The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
This function can be dropped when all boards use driver model for PCI. For
now, move it into init.h with a comment.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Rename the CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT name to CONFIG_NXP_ESBC to avoid
conflicts with UEFI secure boot.
Signed-off-by: Udit Agarwal <udit.agarwal@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>
Compile the legacy PCIe initialization routines for P2041RDB,
P3041, P4080, P5020 and P5040 DS boards only when DM_PCI is
not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Thomas reported U-Boot failed to build host tools if libfdt-devel
package is installed because tools include libfdt headers from
/usr/include/ instead of using internal ones.
This commit moves the header code:
include/libfdt.h -> include/linux/libfdt.h
include/libfdt_env.h -> include/linux/libfdt_env.h
and replaces include directives:
#include <libfdt.h> -> #include <linux/libfdt.h>
#include <libfdt_env.h> -> #include <linux/libfdt_env.h>
Reported-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Secure Boot Target is added for NAND for P3041.
For mpc85xx SoCs, the core begins execution from address 0xFFFFFFFC.
In case of secure boot, this default address maps to Boot ROM.
The Boot ROM code requires that the bootloader(U-boot) must lie
in 0 to 3.5G address space i.e. 0x0 - 0xDFFFFFFF.
In case of NAND Secure Boot, CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT is enabled and CPC is
configured as SRAM. U-Boot binary will be located on SRAM configured
at address 0xBFF00000.
In the U-Boot code, TLB entries are created to map the virtual address
0xFFF00000 to physical address 0xBFF00000 of CPC configured as SRAM.
Signed-off-by: Saksham Jain <saksham@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Cc: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
When boot from PCIE, slave's core should be in holdoff after powered on for
some specific requirements. Master will release the slave's core at the
right time by PCIE interface.
Slave's ucode and ENV can be stored in master's memory space, then slave
can fetch them through PCIE interface. For the corenet platform, ucode is
for Fman.
NOTE: Because the slave can not erase, write master's NOR flash by
PCIE interface, so it can not modify the ENV parameters stored
in master's NOR flash using "saveenv" or other commands.
environment and requirement:
master:
1. NOR flash for its own u-boot image, ucode and ENV space.
2. Slave's u-boot image is in master NOR flash.
3. Put the slave's ucode and ENV into it's own memory space.
4. Normally boot from local NOR flash.
5. Configure PCIE system if needed.
slave:
1. Just has EEPROM for RCW. No flash for u-boot image, ucode and ENV.
2. Boot location should be set to one PCIE interface by RCW.
3. RCW should configure the SerDes, PCIE interfaces correctly.
4. Must set all the cores in holdoff by RCW.
5. Must be powered on before master's boot.
For the slave module, need to finish these processes:
1. Set the boot location to one PCIE interface by RCW.
2. Set a specific TLB entry for the boot process.
3. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID of one PCIE for the boot.
4. Set a specific TLB entry in order to fetch ucode and ENV from
master.
5. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID one of the PCIE ports for
ucode and ENV.
6. Slave's u-boot image should be generated specifically by
make xxxx_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_config.
This will set SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFFF80000 and other configurations.
In addition, the processes are very similar between boot from SRIO and
boot from PCIE. Some configurations like the address spaces can be set to
the same. So the module of boot from PCIE was added based on the existing
module of boot from SRIO, and the following changes were needed:
1. Updated the README.srio-boot-corenet to add descriptions about
boot from PCIE, and change the name to
README.srio-pcie-boot-corenet.
2. Changed the compile config "xxxx_SRIOBOOT_SLAVE" to
"xxxx_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT", and the image builded with
"xxxx_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT" can support both the boot from SRIO and
from PCIE.
3. Updated other macros and documents if needed to add information
about boot from PCIE.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
When compile the slave image for boot from SRIO, no longer need to
specify which SRIO port it will boot from. The code will get this
information from RCW and then finishes corresponding configurations.
This has the following advantages:
1. No longer need to rebuild an image when change the SRIO port for
boot from SRIO, just rewrite the new RCW with selected port,
then the code will get the port information by reading new RCW.
2. It will be easier to support other boot location options, for
example, boot from PCIE.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
When boot from SRIO, slave's ucode can be stored in master's memory space,
then slave can fetch the ucode image through SRIO interface. For the
corenet platform, ucode is for Fman.
Master needs to:
1. Put the slave's ucode image into it's own memory space.
2. Set an inbound SRIO window covered slave's ucode stored in master's
memory space.
Slave needs to:
1. Set a specific TLB entry in order to fetch ucode from master.
2. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID SRIO1 or SRIO2 for ucode.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
For the powerpc processors with SRIO interface, boot location can be configured
from SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW. The processor booting from SRIO can do without flash
for u-boot image. The image can be fetched from another processor's memory
space by SRIO link connected between them.
The processor boots from SRIO is slave, the processor boots from normal flash
memory space and can help slave to boot from its memory space is master.
They are different environments and requirements:
master:
1. NOR flash for its own u-boot image, ucode and ENV space.
2. Slave's u-boot image in master NOR flash.
3. Normally boot from local NOR flash.
4. Configure SRIO switch system if needed.
slave:
1. Just has EEPROM for RCW. No flash for u-boot image, ucode and ENV.
2. Boot location should be set to SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW.
3. RCW should configure the SerDes, SRIO interfaces correctly.
4. Slave must be powered on after master's boot.
5. Must define CONFIG_SYS_QE_FMAN_FW_IN_REMOTE because of no ucode
locally.
For the slave module, need to finish these processes:
1. Set the boot location to SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW.
2. Set a specific TLB entry for the boot process.
3. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID SRIO1 or SRIO2 for the boot.
4. Slave's u-boot image should be generated specifically by
make xxxx_SRIOBOOT_SLAVE_config.
This will set SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFFF80000 and other configurations.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
The P2041RDB has almost identical setup for TLB, LAWS, and PCI with
other P-Series CoreNet platforms.
The only difference between P2041RDB & P3041DS/P4080DS/P5020DS is the
CPLD vs PIXIS FPGA which we can handle via some simple #ifdefs in the
TLB and LAW setup tables.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
We currently support 4 SoC/Boards from the P-Series of QorIQ SoCs that
are based on the 'CoreNet' Architecture: P2041RDB, P3041DS, P4080DS, and
P5020DS. There is a significant amount of commonality shared between
these boards that we can refactor into common code:
* Initial LAW setup
* Initial TLB setup
* PCI setup
We start by moving the shared code between P3041DS, P4080DS, and P5020DS
into a common directory to be shared with other P-Series CoreNet boards.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
