The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Add initial support for Google's Coral Dev Board based on i.MX8MQ.
https://coral.ai/products/dev-board
The Phanbell naming has been used here to match the naming convention
used in Google's U-Boot source tree:
https://coral.googlesource.com/uboot-imx/
Co-developed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alifer Moraes <alifer.wsdm@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Marco Franchi <marcofrk@gmail.com>
