mirror of
https://github.com/AsahiLinux/u-boot
synced 2024-12-04 18:41:03 +00:00
1e01950333
Migrate the rest of the CONFIG_SYS_POST macros over to CFG_SYS_POST namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
732 lines
25 KiB
Text
732 lines
25 KiB
Text
Power-On-Self-Test support in U-Boot
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This project is to support Power-On-Self-Test (POST) in U-Boot.
|
|
|
|
1. High-level requirements
|
|
|
|
The key requirements for this project are as follows:
|
|
|
|
1) The project shall develop a flexible framework for implementing
|
|
and running Power-On-Self-Test in U-Boot. This framework shall
|
|
possess the following features:
|
|
|
|
o) Extensibility
|
|
|
|
The framework shall allow adding/removing/replacing POST tests.
|
|
Also, standalone POST tests shall be supported.
|
|
|
|
o) Configurability
|
|
|
|
The framework shall allow run-time configuration of the lists
|
|
of tests running on normal/power-fail booting.
|
|
|
|
o) Controllability
|
|
|
|
The framework shall support manual running of the POST tests.
|
|
|
|
2) The results of tests shall be saved so that it will be possible to
|
|
retrieve them from Linux.
|
|
|
|
3) The following POST tests shall be developed for MPC823E-based
|
|
boards:
|
|
|
|
o) CPU test
|
|
o) Cache test
|
|
o) Memory test
|
|
o) Ethernet test
|
|
o) Serial channels test
|
|
o) Watchdog timer test
|
|
o) RTC test
|
|
o) I2C test
|
|
o) SPI test
|
|
o) USB test
|
|
|
|
4) The LWMON board shall be used for reference.
|
|
|
|
2. Design
|
|
|
|
This section details the key points of the design for the project.
|
|
The whole project can be divided into two independent tasks:
|
|
enhancing U-Boot/Linux to provide a common framework for running POST
|
|
tests and developing such tests for particular hardware.
|
|
|
|
2.1. Hardware-independent POST layer
|
|
|
|
A new optional module will be added to U-Boot, which will run POST
|
|
tests and collect their results at boot time. Also, U-Boot will
|
|
support running POST tests manually at any time by executing a
|
|
special command from the system console.
|
|
|
|
The list of available POST tests will be configured at U-Boot build
|
|
time. The POST layer will allow the developer to add any custom POST
|
|
tests. All POST tests will be divided into the following groups:
|
|
|
|
1) Tests running on power-on booting only
|
|
|
|
This group will contain those tests that run only once on
|
|
power-on reset (e.g. watchdog test)
|
|
|
|
2) Tests running on normal booting only
|
|
|
|
This group will contain those tests that do not take much
|
|
time and can be run on the regular basis (e.g. CPU test)
|
|
|
|
3) Tests running in special "slow test mode" only
|
|
|
|
This group will contain POST tests that consume much time
|
|
and cannot be run regularly (e.g. strong memory test, I2C test)
|
|
|
|
4) Manually executed tests
|
|
|
|
This group will contain those tests that can be run manually.
|
|
|
|
If necessary, some tests may belong to several groups simultaneously.
|
|
For example, SDRAM test may run in both normal and "slow test" mode.
|
|
In normal mode, SDRAM test may perform a fast superficial memory test
|
|
only, while running in slow test mode it may perform a full memory
|
|
check-up.
|
|
|
|
Also, all tests will be discriminated by the moment they run at.
|
|
Specifically, the following groups will be singled out:
|
|
|
|
1) Tests running before relocating to RAM
|
|
|
|
These tests will run immediately after initializing RAM
|
|
as to enable modifying it without taking care of its
|
|
contents. Basically, this group will contain memory tests
|
|
only.
|
|
|
|
2) Tests running after relocating to RAM
|
|
|
|
These tests will run immediately before entering the main
|
|
loop as to guarantee full hardware initialization.
|
|
|
|
The POST layer will also distinguish a special group of tests that
|
|
may cause system rebooting (e.g. watchdog test). For such tests, the
|
|
layer will automatically detect rebooting and will notify the test
|
|
about it.
