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new` will now perform the conversion and return the `Box`'d Real type. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` will work like what we have now and simply return the `Box`'d Dynamic type. ```rust // Returns the Real type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // Returns the Dynamic type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` </details> --- ## Changelog * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro * This includes auto-registering `ReflectFromReflect` in the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl * ~~Renamed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic`, respectively~~ **Descoped** * ~~Changed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to automatically convert the deserialized output using `FromReflect`~~ **Descoped** ## Migration Guide * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro. Items with both derives will need to remove the `FromReflect` one. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)] struct Foo; // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; ``` If using a manual implementation of `FromReflect` and the `Reflect` derive, users will need to opt-out of the automatic implementation. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} ``` <details> <summary><h4>Removed Migrations</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. * The reflect deserializers now perform a `FromReflect` conversion internally. The expected output of `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` is no longer a Dynamic (e.g., `DynamicList`), but its Real counterpart (e.g., `Vec<i32>`). ```rust let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; // OLD let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // NEW let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` Alternatively, if this behavior isn't desired, use the `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` methods instead: ```rust // OLD let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); // NEW let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); ``` </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-29 01:31:34 +00:00
use bevy_reflect::Reflect;
use bevy_utils::HashMap;
Derive `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for input types (#6232) # Objective Adds support for reflecting many more of the input types. This allows those types to be used via scripting, `bevy-inspector-egui`, etc. These types are registered by the `InputPlugin` so that they're automatically available to anyone who wants to use them Closes #6223 ## Solution Many types now have `#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]` added to them in `bevy_input`. Additionally, `#[reflect(traits...)]` has been added for applicable traits to the types. This PR does not add reflection support for types which have private fields. Notably, `Touch` and `Touches` don't implement `Reflect`/`FromReflect`. This adds the "glam" feature to the `bevy_reflect` dependency for package `bevy_input`. Since `bevy_input` transitively depends on `glam` already, all this brings in are the reflection `impl`s. ## Migration Guide - `Input<T>` now implements `Reflect` via `#[reflect]` instead of `#[reflect_value]`. This means it now exposes its private fields via the `Reflect` trait rather than being treated as a value type. For code that relies on the `Input<T>` struct being treated as a value type by reflection, it is still possible to wrap the `Input<T>` type with a wrapper struct and apply `#[reflect_value]` to it. - As a reminder, private fields exposed via reflection are not subject to any stability guarantees. --- ## Changelog Added - Implemented `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for many input-related types. These types are automatically registered when adding the `InputPlugin`.
2022-10-26 19:52:20 +00:00
#[cfg(feature = "serialize")]
use bevy_reflect::{ReflectDeserialize, ReflectSerialize};
/// A touch input event.
///
/// ## Logic
///
/// Every time the user touches the screen, a new [`TouchPhase::Started`] event with an unique
/// identifier for the finger is generated. When the finger is lifted, the [`TouchPhase::Ended`]
/// event is generated with the same finger id.
///
/// After a [`TouchPhase::Started`] event has been emitted, there may be zero or more [`TouchPhase::Moved`]
/// events when the finger is moved or the touch pressure changes.
///
/// The finger id may be reused by the system after an [`TouchPhase::Ended`] event. The user
/// should assume that a new [`TouchPhase::Started`] event received with the same id has nothing
/// to do with the old finger and is a new finger.
///
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
/// A [`TouchPhase::Canceled`] event is emitted when the system has canceled tracking this
/// touch, such as when the window loses focus, or on iOS if the user moves the
/// device against their face.
///
/// ## Note
///
/// This event is the translated version of the `WindowEvent::Touch` from the `winit` crate.
/// It is available to the end user and can be used for game logic.
