DexLevel was the initial abstraction, which was expanded/reused for
evolution details
I should probably merge the two classes since everything is passed as
EvoCriteria
The encounter generators do some silly form fuzzy match which can now be
more accurately checked since I've moved Form to DexLevel... maybe a
future commit can clean that up.
encounterarea2 was reusing this class, just use a throwaway readonly
struct as our temp value storage
- Use tail recursion and a lookup table (species | form) for reversing
- generate the reversal lookup by extrapolating all species-form
destination values (EvolutionLink)
All tests pass, and no special handling for forms is required. Kinda
suspicious that it works this simply...
Redo evolution banning (no wormhole for non-Alolan evolutions in SM), in
a style that we can ban the Gigantamax event evolutions
(pika/meowth/eevee). Their evolutions can't be resulted from a pre-evo,
because the in-game routine early aborts if the gigantamax flag is set
for those species.
Update gen4 personal tables (formCount was 0, needs to be a minimum of 1
by default)
Closes#2537
format >= 6 is always true (early return in entry)
don't double-flag/check memory presence in OTs from gen5 and below (hist
and OT verifier)
rename method; I'll probably rework the flow of things for gen6
verification and gen8 verification since the rules are slightly
different
Certain Mark values (ribbon) are only obtainable if the encounter was
obtained in some weather (I really hope there's no crossover cases for
this), and non-symbol encounters can't wander to another zone.
I wonder if you can wander from one zone with one exclusive weather, to
another zone, and get an 'unobtainable' mark (with the new zone's
weather) on the crossover mon's weather. yikes lmao
yeah your initial hacks were hacks
It appears there's a bug (in the game) for link trade memories --
applied to the OT memory instead of HT memory?? Fun!
Private report with 3 specimens, 2 undocumented met locations
The other was a Gigantamax which matched another static encounter,
resulting in a partial match being accepted (the real match came after,
but was never iterated to).
Rather than adding deferrals for Enc8, do nest stuff first since it's
the most restrictive
In the past we didn't really have duplicate static encounters with
slightly different permissions.
Thanks @ReignOfComputer & {reporting user}!