|
|
|
|
2.1.1. POST layer interfaces
|
|
|
|
This section details the interfaces between the POST layer and the
|
|
rest of U-Boot.
|
|
|
|
The following flags will be defined:
|
|
|
|
#define POST_POWERON 0x01 /* test runs on power-on booting */
|
|
#define POST_NORMAL 0x02 /* test runs on normal booting */
|
|
#define POST_SLOWTEST 0x04 /* test is slow, enabled by key press */
|
|
#define POST_POWERTEST 0x08 /* test runs after watchdog reset */
|
|
#define POST_ROM 0x100 /* test runs in ROM */
|
|
#define POST_RAM 0x200 /* test runs in RAM */
|
|
#define POST_MANUAL 0x400 /* test can be executed manually */
|
|
#define POST_REBOOT 0x800 /* test may cause rebooting */
|
|
#define POST_PREREL 0x1000 /* test runs before relocation */
|
|
|
|
The POST layer will export the following interface routines:
|
|
|
|
o) int post_run(struct bd_info *bd, char *name, int flags);
|
|
|
|
This routine will run the test (or the group of tests) specified
|
|
by the name and flag arguments. More specifically, if the name
|
|
argument is not NULL, the test with this name will be performed,
|
|
otherwise all tests running in ROM/RAM (depending on the flag
|
|
argument) will be executed. This routine will be called at least
|
|
twice with name set to NULL, once from board_init_f() and once
|
|
from board_init_r(). The flags argument will also specify the
|
|
mode the test is executed in (power-on, normal, power-fail,
|
|
manual).
|
|
|
|
o) void post_reloc(ulong offset);
|
|
|
|
This routine will be called from board_init_r() and will
|
|
relocate the POST test table.
|
|
|
|
o) int post_info(char *name);
|
|
|
|
This routine will print the list of all POST tests that can be
|
|
executed manually if name is NULL, and the description of a
|
|
particular test if name is not NULL.
|
|
|
|
o) int post_log(char *format, ...);
|
|
|
|
This routine will be called from POST tests to log their
|
|
results. Basically, this routine will print the results to
|
|
stderr. The format of the arguments and the return value
|
|
will be identical to the printf() routine.
|
|
|
|
Also, the following board-specific routines will be called from the
|
|
U-Boot common code:
|
|
|
|
o) int post_hotkeys_pressed(gd_t *gd)
|
|
|
|
This routine will scan the keyboard to detect if a magic key
|
|
combination has been pressed, or otherwise detect if the
|
|
power-on long-running tests shall be executed or not ("normal"
|
|
versus "slow" test mode).
|
|
|
|
The list of available POST tests be kept in the post_tests array
|
|
filled at U-Boot build time. The format of entry in this array will
|
|
be as follows:
|
|
|
|
struct post_test {
|
|
char *name;
|
|
char *cmd;
|
|
char *desc;
|
|
int flags;
|
|
int (*test)(struct bd_info *bd, int flags);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
o) name
|
|
|
|
This field will contain a short name of the test, which will be
|
|
used in logs and on listing POST tests (e.g. CPU test).
|
|
|
|
o) cmd
|
|
|
|
This field will keep a name for identifying the test on manual
|
|
testing (e.g. cpu). For more information, refer to section
|
|
"Command line interface".
|
|
|
|
o) desc
|
|
|
|
This field will contain a detailed description of the test,
|
|
which will be printed on user request. For more information, see
|
|
section "Command line interface".
|
|
|
|
o) flags
|
|
|
|
This field will contain a combination of the bit flags described
|
|
above, which will specify the mode the test is running in
|
|
(power-on, normal, power-fail or manual mode), the moment it
|
|
should be run at (before or after relocating to RAM), whether it
|
|
can cause system rebooting or not.