bevy_reflect: `FromReflect` Ergonomics Implementation (#6056) # Objective **This implementation is based on https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59.** --- Resolves #4597 Full details and motivation can be found in the RFC, but here's a brief summary. `FromReflect` is a very powerful and important trait within the reflection API. It allows Dynamic types (e.g., `DynamicList`, etc.) to be formed into Real ones (e.g., `Vec<i32>`, etc.). This mainly comes into play concerning deserialization, where the reflection deserializers both return a `Box<dyn Reflect>` that almost always contain one of these Dynamic representations of a Real type. To convert this to our Real type, we need to use `FromReflect`. It also sneaks up in other ways. For example, it's a required bound for `T` in `Vec<T>` so that `Vec<T>` as a whole can be made `FromReflect`. It's also required by all fields of an enum as it's used as part of the `Reflect::apply` implementation. So in other words, much like `GetTypeRegistration` and `Typed`, it is very much a core reflection trait. The problem is that it is not currently treated like a core trait and is not automatically derived alongside `Reflect`. This makes using it a bit cumbersome and easy to forget. ## Solution Automatically derive `FromReflect` when deriving `Reflect`. Users can then choose to opt-out if needed using the `#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]` attribute. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Bar; fn test<T: FromReflect>(value: T) {} test(Foo); // <-- OK test(Bar); // <-- Panic! Bar does not implement trait `FromReflect` ``` #### `ReflectFromReflect` This PR also automatically adds the `ReflectFromReflect` (introduced in #6245) registration to the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl— if the type hasn't opted out of `FromReflect` of course. <details> <summary><h4>Improved Deserialization</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. And since we can do all the above, we might as well improve deserialization. We can now choose to deserialize into a Dynamic type or automatically convert it using `FromReflect` under the hood. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new` will now perform the conversion and return the `Box`'d Real type. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` will work like what we have now and simply return the `Box`'d Dynamic type. ```rust // Returns the Real type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // Returns the Dynamic type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` </details> --- ## Changelog * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro * This includes auto-registering `ReflectFromReflect` in the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl * ~~Renamed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic`, respectively~~ **Descoped** * ~~Changed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to automatically convert the deserialized output using `FromReflect`~~ **Descoped** ## Migration Guide * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro. Items with both derives will need to remove the `FromReflect` one. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)] struct Foo; // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; ``` If using a manual implementation of `FromReflect` and the `Reflect` derive, users will need to opt-out of the automatic implementation. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} ``` <details> <summary><h4>Removed Migrations</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. * The reflect deserializers now perform a `FromReflect` conversion internally. The expected output of `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` is no longer a Dynamic (e.g., `DynamicList`), but its Real counterpart (e.g., `Vec<i32>`). ```rust let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; // OLD let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // NEW let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` Alternatively, if this behavior isn't desired, use the `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` methods instead: ```rust // OLD let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); // NEW let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); ``` </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-29 01:31:34 +00:00
#[derive(Event, Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Debug, PartialEq)]
Derive `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for input types (#6232) # Objective Adds support for reflecting many more of the input types. This allows those types to be used via scripting, `bevy-inspector-egui`, etc. These types are registered by the `InputPlugin` so that they're automatically available to anyone who wants to use them Closes #6223 ## Solution Many types now have `#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]` added to them in `bevy_input`. Additionally, `#[reflect(traits...)]` has been added for applicable traits to the types. This PR does not add reflection support for types which have private fields. Notably, `Touch` and `Touches` don't implement `Reflect`/`FromReflect`. This adds the "glam" feature to the `bevy_reflect` dependency for package `bevy_input`. Since `bevy_input` transitively depends on `glam` already, all this brings in are the reflection `impl`s. ## Migration Guide - `Input<T>` now implements `Reflect` via `#[reflect]` instead of `#[reflect_value]`. This means it now exposes its private fields via the `Reflect` trait rather than being treated as a value type. For code that relies on the `Input<T>` struct being treated as a value type by reflection, it is still possible to wrap the `Input<T>` type with a wrapper struct and apply `#[reflect_value]` to it. - As a reminder, private fields exposed via reflection are not subject to any stability guarantees. --- ## Changelog Added - Implemented `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for many input-related types. These types are automatically registered when adding the `InputPlugin`.
2022-10-26 19:52:20 +00:00
#[cfg_attr(
feature = "serialize",
derive(serde::Serialize, serde::Deserialize),
reflect(Serialize, Deserialize)
)]
pub struct TouchInput {
/// The phase of the touch input.
pub phase: TouchPhase,
/// The position of the finger on the touchscreen.
pub position: Vec2,
/// Describes how hard the screen was pressed.
///
/// May be [`None`] if the platform does not support pressure sensitivity.
/// This feature is only available on **iOS** 9.0+ and **Windows** 8+.
pub force: Option<ForceTouch>,
/// The unique identifier of the finger.
pub id: u64,
}
/// A force description of a [`Touch`](crate::touch::Touch) input.
