Dario Binacchi c1af358cf5 imx: mx6ull: fix REFTOP_VBGADJ setting ... The previous code wrote the contents of the fuse as is in the REFTOP_VBGADJ[2:0], but this was wrong if you consider the contents of the table in the code comment. This table is also different from the table in the commit description. But then, which of the two is correct? If it is assumed that an unprogrammed fuse has a value of 0 then for backward compatibility of the code REFTOP_VBGADJ[2:0] must be set to 6 (b'110). Therefore, the table in the code comment can be considered correct as well as this patch. Fixes: 97c16dc8bf ("imx: mx6ull: update the REFTOP_VBGADJ setting") Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>		2022-02-05 15:49:02 +01:00
..
clock.c	imx6: allow usage of disable_ldb_di_clock_sources for CONFIG_MX6QDL	2020-11-01 15:58:47 +01:00
ddr.c	ARM: mx6: ddr: Add support for iMX6UL/ULL/SL/SDL	2020-09-17 14:40:55 +02:00
Kconfig	udoo: Select CMD_DM	2022-01-08 11:16:03 -05:00
litesom.c	common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header	2021-02-02 15:33:42 -05:00
Makefile	imx: add module fuse support	2020-05-10 13:21:13 +02:00
module_fuse.c	treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle	2020-07-17 09:30:13 -04:00
mp.c	global: Convert simple_strtoul() with hex to hextoul()	2021-08-02 13:32:14 -04:00
opos6ul.c	common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header	2021-02-02 15:33:42 -05:00
soc.c	imx: mx6ull: fix REFTOP_VBGADJ setting	2022-02-05 15:49:02 +01:00