|
|
|
|
o) test
|
|
|
|
This field will contain a pointer to the routine that will
|
|
perform the test, which will take 2 arguments. The first
|
|
argument will be a pointer to the board info structure, while
|
|
the second will be a combination of bit flags specifying the
|
|
mode the test is running in (POST_POWERON, POST_NORMAL,
|
|
POST_SLOWTEST, POST_MANUAL) and whether the last execution of
|
|
the test caused system rebooting (POST_REBOOT). The routine will
|
|
return 0 on successful execution of the test, and 1 if the test
|
|
failed.
|
|
|
|
The lists of the POST tests that should be run at power-on/normal/
|
|
power-fail booting will be kept in the environment. Namely, the
|
|
following environment variables will be used: post_poweron,
|
|
powet_normal, post_slowtest.
|
|
|
|
2.1.2. Test results
|
|
|
|
The results of tests will be collected by the POST layer. The POST
|
|
log will have the following format:
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
START <name>
|
|
<test-specific output>
|
|
[PASSED|FAILED]
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
Basically, the results of tests will be printed to stderr. This
|
|
feature may be enhanced in future to spool the log to a serial line,
|
|
save it in non-volatile RAM (NVRAM), transfer it to a dedicated
|
|
storage server and etc.
|
|
|
|
2.1.3. Integration issues
|
|
|
|
All POST-related code will be #ifdef'ed with the CONFIG_POST macro.
|
|
This macro will be defined in the config_<board>.h file for those
|
|
boards that need POST. The CFG_POST macro will contain the list of
|
|
POST tests for the board. The macro will have the format of array
|
|
composed of post_test structures:
|
|
|
|
#define CFG_POST \
|
|
{
|
|
"On-board peripherals test", "board", \
|
|
" This test performs full check-up of the " \
|
|
"on-board hardware.", \
|
|
POST_RAM | POST_SLOWTEST, \
|
|
&board_post_test \
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
A new file, post.h, will be created in the include/ directory. This
|
|
file will contain common POST declarations and will define a set of
|
|
macros that will be reused for defining CFG_POST. As an example,
|
|
the following macro may be defined:
|
|
|
|
#define POST_CACHE \
|
|
{
|
|
"Cache test", "cache", \
|
|
" This test verifies the CPU cache operation.", \
|
|
POST_RAM | POST_NORMAL, \
|
|
&cache_post_test \
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
A new subdirectory will be created in the U-Boot root directory. It
|
|
will contain the source code of the POST layer and most of POST
|
|
tests. Each POST test in this directory will be placed into a
|
|
separate file (it will be needed for building standalone tests). Some
|
|
POST tests (mainly those for testing peripheral devices) will be
|
|
located in the source files of the drivers for those devices. This
|
|
way will be used only if the test subtantially uses the driver.
|
|
|
|
2.1.4. Standalone tests
|
|
|
|
The POST framework will allow to develop and run standalone tests. A
|
|
user-space library will be developed to provide the POST interface
|
|
functions to standalone tests.
|
|
|
|
2.1.5. Command line interface
|
|
|
|
A new command, diag, will be added to U-Boot. This command will be
|
|
used for listing all available hardware tests, getting detailed
|
|
descriptions of them and running these tests.
|
|
|
|
More specifically, being run without any arguments, this command will
|
|
print the list of all available hardware tests:
|
|
|
|
=> diag
|
|
Available hardware tests:
|
|
cache - cache test
|
|
cpu - CPU test
|
|
enet - SCC/FCC ethernet test
|
|
Use 'diag [<test1> [<test2>]] ... ' to get more info.
|
|
Use 'diag run [<test1> [<test2>]] ... ' to run tests.
|
|
=>
|
|
|
|
If the first argument to the diag command is not 'run', detailed
|
|
descriptions of the specified tests will be printed:
|
|
|
|
=> diag cpu cache
|
|
cpu - CPU test
|
|
This test verifies the arithmetic logic unit of CPU.
|
|
cache - cache test
|
|
This test verifies the CPU cache operation.
|
|
=>
|
|
|
|
If the first argument to diag is 'run', the specified tests will be
|
|
executed. If no tests are specified, all available tests will be
|
|
executed.
|
|
|
|
It will be prohibited to execute tests running in ROM manually. The
|
|
'diag' command will not display such tests and/or run them.