bevy_reflect: `FromReflect` Ergonomics Implementation (#6056) # Objective **This implementation is based on https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59.** --- Resolves #4597 Full details and motivation can be found in the RFC, but here's a brief summary. `FromReflect` is a very powerful and important trait within the reflection API. It allows Dynamic types (e.g., `DynamicList`, etc.) to be formed into Real ones (e.g., `Vec<i32>`, etc.). This mainly comes into play concerning deserialization, where the reflection deserializers both return a `Box<dyn Reflect>` that almost always contain one of these Dynamic representations of a Real type. To convert this to our Real type, we need to use `FromReflect`. It also sneaks up in other ways. For example, it's a required bound for `T` in `Vec<T>` so that `Vec<T>` as a whole can be made `FromReflect`. It's also required by all fields of an enum as it's used as part of the `Reflect::apply` implementation. So in other words, much like `GetTypeRegistration` and `Typed`, it is very much a core reflection trait. The problem is that it is not currently treated like a core trait and is not automatically derived alongside `Reflect`. This makes using it a bit cumbersome and easy to forget. ## Solution Automatically derive `FromReflect` when deriving `Reflect`. Users can then choose to opt-out if needed using the `#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]` attribute. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Bar; fn test<T: FromReflect>(value: T) {} test(Foo); // <-- OK test(Bar); // <-- Panic! Bar does not implement trait `FromReflect` ``` #### `ReflectFromReflect` This PR also automatically adds the `ReflectFromReflect` (introduced in #6245) registration to the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl— if the type hasn't opted out of `FromReflect` of course. <details> <summary><h4>Improved Deserialization</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. And since we can do all the above, we might as well improve deserialization. We can now choose to deserialize into a Dynamic type or automatically convert it using `FromReflect` under the hood. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new` will now perform the conversion and return the `Box`'d Real type. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` will work like what we have now and simply return the `Box`'d Dynamic type. ```rust // Returns the Real type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // Returns the Dynamic type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` </details> --- ## Changelog * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro * This includes auto-registering `ReflectFromReflect` in the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl * ~~Renamed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic`, respectively~~ **Descoped** * ~~Changed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to automatically convert the deserialized output using `FromReflect`~~ **Descoped** ## Migration Guide * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro. Items with both derives will need to remove the `FromReflect` one. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)] struct Foo; // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; ``` If using a manual implementation of `FromReflect` and the `Reflect` derive, users will need to opt-out of the automatic implementation. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} ``` <details> <summary><h4>Removed Migrations</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. * The reflect deserializers now perform a `FromReflect` conversion internally. The expected output of `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` is no longer a Dynamic (e.g., `DynamicList`), but its Real counterpart (e.g., `Vec<i32>`). ```rust let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; // OLD let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // NEW let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` Alternatively, if this behavior isn't desired, use the `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` methods instead: ```rust // OLD let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); // NEW let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); ``` </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-29 01:31:34 +00:00
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Debug, PartialEq)]
Derive `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for input types (#6232) # Objective Adds support for reflecting many more of the input types. This allows those types to be used via scripting, `bevy-inspector-egui`, etc. These types are registered by the `InputPlugin` so that they're automatically available to anyone who wants to use them Closes #6223 ## Solution Many types now have `#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]` added to them in `bevy_input`. Additionally, `#[reflect(traits...)]` has been added for applicable traits to the types. This PR does not add reflection support for types which have private fields. Notably, `Touch` and `Touches` don't implement `Reflect`/`FromReflect`. This adds the "glam" feature to the `bevy_reflect` dependency for package `bevy_input`. Since `bevy_input` transitively depends on `glam` already, all this brings in are the reflection `impl`s. ## Migration Guide - `Input<T>` now implements `Reflect` via `#[reflect]` instead of `#[reflect_value]`. This means it now exposes its private fields via the `Reflect` trait rather than being treated as a value type. For code that relies on the `Input<T>` struct being treated as a value type by reflection, it is still possible to wrap the `Input<T>` type with a wrapper struct and apply `#[reflect_value]` to it. - As a reminder, private fields exposed via reflection are not subject to any stability guarantees. --- ## Changelog Added - Implemented `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for many input-related types. These types are automatically registered when adding the `InputPlugin`.
2022-10-26 19:52:20 +00:00
#[cfg_attr(
feature = "serialize",
derive(serde::Serialize, serde::Deserialize),
reflect(Serialize, Deserialize)
)]
pub enum ForceTouch {
/// On iOS, the force is calibrated so that the same number corresponds to
/// roughly the same amount of pressure on the screen regardless of the
/// device.
Calibrated {
/// The force of the touch, where a value of 1.0 represents the force of
/// an average touch (predetermined by the system, not user-specific).
///
/// The force reported by Apple Pencil is measured along the axis of the
/// pencil. If you want a force perpendicular to the device, you need to
/// calculate this value using the `altitude_angle` value.
force: f64,
/// The maximum possible force for a touch.
