From a0f01a543db3d4c552dd41b4e3caa510b5b39df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Sweeting Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:58:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] minor readme tweaks --- README.md | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 35f75f30..91b56c22 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -972,9 +972,9 @@ By having each user store their own content locally, we can save much larger por ArchiveBox differentiates itself from [similar self-hosted projects](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#Web-Archiving-Projects) by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
-Click to see the officially recommended alternatives to ArchiveBox... +Click to see the ⭐️ officially recommended alternatives to ArchiveBox... +
-ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs. *If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out [ArchiveWeb.page](https://archiveweb.page) and [ReplayWeb.page](https://replayweb.page).* @@ -984,6 +984,8 @@ ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for s For more alternatives, see our [list here](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#Web-Archiving-Projects)... +ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. We encourage you to try these other tools made by our friends if ArchiveBox isn't suited to your needs. +