|
|
|
|
2.1.6. Power failure handling
|
|
|
|
The Linux kernel will be modified to detect power failures and
|
|
automatically reboot the system in such cases. It will be assumed
|
|
that the power failure causes a system interrupt.
|
|
|
|
To perform correct system shutdown, the kernel will register a
|
|
handler of the power-fail IRQ on booting. Being called, the handler
|
|
will run /sbin/reboot using the call_usermodehelper() routine.
|
|
/sbin/reboot will automatically bring the system down in a secure
|
|
way. This feature will be configured in/out from the kernel
|
|
configuration file.
|
|
|
|
The POST layer of U-Boot will check whether the system runs in
|
|
power-fail mode. If it does, the system will be powered off after
|
|
executing all hardware tests.
|
|
|
|
2.1.7. Hazardous tests
|
|
|
|
Some tests may cause system rebooting during their execution. For
|
|
some tests, this will indicate a failure, while for the Watchdog
|
|
test, this means successful operation of the timer.
|
|
|
|
In order to support such tests, the following scheme will be
|
|
implemented. All the tests that may cause system rebooting will have
|
|
the POST_REBOOT bit flag set in the flag field of the correspondent
|
|
post_test structure. Before starting tests marked with this bit flag,
|
|
the POST layer will store an identification number of the test in a
|
|
location in IMMR. On booting, the POST layer will check the value of
|
|
this variable and if it is set will skip over the tests preceding the
|
|
failed one. On second execution of the failed test, the POST_REBOOT
|
|
bit flag will be set in the flag argument to the test routine. This
|
|
will allow to detect system rebooting on the previous iteration. For
|
|
example, the watchdog timer test may have the following
|
|
declaration/body:
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
#define POST_WATCHDOG \
|
|
{
|
|
"Watchdog timer test", "watchdog", \
|
|
" This test checks the watchdog timer.", \
|
|
POST_RAM | POST_POWERON | POST_REBOOT, \
|
|
&watchdog_post_test \
|
|
}
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
int watchdog_post_test(struct bd_info *bd, int flags)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned long start_time;
|
|
|
|
if (flags & POST_REBOOT) {
|
|
/* Test passed */
|
|
return 0;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/* disable interrupts */
|
|
disable_interrupts();
|
|
/* 10-second delay */
|
|
...
|
|
/* if we've reached this, the watchdog timer does not work */
|
|
enable_interrupts();
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
2.2. Hardware-specific details
|
|
|
|
This project will also develop a set of POST tests for MPC8xx- based
|
|
systems. This section provides technical details of how it will be
|
|
done.
|
|
|
|
2.2.1. Generic PPC tests
|
|
|
|
The following generic POST tests will be developed:
|
|
|
|
o) CPU test
|
|
|
|
This test will check the arithmetic logic unit (ALU) of CPU. The
|
|
test will take several milliseconds and will run on normal
|
|
booting.
|
|
|
|
o) Cache test
|
|
|
|
This test will verify the CPU cache (L1 cache). The test will
|
|
run on normal booting.
|
|
|
|
o) Memory test
|
|
|
|
This test will examine RAM and check it for errors. The test
|
|
will always run on booting. On normal booting, only a limited
|
|
amount of RAM will be checked. On power-fail booting a fool
|
|
memory check-up will be performed.
|
|
|
|
2.2.1.1. CPU test
|
|
|
|
This test will verify the following ALU instructions:
|
|
|
|
o) Condition register istructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: mtcrf, mfcr, mcrxr, crand, crandc,
|
|
cror, crorc, crxor, crnand, crnor, creqv, mcrf.
|
|
|
|
The mtcrf/mfcr instructions will be tested by loading different
|
|
values into the condition register (mtcrf), moving its value to
|
|
a general-purpose register (mfcr) and comparing this value with
|
|
the expected one. The mcrxr instruction will be tested by
|
|
loading a fixed value into the XER register (mtspr), moving XER
|
|
value to the condition register (mcrxr), moving it to a
|
|
general-purpose register (mfcr) and comparing the value of this
|
|
register with the expected one. The rest of instructions will be
|
|
tested by loading a fixed value into the condition register
|
|
(mtcrf), executing each instruction several times to modify all
|
|
4-bit condition fields, moving the value of the conditional
|
|
register to a general-purpose register (mfcr) and comparing it
|
|
with the expected one.