///
/// The value of this field is sufficiently high to provide a wide
/// dynamic range for values of the `force` field.
max_possible_force: f64,
/// The altitude (in radians) of the stylus.
///
/// A value of 0 radians indicates that the stylus is parallel to the
/// surface. The value of this property is Pi/2 when the stylus is
/// perpendicular to the surface.
altitude_angle: Option<f64>,
},
/// If the platform reports the force as normalized, we have no way of
/// knowing how much pressure 1.0 corresponds to we know it's the maximum
/// amount of force, but as to how much force, you might either have to
/// press really hard, or not hard at all, depending on the device.
Normalized(f64),
}
/// A phase of a [`TouchInput`](crate::touch::TouchInput).
///
/// ## Usage
///
/// It is used to describe the phase of the touch input that is currently active.
/// This includes a phase that indicates that a touch input has started or ended,
/// or that a finger has moved. There is also a canceled phase that indicates that
/// the system canceled the tracking of the finger.
bevy_reflect: `FromReflect` Ergonomics Implementation (#6056) # Objective **This implementation is based on https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/pull/59.** --- Resolves #4597 Full details and motivation can be found in the RFC, but here's a brief summary. `FromReflect` is a very powerful and important trait within the reflection API. It allows Dynamic types (e.g., `DynamicList`, etc.) to be formed into Real ones (e.g., `Vec<i32>`, etc.). This mainly comes into play concerning deserialization, where the reflection deserializers both return a `Box<dyn Reflect>` that almost always contain one of these Dynamic representations of a Real type. To convert this to our Real type, we need to use `FromReflect`. It also sneaks up in other ways. For example, it's a required bound for `T` in `Vec<T>` so that `Vec<T>` as a whole can be made `FromReflect`. It's also required by all fields of an enum as it's used as part of the `Reflect::apply` implementation. So in other words, much like `GetTypeRegistration` and `Typed`, it is very much a core reflection trait. The problem is that it is not currently treated like a core trait and is not automatically derived alongside `Reflect`. This makes using it a bit cumbersome and easy to forget. ## Solution Automatically derive `FromReflect` when deriving `Reflect`. Users can then choose to opt-out if needed using the `#[reflect(from_reflect = false)]` attribute. ```rust #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Bar; fn test<T: FromReflect>(value: T) {} test(Foo); // <-- OK test(Bar); // <-- Panic! Bar does not implement trait `FromReflect` ``` #### `ReflectFromReflect` This PR also automatically adds the `ReflectFromReflect` (introduced in #6245) registration to the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl— if the type hasn't opted out of `FromReflect` of course. <details> <summary><h4>Improved Deserialization</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. And since we can do all the above, we might as well improve deserialization. We can now choose to deserialize into a Dynamic type or automatically convert it using `FromReflect` under the hood. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new` will now perform the conversion and return the `Box`'d Real type. `[Un]TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` will work like what we have now and simply return the `Box`'d Dynamic type. ```rust // Returns the Real type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // Returns the Dynamic type let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` </details> --- ## Changelog * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro * This includes auto-registering `ReflectFromReflect` in the derived `GetTypeRegistration` impl * ~~Renamed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic`, respectively~~ **Descoped** * ~~Changed `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` to automatically convert the deserialized output using `FromReflect`~~ **Descoped** ## Migration Guide * `FromReflect` is now automatically derived within the `Reflect` derive macro. Items with both derives will need to remove the `FromReflect` one. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)] struct Foo; // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; ``` If using a manual implementation of `FromReflect` and the `Reflect` derive, users will need to opt-out of the automatic implementation. ```rust // OLD #[derive(Reflect)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} // NEW #[derive(Reflect)] #[reflect(from_reflect = false)] struct Foo; impl FromReflect for Foo {/* ... */} ``` <details> <summary><h4>Removed Migrations</h4></summary> > **Warning** > This section includes changes that have since been descoped from this PR. They will likely be implemented again in a followup PR. I am mainly leaving these details in for archival purposes, as well as for reference when implementing this logic again. * The reflect deserializers now perform a `FromReflect` conversion internally. The expected output of `TypedReflectDeserializer::new` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new` is no longer a Dynamic (e.g., `DynamicList`), but its Real counterpart (e.g., `Vec<i32>`). ```rust let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); let mut deserializer = ron::de::Deserializer::from_str(input)?; // OLD let output: DynamicStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; // NEW let output: SomeStruct = reflect_deserializer.deserialize(&mut deserializer)?.take()?; ``` Alternatively, if this behavior isn't desired, use the `TypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` and `UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic` methods instead: ```rust // OLD let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new(&registry); // NEW let reflect_deserializer = UntypedReflectDeserializer::new_dynamic(&registry); ``` </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2023-06-29 01:31:34 +00:00
