minor readme tweaks

This commit is contained in:
Nick Sweeting 2024-01-04 14:58:41 -08:00
parent 30fd005605
commit a0f01a543d

View file

@ -972,9 +972,9 @@ By having each user store their own content locally, we can save much larger por
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from [similar self-hosted projects](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#Web-Archiving-Projects) by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
<details>
<summary><i>Click to see the <b>officially recommended</b> alternatives to ArchiveBox...</i></summary>
<summary><i>Click to see the <b>⭐️ officially recommended</b> alternatives to ArchiveBox...</i></summary>
<br/>
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
*If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out [ArchiveWeb.page](https://archiveweb.page) and [ReplayWeb.page](https://replayweb.page).*
@ -984,6 +984,8 @@ ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for s
For more alternatives, see our [list here](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#Web-Archiving-Projects)...
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. We encourage you to try these other tools made by our friends if ArchiveBox isn't suited to your needs.
</details>
<br/>