* Treat _index.LANG.md as section, not page (close#1694)
Display more advanced information in case of a future crash here
* Add link to translated local section in test_site_i18n to catch #1694
It appears linking to another translated page does not trigger the bug,
but linking to a section within the same (translated) page does.
* Allow (and test for) homepage internal links in broken link detection
Co-authored-by: southerntofu <southerntofu@thunix.net>
* Translations are also generated for the index page (fix#1332)
* More tests for translations
* Even better error message
* Update page count for test
* Patch to fix Windows tests
By @mtolk
Co-authored-by: southerntofu <southerntofu@thunix.net>
* add fix for (#1135) Taxonomies with identical slugs now get merged (#1136)
* update templates so they propperly render taxonomy names
* squash! add fix for (#1135) Taxonomies with identical slugs now get merged (#1136)
reimplement taxonomy deduping
* revert unwanted changes to templates
* add tests for unic in permalinks
* add tests for unic in permalinks
This includes several breaking changes, but they’re easy to adjust for.
Atom 1.0 is superior to RSS 2.0 in a number of ways, both technical and
legal, though information from the last decade is hard to find.
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared
has some info which is probably still mostly correct.
How do RSS and Atom compare in terms of implementation support? The
impression I get is that proper Atom support in normal content websites
has been universal for over twelve years, but that support in podcasts
was not quite so good, but getting there, over twelve years ago. I have
no more recent facts or figures; no one talks about this stuff these
days. I remember investigating this stuff back in 2011–2013 and coming
to the same conclusion. At that time, I went with Atom on websites and
RSS in podcasts. Now I’d just go full Atom and hang any podcast tools
that don’t support Atom, because Atom’s semantics truly are much better.
In light of all this, I make the bold recommendation to default to Atom.
Nonetheless, for compatibility for existing users, and for those that
have Opinions, I’ve retained the RSS template, so that you can escape
the breaking change easily.
I personally prefer to give feeds a basename that doesn’t mention “Atom”
or “RSS”, e.g. “feed.xml”. I’ll be doing that myself, as I’ll be using
my own template with more Atom features anyway, like author information,
taxonomies and making the title field HTML.
Some notes about the Atom feed template:
- I went with atom.xml rather than something like feed.atom (the .atom
file format being registered for this purpose by RFC4287) due to lack
of confidence that it’ll be served with the right MIME type. .xml is a
safer default.
- It might be nice to get Zola’s version number into the <generator>
tag. Not for any particularly good reason, y’know. Just picture it:
<generator uri="https://www.getzola.org/" version="0.10.0">
Zola
</generator>
- I’d like to get taxonomies into the feed, but this requires exposing a
little more info than is currently exposed. I think it’d require
`TaxonomyConfig` to preferably have a new member `permalink` added
(which should be equivalent to something like `config.base_url ~ "/" ~
taxonomy.slug ~ "/"`), and for the feed to get all the taxonomies
passed into it (`taxonomies: HashMap<String, TaxonomyTerm>`).
Then, the template could be like this, inside the entry:
{% for taxonomy, terms in page.taxonomies %}
{% for term in terms %}
<category scheme="{{ taxonomies[taxonomy].permalink }}"
term="{{ term.slug }}" label="{{ term.name }}" />
{% endfor %}
{% endfor %}
Other remarks:
- I have added a date field `extra.updated` to my posts and include that
in the feed; I’ve observed others with a similar field. I believe this
should be included as an official field. I’m inclined to add author to
at least config.toml, too, for feeds.
- We need to have a link from the docs to the source of the built-in
templates, to help people that wish to alter it.
* Add path to `TranslatedContent`
This makes it possible to retrieve the translated page through the `get_page` function.
* Use TranslatedContent::path field in test_site_i18n
Use it with the `get_page` function to get a reference to the page object.
* fix the issue of generating the search index for multiple language
* updat docs for generating the search index for multiple language
* fix failed tests
* add tests for the search index of multiple language