#[derive(Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Reflect)]
#[reflect(Debug, Hash, PartialEq)]
Derive `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for input types (#6232) # Objective Adds support for reflecting many more of the input types. This allows those types to be used via scripting, `bevy-inspector-egui`, etc. These types are registered by the `InputPlugin` so that they're automatically available to anyone who wants to use them Closes #6223 ## Solution Many types now have `#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]` added to them in `bevy_input`. Additionally, `#[reflect(traits...)]` has been added for applicable traits to the types. This PR does not add reflection support for types which have private fields. Notably, `Touch` and `Touches` don't implement `Reflect`/`FromReflect`. This adds the "glam" feature to the `bevy_reflect` dependency for package `bevy_input`. Since `bevy_input` transitively depends on `glam` already, all this brings in are the reflection `impl`s. ## Migration Guide - `Input<T>` now implements `Reflect` via `#[reflect]` instead of `#[reflect_value]`. This means it now exposes its private fields via the `Reflect` trait rather than being treated as a value type. For code that relies on the `Input<T>` struct being treated as a value type by reflection, it is still possible to wrap the `Input<T>` type with a wrapper struct and apply `#[reflect_value]` to it. - As a reminder, private fields exposed via reflection are not subject to any stability guarantees. --- ## Changelog Added - Implemented `Reflect` + `FromReflect` for many input-related types. These types are automatically registered when adding the `InputPlugin`.
2022-10-26 19:52:20 +00:00
#[cfg_attr(
feature = "serialize",
derive(serde::Serialize, serde::Deserialize),
reflect(Serialize, Deserialize)
)]
pub enum TouchPhase {
/// A finger started to touch the touchscreen.
Started,
/// A finger moved over the touchscreen.
Moved,
/// A finger stopped touching the touchscreen.
Ended,
/// The system canceled the tracking of the finger.
///
/// This occurs when the window loses focus, or on iOS if the user moves the
/// device against their face.
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
Canceled,
}
/// A touch input.
///
/// ## Usage
///
/// It is used to store the position and force of a touch input and also the `id` of the finger.
/// The data of the touch input comes from the [`TouchInput`] event and is being stored
/// inside of the [`Touches`] `bevy` resource.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
pub struct Touch {
/// The id of the touch input.
id: u64,
/// The starting position of the touch input.
start_position: Vec2,
/// The starting force of the touch input.
start_force: Option<ForceTouch>,
/// The previous position of the touch input.
previous_position: Vec2,
/// The previous force of the touch input.
previous_force: Option<ForceTouch>,
/// The current position of the touch input.
position: Vec2,
/// The current force of the touch input.
force: Option<ForceTouch>,
}
impl Touch {
/// The delta of the current `position` and the `previous_position`.
pub fn delta(&self) -> Vec2 {
self.position - self.previous_position
}
/// The distance of the `start_position` and the current `position`.
pub fn distance(&self) -> Vec2 {
self.position - self.start_position
}
/// Returns the `id` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn id(&self) -> u64 {
self.id
}
/// Returns the `start_position` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn start_position(&self) -> Vec2 {
self.start_position
}
/// Returns the `start_force` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn start_force(&self) -> Option<ForceTouch> {
self.start_force
}
/// Returns the `previous_position` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn previous_position(&self) -> Vec2 {
self.previous_position
}
/// Returns the `previous_force` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn previous_force(&self) -> Option<ForceTouch> {
self.previous_force
}
/// Returns the current `position` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn position(&self) -> Vec2 {
self.position
}
/// Returns the current `force` of the touch.
#[inline]
pub fn force(&self) -> Option<ForceTouch> {
self.force
}
}
impl From<&TouchInput> for Touch {
fn from(input: &TouchInput) -> Touch {
Touch {
id: input.id,
start_position: input.position,
start_force: input.force,
previous_position: input.position,
previous_force: input.force,
position: input.position,
force: input.force,
}
}
}
/// A collection of [`Touch`]es.
///
/// ## Usage
///
/// It is used to create a `bevy` resource that stores the data of the touches on a touchscreen
/// and can be accessed inside of a system.
///
/// ## Updating
///
/// The resource is updated inside of the [`touch_screen_input_system`](crate::touch::touch_screen_input_system).