|
|
|
|
o) Integer compare instructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: cmp, cmpi, cmpl, cmpli.
|
|
|
|
To verify these instructions the test will run them with
|
|
different combinations of operands, read the condition register
|
|
value and compare it with the expected one. More specifically,
|
|
the test will contain a pre-built table containing the
|
|
description of each test case: the instruction, the values of
|
|
the operands, the condition field to save the result in and the
|
|
expected result.
|
|
|
|
o) Arithmetic instructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: add, addc, adde, addme, addze, subf,
|
|
subfc, subfe, subme, subze, mullw, mulhw, mulhwu, divw, divwu,
|
|
extsb, extsh.
|
|
|
|
The test will contain a pre-built table of instructions,
|
|
operands, expected results and expected states of the condition
|
|
register. For each table entry, the test will cyclically use
|
|
different sets of operand registers and result registers. For
|
|
example, for instructions that use 3 registers on the first
|
|
iteration r0/r1 will be used as operands and r2 for result. On
|
|
the second iteration, r1/r2 will be used as operands and r3 as
|
|
for result and so on. This will enable to verify all
|
|
general-purpose registers.
|
|
|
|
o) Logic instructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: and, andc, andi, andis, or, orc, ori,
|
|
oris, xor, xori, xoris, nand, nor, neg, eqv, cntlzw.
|
|
|
|
The test scheme will be identical to that from the previous
|
|
point.
|
|
|
|
o) Shift instructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: slw, srw, sraw, srawi, rlwinm, rlwnm,
|
|
rlwimi
|
|
|
|
The test scheme will be identical to that from the previous
|
|
point.
|
|
|
|
o) Branch instructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: b, bl, bc.
|
|
|
|
The first 2 instructions (b, bl) will be verified by jumping to
|
|
a fixed address and checking whether control was transferred to
|
|
that very point. For the bl instruction the value of the link
|
|
register will be checked as well (using mfspr). To verify the bc
|
|
instruction various combinations of the BI/BO fields, the CTR
|
|
and the condition register values will be checked. The list of
|
|
such combinations will be pre-built and linked in U-Boot at
|
|
build time.
|
|
|
|
o) Load/store instructions
|
|
|
|
This group will contain: lbz(x)(u), lhz(x)(u), lha(x)(u),
|
|
lwz(x)(u), stb(x)(u), sth(x)(u), stw(x)(u).
|
|
|
|
All operations will be performed on a 16-byte array. The array
|
|
will be 4-byte aligned. The base register will point to offset
|
|
8. The immediate offset (index register) will range in [-8 ...
|
|
+7]. The test cases will be composed so that they will not cause
|
|
alignment exceptions. The test will contain a pre-built table
|
|
describing all test cases. For store instructions, the table
|
|
entry will contain: the instruction opcode, the value of the
|
|
index register and the value of the source register. After
|
|
executing the instruction, the test will verify the contents of
|
|
the array and the value of the base register (it must change for
|
|
"store with update" instructions). For load instructions, the
|
|
table entry will contain: the instruction opcode, the array
|
|
contents, the value of the index register and the expected value
|
|
of the destination register. After executing the instruction,
|
|
the test will verify the value of the destination register and
|
|
the value of the base register (it must change for "load with
|
|
update" instructions).
|
|
|
|
o) Load/store multiple/string instructions
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPU test will run in RAM in order to allow run-time modification
|
|
of the code to reduce the memory footprint.
|
|
|
|
2.2.1.2 Special-Purpose Registers Tests
|
|
|
|
TBD.