Make `Resource` trait opt-in, requiring `#[derive(Resource)]` V2 (#5577) *This PR description is an edited copy of #5007, written by @alice-i-cecile.* # Objective Follow-up to https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/2254. The `Resource` trait currently has a blanket implementation for all types that meet its bounds. While ergonomic, this results in several drawbacks: * it is possible to make confusing, silent mistakes such as inserting a function pointer (Foo) rather than a value (Foo::Bar) as a resource * it is challenging to discover if a type is intended to be used as a resource * we cannot later add customization options (see the [RFC](https://github.com/bevyengine/rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/27-derive-component.md) for the equivalent choice for Component). * dependencies can use the same Rust type as a resource in invisibly conflicting ways * raw Rust types used as resources cannot preserve privacy appropriately, as anyone able to access that type can read and write to internal values * we cannot capture a definitive list of possible resources to display to users in an editor ## Notes to reviewers * Review this commit-by-commit; there's effectively no back-tracking and there's a lot of churn in some of these commits. *ira: My commits are not as well organized :')* * I've relaxed the bound on Local to Send + Sync + 'static: I don't think these concerns apply there, so this can keep things simple. Storing e.g. a u32 in a Local is fine, because there's a variable name attached explaining what it does. * I think this is a bad place for the Resource trait to live, but I've left it in place to make reviewing easier. IMO that's best tackled with https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/issues/4981. ## Changelog `Resource` is no longer automatically implemented for all matching types. Instead, use the new `#[derive(Resource)]` macro. ## Migration Guide Add `#[derive(Resource)]` to all types you are using as a resource. If you are using a third party type as a resource, wrap it in a tuple struct to bypass orphan rules. Consider deriving `Deref` and `DerefMut` to improve ergonomics. `ClearColor` no longer implements `Component`. Using `ClearColor` as a component in 0.8 did nothing. Use the `ClearColorConfig` in the `Camera3d` and `Camera2d` components instead. Co-authored-by: Alice <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: devil-ira <justthecooldude@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <mcanders1@gmail.com>
2022-08-08 21:36:35 +00:00
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Default, Resource)]
pub struct Touches {
/// A collection of every [`Touch`] that is currently being pressed.
pressed: HashMap<u64, Touch>,
/// A collection of every [`Touch`] that just got pressed.
just_pressed: HashMap<u64, Touch>,
/// A collection of every [`Touch`] that just got released.
just_released: HashMap<u64, Touch>,
/// A collection of every [`Touch`] that just got canceled.
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
just_canceled: HashMap<u64, Touch>,
}
impl Touches {
/// An iterator visiting every pressed [`Touch`] input in arbitrary order.
pub fn iter(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &Touch> + '_ {
self.pressed.values()
}
/// Returns the [`Touch`] input corresponding to the `id` if it is being pressed.
pub fn get_pressed(&self, id: u64) -> Option<&Touch> {
self.pressed.get(&id)
}
/// Checks if any touch input was just pressed.
pub fn any_just_pressed(&self) -> bool {
!self.just_pressed.is_empty()
}
/// Returns `true` if the input corresponding to the `id` has just been pressed.
pub fn just_pressed(&self, id: u64) -> bool {
self.just_pressed.contains_key(&id)
}
/// An iterator visiting every just pressed [`Touch`] input in arbitrary order.
pub fn iter_just_pressed(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &Touch> {
self.just_pressed.values()
}
/// Returns the [`Touch`] input corresponding to the `id` if it has just been released.
pub fn get_released(&self, id: u64) -> Option<&Touch> {
self.just_released.get(&id)
}
/// Checks if any touch input was just released.
pub fn any_just_released(&self) -> bool {
!self.just_released.is_empty()
}
/// Returns `true` if the input corresponding to the `id` has just been released.
pub fn just_released(&self, id: u64) -> bool {
self.just_released.contains_key(&id)
}
/// An iterator visiting every just released [`Touch`] input in arbitrary order.
pub fn iter_just_released(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &Touch> {
self.just_released.values()
}
/// Checks if any touch input was just canceled.
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
pub fn any_just_canceled(&self) -> bool {
!self.just_canceled.is_empty()
}
/// Returns `true` if the input corresponding to the `id` has just been canceled.
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
pub fn just_canceled(&self, id: u64) -> bool {
self.just_canceled.contains_key(&id)
}
/// An iterator visiting every just canceled [`Touch`] input in arbitrary order.
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
pub fn iter_just_canceled(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &Touch> {
self.just_canceled.values()
}
/// Retrieves the position of the first currently pressed touch, if any
pub fn first_pressed_position(&self) -> Option<Vec2> {
self.pressed.values().next().map(|t| t.position)
}
/// Processes a [`TouchInput`] event by updating the `pressed`, `just_pressed`,
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
/// `just_released`, and `just_canceled` collections.
fn process_touch_event(&mut self, event: &TouchInput) {
match event.phase {
TouchPhase::Started => {
self.pressed.insert(event.id, event.into());
self.just_pressed.insert(event.id, event.into());
}
TouchPhase::Moved => {
if let Some(mut new_touch) = self.pressed.get(&event.id).cloned() {
new_touch.previous_position = new_touch.position;
new_touch.previous_force = new_touch.force;
new_touch.position = event.position;
new_touch.force = event.force;
self.pressed.insert(event.id, new_touch);
}
}
TouchPhase::Ended => {
// if touch `just_released`, add related event to it
// the event position info is inside `pressed`, so use it unless not found
if let Some((_, v)) = self.pressed.remove_entry(&event.id) {
self.just_released.insert(event.id, v);
} else {
self.just_released.insert(event.id, event.into());
}
}
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
TouchPhase::Canceled => {
// if touch `just_canceled`, add related event to it
// the event position info is inside `pressed`, so use it unless not found
if let Some((_, v)) = self.pressed.remove_entry(&event.id) {
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
self.just_canceled.insert(event.id, v);
} else {
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
self.just_canceled.insert(event.id, event.into());
}
}
};
}
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
/// Clears the `just_pressed`, `just_released`, and `just_canceled` collections.
///
/// This is not clearing the `pressed` collection, because it could incorrectly mark
/// a touch input as not pressed even though it is pressed. This could happen if the
/// touch input is not moving for a single frame and would therefore be marked as
/// not pressed, because this function is called on every single frame no matter
/// if there was an event or not.
fn update(&mut self) {
self.just_pressed.clear();
self.just_released.clear();
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
self.just_canceled.clear();
}
}
/// Updates the [`Touches`] resource with the latest [`TouchInput`] events.
///
/// ## Differences
///
/// The main difference between the [`TouchInput`] event and the [`Touches`] resource is that
/// the latter has convenient functions like [`Touches::just_pressed`] and [`Touches::just_released`].
pub fn touch_screen_input_system(
mut touch_state: ResMut<Touches>,
mut touch_input_events: EventReader<TouchInput>,
) {
touch_state.update();
for event in touch_input_events.read() {
touch_state.process_touch_event(event);
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
#[test]
fn touch_update() {
use crate::{touch::Touch, Touches};
use bevy_math::Vec2;
let mut touches = Touches::default();
let touch_event = Touch {
id: 4,
start_position: Vec2::ZERO,
start_force: None,
previous_position: Vec2::ZERO,
previous_force: None,
position: Vec2::ZERO,
force: None,
};
// Add a touch to `just_pressed`, 'just_released', and 'just canceled'
touches.just_pressed.insert(4, touch_event);
touches.just_released.insert(4, touch_event);
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
touches.just_canceled.insert(4, touch_event);
touches.update();
// Verify that all the `just_x` maps are cleared
assert!(touches.just_pressed.is_empty());
assert!(touches.just_released.is_empty());
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
assert!(touches.just_canceled.is_empty());
}
#[test]
fn touch_process() {
use crate::{touch::TouchPhase, TouchInput, Touches};
use bevy_math::Vec2;
let mut touches = Touches::default();
// Test adding a `TouchPhase::Started`
let touch_event = TouchInput {
phase: TouchPhase::Started,
position: Vec2::splat(4.0),
force: None,
id: 4,
};
touches.update();
touches.process_touch_event(&touch_event);
assert!(touches.pressed.get(&touch_event.id).is_some());
assert!(touches.just_pressed.get(&touch_event.id).is_some());
// Test adding a `TouchPhase::Moved`
let moved_touch_event = TouchInput {
phase: TouchPhase::Moved,
position: Vec2::splat(5.0),
force: None,
id: touch_event.id,
};
touches.update();
touches.process_touch_event(&moved_touch_event);
assert_eq!(
touches
.pressed
.get(&moved_touch_event.id)
.expect("Missing from pressed after move.")