|
|
|
|
2.2.1.3. Cache test
|
|
|
|
To verify the data cache operation the following test scenarios will
|
|
be used:
|
|
|
|
1) Basic test #1
|
|
|
|
- turn on the data cache
|
|
- switch the data cache to write-back or write-through mode
|
|
- invalidate the data cache
|
|
- write the negative pattern to a cached area
|
|
- read the area
|
|
|
|
The negative pattern must be read at the last step
|
|
|
|
2) Basic test #2
|
|
|
|
- turn on the data cache
|
|
- switch the data cache to write-back or write-through mode
|
|
- invalidate the data cache
|
|
- write the zero pattern to a cached area
|
|
- turn off the data cache
|
|
- write the negative pattern to the area
|
|
- turn on the data cache
|
|
- read the area
|
|
|
|
The negative pattern must be read at the last step
|
|
|
|
3) Write-through mode test
|
|
|
|
- turn on the data cache
|
|
- switch the data cache to write-through mode
|
|
- invalidate the data cache
|
|
- write the zero pattern to a cached area
|
|
- flush the data cache
|
|
- write the negative pattern to the area
|
|
- turn off the data cache
|
|
- read the area
|
|
|
|
The negative pattern must be read at the last step
|
|
|
|
4) Write-back mode test
|
|
|
|
- turn on the data cache
|
|
- switch the data cache to write-back mode
|
|
- invalidate the data cache
|
|
- write the negative pattern to a cached area
|
|
- flush the data cache
|
|
- write the zero pattern to the area
|
|
- invalidate the data cache
|
|
- read the area
|
|
|
|
The negative pattern must be read at the last step
|
|
|
|
To verify the instruction cache operation the following test
|
|
scenarios will be used:
|
|
|
|
1) Basic test #1
|
|
|
|
- turn on the instruction cache
|
|
- unlock the entire instruction cache
|
|
- invalidate the instruction cache
|
|
- lock a branch instruction in the instruction cache
|
|
- replace the branch instruction with "nop"
|
|
- jump to the branch instruction
|
|
- check that the branch instruction was executed
|
|
|
|
2) Basic test #2
|
|
|
|
- turn on the instruction cache
|
|
- unlock the entire instruction cache
|
|
- invalidate the instruction cache
|
|
- jump to a branch instruction
|
|
- check that the branch instruction was executed
|
|
- replace the branch instruction with "nop"
|
|
- invalidate the instruction cache
|
|
- jump to the branch instruction
|
|
- check that the "nop" instruction was executed
|
|
|
|
The CPU test will run in RAM in order to allow run-time modification
|
|
of the code.
|
|
|
|
2.2.1.4. Memory test
|
|
|
|
The memory test will verify RAM using sequential writes and reads
|
|
to/from RAM. Specifically, there will be several test cases that will
|
|
use different patterns to verify RAM. Each test case will first fill
|
|
a region of RAM with one pattern and then read the region back and
|
|
compare its contents with the pattern. The following patterns will be
|
|
used:
|
|
|
|
1) zero pattern (0x00000000)
|
|
2) negative pattern (0xffffffff)
|
|
3) checkerboard pattern (0x55555555, 0xaaaaaaaa)
|
|
4) bit-flip pattern ((1 << (offset % 32)), ~(1 << (offset % 32)))
|
|
5) address pattern (offset, ~offset)
|
|
|
|
Patterns #1, #2 will help to find unstable bits. Patterns #3, #4 will
|
|
be used to detect adherent bits, i.e. bits whose state may randomly
|
|
change if adjacent bits are modified. The last pattern will be used
|
|
to detect far-located errors, i.e. situations when writing to one
|
|
location modifies an area located far from it. Also, usage of the
|
|
last pattern will help to detect memory controller misconfigurations
|
|
when RAM represents a cyclically repeated portion of a smaller size.
|
|
|
|
Being run in normal mode, the test will verify only small 4Kb regions
|
|
of RAM around each 1Mb boundary. For example, for 64Mb RAM the
|
|
following areas will be verified: 0x00000000-0x00000800,
|
|
0x000ff800-0x00100800, 0x001ff800-0x00200800, ..., 0x03fff800-
|
|
0x04000000. If the test is run in power-fail mode, it will verify the
|
|
whole RAM.
|
|
|
|
The memory test will run in ROM before relocating U-Boot to RAM in
|
|
order to allow RAM modification without saving its contents.
|
|
|
|
2.2.2. Common tests
|
|
|
|
This section describes tests that are not based on any hardware
|
|
peculiarities and use common U-Boot interfaces only. These tests do
|
|
not need any modifications for porting them to another board/CPU.
|
|
|
|
2.2.2.1. I2C test
|
|
|
|
For verifying the I2C bus, a full I2C bus scanning will be performed
|
|
using the i2c_probe() routine. If a board defines
|
|
CFG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS the I2C test will pass if all devices
|
|
listed in CFG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS are found, and no additional
|
|
devices are detected. If CFG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS is not defined
|
|
the test will pass if any I2C device is found.
|
|
|
|
The CFG_SYS_POST_I2C_IGNORES define can be used to list I2C
|
|
devices which may or may not be present when using
|
|
CFG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS. The I2C POST test will pass regardless
|
|
if the devices in CFG_SYS_POST_I2C_IGNORES are found or not.
|
|
This is useful in cases when I2C devices are optional (eg on a
|
|
daughtercard that may or may not be present) or not critical
|
|
to board operation.
|
|
|
|
2.2.2.2. Watchdog timer test
|
|
|
|
To test the watchdog timer the scheme mentioned above (refer to
|
|
section "Hazardous tests") will be used. Namely, this test will be
|
|
marked with the POST_REBOOT bit flag. On the first iteration, the
|
|
test routine will make a 10-second delay. If the system does not
|
|
reboot during this delay, the watchdog timer is not operational and
|
|
the test fails. If the system reboots, on the second iteration the
|
|
POST_REBOOT bit will be set in the flag argument to the test routine.
|
|
The test routine will check this bit and report a success if it is
|
|
set.
|
|
|
|
2.2.2.3. RTC test
|
|
|
|
The RTC test will use the rtc_get()/rtc_set() routines. The following
|
|
features will be verified:
|
|
|
|
o) Time uniformity
|
|
|
|
This will be verified by reading RTC in polling within a short
|
|
period of time (5-10 seconds).
|
|
|
|
o) Passing month boundaries
|
|
|
|
This will be checked by setting RTC to a second before a month
|
|
boundary and reading it after its passing the boundary. The test
|
|
will be performed for both leap- and nonleap-years.
|
|
|
|
2.2.3. MPC8xx peripherals tests
|
|
|
|
This project will develop a set of tests verifying the peripheral
|
|
units of MPC8xx processors. Namely, the following controllers of the
|
|
MPC8xx communication processor module (CPM) will be tested:
|
|
|
|
o) Serial Management Controllers (SMC)
|
|
|
|
o) Serial Communication Controllers (SCC)
|
|
|
|
2.2.3.1. Ethernet tests (SCC)
|
|
|
|
The internal (local) loopback mode will be used to test SCC. To do
|
|
that the controllers will be configured accordingly and several
|
|
packets will be transmitted. These tests may be enhanced in future to
|
|
use external loopback for testing. That will need appropriate
|
|
reconfiguration of the physical interface chip.
|
|
|
|
The test routines for the SCC ethernet tests will be located in
|
|
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/scc.c.
|
|
|
|
2.2.3.2. UART tests (SMC/SCC)
|
|
|
|
To perform these tests the internal (local) loopback mode will be
|
|
used. The SMC/SCC controllers will be configured to connect the
|
|
transmitter output to the receiver input. After that, several bytes
|
|
will be transmitted. These tests may be enhanced to make to perform
|
|
"external" loopback test using a loopback cable. In this case, the
|
|
test will be executed manually.
|
|
|
|
The test routine for the SMC/SCC UART tests will be located in
|
|
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/serial.c.
|
|
|
|
2.2.3.3. USB test
|
|
|
|
TBD
|
|
|
|
2.2.3.4. SPI test
|
|
|
|
TBD
|