.previous_position,
touch_event.position
);
// Test cancelling an event
let cancel_touch_event = TouchInput {
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
phase: TouchPhase::Canceled,
position: Vec2::ONE,
force: None,
id: touch_event.id,
};
touches.update();
touches.process_touch_event(&cancel_touch_event);
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
assert!(touches.just_canceled.get(&touch_event.id).is_some());
assert!(touches.pressed.get(&touch_event.id).is_none());
// Test ending an event
let end_touch_event = TouchInput {
phase: TouchPhase::Ended,
position: Vec2::splat(4.0),
force: None,
id: touch_event.id,
};
touches.update();
touches.process_touch_event(&touch_event);
touches.process_touch_event(&moved_touch_event);
touches.process_touch_event(&end_touch_event);
assert!(touches.just_released.get(&touch_event.id).is_some());
assert!(touches.pressed.get(&touch_event.id).is_none());
let touch = touches.just_released.get(&touch_event.id).unwrap();
// Make sure the position is updated from TouchPhase::Moved and TouchPhase::Ended
assert!(touch.previous_position != touch.position);
}
#[test]
fn touch_pressed() {
use crate::{touch::TouchPhase, TouchInput, Touches};
use bevy_math::Vec2;
let mut touches = Touches::default();
let touch_event = TouchInput {
phase: TouchPhase::Started,
position: Vec2::splat(4.0),
force: None,
id: 4,
};
// Register the touch and test that it was registered correctly
touches.process_touch_event(&touch_event);
assert!(touches.get_pressed(touch_event.id).is_some());
assert!(touches.just_pressed(touch_event.id));
assert_eq!(touches.iter().count(), 1);
}
#[test]
fn touch_released() {
use crate::{touch::TouchPhase, TouchInput, Touches};
use bevy_math::Vec2;
let mut touches = Touches::default();
let touch_event = TouchInput {
phase: TouchPhase::Ended,
position: Vec2::splat(4.0),
force: None,
id: 4,
};
// Register the touch and test that it was registered correctly
touches.process_touch_event(&touch_event);
assert!(touches.get_released(touch_event.id).is_some());
assert!(touches.just_released(touch_event.id));
assert_eq!(touches.iter_just_released().count(), 1);
}
#[test]
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
fn touch_canceled() {
use crate::{touch::TouchPhase, TouchInput, Touches};
use bevy_math::Vec2;
let mut touches = Touches::default();
let touch_event = TouchInput {
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
phase: TouchPhase::Canceled,
position: Vec2::splat(4.0),
force: None,
id: 4,
};
// Register the touch and test that it was registered correctly
touches.process_touch_event(&touch_event);
Changed spelling linebreak_behaviour to linebreak_behavior (#8285) # Objective In the [`Text`](https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/3442a13d2cb4b2d77c9f7bf8b6dad25742bd21d7/crates/bevy_text/src/text.rs#L18) struct the field is named: `linebreak_behaviour`, the British spelling of _behavior_. **Update**, also found: - `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` - `TouchPhase::Cancelled` - `Touches.just_cancelled` The majority of all spelling is in the US but when you have a lot of contributors across the world, sometimes spelling differences can pop up in APIs such as in this case. For consistency, I think it would be worth a while to ensure that the API is persistent. Some examples: `from_reflect.rs` has `DefaultBehavior` TextStyle has `color` and uses the `Color` struct. In `bevy_input/src/Touch.rs` `TouchPhase::Cancelled` and _canceled_ are used interchangeably in the documentation I've found that there is also the same type of discrepancies in the documentation, though this is a low priority but is worth checking. **Update**: I've now checked the documentation (See #8291) ## Solution I've only renamed the inconsistencies that have breaking changes and documentation pertaining to them. The rest of the documentation will be changed via #8291. Do note that the winit API is written with UK spelling, thus this may be a cause for confusion: `winit::event::TouchPhase::Cancelled => TouchPhase::Canceled` `winit::event::WindowEvent::HoveredFileCancelled` -> Related to `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCanceled` But I'm hoping to maybe outline other spelling inconsistencies in the API, and maybe an addition to the contribution guide. --- ## Changelog - `Text` field `linebreak_behaviour` has been renamed to `linebreak_behavior`. - Event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` has been renamed to `HoveredFileCanceled` - Function `Touches.just_cancelled` has been renamed to `Touches.just_canceled` - Event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` has been renamed to `TouchPhase::Canceled` ## Migration Guide Update where `linebreak_behaviour` is used to `linebreak_behavior` Updated the event `FileDragAndDrop::HoveredFileCancelled` where used to `HoveredFileCanceled` Update `Touches.just_cancelled` where used as `Touches.just_canceled` The event `TouchPhase::Cancelled` is now called `TouchPhase::Canceled`
2023-04-05 21:25:53 +00:00
assert!(touches.just_canceled(touch_event.id));
assert_eq!(touches.iter_just_canceled().count(), 1);
}
}